Open Access

Role of apoptosis inhibitor of macrophages in patients with IgG4‑related disease/autoimmune pancreatitis and the clinical characteristics associated with this condition

  • Authors:
    • Shiroh Tanoue
    • Shuji Kanmura
    • Makoto Hinokuchi
    • Shiho Arima
    • Fumisato Sasaki
    • Shinichi Hashimoto
    • Akio Ido
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: August 24, 2022     https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2022.1565
  • Article Number: 82
  • Copyright: © Tanoue et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a pancreatic manifestation of IgG4‑related disease (IgG4‑RD) and is a unique chronic inflammatory disease characterized by fibrosis. IgG4‑RD is caused by an autoimmune mechanism that mimics malignant tumors and inflammatory disorders. Apoptosis inhibitor of macrophages (AIM) can function as a biomarker of autoimmune or inflammatory diseases with tissue fibrosis, including in inflammatory bowel disease and chronic liver disease. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to clarify the role of serum AIM levels and the clinical characteristics of patients with IgG4‑RD and AIP. For this purpose, serum AIM concentrations were assessed using ELISA and the association between AIM and the laboratory and clinical data from patients with IgG4‑RD/AIP, patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) and healthy controls (HCs), was determined. The results demonstrated that the serum AIM concentrations were not associated with the laboratory data. However, the serum AIM levels were significantly elevated in patients with AIP compared with the HCs and patients with PC. Furthermore, the serum AIM levels significantly decreased following steroid therapy in patients with AIP who were in remission. Overall, the present study demonstrates that serum AIM levels may be a potentially useful biomarker for the differential diagnosis of AIP and for evaluating the therapeutic reactivity of affected patients.

Introduction

IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a multiorgan lymphoproliferative disease characterized in the majority of patients by increased serum IgG4 concentrations. It is considered to be a systemic, chronic, inflammatory disorder characterized by enlarged organs, the abundant infiltration of IgG4+ plasmacytes and fibrosis in the involved organs. Yoshida et al (1) reported that chronic pancreatitis caused by an autoimmune mechanism responded well to steroid therapy. Moreover, Hamano et al (2) described this disorder as autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) with high serum IgG4 concentrations. Therefore, AIP is described as a pancreatic manifestation of IgG4-RD (3,4). IgG4-RD is an immune-mediated condition that mimics malignant and inflammatory disorders.

IgG4-RD was initially identified among Japanese patients with sclerosing chronic pancreatitis. The extensive infiltration of IgG4-positive plasma cells and lymphocytes with fibrosis was found in the involved organs, which mimicked malignant tumors or inflammatory diseases. Although the established standard therapy for IgG4-RD and AIP involves the use of steroids, the high relapse rate among patients is concerning. Moreover, half of all patients with AIP exhibit focal (<33% of the whole pancreas) or segmental (>33 and <66%) pancreatic enlargement, which can be difficult to distinguish from pancreatic malignant tumors (5,6). Therefore, it is necessary to investigate novel therapeutics and diagnostic markers.

Differentiated and mature macrophages produce apoptosis inhibitor of macrophages (AIM), which is named based on its function of suppressing macrophage apoptosis (7,8). Arai and Miyazaki (9) suggested that blood AIM concentrations may function as a biomarker for obesity-associated autoimmune disease in humans. As a secretory protein, AIM is found in the blood and its concentration changes in various diseases (8,10,11). In a previous study, it was demonstrated that there was an association between AIM and hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C (12). It has also been determined that AIM may function as a biomarker for distinguishing between different inflammatory bowel diseases (13). It can thus be hypothesized that AIM may function as a biomarker for autoimmune and inflammatory diseases with tissue fibrosis, such as IgG4-RD and AIP. However, to the best of our knowledge the clinical significance of AIM in IgG4-RD and AIP has not previously been investigated. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the role of serum AIM concentrations in patients with IgG4-RD and AIP.

Patients and methods

Patients

The present study was retrospective in nature. In total, 38 patients who fulfilled the comprehensive diagnostic criteria [APS 2011, ICDC, IgG4-RD 2011 (14-16)] of having IgG4-RD and AIP and who were admitted to Kagoshima University, Medical and Dental Hospital (Kagoshima, Japan) between January, 2006 and December, 2016 were enrolled in the study. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) was performed in 27 patients with AIP to obtain pancreatic tissue and all tissue was subjected to immunohistochemical analysis. Baseline laboratory findings including serum amylase and IgG4 and CRP levels were retrieved from the patients' medical records. Organ involvement was determined from reviews of each patient's history and the results of a physical examination, computed tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography/CT, laboratory analyses and tissue biopsies. Moreover, a history of malignant disease was determined from the medical records. Relapse was defined by a symptomatic status or having elevated serum IgG4 concentrations during maintenance therapy. A pathological diagnosis was not necessary (17). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients and healthy controls (HCs). The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kagoshima University Medical and Dental Hospital (approval no. 28-241).

ELISA of serum AIM levels

Baseline serum samples were collected from 32 patients who had not been treated at the time of diagnosis and among these, patient serum samples from only 16 patients who were in remission on steroid therapy were collected before and after treatment. Samples were portioned and stored at -80˚C. The serum AIM concentrations in patients with untreated IgG4-RD with AIP (n=32), patients with AIP before and after treatment in remission (n=17), patients with pancreatic cancer (PC; n=30) who were admitted to the same hospital and healthy controls (HCs; n=32) were determined using ELISA kits (cat. no. KK901, Trans Genic, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, serum samples (1:1,000) were incubated for 1 h at room temperature. The wells were washed three times with PBS and subsequently HRP-conjugated anti-human IgG antibody (1:30, included in the ELISA kit) was added followed by incubation for 10 min at room temperature. The HCs were subjects without AIP or PC and included students and staff recruited from the facility (Kagoshima University).

Immunohistological analysis

Pancreatic tissues from patients with AIP were obtained following EUS-FNA for immunohistological staining as previously described (13). Briefly, tissue samples were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, cut into 2-µm-thick sections, blocked with Protein Block Serum-Free (cat. no. X0909, Dako; Agilent Technologies, Inc.) for 3 h at room temperature and then incubated at room temperature overnight with the following antibodies against: Human AIM (1:400, cat. no. 54264, Anaspec, Inc.), human CD14 (1:200, cat. no. ab45870, Abcam) and human CD16 (1:500, cat. no. MCA2537, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). Secondary antibodies were donkey anti-rabbit IgG(H+L) Highly Cross Adsorbed Secondary Antibody Alexa Fluor 488 (cat. no. A21206, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), donkey anti-goat IgG(H+L) Cross Adsorbed Secondary Antibody Alexa Fluor 647 (cat. no. A21447, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), donkey anti-mouse IgG(H+L) Highly Cross Adsorbed Secondary Antibody Alexa Fluor 555 (cat. no. A231570, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), respectively (1:200). All were incubated at room temperature for 35 min. Fluorescence emission was analyzed using a fluorescence microscope (BZ9000; Keyence Corporation).

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using SPSS software version 24 (IBM Corp.) at least twice. Data were statistically analyzed using a non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's test as post hoc test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Chi-squared test. Correlation coefficients were determined using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient test. Data are presented as the mean±SD. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Characteristics of all patients with IgG4-RD/AIP

The characteristics for all the 38 enrolled patients with IgG4-RD and AIP are summarized in Table I. The number and age of the patients was significantly higher for males [n=25 (65.8%); mean age, 69.2±9.1 years] than for females [n=13 (34.2%); mean age, 59.8±7.0 years]. The mean number of organs involved per patient was 2.4. At least two organs were involved in 25 (65.8%) patients. The serum IgG4 and IgG concentrations were 640.0±423.1 and 2,523.2±1,011.9 mg/dl, respectively. The serum concentrations of the soluble IL-2 receptor (1,186.8±524.2 U/ml; normal concentration, 121-613 U/ml) and IgE (966.3±1,185.8 U/ml; normal concentration, <232 U/ml) were elevated. The median serum AIM concentration was 3,891.9±8,374.5 ng/ml. No significant difference was observed in these biomarkers between the sexes.

Table I

Comparison of baseline characteristics and associations between serum AIM levels and clinical parameters in patients with IgG4-RD.

Table I

Comparison of baseline characteristics and associations between serum AIM levels and clinical parameters in patients with IgG4-RD.

CharacteristicTotalMaleFemaleP-value
Sex, n (%)3825 (65.8%)13 (34.2%)0.001
Age, years64.8±10.369.2±9.159.8±7.00.002
Number of organs, n2.4±1.32.6±1.41.9±0.90.159
IgG4, mg/dl640.0±423.1640.5±428.8639.1±430.30.993
IgG, mg/dl2,523.2±1,011.92,603.7±1,014.72,362.3±1,032.10.508
IgG4/IgG ratio0.3±0.20.2± 0.10.27±0.130.543
IgE, IU/l966.3±1,185.81,186.3±1,395.8636.3±776.10.399
IgM, mg/dl122.0±80.2111.2±69.2134.0±93.60.551
IgA, mg/dl212.2±76.8228.0±74.4194.5±79.80.357
Amy, IU/l119.2±184.1142.9±227.377.9±41.90.338
P-Amy, IU/l84.7±209.3112.9±263.237.8±27.90.407
FBS, mg/dl125.9±47.3130.9±51.9116.4±37.20.419
HbA1c, %6.5±1.56.5±1.66.4±1.10.844
CEA, ng/ml2.6±1.32.9±1.32.2±1.30.143
CA19-9, U/ml48.5±126.133.3±52.177.5±206.00.499
sIL-2 receptor, U/ml1,186.8±524.21,305.3±564.4932.9±328.70.123
White blood cells, n5,894±1,6385,765±1,7196,165±1,5020.534
Neutrophils3,419±12123,388±13573,508±7240.826
Eosinophils230±1423224±134244±1780.752
AIM, ng/ml 3,891.9±8,374.5 4,329.5±9,908.01,505.4±559.00.287

[i] Amy, amylase; P-Amy, pancreatic amylase; FBS, fasting blood sugar; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; sIL-2, soluble interleukin-2; AIM, apoptosis inhibitor of macrophages.

Serum AIM concentrations are higher in patients with AIP compared with the HCs and patients with PC

Subsequently, the serum AIM concentrations in patients with AIP (n=32), PC (n=30) and the HCs (n=32) were compared. The mean serum AIM concentrations were 2,387.9±1,232.1, 1,740.2±1,470.2 and 1,313.1±631.0 ng/ml in patients with AIP, PC and the HCs, respectively. The serum AIM concentrations were significantly higher in patients with AIP compared with those with PC (P<0.005) and the HCs (P<0.001) No significant differences were observed in the serum AIM levels between the patients with PC and the HCs (P=0.37) (Fig. 1).

Serum AIM concentrations before and after treatment with steroids in patients with AIP

The serum AIM concentrations were compared in patients with AIP before and after treatment with steroid (prednisolones) who were in remission during treatment (n=16). Patients in the treated AIP group exhibited significantly decreased serum AIM concentrations after treatment (before treatment, 2,499.9±1,210.5 ng/ml; after treatment, 1,913.6±924.2 ng/ml; P=0.036; Fig. 2).

Associations between AIM and various parameters

Among the laboratory parameters analyzed, serum amylase levels (ρ=0.378; P=0.043) significantly positively correlated with the serum AIM concentrations. In addition, IgG levels (ρ=0.345; P=0.057) and age (ρ=0.335; P=0.057) also positively correlated with the serum AIM concentrations. No significant correlations were observed between AIM and IgG4 (ρ=0.173; P=0.353), CRP (ρ=0.093; P=0.644) and the number of organs involved (ρ=0.186; P=0.315) (Fig. 3).

AIM expression in macrophages of pancreatic tissue from patients with AIP

Tissue sections were assessed using immunohistochemistry to determine AIM protein expression levels in patients with AIP who had undergone EUS-FNA. Inflammatory cell infiltration was evident in pancreatic tissues from patients with AIP and immunostaining demonstrated AIM protein expression in mononuclear cells. Moreover, double immunostaining for CD14 and CD16 demonstrated that AIM-positive mononuclear cells predominantly expressed CD16. These results indicated that active macrophages in the pancreas expressed AIM (Fig. 4).

Characteristics and clinical parameters of patients with IgG4-RD under various parameters (age, number of organs involved, history of malignant diseases, relapse)

The values for age (<70 and ≥70 years), number of organs involved (<2 and ≥2), a history of malignant diseases and relapse (positive or negative) and the results of their comparisons are presented in Table II, Table III, Table IV and Table V. The serum concentrations of IgG, amylase and AIM were higher in patients aged ≥70 years (Table II). Patients who had more than two organs involved had elevated levels of IgG4, fasting blood sugar and eosinophils (Table III). Patients with a history of malignancies had higher AIM levels and elevated levels of eosinophils (Table IV). The IgG4 levels did not differ significantly in terms of age (Table II) or relapse (Table V).

Table II

Comparison of baseline characteristics of patients with IgG4-RD under the parameter of age.

Table II

Comparison of baseline characteristics of patients with IgG4-RD under the parameter of age.

 Age, years 
Characteristic<70 (n=21)≥70 (n=17)P-value
No. of organs involved2.0±1.12.8±1.30.100
IgG4, mg/dl550.3±384.6740.3±452.80.196
IgG, mg/dl 2,321.3±1,192.02,748.9±734.30.042
IgG4/IgG ratio0.2±0.10.3±0.10.950
IgE, IU/l664.8±627.4 1,795.5±2,000.00.226
Amy, IU/l72.8±36.1168.6±256.60.006
P-Amy, IU/l34.5±24.7144.1±304.80.608
FBS, mg/dl126.6±46.5125.1±49.80.766
HbA1c, %6.7±1.76.3±1.20.654
CEA, ng/ml2.6±1.32.7±1.40.551
CA19-9, U/ml72.3±179.527.4±40.31.000
sIL-2 receptor, U/ml991.2±372.11381.5±596.10.133
White blood cells6,147± 1,4635,656±1,8000.470
Neutrophils3,494±1,0563,358±1,3580.755
Eosinophils219±157238±1350.614
AIM, ng/ml 2,080.8±1,293.7 5,816.2±11,839.10.034

[i] Values in bold font indicate statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Amy, amylase; P-Amy, pancreatic amylase; FBS, fasting blood sugar; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; sIL-2, soluble interleukin-2; AIM, apoptosis inhibitor of macrophages.

Table III

Comparison of baseline characteristics of patients with IgG4-RD under the parameter of number of organs involved.

Table III

Comparison of baseline characteristics of patients with IgG4-RD under the parameter of number of organs involved.

 No. of organs involved 
Characteristic<2 (n=11)≥2 (n=25)P-value
Age, years62.2±11.567.9±8.40.104
IgG4, mg/d383.5±219.9721.8±425.20.004
IgG, mg/d2,064.6±974.52,698.7±991.20.087
IgG4/IgG ratio0.2±0.10.3±0.20.098
IgE, IU/l674.2±618.3 1,228.0±1,540.00.554
Amy, IU/l94.3±33.1136.3±230.00.554
P-Amy, IU/l42.1±27.7106.0±255.70.493
FBS, mg/d100.6±23.0138.4±52.30.009
HbA1c, %6.2±1.36.6±1.60.487
CEA, ng/m2.4±0.72.7±1.50.402
CA19-9, U/m8.3±5.766.7±149.50.231
sIL-2 receptor, U/ml881.4±372.11,305.1±519.30.122
White blood cells, n5,272±12306,194±17,200.177
Neutrophils3,387±1,2443,484±1,2420.861
Eosinophils148±50253±1560.014
AIM, ng/ml 2,614.3±1,352.3 4,741.9±10,448.30.530

[i] Values in bold font indicate statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Amy, amylase; P-Amy, pancreatic amylase; FBS, fasting blood sugar; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; sIL-2, soluble interleukin-2; AIM, apoptosis inhibitor of macrophages.

Table IV

Comparison of baseline characteristics of patients with IgG4-RD under the parameter of history of malignant diseases.

Table IV

Comparison of baseline characteristics of patients with IgG4-RD under the parameter of history of malignant diseases.

 History and number of malignancies 
Characteristic(-) (n=28)(+) (n=10)P-value
No. of organs involved2.4±1.32.3±1.30.903
IgG4, mg/dl701.0± 442.5481.5±337.30.189
IgG, mg/dl2545.0±1013.22466.5±1061.00.958
IgG4/IgG ratio0.3±0.10.2±0.10.189
IgE, IU/l693.0±620.61718.0±2061.80.661
Amy, IU/l172.9±210.992.3±37.10.757
P-Amy, IU/l97.8±241.245.5±36.60.626
FBS, mg/dl116.5±38.1146.6±60.20.119
HbA1c, %6.1±0.97.3±2.10.124
CEA, ng/ml2.5±1.13.0±1.70.651
CA19-9, U/ml55.3±175.830.9±51.90.902
sIL-2 receptor, U/ml1204.1±500.71140.8±631.30.747
White blood cells5980±15535684±19130.781
Neutrophils3481±11533272±14160.815
Eosinophils192±143320±970.004
AIM, ng/ml2306.5±1385.18119.7±15727.90.049

[i] Values in bold font indicate statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Amy, amylase; P-Amy, pancreatic amylase; FBS, fasting blood sugar; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; sIL-2, soluble interleukin-2; AIM, apoptosis inhibitor of macrophages.

Table V

Comparison of baseline characteristics of patients with IgG4-RD under the parameter of disease relapse.

Table V

Comparison of baseline characteristics of patients with IgG4-RD under the parameter of disease relapse.

 No. of patients with disease relapse 
Characteristic(-) (n=22)(+) (n=8)P-value
No. of organs involved2.3±1.22.6±1.40.601
IgG4, mg/dl640.9± 398.8807.3±573.60.636
IgG, mg/dl2521.2±1026.72598.8± 1019.60.784
IgG4/IgG ratio0.2±0.10.3±0.10.469
IgE, IU/l941.3±1532.61159.0±391.70.178
Amy, IU/l93.1±35.8215.6±369.80.449
P-Amy, IU/l45.1±30.5173.9±358.50.414
FBS, mg/dl122.7±47.6135.0±45.60.297
HbA1c, %6.4±1.56.4±1.50.804
CEA, ng/ml3.1±1.41.9±0.90.041
CA19-9, U/ml53.9±161.221.4±21.00.935
sIL-2 receptor, U/ml1004.9±384.91413.8±772.10.505
White blood cells5846±14695941±19430.790
Neutrophils3401±9313797±14970.407
Eosinophils260±142201±1420.332
AIM, ng/ml4693.0±10729.32178.7±1149.80.725

[i] Values in bold font indicate statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Amy, amylase; P-Amy, pancreatic amylase; FBS, fasting blood sugar; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; sIL-2, soluble interleukin-2; AIM, apoptosis inhibitor of macrophages.

Discussion

To the best if our knowledge, this is the first investigation into serological AIM concentrations in patients with IgG4-RD/AIP. The present study found higher serum AIM concentrations in patients with AIP compared with patients with PC and the HCs. Furthermore, the serum AIM concentrations significantly decreased in patients with AIP who were in remission following treatment with steroids.

Differentiated and mature macrophages produce AIM, a secretory protein of ~50 kDa that consists of three scavenger receptor cysteine-rich domains and is named based on its function of suppressing macrophage apoptosis. AIM is an apoptosis inhibitor that supports the survival of macrophages against various apoptosis-inducing stimuli (7,8). The association between AIM and autoimmune diseases has previously been reported. Arai and Miyazaki (9) suggested that blood AIM concentrations may function as a biomarker for obesity-associated autoimmune diseases in humans, along with diabetes-associated antibodies against pancreatic β-cell antigens (including protein tyrosine phosphatase-like protein), chronic thyroiditis-associated anti-thyroid peroxidase and anti-thyroglobulin antibody. When macrophages take up oxidized low-density lipoprotein, AIM expression is induced via the activated nuclear receptors, liver X receptor/retinoid X receptor heterodimers (18,19). As a secretory protein, AIM is found in the blood and its concentration changes in response to various diseases (8,10,11). In a previous study, it was reported that there was an association between AIM and hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Therefore, it was hypothesized that the serum concentration of AIM may be a potential marker of hepatic fibrosis in chronic liver disease (12). Moreover, it has been demonstrated that AIM may function as a biomarker for distinguishing between different inflammatory bowel diseases. Furthermore, AIM is a novel biomarker of Crohn's disease, which can be used to distinguish Crohn's disease from ulcerative colitis and Behcet's disease (13). According to these aforementioned studies, as IgG4-RD and AIP are diseases that are characterized by tissue inflammation and fibrosis, it can be hypothesized that AIM may function as a diagnostic or active biomarker of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases with tissue fibrosis, such as IgG4-RD and AIP. In the present study, AIM was demonstrated to play a role as a potential biomarker for the differentiation of AIP and PC, as well as for disease activity. Furthermore, there was a significant positive correlation between AIM and amylase in the present study. Macrophages are the most abundant immune cells and play a crucial role in pancreatic tissue. Activated macrophages, which generate AIM in the pancreatic tissue, may be associated with pancreatitis and stimulate pancreatic exocrine function (20). The present study did not have height and weight data and was not able to analyze the association between AIM and BMI. This is an important point that needs to be analyzed in the future.

AIP is classified into the following three categories according to its swelling pattern: i) Diffuse; ii) focal; and iii) segmental. As the images of focal and segmental type AIP are similar to pancreatic tumors, AIP can be particularly difficult to distinguish from malignant tumors, even when using various different imaging modalities (21). Furthermore, a differential diagnosis between AIP and PC cannot be based only on serum IgG4 concentrations (22,23). Therefore, as a result of its complexity, numerous AIP cases using surgical resection as the initial treatment have been reported (24,25). Consequently, it is important to set diagnostic criteria to distinguish AIP from PC in order to avoid unnecessary invasive surgery. Therefore, a useful biomarker that can distinguish AIP from PC is required. In the present study, serum AIM concentrations in patients with AIP, PC and HCs were compared. The serum AIM concentrations were significantly higher in patients with AIP compared with HCs and patients with PC. The serum AIM concentrations may thus play a role as a potential biomarker that can distinguish between AIP and PC. The present study also obtained data on serum AIM levels in chronic pancreatitis (data not shown). The AIM value of AIP tended to be higher than that of chronic pancreatitis, although there was no significant difference. Thus, the authors aim to identify more cases in the future for further analysis.

Furthermore, the present study demonstrated that treatment with steroids significantly decreased the serum AIM concentrations in patients with AIP who were in remission. To the best of our knowledge, an association between serum AIM concentrations and treatment outcomes for other autoimmune diseases has not yet been reported. An international survey reported in 2013 demonstrated that 74% of patients with AIP were initially treated with steroids and the remission rate was 99.6% (681/684 patients) (26). However, the high relapse rate of AIP is an issue and of the 978 patients with AIP in that previous study, a total of 302 (31%) patients experienced relapse (26). It remains unknown how disease activity indexes or predictors of relapse influence parameters, such as the Crohn's disease Activity Index (CDAI) in Crohn's disease. Furthermore, there is no association between serum AIM concentrations and the CDAI in patients with Crohn's disease (13). However, the results of the present study suggested that serum AIM concentrations may potentially be an indicator of AIP.

It has previously been reported that IgG4-RD and AIP may exhibit aspects of paraneoplastic syndrome, which is an altered immune system response to a neoplasm (27-29). In the present study, 10/38 (26%) patients with IgG4-RD had a history of malignancy. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) estimate an increased risk of overall cancer in patients with IgG4-RD patients (SIR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.72-3.84) compared with the general population (30). Moreover, even though it is important to diagnose patients with IgG4-RD and AIP who have malignant diseases as it affects prognosis, the clinical characteristics remain unclear (31). AIM is also associated with certain malignancies (32). In the present study, the serum AIM concentrations were significantly higher in patients with IgG4-RD and a history of malignancies. These results suggest that the serum AIM concentrations may potentially serve as a biomarker to predict malignant disease in patients with IgG4-RD and AIP.

In the present study AIM expression in active macrophages in pancreatic tissues was demonstrated. Moreover, as macrophages play a crucial role in IgG4-RD (33), it can be hypothesized that AIM, which is produced by resident macrophages in pancreatic tissues, contributes to pancreatic inflammation and fibrosis, which may result in elevated serum AIM concentrations. However, there are limitations to the present study as it used a single-center design and only a small number of patients were enrolled. Therefore, a larger sample size should be used in future studies.

In conclusion, in the present study, serological AIM concentrations were significantly higher in patients with IgG4-RD/AIP compared with patients with PC. Furthermore, serum AIM concentrations decreased in patients treated with steroids who were in remission. The results of the present study suggest that serum AIM concentrations may potentially serve as a precise diagnostic and therapeutic biomarker in patients with IgG4-RD/AIP.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

ST drafted the manuscript. ST, SK and AI were substantial contributions to the conception or design of the study, the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data for the work, the drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content. MH, SA, FS and SH contributed to the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data, as well as the in writing and revision of the manuscript. SK and ST confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written, informed consent was obtained from all patients. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kagoshima University Medical and Dental Hospital (Kagoshima, Japan; approval no. 28-241). All experimental procedures were performed according to the Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects outlined in the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Yoshida K, Toki F, Takeuchi T, Watanabe S, Shiratori K and Hayashi N: Chronic pancreatitis caused by an autoimmune abnormality. Proposal of the concept of autoimmune pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci. 40:1561–1568. 1995.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Hamano H, Kawa S, Horiuchi A, Unno H, Furuya N, Akamatsu T, Fukushima M, Nikaido T, Nakayama K, Usuda N and Kiyosawa K: High serum IgG4 concentrations in patients with sclerosing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 344:732–738. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Stone JH, Zen Y and Deshpande V: IgG4-related disease. N Engl J Med. 366:539–551. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Kamisawa T, Zen Y, Pillai S and Stone JH: IgG4-related disease. Lancet. 385:1460–1471. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Kamisawa T, Funata N, Hayashi Y, Eishi Y, Koike M, Tsuruta K, Okamoto A, Egawa N and Nakajima H: A new clinicopathological entity of IgG4-related autoimmune disease. J Gastroenterol. 38:982–984. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Masamune A, Kikuta K, Hamada S, Tsuji I, Takeyama Y, Shimosegawa T and Okazaki K: Collaborators. Nationwide epidemiological survey of autoimmune pancreatitis in Japan in 2016. J Gastroenterol. 55:462–470. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Miyazaki T, Hirokami Y, Matsuhashi N, Takatsuka H and Naito M: Increased susceptibility of thymocytes to apoptosis in mice lacking AIM, a novel murine macrophage-derived soluble factor belonging to the scavenger receptor cysteine-rich domain superfamily. J Exp Med. 189:413–422. 1999.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Mori M, Kimura H, Iwamura Y, Arai S and Miyazaki T: Modification of N-glycosylation modulates the secretion and lipolytic function of apoptosis inhibitor of macrophage (AIM). FEBS Lett. 586:3569–3574. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Arai S and Miyazaki T: Impacts of the apoptosis inhibitor of macrophage (AIM) on obesity-associated inflammatory diseases. Semin Immunopathol. 36:3–12. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Arai S, Shelton JM, Chen M, Bradley MN, Castrillo A, Bookout AL, Mak PA, Edwards PA, Mangelsdorf DJ, Tontonoz P, et al: A role for the apoptosis inhibitory factor AIM/Spα/Api6 in atherosclerosis development. Cell Metab. 1:201–213. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Gangadharan B, Antrobus R, Dwek RA and Zitzmann N: Novel serum biomarker candidates for liver fibrosis in hepatitis C patients. Clin Chem. 53:1792–1799. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Mera K, Uto H, Mawatari S, Ido A, Yoshimine Y, Nosaki T, Oda K, Tabu K, Kumagai K, Tamai T, et al: Serum levels of apoptosis inhibitor of macrophage are associated with hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. BMC Gastroenterol. 14(27)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Ono Y, Kanmura S, Morinaga Y, Oda K, Kawabata K, Arima S, Sasaki F, Nasu Y, Tanoue S, Hashimoto S, et al: The utility of apoptosis inhibitor of macrophages as a possible diagnostic marker in patients with Crohn's disease. BMC Gastroenterol. 17(40)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Okazaki K, Kawa S, Kamisawa T, Naruse S, Tanaka S, Nishimori I, Ohara H, Ito T, Kiriyama S, Inui K, et al: Clinical diagnostic criteria of autoimmune pancreatitis: Revised proposal. J Gastroenterol. 41:626–631. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Shimosegawa T, Okazaki K, Kamisawa T, Kawa S and Notohara K: International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis-Guidelines of the International Association of Pancreatology. Suizo. 26:684–698. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Umehara H, Okazaki K, Masaki Y, Kawano M, Yamamoto M, Saeki T, Matsui S, Yoshino T, Nakamura S, Kawa S, et al: Comprehensive diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD), 2011. Mod Rheumatol. 22:21–30. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Inoue D, Yoshida K, Yoneda N, Ozaki K, Matsubara T, Nagai K, Okumura K, Toshima F, Toyama J, Minami T, et al: IgG4-related disease: Dataset of 235 consecutive patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 94(e680)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Joseph SB, Bradley MN, Castrillo A, Bruhn KW, Mak PA, Pei L, Hogenesch J, O'connell RM, Cheng G, Saez E, et al: LXR-dependent gene expression is important for macrophage survival and the innate immune response. Cell. 119:299–309. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Valledor AF, Hsu LC, Ogawa S, Sawka-Verhelle D, Karin M and Glass CK: Activation of liver X receptors and retinoid X receptors prevents bacterial-induced macrophage apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:17813–17818. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Wu J, Zhang L, Shi J, He R, Yang W, Habtezion A, Niu N, Lu P and Xue J: Macrophage phenotypic switch orchestrates the inflammation and repair/regeneration following acute pancreatitis injury. EBioMedicine. 58(102920)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Sun GF, Zuo CJ, Shao CW, Wang JH and Zhang J: Focal autoimmune pancreatitis: Radiological characteristics help to distinguish from pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 19:3634–3641. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Kamisawa T, Takuma K, Tabata T, Inaba Y, Egawa N, Tsuruta K, Hishima T, Sasaki T and Itoi T: Serum IgG4-negative autoimmune pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol. 46:108–116. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Ghazale A, Chari ST, Smyrk TC, Levy MJ, Topazian MD, Takahashi N, Clain JE, Pearson RK, Pelaez-Luna M, Petersen BT, et al: Value of serum IgG4 in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis and in distinguishing it from pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 102:1646–1653. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Weber SM, Cubukcu-Dimopulo O, Palesty JA, Suriawinata A, Klimstra D, Brennan MF and Conlon K: Lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis: Inflammatory mimic of pancreatic carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 7:129–139. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Hardacre JM, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Sohn TA, Abraham SC, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Choti MA, Campbell KA, Schulick RD, Hruban RH, et al: Results of pancreaticoduodenectomy for lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis. Ann Surg. 237:853–859. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Hart PA, Kamisawa T, Brugge WR, Chung JB, Culver EL, Czakó L, Frulloni L, Go VL, Gress TM, Kim MH, et al: Long-term outcomes of autoimmune pancreatitis: A multicentre, international analysis. Gut. 62:1771–1776. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Okamoto A, Watanabe T, Kamata K, Minaga K and Kudo M: Recent updates on the relationship between cancer and autoimmune pancreatitis. Intern Med. 58:1533–1539. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Tang H, Yang H, Zhang P, Wu D, Zhang S, Zhao J, Peng L, Chen H, Fei Y, Zhang X, et al: Malignancy and IgG4-related disease: The incidence, related factors and prognosis from a prospective cohort study in China. Sci Rep. 10:1–7. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Haghbin H, Chuang J, Fatima R, Zakirkhodjaev N, Lee-Smith W and Aziz M: Correlation of autoimmune pancreatitis and malignancy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 67:3252–3264. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Yu T, Wu Y, Liu J, Zhuang Y, Jin X and Wang L: The risk of malignancy in patients with IgG4-related disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Res Ther. 24:1–9. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Yamamoto M, Takahashi H, Tabeya T, Suzuki C, Naishiro Y, Ishigami K, Yajima H, Shimizu Y, Obara M, Yamamoto H, et al: Risk of malignancies in IgG4-related disease. Mod Rheumatol. 22:414–418. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Koyama N, Yamazaki T, Kanetsuki Y, Hirota J, Asai T, Mitsumoto Y, Mizuno M, Shima T, Kanbara Y, Arai S, et al: Activation of apoptosis inhibitor of macrophage is a sensitive diagnostic marker for NASH-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol. 53:770–779. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Furukawa S, Moriyama M, Tanaka A, Maehara T, Tsuboi H, Iizuka M, Hayashida JN, Ohta M, Saeki T, Notohara K, et al: Preferential M2 macrophages contribute to fibrosis in IgG4-related dacryoadenitis and sialoadenitis, so-called Mikulicz's disease. Clin Immunol. 156:9–18. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

October-2022
Volume 17 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 2049-9434
Online ISSN:2049-9442

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Tanoue S, Kanmura S, Hinokuchi M, Arima S, Sasaki F, Hashimoto S and Ido A: Role of apoptosis inhibitor of macrophages in patients with IgG4‑related disease/autoimmune pancreatitis and the clinical characteristics associated with this condition. Biomed Rep 17: 82, 2022
APA
Tanoue, S., Kanmura, S., Hinokuchi, M., Arima, S., Sasaki, F., Hashimoto, S., & Ido, A. (2022). Role of apoptosis inhibitor of macrophages in patients with IgG4‑related disease/autoimmune pancreatitis and the clinical characteristics associated with this condition. Biomedical Reports, 17, 82. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2022.1565
MLA
Tanoue, S., Kanmura, S., Hinokuchi, M., Arima, S., Sasaki, F., Hashimoto, S., Ido, A."Role of apoptosis inhibitor of macrophages in patients with IgG4‑related disease/autoimmune pancreatitis and the clinical characteristics associated with this condition". Biomedical Reports 17.4 (2022): 82.
Chicago
Tanoue, S., Kanmura, S., Hinokuchi, M., Arima, S., Sasaki, F., Hashimoto, S., Ido, A."Role of apoptosis inhibitor of macrophages in patients with IgG4‑related disease/autoimmune pancreatitis and the clinical characteristics associated with this condition". Biomedical Reports 17, no. 4 (2022): 82. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2022.1565