Expression and clinical significance of angiotensin II type 1 receptor in human hepatocellular carcinoma

  • Authors:
    • Yun-Fei Duan
    • Xiao-Dong Li
    • Feng Zhu
    • Feng Zhang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 15, 2013     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1411
  • Pages: 323-328
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the expression of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT-1R) mRNA and the AT-1R protein in human primary hepatocellular carcinoma (PHC), and to attempt to elucidate their association with pathological and clinical characteristics. Fresh tumor and normal liver tissues were obtained from 44 patients with PHC following hepatectomies. AT-1R mRNA levels were quantitatively analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) while the protein levels were assessed by immunohistochemistry. The expression levels of AT-1R were observed in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues and normal liver tissues. The level of AT-1R protein expression in normal liver tissues was higher compared with that in PHC tissues (P=0.0033). The AT‑1R mRNA levels were higher in patients with negative hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg), normal α-fetoprotein (AFP) levels and high tumor differentiation, compared with those in patients with positive HBsAg (P=0.0005), upregulated AFP levels (P=0.0008) and poor tumor differentiation (P=0.0290). No significant correlation was identified between the expression levels of AT-1R mRNA and general characteristics such as gender, age, cirrhotic nodules, tumor size, tumor encapsulation, tumor number, carcinoma embolus, tumor metastasis or tumor recurrence. Downregulated levels of AT-1R mRNA and AT-1R protein may indicate a poor prognosis for patients with PHC.

Introduction

Primary hepatocellular carcinoma (PHC), a prevalent cancer, is the third leading cause of cancer related mortality (1,2). Furthermore, the incidence of PHC is increasing in many countries and regions, particularly in China (2). Additionally, only ~20% of patients are eligible for curative surgery, with limited therapeutic options for those who are ineligible. Failure to achieve a timely diagnosis, in addition to the limited efficacy of palliative treatments, contributes to the poor prognosis for PHC patients. Furthermore, PHC remains a highly lethal disease due to the recurrence of metastasis, thereby leading to poor patient prognosis (3).

Due to the scarcity of efficacious testing methods, the identification of novel PHC biomarkers is necessary. To date, several studies have focused on tests that are capable of detecting and monitoring PHC, including tests for the ratio of glycosylated α-fetoprotein (AFP; L3 fraction) to total AFP, and prothrombin induced by vitamin K absence II (PIVKA II), α-fucosidase and HSP-70 levels (4). However, the specificity and sensitivity of these serological markers are low and have been demonstrated to be inadequate and impractical for the purposes of PHC screening, even when they are combined (2).

Angiotensin II (AT-II) is a major peptide hormone of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), which is crucial for maintaining cardiovascular homeostasis and mediating diverse physiological functions such as cell growth, differentiation and apoptosis (5). The majority of AT-II actions are mediated by its two sub-receptors, which are the AT-II type 1 receptor (AT-1R) and the AT-II type 2 receptor (AT-2R) (6). These two subunits control the effects of AT-II on various organs (5,7), while AT-2R is less common than AT-1R and has been observed in fetal cells (8).

Previous studies have revealed AT-II to have major functions in several aspects of neoplastic diseases, which indicate an anti-neoplastic action for AT-II by binding to activated AT-1R (9). Activation of the AT-1R associated with tumor development may be via various pathways. AT-1R has the potential to stimulate tumor growth factors, which results in the suppression of immune function (10). AT-1R assists vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to promote tumor vessel growth. Furthermore, AT-1R is capable of mediating inflammation by stimulating various inflammatory factors including interleukin 1β, tumor necrosis factor-α, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and adrenomedullins (11,12). These effects cause enduring tumor vessel growth, tumor invasion and metastasis, and immunosuppression, thereby leading to the development of tumors. Kawamata et al(13) transformed non-invasive esophageal cancer cells into AT-1R overexpressed invasive esophageal cancer cells, and suggested that nine inflammation-related genes in the cells were altered, indicating that AT-1R promoted tumor growth via inflammation-inducing factors.

Numerous studies have reported that AT-1R overexpression is potentially associated with various malignancies such as non-small cell lung cancer (14), gastric cancer (15,16), breast cancer (17,18), ovarian cancer (19), bladder cancer (20,21), pancreatic cancer (22,23) and prostate cancer (2427). However, currently there is limited literature regarding AT-1R expression in patients with PHC and the results are frequently contradictory. Di et al(28) demonstrated that AT-1R was overexpressed in human hepatocellular carcinoma tissues by using immunohistochemistry, and thus concluded it was a marker reflecting the degree of malignancy of the hepatocellular carcinoma. However, Wu et al(29) concluded that the levels of AT-1Rs in normal tissues were markedly higher compared with those in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues by immunohistochemistry in a murine xenograft hepatocellular cancer model. Nevertheless, the two studies used traditional semi-quantitative methods, which leads to a certain degree of subjectivity and possible inaccuracy. Additionally, subgroups of PHC were not mentioned.

This study aimed to determine AT-1R mRNA and AT-1R protein levels in PHC tissues, elucidate their association with the clinicopathological characteristics of PHC and confirm the clinical value of AT-1R as a biomarker for PHC in clinical diagnosis.

Patients and methods

Patient enrollment and tissue samples

In total, 44 patients with PHC were enrolled between January 2007 and June 2013 in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Changzhou, China). All diagnoses were verified pathologically. Clinical data were obtained by retrospective chart review. Survival was determined from the date of the initial surgery. Follow-up was available for all patients. The survival period ranged from 1–72 months (mean, 24.1±16.4 months). Of the 44 patients, 36 were male and 8 were female. The ages ranged between 28–78 years with an average age of 52 years. All enrolled patients were treated with radical surgery for PHC and received no other treatments. A section of tumor tissue 0.5×0.5×0.5 cm was obtained from each patient immediately after the surgery. Additionally a section of normal liver tissue, 0.5×0.5×0.5 cm and >5 cm away from the tumor margin was obtained. All tissue samples were fixed in 10% formalin, embedded in paraffin, and routinely stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Specimens were assessed blindly and independently by two pathologists. In case of interobserver disagreement, final decisions were achieved by general consensus. The cancer grading was determined by histology according to Edmondson’s criteria (30). Edmondson’s grade I–II was designated low-grade PHC and Edmondson grade III–IV was designated high-grade PHC. All enrolled patients provided written consent. The protocol was approved by the institutional ethics review board at Soochow University. This study complies with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)

Unless indicated otherwise, all reagents for qPCR were purchased from Fermentas-China Inc. (Shenzhen, China). Total RNA was extracted from the tumor and normal tissues using an extraction reagent (Shennengbocai Inc., Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA samples were stored at −70°C until required. PCR was performed using a RevertAid™ First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit with PCR primers for synaptophysin designed by TaqMan® Gene Expression Assays (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). RNA (3 μg) was reverse transcribed using the First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit with 0.5 μg oligo(dT)16 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The reaction mixture was incubated at 70°C for 5 min, and subsequently at 0°C for 30 sec. The cDNA concentration was determined by spectrophotometer. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as an internal control. Specific primers for AT-1R were synthesized as follows: forwards, 5′-AGACAGATGACGGCTGCTCG-3′; reverse, 5′-AACAATCTGGAACTCTCATCTCCTG-3′. Specific primers for GAPDH were synthesized as follows: forwards, 5′-GGAAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTC-3′; reverse, 5′-CGTTCTCAGCCTTGACGGT-3′. The cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 sec, and a final extension for 45 sec at 60°C. The relative level of gene expression was evaluated using 2−ΔΔCt.

Immunohistochemistry

All reagents for immunohistochemistry were obtained from R&D systems, Inc. (Minneapolis, MN, USA). Tissue sections (5 μm) were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated in an ethanol series and subsequently treated for 30 min with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and unmasked in a citrate antigen unmasking solution for 20 min at 120°C. The sections were incubated with primary antibodies [rabbit anti-human polyclonal antibody to AT-1R (1/50)] for 1 h at room temperature. The bound primary antibodies were detected by adding secondary antibodies (peroxidase labeled goat anti-human IgG) and avidin/biotin/horseradish peroxidase complex (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) for 30 min at room temperature. The sections were visualized using solid diaminobenzidine diluted with PBS, counterstained with hematoxylin and mounted. Breast cancer tissue was used as the positive control. Three independent investigators assessed the positivity of AT-1R semiquantitatively without prior knowledge of the clinical study. The intensity of cytoplasmic staining was defined as negative (stained cells, <20%) or positive (stained cells, ≥20%).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The differences in AT-1R mRNA levels between PHC tissues and normal tissues were compared using the Wilcoxon test. The differences in AT-1R mRNA among various subgroups of PHC were analyzed using the non-pairing t-test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Baseline patient characteristics

Baseline patient characteristics, including gender, age, pathological grade, HBS infection status, tumor size and number as well as recurrence status are shown in Table I.

Table I

Baseline patient characteristics (n=44).

Table I

Baseline patient characteristics (n=44).

Clinicopathologic factorsNo. patients%
Gender
 Female3681.8
 Male818.2
Age (years)
 Average52
 Range28–78
Edmondson’s pathological grade
 I–II2454.5
 III–IV2045.5
HBsAg infection
 Positive4090.9
 Negative49.1
AFP (ng/ml)
 ≤20613.6
 >203886.4
Hepatocirrhotic nodule (cm)
 ≤33477.3
 >31022.7
Tumor size (cm)
 ≤5818.2
 >53681.9
Tumor encapsulation
 Yes2659.1
 No1840.9
Tumor number
 Single3477.3
 Multiple1022.7
Cancerous embolus
 Yes1431.8
 No3068.2
Recurrence
 Yes1022.7
 No3477.3

[i] HBsAg, hepatitis B virus surface antigen; AFP, α-fetoprotein.

AT-1R mRNA expression

AT-1R mRNA and GAPDH mRNA were expressed in all hepatocellular carcinoma tissues and normal liver tissues. In 40 cases (90.9%), the AT-1R mRNA expression level in normal tissues was higher compared with that in the tumor tissues, and the opposite was observed for the other four cases. The difference was considered to be statistically significant (P=0.0033). The relative expression rates of AT-1R mRNA in normal tissues and in tumor tissues were 100 and 32.16%, respectively (Fig. 1).

AT-1R protein expression

The majority of the AT-1R expression was detected in the cytoplasm. The number of positively stained cells and the staining density were markedly higher in the normal tissues compared with those in the tumor tissues (Fig. 2).

Correlation between AT-1R mRNA expression and clinicopathological factors

The AT-1R mRNA expression levels in cases which were positive for HBsAg infection (40/44) were markedly higher compared with those in cases which were negative for HBsAg infection (4/44) (P=0.0005). The AT-1R mRNA expression levels in cases with normal AFP levels (6/44) were markedly higher compared with those in cases with aberrantly increased AFP levels (38/44) (P=0.0008). The AT-1R mRNA expression levels in cases with Edmondson’s pathological grade I–II (24/44) were markedly higher compared with that in cases with Edmondson’s pathological grade III–IV (20/44) (P=0.0290; Table II).

Table II

Correlation between the clinicopathological factors of PHC patients and AT-1R levels in tumor tissues (n=44).

Table II

Correlation between the clinicopathological factors of PHC patients and AT-1R levels in tumor tissues (n=44).

Clinicopathological factorCasesAT-1R/GAPDH (Mean ± SD)t-valueP-value
Gender
 Male360.3199±0.41040.04070.9680
 Female80.3292±0.4140
Age (years)
 ≤50180.3341±0.29430.11830.9070
 >50260.3130±0.4728
HBsAg
 Negative41.1660±0.85654.16700.0005a
 Positive400.2371±0.2378
AFP (ng/ml)
 ≤2060.9730±0.77843.93400.0008a
 >20380.2188±0.1961
Hepatocirrhotic nodule (cm)
 ≤3340.3426±0.41420.44310.6624
 >3100.2504±0.3873
Tumor size (cm)
 ≤580.1225±0.07141.10300.2829
 >5360.3659±0.4317
Tumor encapsulation
 No180.1999±0.14911.19600.2456
 Yes260.4059±0.4979
Edmondson’s pathological grade
 I–II240.4881±0.48412.35200.0290a
 III–IV200.1218±0.0867
Tumor number
 Single340.3323±0.42570.22500.8243
 Multiple100.2853±0.3429
Cancerous embolus
 No300.3840±0.46361.07300.2962
 Yes140.1878±0.1759
Recurrence
 No340.3413±0.43700.41630.6816
 Yes100.2546±0.2710

a P<0.05.

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn3-etm-07-02-0323'] } PHC, primary hepatocellular carcinoma; AT-1R, angiotensin II type 1 receptor; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; HBsAg, hepatitis B virus surface antigen; AFP, α-fetoprotein.

Notably, the data from the 5-year follow-up demonstrated a correlation between AT-1R mRNA expression level and patient survival rate. In cases with high levels of AT-1R mRNA expression, the 3-year survival rate was 46%, with a median survival time of 35.5 months. However, in cases with low levels of AT-1R mRNA expression, the 3-year survival rate was 26%, with a median survival time of 15.6 months (Fig. 3).

However, no correlation was observed between AT-1R mRNA expression and other clinical features, such as age, gender, tumor number, tumor size, cirrhosis status, tumor encapsulation, cancerous embolus and recurrence (Table II).

Discussion

PHC represents a paradigm of the correlation between the tumor microenvironment and tumor development (31). It has been demonstrated that controlling the growth of tumor vessels is an important modality for the treatment of PHC.

To date, the function of the VEGF family for generating tumor vessel growth has been relatively well clarified (32). VEGF is crucial in the development of PHC by inducing tumor vessel growth in the early stages, and VEGF levels have been observed to correlate positively with microvessel density (33). However, the mechanism by which VEGF regulates PHC cells growth has not been fully elucidated. Fujiyama et al(34) demonstrated that AT-II promoted the expression of VEGF by endothelial cells.

The results of the present study indicated that the level of AT-1R expression in normal liver tissues was higher than that in tumor tissues, potentially due to that fact that the majority of PHC cases had HBV-related hepatocirrhosis (36/44). This indicates that the upregulation of AT-1R expression is correlated with hepatocyte proliferation. Furthermore, it was observed that the AT-1R mRNA expression level correlated negatively with hepatocyte differentiation. Once PHC formed an invasive cancer, which broke through the basement membrane, AT-1R expression was downregulated. Takeda et al(35) demonstrated that positive rates of AT-1R expression in well-differentiated, moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinomas were 81, 72 and 0%, respectively, which were consistent with the results of the present study.

De Paepe et al(36) applied immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization to investigate the expression of AT-1R in various stages of breast cancer, and the results revealed that AT-1R was overexpressed in neoplasms with a relatively low level of malignancy. These results are consistent with those of the present study. De Paepe et al(36) hypothesized that AT-1R was an important mediator for the precursors of breast cancer but not a necessary protein for invasive breast cancer. Similarly, we considered that AT-1R is unnecessary for PHC. Lower expression levels of AT-1R in PHC tissues leave the blood supply for PHC cells unaffected by AT-II, leading to the sustained growth of PHC; this is a difference between PHC and normal vessels.

Notably, the data from the present study demonstrated that patients with higher levels of AT-1R mRNA expression have an improved survival rate, indicating that AT-1R is a novel prognostic factor in hepatic carcinoma.

In conclusion, AT-1R mRNA is expressed in normal liver tissue and PHC tissue. AT-1R mRNA levels correlate negatively with the degree of malignancy of PHC, which is a potential cause of the increased blood supply in PHC tissues. AT-1R mRNA expression correlates with PHC cell differentiation, but does not correlate with gender, age, hepatocirrhotic nodules, tumor size, tumor number, cancerous embolus, tumor encapsulation or tumor recurrence. These results suggest that AT-1R expression correlates with PHC development, and inhibits AT-1R expression prior to invasive tumor formation, which may prevent PHC from growing progressively. Future studies concerning the correlation between AT-1R and other ligands are warranted.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr Chun Yang for technical support. This work was funded by grants from the Jiangsu Health International Exchange Supporting Program provided by Xiao-Dong Li.

References

1 

Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al: Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 61:69–90. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Bruix J and Sherman M; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology. 53:1020–1022. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Bruix J, Boix L, Sala M and Llovet JM: Focus on hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 5:215–219. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Bruix J and Sherman M; Practice Guidelines Committee, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 42:1208–1236. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Paul M, Poyan Mehr A and Kreutz R: Physiology of local renin-angiotensin systems. Physiol Rev. 86:747–803. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Wang CH, Li F and Takahashi N: The renin angiotensin system and the metabolic syndrome. Open Hypertens J. 3:1–13. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Tahmasebi M, Barker S, Puddefoot JR and Vinson GP: Localisation of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) components in breast. Br J Cancer. 95:67–74. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Jethon A, Pula B, Piotrowska A, et al: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT-1R) expression correlates with VEGF-A and VEGF-D expression in invasive ductal breast cancer. Pathol Oncol Res. 18:867–873. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Deshayes F and Nahmias C: Angiotensin receptors: a new role in cancer? Trends Endocrinol Metab. 16:293–299. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Kobie JJ, Wu RS, Kurt RA, et al: Transforming growth factor beta inhibits the antigen-presenting functions and antitumor activity of dendritic cell vaccines. Cancer Res. 63:1860–1864. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

11 

Suzuki Y, Ruiz-Ortega M, Lorenzo O, et al: Inflammation and angiotensin II. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 35:881–900. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Tsutamoto T, Wada A, Maeda K, et al: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist decreases plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-6 and soluble adhesion molecules in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 35:714–721. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Kawamata H, Furihata T, Omotehara F, et al: Identification of genes differentially expressed in a newly isolated human metastasizing esophageal cancer cell line, T.Tn-AT1, by cDNA microarray. Cancer Sci. 94:699–706. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Wilop S, von Hobe S, Crysandt M, et al: Impact of angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers on survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer undergoing first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 135:1429–1435. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Huang W, Wu YL, Zhong J, et al: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist suppress angiogenesis and growth of gastric cancer xenografts. Dig Dis Sci. 53:1206–1210. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Huang W, Yu LF, Zhong J, et al: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor expression in human gastric cancer and induces MMP2 and MMP9 expression in MKN-28 cells. Dig Dis Sci. 53:163–168. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Inwang ER, Puddefoot JR, Brown CL, et al: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor expression in human breast tissues. Br J Cancer. 75:1279–1283. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Chen X, Meng Q, Zhao Y, et al: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists inhibit cell proliferation and angiogenesis in breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 328:318–324. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Ino K, Shibata K, Kajiyama H, et al: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor expression in ovarian cancer and its correlation with tumour angiogenesis and patient survival. Br J Cancer. 94:552–560. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Tanaka N, Miyajima A, Kosaka T, et al: Acquired platinum resistance enhances tumour angiogenesis through angiotensin II type 1 receptor in bladder cancer. Br J Cancer. 105:1331–1337. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Shirotake S, Miyajima A, Kosaka T, et al: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor expression and microvessel density in human bladder cancer. Urology. 77:e19–25. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Ohta T, Amaya K, Yi S, et al: Angiotensin converting enzyme-independent, local angiotensin II-generation in human pancreatic ductal cancer tissues. Int J Oncol. 23:593–598. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

23 

Gong Q, Davis M, Chipitsyna G, et al: Blocking angiotensin II type 1 receptor triggers apoptotic cell death in human pancreatic cancer cells. Pancreas. 39:581–594. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Uemura H, Ishiguro H, Nakaigawa N, et al: Angiotensin II receptor blocker shows antiproliferative activity in prostate cancer cells: a possibility of tyrosine kinase inhibitor of growth factor. Mol Cancer Ther. 2:1139–1147. 2003.

25 

Guimond MO, Battista MC, Nikjouitavabi F, et al: Expression and role of the angiotensin II AT2 receptor in human prostate tissue: in search of a new therapeutic option for prostate cancer. Prostate. 73:1057–1068. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Hoshino K, Ishiguro H, Teranishi J, et al: Regulation of androgen receptor expression through angiotensin II type 1 receptor in prostate cancer cells. Prostate. 71:964–975. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Kosaka T, Miyajima A, Shirotake S, et al: Phosphorylated Akt up-regulates angiotensin II type-1 receptor expression in castration resistant prostate cancer. Prostate. 71:1510–1517. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

28 

Di MJ, Wang WX, Lan MY, et al: Expression and significance of angiotensin II typeI receptor in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Medical Journal of Wuhan University. 26:235–237. 2005.(In Chinese).

29 

Wu Y, Cahill PA and Sitzmann JV: Decreased angiotensin II receptors mediate decreased vascular response in hepatocellular cancer. Ann Surg. 223:225–231. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Edmondson HA and Steiner PE: Primary carcinoma of the liver: a study of 100 cases among 48,900 necropsies. Cancer. 7:462–503. 1954. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Capece D, Fischietti M, Verzella D, et al: The inflammatory microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma: a pivotal role for tumor-associated macrophages. Biomed Res Int. 2013:1872042013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Holash J, Maisonpierre PC, Compton D, et al: Vessel cooption, regression, and growth in tumors mediated by angiopoietins and VEGF. Science. 284:1994–1998. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Li XM, Tang ZY, Qin LX, et al: Serum vascular endothelial growth factor is a predictor of invasion and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 18:511–517. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

34 

Fujiyama S, Matsubara H, Nozawa Y, et al: Angiotensin AT(1) and AT(2) receptors differentially regulate angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor expression and angiogenesis by modulating heparin binding-epidermal growth factor (EGF)-mediated EGF receptor transactivation. Circ Res. 88:22–29. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Takeda H and Kondo S: Differences between squamous cell carcinoma and keratoacanthoma in angiotensin type-1 receptor expression. Am J Pathol. 158:1633–1637. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

De Paepe B, Verstraeten VL, De Potter CR, et al: Growth stimulatory angiotensin II type-1 receptor is upregulated in breast hyperplasia and in situ carcinoma but not in invasive carcinoma. Histochem Cell Biol. 116:247–254. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

2014-February
Volume 7 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Duan Y, Li X, Zhu F and Zhang F: Expression and clinical significance of angiotensin II type 1 receptor in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Exp Ther Med 7: 323-328, 2014
APA
Duan, Y., Li, X., Zhu, F., & Zhang, F. (2014). Expression and clinical significance of angiotensin II type 1 receptor in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 7, 323-328. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1411
MLA
Duan, Y., Li, X., Zhu, F., Zhang, F."Expression and clinical significance of angiotensin II type 1 receptor in human hepatocellular carcinoma". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 7.2 (2014): 323-328.
Chicago
Duan, Y., Li, X., Zhu, F., Zhang, F."Expression and clinical significance of angiotensin II type 1 receptor in human hepatocellular carcinoma". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 7, no. 2 (2014): 323-328. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1411