1
|
Santesso N, Mustafa RA, Wiercioch W, Kehar
R, Gandhi S, Chen Y, Cheung A, Hopkins J, Khatib R, Ma B, et al:
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of benefits and harms of
cryotherapy, LEEP, and cold knife conization to treat cervical
intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 132:266–271.
2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
2
|
Wong AS, Li WH and Cheung TH: Predictive
factors for residual disease in hysterectomy specimens after
conization in early-stage cervical cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol
Reprod Biol. 199:21–26. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
3
|
Fallala MS and Mash R: Cervical cancer
screening: Safety, acceptability, and feasibility of a single-visit
approach in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med.
7:3–4. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar
|
4
|
Elit L, Levine MN, Julian JA, Sellors JW,
Lytwyn A, Chong S, Mahony JB, Gu C, Finch T and Zeferino LC:
Expectant management versus immediate treatment for low-grade
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomized trial in Canada
and Brazil. Cancer. 117:1438–1445. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
5
|
Song JS, Hwang I and Gong G: Outcome of
‘atypical squamous cells’ in cervical cytology: Follow-up
assessment by loop electrical excision procedure. Korean J Pathol.
46:359–364. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
6
|
Wu J, Jia Y, Luo M and Duan Z: Analysis of
residual/recurrent disease and its risk factors after loop
electrosurgical excision procedure for high-grade cervical
intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Obstet Invest. Sep 3–2015.(Epub
ahead of Print). View Article : Google Scholar
|
7
|
Liverani CA, Di Giuseppe J, Clemente N,
Delli Carpini G, Monti E, Fanetti F, Bolis G and Ciavattini A:
Length but not transverse diameter of the excision specimen for
high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2-3) is a
predictor of pregnancy outcome. Eur J Cancer Prev. Aug
27–2015.(Epub ahead of Print). View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
8
|
Ruano Y, Torrents M and Ferrer FJ: Human
papillomavirus combined with cytology and margin status identifies
patients at risk for recurrence after conization for high-grade
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol.
36:245–251. 2015.PubMed/NCBI
|
9
|
Malapati R, Chaparala S and Cejtin HE:
Factors influencing persistence or recurrence of cervical
intraepithelial neoplasia after loop electrosurgical excision
procedure. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 15:177–179. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
10
|
Monsonego J, Pintos J, Semaille C, Beumont
M, Dachez R, Zerat L, Bianchi A and Franco E: Human papillomavirus
testing improves the accuracy of colposcopy in detection of
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynecol Cancer.
16:591–598. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
11
|
Alvarez RD, Huh WK, Bae S, Lamb LS Jr,
Conner MG, Boyer J, Wang C, Hung CF, Sauter E, Paradis M, et al: A
pilot study of pNGVL4a-CRT/E7(detox) for the treatment of patients
with HPV16 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 (CIN2/3). Gynecol
Oncol. 140:245–252. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
12
|
Kang WD, Ju UC and Kim SM: A human
papillomavirus (HPV)-16 or HPV-18 genotype is a reliable predictor
of residual disease in a subsequent hysterectomy following a loop
electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial
neoplasia 3. J Gynecol Oncol. 27:e22016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
13
|
Kang WD and Kim SM: Human papillomavirus
genotyping as a reliable prognostic marker of recurrence after loop
electrosurgical excision procedure for high-grade cervical
intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2-3) especially in postmenopausal
women. Menopause. 23:81–86. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
14
|
Mo LZ, Song HL, Wang JL, He Q, Qiu ZC and
Li F: Pap smear combined with hpv testing: A reasonable tool for
women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treated by
LEEP. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 16:4297–4302. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|