Importance of risk factors for the evaluation of patients with a suspected pulmonary embolism

  • Authors:
    • Joachim Gruettner
    • Tim Viergutz
    • Merle Bolte
    • Thomas Henzler
    • Stefan O. Schoenberg
    • Sonja Sudarski
    • Paul Apfaltrer
    • Thomas Walter
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 30, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2395
  • Pages: 2281-2284
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The reliable exclusion of a pulmonary embolism (PE) in hemodynamically stable patients remains a challenge. The European Society of Cardiology guidelines for PE diagnosis published in 2008 and updated in 2014 recommend a low-threshold computed tomography (CT) indication for patients with a high probability of pulmonary embolism or those with elevated levels of D-dimers. Certain elements of the recommendations are controversial, while others, including the evaluation of the risk factors for PE, are considered only in individual cases. In the present study, various risk factors, including obesity, smoking, contraceptive use, immobility level, history of malignant disease and thrombophilia and the factors of familial predisposition, deep vein thrombosis (DVT)/PE‑history, long‑distance flying <1 week and surgery <4 weeks previously, were retrospectively examined in 492 patients with a suspected PE. The data demonstrated a significant risk of PE with contraceptive use, a history of DVT/PE and thrombophilia. The immobility level, surgery <4 weeks and long‑distance flying <1 week previously, as well as family history, malignant disease, obesity and smoking, were not observed to be associated with a significantly higher risk of PE. Contraceptive use and thrombophilia, in addition to a history of DVT/PE, each appear to have a significant predictive value in the context of PE risk stratification. Therefore, patients with a suspected PE, who additionally present with at least one of the aforementioned risk factors, should undergo further diagnostic steps for PE risk stratification, including a low‑threshold CT examination, even in the absence of elevated D-dimers.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

June-2015
Volume 9 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Gruettner J, Viergutz T, Bolte M, Henzler T, Schoenberg SO, Sudarski S, Apfaltrer P and Walter T: Importance of risk factors for the evaluation of patients with a suspected pulmonary embolism. Exp Ther Med 9: 2281-2284, 2015
APA
Gruettner, J., Viergutz, T., Bolte, M., Henzler, T., Schoenberg, S.O., Sudarski, S. ... Walter, T. (2015). Importance of risk factors for the evaluation of patients with a suspected pulmonary embolism. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 9, 2281-2284. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2395
MLA
Gruettner, J., Viergutz, T., Bolte, M., Henzler, T., Schoenberg, S. O., Sudarski, S., Apfaltrer, P., Walter, T."Importance of risk factors for the evaluation of patients with a suspected pulmonary embolism". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 9.6 (2015): 2281-2284.
Chicago
Gruettner, J., Viergutz, T., Bolte, M., Henzler, T., Schoenberg, S. O., Sudarski, S., Apfaltrer, P., Walter, T."Importance of risk factors for the evaluation of patients with a suspected pulmonary embolism". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 9, no. 6 (2015): 2281-2284. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2395