|
1
|
Takagi I, Eliyas JK and Stadlan N:
Cervical spondylosis: An update on pathophysiology, clinical
manifestation, and management strategies. Dis Mon. 57:583–591.
2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Nagamoto Y, Ishii T, Sakaura H, Iwasaki M,
Moritomo H, Kashii M, Hattori T, Yoshikawa H and Sugamoto K: In
vivo three-dimensional kinematics of the cervical spine during head
rotation in patients with cervical spondylosis. Spine (Phila Pa
1976). 36:778–783. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Miyazaki M, Hong SW, Yoon SH, Zou J, Tow
B, Alanay A, Abitbol JJ and Wang JC: Kinematic analysis of the
relationship between the grade of disc degeneration and motion unit
of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 33:187–193. 2008.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Yuan W, Zhu Y, Liu X, Zhu H, Zhou X, Zhou
R, Cui C and Li J: Postoperative three-dimensional cervical range
of motion and neurological outcomes in patients with cervical
ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Cervical
laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion. Clin Neurol Neurosurg.
134:17–23. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Bogduk N and Mercer S: Biomechanics of the
cervical spine I: Normal kinematics. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon).
15:633–648. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Maksymowych WP, Mallon C, Richardson R,
Conner-Spady B, Jauregui E, Chung C, Zappala L, Pile K and Russell
AS: Development and validation of a simple tape-based measurement
tool for recording cervical rotation in patients with ankylosing
spondylitis: Comparison with a goniometer-based approach. J
Rheumatol. 33:2242–2249. 2006.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Lachtman DS, Bartha DA, Beltran MM,
Dominguez DN, Messerli AR, Miller SE, Davis AM and Nelson-Wong E:
Rater reliability and concurrent validity of single and dual bubble
inclinometry to assess cervical lateral flexion. J Manipulative
Physiol Ther. 38:572–580. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Dvorák J, Panjabi MM, Grob D, Novotny JE
and Antinnes JA: Clinical validation of functional
flexion/extension radiographs of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila
Pa 1976). 18:120–127. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Williams MA, Williamson E, Gates S and
Cooke MW: Reproducibility of the cervical range of motion (CROM)
device for individuals with sub-acute whiplash associated
disorders. Eur Spine J. 21:872–878. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Jordan K, Dziedzic K, Jones PW, Ong BN and
Dawes PT: The reliability of the three-dimensional FASTRAK
measurement system in measuring cervical spine and shoulder range
of motion in healthy subjects. Rheumatology (Oxford). 39:382–388.
2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Cagnie B, Cools A, De Loose V, Cambier D
and Danneels L: Reliability and normative database of the Zebris
cervical range-of-motion system in healthy controls with
preliminary validation in a group of patients with neck pain. J
Manipulative Physiol Ther. 30:450–455. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Bulgheroni MV, Antonaci F, Ghirmai S,
Sandrini G, Nappi G and Pedotti A: A 3D kinematic method for
evaluating voluntary movements of the cervical spine in humans.
Funct Neurol. 13:239–245. 1998.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Exell TA, Gittoes MJ, Irwin G and Kerwin
DG: Gait asymmetry: Composite scores for mechanical analyses of
sprint running. J Biomech. 45:1108–1111. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
Delahunt E, Cusack K, Wilson L and Doherty
C: Joint mobilization acutely improves landing kinematics in
chronic ankle instability. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 45:514–519. 2013.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Levanon Y, Gefen A, Lerman Y, Givon U and
Ratzon NZ: Validity and reliability of upper extremity
three-dimensional kinematics during a typing task. Gait Posture.
32:469–474. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
O'Sullivan K, Clifford A and Hughes L: The
reliability of the CODA motion analysis system for lumbar spine
analysis: A pilot study. Physiotherapy Pract Res. 31:16–22.
2010.
|
|
17
|
Williams MA, McCarthy CJ, Chorti A, Cooke
MW and Gates S: A systematic review of reliability and validity
studies of methods for measuring active and passive cervical range
of motion. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 33:138–155. 2010.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A and
Buckingham B: The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio
scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain. 17:45–56.
1983. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, Kikuchi S,
Konno S, Miyamoto M, Seichi A, Shimamura T, Shirado O, Taguchi T,
et al: Japanese orthopaedic association cervical myelopathy
evaluation questionnaire (JOACMEQ): Part 2. Endorsement of the
alternative item. J Orthop Sci. 12:241–248. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Stratford PW and Goldsmith CH: Use of the
standard error as a reliability index of interest: An applied
example using elbow flexor strength data. Phys Ther. 77:745–750.
1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Katz JN and
Wright JG: A taxonomy for responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol.
54:1204–1217. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22
|
Bland JM and Altman DG: Agreed statistics:
Measurement method comparison. Anesthesiology. 116:182–185. 2012.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Shrout PE: Measurement reliability and
agreement in psychiatry. Stat Methods Med Res. 7:301–317. 1998.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Nussbaumer S, Leunig M, Glatthorn JF,
Stauffacher S, Gerber H and Maffiuletti NA: Validity and
test-retest reliability of manual goniometers for measuring passive
hip range of motion in femoroacetabular impingement patients. BMC
Musculoskelet Disord. 11:1942010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Law EY and Chiu TT: Measurement of
cervical range of motion (CROM) by electronic CROM goniometer: A
test of reliability and validity. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil.
26:141–148. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
26
|
Dvir Z, Gal-Eshel N, Shamir B, Prushansky
T, Pevzner E and Peretz C: Cervical motion in patients with chronic
disorders of the cervical spine: A reproducibility study. Spine
(Phila Pa 1976). 31:E394–E399. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
27
|
Cattrysse E, Moens M, Schaillée E, D'Haens
J and Van Roy P: Changed cervical kinematics after fusion surgery.
Eur Spine J. 21:1353–1359. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
28
|
Bell KM, Bechara BP, Hartman RA, Shively
C, Frazier EC, Lee JY, Kang JD and Donaldson WF: Influence of
number of operated levels and postoperative time on active range of
motion following anterior cervical decompression and fusion
procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 36:263–268. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
29
|
Quek J, Brauer SG, Treleaven J, Pua YH,
Mentiplay B and Clark RA: Validity and intra-rater reliability of
an android phone application to measure cervical range-of-motion. J
Neuroeng Rehabil. 11:652014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
30
|
Shahidi B, Johnson CL, Curran-Everett D
and Maluf KS: Reliability and group differences in quantitative
cervicothoracic measures among individuals with and without chronic
neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 13:2152012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
31
|
Lee SH, Lee JC, Tauchi R and Daniel Riew
K: Influence of the number of cervical fusion levels on cervical
spine motion and health-related quality of life. Spine (Phila Pa
1976). 41:E474–E480. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
32
|
Chien A, Lai DM, Wang SF, Cheng CH, Hsu WL
and Wang JL: Differential segmental motion contribution of single-
and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Eur Spine J.
24:2857–2865. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
33
|
Mao N, Wu J, Zhang Y, Gu X, Wu Y, Lu C,
Ding M, Lv R, Li M and Shi Z: A comparison of anterior cervical
corpectomy and fusion combined with artificial disc replacement and
cage fusion in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic
myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 40:1277–1283. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
34
|
Landers MR, Addis KA, Longhurst JK, Vom
Steeg BL, Puentedura EJ and Daubs MD: Anterior cervical
decompression and fusion on neck range of motion, pain and
function: A prospective analysis. Spine J. 13:1650–1658. 2013.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
35
|
Takasaki H, Hall T, Oshiro S, Kaneko S,
Ikemoto Y and Jull G: Normal kinematics of the upper cervical spine
during the Flexion-Rotation Test-In vivo measurements using
magnetic resonance imaging. Man Ther. 16:167–171. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
36
|
Rudolfsson T, Björklund M and Djupsjöbacka
M: Range of motion in the upper and lower cervical spine in people
with chronic neck pain. Man Ther. 17:53–59. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
