Claudin-4 expression is associated with tumor invasion, MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression in gastric cancer

  • Authors:
    • Tsann-Long Hwang
    • Li-Yu Lee
    • Chee-Chan Wang
    • Ying Liang
    • Shu-Fang Huang
    • Chi-Ming Wu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: July 12, 2010     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2010.116
  • Pages: 789-797
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Claudin-4 is a member of the claudin family, a large family of transmembrane proteins that are essential in the formation and maintenance of tight junctions. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and -9 degrade type IV collagen of the extracellular matrix and basal membranes. Claudin-4 activates MMP-2, indicating that claudin-mediated increased cancer cell invasion may result from the activation of MMP proteins. In the present study, we used immunohistochemistry to examine the expression levels of claudin-4, MMP-2 and MMP-9 in 189 gastric cancer samples, and analyzed their correlation with tumor invasion, clinicopathologic parameters and clinical outcome. The relationship between claudin-4 expression and MMP-2 and -9 expression was also investigated. The expression of claudin-4 was found to be significantly higher in gastric cancer cases with advanced depth of wall invasion, lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion and higher TNM stage. Further analysis revealed claudin-4 expression to be significantly correlated with the expression of MMP-2 and -9. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated that MMP-9 expression was correlated with poor prognosis. These results suggest that claudin-4 expression is associated with tumor invasion and with MMP-2 and -9 expression in gastric cancer. Additionally, MMP-9 expression was demonstrated to serve as a prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer.

Introduction

Claudins are tight junctional proteins which are present at the epithelial and endothelial cell membranes (1,2), and are the major integral membrane proteins forming the backbone of tight junctions. Tight junctions form the primary barrier to the paracellular transport of solutes across cells, and also play a critical role in establishing and maintaining epithelial cell polarity (3,4). The claudin family consists of 23 transmembrane proteins exhibiting distinct tissue- and development-specific distribution patterns (5). The carboxylic terminal region of claudin proteins contains a PDZ domain-binding motif that potentially interacts with a number of PDZ domain-containing proteins, such as ZO proteins (6,7). These interactions also serve as adapters for other proteins involved in cell signaling. A number of other cytosolic and nuclear proteins, including regulatory proteins such as Rab3b, tumor suppressors such as PTEN and transcription factors such as ZONAB, also interact directly or indirectly with the tight junction complex (810). These interactions suggest that tight junctions, in addition to acting as barriers to the paracellular flow of solutes, may play an important role in regulating other cell functions, such as proliferation and tumor suppression.

Modulations in tight junction structure and function have been observed in epithelial tumorigenesis (11,12). A tissue microarray study showed that claudin-1, -3 and -4 are strongly expressed in most cases of intestinal-type gastric cancer, but are less frequently expressed in diffuse-type gastric cancer (13). Using cDNA microarray and immunohistochemical analysis, our group previously showed that the expression of claudin-4 was significantly higher in intestinal-type than in diffuse-type gastric cancer (14,15). Other studies have shown that claudin-2 expression gradually increases during the multistage process of gastric carcinogenesis (16,17). In addition, several studies have found aberrant claudin expression in various types of cancer, including increased expression of claudin-3 and -4 in prostate and uterine cancers (18,19), high claudin-4 expression in pancreatic cancer (20), down-regulation of claudin-7 in head and neck cancer (21) and metastatic breast cancer (22), and an increase in claudin-3 and -4 in breast cancer (23). However, the exact role of claudin overexpression and the functional importance of these proteins in the development of gastric cancer remain unclear.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors of the alimentary tract. At the time of diagnosis, it usually shows extensive local tumor invasion and frequent spread to metastatic sites, particularly the lymph nodes. It is thus characterized by late clinical presentation, rapid progression and a poor survival prognosis (24). The spread of malignant tumors is a multistep process, and many of the stages of tumor invasion require degradation or breakdown of the extracellular matrix and connective tissue surrounding tumor cells (25,26). The matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a family of zinc-containing enzymes involved in the degradation of different components of the extracellular matrix. There is considerable evidence indicating that individual MMPs play crucial roles in tumor invasion and tumor spread (2732). Some studies have suggested a major role for MMP-2 and -9 in the digestion of basement membrane type IV collagen as an important mechanism for vessal invasion and metastasis in gastric cancer (33,34).

Recent studies have indicated the modulatory effects of claudins on MMP activation. Agarwal et al showed that claudin-3 and -4 expression in ovarian epithelial cells enhanced invasion and was associated with increased MMP-2 activity (35). Oku et al showed that claudin-1 enhanced the invasive activity of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells by promoting the cleavage of the laminin-5 γ2 chain via MMP-2 and membrane-type MMP-1 (36). Takehara et al revealed that the overexpression of claudin-4 specifically stimulated the invasive activity of colonic cancer cells and increased MMP-2 and -9 activity (37). In the present study, we examined the expression levels of claudin-4, MMP-2 and -9 in gastric cancer in order to analyze their correlation with tumor invasion, clinicopathologic parameters and clinical outcome of gastric cancer patients. We also investigated the relationship between claudin-4 expression and MMP-2 and -9 expression in gastric cancer.

Materials and methods

Patients and specimens

A consecutive series of 189 tissue specimens was collected from patients with gastric cancer who underwent subtotal or total resection by gastrectomy at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH), Taiwan between January 2001 and December 2002. Written informed consent was obtained before sample collection, and the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of CGMH. The patients comprised 110 males and 79 females with a mean age of 62 years (range 24–90). The age and gender of the patients, tumor location, tumor size, cell differentiation, depth of wall invasion, status of lymph node metastasis, vascular invasion, lymphatic invasion and desmoplastic reaction were obtained from histopathology records. The stage of gastric cancer was described according to the 1997 tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification of malignant tumors of the American Joint Committee on Cancer. Follow-up was conducted until December 2007, for a minimum follow-up time of 5 years. The tissue specimens were formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded, then stained with H&E and classified by a pathologist. The results were compared to histopathology records from CGMH. Final pathology was determined by consensus, with review if necessary.

Immunohistochemistry

Tissue blocks were constructed according to the method of Schraml et al (38), and the most representative morphological areas of the tumors were used in the study. The specimen sections were deparaffinized, treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide and microwaved after pre-treatment in 10 mM citric acid to retrieve antigenicity. The sections were incubated with blocking solution containing PBS and 1% bovine serum albumin for 20 min at room temperature, and then incubated overnight at 4°C with an anti-claudin-4 antibody (1:100; Zymed, San Francisco, CA, USA), an anti-MMP-2 monoclonal antibody (1:50; Lab Vision Corporation, Fremont, CA, USA) and an anti-MMP-9 monoclonal antibody (1:50; Lab Vision Corporation), respectively. After washing 4 times with Tris-buffered saline, the sections were incubated with biotinylated secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). The immunocomplex was visualized by the immonoglobulin enzyme bridge technique using the Dako LSAB 2 System, HRP kit (Dako Corp., Carpinteria, CA, USA) with 3,3'diaminobenzidine tetrachloride as a substrate. The sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated with graded alcohol, cleared with xylene and mounted with coverslips.

Scoring of immunostaining

The results of immunostaining were scored according to a previous report (39) as follows: the immunostaining reaction was evaluated by subjective assessments of the median staining intensity (0, no stain; 1, weak; 2, moderate; 3, strong stain) and by the fraction of stained cells in percentage categories (0, 0–9%; 1, 10–49%; 2, 50–89%; and 3, ≥90%). This scoring system was previously shown to be reproducible (40). Scores of 0–3 were determined as follows: percentage categories and staining were each ranked as indicated above. The ranks for percentage and staining intensity were multiplied by each other, divided by 3 and rounded up to the nearest whole number (40). The results of immunostaining were classified as negative (whole number 0) or positive (whole number 1–3), respectively (Fig. 1).

Statistical analysis

The χ2 test or Fisher's exact test were used to test for an association between claudin-4, MMP-2 and -9 expression and the clinicopathologic parameters of the patients. Disease-free survival was defined as the time from surgery to the first relapse of cancer, occurence of a second primary tumor or death of any cause. Univariate survival analysis was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the significance of differences between groups was analyzed using the log rank test or the log rank test for trend. Stepwise multivariate survival analysis was performed according to the Cox proportional hazards model. All reported P-values were two-sided, and P-values <0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Claudin-4, MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression in gastric cancer

Claudin-4 was expressed in the membrane of gastric adenocarcinoma cells in 84.7% (160/189) of cases. MMP-2 and -9 were expressed in the cytoplasm of gastric adenocarcinoma cells in 81% (153/189) and 89.4% (169/189) of the cases, respectively (Fig. 1).

Claudin-4, MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression in relation to clinicopathologic parameters

The expression of claudin-4 was significantly higher in males than in females (P=0.046), and was positively correlated with tumor size (P=0.008) and desmoplastic reaction (P=0.027). The expression of claudin-4 was significantly higher in gastric cancer with advanced depth of wall invasion (P=0.008), lymph node metastasis (P=0.005), lymphatic invasion (P=0.001) and high TNM stage (P=0.004), but was not correlated with age, tumor location, cell differentiation or vascular invasion (Table I).

Table I.

Association of claudin-4, MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression with clinicopathologic parameters.

Table I.

Association of claudin-4, MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression with clinicopathologic parameters.

FactorsCasesClaudin-4 expression
MMP-2 expression
MMP-9 expression
Negative n (%)Positive n (%)P-valueNegative n (%)Positive n (%)P-valueNegative n (%)Positive n (%)P-value
n=29n=160n=36n=153n=20n=169
Age (years)
  ≤608115 (51.7)66 (41.3)0.29418 (50.0)63 (41.2)0.3369 (45.0)72 (42.6)0.838
  >6010814 (48.3)94 (58.8)18 (50.0)90 (58.8)11 (55.0)97 (57.4)
Gender
  Male11012 (41.4)98 (61.2)0.04616 (44.4)94 (61.4)0.0368 (40.0)102 (60.4)0.081
  Female7917 (58.6)62 (38.8)20 (55.6)59 (38.6)12 (60.0)67 (39.6)
Tumor location
  Lesser curvature lesion407 (24.1)33 (20.6)0.55414 (38.9)26 (17.0)0.014 (20.0)36 (21.3)0.569
  Prepyloric12120 (69.0)101 (63.1)21 (58.3)100 (65.4)15 (75.0)106 (62.7)
  Proximal cardioesophageal212 (6.9)19 (11.9)1 (2.8)20 (13.1)1 (5.0)20 (11.8)
  Diffuse70 (0.0)7 (4.4)0 (0.0)7 (4.6)0 (0.0)7 (4.1)
Tumor size (cm)
  ≤39421 (72.4)73 (45.6)0.00824 (66.7)70 (45.8)0.02416 (80.0)78 (46.2)0.004
  >3958 (27.6)87 (54.4)12 (33.3)83 (54.2)4 (20.0)91 (53.8)
Differentiation
  Well181 (3.4)17 (10.6)0.2260 (0.0)18 (11.8)0.040 (0.0)18 (10.7)0.153
  Moderate536 (20.7)47 (29.4)8 (22.2)45 (29.4)4 (20.0)49 (29.0)
  Poor11822 (75.9)96 (60.0)28 (77.8)90 (58.8)16 (80.0)102 (60.3)
Depth of wall invasion
  T14714 (48.3)33 (20.6)0.00814 (38.9)33 (21.6)0.15112 (60.0)35 (20.7)0.002
  T2355 (17.2)30 (18.8)7 (9.4)28 (18.3)3 (15.0)32 (18.9)
  T39210 (34.5)82 (51.3)13 (6.1)79 (51.6)4 (20.0)88 (52.1)
  T4150 (0.0)15 (9.4)2 (5.6)13 (8.5)1 (5.0)14 (8.3)
Lymph node metastasis
  N08622 (75.9)64 (40.0)0.00522 (61.1)64 (41.8)0.18615 (75.0)71 (42.0)0.038
  N1443 (10.3)41 (25.6)5 (13.9)39 (25.5)2 (10.0)42 (24.9)
  N2221 (3.4)21 (13.1)4 (11.1)18 (11.8)2 (10.0)20 (11.8)
  N3373 (10.3)34 (21.3)5 (13.9)32 (20.9)1 (5.0)36 (21.3)
Vascular invasion
  No16528 (96.6)137 (85.6)0.13434 (94.4)131 (85.6)0.2630 (0.0)24 (14.2)0.082
  Yes241 (3.4)23 (14.4)2 (5.6)22 (14.4)20 (100.0)145 (85.8)
Lymphatic invasion
  No10224 (82.8)78 (48.8)0.00122 (61.1)80 (52.3)0.3395 (25.0)82 (48.5)0.046
  Yes875 (17.2)82 (51.2)14 (38.9)73 (47.7)15 (75.0)87 (51.5)
Desmoplastic reaction
  None299 (31.0)20 (12.5)0.03411 (30.6)18 (11.8)0.0285 (25.0)24 (14.2)0.021
  Mild6211 (37.9)51 (31.9)11 (30.6)51 (33.3)11 (55.0)51 (30.2)
  Moderate737 (24.1)66 (41.3)12 (33.3)61 (39.7)4 (20.0)69 (40.8)
  Marked252 (6.9)23 (14.4)2 (5.6)23 (15.0)0 (0.0)25 (14.8)
TNM stage
  I6718 (62.1)49 (30.6)0.00422 (61.1)64 (41.8)0.18614 (70.0)53 (31.4)0.008
  II376 (20.7)31 (19.4)5 (13.9)39 (25.5)1 (5.0)36 (21.3)
  III371 (3.4)36 (22.5)4 (11.1)18 (11.8)2 (10.0)35 (20.7)
  IV484 (13.8)44 (27.5)5 (13.9)32 (20.9)3 (15.0)45 (26.6)

The expression of MMP-2 was significantly higher in males than in females (P=0.036), and was significantly correlated with tumor location (P=0.01), tumor size (P=0.024), cell differentiation (P=0.04) and desmoplastic reaction (P=0.021), but not with age, depth of wall invasion, lymph node metastasis, vascular invasion, lymphatic invasion or TNM stage (Table I).

MMP-9 expression was positively correlated with tumor size (P=0.004) and desmoplastic reaction (P=0.02). As with claudin-4, the expression of MMP-9 was significantly higher in gastric cancer with advanced depth of wall invasion (P=0.002), lymph node metastasis (P=0.038), lymphatic invasion (P=0.046) and higher TNM stage (P=0.008), but was not correlated with age, gender, tumor location, cell differentiation or vascular invasion (Table I).

Correlation of claudin-4 expression with MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression

Further analysis of the relationship between claudin-4 expression and MMP-2 and -9 expression revealed claudin-4 expression to be significantly correlated with the expression of these two proteins (P=0.005 and 0.018, respectively; Table II). To better define the pattern of co-expression between claudin-4 and these two proteins, immunostaining was conducted in serial sections of gastric cancer. Of 189 specimens, 135 (71.4%) were positive for claudin-4- and MMP-2, and 147 (77.8%) were positive for claudin-4- and MMP-9 (Table II and Fig. 2).

Table II.

Association of claudin-4 expression with MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression.

Table II.

Association of claudin-4 expression with MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression.

Claudin-4 expression
FactorsNegative n (%)Positive n (%)P-value
n=29n=160
MMP-2 expression
  Negative (−)11 (37.9)25 (15.6)0.005
  Positive (+)18 (62.1)135 (84.4)
MMP-9 expression
  Negative (−)7 (24.1)13 (8.1)0.018
  Positive (+)22 (75.9)147 (91.9)
Prognostic implications of claudin-4, MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression in gastric cancer

MMP-9 expression was correlated with a poor prognosis (P=0.041; Table III and Fig. 3C). Neither claudin-4 nor MMP-2 expression was correlated with survival (Table III, Fig. 3A and B). Other prognostic factors were type of gastrectomy, tumor location, large tumor size, poor cell differentiation, advanced penetration depth, presence of nodal metastases, presence of vascular or lymphatic invasion, marked desmoplastic reaction and higher stage. In multivariate analysis, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis and lymphatic invasion were independent prognostic factors (Table IV).

Table III.

Univariate analysis of the clinicopathologic parameters influencing disease-free survival in 189 gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy.

Table III.

Univariate analysis of the clinicopathologic parameters influencing disease-free survival in 189 gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy.

FactorsNo. casesMean survival (months)95% CI of mean5-year survival (%)P-value
Age (years)
  ≤608154.646.9–62.358.80.7750
  >6010854.948.1–61.761.2
Gender
  Male11058.552.0–65.065.10.0820
  Female7949.641.6–57.753.3
Type of gastrectomy
  Total4229.320.2–38.433.8<0.0001
  Subtotal14760.855.4–66.167.7
Tumor location
  Lesser curvature lesion4065.956.7–75.174.5<0.0001
  Prepyloric12156.750.4–62.962.3
  Proximal cardioesophageal2124.813.2–36.430.2
  Diffuse722.94.5–41.328.6
Tumor size (cm)
  ≤39472.267.2–77.183.4<0.0001
  >39536.929.5–44.236.0
Differentiation
  Well1865.459.0–71.994.40.0190
  Moderate5343.735.2–52.258.1
  Poor11852.646.1–59.051.5
Depth of invasion
  T14779.475.0–83.795.7<0.0001
  T23574.267.2–81.385.4
  T39239.332.1–48.538.9
  T4158.24.6–11.70.0
Lymph node metastasis
  N08674.970.6–79.386.6<0.0001
  N14460.250.0–70.469.6
  N22227.216.1–38.326.0
  N33711.27.0–15.40.0
Vascular invasion
  No16560.955.9–66.068.1<0.0001
  Yes2411.15.4–16.94.5
Lymphatic invasion
  No10271.366.5–76.281.5<0.0001
  Yes8734.727.1–42.434.3
Desmoplastic reaction
  None2967.456.5–78.279.3<0.0001
  Mild6273.367.7–79.084.4
  Moderate7338.130.0–46.237.9
  Marked2534.521.3–47.839.5
TNM stage
  I6779.476.3–82.693.9<0.0001
  II3770.161.8–78.478.9
  III3744.833.5–56.047.6
  IV4810.46.9–13.90.0
Claudin-4
  Negative2964.253.0–75.371.50.1690
  Positive16053.047.3–58.658.0
MMP-2
  Negative3663.053.5–72.671.50.1120
  Positive15352.446.6–58.257.4
MMP-9
  Negative2068.356.0–80.784.20.0410
  Positive16952.947.5–58.357.2

[i] CI, confidence interval.

Table IV.

Multivariate Cox's proportional hazards analysis for disease-free survival of 189 gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy.

Table IV.

Multivariate Cox's proportional hazards analysis for disease-free survival of 189 gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy.

FactorsRelative risk (95% CI)P-value
Depth of invasion<0.0001
  T2 vs. T15.543 (0.962–31.950)0.0550
  T3 vs.T120.420 (4.023–103.659)0.0003
  T4 vs. T135.392 (6.037–207.466)<0.0001
Lymph node metastasis0.0005
  N1 vs. N01.926 (0.831–4.465)0.1270
  N2 vs. N03.643 (1.516–8.756)0.0040
  N3 vs. N05.779 (2.387–13.990)0.0001
Lymphatic invasion
  Yes vs. no2.115 (1.188–3.766)0.0110

Discussion

In this study, claudin-4, MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression was examined in 189 cases of gastric cancer, and was associated with patient clinicopathologic factors. Claudin-4 expression was correlated with depth of wall invasion, lymph node metastasis and lymphatic invasion, and was significantly correlated with MMP-2 and -9 expression. These results are consistent with those obtained in a cancer cell model (35,37). Agarwal et al showed that claudin-4 expression in ovarian epithelial cells enhanced cell invasion and was associated with increased MMP-2 activity (35). Takehara et al also showed that the overexpression of claudin-4 in colonic cancer cells stimulated invasive activity and MMP-2 and -9 activity (37). Although it is generally believed that an alteration in claudin expression is involved in tumorigenesis, the role of claudin-4 in the regulation of cancer-related cell functions, such as invasion, remains unclear. It is known that claudins affect cell physiology by recruiting signal transduction-related molecules at tight junctions. Claudin-4 affects the expression and activity of MMP-2 and -9 either directly or by modulating signal transduction; consequently, these two proteins stimulate cell invasion.

Recent studies also indicate that the overexpression of claudins is correlated with tumor invasion. Wu et al demonstrated that the overexpression of claudin-1 was correlated with the invasiveness and metastasis of gastric cancer (41). Kinugasa et al revealed that the expression of claudin-1 and -2 was up-regulated in colorectal cancer, and that this up-regulation was correlated with the depth of tumor invasion (42). Dhawan et al showed that claudin-1 expression increased with the progression of colon carcinoma and metastasis (43). Nevertheless, some studies have shown that the down-regulation of claudins is correlated with tumor invasion. Ueda et al showed that decreased claudin-4 expression at the invasive front is correlated with cancer invasion and metastasis in colorectal cancer (44). Oshima et al showed that reduced expression of claudin-7 correlated with venous invasion and liver metastasis in colorectal cancer (45). Usami et al reported that reduced expression of claudin-7 at the invasive front of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma may lead to tumor progression and subsequent metastasis (46). Morohashi et al found that decreased expression of claudin-1 correlated with lymphatic node metastasis in breast cancer (47). These reports of decreased claudin protein expression in cancer are consistent with the generally accepted notion that tumorigenesis is accompanied by a disruption of the tight junctions, a process that may play a key role in the loss of cohesion and invasiveness observed in cancer cells.

In gastric cancer, MMP-2 and -9 are linked to tumor invasion and metastasis as well as to a poor prognosis (4850). Kabashima et al demonstrated a correlation between MMP-9 expression and lymphatic invasion and lymph node positivity in gastric carcinoma (51). The results of Kabashima et al are consistent with the results of the present study, which indicate that MMP-9, but not MMP-2 expression, is positively correlated with lymph node metastasis and lymphatic invasion as well as with a poor prognosis. By contrast, certain reports have shown MMP-2 expression to be associated with tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis and survival in gastric cancer (5254). Allgyer et al demonstrated an association between the immunohistochemical detection of MMP-2 and the prognosis of gastric cancer patients (52). Ji et al showed that the expression of MMP-2 mRNA was significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis and a poor prognosis in gastric cancer patients (53). Monig et al also found that the intensity of MMP-2 staining in tumor cells was significantly correlated with the depth of tumor infiltration, lymph node metastasis and distal metastasis in gastric cancer patients (54). Further studies are required to clearly distinguish the roles and involvement of MMP-2 and -9 in the metastasis of gastric cancer.

In conclusion, claudin-4 expression was correlated with the depth of wall invasion, lymph node metastasis and lymphatic invasion in gastric cancer. Further analysis showed that claudin-4 expression was significantly correlated with MMP-2 and -9 expression. We suggest that claudin-4 affects the expression and activity of MMP-2 and -9 either directly or by modulating signal transduction, and that these two proteins stimulate tumor cell invasion.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from the National Science Council (NSC 98-2314-B-238-001) and a grant from Vanung University, Taiwan (VIT-98-CM-01).

References

1. 

Tsukita S and Furuse M: Pores in the wall: claudins constitute tight junction strands containing aqueous pores. J Cell Biol. 149:13–16. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2. 

Tsukita S and Furuse M: Claudin-based barrier in simple and stratified cellular sheets. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 14:531–536. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3. 

Anderson JM: Molecular structure of tight junctions and their role in epithelial transport. News Physiol Sci. 16:126–130. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

4. 

Cereijido M, Valdes J, Shoshani L, et al: Role of tight junctions in establishing and maintaining cell polarity. Annu Rev Physiol. 60:161–177. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5. 

Tsukita S, Furuse M and Itoh M: Multifunctional strands in tight junctions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2:285–293. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6. 

Morita K, Furuse M, Fujimoto K, et al: Claudin multigene family encoding four-transmembrane domain protein components of tight junction strands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96:511–516. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7. 

Itoh M, Furuse M, Morita K, et al: Direct binding of three tight junction-associated MAGUKs, ZO-1, ZO-2 and ZO-3, with the COOH termini of claudins. J Cell Biol. 147:1351–1363. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8. 

Yamamoto Y, Nishimura N, Morimoto S, et al: Distinct roles of Rab3B and Rab13 in the polarized transport of apical, basolateral, and tight junctional membrane proteins to the plasma membrane. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 308:270–275. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar

9. 

Balda MS, Garrett MD and Matter K: The ZO-1-associated Y-box factor ZONAB regulates epithelial cell proliferation and cell density. J Cell Biol. 160:423–432. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10. 

Wu Y, Dowbenko D, Spencer S, et al: Interaction of the tumor suppressor PTEN/MMAC with a PDZ domain of MAGI3, a novel membrane-associated guanylate kinase. J Biol Chem. 275:21477–21485. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11. 

Mullin JM: Potential interplay between luminal growth factors and increased tight junction permeability in epithelial carcinogenesis. J Exp Zool. 279:484–489. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar

12. 

Soler AP, Miller RD, Laughlin KV, et al: Increased tight junctional permeability is associated with the development of colon cancer. Carcinogenesis. 20:1425–1431. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13. 

Resnick MB, Gavilanez M, Newton E, et al: Claudin expression in gastric adenocarcinomas: a tissue microarray study with prognostic correlation. Hum Pathol. 36:886–892. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar

14. 

Wu CM, Lee YS, Wang TH, et al: Identification of differential gene expression between intestinal and diffuse gastric cancer using cDNA microarray. Oncol Rep. 15:57–64. 2006.PubMed/NCBI

15. 

Kuo WL, Lee LY, Wu CM, et al: Differential expression of claudin-4 between intestinal and diffuse-type gastric cancer. Oncol Rep. 16:729–734. 2006.PubMed/NCBI

16. 

Song X, Chen H, Shen B, et al: Expression of Cdx2 and claudin-2 in the multistage tissue of gastric carcinogenesis. Oncology. 73:357–365. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17. 

Song X, Li X, Tang Y, et al: Expression of claudin-2 in the multistage process of gastric carcinogenesis. Histol Histopathol. 23:673–682. 2008.PubMed/NCBI

18. 

Long H, Crean CD, Lee WH, et al: Expression of Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin receptors claudin-3 and claudin-4 in prostate cancer epithelium. Cancer Res. 61:7878–7881. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

19. 

Santin AD, Zhan F, Cane S, et al: Gene expression fingerprint of uterine serous papillary carcinoma: identification of novel molecular markers for uterine serous cancer diagnosis and therapy. Br J Cancer. 92:1561–1573. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar

20. 

Nichols LS, Ashfaq R and Iacobuzio-Donahue CA: Claudin 4 protein expression in primary and metastatic pancreatic cancer: support for use as a therapeutic target. Am J Clin Pathol. 121:226–230. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21. 

Al Moustafa AE, Alaoui-Jamali MA, Batist G, et al: Identification of genes associated with head and neck carcinogenesis by cDNA microarray comparison between matched primary normal epithelial and squamous carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 21:2634–2640. 2002.

22. 

Kominsky SL, Argani P, Korz D, et al: Loss of the tight junction protein claudin-7 correlates with histological grade in both ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Oncogene. 22:2021–2033. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23. 

Kominsky SL, Vali M, Korz D, et al: Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin elicits rapid and specific cytolysis of breast carcinoma cells mediated through tight junction proteins claudin 3 and 4. Am J Pathol. 164:1627–1633. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar

24. 

Morson BC, Dawson IMP and Day DW: Morson and Dawson's Gastrointestinal Pathology. 3rd edition. Blackwell Science; Oxford: pp. 53–70. 1990

25. 

Hart IR and Saini A: Biology of tumour metastasis. Lancet. 339:1453–1457. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26. 

Kohn EC and Liotta LA: Molecular insights into cancer invasion: strategies for prevention and intervention. Cancer Res. 55:1856–1862. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

27. 

Murphy G and Docherty AJ: The matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 7:120–125. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28. 

Stetler-Stevenson WG, Liotta LA and Kleiner DE: Extracellular matrix 6: role of matrix metalloproteinases in tumor invasion and metastasis. FASEB J. 7:1434–1441. 1993.PubMed/NCBI

29. 

Davies B, Waxman J, Wasan H, et al: Levels of matrix metalloproteases in bladder cancer correlate with tumor grade and invasion. Cancer Res. 53:5365–5369. 1993.PubMed/NCBI

30. 

Boag AH and Young ID: Increased expression of the 72-kd type IV collagenase in prostatic adenocarcinoma. Demonstration by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. Am J Pathol. 144:585–591. 1994.PubMed/NCBI

31. 

Muller D, Wolf C, Abecassis J, et al: Increased stromelysin 3 gene expression is associated with increased local invasiveness in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer Res. 53:165–169. 1993.PubMed/NCBI

32. 

Urbanski SJ, Edwards DR, Hershfield N, et al: Expression pattern of metalloproteinases and their inhibitors changes with the progression of human sporadic colorectal neoplasia. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2:81–89. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33. 

Sakurai Y, Otani Y, Kameyama K, et al: Expression of interstitial collagenase (matrix metalloproteinase-1) in gastric cancers. Jap J Cancer Res. 88:401–406. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34. 

Torii A, Kodera Y, Uesaka K, et al: Plasma concentration of matrix metalloproteinase 9 in gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 84:133–136. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35. 

Agarwal R, D'Souza T and Morin PJ: Claudin-3 and claudin-4 expression in ovarian epithelial cells enhances invasion and is associated with increased matrix metalloproteinase-2 activity. Cancer Res. 65:7378–7385. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36. 

Oku N, Sasabe E, Ueta E, et al: Tight junction protein claudin-1 enhances the invasive activity of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells by promoting cleavage of laminin-5 gamma2 chain via matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and membrane-type MMP-1. Cancer Res. 66:5251–5257. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

37. 

Takehara M, Nishimura T, Mima S, et al: Effect of claudin expression on paracellular permeability, migration and invasion of colonic cancer cells. Biol Pharm Bull. 32:825–831. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38. 

Schraml P, Bucher C, Bissig H, et al: Cyclin E overexpression and amplification in human tumours. J Pathol. 200:375–382. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39. 

Ravn V, Havsteen H and Thorpe SM: Immunohistochemical evaluation of estrogen and progesterone receptors in paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed endometrial tissues: comparison with enzyme immunoassay and immunohistochemical analysis of frozen tissue. Mod Pathol. 11:709–715. 1998.

40. 

Ravn V, Rasmussen BB and Hojholt L: Reproducibility of subjective immunohistochemical estrogen- and progesterone-receptor determination in human endometrium. Pathol Res Pract. 189:1015–1022. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41. 

Wu YL, Zhang S, Wang GR, et al: Expression transformation of claudin-1 in the process of gastric adenocarcinoma invasion. World J Gastroenterol. 14:4943–4948. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42. 

Kinugasa T, Huo Q, Higashi D, et al: Selective up-regulation of claudin-1 and claudin-2 in colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res. 27:3729–3734. 2007.PubMed/NCBI

43. 

Dhawan P, Singh AB, Deane NG, et al: Claudin-1 regulates cellular transformation and metastatic behavior in colon cancer. J Clin Invest. 115:1765–1776. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44. 

Ueda J, Semba S, Chiba H, et al: Heterogeneous expression of claudin-4 in human colorectal cancer: decreased claudin-4 expression at the invasive front correlates cancer invasion and metastasis. Pathobiology. 74:32–41. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45. 

Oshima T, Kunisaki C, Yoshihara K, et al: Reduced expression of the claudin-7 gene correlates with venous invasion and liver metastasis in colorectal cancer. Oncol Rep. 19:953–959. 2008.PubMed/NCBI

46. 

Usami Y, Chiba H, Nakayama F, et al: Reduced expression of claudin-7 correlats with invasion and metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Hum Pathol. 37:569–577. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47. 

Morohashi S, Kusumi T, Sato F, et al: Decreased expression of claudin-1 correlates with recurrence status in breast cancer. Int J Mol Med. 20:139–143. 2007.PubMed/NCBI

48. 

Grigioni WF, D'Errico A, Fortunato C, et al: Prognosis of gastric carcinoma revealed by interactions between tumor cells and basement membrane. Mod Pathol. 7:220–225. 1994.PubMed/NCBI

49. 

Tori A, Kodera Y, Ito M, et al: Matrix metalloproteinase 9 in mucosally invasive gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 1:142–145. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50. 

Schwartz GK: Invasion and metastasis in gastric cancer: in vitro and in vivo models with clinical correlations. Semin Oncol. 23:316–324. 1996.PubMed/NCBI

51. 

Kabashima A, Maehare Y, Kakeji Y, et al: Clinicopathological features and overexpression of matrix metalloproteinases in intramucosal gastric carcinoma with lymph node metastasis. Clin Cancer Res. 6:3581–3584. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

52. 

Allgayer H, Babic R, Beyer BC, et al: Prognostic relevance of MMP-2 (72-kDa collagenase IV) in gastric cancer. Oncology. 55:152–160. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53. 

Ji F, Chen YL, Jin EY, et al: Relationship between matrix metalloproteinase-2 mRNA expression and clinicopathological and urokinase-type plasminogen activator system parameters and prognosis in human gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 11:3222–3226. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar

54. 

Monig SP, Baldus SE, Hennecken JK, et al: Expression of MMP-2 is associated with progression and lymph node metastasis of gastric carcinoma. Histopathology. 39:597–602. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

September-October 2010
Volume 1 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Hwang T, Lee L, Wang C, Liang Y, Huang S and Wu C: Claudin-4 expression is associated with tumor invasion, MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression in gastric cancer. Exp Ther Med 1: 789-797, 2010
APA
Hwang, T., Lee, L., Wang, C., Liang, Y., Huang, S., & Wu, C. (2010). Claudin-4 expression is associated with tumor invasion, MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression in gastric cancer. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 1, 789-797. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2010.116
MLA
Hwang, T., Lee, L., Wang, C., Liang, Y., Huang, S., Wu, C."Claudin-4 expression is associated with tumor invasion, MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression in gastric cancer". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 1.5 (2010): 789-797.
Chicago
Hwang, T., Lee, L., Wang, C., Liang, Y., Huang, S., Wu, C."Claudin-4 expression is associated with tumor invasion, MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression in gastric cancer". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 1, no. 5 (2010): 789-797. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2010.116