|
1
|
Ellington JK, Harris M, Webb L, et al:
Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus. A mechanism for the
indolence of osteomyelitis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 85:918–921.
2003.
|
|
2
|
Wright JA and Nair SP: Interaction of
staphylococci with bone. Int J Med Microbiol. 300:193–204. 2010.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Ellington JK, Harris M, Hudson MC, Vishin
S, Webb LX and Sherertz R: Intracellular Staphylococcus
aureus and antibiotic resistance: implications for treatment of
staphylococcal osteomyelitis. J Orthop Res. 24:87–93.
2006.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Ning R, Zhang X, Guo X and Li Q:
Attachment of Staphylococcus aureus is required for
activation of nuclear factor kappa B in human osteoblasts. Acta
Biochim Biophys Sin. 42:883–892. 2010.
|
|
5
|
Chihara S and Segreti J: Osteomyelitis.
Disease-a-Month. 56:6–31. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Ishida I, Kohda C, Yanagawa Y, Miyaoka H
and Shimamura T: Epigallocatechin gallate suppresses expression of
receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL) in Staphylococcus
aureus infection in osteoblast-like NRG cells. J Med Microbiol.
56:1042–1046. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Jin C and Flavell RA: Molecular mechanism
of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. J Clin Immunol. 30:628–631. 2010.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Chauhan VS and Marriott I: Differential
roles for NOD2 in osteoblast inflammatory immune responses to
bacterial pathogens of bone tissue. J Med Microbiol. 59:755–762.
2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Webb LX, Wagner W, Carroll D, Tyler H,
Coldren F and Martin E: Osteomyelitis and intraosteoblastic
Staphylococcus aureus. J Surg Orthop Adv. 16:73–78.
2007.
|
|
10
|
Reilly SS: In vivo internalization of
Staphylococcus aureus by embryonic chick osteoblasts. Bone.
26:63–70. 2000.
|
|
11
|
Shi S and Zhang X: Interaction of
Staphylococcus aureus with osteoblasts (Review). Exp Ther
Med. 3:367–370. 2012.
|
|
12
|
Lefebvre M, Jacqueline C, Amador G, et al:
Efficacy of daptomycin combined with rifampicin for the treatment
of experimental meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
(MRSA) acute osteomyelitis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 36:542–544.
2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Khanlari B, Elzi L, Estermann L, et al: A
rifampicin-containing antibiotic treatment improves outcome of
staphylococcal deep sternal wound infections. J Antimicrob
Chemother. 65:1799–1806. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
14
|
Garrigos C, Murillo O, Euba G, et al:
Efficacy of usual and high doses of daptomycin in combination with
rifampin versus alternative therapies in experimental foreign-body
infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 54:5251–5256. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
El Helou OC, Berbari EF, Lahr BD, et al:
Efficacy and safety of rifampin containing regimen for
staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement
and retention. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 29:961–967.
2010.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Rediske AM, Hymas WC, Wilkinson R and Pitt
WG: Ultrasonic enhancement of antibiotic action on several species
of bacteria. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 44:283–288. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Carmen JC, Roeder BL, Nelson JL, et al:
Ultrasonically enhanced vancomycin activity against
Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms in vivo. J Biomater
Appl. 18:237–245. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Carmen JC, Nelson JL, Beckstead BL, et al:
Ultrasonic-enhanced gentamicin transport through colony biofilms of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli. J Infect
Chemother. 10:193–199. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Runyan CM, Carmen JC, Beckstead BL, Nelson
JL, Robison RA and Pitt WG: Low-frequency ultrasound increases
outer membrane permeability of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Gen
Appl Microbiol. 25:295–301. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Wang L, Wang ZH, Shen CY, You ML, Xiao JF
and Chen GQ: Differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem
cells grown in terpolyesters of 3-hydroxyalkanoates scaffolds into
nerve cells. Biomaterials. 31:1691–1698. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Williams RG and Pitt WG: In vitro response
of Escherichia coli to antibiotics and ultrasound at various
insonation intensities. J Biomater Appl. 12:20–30. 1997.
|
|
22
|
Rediske AM, Roeder BL, Brown MK, et al:
Ultrasonic enhancement of antibiotic action on Escherichia
coli biofilms: an in vivo model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
43:1211–1214. 1999.
|
|
23
|
Carmen JC, Roeder BL, Nelson JL, et al:
Treatment of biofilm infections on implants with low-frequency
ultrasound and antibiotics. Am J Infect Control. 33:78–82. 2005.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Rapoport N, Smirnov AI, Timoshin A, Pratt
AM and Pitt WG: Factors affecting the permeability of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa cell walls toward lipophilic
compounds: effects of ultrasound and cell age. Arch Biochem
Biophys. 344:114–124. 1997.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Rediske AM, Rapoport N and Pitt WG:
Reducing bacterial resistance to antibiotics with ultrasound. Lett
Appl Microbiol. 28:81–84. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
26
|
Mitragotri S, Blankschtein D and Langer R:
Transdermal drug delivery using low-frequency sonophoresis. Pharm
Res. 13:411–420. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
27
|
Wyber JA, Andrews J and D’Emanuele A: The
use of sonication for the efficient delivery of plasmid DNA into
cells. Pharm Res. 14:750–756. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
28
|
Tachibana K, Uchida T, Tamura K, Eguchi H,
Yamashita N and Ogawa K: Enhanced cytotoxic effect of Ara-C by low
intensity ultrasound to HL-60 cells. Cancer Lett. 149:189–194.
2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
29
|
Li YS, Reid CN and McHale AP: Enhancing
ultrasound-mediated cell membrane permeabilisation (sonoporation)
using a high frequency pulse regime and implications for
ultrasound-aided cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Lett. 266:156–162.
2008. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
30
|
Iwanaga K, Tominaga K, Yamamoto K, et al:
Local delivery system of cytotoxic agents to tumors by focused
sonoporation. Cancer Gene Ther. 14:354–363. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
31
|
Kinoshita M and Hynynen K: Key factors
that affect sonoporation efficiency in in vitro settings: the
importance of standing wave in sonoporation. Biochem Biophys Res
Commun. 359:860–865. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
32
|
Mehier-Humbert S, Bettinger T, Yan F and
Guy RH: Plasma membrane poration induced by ultrasound exposure:
implication for drug delivery. J Control Release. 104:213–222.
2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
33
|
Qian Z, Sagers RD and Pitt WG:
Investigation of the mechanism of the bioacoustic effect. J Biomed
Mater Res. 44:198–205. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
34
|
Liu J, Lewis TN and Prausnitz MR:
Non-invasive assessment and control of ultrasound-mediated membrane
permeabilization. Pharm Res. 15:918–924. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
35
|
Ananta E, Voigt D, Zenker M, Heinz V and
Knorr D: Cellular injuries upon exposure of Escherichia coli
and Lactobacillus rhamnosus to high-intensity ultrasound. J
Appl Microbiol. 99:271–278. 2005.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
36
|
Saito K, Miyake K, McNeil PL, Kato K, Yago
K and Sugai N: Plasma membrane disruption underlies injury of the
corneal endothelium by ultrasound. Exp Eye Res. 68:431–437. 1999.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
37
|
Guzman HR, McNamara AJ, Nguyen DX and
Prausnitz MR: Bioeffects caused by changes in acoustic cavitation
bubble density and cell concentration: a unified explanation based
on cell-to-bubble ratio and blast radius. Ultrasound Med Biol.
29:1211–1222. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
38
|
Pitt WG and Ross SA: Ultrasound increases
the rate of bacterial cell growth. Biotechnol Prog. 19:1038–1044.
2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
39
|
Gracewski SM, Miao H and Dalecki D:
Ultrasonic excitation of a bubble near a rigid or deformable
sphere: implications for ultrasonically induced hemolysis. J Acoust
Soc Am. 117:1440–1447. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
40
|
Huber PE and Pfisterer P: In vitro and in
vivo transfection of plasmid DNA in the Dunning prostate tumor
R3327-AT1 is enhanced by focused ultrasound. Gene Ther.
7:1516–1525. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
41
|
Chang DC: Structure and dynamics of
electric field-induced membrane pores as revealed by rapid-freezing
electron microscopy. Guide to Electroporation and Electrofusion.
Academic Press, Inc; San Diego: pp. 9–27. 1992
|
|
42
|
Lee EK, Gallagher RJ, Campbell AM and
Prausnitz MR: Prediction of ultrasound-mediated disruption of cell
membranes using machine learning techniques and statistical
analysis of acoustic spectra. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 51:82–89.
2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
43
|
Guzman HR, Nguyen DX, Khan S and Prausnitz
MR: Ultrasound-mediated disruption of cell membranes. II.
Heterogeneous effects on cells. J Acoust Soc Am. 110:597–606. 2001.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
44
|
Guzman HR, Nguyen DX, Khan S and Prausnitz
MR: Ultrasound-mediated disruption of cell membranes. I.
Quantification of molecular uptake and cell viability. J Acoust Soc
Am. 110:588–596. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
