Elevated pre‑treatment levels of high sensitivity C‑reactive protein as a potential prognosticator in patients with colorectal cancer

  • Authors:
    • Maosong Lin
    • Junxing Huang
    • Jiayi Zhu
    • Hongzhang Shen
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: October 16, 2013     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1350
  • Pages: 1369-1374
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Elevated levels of C‑reactive protein (CRP) have been described as a prognostic factor in various types of human malignancy. In the present study, the prognostic potency of CRP was validated for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) in order to guide patient management and define high‑risk populations for follow‑up or for therapeutic purposes. The association between the high sensitivity‑CRP (hs‑CRP) levels of a total of 123 patients with CRC and their clinicopathological characteristics was explored. Subsequently, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the survival impact of pre‑treatment hs‑CRP levels in this cohort study. Statistically significant correlations between the serum levels of hs‑CRP and lymph node and distant metastasis (P<0.001 and P=0.012, respectively), vascular and perineural invasion (P<0.001 and P<0.001), grades (P=0.022) and clinical stages (P=0.001), but not age and gender (P=0.616 and 0.676, respectively), were found. The five‑year survival rate of patients with elevated (>5.0 mg/l) hs‑CRP levels was demonstrated to be significantly less than that of those in the normal group (≤5.0 mg/l) by applying the Kaplan‑Meier method (13.3 versus 57.0%, log‑rank test P<0.001). Furthermore, following identification as a prognostic factor through using univariate analysis, high levels of hs‑CRP (P<0.001) were validated as an independent prognosticator in CRC in the present study through using multivariate analysis. Pre‑treatment serum CRP levels were associated with advanced and progressed CRC patients, therefore these levels may serve as a potential prognostic marker for CRC patients.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of malignant tumor in Western countries, with an estimated total of 143,000 cases in the United States in 2010 (1). At present, against the declining trend of incidence of gastric cancer, the prevalence of CRC has maintained an upward momentum in China, which is partly attributable to acquiring the Western lifestyle. With the development of the algorithm of surgery and pan-operation systemic therapies, particularly chemotherapy and certain targeted therapies, the overall prognosis of patients has improved. However, certain patients, either in the curative setting or the metastatic one, with relatively similar clinical features may have varied clinical courses and their prognoses are difficult to predict. The underlying mechanisms of this phenomenon remain largely unknown. Therefore, prognostic markers are required in order to help stratify patients according to their risk, enable follow-up schedules to be individualised and tailor eligibility criteria for trials of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies. Tumor stage, pathological grade, lymph node involvement and lymphovascular invasion are commonly used as known prognostic factors in the clinic (24). However, all of these are postoperative factors. In addition, though certain abnormal tumor-associated genetic molecules were identified as being able to predict the prognosis of the patients (5,6), their measurement is to a certain extent time-consuming and complex and frequently not integrated into clinical practice. Therefore, identifying pre-treatment prognostic factors, including a number of serum biomarkers, would offer the opportunity for more objective and reproducible measurement and risk stratification prior to surgery. Thus, due to the characteristics of simplicity, cost-effectiveness and availablility in daily practice and the association with cancers, the measurement of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels has gained increasing attention.

CRP, a typical systemic inflammation marker, was first discovered in the plasma of patients during the acute phase of pneumococal pneumonia (7). It is produced almost exclusively in hepatocytes in response to inflammatory cytokines, such as intereukin (IL)-1, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and, in particular, IL-6, within a few hours following insults such as infection, trauma or cardiovascular diseases (8,9). In recent decades, mounting evidence has demonstrated that elevated CRP levels were associated with an increased risk of malignancy (1013). Moreover, elevated levels of CRP have been described as a prognostic factor in various types of human malignancy, including ovarian, and gastroesophageal (1417). However, the correlation between CRP levels and prognosis in patients with CRC remains to be clarified (18,19).

To the best of our knowledge, few systematic studies focusing on the clinical significance of CRP in Chinese CRC patients have been reported. Therefore, in the present study, the potential clinical and prognostic significance of pre-treatment high sensitivity-CRP (hs-CRP) levels in Chinese patients with CRC of all stages and histological subtypes has been comprehensively analyzed.

Patients and methods

Patients

From 2005 to 2008, a total of 150 CRC patients were initially enrolled in the present study, including a number of cases from a previous retrospective study that investigated the clinical significance of platelet count in CRC (20). Patients underwent either en bloc colorectomy or palliative resection, and further chemotherapy in the inoperable patients was studied retrospectively. None of the patients had received preoperative chemotherapy. The histological tumor subtype was determined according to the 1997 UICC classification and staging was based on the 2002 TNM classification. Patients with active concurrent infection or who took non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were excluded from the present study. Patients were also excluded if their pre-treatment CRP levels were unavailable. Information on patient and tumor characteristics, such as age, gender, stage, presence of regional lymph node or distant metastases, histological grade and CRP value, was obtained from the databases of Taizhou People’s Hopital (Taizhou, China). Only 123 patients (70 males and 53 females met the required inclusion criteria). Follow-up information, including the cause of mortality, was ascertained through a review of clinical notes and direct or family contact.

The Ethics Committee of Taizhou People’s Hospital approved the study. Written informed consent was obtained from all of the patients according to the guidelines approved by the Institutional Research Board of the hospital.

Assay of serum CRP

A sample of the peripheral venous blood of patients was withdrawn one day prior to treatment. The blood samples were temporarily stored at 4°C. Immediately after the blood was centrifuged, serum samples or the supernatant were frozen and stored at −80°C until use. Pre-treatment hs-CRP values were measured as part of the clinical routine using a BN ProSpec system (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Normal serum levels were defined as ≥5 mg/l by the manufacturer’s instructions. When investigating the correlation between the levels of hs-CRP with clinicopathological characteristics, the pre-treatment hs-CRP values were classified into the CRP ≥5 mg/l and >5 mg/l groups, according to the suggestion of Saito et al(21)and Stein et al(22).

Statistical analysis

Comparisons between the two groups, the high levels of the hs-CRP and normal levels groups, were performed using the t-test for quantitative variables, the χ2 test for categorical clinical variables, and the Fisher’s exact test when appropriate. Overall survival was measured from the date of diagnosis until the date the patient succumbed due to disease or of the final follow-up. Survival curves were obtained according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparison of the survival curves was carried out using the log-rank test. Variables that were significant at P<0.05 in the univariate analysis were also included in the multivariate analysis. Multivariate survival analysis of the group variables was performed using the Cox proportional hazard model. Mortalities up to the end of May 2013 were included in the analysis. To remove a variable from the model, the corresponding P-value had to be >0.10. Analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and two-tailed values of P<0.05 were accepted as indicating a statistically significant difference.

Results

Patient characteristics

In total, 123 patients with CRC in this cohort (70 male and 53 female) met the inclusion criteria. The details of the baseline clinicopathological parameters of the patients studied are listed in Table I. The mean age of the group whose hs-CRP levels were >5 mg/l was 62.07±12.51 years, while that of the normal group was 60.85±11.21 years, which did not manifest a significant difference (P=0.616). A minor dominance of male cases (n=70) was observed compared with their female counterparts (n=53) overall, but no significant difference of gender distribution was identified between the two groups. In addition, most of the patients were classified as stage III, followed by stage II, according to the TNM classification, and only five patients with stage IV and two with stage I were included in this cohort study. In total, 56 patients, 25 in the hs-CRP >5 mg/l group and 31 in the hs-CRP <5 mg/l group, exhibited regional lymph node involvement. However, significantly more cases of lymph node-negative patients were identified in the hs-CRP levels group compared with the normal group (P<0.001). Partly attributable to the surgical indication, there were only five patients with distance metastasis which had palliative resection performed on them in this cohort of cases, of which four cases had significantly elevated levels of hs-CRP.

Table I

Association between pretreatment hs-CRP levels and baseline clinicopathological variables in patients with CRC.

Table I

Association between pretreatment hs-CRP levels and baseline clinicopathological variables in patients with CRC.

Groups

Variables (n)hs-CRP ≥5 mg/lhs-CRP >5 mg/lP-value
Total no. of cases9330
Age (year; mean ± SD)60.85±11.2162.07±12.510.616
Gender
 Male54160.676
 Female3914
Lymph node invasion
 Positive3125<0.001
 Negative625
Distant metastasis
 Positive140.012
 Negative9226
Vascular invasion
 Positive815<0.001
 Negative8515
Perineural invasion
 Positive817<0.001
 Negative8513
Histological grade
 Low39170.022
 Moderate3713
 High170
TNM stage
 I200.001
 II241
 III6625
 IV14

[i] hs-CRP, high sensitivity-C reactive protein; CRC, colorectal cancer.

Clinicopathological significance of hs-CRP

The cut-off point for measurements of serum hs-CRP levels was set at 5.0 mg/l in the hospital, which is concurrent with previous studies (21,22). When the patients were divided into two groups according to the individual baseline levels of hs-CRP, 30 patients (24.39%) had pre-treatment serum hs-CRP levels above the defined cut-off point of 5 mg/l, ranging from 5.02 to 56.54 mg/l. Conversely, no serum elevation of hs-CRP levels was recognized in the 93 patients (75.61%) who were assigned into the normal group (Table I). A close association was observed between elevated hs-CRP levels (CRP>5.0 mg/l) and clinical lymph nodal status (P<0.001), distant metastasis (P=0.012), vascular and perineural invasion (P<0.001 and P<0.001), tumor differentiation (P=0.022) and clinical stage (P=0.001) (Table I).

The mean duration of follow-up for the survivors (n=57) was 35.5 months (range, 11–60 months). Overall, more patients in the high serum hs-CRP levels group had succumbed to disease (26/30) in comparison to their normal counterpart after five years of follow-up, of which 60 patients succumbed as a result of progression of the CRC, two due to surgical complications and four due to non-cancer causes (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 1, the five-year survival rates of the patients with high levels of hs-CRP and normal levels were 13.30 and 57.0%, respectively (P<0.001). Following the univariate analysis, along with the conventional prognostic factors such as lymph node and distant metastasis, vascular and perineural invasion, clinical stage and pathological grades, serum hs-CRP levels were also demonstrated to be correlated with the life span of the patients. Furthermore, considering results of the multivariate analysis, perineural invasion [hazard ratio (HR) 6.181, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.264–30.241, P=0.025], clinical stage (HR 6.86, 95% CI 2.045–23.01, P=0.002) and hs-CRP >5 mg/l (HR 5.196, 95% CI 2.901–9.309, P<0.001) were also identified as independent prognosticators in CRC in this study (Table II).

Table II

Univariate and multivariate analysis of the clinicopathological parameters in CRC.

Table II

Univariate and multivariate analysis of the clinicopathological parameters in CRC.

Overall survival

Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis


95.0% CI

VariablesP-valueHazard ratioLowerUpperP-value
Age0.621
Gender0.544
hs-CRP >5 mg/l<0.0015.1962.9019.309<0.001
Lymph node invasion<0.0011.5760.8752.8370.129
Distant metastasis<0.0011.1460.2235.8780.87
Vascular invasion<0.0010.5850.1262.7240.494
Perineural invasion<0.0016.1811.26430.2410.025
Histological grades0.0030.9720.631.4990.897
TNM stages<0.0016.862.04523.010.002

[i] CRC, colorectal cancer; CI, confidence interval; hs-CRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein.

Discussion

In 1863, Virchow identified leukocyte infiltration in neoplastic tissues and suggested these sites of chronic inflammation were the origin of cancer, which was the first suggestion of the linkage between inflammation and cancer (23). Since then, epidemiological links between Helicobacter pylori bacterial infection and gastric cancer and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, the so-called MALToma, as well as inflammatory bowel disease and CRC validated this hypothesis (24–26.). Notably, CRP, a systemic inflammation marker, was reintroduced as a tool for monitoring malignancies, similar to its use in cardiovascular diseases in recent decades (9,27,28). Furthermore, elevated levels of CRP have also been described as a prognostic factor in various types of human malignancy, including digestive system cancers (1416,29,30). The majority of the previous studies presumed that elevated serum CRP levels in patients with malignancy were probably a bodily response, secondary to tumor necrosis, local tissue damage and associated inflammation through the cytokines released from leukocytes infiltrating within the tumor microenvironment, in particular IL-6 (31).

To the best of our knowledge, several studies have explored the pathological role of CRP in CRC in the Western countries. Of the nine published retrospective studies up to 2011, three studies demonstrated positive associations between circulating CRP levels and CRC incidence (3234), while the remaining reports indicated generally null (3538) or even inverse (39,40) associations, which purported the discrepant conclusions presented. However, two individual meta-analyses which summarized data from 8 and 11 independent prospective investigations, respectively, concluded that CRP was a weak, positive risk factor for CRC (41,42). However, few studies are currently available with regard to this issue in Chinese CRC patients. Therefore, in the present study, the clinical significance of hs-CRP was first explored in CRC patients in the region. In the cohort of cases, 30 patients with high serum hs-CRP levels according to our cut-off line set as >5 mg/l were identified. At the same time, no significant association of the hs-CRP levels with regard to the age and gender of the patients was noted. However, it is encouraging that hs-CRP levels were notably increased in the cases with lymph node or distant metastasis and vascular or perineural invasion, all of which are traditional pathological prognostic factors. Elevated hs-CRP concentrations in serum were more common in the patients with advanced stage CRC. These results suggest the predictable potency of CRP in the mortality of CRC patients. Therefore, the results of the present study to a certain extent confirmed the conclusions of a number of previous studies which considered the positive pathological role of CRP in CRC (3234,43). Possible reasons for the difference between the previous studies which indicated a negative association between CRP levels and clinical and pathological features in CRC patients, and other previous positive studies including the present one are probably partly attributable to the variable potential biological features, different stages, distribution of the patient population and the disparate territory.

Conventional factors, such as pathological clinical stages and lymph node involvement, are the most important predictors of poor clinical outcome in clinical practice (4446). Furthermore, a number of less common serological and molecular markers have also shown prognostic evidence, such as the estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 in breast cancer and mismatch repair gene in stage II CRC (6,7). However, these markers are only available following surgery and their measurement is, to a certain extent, time-consuming and complex and therefore are often not integrated into clinical practice. By contrast, serum CRP levels, measurement of which is relatively inexpensive and easy to quantify in daily clinical practice, allows classification of patients who are at a relatively high risk and who are candidates for the latest intensive treatment. In the last 10 years, an increasing amount of evidence suggesting the CRP prognostic role in various types of tumors, including CRC, has been reported (47,48). Similarly, in the present study, whether CRP had a prognostic role in this cohort of patients was also investigated. Notably, following a further univariate analysis, concurrent with lymph node or distant metastasis, vascular or perineural invasion and clinical stage, elevated hs-CRP levels were identified as a prognostic marker in CRC. Patients with high serum levels of hs-CRP had relatively poorer five-year survival rates in comparison to their normal hs-CRP counterparts, suggesting that high concentrations of hs-CRP are a potential prognostic determinant. In addition, when included in the multivariate analysis, hs-CRP was also indicated as an independent prognostic factor in the cohort of cases. Together with perineural invasion, clinical stage was confirmed as another prognostic factor in the present study. However, although HR was manifested as >1, the prognostic significance of lymph node and distant metastasis were not indicated in this study, which was not in accordance with previous results (19,20). Relatively fewer patients with distance metastasis recruited in the present study may have contributed to the contrary result. Overall, the CRC patients with high levels of pretreatment CRP may demonstrate high risk potential, thus more attention should be given this issue in the consideration for more active therapies. Despite the significant results obtained in this study, it should be noted that this is a relatively small study in a single center and further verification in large cohorts in multiple centers in China is required.

To investigate the potency of CRP in CRC, it is essential to define CRP, i.e., a participant in the pathogenesis of CRC or simply a marker of CRC. However, the role of CRP in cancers, including CRC, remains poorly understood. Several mechanisms of increased CRP levels in malignant tumors are now known due to various therories. First, serum CRP levels may reflect the aggressiveness of the tumor, as they are the result of the immune response of the host to tumor growth (49,50). Second, tumor growth causes tissue inflammation in the tumor microenvironment by increasing the production of inflammatory proteins, particularly IL-6. Immune and inflammatory cells in the tumor microenvironment interact with malignant cells in a complicated manner and the net result of which is stimulation of tumor growth, invasion and metastasis (5153). As a result, the exact underlying role of CRP in various types of cancer including CRC requires more biological exploratory studies in the future.

In conclusion, the pre-treatment serum CRP levels may be a marker of aggressive characteristics of in Chinese CRC patients. Elevated CRP levels prior to initial treatment were demonstrated to be a poor prognostic factor for the overall survival of CRC patients in China. Due to its increased attractiveness as a routinely available, relatively inexpensive and objectively measured marker available pre-operatively, CRP may complement the prognostic value of traditional prognostic factors, such as stage and performance status, to more accurately stratify patients with CRC. However, the results of the present study should await internal or external validation in a number of centers and prospective exploratory studies prior to being used in clinical practice in China due to the limitations inherent to a retrospective study with a small sample size.

References

1 

American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures. 2010

2 

Corrado F, Mannini D, Ferri C, Corrado G, Bertoni F, Bacchini P, Lieber MM and Song JM: The prognostic significance of DNA ploidy pattern in transitional cell cancer of the renal pelvis and ureter: continuing follow-up. Eur Urol. 21(Suppl 1): 48–50. 1992.PubMed/NCBI

3 

Hall MC, Womack S, Sagalowsky AI, Carmody T, Erickstad MD and Roehrborn CG: Prognostic factors, recurrence, and survival in transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a 30-year experience in 252 patients. Urology. 52:594–601. 1998.PubMed/NCBI

4 

Kikuchi E, Horiguchi Y, Nakashima J, Hatakeyama N, Matsumoto M, Nishiyama T and Murai M: Lymphovascular invasion independently predicts increased disease specific survival in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. J Urol. 174:2120–2123. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Onitilo AA, Engel JM, Greenlee RT and Mukesh BN: Breast cancer subtypes based on ER/PR and Her2 expression: comparison of clinicopathologic features and survival. Clin Med Res. 7:4–13. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Hutchins G, Southward K, Handley K, Magill L, Beaumont C, Stahlschmidt J, Richman S, Chambers P, Seymour M, Kerr D, Gray R and Quirke P: Value of mismatch repair, KRAS, and BRAF mutations in predicting recurrence and benefits from chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 29:1261–1270. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Tillett WS and Francis T: Serological reaction in pneumonia with a non-protein somatic fraction of pnemoncoccus. J Exp Med. 52:561–571. 1930. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Castell JV, Gómez-Lechón MJ, David M, Fabra R, Trullenque R and Heinrich PC: Acute-phase response of human hepatocytes; regulation of acute-phase protein synthesis by interleukin-6. Hepatology. 12:1179–1186. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Zimmerman MA, Selzman CH, Cothren C, Sorensen AC, Raeburn CD and Harken AH: Diagnostic implications of C.reactive protein. Arch Surg. 138:220–224. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Nakamura T, Matsumine A, Matsubara T, Asanuma K, Uchida A and Sudo A: Clinical significance of pretreatment serum C-reactive protein level in soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer. 15:1055–1061. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Kim DK, Oh SY, Kwon HC, Lee S, Kwon KA, Kim BG, Kim SG, Kim SH, Jang JS, Kim MC, Kim KH, Han JY and Kim HJ: Clinical significances of preoperative serum interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein level in operable gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 9:1552009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Pine SR, Mechanic LE, Enewold L, Chaturvedi AK, Katki HA, Zheng YL, Bowman ED, Engels EA, Caporaso NE and Harris CC: Increased levels of circulating interleukin 6, interleukin 8, C-reactive protein, and risk of lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 103:1112–1122. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Lee S, Choe JW, Kim HK and Sung J: High-sensitivity C-reactive protein and cancer. J Epidemiol. 21:161–168. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Hefler LA, Concin N, Hofstetter G, Marth C, Mustea A, Sehouli J, Zeillinger R, Leipold H, Lass H, Grimm C, Tempfer CB and Reinthaller A: Serum C-reactive protein as independent prognostic variable in patients with ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 14:710–714. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Crumley AB, McMillan DC, McKernan M, Going JJ, Shearer CJ and Stuart RC: An elevated C-reactive protein concentration, prior to surgery, predicts poor cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing resection for gastrooesophageal cancer. Br J Cancer. 94:1568–1571. 2006.

16 

Nagaoka S, Yoshida T, Akiyoshi J, Akiba J, Torimura T, Adachi H, Kurogi J, Tajiri N, Inoue K, Niizeki T, Koga H, Imaizumi T, Kojiro M and Sata M: Serum C-reactive protein levels predict survival in hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 27:1091–1097. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Polterauer S, Grimm C, Tempfer C, Sliutz G, Speiser P, Reinthaller A and Hefler LA: C-reactive protein is a prognostic parameter in patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 107:114–117. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Ishizuka M, Nagata H, Takagi K and Kubota K: C-reactive protein is associated with distant metastasis of T3 colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res. 32:1409–1415. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

19 

Lee WS, Baek JH, You DH and Nam MJ: Prognostic value of circulating cytokines for stage III colon cancer. J Surg Res. 182:49–54. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

20 

Lin MS, Huang JX, Zhu JY and Shen HZ: Elevation of platelet count in patients with colorectal cancer predicts tendency to metastases and poor prognosis. Hepatogastroenterology. 59:1687–1690. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

21 

Saito K, Kawakami S, Ohtsuka Y, Fujii Y, Masuda H, Kumagai J, Kobayashi T, Kageyama Y and Kihara K: The impact of preoperative serum C-reactive protein on the prognosis of patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma treated surgically. BJU Int. 100:269–273. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Stein B, Schrader AJ, Wegener G, Seidel C, Kuczyk MA and Steffens S: Preoperative serum C- reactive protein: a prognostic marker in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 13:101–105. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Hussain SP and Harris CC: Inflammation and cancer: an ancient link with novel potentials. Int J Cancer. 121:2373–2380. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Helicobacter and Cancer Collaborative Group. Gastric cancer and Helicobacter pylori: a combined analysis of 12 case control studies nested within prospective cohorts. Gut. 49:347–353. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Eaden JA, Abrams KR and Mayberry JF: The risk of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. Gut. 48:526–535. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Jess T, Gamborg M, Matzen P, Munkholm P and Sørensen TI: Increased risk of intestinal cancer in Crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis of populationbased cohort studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 100:2724–2729. 2005.

27 

Kushner I, Rzewnicki D and Damols D: What does minor elevation of C-reactive protein signify? Am J Med. 119:166.e17–e28. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Heikkilä K, Ebrahim S and Lawlor DA: A systematic review of the association between circulating concentrations of C reactive protein and cancer. J Epidemiol Community Health. 61:824–833. 2007.PubMed/NCBI

29 

Nozoe T, Saeki H and Sugimachi K: Significance of preoperative elevation of serum C-reactive protein as an indicator of prognosis in esophageal carcinoma. Am J Surg. 182:197–201. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Sanjay P, de Figueiredo RS, Leaver H, Ogston S, Kulli C, Polignano FM and Tait IS: Preoperative serum C-reactive proteinlevels and post-operative lymph node ratio are important predictors of survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. JOP. 13:199–204. 2012.

31 

Slaviero KA, Clarke SJ and Rivory LP: Inflammatory response: an unrecognised source of variability in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cancer chemotherapy. Lancet Oncol. 4:224–232. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

32 

Erlinger TP, Platz EA, Rifai N and Helzlsouer KJ: C-reactive protein and the risk of incident colorectal cancer. JAMA. 291:585–590. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Gunter MJ, Stolzenberg-Solomon R, Cross AJ, Leitzmann MF, Weinstein S, Wood RJ, Virtamo J, Taylor PR, Albanes D and Sinha R: A prospective study of serum C-reactive protein and colorectal cancer risk in men. Cancer Res. 66:2483–2487. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Il’yasova D, Colbert LH, Harris TB, Newman AB, Bauer DC, Satterfield S and Kritchevsky SB: Circulating levels of inflammatory markers and cancer risk in the health aging and body composition cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 14:2413–2418. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

35 

Ito Y, Suzuki K, Tamakoshi K, Wakai K, Kojima M, Ozasa K, Watanabe Y, Kawado M, Hashimoto S, Suzuki S, Tokudome S, Toyoshima H, Hayakawa N, Kato K, Watanabe M, Ohta Y, Maruta M and Tamakoshi A; JACC Study Group. Colorectal cancer and serum C-reactive protein levels: a case control study nested in the JACC Study. J Epidemiol. 15(Suppl 2): S185–S189. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Otani T, Iwasaki M, Sasazuki S, Inoue M and Tsugane S: Plasma C-reactive protein and risk of colorectal cancer in a nested case-control study: Japan Public Health Center-based prospective study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 15:690–695. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Siemes C, Visser LE, Coebergh JW, et al: C-reactive protein levels, variation in the C-reactive protein gene, and cancer risk: the Rotterdam Study. J Clin Oncol. 24:5216–5222. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Trichopoulos D, Psaltopoulou T, Orfanos P, Trichopoulou A and Boffetta P: Plasma C-reactive protein and risk of cancer: a prospective study from Greece. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 15:381–384. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Zhang SM, Buring JE, Lee IM, Cook NR and Ridker PM: C-reactive protein levels are not associated with increased risk for colorectal cancer in women. Ann Intern Med. 142:425–432. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Ognjanovic S, Yamamoto J, Saltzman B, Franke A, Ognjanovic M, Yokochi L, Vogt T, Decker R and Le Marchand L: Serum CRP and IL-6, genetic variants and risk of colorectal adenoma in a multiethnic population. Cancer Causes Control. 21:1131–1138. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Tsilidis KK, Branchini C, Guallar E, Helzlsouer KJ, Erlinger TP and Platz EA: C-reactive protein and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review of prospective studies. Int J Cancer. 123:1133–1140. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Guo YZ, Pan L, Du CJ, Ren DQ and Xie XM: Association between C-reactive protein and risk of cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev. 14:243–248. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Gunter MJ, Stolzenberg-Solomon R, Cross AJ, Leitzmann MF, Weinstein S, Wood RJ, Virtamo J, Taylor PR, Albanes D and Sinha R: A prospective study of serum C-reactive protein and colorectal cancer risk in men. Cancer Res. 66:2483–2487. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Bollschweiler E, Metzger R, Drebber U, Baldus S, Vallböhmer D, Kocher M and Hölscher AH: Histological type of esophageal cancer might affect response to neo-adjuvant radiochemotherapy and subsequent prognosis. Ann Oncol. 20:231–238. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

D’Angelo E, Espinosa I, Ali R, Gilks CB, Rijn M, Lee CH and Prat J: Uterine leiomyosarcomas: tumor size, mitotic index, and biomarkers Ki67, and Bcl-2 identify two groups with different prognosis. Gynecol Oncol. 121:328–333. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

46 

Ma J, Liu L, Tang L, Zong J, Lin A, Lu T, Cui N, Cui C and Li L: Retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: prognostic value and staging categories. Clin Cancer Res. 13:1445–1452. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Zacharakis M, Xynos ID, Lazaris A, Smaro T, Kosmas C, Dokou A, Felekouras E, Efstathios A, Polyzos A, Sarantonis J, Syrios J, Zografos G, Papalambros A and Tsavaris N: Predictors of survival in stage IV metastatic colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res. 30:653–660. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

48 

McMillan DC, Canna K and McArdle CS: Systemic inflammatory response predicts survival following curative resection of colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 90:215–219. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar

49 

Siemes C, Visser LE, Coebergh JW, Splinter TAW, Witteman JCM, Uitterlinden AG, Hofman A, Pols HAP and Stricker BH: C-reactive protein levels, variation in the C-reactive protein gene, and cancer risk: the Rotterdam Study. J Clin Oncol. 24:5216–5222. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Ramsey S, Lamb GWA, Aitchison M and McMillan DC: The longitudinal relationship between circulating concentrations of C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 in patients undergoing resection for renal cancer. Br J Cancer. 95:1076–1080. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

51 

Nozoe T, Korenaga D, Futatsugi M, Saeki H, Maehara Y and Sugimachi K: Immunohistochemical expression of C-reactive protein in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus-significance as a tumor marker. Cancer Lett. 192:89–95. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Rutkowski P, Kaminska J, Kowalska M, Ruka W and Steffen J: Cytokine serum levels in soft tissue sarcoma patients: correlations with clinico-pathological features and prognosis. Int J Cancer. 100:463–471. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Wigmore SJ, Fearon KC, Sangster K, Maingay JP, Garden OJ and Ross JA: Cytokine regulation of constitutive production of interleukin-8 and -6 by human pancreatic cancer cell lines and serum cytokine concentrations in patients with pancreatic cancer. Int J Oncol. 21:881–886. 2002.

Related Articles

Journal Cover

December 2013
Volume 6 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Lin M, Huang J, Zhu J and Shen H: Elevated pre‑treatment levels of high sensitivity C‑reactive protein as a potential prognosticator in patients with colorectal cancer. Exp Ther Med 6: 1369-1374, 2013
APA
Lin, M., Huang, J., Zhu, J., & Shen, H. (2013). Elevated pre‑treatment levels of high sensitivity C‑reactive protein as a potential prognosticator in patients with colorectal cancer. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 6, 1369-1374. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1350
MLA
Lin, M., Huang, J., Zhu, J., Shen, H."Elevated pre‑treatment levels of high sensitivity C‑reactive protein as a potential prognosticator in patients with colorectal cancer". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 6.6 (2013): 1369-1374.
Chicago
Lin, M., Huang, J., Zhu, J., Shen, H."Elevated pre‑treatment levels of high sensitivity C‑reactive protein as a potential prognosticator in patients with colorectal cancer". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 6, no. 6 (2013): 1369-1374. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1350