Pioglitazone is an effective treatment for patients with post‑stroke depression combined with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Introduction

Post-stroke depression (PSD) is one of the most frequent neuropsychiatric diseases following a stroke (1). PSD occurs subsequent to the obvious symptoms of stroke. Patients diagnosed with PSD require the following two conditions: Evident clinical symptoms of stroke, and symptoms of depression following stroke (a patient must meet the diagnostic criteria for depression). The incidence of PSD is ~33% in all post-stroke patients (2). PSD has serious negative effects on individuals, family and society so its treatment is of great importance.

Pioglitazone, an agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) γ, is an antidiabetic drug of the thiazolidinedione class. PPARs mainly exist in insulin-targeted tissues, such as liver, fat and muscle tissues. They ameliorate blood glucose by reducing insulin resistance (3). A number of studies have reported that pioglitazone is effective in the treatment of depression (4–6); however, whether pioglitazone can ameliorate depressive symptoms in patients with PSD remains unknown. In the present study, pioglitazone was administered to patients with PSD and type 2 diabetes mellitus to examine whether pioglitazone can ameliorate the depressive symptoms in such patients.

Materials and methods

Ethics and consent

This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Binzhou Medical University Affiliated Hospital (Binzhou, China), and performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Enrolled patients provided informed consent.

Subjects

Between April 2012 and January 2014, consecutive patients with stroke who attended the stroke ward of Binzhou Medical University Affiliated Hospital were interviewed to assess PSD 3 months after the stroke. Patients were selected for inclusion in the present prospective, randomized controlled study if: i) They were aged ≥18 years; ii) brain magnetic resonance imaging + diffusion-weighted imaging revealed fresh infarctions following admission to the stroke ward; iii) fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels were ≥7.0 mmol/l twice following admission; iv) 6.5<glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)≤11%; v) the body mass index was ≥27 kg/m2; vi) the diagnosis of PSD (3 months subsequent to admission) fulfilled the criteria defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) (7); and vii) the activities of daily living (ADL) score was >50 points. Patients were excluded if i) the FBG level was <7.0 mmol/l following their stroke; ii) they had a history of vascular disease during the 5 years prior to the stroke; iii) their mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score was <24 points; iv) they had severe aphasia following their stroke; v) there was a history of psychiatric disease; vi) they had a medication history of the thiazolidinedione class; and vii) they received administration of other antidiabetic drugs but no insulin injections during the 3 months post-stroke.

Hypertension was diagnosed according to the following values: Systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg. Patients who took antihypertensive medications to control blood pressure were classed as being diagnosed with hypertension.

Clinical assessment and outcomes

The experimental group was given fluoxetine [20 mg once daily (qd)] and pioglitazone (30 mg qd) whilst the control group was given fluoxetine (20 mg qd) and metformin (0.5 g twice daily). The two groups were further divided into a mild and moderate (MM) depression and a severe depression group.

Baseline data collected from the patients included age, gender, family status, risk factors, MMSE score and National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) score. The following stroke risk factors were identified: i) Hypertension; ii) total cholesterol (TC); iii) high triglyceride levels (TG); iv) high low density lipoprotein (LDL) levels; v) high FBG levels; vi) high fasting insulin (FINS) levels; and vii) high HbA1c levels (8).

The patients were interviewed in order to evaluate their Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) and ADL scores. HAMD scores were assessed and administered by psychiatrists. Neurological physicians were responsible for the ADL, NIHSS and MMSE scores. The follow-up interview was conducted at an average of 3 months following the onset of stroke. The diagnosis of PSD was assessed according to DSM-IV (7). The HAMD scale was also used to simultaneously evaluate MM depression (23 points ≥ HAMD score ≥8 points) and severe depression (HAMD score ≥24 points) (9). ADL scores were also assessed at the onset of this interview. The severity of depression was evaluated by HAMD scores following 1 and 3 months of therapy. During the 3 months of therapy, the ADL scores and the levels of FBG and FINS were detected when the treatment was first initiated and at 1 and 3 month time-points.

Statistical analysis

The baseline assessment scores and demographic characteristics were analyzed by appropriate test procedures, including the independent sample t-test and the χ2 test. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare differences between the MM depression and the severe depression groups. Graphpad prism software (version 5.0; Graphpad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) was used for all statistical analyses. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

General and baseline characteristics

A total of 600 patients who had acute stroke combined with type 2 diabetes were enrolled in the present study. Of these 600 patients, 470 were excluded since they did not match the DSM-IV criteria and 12 had received antidiabetic drugs other than injected insulin during the 3 months following stroke onset. The remaining 118 patients were diagnosed with PSD according to DSM-IV. The MM depression group comprised 78 patients and the severe depression group comprised 40 patients. These patients were separately distributed into the pioglitazone and metformin subgroups. Each subgroup comprised 39 patients with MM depression and 20 patients with severe depression; however, in the pioglitazone subgroup, 4 patients with severe depression did not consistently take the drugs, and 3 patients with MM depression had a mild adverse drug response during the first month of therapy. Furthermore, the FBG and FINS levels of 2 patients with MM depression were not measured at the correct time during the 3-month therapy. In the metformin subgroup, 3 patients with severe depression did not consistently take the drugs during the first month of therapy, and the FBG and FINS data were lost for 2 patients with MM depression and 2 patients with severe depression after 1 month of therapy (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Flow chart showing the selection process of patients with PSD and type 2 diabetes mellitus. PSD, post-stroke depression; MM, mild and moderate depression; FBG, fasting blood glucose; FINS, fasting insulin.

No significant differences were observed between the pioglitazone and metformin subgroups regarding sociodemographic and baseline variables. Nevertheless, the severe depression group had higher NIHSS values than the MM depression group (F=8.328, P<0.0001; Tables I and II).

Table I. Sociodemographic and baseline scores of the pioglitazone and metformin groups on admission to the program.

Table I.

Sociodemographic and baseline scores of the pioglitazone and metformin groups on admission to the program.

Variable	Pioglitazone group (n=59)	Metformin group (n=59)	P-value
Agea (years)	63.85±6.58	65.36±7.89	0.2619
Gender (female %)	61	52.5	0.3528
Family status			0.6591
Single	2	4
Married	25	26
Divorced/widowed	32	29
Hypertension (n)	33	37	0.5742
TCa (mmol/l)	6.26±1.60	6.02±1.90	0.4613
TGa (mmol/l)	2.73±1.27	2.91±1.64	0.5075
LDLa (mmol/l)	3.92±1.19	3.60±1.30	0.1658
FBGa	9.27±1.71	8.85±1.72	0.1764
FINSa	12.20±2.69	11.43±2.85	0.1313
HbA1ca (%)	8.89±1.52	8.61±1.67	0.2676

a Presented as mean ± standard deviation; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; FBG, fasting blood glucose; FINS, fasting insulin; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin.

Table II. ADL and HAMD scores of the pioglitazone and metformin groups during 3 months of therapy.

Table II.

ADL and HAMD scores of the pioglitazone and metformin groups during 3 months of therapy.

	Pioglitazone group (n=59)		Metformin group (n=59)
Neuropsyciatric scores	MMDa	Severe Db	MMDc	Severe Dd	F-value	P-value
At 0 months
NIHSS	3.54±2.33	6.15±2.70	3.56±2.40	5.75±2.69	8.328	<0.0001
MMSE	26.31±1.45	26.55±1.54	26.79±1.64	26.45±1.43	0.6839	0.5636
ADL	74.10±9.38	62.75±8.35	72.44±7.68	60.75±7.83	16.95	<0.0001
HAMD	21.13±3.64	44.35±6.11	20.46±4.06	46.45±8.05	39.46	<0.0001
At 1 month
ADL	75.14±9.22	63.75±9.04	73.72±8.41	60.59±7.26	16.04	<0.0001
HAMD	17.86±4.05	41.63±6.10	19.74±3.35	43.59±7.67	112.6	<0.0001
At 3 months
ADL	77.94±8.35	64.06±9.87	75.14±10.31	63.00±7.97	14.47	<0.0001
HAMD	16.59±3.58	35.25±5.69	19.32±3.49	40.60±8.41	115.6	<0.0001

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn2-etm-0-0-2593'] } Scores are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

a n=39 at 0 months, 36 at 1 month and 34 at 3 months

b n=20 at 0 months and 16 at 1 and 3 months

c n=39 at 0 and 1 months and 37 at 3 months

d n=20 at 0 months, 17 at 1 month and 15 at 3 months. NIHSS, National Institutes of Health stroke scale; MMSE, mini mental state exam; ADL, activities of daily living; HAMD, Hamilton depression scale; MMD, mild and moderate depression; Severe D, severe depression.

At 1 month

In the MM depression group, the pioglitazone subgroup (n=36) had lower HAMD scores compared with the metformin subgroup (n=39) following 1 month of therapy (P=0.0302); however, no significant difference was observed in HAMD scores between the metformin subgroup (n=17) and the pioglitazone subgroup (n=16) in the severe depression group. The FINS levels of the pioglitazone group at 1 month (n=52) were lower than those at onset (n=59; P=0.0103); however, no such change in FINS levels was detected in the metformin group following 1 month of therapy. The FBG levels were observed to be stable in the pioglitazone and metformin groups (Figs. 2 and 3). No differences in ADL scores were observed between the pioglitazone and metformin groups, in either the MM depression or severe depression subgroups (Fig. 4).

Figure 2. FBG and FINS levels in the pioglitazone subgroup. No changes in FBG levels were found during 3 months of therapy in the pioglitazone subgroup. FINS levels detected following 1 month of therapy (n=52) were lower than those at the onset (n=59; *P=0.0103). FINS levels detected after 3 months of therapy (n=50) were lower than those detected after 1 month of therapy (n=52; **P=0.0246). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. FBG, fasting blood glucose; FINS, fasting insulin.

Figure 3. FBG and FINS levels in the metformin subgroup. No changes were found in the levels of FBG and FINS during 3 months of therapy. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. FBG, fasting blood glucose; FINS, fasting insulin.

Figure 4. ADL scores during the 3-month therapy period. The ADL score in the MM depression group was higher than that in the severe depression group; however, no difference was found between the pioglitazone and metformin subgroups of the MM depression and severe depression groups. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. ADL, activities of daily living; MM, mild to moderate depression;piog, pioglitazone; met, metformin.

At 3 months

In the severe depression group, HAMD scores were lower in the pioglitazone subgroup (n=16) than those in the metformin group (n=15) after 3 months of therapy (P=0.0457). A similar result was observed in the MM depression group (P=0.0017). In the pioglitazone group, the FINS levels detected following 3 months of therapy (n=50) were lower than those detected following 1 month of therapy (n=52; P=0.0246); however, no such change was exhibited in the metformin group. No difference in FBG level was observed in patients between 1 month of therapy and 3 months of therapy in the pioglitazone and metformin subgroups. ADL scores were also higher in the MM depression group compared with those in the severe depression group (F=14.47, P<0.0001, Table II). In the MM depression and severe depression groups, ADL scores showed no significant difference between the pioglitazone group and the metformin group after the 3 months therapy (Figs. 2–5).

Figure 5. HAMD scores during the 3-month therapy period. In the MM depression group, the pioglitazone subgroup (n=36) had lower HAMD scores than the metformin subgroup (n=39) following 1 month of therapy (*P=0.0302). In the MM depression (**P=0.0017) and severe depression groups (***P=0.0457), the pioglitazone subgroups (MM depression, n=34; severe depression, n=16) presented lower HAMD scores than the metformin subgroups (MM depression, n=37; severe depression, n=15) after 3 months of therapy. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. MM, mild to moderate depression; HAMD, Hamilton depression scale; piog, pioglitazone; met, metformin.

Discussion

The present study was, to the best of our knowledge, the first to examine the efficacy of pioglitazone using the HAMD scores of patients with PSD combined with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The antidepressive effects of pioglitazone were observed after 3 months of therapy. Pioglitazone ameliorated the depressive symptoms and decreased FINS levels whereas metformin did not; however, pioglitazone was useful for only MM depression following 1 month of treatment. After 3 months of treatment, pioglitazone was also effective against severe depression. The results suggest that pioglitazone may be useful for the treatment of patients with PSD combined with type 2 diabetes.

In the current study the morbidity of PSD was 19.7%, which did not correspond with a previous study describing the prevalence of PSD as 33.3% (2). The difference in results may be due to the fact that the patients selected in the present study were also diagnosed with type 2 diabetes; numerous inclusion criteria could also support this phenomenon. The present study was initiated 3 months following acute stroke as most studies report that the prevalence of PSD is highest during this period (10) enabling the recruitment of more patients in this period. The prevalence of PSD in female patients was 56.8% in this study, which is in accordance with a systematic review (11).

Kemp et al (5) reported a patient who had severe depression following 12 weeks of pioglitazone treatment with an initial dose of 15 mg qd and an end-point dose of 30 mg qd. In the study, a marked antidepressant response was demonstrated and a significant improvement in insulin resistance. In addition, Kemp et al (12) reported antidepressive effects and improvements in insulin sensitivity among 23 severe depression patients receiving pioglitazone therapy. Kashani et al (4), however, found that patients with severe depression and polycystic ovarian syndrome who took pioglitazone drugs had lower HAMD scores than patients who took metformin. No difference was found between the onset and end of therapy with respect to insulin resistance. Whether the antidepressive effect of pioglitazone is induced by the amelioration of insulin resistance remains unclear as different studies have reached different conclusions. Numerous studies have reported that pioglitazone can decrease the immobility time in the forced swimming test depression model, which cannot be explained by the amelioration of insulin resistance (13,14). This phenomenon was attributed to N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor signaling. In the present study, FINS levels gradually decreased in the pioglitazone subgroup, which demonstrates that pioglitazone decreased insulin resistance (homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance was calculated using the formula fasting plasma insulin (IU/l) × fasting plasma glucose (mmol/l)/22.5) (15). Depression could dysregulate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis causing the deposition of visceral fat, which could lead to insulin resistance (16). Visceral adipose tissue could also lead to inflammatory cytokine production, further contributing to impaired insulin signaling (17).

Few studies have compared the antidiabetic effects of pioglitazone and metformin. The TODAY Study Group found that pioglitazone combined with metformin is better than metformin alone when used on patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (18). This combination can stabilize blood glucose levels and improve insulin sensitivity. In the current study, no difference was found in FBG levels between the pioglitazone and metformin subgroups during 3 months of therapy. Patients with severe depression had higher NIHSS scores than patients with MM depression; thus, a patient would more easily succumb to severe depression if they had a more severe stroke. A similar trend was observed in ADL scores, in which the MM depression group had higher ADL scores than the severe depression group. Badaru et al (19) reported that PSD may have a passive effect on functional independence in ADL. In depressed or non-depressed patients the intake of antidepressant drugs within the first month post-stroke would be more likely to improve ADL scores than the intake of antidepressant drugs following the first month post-stroke (20). In this previous review, ADL scores were assessed from 6 months following a stroke to 24 months following a stroke. This observation had minimal association with the present results. No change was observed in ADL scores for the pioglitazone and metformin subgroups during the 3-month treatment period. The mechanism underlying this phenomenon should be explored in future studies.

The present study had several limitations. Firstly, the patients were diagnosed with PSD in accordance with DSM-IV 3 months after stroke; however, several patients suffered from depression between the first to third months following their stroke. This occurrence delayed the optimal therapy time. Secondly, patients with higher MMSE and ADL scores were selected in order for this study to proceed conveniently; thus, the sample population did not represent all patients with PSD. Thirdly, the HbA1c values of the patients were ≤11%; certain patients with higher HbA1c were excluded from this study. Finally, patients are recommended to be injected with insulin to control blood glucose levels during the acute stroke period. These patients took pioglitazone or metformin combined with insulin at the start of this project, and the insulin dosage may have varied from one individual to another.

Despite these limitations, the data suggest that pioglitazone can decrease depressive symptoms and improve insulin sensitivity compared with metformin. Although the mechanisms of this phenomenon remain unclear, the administration of pioglitazone to patients with PSD combined with type 2 diabetes mellitus may be considered to decrease their HAMD scores.

Acknowledgements

This study was partly supported by the Chinese State Natural Science Fund (No. 81301182).

References