|
1
|
Ohshio I, Hatayama A, Kaneda K, Takahara M
and Nagashima K: Correlation between histopathologic features and
magnetic resonance images of spinal cord lesions. Spine (Phila Pa
1976). 18:1140–1149. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Yukawa Y, Kato F, Yoshihara H, Yanase M
and Ito K: MR T2 image classification in cervical compression
myelopathy: predictor of surgical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
32:1675–1679. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Shen HX, Li L, Yang ZG and Hou TS:
Position of increased signal intensity in the spinal cord on MR
images: does it predict the outcome of cervical spondylotic
myelopathy? Chin Med J (Engl). 122:1418–1422. 2009.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Lo YL: How has electrophysiology changed
the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy? Eur J Neurol.
15:781–786. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Barkhaus PE and Nandedkar SD: On the
selection of concentric needle electromyogram motor unit action
potentials: is the rise time criterion too restrictive? Muscle
Nerve. 19:1554–1560. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Bednarik J, Kadanka Z, Dusek L, et al:
Presymptomatic spondylotic cervical myelopathy: an updated
predictive model. Eur Spine J. 17:421–431. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Nurick S: The pathogenesis of the spinal
cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain.
95:87–100. 1972. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Naderi S, Ozgen S, Pamir MN, Ozek MM and
Erzen C: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgical results and
factors affecting prognosis. Neurosurgery. 43:43–50. 1998.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Kiris T and Kilinçer C: Cervical
spondylotic myelopathy treated by oblique corpectomy: a prospective
study. Neurosurgery. 62:674–682. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Nagata K, Kiyonaga K, Ohashi T, Sagara M,
Miyazaki S and Inoue A: Clinical value of magnetic resonance
imaging for cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
15:1088–1096. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Okada Y, Ikata T, Yamada H, Sakamoto R and
Katoh S: Magnetic resonance imaging study on the results of surgery
for cervical compression myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
18:2024–2029. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Suri A, Chabbra RP, Mehta VS, Gaikwad S
and Pandey RM: Effect of intramedullary signal changes on the
surgical outcome of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Spine J. 3:33–45. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Zhang YZ, Shen Y, Wang LF, Ding WY, Xu JX
and He J: Magnetic resonance T2 image signal intensity ratio and
clinical manifestation predict prognosis after surgical
intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa
1976). 35:E396–E399. 2010.
|
|
14
|
Zhang P, Shen Y, Zhang YZ, Ding WY and
Wang LF: Significance of increased signal intensity on MRI in
prognosis after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic
myelopathy. J Clin Neurosci. 18:1080–1083. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Mastronardi L, Elsawaf A, Roperto R, et
al: Prognostic relevance of the postoperative evolution of
intramedullary spinal cord changes in signal intensity on magnetic
resonance imaging after anterior decompression for cervical
spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. 7:615–622. 2007.
View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
al-Mefty O, Harkey HL, Marawi I, et al:
Experimental chronic compressive cervical myelopathy. J Neurosurg.
79:550–561. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Lo YL, Chan LL, Leoh T, et al: Diagnostic
utility of F waves in cervical radiculopathy: electrophysiological
and magnetic resonance imaging correlation. Clin Neurol Neurosurg.
110:58–61. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Stewart CR, Nandedkar SD, Massey JM,
Gilchrist JM, Barkhaus PE and Sanders DB: Evaluation of an
automatic method of measuring features of motor unit action
potentials. Muscle Nerve. 12:141–148. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Ito T, Oyanagi K, Takahashi H, Takahashi
HE and Ikuta F: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clinicopathologic
study on the progression pattern and thin myelinated fibers of the
lesions of seven patients examined during complete autopsy. Spine
(Phila Pa 1976). 21:827–833. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
20
|
Ramanauskas WL, Wilner HI, Metes JJ, Lazo
A and Kelly JK: MR imaging of compressive myelomalacia. J Comput
Assist Tomogr. 13:399–404. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Morio Y, Teshima R, Nagashima H, Nawata K,
Yamasaki D and Nanjo Y: Correlation between operative outcomes of
cervical compression myelopathy and mri of the spinal cord. Spine
(Phila Pa 1976). 26:1238–1245. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22
|
Chen CJ, Lyu RK, Lee ST, Wong YC and Wang
LJ: Intramedullary high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images
in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: prediction of prognosis with
type of intensity. Radiology. 221:789–794. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, et al:
Postoperative changes in spinal cord signal intensity in patients
with cervical compression myelopathy: comparison between
preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance images. J
Neurosurg Spine. 8:524–528. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar
|
