|
1
|
Hamilton DW and Brunette DM: The effect of
substratum topography on osteoblast adhesion mediated signal
transduction and phosphorylation. Biomaterials. 28:1806–1819. 2007.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Chen J, Ulerich JP, Abelev E, Fasasi A, et
al: An investigation of the initial attachment and orientation of
osteoblast-like cells on laser grooved Ti-6Al-4V surfaces. Mat Sci
Eng C. 29:1442–1452. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
von Wilmowsky C, Bauer S, Lutz R, Meisel
M, et al: In vivo evaluation of anodic TiO2 nanotubes:
an experimental study in the pig. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl
Biomater. 89:165–171. 2009.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Aita H, Hori N, Takeuchi M, Suzuki T, et
al: The effect of ultraviolet functionalization of titanium on
integration with bone. Biomaterials. 30:1015–1025. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Advincula MC, Rahemtulla FG, Advincula RC,
Ada ET, et al: Osteoblast adhesion and matrix mineralization on
sol-gel-derived titanium oxide. Biomaterials. 27:2201–2212. 2006.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Bracci B, Torricelli P, Panzavolta S,
Boanini E, et al: Effect of Mg2+, Sr2+, and
Mn2+ on the chemico-physical and in vitro biological
properties of calcium phosphate biomimetic coatings. J Inorg
Biochem. 103:1666–1674. 2009.
|
|
7
|
Park JW, Kim YJ and Jang JH: Surface
characteristics and in vitro biocompatibility of a
manganese-containing titanium oxide surface. Appl Surf Sci.
258:977–985. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
Li Y, Widodo J, Lim S and Ooi CP:
Synthesis and cytocompatibility of manganese (II) and iron (III)
substituted hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. J Mater Sci. 47:754–763.
2012. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
9
|
Paluszkiewicz C, Œlósarczyk A, Pijocha D,
Sitarz M, et al: Synthesis, structural properties and thermal
stability of Mn-doped hydroxyapatite. J Mol Struct. 976:301–309.
2010. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
10
|
Dormond O, Ponsonnet L, Hasmim M, Foletti
A and Rüegg C: Manganese-induced integrin affinity maturation
promotes recruitment of alpha V beta 3 integrin to focal adhesions
in endothelial cells: evidence for a role of phosphatidylinositol
3-kinase and Src. Thromb Haemost. 92:151–161. 2004.
|
|
11
|
Legler DF, Wiedle G, Ross FP and Imhof BA:
Superactivation of integrin αvβ3 by low antagonist concentrations.
J Cell Sci. 114:1545–1553. 2001.
|
|
12
|
Lüthen F, Lange R, Becker P, Rychly J, et
al: The influence of surface roughness of titanium on beta1- and
beta3-integrin adhesion and the organization of fibronectin in
human osteoblastic cells. Biomaterials. 26:2423–2440.
2005.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Lüthen F, Bulnheim U, Müller PD, Rychly J,
et al: Influence of manganese ions on cellular behavior of human
osteoblasts in vitro. Biomol Eng. 24:531–536. 2007.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
Zreiqat H, Howlett CR, Zannettino A, Evans
P, et al: Mechanisms of magnesium-stimulated adhesion of
osteoblastic cells to commonly used orthopaedic implants. J Biomed
Mater Res. 62:175–184. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
15
|
Hu H, Zhang W, Qiao Y, Jiang X, et al:
Antibacterial activity and increased bone marrow stem cell
functions of Zn-incorporated TiO2 coatings on titanium.
Acta Biomater. 8:904–915. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Li Y, Lee IS, Cui FZ and Choi SH: The
biocompatibility of nanostructured calcium phosphate coated on
micro-arc oxidized titanium. Biomaterials. 29:2025–2032. 2008.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Han Y, Chen DH, Sun J, Zhang Y and Xu K:
UV-enhanced bioactivity and cell response of micro-arc oxidized
titania coatings. Acta Biomater. 4:1518–1529. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Sul YT, Johansson C, Byon E and
Albrektsson T: The bone response of oxidized bioactive and
non-bioactive titanium implants. Biomaterials. 26:6720–6730. 2005.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Lee JM, Lee JI and Lim YJ: In vitro
investigation of anodization and CaP deposited titanium surface
using MG63 osteoblast-like cells. Appl Surf Sci. 256:3086–3092.
2010. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
20
|
Wei D, Zhou Y and Yang C: Characteristic,
cell response and apatite-induction ability of microarc oxidized
TiO2-based coating containing P on Ti6Al4V before and
after chemical-treatment and dehydration. Ceram Int. 35:2545–2554.
2009. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
21
|
Anselme K: Osteoblast adhesion on
biomaterials. Biomaterials. 21:667–681. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
22
|
Silva GA, Coutinho OP, Ducheyne P, Shapiro
IM and Reis RL: The effect of starch and starch-bioactive glass
composite microparticles on the adhesion and expression of the
osteoblastic phenotype of a bone cell line. Biomaterials.
28:326–334. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Kennedy SB, Washburn NR, Simon CG Jr and
Amis EJ: Combinatorial screen of the effect of surface energy on
fibronectin-mediated osteoblast adhesion, spreading and
proliferation. Biomaterials. 27:3817–3824. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Kang IC, Kim TS, Ko KK, Song HY, et al:
Microstructure and osteoblast adhesion of continuously porous
Al2O3 body fabricated by fibrous monolithic
process. Mater Lett. 59:69–73. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
25
|
Linez-Bataillon P, Monchau F, Bigerelle M
and Hildebrand HF: In vitro MC3T3 osteoblast adhesion with respect
to surface roughness of Ti6Al4V substrates. Biomol Eng. 19:133–141.
2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
26
|
Zinger O, Anselme K, Denzer A, Habersetzer
P, et al: Time-dependent morphology and adhesion of osteoblastic
cells on titanium model surfaces featuring scale-resolved
topography. Biomaterials. 25:2695–2711. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
27
|
Bacakova L, Grausova L, Vacik J, Fraczek
A, et al: Improved adhesion and growth of human osteoblast-like MG
63 cells on biomaterials modified with carbon nanoparticles. Diam
Relat Mater. 16:2133–2140. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
28
|
Rodil SE, Ramírez C, Olivares R, Arzate H,
et al: Osteoblasts attachment on amorphous carbon films. Diam Relat
Mater. 15:1300–1309. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
29
|
Huang HH, Ho CT, Lee TH, Lee TL, et al:
Effect of surface roughness of ground titanium on initial cell
adhesion. Biomol Eng. 21:93–97. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
30
|
Dalby MJ, Kayser MV, Bonfield W and Di
Silvio L: Initial attachment of osteoblasts to an optimised HAPEX
topography. Biomaterials. 23:681–690. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
31
|
Finke B, Luethen F, Schroeder K, Mueller
PD, et al: The effect of positively charged plasma polymerization
on initial osteoblastic focal adhesion on titanium surfaces.
Biomaterials. 28:4521–4534. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
32
|
Tang ZG and Hunt JA: The effect of PLGA
doping of polycaprolactone films on the control of osteoblast
adhesion and proliferation in vitro. Biomaterials. 27:4409–4418.
2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
33
|
Hillberg AL, Holmes CA and Tabrizian M:
Effect of genipin cross-linking on the cellular adhesion properties
of layer-by-layer assembled polyelectrolyte films. Biomaterials.
30:4463–4470. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
34
|
Pallu S, Bourget C, Bareille R, Labrugère
C, et al: The effect of cyclo-DfKRG peptide immobilization on
titanium on the adhesion and differentiation of human
osteoprogenitor cells. Biomaterials. 26:6932–6940. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
35
|
Feng B, Weng J, Yang BC, Qu SX and Zhang
XD: Characterization of titanium surfaces with calcium and
phosphate and osteoblast adhesion. Biomaterials. 25:3421–3428.
2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
36
|
Xue WC, Krishna BV, Bandyopadhyay A and
Bose S: Processing and biocompatibility evaluation of laser
processed porous titanium. Acta Biomater. 3:1007–1018. 2007.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
37
|
Yun KD, Yang YZ, Lim HP, Oh GJ, et al:
Effect of nanotubular-micro-roughened titanium surface on cell
response in vitro and osseointegration in vivo. Mat Sci Eng C.
30:27–33. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
38
|
Randeniya LK, Bendavid A, Martin PJ, Amin
MS, et al: Thin-film nanocomposites of diamond-like carbon and
titanium oxide; Osteoblast adhesion and surface properties. Diam
Relat Mater. 19:329–335. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
39
|
Liu XM, Lim JY, Donahue HJ, Dhurjati R, et
al: Influence of substratum surface chemistry/energy and topography
on the human fetal osteoblastic cell line hFOB 1.19: Phenotypic and
genotypic responses observed in vitro. Biomaterials. 28:4535–4550.
2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
40
|
Rouahi M, Champion E, Hardouin P and
Anselme K: Quantitative kinetic analysis of gene expression during
human osteoblastic adhesion on orthopaedic materials. Biomaterials.
27:2829–2844. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
41
|
Rubin J, Rubin C and Jacobs CR: Molecular
pathways mediating mechanical signaling in bone. Gene. 367:1–16.
2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
42
|
Siebers MC, ter Brugge PJ, Walboomers XF
and Jansen JA: Integrins as linker proteins between osteoblasts and
bone replacing materials. A critical review. Biomaterials.
26:137–146. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
43
|
Wilson CJ, Clegg RE, Leavesley DI and
Pearcy MJ: Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed
proteins: a review. Tissue Eng. 11:1–18. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
44
|
Prasadam I, Friis T, Shi W, van Gennip S,
et al: Osteoarthritic cartilage chondrocytes alter subchondral bone
osteoblast differentiation via MAPK signalling pathway involving
ERK1/2. Bone. 46:226–235. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
