Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and real-time elastography in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign thyroid nodules

Sui,Xin; Liu,Huai‑Jun; Jia,Hong‑Li; Fang,Qin‑Mao

doi:10.3892/etm.2016.3344

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and real-time elastography in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign thyroid nodules

Authors:
- Xin Sui
- Huai‑Jun Liu
- Hong‑Li Jia
- Qin‑Mao Fang
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Ultrasound, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050051, P.R. China, Department of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050050, P.R. China, Department of Radiology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050051, P.R. China
Published online on: May 17, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3344
Pages: 783-791

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) or real-time elastography (RTE) alone, as well as a combination of CEUS and RTE, in distinguishing benign from malignant thyroid nodules was investigated. Between August 2012 and June 2014, a total of 97 consecutive patients (50 male and 47 female patients; mean age, 48.6±12.4; age range, 27‑70 years) with thyroid nodules referred for surgical treatment were examined by CEUS and RTE. The final diagnosis was obtained based on histological findings. Image analysis of the CEUS and RTE scans was performed. Considering the postoperative pathological results as the golden standard, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed. Subsequently, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of CEUS alone, RTE alone and CEUS + RTE combination were calculated. Pathological examination showed 66 papillary carcinomas and 43 benign lesions, including 21 adenomas and 22 nodular goiters. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of CEUS were 81.82, 90.70, 93.10, 90.70 and 85.32%, respectively. In the case of RTE, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were 80.30, 88.37, 91.38, 88.37 and 83.49%, respectively. Furthermore, the combination of CEUS + RTE had a sensitivity of 95.45%, specificity of 95.35%, PPV of 96.92%, NPV of 95.35% and accuracy of 95.41%. Therefore, the CEUS + RTE combination showed a significantly higher sensitivity and specificity compared with CEUS or RTE alone (all P<0.05). Based on ROC analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) for CEUS, RTE and CEUS + RTE combination was 0.883, 0.863 and 0.959, respectively. The AUC of RTE alone was significantly lower compared with that of the CEUS + RTE combination. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that CEUS + RTE combination significantly increases the diagnostic performance for differential diagnosis of malignant and benign thyroid nodules compared with CEUS or RTE alone.

View Figures

View References

1	Dean DS and Gharib H: Epidemiology of thyroid nodules. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 22:901–911. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
2	La Vecchia C, Malvezzi M, Bosetti C, Garavello W, Bertuccio P, Levi F and Negri E: Thyroid cancer mortality and incidence: A global overview. Int J Cancer. 136:2187–2195. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
3	Vigneri R, Malandrino P and Vigneri P: The changing epidemiology of thyroid cancer: Why is incidence increasing? Curr Opin Oncol. 27:1–7. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
4	Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, Abraham J, Adair T, Aggarwal R, Ahn SY, et al: Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 380:2095–2128. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
5	Aschebrook-Kilfoy B, Ward MH, Sabra MM and Devesa SS: Thyroid cancer incidence patterns in the United States by histologic type, 1992–2006. Thyroid. 21:125–134. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
6	Chen W, Zheng R, Zeng H, Zhang S and He J: Annual report on status of cancer in China, 2011. Chin J Cancer Res. 27:2–12. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
7	Wang Y and Wang W: Increasing incidence of thyroid cancer in Shanghai, China, 1983–2007. Asia Pac J Public Health. 27:NP223–NP229. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
8	Morris LF, Ragavendra N and Yeh MW: Evidence-based assessment of the role of ultrasonography in the management of benign thyroid nodules. World J Surg. 32:1253–1263. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
9	Tamsel S, Demirpolat G, Erdogan M, Nart D, Karadeniz M, Uluer H and Ozgen AG: Power Doppler US patterns of vascularity and spectral Doppler US parameters in predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules. Clin Radiol. 62:245–251. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
10	Kim JY, Lee CH, Kim SY, Jeon WK, Kang JH, An SK and Jun WS: Radiologic and pathologic findings of nonpalpable thyroid carcinomas detected by ultrasonography in a medical screening center. J Ultrasound Med. 27:215–223. 2008.PubMed/NCBI
11	Algin O, Algin E, Gokalp G, Ocakoğlu G, Erdoğan C, Saraydaroglu O and Tuncel E: Role of duplex power Doppler ultrasound in differentiation between malignant and benign thyroid nodules. Korean J Radiol. 11:594–602. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
12	Iannuccilli JD, Cronan JJ and Monchik JM: Risk for malignancy of thyroid nodules as assessed by sonographic criteria: The need for biopsy. J Ultrasound Med. 23:1455–1464. 2004.PubMed/NCBI
13	Paschke R, Schmid KW, Gartner R, Mann K, Dralle H and Reiners C: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, guideline-adjusted diagnostics and treatment of thyroid nodules. Med Klin (Munich). 105:80–87. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
14	Russ G, Leboulleux S, Leenhardt L and Hegedüs L: Thyroid incidentalomas: Epidemiology, risk stratification with ultrasound and workup. Eur Thyroid J. 3:154–163. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
15	Moon WJ, Jung SL, Lee JH, Na DG, Baek JH, Lee YH, Kim J, Kim HS, Byun JS, Lee DH, et al: Benign and malignant thyroid nodules: US differentiation-multicenter retrospective study. Radiology. 247:762–770. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
16	Friedrich-Rust M, Sperber A, Holzer K, Diener J, Grünwald F, Badenhoop K, Weber S, Kriener S, Herrmann E, Bechstein WO, et al: Real-time elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the assessment of thyroid nodules. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 118:602–609. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
17	Wang Y, Dan HJ, Dan HY, Li T and Hu B: Differential diagnosis of small single solid thyroid nodules using real-time ultrasound elastography. J Int Med Res. 38:466–472. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
18	Minami Y and Kudo M: Ultrasound fusion imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: A review of current evidence. Dig Dis. 32:690–695. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
19	Yu D, Han Y and Chen T: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid lesions: Meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 151:909–915. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
20	Jiang J, Huang L, Zhang H, Ma W, Shang X, Zhou Q, Gao Y, Yu S and Qi Y: Contrast-enhanced sonography of thyroid nodules. J Clin Ultrasound. 43:153–156. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
21	Nemec U, Nemec SF, Novotny C, Weber M, Czerny C and Krestan CR: Quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound after intravenous administration of a microbubble contrast agent for differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: Assessment of diagnostic accuracy. Eur Radiol. 22:1357–1365. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
22	Agha A, Jung EM, Janke M, Hornung M, Georgieva M, Schlitt HJ, Schreyer AG, Strosczcynski C and Schleder S: Preoperative diagnosis of thyroid adenomas using high resolution contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 55:403–409. 2013.PubMed/NCBI
23	Deng J, Zhou P, Tian SM, Zhang L, Li JL and Qian Y: Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, acoustic radiation force impulse imaging and their combined use in differentiating focal solid thyroid nodules. PLoS One. 9:e906742014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
24	Kwak JY and Kim EK: Ultrasound elastography for thyroid nodules: Recent advances. Ultrasonography. 33:75–82. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
25	Şahin M, Çakal E, Özbek M, Güngünes A, Arslan MS, Akkaymak ET, Uçan B, Ünsal IÖ, Bozkurt NÇ and Delibaşi T: Elastography in the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules in Hashimoto thyroiditis. Med Oncol. 31:972014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
26	Menzilcioglu MS, Duymus M, Gungor G, Citil S, Sahin T, Boysan SN and Sarica A: The value of real-time ultrasound elastography in chronic autoimmune thyroiditis. Br J Radiol. 87:201406042014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
27	Cantisani V, Consorti F, Guerrisi A, Guerrisi I, Ricci P, Di Segni M, Mancuso E, Scardella L, Milazzo F, D'Ambrosio F and Antonaci A: Prospective comparative evaluation of quantitative-elastosonography (Q-elastography) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of thyroid nodules: Preliminary experience. Eur J Radiol. 82:1892–1898. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
28	M PN: World Medical Association publishes the Revised Declaration of Helsinki. Natl Med J India. 27:562014.PubMed/NCBI
29	Zhang B, Jiang YX, Liu JB, Yang M, Dai Q, Zhu QL and Gao P: Utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluation of thyroid nodules. Thyroid. 20:51–57. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
30	Zhou Q, Xu YB, Jiang J, Ma WQ, Wang H, Li M and Lei XY: Differential diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in calcified thyroid nodules. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 48:726–729. 2013.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI
31	Yuan WH, Chiou HJ, Chou YH, Hsu HC, Tiu CM, Cheng CY and Lee CH: Gray-scale and color Doppler ultrasonographic manifestations of papillary thyroid carcinoma: Analysis of 51 cases. Clin Imaging. 30:394–401. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
32	Stacul F, Bertolotto M, De Gobbis F, Calderan L, Cioffi V, Romano A, Zanconati F and Cova MA: US, colour-Doppler US and fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. Radiol Med. 112:751–762. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
33	Patel KV1, Huang DY1 and Sidhu PS1: Metachronous bilateral segmental testicular infarction: multi-parametric ultrasound imaging with grey-scale ultrasound, Doppler ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and real-time tissue elastography (RTE). J Ultrasound. 2014 May 31;17(3): 233–8. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
34	Zheng XJ, Zhang YK, Zhao CY, Shi XL, Li CS, Jiang JF, Wang H and Ye B: Diagnosis of thyroid space-occupying lesions using real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. 44:277–281. 2009.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI
35	Frey H: Realtime elastography. A new ultrasound procedure for the reconstruction of tissue elasticity. Radiologe. 43:850–855. 2003.(In German). View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
36	Jiang J, Shang X, Zhang H, Ma W, Xu Y, Zhou Q, Gao Y, Yu S and Qi Y: Correlation between maximum intensity and microvessel density for differentiation of malignant from benign thyroid nodules on contrast-enhanced sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 33:1257–1263. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
37	Bojunga J, Herrmann E, Meyer G, Weber S, Zeuzem S and Friedrich-Rust M: Real-time elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: A meta-analysis. Thyroid. 20:1145–1150. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
38	Argalia G, De Bernardis S, Mariani D, Abbattista T, Taccaliti A, Ricciardelli L, Faragona S, Gusella PM and Giuseppetti GM: Ultrasonographic contrast agent: Evaluation of time-intensity curves in the characterisation of solitary thyroid nodules. Radiol Med. 103:407–413. 2002.(In English, Italian). PubMed/NCBI
39	Dietrich CF, Saftoiu A and Jenssen C: Real time elastography endoscopic ultrasound (RTE-EUS), a comprehensive review. Eur J Radiol. 83:405–414. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
40	Lorentzen T and Skjoldbye B: Diagnosis and biopsy of liver metastases using ultrasound contrast agent. Ugeskr Laeger. 171:9072009.(In Danish). PubMed/NCBI
41	Aoyagi S, Izumi K, Hata H, Kawasaki H and Shimizu H: Usefulness of real-time tissue elastography for detecting lymph-node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Exp Dermatol. 34:e744–e747. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
42	Sugitani I, Kasai N, Fujimoto Y and Yanagisawa A: A novel classification system for patients with PTC: Addition of the new variables of large (3 cm or greater) nodal metastases and reclassification during the follow-up period. Surgery. 135:139–148. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
43	Sugitani I, Fujimoto Y, Yamada K and Yamamoto N: Prospective outcomes of selective lymph node dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma based on preoperative ultrasonography. World J Surg. 32:2494–2502. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI