Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Oncology Letters
      • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • Information for Authors
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Information for Librarians
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Reviewers
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Login Register Submit
  • This site uses cookies
  • You can change your cookie settings at any time by following the instructions in our Cookie Policy. To find out more, you may read our Privacy Policy.

    I agree
Search articles by DOI, keyword, author or affiliation
Search
Advanced Search
presentation
Biomedical Reports
Join Editorial Board Propose a Special Issue
Print ISSN: 2049-9434 Online ISSN: 2049-9442
Journal Cover
July-2026 Volume 25 Issue 1

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

Journals

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.

Molecular Medicine Reports

Molecular Medicine Reports

Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.

Biomedical Reports

Biomedical Reports

Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.

World Academy of Sciences Journal

World Academy of Sciences Journal

Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.

International Journal of Epigenetics

International Journal of Epigenetics

Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.

Medicine International

Medicine International

An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.

Journal Cover
July-2026 Volume 25 Issue 1

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

  • Article
  • Citations
    • Cite This Article
    • Download Citation
    • Create Citation Alert
    • Remove Citation Alert
    • Cited By
  • Similar Articles
    • Related Articles (in Spandidos Publications)
    • Similar Articles (Google Scholar)
    • Similar Articles (PubMed)
  • Download PDF
  • Download XML
  • View XML

  • Supplementary Files
    • Supplementary_Data1.pdf
    • Supplementary_Data2.pdf
Article Open Access

Establishing a competence model in discriminating Mycobacterium species and Mycobacterium abscessus subspecies by using surface‑enhanced Raman spectroscopy

  • Authors:
    • Apisith Pichitphorn
    • Kiatichai Faksri
    • Benjawan Kaewseekhao
    • Chotima Potisap
    • Tran Duong Thai
    • Jukgarin Eisiri
    • Chadatan Juntagran
    • Wises Namwat
    • Priyakorn Khwansirikul
    • Kanin Salao
    • Suwit Chaisri
    • Wisitsak Phoksawat
  • View Affiliations / Copyright

    Affiliations: Research and Diagnostic Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand, Department of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore, Chulabhorn International College of Medicine (CICM), Thammasat University, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand
    Copyright: © Pichitphorn et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
  • Article Number: 81
    |
    Published online on: May 5, 2026
       https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2026.2154
  • Expand metrics +
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

This article is mentioned in:


Abstract

Surface‑enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) is a powerful laser‑based technique with high sensitivity and rapid detection. The present study aimed to establish a model for distinguishing Mycobacterium abscessus (nontuberculous mycobacteria; NTM) from M. tuberculosis H37Ra (MTB‑H37Ra; a nonvirulent strain) based on genomic DNA detection, as well as distinguishing M. abscessus subspecies abscessus (MAB) from M. abscessus subspecies massiliense (MMAS). OnSpec‑Prime SERS chips and a portable Raman spectrometer device were used. Machine learning approaches, including linear discriminant analysis (LDA), random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGB), and logistic regression (LR), as well as the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) were analyzed. A competence model to distinguish NTM from MTB‑H37Ra was established; MAB and MMAS were potentially differentiated. At 15 and 50 ng/µl of genomic DNA, respectively, LR demonstrated 99.74 and 99.73% accuracy in differentiating NTM from MTB‑H37Ra; XGB displayed 96.25 and 92.97% accuracy in differentiating between MAB and MMAS. LDA revealed clear clustering in each group. The ROC curves showed strong performance of the XGB model across various DNA concentrations. All models achieved an excellent to perfect AUC of 0.96 to 1.00. The present study established a competence model using SERS which may represent a rapid and high‑accuracy detection approach, especially in M. abscessus subspecies‑level discrimination in clinical specimens.

Introduction

Rapid infectious disease identification is critical in clinical decision making, enhancing epidemiological surveillance and outbreak control and reducing healthcare costs. The vibrational spectroscopic method, a recent technique which facilitates the identification of pathogens by their unique whole organism fingerprint, meets the requirements for speed and accuracy (1). Raman spectrometry (RS) is gaining popularity in numerous fields, particularly medical and clinical research (2). RS identifies pathogens through the inelastic scattering of photons from biological molecules following a primary radiation strike (3). A powerful technique, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) can enhance the ability to identify biological molecules up to 1015 times that of traditional RS. SERS can detect very low concentrations of biological molecules such as proteins, DNA and metabolites) using minimal sample volumes (~1-2 µl) within 10 min; sample processing and analysis can be completed within 3 h. Therefore, SERS offers rapid detection, single-molecule detection with clearer signals, lower fluorescence backgrounds, and greater accuracy in complex matrices than traditional RS (4,5). It is also simpler, more time efficient, cost-effective and sensitive than other techniques (2), holding significant potential for development as a powerful tool for point-of-care testing (POCT).

Mycobacterium species include M. tuberculosis, M. leprae and nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), causative agents of various human diseases. NTM are responsible for pulmonary, cutaneous, and lymphatic infections as well as systemic disseminated disease, markedly affecting global morbidity and mortality rates (6,7). Globally, the incidence and prevalence of NTM diseases are on the rise (8,9). M. abcsessus is a significant, rapidly growing species comprising three primary subspecies: M. abscessus subsp. abscessus (MAB), M. abscessus subsp. massiliense (MMAS), and M. abscessus subsp. bolletii (10).

Multiple techniques have been developed for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium infections, including microbiological culture, biochemical assays and the polymerase chain reaction, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), and DNA sequencing (11-15). MALDI-TOF MS is a modern, reliable, accurate, high-throughput technique used to identify proteins via peptide mass fingerprinting and is gaining popularity for use in bacterial species-level identification (16,17). However, it remains limited in the discrimination of closely related M. abscessus subspecies. Thus, identifying these NTM at the subspecies level requires the implementation of novel approaches for simple, rapid and highly accurate discrimination (18).

The present study aimed to establish a SERS competence model for distinguishing Mycobacterium species and M. abscessus subspecies by detecting genomic DNA and using machine learning (ML) algorithms. SERS holds potential as a simple, rapid, accurate, and cost-effective method in routine microbiology testing based on genomic DNA analysis.

Materials and methods

Study design and workflow

The present study comprised two phases: Bacterial cultivation and data acquisition (Phase I) and data processing and computational analyses (Phase II; Fig. 1). In Phase I, collected samples of all bacteria maintained in the biobank stock were re-cultured. Previously, isolated M. abscessus was identified by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) (19). In the present study, the bacterial DNA were extracted, dropped on SERS substrates and air-dried. The DNA signals were measured using a portable Raman spectrometer (National Electronics and Computer Technology Center). In Phase II, the data were processed using the Python programming languages with the leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) function to distinguish the NTM subspecies (MAB and MMAS) and MTB-H37Ra. The Raman mapping approach (20) was used to increase sensitivity. In the SERS spectra validation, spectra were evaluated based on the peak assignments. The ML approaches, including principal component analysis (PCA), uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), and logistic regression (LR), were analyzed. The performance of the constructed classification models was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) to quantify discriminative ability.

Study workflow (experimental design
and analysis). The design of the present study comprised two
phases. Phase I (blue background; left hand): Bacterial cultivation
and data acquisition; collected bacterial samples maintained in the
biobank stock were re-cultured. Bacterial DNA were then extracted,
dropped on SERS substrates, and air-dried. DNA signals were
measured using a portable Raman spectrometer. Phase II (peach-pink
background; right hand): Data processing and computational
analyses; data were processed using the Python programming
languages using the LOOCV function to distinguish the NTM
subspecies (MAB and MMAS) and MTB-H37Ra. For validation, SERS
spectra were evaluated based on the peak assignments. The ML
approaches (PCA, UMAP, LDA, RF, XGB, and LR) were analyzed.
Performance of the constructed classification models was evaluated
using ROC curves and the AUC to quantify discriminative ability.
LOOCV, leave-one-out cross-validation; NTM, nontuberculous
mycobacteria; MAB, M. abscessus subspecies abscessus;
MMAS, M. abscessus subspecies massiliense; MTB-H37Ra,
M. tuberculosis H37Ra; SERS, surface-enhanced Raman
spectroscopy; ML, machine learning; PCA, principal component
analysis; UMAP, uniform manifold approximation and projection; LDA,
linear discriminant analysis; RF, random forest; XGB, extreme
gradient boosting; LR, logistic regression; ROC, receiver operating
characteristic; AUC, area under the curve.

Figure 1

Study workflow (experimental design and analysis). The design of the present study comprised two phases. Phase I (blue background; left hand): Bacterial cultivation and data acquisition; collected bacterial samples maintained in the biobank stock were re-cultured. Bacterial DNA were then extracted, dropped on SERS substrates, and air-dried. DNA signals were measured using a portable Raman spectrometer. Phase II (peach-pink background; right hand): Data processing and computational analyses; data were processed using the Python programming languages using the LOOCV function to distinguish the NTM subspecies (MAB and MMAS) and MTB-H37Ra. For validation, SERS spectra were evaluated based on the peak assignments. The ML approaches (PCA, UMAP, LDA, RF, XGB, and LR) were analyzed. Performance of the constructed classification models was evaluated using ROC curves and the AUC to quantify discriminative ability. LOOCV, leave-one-out cross-validation; NTM, nontuberculous mycobacteria; MAB, M. abscessus subspecies abscessus; MMAS, M. abscessus subspecies massiliense; MTB-H37Ra, M. tuberculosis H37Ra; SERS, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy; ML, machine learning; PCA, principal component analysis; UMAP, uniform manifold approximation and projection; LDA, linear discriminant analysis; RF, random forest; XGB, extreme gradient boosting; LR, logistic regression; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; AUC, area under the curve.

Bacterial isolation and cultivation

The bacteria used in the present study included NTM (M. abscessus subspecies: MAB and MMAS) and MTB-H37Ra (ATCC 25177; nonvirulent strain). The NTM were isolated from patients between 2012 and 2017 and retrieved from archived stock cultures at the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory Unit, Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University Khon Kaen, Thailand. MTB-H37Ra was kindly given by Professor Prasit Palittapongarnpim, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Thailand (21). In the present study, the bacteria were re-subcultured on sheep blood agar (Quality Media and Supply Co. Ltd.) at 37˚C for 5 days. Middlebrook 7H9 broth liquid medium (Becton, Dickinson and Company) was used for MTB-H37Ra recultivation. The present study was approved and all protocols regulated by the Khon Kaen University Ethics Committee for Human Research (approval no. HE 591454).

In our previous study, genomic DNA samples were sequenced using the Illumina high-throughput platform at NovogeneAIT Genomics (Novogene Co., Ltd.). Based on this WGS analysis, NTM were divided into MAB and MMAS, corresponding to subspecies of M. abscessus identified by rpoB gene sequences (13). The accession numbers were shown as Table SI (19,22), however, one isolate of MMAS was identified by MALDI-TOF.

Genomic DNA extraction

Bacterial genomic DNA was extracted from three full loops of pure colonies cultured on blood agar (Clinag Co. Ltd.). The bacterial pellet was washed twice with 1 ml Tris-EDTA buffer, then centrifuged at 13,416 x g and room temperature for 10 min. All genomic DNA was extracted using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method (19,23). Bacterial cell lysis began with incubation in 10 mg/ml lysozyme, followed by the sequential addition of 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 10 mg/ml proteinase K and CTAB solutions to disrupt the cell membranes. Cold absolute ethanol and 5 M sodium chloride were added to precipitate the DNA. Genomic DNA samples were resuspended in sterile nuclease-free water (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and measured using Nanodrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). A range of DNA concentrations (5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 50 ng/µl) was prepared and stored at -20˚C until SERS analysis.

Raman spectroscopy acquisition

The SERS measurements were acquired using a portable RS device, with 2 µl of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 50 ng/µl DNA samples individually dropped onto the center of a silver-based SERS sensor and left to air dry for 10 min. The Raman spectrum was collected from the central region of the drop. Spectral acquisition was performed using a wavelength of 785 nm with an exposure time of 20 sec. Spectral data were collected from 25 points arranged in a 5x5 mapping grid with 0.1 mm spacing. Each sample was measured in triplicate. The optimal protocol in a previous study was used in this experiment (24). The Raman spectrum fingerprint region (600-1,800 cm-¹) represents the biological components of bacterial cells, including proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids (25). The key peak locations, primarily attributed to nucleic acid components, are summarized in Table SII. The observed Raman peaks correspond with those reported in previous studies (26-37).

Raman spectral data processing

The Raman spectra from triplicate mapping (75 data points) of each isolate were collected. A total of 825 datasets were initially preprocessed by removing cosmic rays and outliers, followed by signal averaging for each Raman-mapped dataset. The analysis was performed by supervised ML using the Python programming language based on the LOOCV approach. The data included three classes (MAB, MMAS and MTB-H37Ra). The ML models were trained on PCA, UMAP, LDA, RF, XGB and LR algorithms from the Scikit-learn library (38). In this procedure, one Raman-mapped data point from each isolate was used as the test set; the remaining 824 data points from other isolated samples constituted the training set. These processes were repeated until all datasets were tested, and the average accuracy was recorded.

The performance of the classification models (LDA, RF, XGB and LR) was evaluated using ROC analysis. The AUC was used to quantify discriminative ability, calculated for each model to assess the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (1-false positive rate) across various classification thresholds. The ROC curves and AUC values were used to compare the overall classification efficacy of the ML approaches.

Statistical analysis

Multiple comparisons for non-parametric independent samples were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Adjusted P-values using Dunn-Bonferroni post-hoc analysis were later used to identify pairwise differences between groups. Pearson's and Spearman's correlation analyses were performed to assess the reproducibility of SERS spectra. The coefficient values converging toward 1.00 indicate high reproducibility and excellent consistency. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were recorded using a confusion matrix in the Python programming language. The formulas are as follows: sensitivity=true positive/(true positive + false negative); specificity=true negative/(true negative + false positive); accuracy=average of sensitivity and specificity. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Minimal concentration of bacterial genomic DNA for SERS detection

The minimal detectable concentration for genomic DNA was determined using SERS. For bacterial genomic DNA samples, Raman maps were acquired in triplicate. Within each map, 25 individual Raman spectra were collected, resulting in a total of 75 spectra (25 spectra/map x3 maps) per sample. Raman mapping can obtain all signals from each specified point. To ensure signal responsiveness and usability prior to sample analysis, each SERS substrate was thoroughly tested; it was confirmed that the SERS chip exhibited specific background peaks at 1,003 and 1,600 cm-¹ (Fig. 2A). M. abscessus genomic DNA was then dropped at a concentration of 50 ng/µl onto the SERS chip. Prominent peaks were observed in the 600-1,800 cm-¹ range at 726, 755, 783, 927, 983, 1,053, 1,098, 1,165, 1,187, 1,250, 1,330, 1,486 and 1,578 cm-¹. Genomic DNA samples at concentrations of 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 ng/µl were also tested. Clear peak visibility was maintained at 15-50 ng/µl (Fig. 2B). At lower concentrations, some peaks disappeared and interference from other peaks were more noticeable. Therefore, 15 ng/µl may be considered the minimum detectable concentration with clear DNA features, with 50 ng/µl demonstrating the most reliable spectral analysis.

Raman spectrum patterns obtained from
SERS analysis. (A) Raman fingerprinting of each SERS chip, analyzed
at 785 nm. Pre-analysis was conducted before the chips were used to
investigate sample specimens. (B) Raman fingerprinting of
Mycobacterium abscessus at specific concentrations (15 and
50 ng/µl) quantified via Nanodrop. Prominent peak positions are
indicated above each peak, allowing for a clear comparison related
to DNA content. Raman spectra are displayed as plots of Raman
intensity vs. Raman shift (cm-¹). SERS, surface-enhanced
Raman spectroscopy; a.u., arbitrary unit.

Figure 2

Raman spectrum patterns obtained from SERS analysis. (A) Raman fingerprinting of each SERS chip, analyzed at 785 nm. Pre-analysis was conducted before the chips were used to investigate sample specimens. (B) Raman fingerprinting of Mycobacterium abscessus at specific concentrations (15 and 50 ng/µl) quantified via Nanodrop. Prominent peak positions are indicated above each peak, allowing for a clear comparison related to DNA content. Raman spectra are displayed as plots of Raman intensity vs. Raman shift (cm-¹). SERS, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy; a.u., arbitrary unit.

Raman spectra of genomic DNA

Raman spectra of genomic DNA at 15 and 50 ng/µl were obtained using SERS at 785 nm (Fig. 3). The characteristic bands of the two M. abscessus subspecies (MAB and MMAS) and MTB-H37Ra were analyzed. Peaks 726, 755, 781 and 1,317 cm-¹, corresponding to nucleic acids, were the most intense in MAB and MMAS; MTB-H37Ra exhibited the strongest peaks at 755, 781, and 1,317 cm-¹. The 1,000-1,250 cm-¹ region corresponds to the asymmetric stretching mode of the phosphate deoxy group, with the peak at 1,097 cm-¹ the most prominent for Mycobacterium. The 1,331 cm-¹ band corresponds to vibrations of bases coupled with sugar vibrations, specifically adenine and guanine bases. Vibrational bands in the 1,450-1,800 cm-¹ range, corresponding to double bond stretching of residual bases, were observed at 1,486 and 1,577 cm-¹ in MAB and MMAS; MTB-H37Ra showed a weaker band at 1,486 cm-¹.

SERS spectrum results for three
bacteria: MAB, MMAS and MTB-H37Ra. (A) Raman spectra from DNA at 15
ng/µl. (B) Raman spectra from DNA at 50 ng/µl. The solid lines
indicate the mean spectra; the shaded regions represent the
standard deviation. Numbers above the peaks correspond to the
strong peak positions, with dotted lines marking the precise
location of each peak. All Raman spectra are plotted as Raman
intensity vs. Raman shift (cm-¹). SERS, surface-enhanced
Raman spectroscopy; MAB, M. abscessus subspecies
abscessus; MMAS, M. abscessus subspecies
massiliense; MTB-H37Ra, M. tuberculosis H37Ra; a.u.,
arbitrary unit.

Figure 3

SERS spectrum results for three bacteria: MAB, MMAS and MTB-H37Ra. (A) Raman spectra from DNA at 15 ng/µl. (B) Raman spectra from DNA at 50 ng/µl. The solid lines indicate the mean spectra; the shaded regions represent the standard deviation. Numbers above the peaks correspond to the strong peak positions, with dotted lines marking the precise location of each peak. All Raman spectra are plotted as Raman intensity vs. Raman shift (cm-¹). SERS, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy; MAB, M. abscessus subspecies abscessus; MMAS, M. abscessus subspecies massiliense; MTB-H37Ra, M. tuberculosis H37Ra; a.u., arbitrary unit.

SERS spectral analysis compared with Mycobacterium species and subspecies

Raman spectra exhibiting a relative standard deviation <50% were selected as reliable peak markers (Table SII). Notably, all three bacteria exhibited abundant peak assignments primarily related to genomic DNA. SERS performance was subsequently evaluated using eight candidate peak markers at 15 and 50 ng/µl DNA concentrations (Figs. 4 and 5). These peak markers revealed significant spectral differences, indicating variations in biomolecule content and abundance across species (NTM: MAB/MMAS vs. MTB-H37Ra) and even subspecies (MAB and MMAS). These distinct biomolecular profiles allow for the identification of bacterial features using useful factors. The eight candidate peaks were selected and evaluated by the significance of their P-values, highlighting their discriminatory power.

Box plot comparisons of peak
intensities for eight candidate peaks for bacterial DNA content at
15 ng/µl. The specific Raman intensities examined were at 726, 755,
781, 1,097, 1,317, 1,331, 1,486 and 1,577 cm-¹. The
y-axis represents the relative intensity of the peaks; the x-axis
indicates the bacterial DNA species. Multiple comparisons were
analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test prior to examining pairwise
differences between groups by using Dunn-Bonferroni post-hoc
analysis. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, and
****P<0.0001; n.s., non-significant. H37Ra, M.
tuberculosis H37Ra; MMAS, M. abscessus subspecies
massiliense; MAB, M. abscessus subspecies
abscessus; a.u., arbitrary unit.

Figure 4

Box plot comparisons of peak intensities for eight candidate peaks for bacterial DNA content at 15 ng/µl. The specific Raman intensities examined were at 726, 755, 781, 1,097, 1,317, 1,331, 1,486 and 1,577 cm-¹. The y-axis represents the relative intensity of the peaks; the x-axis indicates the bacterial DNA species. Multiple comparisons were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test prior to examining pairwise differences between groups by using Dunn-Bonferroni post-hoc analysis. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, and ****P<0.0001; n.s., non-significant. H37Ra, M. tuberculosis H37Ra; MMAS, M. abscessus subspecies massiliense; MAB, M. abscessus subspecies abscessus; a.u., arbitrary unit.

Box plot comparisons of peak
intensities for eight candidate peaks for bacterial DNA content at
50 ng/µl. The specific Raman intensities examined were at 726, 755,
781, 1,097, 1,317, 1,331, 1,486, and 1,577 cm-¹. The
y-axis represents the relative intensity of the peaks; the x-axis
indicates the bacterial DNA species. Multiple comparisons were
analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test prior to examining pairwise
differences between groups by using Dunn-Bonferroni post-hoc
analysis. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 and
****P<0.0001; n.s., non-significant. H37Ra, M.
tuberculosis H37Ra; MMAS, M. abscessus subspecies
massiliense; MAB, M. abscessus subspecies
abscessus; a.u., arbitrary unit.

Figure 5

Box plot comparisons of peak intensities for eight candidate peaks for bacterial DNA content at 50 ng/µl. The specific Raman intensities examined were at 726, 755, 781, 1,097, 1,317, 1,331, 1,486, and 1,577 cm-¹. The y-axis represents the relative intensity of the peaks; the x-axis indicates the bacterial DNA species. Multiple comparisons were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test prior to examining pairwise differences between groups by using Dunn-Bonferroni post-hoc analysis. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 and ****P<0.0001; n.s., non-significant. H37Ra, M. tuberculosis H37Ra; MMAS, M. abscessus subspecies massiliense; MAB, M. abscessus subspecies abscessus; a.u., arbitrary unit.

Discriminating Mycobacterium subspecies using ML approaches

SERS spectral data were analyzed using PCA (Fig. 6A), UMAP (Fig. 6B), and LDA (Fig. 6C). UMAP and PCA could not clearly distinguish the bacterial groups. However, LDA effectively separated the three bacteria into distinct clusters, demonstrating that SERS spectral data contain sufficient information for reliable differentiation when combined with appropriate dimensionality reduction techniques.

Plot analysis of PCA, UMAP and LDA.
Plots compare three bacteria at genomic DNA concentrations of 15
(left hand) and 50 ng/µl (right hand). (A) PCA, (B) UMAP, and (C)
LDA were analysed and represented in dot plot. Blue dots represent
MAB, green dots indicate MMAS, and red dots represent MTB-H37Ra.
PCA, principal component analysis; UMAP, uniform manifold
approximation and projection; LDA, linear discriminant analysis;
MAB, M. abscessus subspecies abscessus; MMAS, M.
abscessus subspecies massiliense; MTB-H37Ra, M.
tuberculosis H37Ra.

Figure 6

Plot analysis of PCA, UMAP and LDA. Plots compare three bacteria at genomic DNA concentrations of 15 (left hand) and 50 ng/µl (right hand). (A) PCA, (B) UMAP, and (C) LDA were analysed and represented in dot plot. Blue dots represent MAB, green dots indicate MMAS, and red dots represent MTB-H37Ra. PCA, principal component analysis; UMAP, uniform manifold approximation and projection; LDA, linear discriminant analysis; MAB, M. abscessus subspecies abscessus; MMAS, M. abscessus subspecies massiliense; MTB-H37Ra, M. tuberculosis H37Ra.

To further explore the utility of this approach, ML was employed for classification. This involved the LOOCV strategy, with four models evaluated: LDA, XGB, RF, and LR (Table I). The XGB model demonstrated the highest performance in NTM subgroup classification (MAB vs. MMAS), achieving accuracies of 96.25 and 92.97% (F1-scores 96.32 and 92.94%) at 15 and 50 ng/µl DNA, respectively. The LR model proved most effective at distinguishing between the NTM and MTB-H37Ra groups, delivering near-perfect discrimination with accuracies of 99.74 and 99.73% (F1-scores 99.86 and 99.85%) at both concentrations. ROC curves were generated to evaluate the performance of each model and determine sensitivity and specificity, and the best AUC values of each model were calculated (Fig. 7). Notably, the sum of the sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (1-false positive rate), as represented by the calculated AUC values, was consistently close to 1, highlighting the effectiveness of the models at distinguishing the different bacterial classes. The ROC curves confirmed these findings, with the XGB model showing strong performance in the NTM group (MAB and MMAS; Fig. 7A) and the LR model achieving a perfect AUC of 1 for distinguishing the NTM from the MTB-H37Ra group (Fig. 7B).

The LDA, XGB, RF and LR analyses of
the ROC curve. (A) MAB vs MMAS. (B) NTM group vs. MTB-H37Ra. LDA,
linear discriminant analysis; XGB, extreme gradient boosting; RF,
random forest; LR, logistic regression; ROC, receiver operating
characteristic; MAB, M. abscessus subspecies
abscessus; MMAS, M. abscessus subspecies
massiliense; NTM, nontuberculous mycobacteria; MTB-H37Ra,
M. tuberculosis H37Ra.

Figure 7

The LDA, XGB, RF and LR analyses of the ROC curve. (A) MAB vs MMAS. (B) NTM group vs. MTB-H37Ra. LDA, linear discriminant analysis; XGB, extreme gradient boosting; RF, random forest; LR, logistic regression; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; MAB, M. abscessus subspecies abscessus; MMAS, M. abscessus subspecies massiliense; NTM, nontuberculous mycobacteria; MTB-H37Ra, M. tuberculosis H37Ra.

Table I

Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the machine learning approach on the Raman spectral datasets with surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) sensors.

Table I

Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the machine learning approach on the Raman spectral datasets with surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) sensors.

 SERS at 15 ng/µl (785 nm)SERS at 50 ng/µl (785 nm)
Classification modelSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)Accuracy (%)F1-score (%)Sensitivity (%)Specificity (%)Accuracy (%)F1-score (%)
A, NTM group: MAB (n=5) and MMAS (n=5)
XGB94.7197.9196.2596.3293.2292.7392.9792.94
LDA77.5277.5977.6777.6381.0581.4781.2681.29
RF94.7197.9194.8196.3284.7093.4288.5889.17
LR92.2993.0292.6592.6892.1089.2790.6390.45
B, NTM group: MAB (n=5) and MMAS (n=5); MTB-H37Ra (n=1)
XGB97.1997.8397.2398.5199.1396.9798.9499.42
LDA98.1485.2597.1098.4299.7087.1898.4199.12
RF93.7810093.9496.7996.2010096.4198.06
LR99.8698.4699.7499.8699.8598.5799.7399.85

[i] The values were calculated as sensitivity=true positive/(true positive + false negative); specificity=true negative/(true negative + false positive); and accuracy=average sensitivity and specificity. SERS, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy; MAB, M. abscessus subspecies abscessus; MMAS, M. abscessus subspecies massiliense; MTB-H37Ra/H37Ra, M. tuberculosis H37Ra; NTM: nontuberculous mycobacterium; XGB, extreme gradient boosting; RF, random forest; LDA, linear discriminant analysis; LR, logistic regression.

Discussion

RS and SERS technologies offer several key advantages and hold potential utility in clinical diagnostics. These techniques enable high-throughput data generation, have rapid turnaround times and are cost-effective, rendering them efficient and accessible. Recently, RS has shown significant promise in the diagnosis of cancer (39,40), dengue fever (41), diabetes (1) and tuberculous meningitis (42). RS and SERS have also been applied in TB diagnosis (2). While MALDI-TOF MS is the main identification method for most NTM (43), M. abscessus and M. tuberculosis differentiation remains a challenge and M. abscessus identification at the subspecies level is limited. Some studies have attempted subspecies identification using protein peak analysis (44,45); however, this is not the best strategy to follow and requires validation with larger collections of clinical isolates to confirm utility in a microbiology laboratory setting.

SERS could be considered an improvement on MALDI-TOF MS with its ability to distinguish molecular biomolecules at subspecies resolution, higher sensitivity, lower sample volume requirement, lack of need for extensive sample pretreatment and special matrix reagents and shorter turnaround time (46). Compared with WGS (the gold standard for the M. abscessus complex), SERS also requires lower sample volumes and less preparation prior to analysis, has shorter processing times, and is considerably more cost-effective (47). Regarding long-term storage potential, nucleic acids (genomic SERS-based or WGS) exhibit far greater stability and longevity than proteins, which typically require immediate analysis following sample collection.

There is a need for novel approaches offering simple, rapid, cost-effective, and highly accurate discrimination of these bacteria at the species and subspecies levels. The present study was to establish a competence SERS model for differentiating genomic DNA of Mycobacterium species (NTM and MTB-H37Ra) and subspecies (MAB and MMAS), with the goal of developing a powerful tool for clinical diagnosis. However, the evaluations did not include clinical validation or testing on external datasets, which are critical points and should be addressed in future studies.

First, the minimal genomic DNA concentration required for the SERS technique was determined. DNA was detected for all three bacteria at concentrations of 5-50 ng/µl, indicating that these concentrations allow for the observation of characteristic signals in the Raman spectral range of 600-1,800 cm-¹ (25). SERS analysis was performed at both 15 and 50 ng/µl DNA concentrations; while higher concentrations yielded clearer peaks, peak detection was possible at the lower concentration, confirming high sensitivity. This aligns with previous findings of a strong SERS signal for DNA at ≥1 nM, with decreasing signal intensity at lower concentrations (48). These results demonstrate that SERS is effective even with limited sample amounts and that selecting appropriate DNA concentrations is crucial to avoid background interference and ensure accurate analysis.

The SERS spectra of genomic DNA from Mycobacterium species revealed several distinct characteristic bands, providing a foundation for bacterial differentiation. This analysis confirmed key spectral features previously reported for nucleic acids: the prominent bands at 726 cm-¹ (adenine) and 781 cm-¹ (cytosine) served as reliable markers for the nucleotide bases (26), while the 1,097 cm-¹ peak, corresponding to the phosphodioxy (PO2-) backbone (49), confirmed the presence of DNA. Distinct purine and pyrimidine markers were also observed, including bands for guanine (1,317 cm-¹) and adenine (1,331 cm-¹), which fall within the ‘DNA fingerprint’ region (26). The 1,486 cm-¹ peak indicates the hydrogen bonding state at guanine’s N7 site (50) and the 1,577 cm-¹ band is a key purine marker (27). The analysis also revealed a strong band at 755 cm-¹ (the vibrations from supercoiled DNA structures), a finding consistent with previous research (51). This suggested that SERS may be sensitive to secondary and tertiary structures. This structural information, combined with the complete SERS spectral fingerprint, could serve as a unique and powerful signature for distinguishing bacterial species.

Despite the fact that Mycobacterium species such as MAB/MMAS and MTB-H37Ra belong to the same genus (with the close genetic relationship between MAB and MMAS accounting for the broad similarity of their SERS Raman peaks), their distinct genetic makeup results in clear differences in their SERS spectra. This analysis revealed a notable distinction between MAB, MMAS and the MTB-H37Ra strain. Specifically, the peaks at 1,486 and 1,577 cm-¹ were prominent in MAB and MMAS but notably weaker in MTB-H37Ra and a strong peak at 928 cm-¹ was detected exclusively in the MTB-H37Ra spectrum. These molecular-level differences provide a unique ‘spectral fingerprint’, suggesting that the genetic distance between these organisms directly influences their SERS spectra and enables the discrimination of even closely related species. This capacity for differentiation based on subtle genetic and biochemical variations highlights the potential utility of SERS in bacterial identification and classification.

The spectra analyses revealed significant differences in eight key Raman peaks across the MAB, MMAS, and MTB-H37Ra genomic DNA samples. The boxplot analysis provided critical insight into the effect of DNA concentration and genetic relationship on SERS discrimination. At the low concentration of 15 ng/µl, the SERS spectra of the genetically similar MAB and MMAS were largely indistinguishable, but both were distinct from the more genetically distant MTB-H37Ra strain. This indicated that SERS effectively differentiates between species but has limited resolution for very closely related subspecies at lower concentrations. At the higher DNA concentration of 50 ng/µl, the spectral differences of all three bacteria were more pronounced, suggesting that a higher DNA concentration enhances the ability to detect subtle variations. Consequently, increasing the DNA concentration may improve the discriminatory power of SERS analysis, positioning it as a precise method of distinguishing even very closely related bacterial species.

LDA revealed clear clustering among MAB, MMAS and MTB-H37Ra, highlighting the potential of combining SERS with ML for bacterial differentiation. The XGB model effectively distinguished between the NTM (MAB vs. MMAS); the LR model was effective at distinguishing the NTM group from MTB-H37Ra, achieving the highest accuracy of 99.74%. ROC analysis confirmed the accuracy of the models. These findings align with a previous study reporting that ML methods achieved an average identification accuracy of 90.73% for 12 common pathogenic bacteria and a 99.92% accuracy in distinguishing between antibiotic-sensitive and -resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii (52).

Compared with MALDI-TOF MS, SERS represents a high-efficiency technique for identifying Mycobacterium species and subspecies. SERS uses purified genomic DNA, reducing the risk of sample contamination. Conversely, background noise from proteins in the culture media can present a challenge with MALDI-TOF MS. In addition, SERS utilizes a machine small enough to be developed into a portable POCT device, allowing for faster and more cost-effective processing; MALDI-TOF MS requires a larger processing area and is more expensive. SERS may therefore be preferable in clinics or areas with limited resources, making it a more practical tool in treatment settings.

In addition to SERS-based detection in mycobacterial studies, Perumal et al (53) and our work both emphasize the development of SERS-based models for Mycobacterium detection. Perumal et al (53) established successfully SERS spectra to characterize three major mycolic acid (MA) forms (α-MA, methoxy-MA and keto-MA) of MTB combining PCA and functional PCA for dimensionality reduction and LR, as well as LDA. By contrast, our study used genomic DNA to discriminate species (NTM vs. MTB-H37Ra) and NTM subspecies (MAB vs. MMAS). Here, we employed both supervised methods (LDA) and unsupervised methods (PCA and UMAP) for spectral clustering, alongside advanced ML algorithms (XGB, LR and RF) with LOOCV, which is likely to yield more rigorous insights and higher resolution. Collectively, these complementary approaches advance SERS-based technology toward comprehensive mycobacterial diagnostics.

Although these findings are promising for bacterial differentiation, it is crucial to address the limitations of the present study. The portable Raman spectrometer, while excellent for POCT, simpler, faster and more compact, has a lower resolution and sensitivity than benchtop systems, restricting its use to preliminary screening; parallel validation with conventional Raman is recommended. However, prior studies have reported that portable RS devices are sufficiently effective for medical and environmental biomolecule measurement (54-56). There is also the issue of the long-term stability of SERS chips as prolonged storage may alter surface and plasmonic activity, affecting signal reproducibility. In the present study, all SERS chips were vacuum-sealed during storage and used within 30 days of opening per the manufacturer protocol in a single experimental session.

Finally, the limited biological sample size, although partially mitigated by performing technical triplicates (75 spectra per sample), constrains the generalizability and predictive accuracy of the developed model. The current dataset, while providing initial insights, risks bias and overfitting due to the small, imbalanced distribution of isolates (such as 10 NTM vs. a single strain of MTB-H37Ra). However, reproducibility assessments of SERS spectra, and Pearson's and Spearman's correlation analysis were displayed as Fig. S1 and Table SIII. Expanding the sample size may improve the model and enhance the predictive power for reliable differentiation.

In conclusion, the present study represented a proof-of-concept study: Novel competence SERS models were successfully established using technology to differentiate Mycobacterium at the species and subspecies levels. The present study used a portable RS device which could be developed as a promising POCT in the future. SERS analysis combined with ML was effectively employed to characterize MAB and MMAS genomic DNA, establishing a valuable Raman spectral database for M. abscessus subspecies classification, as well as differentiating these from MTB-H37Ra. Detection was based on genomic DNA, a stable sample source for long-term storage, and was possible at very low concentrations (15 ng/µl). ML models, particularly XGB, achieved high classification accuracies of 96.25% (94.71% sensitivity, 97.91% specificity, and an AUC of 99%) for distinguishing between MAB and MMAS, with LR exceeding 99.74% accuracy (99.86% sensitivity, 98.46% specificity, and an AUC of 100%) for differentiating NTM from MTB-H37Ra. These findings demonstrated the potential utility of SERS in genomic-level infectious disease diagnosis.

Supplementary Material

Reproducibility of SERS spectra across different genomic DNA concentrations. The dot plots illustrate the coefficient of determination (R2) values obtained from genomic DNA at concentrations of (A) 15 ng/μl and (B) 50 ng/μl. The y-axis indicates the R2 values, reflecting the degree of the correlation and consistency between replicates. The x-axis denotes the specific bacterial isolate tested: MAB, MMAS, and MTB-H37Ra. Numbers (1, 2 and 3) under each isolate represent independent technical replicates. The high R2 values (mostly >0.8) observed across both concentrations and all strains demonstrate the high precision and reliability of the method. SERS, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy; MAB, M. abscessus subspecies abscessus; MMAS, M. abscessus subspecies massiliense; MTB-H37Ra/H37Ra, M. tuberculosis H37Ra.
Accession numbers of Mycobacterium species and subspecies used.
Specific DNA-related Raman shifts and their corresponding peak assignments.
Reproducibility assessment of SERS spectra via Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation analysis.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: The present study was supported by a research grant for supporting lecturer to admit high potential student to study and research on his expert program year 2022 (grant no. 651JH114), joint funding of Graduate school and Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University and the Invitation Research Funding (grant no. IN 67080), Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University. Khon Kaen, Thailand.

Availability of data and materials

The data generated in the present study may be requested from the corresponding author.

Authors' contributions

AP was responsible for conceptualization, review, sample administration, data curation, data analysis and writing the original draft. TDT, PK and CJ were responsible for sample administration and data curation. JE was responsible for data analysis and software consultancy. AP, TDT and JE confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. BK, CP, WN, KS and SC were responsible for conceptualization, review and editing. KF was responsible for conceptualization, funding, review and editing. WP was responsible for conceptualization, funding, data analysis, editing, finalized manuscript and corresponding. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Khon Kaen University Ethics Committee for Human Research in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki (approval no. HE 591454). Leftover clinical specimens were provided for the completion of the present study.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Guevara E, Torres-Galván JC, Ramírez-Elías MG, Luevano-Contreras C and González FJ: Use of Raman spectroscopy to screen diabetes mellitus with machine learning tools. Biomed Opt Express. 9:4998–5010. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Khan S, Ullah R, Shahzad S, Anbreen N, Bilal M and Khan A: Analysis of tuberculosis disease through Raman spectroscopy and machine learning. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 24:286–291. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Ravanshad R, Karimi Zadeh A, Amani AM, Mousavi SM, Hashemi SA, Savar Dashtaki A, Mirzaei E and Zare B: Application of nanoparticles in cancer detection by Raman scattering based techniques. Nano Rev Exp. 9(1373551)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Zhang C, Winnard PT Jr, Dasari S, Kominsky SL, Doucet M, Jayaraman S, Raman V and Barman I: Label-free Raman spectroscopy provides early determination and precise localization of breast cancer-colonized bone alterations. Chem Sci. 9:743–753. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Li Z, Li Z, Chen Q, Zhang J, Dunham ME, McWhorter AJ, Feng JM, Li Y, Yao S and Xu J: Machine-learning-assisted spontaneous Raman spectroscopy classification and feature extraction for the diagnosis of human laryngeal cancer. Comput Biol Med. 146(105617)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Wu UI and Holland SM: Host susceptibility to non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections. Lancet Infect Dis. 15:968–980. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Cassidy PM, Hedberg K, Saulson A, McNelly E and Winthrop KL: Nontuberculous mycobacterial disease prevalence and risk factors: A changing epidemiology. Clin Infect Dis. 49:e124–e129. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Ide S, Nakamura S, Yamamoto Y, Kohno Y, Fukuda Y, Ikeda H, Sasaki E, Yanagihara K, Higashiyama Y, Hashiguchi K, et al: Epidemiology and clinical features of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacteriosis in Nagasaki, Japan. PLoS One. 10(e0128304)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Shah SK, McAnally KJ, Seoane L, Lombard GA, LaPlace SG, Lick S, Dhillon GS and Valentine VG: Analysis of pulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections after lung transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis. 18:585–591. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Lee MR, Yang CY, Shu CC, Lin CK, Wen YF, Lee SW, Ko JC, Wang JY, Lee LN and Yu CJ: Factors associated with subsequent nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease in patients with a single sputum isolate on initial examination. Clin Microbiol Infect. 21:250.e1–e7. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Jeong J, Kim SR, Chang CL and Lee SH: Identification of mycobacteria species by HPLC and species distribution during five years at Ulsan university hospital. Korean J Lab Med. 28:24–33. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In Korean).

12 

Kehrmann J, Kurt N, Rueger K, Bange FC and Buer J: GenoType NTM-DR for identifying Mycobacterium abscessus subspecies and determining molecular resistance. J Clin Microbiol. 54:1653–1655. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Kham-Ngam I, Chetchotisakd P, Ananta P, Chaimanee P, Reechaipichitkul W, Lulitanond V, Namwat W and Faksri K: Differentiation between persistent infection/colonization and re-infection/re-colonization of Mycobacterium abscessus isolated from patients in Northeast Thailand. Infect Genet Evol. 68:35–42. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Kwon YS and Koh WJ: Diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease in Korea. Tuberc Respir Dis. 77:1–5. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Pfyffer GE: Mycobacterium: General characteristics, laboratory detection, and staining procedures. In Manual of Clinical Microbiology. Jorgensen JH, Carroll KC, Funke G, Pfaller MA, Landry ML, Richter SS, Warnock DW, Carroll KC, Bernard KA, Dumler JS, et al (eds). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., pp536-569, 2015.

16 

Dingle TC and Butler-Wu SM: Maldi-tof mass spectrometry for microorganism identification. Clin Lab Med. 33:589–609. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Nithimongkolchai N, Hinwan Y, Kaewseekhao B, Chareonsudjai P, Reungsang P, Kraiklang R, Chareonsudjai S, Wonglakorn L, Chetchotisakd P, Sirichoat A, et al: MALDI-TOF MS analysis of Burkholderia pseudomallei and closely related species isolated from soils and water in Khon Kaen, Thailand. Infect Genet Evol. 116(105532)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott BA, Catanzaro A, Daley C, Gordin F, Holland SM, Horsburgh R, Huitt G, Iademarco MF, et al: An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 175:367–416. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Kaewprasert O, Nonghanphithak D, Chetchotisakd P, Namwat W, Ong RTH and Faksri K: Whole-genome sequencing and drug-susceptibility analysis of serial Mycobacterium abscessus isolates from Thai patients. Biology (Basel). 11(1319)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Esposito A, Bonifacio A, Sergo V and Fornasaro S: Label-free surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) on centrifugal silver plasmonic paper (CSPP): A novel methodology for unprocessed biofluids sampling and analysis. Biosensors (Basel). 11(467)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Changsen C, Franzblau SG and Palittapongarnpim P: Improved green fluorescent protein reporter gene-based microplate screening for antituberculosis compounds by utilizing an acetamidase promoter. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 47:3682–3687. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Zheng H, Lu L, Wang B, Pu S, Zhang X, Zhu G, Shi W, Zhang L, Wang H, Wang S, et al: Genetic basis of virulence attenuation revealed by comparative genomic analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain H37Ra versus H37Rv. PLoS One. 3(e2375)2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

De Almeida IN, Da Silva Carvalho W, Rossetti ML, Costa ER and De Miranda SS: Evaluation of six different DNA extraction methods for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by means of PCR-IS6110: Preliminary study. BMC Res Notes. 6(561)2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Botta R, Chindaudom P, Eiamchai P, Horprathum M, Limwichean S, Chananonnawathorn C, Patthanasettakul V, Kaewseekhao B, Faksri K and Nuntawong N: Tuberculosis determination using SERS and chemometric methods. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 108:195–200. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Alunni Cardinali M, Casagrande Pierantoni D, Caponi S, Corte L, Fioretto D and Cardinali G: Meso-Raman approach for rapid yeast cells identification. Biophys Chem. 254(106249)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Boiko VV, Romanyuk VR, Gnatyuk OP, Ilchenko OO, Karakhim SO, Korovin AV and Dovbeshko GI: Vibrational spectra of DNA in the confined interglobular volume of photonic crystal. J Biol Phys. 44:101–116. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Prescott B, Steinmetz W and Thomas GJ Jr: Characterization of DNA structures by laser Raman spectroscopy. Biopolymers. 23:235–256. 1984.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Serban D, Benevides JM and Thomas GJ Jr: DNA secondary structure and Raman markers of supercoiling in Escherichia coli plasmid pUC19. Biochemistry. 41:847–853. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Neugebauer U, Clement JH, Bocklitz T, Krafft C and Popp J: Identification and differentiation of single cells from peripheral blood by Raman spectroscopic imaging. J Biophotonics. 3:579–587. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Matthews Q, Jirasek A, Lum J, Duan X and Brolo AG: Variability in Raman spectra of single human tumor cells cultured in vitro: Correlation with cell cycle and culture confluency. Appl Spectrosc. 64:871–887. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Kim J, Park HJ, Kim JH, Chang B and Park HK: Label-free detection for a DNA methylation assay using Raman spectroscopy. Chin Med J (Engl). 130:1961–1967. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Zangana S, Veres M and Bonyár A: Surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy (SERS)-Based sensors for deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) detection. Molecules. 29(3338)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Maquelin K, Choo-Smith LP, Endtz HP, Bruining HA and Puppels GJ: Rapid identification of Candida species by confocal Raman microspectroscopy. J Clin Microbiol. 40:594–600. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Movasaghi Z, Rehman S and Rehman IU: Raman spectroscopy of biological tissues. Appl Spectrosc Rev. 42:493–541. 2007.

35 

Kendall C, Hutchings J, Barr H, Shepherd N and Stone N: Exploiting the diagnostic potential of biomolecular fingerprinting with vibrational spectroscopy. Faraday Discuss. 149:279–290, 333-356. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Liu Z, Davis C, Cai W, He L, Chen X and Dai H: Circulation and long-term fate of functionalized, biocompatible single-walled carbon nanotubes in mice probed by Raman spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:1410–1415. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Huang H, Shi H, Feng S, Chen W, Yu Y, Lin D and Chen R: Confocal Raman spectroscopic analysis of the cytotoxic response to cisplatin in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Anal Methods. 5:260–266. 2013.

38 

Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V, et al: Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res. 12:2825–2830. 2011.

39 

Feng X, Fox MC, Reichenberg JS, Lopes FCPS, Sebastian KR, Dunn AK, Markey MK and Tunnell JW: Superpixel Raman spectroscopy for rapid skin cancer margin assessment. J Biophotonics. 13(e201960109)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Traynor D, Duraipandian S, Bhatia R, Cuschieri K, Martin CM, O'Leary JJ and Lyng FM: The potential of biobanked liquid based cytology samples for cervical cancer screening using Raman spectroscopy. J Biophotonics. 12(e201800377)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

41 

Naseer K, Amin A, Saleem M and Qazi J: Raman spectroscopy based differentiation of typhoid and dengue fever in infected human sera. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 206:197–201. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Sathyavathi R, Dingari NC, Barman I, Prasad PSR, Prabhakar S, Narayana Rao D, Dasari RR and Undamatla J: Raman spectroscopy provides a powerful, rapid diagnostic tool for the detection of tuberculous meningitis in ex vivo cerebrospinal fluid samples. J Biophotonics. 6:567–672. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

43 

Rodriguez L, Zhang Z and Wang D: Recent advances of Raman spectroscopy for the analysis of bacteria. Anal Sci Adv. 4:81–95. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

44 

Fangous MS, Mougari F, Gouriou S, Calvez E, Raskine L, Cambau E, Payan C and Héry-Arnaud G: Classification algorithm for subspecies identification within the Mycobacterium abscessus species, based on matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol. 52:3362–3369. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

45 

Panagea T, Pincus DH, Grogono D, Jones M, Bryant J, Parkhill J, Floto RA and Gilligan P: Mycobacterium abscessus complex identification with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol. 53:2355–2358. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

46 

Takei S, Teramoto K, Sekiguchi Y, Ihara H, Tohya M, Iwamoto S, Tanaka K, Khasawneh A, Horiuchi Y, Misawa S, et al: Identification of Mycobacterium abscessus using the peaks of ribosomal protein L29, L30 and hemophore-related protein by MALDI-MS proteotyping. Sci Rep. 14(11187)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

47 

Wang Y, Zhang Z, Sun Y, Wu H, Luo L and Song Y: Recent advances in surface-enhanced raman scattering for pathogenic bacteria detection: A review. Sensors (Basel). 25(1370)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

48 

Van Lierop D, Faulds K and Graham D: Separation free DNA detection using surface enhanced Raman scattering. Anal Chem. 83:5817–5821. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

49 

Movileanu L, Benevides JM and Thomas GJ Jr: Temperature dependence of the Raman spectrum of DNA. II. Raman signatures of premelting and melting transitions of poly(dA).poly(dT) and comparison with poly(dA-dT).poly(dA-dT). Biopolymers. 63:181–194. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

50 

Benevides JM, Li T, Lu XJ, Srinivasan AR, Olson WK, Weiss MA and Thomas GJ Jr: Protein-directed DNA structure II. Raman spectroscopy of a leucine zipper bZIP complex. Biochemistry. 39:548–556. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

51 

Christens-Barry WA, Martin JC and Lebowitz J: Raman spectroscopy of supercoiled and nicked ColE1 plasmid. Biopolymers. 28:1515–1526. 1989.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

52 

Lu W, Li H, Qiu H, Wang L, Feng J and Fu YV: Identification of pathogens and detection of antibiotic susceptibility at single-cell resolution by Raman spectroscopy combined with machine learning. Front Microbiol. 13(1076965)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

53 

Perumal J, Dinish U, Bendt AK, Kazakeviciute A, Fu CY, Ong ILH and Olivo M: Identification of mycolic acid forms using surface-enhanced Raman scattering as a fast detection method for tuberculosis. Int J Nanomedicine. 13:6029–6038. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

54 

Khongkaew P, Cruz J, Bertotto JP, Cárdenas V, Alcalà M, Nuchtavorn N and Phechkrajang C: A comparative study of benchtop and portable NIR and Raman spectroscopic methods for the quantitative determination of curcuminoids in turmeric powder. Foods. 11(2187)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

55 

Hernández-Jiménez M, Revilla I, Vivar-Quintana AM, Grabska J, Beć KB and Huck CW: Performance of benchtop and portable spectroscopy equipment for discriminating Iberian ham according to breed. Curr Res Food Sci. 8(100675)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

56 

Brawley HN, Juárez ID, Kurouski D, Zwart SR and Smith SM: Feasibility of portable Raman SERS for blood biomarker monitoring in spaceflight conditions. Life Sci Space Res (Amst). 48:216–224. 2026.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

  • Abstract
  • View
  • Download
  • Twitter
Copy and paste a formatted citation
Spandidos Publications style
Pichitphorn A, Faksri K, Kaewseekhao B, Potisap C, Duong Thai T, Eisiri J, Juntagran C, Namwat W, Khwansirikul P, Salao K, Salao K, et al: Establishing a competence model in discriminating <em>Mycobacterium</em> species and <em>Mycobacterium abscessus</em> subspecies by using surface‑enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Biomed Rep 25: 81, 2026.
APA
Pichitphorn, A., Faksri, K., Kaewseekhao, B., Potisap, C., Duong Thai, T., Eisiri, J. ... Phoksawat, W. (2026). Establishing a competence model in discriminating <em>Mycobacterium</em> species and <em>Mycobacterium abscessus</em> subspecies by using surface‑enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Biomedical Reports, 25, 81. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2026.2154
MLA
Pichitphorn, A., Faksri, K., Kaewseekhao, B., Potisap, C., Duong Thai, T., Eisiri, J., Juntagran, C., Namwat, W., Khwansirikul, P., Salao, K., Chaisri, S., Phoksawat, W."Establishing a competence model in discriminating <em>Mycobacterium</em> species and <em>Mycobacterium abscessus</em> subspecies by using surface‑enhanced Raman spectroscopy". Biomedical Reports 25.1 (2026): 81.
Chicago
Pichitphorn, A., Faksri, K., Kaewseekhao, B., Potisap, C., Duong Thai, T., Eisiri, J., Juntagran, C., Namwat, W., Khwansirikul, P., Salao, K., Chaisri, S., Phoksawat, W."Establishing a competence model in discriminating <em>Mycobacterium</em> species and <em>Mycobacterium abscessus</em> subspecies by using surface‑enhanced Raman spectroscopy". Biomedical Reports 25, no. 1 (2026): 81. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2026.2154
Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Pichitphorn A, Faksri K, Kaewseekhao B, Potisap C, Duong Thai T, Eisiri J, Juntagran C, Namwat W, Khwansirikul P, Salao K, Salao K, et al: Establishing a competence model in discriminating <em>Mycobacterium</em> species and <em>Mycobacterium abscessus</em> subspecies by using surface‑enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Biomed Rep 25: 81, 2026.
APA
Pichitphorn, A., Faksri, K., Kaewseekhao, B., Potisap, C., Duong Thai, T., Eisiri, J. ... Phoksawat, W. (2026). Establishing a competence model in discriminating <em>Mycobacterium</em> species and <em>Mycobacterium abscessus</em> subspecies by using surface‑enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Biomedical Reports, 25, 81. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2026.2154
MLA
Pichitphorn, A., Faksri, K., Kaewseekhao, B., Potisap, C., Duong Thai, T., Eisiri, J., Juntagran, C., Namwat, W., Khwansirikul, P., Salao, K., Chaisri, S., Phoksawat, W."Establishing a competence model in discriminating <em>Mycobacterium</em> species and <em>Mycobacterium abscessus</em> subspecies by using surface‑enhanced Raman spectroscopy". Biomedical Reports 25.1 (2026): 81.
Chicago
Pichitphorn, A., Faksri, K., Kaewseekhao, B., Potisap, C., Duong Thai, T., Eisiri, J., Juntagran, C., Namwat, W., Khwansirikul, P., Salao, K., Chaisri, S., Phoksawat, W."Establishing a competence model in discriminating <em>Mycobacterium</em> species and <em>Mycobacterium abscessus</em> subspecies by using surface‑enhanced Raman spectroscopy". Biomedical Reports 25, no. 1 (2026): 81. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2026.2154
Follow us
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
About
  • Spandidos Publications
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
How can we help?
  • Help
  • Live Chat
  • Contact
  • Email to our Support Team