|
1
|
Noguchi M, Yokoi-Noguchi M, Ohno Y,
Morioka E, Nakano Y, Kosaka T and Kurita T: Oncoplastic breast
conserving surgery: volume replacement vs. volume displacement. Eur
J Surg Oncol. 4:10–11. 2016.
|
|
2
|
Wu X, Lin Q, Lu J, Chen G, Zeng YI, Lin Y,
Chen Y, Wang Y and Yan J: Comparison of mammography and ultrasound
in detecting residual disease following bioptic lumpectomy in
breast cancer patients. Mol Clin Oncol. 4:419–424. 2016.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Xu N, Lei Z, Li XL, Zhang J, Li C, Feng
GQ, Li DN, Liu JY, Wei Q, Bian TT, et al: Clinical study of tumor
angiogenesis and perfusion imaging using multi-slice spiral
computed tomography for breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev.
14:429–433. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Morrow M: Magnetic resonance imaging for
screening, diagnosis, and eligibility for breast-conserving
surgery: promises and pitfalls. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 19:475–492.
2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Resende LM, Matias MA, Oliveira GM, Salles
MA, Melo FH and Gobbi H: [Evaluation of breast microcalcifications
according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) and
Le Gal's classifications]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 30:75–79. 2008.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Benndorf M, Wu Y and Burnside ES: A
history of breast cancer and older age allow risk stratification of
mammographic BI-RADS 3 ratings in the diagnostic setting. Clin
Imaging. 40:200–204. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Jeffries DO, Neal CH, Noroozian M, Joe AI,
Pinsky RW, Goodsitt MM and Helvie MA: Surgical biopsy is still
necessary for BI-RADS 4 calcifications found on digital mammography
that are technically too faint for stereotactic core biopsy. Breast
Cancer Res Treat. 154:557–561. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Han XJ, Ren JH, Ma N, Tan QT and Wang SY:
The study in detection of microcalcification in early breast cancer
by ultrasound and its correlation with pathohistology. Zhonghua Yi
Xue Za Zhi. 92:2349–2352. 2012.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Chammings F, Chopier J, Mathelin C and
Chéreau E: Explorations of breast microcalcifications: guidelines.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 44:960–969. 2015.(In French).
PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Warren LM, Green FH, Shrestha L, Mackenzie
A, Dance DR and Young KC: Validation of simulation of
calcifications for observer studies in digital mammography. Phys
Med Biol. 58:N217–N228. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Mantas D and Markopoulos C: Screening
mammography: usefulness beyond early detection of breast cancer.
Atherosclerosis. 248:12016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Cai SQ, Yan JX, Chen QS, Huang ML and Cai
DL: Significance and application of digital breast tomosynthesis
for the BI-RADS classification of breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer
Prev. 16:4109–4114. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Enokido K, Watanabe C, Nakamura S, Ogiya
A, Osako T, Akiyama F, Yoshimura A, Iwata H, Ohno S, Kojima Y, et
al: Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in
patients with an initial diagnosis of cytology-proven lymph
node-positive breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. Feb 11–2016.(Epub
ahead of print). View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
Tozaki M, Kawakami M, Suzuki M, Uchida K,
Yamashita A and Fukuda K: Diagnosis of Tis/T1 breast cancer extent
by multislice helical CT: a novel classification of tumor
distribution. Radiat Med. 21:187–192. 2003.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Brennan M, Spillane A and Houssami N: The
role of breast MRI in clinical practice. Aust Fam Physician.
38:513–519. 2009.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Silbergeld JJ,
Eby PR, Peacock S, Javid SH and Lehman CD: High cancer yield and
positive predictive value: outcomes at a center routinely using
preoperative breast MRI for staging. AJR Am J Roentgenol.
196:W93–W99. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Biglia N, Bounous VE, Martincich L,
Panuccio E, Liberale V, Ottino L, Ponzone R and Sismondi P: Role of
MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) versus conventional imaging for
breast cancer presurgical staging in young women or with dense
breast. Eur J Surg Oncol. 37:199–204. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
den Hartogh MD, Philippens ME, van Dam IE,
Kleynen CE, Tersteeg RJ, Pijnappel RM, Kotte AN, Verkooijen HM, van
den Bosch MA, van Vulpen M, van Asselen B and van den Bongard HD:
MRI and CT imaging for preoperative target volume delineation in
breast-conserving therapy. Radiat Oncol. 9:632014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
