Application of renal‑rotation techniques in retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy
- Authors:
- Chun‑Hua Lin
- Qing‑Zuo Liu
- Ke Wang
- Sheng‑Qiang Yu
- Hong‑Wei Zhao
- Jian‑Tao Wang
- Guang‑Lei Li
- Zhen‑Li Gao
View Affiliations
Affiliations: Department of Urology, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University Medical College, Yantai, Shandong 264000, P.R. China
- Published online on: February 13, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2294
-
Pages:
1149-1152
-
Copyright: © Lin
et al. This is an open access article distributed under the
terms of Creative
Commons Attribution License.
Metrics: Total
Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
This article is mentioned in:
Abstract
Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is one of the standard methods for treating T1‑stage renal carcinoma, which has a narrow operational space and a difficult surgical procedure. The aim of this study was to examine the safety and feasibility of renal‑rotation techniques in RPN. Between April 2012 and June 2014, the renal‑rotation technique in RPN was performed in 22 male and 16 female patients, aged between 31 and 75 years (mean, 52 years), with stage T1N0M0 renal‑cell carcinoma. In 29 cases the tumor was located at the ventral side of the kidney, including 22 cases at the renal hilum, and in nine cases the tumor was located at the inferior pole of the kidney. The tumor size was between 1.5 and 4.6 cm (mean, 2.8 cm). The results showed that, in all 38 cases, the procedure was successfully accomplished without conversion to open surgery. There were no intraoperative complications and only three cases of postoperative complications. The surgery duration was between 45 and 116 min (mean, 59 min); blood loss was between 10 and 120 ml (mean, 40 ml) and no patients required a blood transfusion. The average kidney ischemia time was 21 min (range, 15‑38 min). No patients had local recurrence or metastasis after follow‑up of between one and 26 months. In conclusion, the application of the renal‑rotation technique in RPN for tumors located at the ventral side, renal hilum or at the inferior pole of the kidney is safe and feasible and worth wider clinical application.
View References
|
1
|
Rini BI, Rathmell WK and Godley P: Renal
cell carcinoma. Curr Opin Oncol. 20:300–306. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Cohen HT and McGovern FJ: Renal-cell
carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 353:2477–2490. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, et
al; Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Urological
Association. Guideline for the management of the clinical T1 renal
mass. J Urol. 182:1271–1279. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Porpiglia F, Volpe A, Billia M and Scarpa
RM: Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy: analysis of the
current literature. Eur Urol. 53:732–743. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Gill IS, Matin SF, Desai MM, et al:
Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial
nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients. J Urol. 170:64–68.
2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Gill IS, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, et al:
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: duplicating open
surgical techniques. J Urol. 167:469–477. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Li M, Zhou LQ, Li NC, Zhang XC and Na YQ:
Analysis of complications of retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery
(with experience of 1560 cases). Zhonghua Mi Niao Wai Ke Za Zhi.
28:810–812. 2007.(In Chinese).
|
|
8
|
Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG,
Greene FL and Trotti A: Kidney. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed.
Springer Verlag; New York: pp. 479–489. 2010
|
|
9
|
Wang K, Zhang YL, Lin CH, et al:
Application of self-retaining bidirectional barbed absorbable
suture in retroperito-neoscopic partial nephrectomy. Int Braz J
Urol. 40:220–224. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Marszalek M, Chromecki T, Al-Ali BM, et
al: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of
the transperitoneal versus the retroperitoneal approach. Urology.
77:109–113. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
11
|
Allaf ME, Bhayani SB, Rogers C, et al:
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: evaluation of long-term
oncological outcome. J Urol. 172:871–873. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Kijvikai K, Viprakasit DP, Milhoua P,
Clark PE and Herrell SD: A simple, effective method to create
laparoscopic renal protective hypothermia with cold saline surface
irrigation: clinical application and assessment. J Urol.
184:1861–1866. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Thompson RH, Lane BR, Lohse CM, et al:
Every minute counts when the renal hilium is clamped during partial
nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 58:340–345. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
