Open Access

Intronic hexanucleotide repeat expansion in TYMS in monozygotic twins with congenital progressive universal melanosis

  • Authors:
    • Sunisa Kanchanasutthiyakorn
    • Sakchai Chaiyamahapurk
    • Siraprapa Tongkobpetch
    • Kanokwan Santawong
    • Chalurmpon Srichomthong
    • Tippayakarn Klomchan
    • Chaiyaporn Virochsangaroon
    • Monnat Pongpanich
    • Prateep Warnnissorn
    • Sutatip Pongcharoen
    • Vorasuk Shotelersuk
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: June 12, 2025     https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2025.2016
  • Article Number: 138
  • Copyright: © Kanchanasutthiyakorn et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Hyperpigmentation presents a diverse clinical spectrum, largely influenced by genetic factors that remain incompletely understood. The present study describes a case of monozygotic twin girls aged 15 years with congenital progressive universal melanosis (CPUM) born to non‑consanguineous unaffected parents. CPUM represents a novel clinical entity characterized by progressive widespread hyperpigmentation beginning at birth, without other accompanying symptoms. Skin biopsy and histopathological analysis were performed, followed by long‑read whole‑genome sequencing and short tandem repeat analysis. Gene expression was evaluated using reverse transcription‑PCR, and protein levels were assessed by western blotting in cultured skin fibroblasts from the twins and unaffected controls. Long‑read genome sequencing revealed a biallelic GATGGT repeat expansion of 210‑259 repeat units within the third intron of the thymidylate synthase (TYMS) gene in both twins, whereas their parents were heterozygous. Controls (n=236), derived from the in‑house long‑read sequencing database at Excellence Center for Genomics and Precision Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, carried the GATGGT repeat in the 42‑172 range. No single nucleotide or structural variants or copy number variations were present in both affected individuals and absent in the unaffected parents. RNA and protein levels of TYMS using cultured skin fibroblasts from both twins showed no discernible differences compared with controls. Fibroblasts were used due to their accessibility via skin biopsy and their role in skin pigmentation through paracrine signaling to melanocytes. More relevant cells, such as melanocytes or keratinocytes, may be required to exhibit such changes, as these cells are directly involved in melanin production and skin pigmentation. TYMS is implicated in skin pigmentation in normal physiological process and in disorders manifesting abnormal skin pigmentation, such as dyskeratosis congenita. The present findings imply a connection between the identified repeat expansion in TYMS and CPUM, underscoring the need for further investigations to elucidate its causal association.

Introduction

Hyperpigmentation disorders are conditions characterized by the darkening of the skin due to excessive melanin production or deposition. Such disorders are categorized into three types: Diffuse, linear and reticulated (1). Diffuse hyperpigmentation refers to a condition characterized by the widespread darkening of the skin, often affecting multiple areas of the body, including acquired universal melanosis (AUM), erythema dyschromicum perstans (EDP), lichen planus pigmentosus (LPP), familial progressive hyperpigmentation (FPH), post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation and drug-induced hyperpigmentation (2-4). Linear hyperpigmentation presents darkened streaks or lines on the skin that follow a linear pattern. This includes flagellate pigmentation, pigmentary demarcation lines, linear and whorled nevoid hypermelanosis and incontinentia pigmenti (5). Reticulated hyperpigmentation refers to a pattern of darkened patches on the skin that form a net- or lace-like appearance and includes dyskeratosis congenita, prurigo pigmentosa, dermatopathia pigmentosa reticularis, Dowling-Degos disease and reticulate acropigmentation of Kitamura (6). The causes of hyperpigmentation are diverse, encompassing genetic factors, hormonal changes, sun exposure, inflammation, certain medications, and underlying medical conditions (7,8).

Although many hyperpigmentation disorders are rare, available epidemiological data provide varying estimates of prevalence across the three clinical types: diffuse, linear, and reticulated. Among diffuse hyperpigmentation disorders, Addison's disease, an acquired condition caused by adrenal insufficiency, has a reported prevalence of 100-140 cases per million in Europe and North America (9,10). In contrast, genetic causes of diffuse hyperpigmentation are much rarer. For example, dyschromatosis universalis hereditaria, which may be inherited in an autosomal dominant or recessive manner and is associated with mutations in ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 6 (ABCB6), SAM and SH3 domain containing 1 (SASH1), or KIT ligand (KITLG), has an estimated prevalence of approximately 0.3 per 100,000 individuals (11,12). Another rare diffuse condition, FPH, has been reported in only 9 cases worldwide (13). Reticulated hyperpigmentation is seen in disorders such as DC, which is associated with mutations in genes involved in telomere maintenance, including dyskerin pseudouridine synthase 1, telomerase RNA component (TERC), and regulator of telomere elongation helicase 1 and is estimated to occur in fewer than 1 per 1,000,000 individuals (14). DPR has only 20 cases reported globally, while reticulate acropigmentation of Kitamura has 130 documented cases worldwide (13). Linear hyperpigmentation disorders are also rare. IP, a well-characterized example, is an X-linked dominant disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase regulatory subunit gamma (IKBKG) gene. It primarily affects females and is typically lethal in males. In European populations, the estimated birth prevalence of IP is ~1.2 per 100,000 live births (13). Given the rarity and genetic complexity of these conditions, especially those with suspected Mendelian inheritance, advanced genomic approaches are essential for elucidating their molecular basis.

Next-generation sequencing technologies have revolutionized genomic research by enabling high-throughput sequencing and comprehensive DNA sequence analysis. Among these, long-read whole-genome sequencing is advantageous owing to its ability to generate long contiguous sequences of DNA (15). This technology excels in resolving complex genomic regions, including structural variants (SVs), repetitive sequences and intricate genomic rearrangements that short-read sequencing methods often miss or inaccurately characterize (16,17). The present study used PacBio long-read whole-genome sequencing to ensure a complete and accurate genome representation.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the genetic basis of a rare congenital hyperpigmentation disorder in monozygotic twins.

Materials and methods

Skin biopsy and histopathological study

The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University (Bangkok, Thailand (approval no. 264/62) and conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments, as well as all relevant ethical guidelines and regulations. The rights and interests of all participants were fully protected. Fifteen-year-old monozygotic twin girls with generalized hyperpigmentation presented in April 2019 at Khanu Woralaksaburi Hospital, Kamphaeng Phet, Thailand were referred to Naresuan University Hospital, Phitsanulok, Thailand. Both parents of the patients were aged 56 years. Skin biopsy was performed on the abdomen of both twins for histopathological study, diagnosis and fibroblast culture. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the patients. Tissue was fixed in 10% formaldehyde at room temperature for 24 h, followed by tissue processing which included dehydration through a graded ascending ethanol series, clearing in xylene, and embedding in paraffin. Paraffin-embedded tissues were then sectioned at 4-5 µm thickness for histological analysis. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed at room temperature following deparaffinization in xylene, rehydration through graded descending ethanol, staining with Harris's hematoxylin for 7.5 min, bluing with lithium carbonate, counterstaining with eosin for 1 min, followed by dehydration and clearing. Sections were imaged using an Olympus BX50 light microscope (Olympus Corporation), with image capture via Olympus cellSens Standard software v1.3 (evidentscientific.com/en/products/software/cellsens).

Clinical laboratory tests

As part of the clinical work-up, both twins underwent a physical examination, electrocardiogram (ECG), and routine laboratory testing, including a complete blood count (CBC) and morning serum cortisol assessment, performed at Naresuan University Hospital, Phitsanulok, Thailand. A standard-dose (250 µg) adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test was performed in the morning between 08:00 and 09:00 to account for diurnal variation in cortisol secretion. A baseline blood sample was collected for measurement of serum cortisol and 17-hydroxyprogesterone prior to ACTH administration. Subsequently, 250 µg of cosyntropin was administered intravenously, followed by blood sampling at 30 and 60 min post-injection to assess stimulated cortisol and 17-OHP levels. Serum cortisol levels were analyzed using the electrochemiluminescence immunoassay method. The reference range was 6.2-19.4 µg/dl in the morning and 2.3-11.9 µg/dl in the afternoon. Serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone levels were analyzed using the radioimmunoassay (RIA) method, with a reference range of 0.10-1.50 ng/ml.

Whole genome long-read sequencing and data processing

Genomic DNA was obtained from both twins and their parents, extracted from leucocytes using a Gentra Puregene Blood kit (Qiagen GmbH) and sheared using a Megaruptor 2 long hydropore to obtain DNA fragments of 15 kb. DNA fragments were analyzed using a Qubit fluorometer and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. DNA fragments (2-5 µg) were prepared using the SMRTbell Express Template Prep kit 2.0 (cat. no. P/N 100-938-900) and SMRTbell Enzyme Clean-up kit 2.0 (cat. no. P/N 101-932-600; both Pacific Biosciences). Fragments <10 kb were eliminated using BluePippin (Sage Science). SMRTbell libraries were sequenced on the Sequel II system using Sequel II sequencing kit 2.0 (cat. no. P/N 101-820-200; Pacific Biosciences) and raw subreads were processed through the circular consensus sequencing (CCS) workflow using PacBio SMRTLink version 10.0 (pacb.com/products-and-services/analytical-software/smrt-analysis) to generate high fidelity (HiFi) long reads, in which both DNA strands were sequenced multiple times due to the circular nature of the template, achieving a minimum estimated quality value of 20 (phred-scaled, corresponding to an accuracy of 99%). All samples were aligned to the GRCh38 human reference genome using pbmm2 v1.9.0 (github.com/PacificBiosciences/pbmm2). The aligned CCS binary alignment map data were used for small variant, SV and copy number variant (CNV) detection.

Short tandem repeat (STR) analysis

FASTQ files, generated from long-read whole-genome sequencing, were aligned to GRCh38 using LAST v1418 tool (18), yielding a MAF file. The MAF file was then used by tandem-genotypes v1.1.0(19) to predict STR unit change of each read in relative to repeat unit in the reference genome. The repeat unit change was estimated in the twins, parents and 236 unaffected controls from the in-house database at Excellence Center for Genomics and Precision Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. This database contains long-read sequencing data from patients with various genetic conditions, as well as from parents or siblings of certain probands. Importantly, the 236 samples designated as controls did not include individuals with pigmentation disorder. Next, STRs were identified using an in-house algorithm. Repeat patterns with 2-6 bases were selected to calculate distributions of repeat unit using kernel density estimation. Gaussian kernel with a bandwidth of five was selected to smooth the estimated density curve. Minimum points were used at the curve to cluster the data. For autosomal dominance mode, STRs exhibiting expansion only in the twins but not in their parents and controls, were searched. For autosomal recessive mode, expansion in both twins and parents but not in controls were searched. STRs were further reviewed for their relevance to the disease by examining genomic context, literature on disease association and predicted effects on gene function or expression. Analysis of single nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertions and deletions (Indels), SV, CNV and methylation profile is described in the Data S1.

Kinship analysis

Kinship coefficient was estimated using kinship-based inference from the KING package v2.3.2, based on genotype data derived from whole-genome sequencing (20). Relatedness was inferred based on estimated kinship coefficients using the following classification: Kinship coefficient >0.354 indicates duplicates or monozygotic twins, where (0.177, 0.354), (0.0884, 0177) and (0.0442, 0.0884) indicate first-second- and third-degree relatives, respectively.

Cell culture

Fibroblast cells were acquired from skin biopsies of two affected twins carrying the TYMS variant and four unaffected individuals who were not in the in-house database. The controls included three males and one female, all pediatric donors aged 1-5 years, with no history of pigmentation disorder or related skin conditions. The cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (both Cytiva; HyClone) and 1X antibiotic-antimycotic (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and then incubated at 37˚C with 5% CO2 (21). The use of primary human cells in cell culture experiments was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University (approval no. 813/63).

Reverse transcription-quantitative (RT-q)PCR-based mRNA quantification

RNA was extracted from fibroblasts and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) using the QIAamp RNA Blood Mini kit (Qiagen GmbH). PBMC controls included both parents of the twins and one unrelated 45-year-old adult female, all without any history of pigmentation disorders or related skin conditions. These PBMC controls were independent from the aforementioned fibroblast controls. cDNA was prepared from 1 µg RNA using the ImProm-II™ RT System (Promega Corporation) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The input RNA from fibroblasts was primed with an equal mix of anchored dT oligonucleotides for reverse-transcribing RNA to cDNA. TaqMan probes specific for TYMS (cat. no. Hs00426586_m1) and β-actin (Assay ID: Hs01060665_g1) were used, and all reactions were set up with Luna® Universal Probe qPCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs). A total of three replicates/sample were run for both TYMS and β-actin on the Applied Biosystems StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and the results were analyzed using StepOne Software v2.3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). qPCR thermocycling conditions were as follows: Initial denaturation at 95˚C for 60 sec, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95˚C for 15 sec and extension at 60˚C for 30 sec. The expression of the gene of interest (TYMS) was normalized against the control gene (β-actin), and the relative change between affected and controls was analyzed using the 2-ΔΔCq method (22).

Protein expression analysis by western blotting

To assess TYMS expression, western blot analysis was performed. Briefly, protein lysate was prepared from fibroblast cells using radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer supplemented with protease inhibitors (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.). The protein concentration was determined using a Bicinchoninic Acid Protein Assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Equal amounts of protein (50 µg/lane) were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE. The proteins were transferred onto a PVDF membrane using iBlot™ 2 Transfer Stacks (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk and 1% BSA in TBS for 1 h at room temperature to prevent non-specific binding. Subsequently, the membrane was incubated overnight at 4˚C with the primary antibody against TYMS (1:500; cat. no. HL1236; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). After washing with 0.1% TBST, the membrane was incubated with the corresponding anti-rabbit IgG, horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:2,000; cat. no. 7074; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) for 3 h at room temperature. TYMS protein bands were visualized at 34 kDa using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection SuperSignal™ West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and chemiluminescent signals were visualized and quantified using the ImageQuant™ LAS 4000 system (version 1.3; GE Healthcare Life Sciences). The relative protein expression levels were normalized to the housekeeping gene β-actin (13E5) Rabbit mAb (1:1,000, Cat. No. 7087; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.).

Results

Clinical characterization of twins

The twins had a kinship coefficient of 0.4934, confirming their monozygosity and ensuring that the sequencing data accurately corresponded to them. Both twins exhibited progressive skin darkening since birth, with strikingly similar pigmentation patterns. Both twins were healthy without any other symptoms. They were born to non-consanguineous parents with normal skin color and no family history of hyperpigmentation disorder. No history of drug intake or urine discoloration or photosensitivity was reported. The date of admission was April 2019 for adrenal insufficiency workup, which yielded a negative result. The patients were referred to a dermatologist. The first skin biopsy was performed in September 2019 for histopathological examination, followed by a second biopsy ~6 months later to obtain fibroblasts for cell culture. There was no subsequent follow-up.

On examination, both twins had generalized, diffuse, dark-black hyperpigmentation of the skin on the face, neck, body, hands and feet (Fig. 1A-D) and some reticulate hypopigmentation and hyperpigmentation were found on the abdomen. Hyperpigmentation was prominent on the distal finger and feet. Tongue and buccal mucosa also exhibited some hyperpigmentation. The hair and nails were normal.

Skin biopsy from the right trunk revealed increased melanin pigmentation in basal and suprabasal layers and presence of melanophages in upper dermis. These melanophages were identified as large, round or oval cells with abundant cytoplasmic melanin granules, giving them a dark brown/black appearance under the microscope. Additionally, no melanocyte proliferation was observed, based on the absence of increased melanocyte density or atypical melanocytic nests in the basal epidermis (Fig. 1E). Physical examination of both twins revealed no abnormality aside from hyperpigmentation. Electrocardiogram results were normal. Complete blood count showed mild anemia with hematocrit 31.7% and no macrocytosis. Cortisol levels in the morning and ACTH stimulation test results were normal, thus, excluding Addison's disease.

Sequencing output

HiFi reads were mapped on the GRCh38 human reference genome. The mean breadth of coverage of the four samples was 97.19% (range, 95.08-98.94%). The average sequencing depth of the four samples was 28X (range, 26-31X).

Variant analysis. SNV/Indel analysis

Variants were filtered based on inheritance pattern. The number of concordant SNVs (twins have the same genotype) and Indels between twins from DeepVariant was 7,030,746. There were 29,137 autosomal dominant de novo variants, 236,591 autosomal recessive variants and 28,108,264 pairs of compound heterozygous variants. In the first approach, two de novo and two pairs of compound heterozygous variants were classified as likely pathogenic and frameshift mutations, according to Franklin by Genoox. However, those variants were regarded as false positives after visually inspecting BAM files with Integrative Genomics Viewer v2.15.4(23).

In the second approach, one autosomal recessive was identified in phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class B (PIGB) (c.981T>G), which was a missense variant. This variant was absent in the in-house database but present in controls in gnomAD database. The gene constraint score of the c.981T>G variant indicated a tolerance to variation. Based on the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), PIGB (c.981T>G) variant was classified as benign. Moreover, eight compound heterozygous variants which were missense variants in myosin heavy chain 13 (MYH13) (c.53G>A and c.791A>G), serpin family H member 1 (SERPINH1) (c.293G>A and c.1066G>A), myosin VIIA (MYO7A) (c.781G>A and c.4349A>G), UDP glucuronosyltransferase family 1 member A1 (UGT1A1) (c.1459C>T and c.964A>G), keratin 36 (KRT36) (c.122G>A and c.677G>T), tectonin β-propeller repeat containing 1 (TECPR1) (c.2270C>A and c.577G>A), tripartite motif containing 10 (TRIM10) (c.842G>A and c.977C>T), and missense and intronic variants in cholinergic receptor nicotinic epsilon subunit (CHRNE) (c.1375T>C and c.917+562T>C) were identified (Table SI). Despite their absence in the in-house database and controls in gnomAD database, the gene constraint score of all variants indicated tolerance to variation. Based on ACMG guidelines, compound heterozygous variants were classified as variants of uncertain significance.

SV analysis. The number of concordant SVs between twins from pbsv was 73,948 variants, of which 69,106 passed quality control and were filtered based on inheritance pattern, yielding 157 de novo and 2,267 autosomal recessive variants. No compound heterozygous variants were retained. In the first approach, no pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were found. In the second approach, two autosomal recessive variants in the solute carrier family 22 member 31 (SLC22A31) and a region from sialic acid binding Ig like lectin 14 (SIGLEC14) to SIGLEC5 were obtained. After inspecting BAM files, these SVs were true positives; however, they were not rare (frequency >1% in the in-house genome database) in Thai individuals. Therefore, no SVs were considered to be associated with the phenotype.

CNV analysis. No CNVs were phenotype-associated. Copy numbers that were different from both parents were identified in 13 regions. After annotating the regions with ClassifyCNV, eight regions were predicted as uncertain significance (four of which were located within or overlapped protein-coding genes) and five were predicted as benign. After checking the copy number in these regions in the in-house database, all regions were ruled out since allele frequency was >1%.

Methylation profile analysis

The present study identified 211 DMRs, of which 161 resided in 143 genes and 50 DMRs were not in genes. The annotation showed that 51.66, 18.01, 12.32, 10.90, 5.69 and 1.42% were in the promoter (≤2kb), distal intergenic, intron, exon, promoter (2-3 kb) and 3' untranslated region. respectively. After performing biological function prediction, 35 significant terms were identified (Table SII). However, the significant enrichments were not related to skin pigmentation or melanogenesis.

STR analysis

After starting with 718,245 repeat patterns, filtering for STR motifs 2-6 base pairs in length, resulting in 240,677 patterns. Results from the in-house algorithm returned eight candidate patterns. Only one pattern (GATGGT) was consistent with autosomal recessive inheritance, whereas other patterns were not consistent between phenotype and mode of inheritance. There was a biallelic GATGGT repeat expansion with a range of 210-259 repeats in intron 3 of TYMS in both twins (Fig. 2A), whereas the parents exhibited a heterozygous expansion. The father had 106 repeat units in one allele and 230-245 repeat units expanded in the other allele. The mother had 93 repeat units in one allele and 217-224 repeat units expanded in the other allele compared with the reference genome (data not shown). The 236 controls had ≤172 repeat units (Fig. 2B). The majority of controls (47%; 112/236) had 106 repeat units. All controls with 172 repeat units carried the expansion on a single allele only. No homozygous controls were identified, unlike in the twins.

Determination of the TYMS mRNA and protein expression

RT-qPCR was used to investigate the expression levels of TYMS in identical twin patients. RNA was extracted from cultured skin fibroblasts and PBMCs. The mean TYMS expression levels in the patients (PBMCs, 0.74 and 0.76; skin fibroblasts, 0.91 and 1.03) were within the range observed in control samples (PBMCs, 0.30-1.00; skin fibroblasts, 0.47-1.41; Figs. 3A and S1). No apparent differences were observed in either cell type. Protein was extracted from cultured skin fibroblasts. The western blot analysis showed that TYMS protein levels varied between the two probands, with twin A showing lower expression than twin B. Overall, the levels observed in both twins were within the range seen in control samples (Fig. 3B, S2 and S3).

Discussion

The present study reported monozygotic twin girls with distinct types of diffuse hyperpigmentation. Both had hyperpigmentation on the trunk, although some areas showed reticulated hypo- and hyperpigmentation, which differs from the pigmentation of Addison's disease, which is most intense in the flexures, at sites of pressure and friction and in the creases of the palms and soles (9,24). Moreover, the investigation for Addison's disease showed negative results. Unlike other diffuse hyperpigmentation disorders, the present condition was characterized by a congenital onset, progressive maturation and absence of accompanying symptoms. By contrast with the acquired onset in AUM (25), localized ashy-gray patches in EDP (26), pruritus and sun-exposed areas in LPP (27) and irregular patches and specific area involvement in FPH (28), the twins exhibited symptom-free, whole-body pigmentation. This distinct presentation suggests a novel entity in the spectrum of diffuse hyperpigmentation disorders.

Single gene disorders, such as X-linked recessive hyperpigmentation, Dowling-Degos disease, dyschromatosis universalis hereditarian and Kitamura disease, have reticulate lesions and other signs and symptoms (29-32). For example, a case report of hyperpigmentation in a Taiwanese child demonstrated an inborn error of vitamin B12 metabolism with identification of a homozygous mutation in ATP binding cassette subfamily D member 4 (c.423C>G; p.Asn141Lys) (33). Due to these distinguished features, the present condition was termed congenital progressive universal melanosis (CPUM).

In the present case, the condition was similar to AUM, also known as carbon baby syndrome (diffuse hyperpigmentation subtype). To the best of our knowledge, only a few reports of AUM have been published (25,34-46). In patients with AUM, pigmentation of basal and suprabasal layers is increased without melanocyte proliferation (44). Histopathological examination of the present patients also showed these traits but hyperpigmentation was congenital. The present patients presented with heavily pigmented areas especially on the lips, tongue, knuckles and feet, with generalized hypopigmented patches around the abdomen. Electrocardiogram test, serum cortisol, ACTH stimulation and physical examination results were within normal limits and no retinitis pigmentosa was detected. Patients had no history of drug intake and no family history of hyperpigmentation or associated conditions. While melanin production regulation, excessive production of β melanocyte-stimulating hormone, abnormal sensitivity of melanocytes or neural stimuli may be involved in AUM (46), the actual etiology of AUM is yet to be elucidated.

The present study performed long-read genome sequencing owing to its ability to provide a more comprehensive and accurate representation of the genome than short-read sequencing. SNV/Indel, SV, CNV, methylation profile and STR filtering were performed, focusing on variants present in both affected individuals and absent in the unaffected parents. A total of eight variants from the SNV/Indel analysis and a novel unreported biallelic repeat expansion in the third intron of the TYMS gene from the STR analysis were found. No pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified in other variant classes.

The eight SNV/Indel pairs of variants were found in eight genes. Mutations of the five genes (UGT1A1, SERPINH1, CHRNE, TRIM10 and MYO7A) have been linked to human disorders, but none of the disorders manifest as abnormal skin pigmentation. Specifically, UGT1A1 mutation causes Crigler-Najjar syndrome (47), whereas SERPINH1 mutations result in osteogenesis imperfecta due to abnormal collagen biosynthesis (48). CHRNE mutations lead to congenital myasthenic syndrome (49) and TRIM10 mutation is associated with nephronophthisis (50). Additionally, a mutation in MYO7A causes non-syndromic hearing loss (51). To the best of our knowledge, for the remaining three genes, MYH13, KRT36 and TECPR1, no disease has yet been directly associated. However, MYH13 is associated with muscle contraction (52). KRT36 is a member of the keratin gene family involved in hair and nail formation (53) and TECPR1 serves a role in autophagy (54). Given the functions and associated conditions of these genes, no candidate gene among the SNV/Indel variants appeared to be responsible for causing CPUM.

An unreported biallelic GATGGT hexanucleotide repeat expansion in the third intron of the TYMS gene was identified from the STR analysis in the twins, with 210-159 repeat units (124 repeat units of the hexanucleotide repeats are present in the human reference genome hg38). The father and mother each had one non-expanded allele, with the other allele measuring 230-245 units in the father and 217-224 units in the mother. A total of 206 controls carried the GATGGT repeat in a range of 42 to 172 and almost half of the controls had 106 units. The repeat expansion was present in both alleles of the affected twins and heterozygous state in each parent, consistent with an autosomal recessive mode of inheritance.

The TYMS gene catalyzes the methylation of deoxyuridine monophosphate to form deoxythymidine monophosphate by transferring a methyl group from 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate. This conversion is key for maintaining the balance of nucleotides necessary for DNA replication and repair (55). Dysregulation of TYMS expression causes DNA damage, leading to defective DNA synthesis. This triggers cell stress responses, including activation of the tumor suppressor protein p53 and potentially increasing microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) expression (56). MITF activation upregulates both tyrosinase and associated proteins, resulting in increasing melanin synthesis (57,58). Therefore, TYMS may indirectly influence skin pigmentation via its involvement in DNA repair mechanisms. Hyperpigmentation can arise from genes involved in DNA repair or early senescence (58). A total of >150 DNA damage repair genes, including TYMS, have been identified in the hallmark gene set of the Molecular Signatures Database as playing a role in DNA repair mechanisms (59).

Digenic germline variants in both TYMS and enolase superfamily member 1 result in dyskeratosis congenita (DC) (60). In the aforementioned study, RT-qPCR analysis revealed a significantly reduced expression of TYMS in lymphoblastoid cells derived from affected probands compared with controls. TYMS deficiency due to loss-of-function missense mutations disrupts the nucleotide metabolism resulting in genome instability, which was measured by the level of protein associated with DNA damage. Clinical manifestations of DC include abnormal skin pigmentation, nail dystrophy and oral leucoplakia. This suggests that the abnormal skin pigmentation in DC is a result of genome instability. Certain mutations in TYMS causing a dysmorphic syndrome may lead to non-syndromic anomaly. For example, p63 mutations cause Mendelian clefting syndromes, including ectrodactyly-ectodermal dysplasia-clefting syndrome [Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM no. #129900)], ankyloblepharon-ectodermal dysplasiaclefting syndrome (OMIM #106260) and RappHodgkin syndrome (OMIM #129400), while some missense mutations can lead to non-syndromic cleft lip and palate (61). Therefore, it was hypothesized that since DC, a syndrome with hyperpigmentation, can be caused by certain forms of genetic variants in TYMS, another form of genetic variant in the same gene may lead to non-syndromic hyperpigmentation.

The present study attempted to identify the molecular mechanism underlying GATGGT repeats in non-coding regions of the TYMS gene which lead to hyperpigmentation. Non-coding repeat expansions can lead to disease through three major mechanisms: Epigenetic silencing resulting in loss-of-function of the expanded allele, sequestration of RNA-binding splicing factors and repeat-associated non-AUG translation (62). For example, Friedreich ataxia disorder exhibits GAA repeat expansion within the first intron of frataxin (FXN) gene (63), which leads to increases in DNA methylation in the upstream region of the FXN repeats, resulting in changes of chromatin structures. Benign adult familial myoclonic epilepsy type 1 (BAFME1) exhibits TTTTA repeats expansion with TTTCA repeats insertion in the intron 4 of sterile alpha motif domain containing 12 (SAMD12) (64,65). BAFME3, BAFME4, BAFME6, BAFME7 and BAFME8 also have the same pattern of repeat expansion in the intron of membrane associated ring-ch-type finger 6 (MARCH6) (66), yeats domain containing 2 (YEATS2) (67), trinucleotide repeat containing adaptor 6A (TNRC6A) (68), rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 2 (RAPGEF2) (68) and retinoic acid induced 1 (RAI1) (69). BFAME2 is caused by ATTTC repeats expansion within the first intron of StAR related lipid transfer domain containing 7(70). To the best of our knowledge, however, the exact mechanisms underlying BAFME have not yet been explained.

It was hypothesized that the intronic repeat expansions in the present twins decreased TYMS RNA levels and subsequently lowered TYMS protein levels, leading to genome instability. This, in turn, activates p53, similarly to DNA damage caused by UV exposure (71), increasing MITF expression and resulting in increased melanin synthesis and hyperpigmentation. RNA and protein levels in fibroblasts were assessed because of the possible role of fibroblasts in skin pigmentation. According to previous studies, fibroblasts produce paracrine factors that bind receptors on melanocytes, leading to melanogenesis (72,73). In addition, fibroblast-derived growth factors including hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), neuregulin 1 (NRG-1) and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) have been shown to increase pigment contents in melanocytes (74). However, RT-qPCR to quantify TYMS RNA levels and immunoblot analyses to determine TYMS protein levels showed no differences between the twins and controls. It is important to note that statistical analysis was not performed due to the limited sample size (n=2).

Based on the present results, it is hypothesized that the GATGGT repeats in non-coding regions of the TYMS gene may reduce TYMS expression specifically in melanocytes or keratinocytes as no decrease was observed in PBMCs or cultured skin fibroblasts. This decreased expression could lead to the disruption of nucleotide balance in DNA repair and skin hyperpigmentation. Future studies should investigate melanocytes and keratinocytes to verify the role of repeat expansion in TYMS associated with CPUM. The present study did not directly assess TYMS expression in melanocytes or keratinocytes, the primary cells responsible for pigmentation. Moreover, the present study was based on a single rare case of monozygotic twins with CPUM, and no additional cases were available for validation. Independent replication studies with additional cases are needed to confirm the pathogenic relevance of TYMS repeat expansion in CPUM. Despite these limitations, the present findings provide novel insights into a potential genetic mechanism underlying CPUM and offer a foundation for future functional studies.

In summary, the present study suggested a association link between intronic hexanucleotide repeat expansion in TYMS and CPUM. However, further studies are necessary to confirm this association and understand its pathogenesis.

Supplementary Material

Data S1
Mean expression of TYMS mRNA in PBMCs. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR was performed on PBMCs from control (n=3) and patient samples (n=2). PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell; TYMS, thymidylate synthase.
Original blots of thymidylate synthase detection.
Original blots of β-actin detection.
Compound heterozygous single nucleotide variant pairs identified.
Significantly enriched Gene Ontology biological processes associated with differentially methylated regions.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: The present study was supported by Health Systems Research Institute (grant no. 67-095) and Bioinformatics and Computation Biology Program, Chulalongkorn University.

Availability of data and materials

The data generated in the present study are not publicly available due to privacy constraints but may be requested from the corresponding author.

Authors' contributions

VS conceptualized and supervised the study. VS, ST, SP and MP designed the experiments and edited the manuscript. SC, TK, CV and PW collected clinical data and biological samples. CS performed the sequencing analysis. ST and KS performed RT-qPCR analysis and western blotting. SK and MP analyzed the data. SK and MP confirmed the authenticity of all the raw data. SK, SP, KS and MP drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University (approval nos. 264/62 and 813/63) and was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments, as well as all relevant ethical guidelines and regulations. The rights and interests of all participants were fully protected. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the patients.

Patient consent for publication

The authors confirm that the parents of the patients provided written informed consent for publication of potentially identifying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Use of artificial intelligence tools

ChatGPT (OpenAI) was used to refine the clarity and readability of English sentences in the manuscript. The AI-assisted revisions were limited to grammar, syntax and phrasing, without altering the scientific content, interpretation or originality of the work. All final edits were reviewed and approved by the authors.

References

1 

Bolognia J, Jorizzo JL and Schaffer JV: Disorders of hyperpigmentation. In: Dermatology. 3rd edition. Elsevier, London, pp1049-1074, 2012.

2 

Malviya N and Pandya A: Disorders of hyperpigmentation. In: Dermatoanthropology of Ethnic Skin and Hair. Vashi NA and Maibach HI (eds). Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp197-214, 2017.

3 

Ghosh A, Das A and Sarkar R: Diffuse hyperpigmentation: A comprehensive approach. Pigment Int. 5:4–13. 2018.

4 

Sandhu S, Neema S and Radhakrishnan S: Dermoscopy of disorders of hyperpigmentation. Pigment Int. 8:14–24. 2021.

5 

Alkhowailed MS, Otayf M, Albasseet A, Almousa A, Alajlan Z and Altalhab S: Clinical approach to linear hyperpigmentation: A review article. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 14:23–35. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Sinha S and Kulhari A: Reticulate pigmentary disorders: A review. Pigment Int. 6:67–76. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Grimes P, Nordlund JJ, Pandya AG, Taylor S, Rendon M and Ortonne JP: Increasing our understanding of pigmentary disorders. J Am Acad Dermatol. 54 (Suppl 2):S255–S261. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Thawabteh AM, Jibreen A, Karaman D, Thawabteh A and Karaman R: Skin pigmentation types, causes and treatment-a review. Molecules. 28(4839)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Ten S, New M and Maclaren N: Clinical review 130: Addison's disease 2001. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 86:2909–2922. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Betterle C and Morlin L: Autoimmune Addison's disease. Endocr Dev. 20:161–172. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Liu JW, Habulieti X, Wang RR, Ma DL and Zhang X: Two novel SASH1 mutations in Chinese families with dyschromatosis universalis hereditaria. J Clin Lab Anal. 35(e23803)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Murthy AB, Palaniappan V, Karthikeyan K and Anbarasan V: Dyschromatosis universalis hereditaria. Int J Dermatol. 62:1218–1227. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Orphanet: Prevalence and Incidence of Rare Diseases: Bibliographic Data. No. 1. Available from: http://www.orpha.net/orphacom/cahiers/docs/GB/Prevalence_of_rare_diseases_by_diseases.pdf. Accessed June 4, 2025.

14 

Khattab S, Nasser H, Al-Janabi MH and Hasan F: Dyskeratosis congenita: A rare case report. Oxf Med Case Reports. 2024(omae049)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Logsdon GA, Vollger MR and Eichler EE: Long-read human genome sequencing and its applications. Nat Rev Genet. 21:597–614. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Rhoads A and Au KF: PacBio Sequencing and its applications. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 13:278–289. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Adewale BA: Will long-read sequencing technologies replace short-read sequencing technologies in the next 10 years? Afr J Lab Med. 9(1340)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Hamada M, Ono Y, Asai K and Frith MC: Training alignment parameters for arbitrary sequencers with LAST-TRAIN. Bioinformatics. 33:926–928. 2016.

19 

Mitsuhashi S, Frith MC, Mizuguchi T, Miyatake S, Toyota T, Adachi H, Oma Y, Kino Y, Mitsuhashi H and Matsumoto N: Tandem-genotypes: Robust detection of tandem repeat expansions from long DNA reads. Genome Biol. 20(58)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Manichaikul A, Mychaleckyj JC, Rich SS, Daly K, Sale M and Chen WM: Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics. 26:2867–2873. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Kisiel MA and Klar AS: Isolation and culture of human dermal fibroblasts. Methods Mol Biol. 1993:71–78. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 (-Delta Delta C (T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Thorvaldsdóttir H, Robinson JT and Mesirov JP: Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): High-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform. 14:178–192. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Paller AS and Mancini AJ: Hurwitz Clinical Pediatric Dermatology. Fifth edition. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp245-278, 2016.

25 

Kaviarasan PK, Prasad PV, Joe JM, Nandana N and Viswanathan P: Universal acquired melanosis (Carbon baby). Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 74:38–40. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Convit J, Kerdel-Vegas F and Rodríguez G: Erythema dyschromicum perstans: A hitherto undescribed skin disease*. J Invest Dermatol. 36:457–462. 1961.

27 

Bhutani LK, Bedi TR, Pandhi RK and Nayak NC: Lichen planus pigmentosus. Dermatologica. 149:43–50. 1974.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Chernosky ME, Anderson DE, Chang JP, Shaw MW and Romsdahl MM: Familial progressive hyperpigmentation. Arch Dermatol. 103:581–591, passim. 1971.PubMed/NCBI

29 

Betz RC, Planko L, Eigelshoven S, Hanneken S, Pasternack SM, Büssow H, Van Den Bogaert K, Wenzel J, Braun-Falco M, Rütten A, et al: Loss-of-function mutations in the keratin 5 gene lead to dowling-degos diseasnue. Am J Hum Genet. 78:510–519. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Kono M, Sugiura K, Sugama M, Hayashi M, Takama H, Suzuki T, Matsunaga K, Tomita Y and Akiyama M: Whole-exome sequencing identifies ADAM10 mutations as a cause of reticulate acropigmentation of Kitamura, a clinical entity distinct from Dowling-Degos disease. Hum Mol Genet. 22:3524–3533. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Pezzani L, Brena M, Callea M, Colombi M and Tadini G: X-linked reticulate pigmentary disorder with systemic manifestations: A new family and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet A. 161A:1414–1420. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Cao L, Zhang R, Yong L, Chen S, Zhang H, Chen W, Xu Q, Ge H, Mao Y, Zhen Q, et al: Novel missense mutation of SASH1 in a Chinese family with dyschromatosis universalis hereditaria. BMC Med Genomics. 14(168)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Takeichi T, Hsu CK, Yang HS, Chen HY, Wong TW, Tsai WL, Chao SC, Lee JY, Akiyama M, Simpson MA and McGrath JA: Progressive hyperpigmentation in a Taiwanese child due to an inborn error of vitamin B12 metabolism (cblJ). Br J Dermatol. 172:1111–1115. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Baxter LL and Pavan WJ: The etiology and molecular genetics of human pigmentation disorders. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2:379–392. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Chakrabarti N and Chattopadhyay C: Ashy dermatosis: A controversial entity. Indian J Dermatol. 57:61–62. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Furuya T and Mishima Y: Progressive pigmentary disorder in Japanese child. Arch Dermatol. 86:412–418. 1962.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Ghosh SK, Ghoshal L, Bhunia D and Ghoshal AM: Acquired universal melanosis (carbon baby syndrome). Pediatr Dermatol. 31:620–622. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Kint A, Oomen C, Geerts ML and Breuillard F: Congenital diffuse melanosis. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 114:11–16. 1987.PubMed/NCBI(In French).

39 

Mahajan BB, Budhwar J, Chojer P and Singla C: Carbon baby syndrome: A rare case report. JDA Indian J Clin Dermatol. 1:61–63. 2018.

40 

Malik P, Pathania M and Rathaur VK: A case of a 4-year-old carbon baby: Acquired universal melanosis and literature review. Int J Inn Res Med Sci. 5:92–94. 2020.

41 

Mammen A, Deepthi B, Majhi C, Kumar M and Kumar S: Carbon baby syndrome-A rare case. Kerala Med J. 9:138–140. 2015.

42 

Naskar S, Kharkar V, Hershada M and Maharshtra M: Carbon baby-A unique manifestation of cryptic mastocytosis. Am J Dermatol Res Rev. 37(3)2020.

43 

Niiyama S, Bando Y, Ishii M and Katsuoka K: Universal acquired melanosis: Carbon baby. Dermatol Online J. 19(18961)2013.PubMed/NCBI

44 

Parviz T, Sarah E and Ehsan A: Acquired universal melanosis (Carbon baby syndrome) in a 4-year old girl. Iran J Dermatol. 16:162–164. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

45 

Ruiz-Maldonado R, Tamayo L and Fernández-Diez J: Universal Acquired Melanosis: The Carbon Baby. Arch Dermatol. 114:775–778. 1978.PubMed/NCBI

46 

Shome K, Seth J, Samanta AB, Halder S, Das I and Sarkar P: Carbon baby syndrome: Two case reports. J Pak Assoc Dermatol. 22:59–62. 2012.

47 

Wanlapakorn N, Nilyanimit P, Vorawandthanachai T, Deesudjit T, Dumrongpisutikul N and Poovorawan Y: A novel stop codon mutation in exon 1 (558C>A) of the UGT1A1 gene in a Thai neonate with Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I. Genet Mol Res. 14:419–425. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

48 

Song Y, Zhao D, Xu X, Lv F, Li L, Jiang Y, Wang O, Xia W, Xing X and Li M: Novel compound heterozygous mutations in SERPINH1 cause rare autosomal recessive osteogenesis imperfecta type X. Osteoporos Int. 29:1389–1396. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

49 

Huang K, Luo YB, Bi FF and Yang H: Pharmacological strategy for congenital myasthenic syndrome with CHRNE mutations: A meta-analysis of case reports. Curr Neuropharmacol. 19:718–729. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

50 

Alizadeh R, Jamshidi S, Keramatipour M, Moeinian P, Hosseini R, Otukesh H and Talebi S: Whole exome sequencing reveals a XPNPEP3 novel mutation causing nephronophthisis in a pediatric patient. Iran Biomed J. 24:405–408. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

51 

Lu J, Chen P, Chen T, Li L, Fu X, Yang T and Wu H: The p.R206C mutation in MYO7A leads to autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 82:181–187. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

52 

Schiaffino S, Hughes SM, Murgia M and Reggiani C: MYH13, a superfast myosin expressed in extraocular, laryngeal and syringeal muscles. J Physiol. 602:427–443. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

53 

Brychtova V, Coates PJ, Hrabal V, Boldrup L, Fabian P, Vojtesek B, Sgaramella N and Nylander K: Keratin 36, a specific marker of tongue filiform papillae, is downregulated in squamous cell carcinoma of the mobile tongue. Mol Clin Oncol. 12:421–428. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

54 

Cao L and Lin F: TECPR1 induces apoptosis in non-small cell lung carcinoma via ATG5 upregulation-induced autophagy promotion. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 52:580–592. 2022.PubMed/NCBI

55 

Ozer U, Barbour KW, Clinton SA and Berger FG: Oxidative stress and response to thymidylate synthase-targeted antimetabolites. Mol Pharmacol. 88:970–981. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

56 

Cui R, Widlund HR, Feige E, Lin JY, Wilensky DL, Igras VE, D'Orazio J, Fung CY, Schanbacher CF, Granter SR and Fisher DE: Central role of p53 in the suntan response and pathologic hyperpigmentation. Cell. 128:853–864. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

57 

Niu C and Aisa HA: Upregulation of melanogenesis and tyrosinase activity: Potential agents for vitiligo. Molecules. 22(1303)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

58 

Speeckaert R, Van Gele M, Speeckaert MM, Lambert J and van Geel N: The biology of hyperpigmentation syndromes. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 27:512–524. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

59 

Liberzon A, Birger C, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Ghandi M, Mesirov JP and Tamayo P: The Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst. 1:417–425. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

60 

Tummala H, Walne A, Buccafusca R, Alnajar J, Szabo A, Robinson P, McConkie-Rosell A, Wilson M, Crowley S, Kinsler V, et al: Germline thymidylate synthase deficiency impacts nucleotide metabolism and causes dyskeratosis congenita. Am J Hum Genet. 109:1472–1483. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

61 

Leoyklang P, Siriwan P and Shotelersuk V: A mutation of the p63 gene in non-syndromic cleft lip. J Med Genet. 43(e28)2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

62 

Depienne C and Mandel JL: 30 years of repeat expansion disorders: What have we learned and what are the remaining challenges? Am J Hum Genet. 108:764–785. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

63 

Greene E, Mahishi L, Entezam A, Kumari D and Usdin K: Repeat-induced epigenetic changes in intron 1 of the frataxin gene and its consequences in Friedreich ataxia. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:3383–3390. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

64 

Cen Z, Jiang Z, Chen Y, Zheng X, Xie F, Yang X, Lu X, Ouyang Z, Wu H, Chen S, et al: Intronic pentanucleotide TTTCA repeat insertion in the SAMD12 gene causes familial cortical myoclonic tremor with epilepsy type 1. Brain. 141:2280–2288. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

65 

Yeetong P, Chunharas C, Pongpanich M, Bennett MF, Srichomthong C, Pasutharnchat N, Suphapeetiporn K, Bahlo M and Shotelersuk V: Founder effect of the TTTCA repeat insertions in SAMD12 causing BAFME1. Eur J Hum Genet. 29:343–348. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

66 

Florian RT, Kraft F, Leitão E, Kaya S, Klebe S, Magnin E, van Rootselaar AF, Buratti J, Kühnel T, Schröder C, et al: Unstable TTTTA/TTTCA expansions in MARCH6 are associated with Familial Adult Myoclonic Epilepsy type 3. Nat Commun. 10(4919)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

67 

Yeetong P, Pongpanich M, Srichomthong C, Assawapitaksakul A and Shotelersuk V, Tantirukdham N, Chunharas C, Suphapeetiporn K and Shotelersuk V: TTTCA repeat insertions in an intron of YEATS2 in benign adult familial myoclonic epilepsy type 4. Brain. 142:3360–3366. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

68 

Ishiura H, Doi K, Mitsui J, Yoshimura J, Matsukawa MK, Fujiyama A, Toyoshima Y, Kakita A, Takahashi H, Suzuki Y, et al: Expansions of intronic TTTCA and TTTTA repeats in benign adult familial myoclonic epilepsy. Nat Genet. 50:581–590. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

69 

Yeetong P, Dembélé ME, Pongpanich M, Cissé L, Srichomthong C, Maiga AB, Dembélé K, Assawapitaksakul A, Bamba S, Yalcouyé A, et al: Pentanucleotide repeat insertions in RAI1 cause benign adult familial myoclonic epilepsy type 8. Mov Disord. 39:164–172. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

70 

Corbett MA, Kroes T, Veneziano L, Bennett MF, Florian R, Schneider AL, Coppola A, Licchetta L, Franceschetti S, Suppa A, et al: Intronic ATTTC repeat expansions in STARD7 in familial adult myoclonic epilepsy linked to chromosome 2. Nat Commun. 10(4920)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

71 

Hida T, Kamiya T, Kawakami A, Ogino J, Sohma H, Uhara H and Jimbow K: Elucidation of melanogenesis cascade for identifying pathophysiology and therapeutic approach of pigmentary disorders and melanoma. Int J Mol Sci. 21(6129)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

72 

Duval C, Cohen C, Chagnoleau C, Flouret V, Bourreau E and Bernerd F: Key regulatory role of dermal fibroblasts in pigmentation as demonstrated using a reconstructed skin model: Impact of photo-aging. PLoS One. 9(e114182)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

73 

Wang Y, Viennet C, Robin S, Berthon JY, He L and Humbert P: Precise role of dermal fibroblasts on melanocyte pigmentation. J Dermatol Sci. 88:159–166. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

74 

Li PH, Liu LH, Chang CC, Gao R, Leung CH, Ma DL and David Wang HM: Silencing stem cell factor gene in fibroblasts to regulate paracrine factor productions and enhance c-Kit expression in melanocytes on melanogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 19(1475)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August-2025
Volume 23 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 2049-9434
Online ISSN:2049-9442

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Kanchanasutthiyakorn S, Chaiyamahapurk S, Tongkobpetch S, Santawong K, Srichomthong C, Klomchan T, Virochsangaroon C, Pongpanich M, Warnnissorn P, Pongcharoen S, Pongcharoen S, et al: Intronic hexanucleotide repeat expansion in <em>TYMS</em> in monozygotic twins with congenital progressive universal melanosis. Biomed Rep 23: 138, 2025.
APA
Kanchanasutthiyakorn, S., Chaiyamahapurk, S., Tongkobpetch, S., Santawong, K., Srichomthong, C., Klomchan, T. ... Shotelersuk, V. (2025). Intronic hexanucleotide repeat expansion in <em>TYMS</em> in monozygotic twins with congenital progressive universal melanosis. Biomedical Reports, 23, 138. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2025.2016
MLA
Kanchanasutthiyakorn, S., Chaiyamahapurk, S., Tongkobpetch, S., Santawong, K., Srichomthong, C., Klomchan, T., Virochsangaroon, C., Pongpanich, M., Warnnissorn, P., Pongcharoen, S., Shotelersuk, V."Intronic hexanucleotide repeat expansion in <em>TYMS</em> in monozygotic twins with congenital progressive universal melanosis". Biomedical Reports 23.2 (2025): 138.
Chicago
Kanchanasutthiyakorn, S., Chaiyamahapurk, S., Tongkobpetch, S., Santawong, K., Srichomthong, C., Klomchan, T., Virochsangaroon, C., Pongpanich, M., Warnnissorn, P., Pongcharoen, S., Shotelersuk, V."Intronic hexanucleotide repeat expansion in <em>TYMS</em> in monozygotic twins with congenital progressive universal melanosis". Biomedical Reports 23, no. 2 (2025): 138. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2025.2016