Comparative study on the biomechanics between improved PVP and traditional PKP in the treatment of vertebral peripheral wall damage-type OVCF

Zhou,Tao; Lin,Hao; Wang,Hongliang; Chen,Xiaoqiang; He,Fang

doi:10.3892/etm.2017.4542

Comparative study on the biomechanics between improved PVP and traditional PKP in the treatment of vertebral peripheral wall damage-type OVCF

Authors:
- Tao Zhou
- Hao Lin
- Hongliang Wang
- Xiaoqiang Chen
- Fang He
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Orthopaedics, The People's Hospital of Maanshan, Maanshan, Anhui 243000, P.R. China, Clinical College of Maanshan, Anhui Medical University, Maanshan, Anhui 243000, P.R. China
Published online on: June 1, 2017 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2017.4542
Pages: 575-580
Copyright: © Zhou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

We compared the biomechanics between improved percutaneous vertebroplasty (improved PVP) and traditional percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in the treatment of vertebral peripheral wall damage-type osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF). A total of 15 vertebral peripheral wall damage-type OVCF models of new calves (12-14 weeks) were treated with a decalcifying agent (Shandon TBD-1) with the vertebral compression fracture. The vertebral volume and anterior height before modeling, and the vertebral BMD before and after modeling were measured. The models were randomly divided into three groups: the improved PVP group (Group A), the traditional PKP group (Group B) and the control group (Group C). BMD of Groups A, B and C after decalcification was significantly lower than that before decalcification (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in BMD before and after decalcification among Groups A, B and C (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the initial strength and stiffness among the three groups (P>0.05). The postoperative strength of Groups A and B was 1.036±300 and 1.045±200 N, respectively, which was significantly higher than the initial strength (P<0.05). The postoperative stiffness of Groups A and B was 395±250 and 470±270 N/mm, respectively, which was slightly lower than the initial stiffness, however, the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). In the comparison of postoperative strength and stiffness between Groups A and B, the postoperative strength in Group A was lower than that in Group B; differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05); there was no significant difference in the postoperative stiffness between Groups A and B (P>0.05). There were no significant differences of injection of bone cement between the two groups (P>0.05). Therefore, an improved PVP can basically realize the curative effects of traditional PKP in the treatment of vertebral peripheral wall damage-type OVCF, which can be used as clinical reference.

View Figures

View References

1	Melton LJ and Kallmes DF: Epidemiology of vertebral fractures: Implications for vertebral augmentation. Acad Radio1. 13:538–545. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar
2	Oldenhuis CN, Oosting SF, Gietema JA and de Vries EG: Prognostic versus predictive value of biomarkers in oncology. Eur J Cancer. 44:946–953. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
3	Tseng YY, Lo YL, Chen LH, Lai PL and Yang ST: Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of pain induced by metastatic spine tumor. Surg Neurol. 70 Suppl 1:S78–S83. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar
4	Taylor RS, Taylor RJ and Fritzell P: Balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures: A comparative systematic review of efficacy and safety. Spine. 31:2747–2755. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
5	Azorit C, Hervas J, Analla M, Carrasco R and Muñoz-Cobo J: Histological thin-sections: A method for the microscopic study of teeth in Spanish red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus). Anat Histol Embryol. 31:224–227. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
6	Tomita S, Kin A, Yazu M and Abe M: Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty with calcium phosphate cement in a simulated osteoporotic compression fracture. J Orthop Sci. 8:192–197. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
7	Boonen S, Wahl DA, Nauroy L, Brandi ML, Bouxsein ML, Goldhahn J, Lewiecki EM, Lyritis GP, Marsh D, Obrant K, et al CSA Fracture Working Group of International Osteoporosis Foundation, : Balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in the management of vertebral compression fractures. Osteoporos Int. 22:2915–2934. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
8	Watts NB, Harris ST and Genant HK: Treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures with percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Osteoporos Int. 12:429–437. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
9	Mathis JM: Percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty: Which one do I choose? Skeletal Radiol. 35:629–631. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
10	Lamy O, Uebelhart B and Aubry-Rozier B: Risks and benefits of percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty in the management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int. 25:807–819. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
11	Zhao G, Liu X and Li F: Balloon kyphoplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Osteoporos Int. 27:2823–2834. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
12	Anselmetti GC, Muto M, Guglielmi G and Masala S: Percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Radiol Clin North Am. 48:641–649. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
13	Seven A, Yuksel B, Kucur S Kabil, Yavuz G, Polat M, Unlu BS and Keskin N: The evaluation of hormonal and psychological parameters that affect bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 20:20–25. 2016.PubMed/NCBI
14	Cho AR, Kim HK, Kwon JY, Kim TK, Choi YM and Kim KH: The incorporation of platelet-rich plasma into calcium phosphate cement enhances bone regeneration in osteoporosis. Pain Physician. 17:E737–E745. 2014.PubMed/NCBI
15	Gao J, Mi S and Liu C: Treatment of various kinds of osteoporotic vertebral fracture with vertebral plasty. Chin J Bone Jt Inj. 24:35–37. 2009.(In Chinese).
16	Colangelo D, Nasto LA, Genitiempo M, Formica VM, Autore G, Pambianco V, Tamburrelli FC, Cerulli G and Pola E: Kyphoplasty vs conservative treatment: a case-control study in 110 post-menopausal women population. Is kyphoplasty better than conservative treatment? Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 19:3998–4003. 2015.PubMed/NCBI
17	Zarrinkalam MR, Beard H, Schultz CG and Moore RJ: Validation of the sheep as a large animal model for the study of vertebral osteoporosis. Eur Spine J. 18:244–253. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
18	Nayak S, Olkin I, Liu H, Grabe M, Gould MK, Allen IE, Owens DK and Bravata DM: Meta-analysis: Accuracy of quantitative ultrasound for identifying patients with osteoporosis. Ann Intern Med. 144:832–841. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
19	Egermann M, Goldhahn J and Schneider E: Animal models for fracture treatment in osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 16 Suppl 2:S129–S138. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
20	Nakagi Y, Ito T, Hirooka K, Sugioka Y, Endo H, Saijo Y, Imai H, Takeda H, Kayama F, Sasaki S, et al: Association between lifestyle habits and bone mineral density in Japanese juveniles. Environ Health Prev Med. 15:222–228. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
21	Kilincer C, Inceoglu S, Sohn MJ, Ferrara LA, Bakirci N and Benzel EC: Load sharing within a human thoracic vertebral body: An in vitro biomechanical study. Turk Neurosurg. 17:167–177. 2007.PubMed/NCBI
22	Giro G, Gonçalves D, Sakakura CE, Pereira RM, Marcantonio E Júnior and Orrico SR: Influence of estrogen deficiency and its treatment with alendronate and estrogen on bone density around osseointegrated implants: Radiographic study in female rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 105:162–167. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
23	Shirke SS, Jadhav SR and Jagtap AG: Methanolic extract of Cuminum cyminum inhibits ovariectomy induced bone loss in rats. Exp Biol Med. 233:1403–1410. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar
24	Martin-Monge E, Tresguerres IF, Blanco L, Khraisat A, Rodríguez-Torres R and Tresguerres JA: Validation of an osteoporotic animal model for dental implant analyses: An in vivo densitometric study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 26:725–730. 2011.PubMed/NCBI
25	Fyhrie DP and Vashishth D: Bone stiffness predicts strength similarly for human vertebral cancellous bone in compression and for cortical bone in tension. Bone. 26:169–173. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI