Congenital anomalies in infants conceived by infertile women through assisted reproductive technology: A cohort study 2004‑2014

  • Authors:
    • Ying Han
    • Haining Luo
    • Yunshan Zhang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: August 3, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6572
  • Pages: 3179-3185
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

This retrospective cohort study aimed to analyse the risk of congenital anomalies (CAs) in infants conceived by infertile women through assisted reproductive technology (ART). A total of 9,013 clinical pregnancy cycles resulting in 9,101 live births between 2004 and 2014 were analysed. Congenital anomalies were evaluated and compared with spontaneous pregnancies in infertile women. A total of 9,101 infants were born following ART. Three subgroups were established: In vitro fertilisation fresh embryo transfer (IVF‑ET), n=2,919, intracytoplasmic sperm injection fresh embryo transfer (ICSI), n=1,996 and frozen‑thawed embryo transfer (FET), n=4,186. No significant differences in perinatal outcomes were observed between the three subgroups. A total of 105 (1.15%) infants were born with CAs. The birth defect rate was slightly higher in the IVF‑ET subgroup compared with the other subgroups. Among infants in the IVF‑ET and ICSI‑ET subgroup, the probability of birth defects increased with increased maternal age (>35 years), male factors and diminished ovarian reserve. In the FET group, the risk of birth defects was significantly increased with multiple births and maternal age >35 years. The risk of congenital anomalies following ART was not significantly different compared with spontaneous conceptions within the infertile study population. The results of the present study may provide guidance for patients who are considering treatment for infertility in China.

Introduction

The association between assisted reproductive technology (ART) and the risk of birth defects has previously been re reported (14). Patients undergoing conventional in vitro fertilization fresh-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycles often do not achieve fertilization (5). Total fertilization failure (TFF) increases the financial costs of an already stressful and expensive treatment plan and may result in further emotional strain on such patients (5). With frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET), it is unclear whether the cryoprotectant, freezing or thawing procedures will have an adverse effect on the embryos and thereby increase the risk of major congenital anomalies (CAs) compared with ET procedures (6). Despite recent improvements in ART, it has been reported that TFF or near-TFF occurs in 15–20% of patients undergoing conventional IVF-ET cycles (7).

The number of children conceived through ART is now >5 million, and so determining whether there is an association between ART and birth defects is of great importance (8). It has previously been reported that maternal factors associated with infertility may in increase the risk of birth defects (9,10), or that an inherent defect responsible for infertility may also cause birth defects in the conceived child (11).

The aim of the present study was to retrospectively analyse ART data from 2004 to 2014 to determine whether CA rates are increased in infants conceived by infertile women via ART compared with those conceived by spontaneous conception (SC).

Materials and methods

Patients

The present study is a register-based cohort study. Women who underwent ART treatment, including IVF-ET, intracytoplasmic sperm injection fresh embryo transfer (ICSI) and FET, resulting in live birth between 2004 and 2014 were recruited from the Reproductive Medicine Centre of Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology Tianjin, China). Inclusion criteria included patients exhibited a normal karyotype, normal levels endocrine hormone. Mean age of the patients was 31.56±4.34. All the recruited patients were contacted by telephone. If patients could not be reached by telephone, they were excluded from the study. A team of professional training nurses assessed the course and the outcome of pregnancies via a telephone questionnaire and direct contact at one week post-partum. Direct consultations with obstetricians, paediatricians or ultrasound technicians were sought in all cases where an anomaly was suspected during conception. In total, 9,101 births after embryo transfer were assessed in the present study, including 4,186 births resulting from FET and 4,915 births resulting from IVF/ICSI-ET. All patients provided written informed consent and provided information regarding TFF and follow-up, including neonatal outcomes. The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Clinical procedures and embryo transfer

All patients participating in this study underwent controlled ovarian stimulation according to routine long or short gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocols (12). Pituitary suppression was achieved by daily subcutaneous injections of triptorelin acetate (100 µg; Ferring Pharmaceuticals Ltd., West Drayton, United Kingdom) initiated at the mid-luteal phase of the preceding cycle. The treating physician opted to use the GnRH agonist (3,978 patients) or antagonist (937 patients) protocol on the basis of patient characteristics or ovarian response during previous IVF cycles. The ovarian response during treatment was monitored by measuring serum E2 concentration and follicular growth (using vaginal ultrasound). Dosages of follicle-stimulating hormone and human menopausal gonadotropin were adjusted accordingly between 75 IU/day and 150 IU/day. Recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG; 5,000-10,000 IU/day; Lizhu Pharmacy, Zhuhai, China) was administered to trigger ovulation when two leading follicles reached a mean diameter of 18 mm measured by vaginal ultrasound. Oocyte retrieval was performed transvaginally 34–36 h following hCG administration. Oocytes were fertilized using IVF-ET or ICSI according to sperm quality. Sperm preparation, IVF-ET, ICSI and embryo culture were performed as previously described (7,12). Semen samples were collected by masturbation following 2–7 days of sexual abstinence. Samples were stored at 37°C for 30 min for liquefaction, following which they were analysed for sperm count, motility and morphology according to World Health Organization criteria (13). During IVF-ET cycles, each oocyte was inseminated with 10,000 motile spermatozoa 3–4 h following retrieval. Patients whose partners were identified as having severe oligospermia or azoospermia in previous IVF-ET cycles received ICSI. During ICSI cycles, cumulus cells and the corona radiata of the oocytes were removed by exposure to HYASE (Vitrolife AB, Goteborg, Sweden) containing hyaluronidase for 10–15 sec at 2 h following retrieval. ICSI was performed on metaphase II oocytes as determined by observation under an inverted microscope (magnification, ×200). The presence of two pronuclei was defined as normal fertilization and fertilized oocytes. All cells were grown in an incubator with a constant temperature of 37°C and 5% CO2, and continuously cultured in G1 medium (Vitrolife AB) for 2 days. All embryos from IVF-ET and ICSI were examined on the morning of day 3 following oocyte retrieval (~69 h after initial insemination). Every embryo was graded on the basis of the regularity of blastomeres and degree of DNA fragmentation: Grade 1, the sizes of the blastomeres were uniform, with no DNA fragmentation; grade 2, the blastomere sizes were slightly uneven with <20% DNA fragmentation; grade 3, the blastomere sizes were heterogeneous or DNA fragmentation was 20–50%; and grade 4, >50% DNA fragmentation. Good-quality embryos were defined as embryos with a grade of 1 or 2 (14). Only good quality embryos and ordinary quality embryos were selected for transfer (15). Typically, the two best-quality embryos were chosen for transfer on day 3, while surplus embryos of good or fair quality were cryopreserved or extensively cultured to the blastocyst stage for possible cryopreservation according to the protocol developed by Chinese legislation (16). From 2008 onwards, vitrification was used for embryo cryopreservation at this centre. Briefly, the embryos were equilibrated in equilibration medium [basal medium with 7.5% (v/v) ethylene glycol and 7.5% (v/v) dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO)] at room temperature for 10 min. The embryos were then transferred into the vitrification medium [basal medium with 15% (v/v) ethylene glycol, 15% (v/v) DMSO and 0.5 mol/l sucrose] at room temperature for 60 sec. The cryoprotectant-treated embryos were placed onto a fine Cryotop® (Kitazato BioPharma Co., Fuji, Japan) and then submerged immediately into liquid nitrogen ready for storage.

FET cycles were initiated during natural cycles following spontaneous ovulation as well as hormone replacement treatment (HRT) cycles. For the natural cycles, transvaginal ultrasound scans were performed on cycle days 10–12 to assess endometrial thickness, follicle growth and ovulation. FET was planned for 3 days after ovulation. Progesterone administration was initiated for luteal support 1 day after ovulation. For the HRT cycles, oral oestradiol (Progynova; Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany) was administered at a dosage of 2 mg/day on cycle days 1–4, 4 mg/day on cycle days 5–8 and 6 mg/day on cycle days 9–12. Transvaginal ultrasounds were performed to assess endometrial thickness and ovulation at day 13 and the oestradiol dosage was adjusted accordingly. When the endometrium reached ≥8 mm thickness, 40 mg of progesterone (Zhejiang Xianju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Zhejiang, China) was administered intramuscularly. For the next 3 days, 60, 80 and 80 mg/day of progesterone was intramuscularly administered, respectively, as performed previously (17). Embryo transfer was performed on day 4.

Outcome measures

Serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) was used to detect pregnancy 2 weeks after embryo transfer or 10 days after blastocyst transfer and was subsequently tested serially to monitor rising titres. Clinical pregnancy was defined as the presence of a gestational sac with foetal heart activity on ultrasound examination 5 weeks following oocyte retrieval. The implantation rate was defined as the number of gestational sacs per total number of transferred embryos (18). Neonatal outcome data were obtained by telephone interviews with parents following delivery. A questionnaire was used to obtain information of 9,013 clinical pregnancy cycles on gestational weeks, birth weight, sex and CAs. CAs were defined as all structural, functional and genetic anomalies diagnosed in aborted foetuses, at birth or during the neonatal period (19). CAs were classified and coded according to an extended version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) (20). Only cases with major CAs were included in the analysis and were categorized by organ system classification according to the ICD-10. Each organ system involved was recorded once per infant, however infants with multiple major anomalies may appear in several different groups depending on the affected organ systems. In addition, a concern with FET is often whether the cryoprotectants, freezing or thawing procedures have an adverse effect on the embryos and whether, thereby, cryopreservation processes increase the risk of major CAs (6). Therefore, only certain associated factors were analyzed during the FET process and certain characteristics of patients were not included.

Statistical analysis

Data were analysed using SPSS version 19.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Parental reproductive and ART treatment parameters, maternal characteristics and pregnancy and birth outcomes in IVF-ET and FET groups were compared using Student's t tests for continuous variables and χ2 tests for categorical variables. Statistical analysis using univariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between maternal age, infertility diagnosis, plurality and the risk of CAs in the FET group. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Pregnancy outcomes

The final sample population included 9,013 clinical pregnancy cycles resulting in 9,101 live births (IVF-ET, n=2,919; ICSI, n=1,996; FET, n=4,186). A total of 105 infants were born with CAs (Table I). In the ART subgroups, birth defects occurred in 37 infants conceived through IVF-ET (1.27%), 22 infants conceived through ICSI (1.10%) and 46 infants conceived through FET (1.10%). The birth defect rate was slightly higher in the IVF-ET subgroup compared with the other sub groups, however no significant difference was observed (Table I). For multiple births, the birth defect rate was slightly lower in the FET subgroup compared with the IVF-ET subgroup. For all subgroups, the birth defect rate in infants conceived by mothers aged >35 years was slightly but not significantly higher compared with those with mothers aged ≤35 years. The organ system distribution of birth defects is presented in Table II.

Table I.

CA rates for live-born infants.

Table I.

CA rates for live-born infants.

Babies born with CAs (% of total in group)

ParameterIVF-ETICSIFETχ2P-value
Total37 (1.27)22 (1.10)46 (1.10)0.4880.783
Sex
  Male20 (1.27)15 (1.51)25 (1.14)0.7310.694
  Female17 (1.26)7 (0.70)21 (1.05)1.8040.406
Plurality
  Single20 (1.20)16 (1.34)34 (1.58)1.0250.599
  Multiple17 (1.36)6 (0.75)12 (0.59)5.5020.064
Maternal age
  >35 years13 (2.60)4 (1.33)15 (2.97)2.1820.336
  <35 years24 (0.99)18 (1.06)31 (0.84)0.7170.699

[i] CA, congenital abnormality; IVF-ET, in vitro fertilization fresh embryo transfer; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; FET, frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

Table II.

Types of congenital abnormalities among live-born infants.

Table II.

Types of congenital abnormalities among live-born infants.

ICD10 codeTotal, n (%)IVF-ET, nICSI, nFET, n
Q00-Q07 central nervous system7 (6.1)412
Q10-Q18 eye, ear, face and neck2 (1.7)200
Q20-Q28 cardiovascular and circulation46 (40.1)17920
Q30-Q34 respiratory1 (0.8)100
Q35-Q37 cheilopalatognathus12 (10.2)138
Q38-Q45 gastrointestinal14 (12.1)626
Q50-Q64 genitourinary system7 (6.1)313
Q65-Q79 musculoskeletal11 (9.3)533
Q80-Q89 other4 (3.4)022
Q90-Q99 chromosomal13 (11.2)139
Total no. birth defectsa114 (100.0)392451
Total no. of babies with birth defects105 (92.1)372246

a Children with multiple defects appear more than once in the table. A total of 9 infants had multiple defects. ICD, International Classification of Diseases; ART, assisted reproductive technology; IVF-ET, in vitro fertilization fresh embryo transfer; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; FET, frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

Parental factors

In the IVF-ET group, the number of birth defects was significantly higher with maternal age >35, male factor diagnoses and diminished ovarian reserve (P<0.05; Table III). In the FET group, an increased risk of birth defects was significantly associated with multiple births and maternal age >35 years (P<0.05; Table IV).

Table III.

Characteristics of maternal and treatment cycles of live birth in the IVF-ET group.

Table III.

Characteristics of maternal and treatment cycles of live birth in the IVF-ET group.

ParameterSC (n)CA (n)P-value
Sex 0.275
  Male2,53435
  Female2,32224
Plurality 0.665
  Single births2,82736
  Multiple births2,02923
ART 0.601
  IVF2,88237
  ICSI1,97422
Maternal age (years) 0.009
  >35   78317
  ≤354,07342
Abortion history 0.834
  Yes2,15627
  No2,70032
BMI 0.263
  <23.02,73236
  ≥23.0–25.01,13416
  ≥25.0   990  7
Infertility diagnosis 0.000
  Male factora1,84214<0.001
  Tubal factors2,404300.053
Diminished ovarian reserve  99  80.001
  Uterine factors  23  10.385
  Endometriosis   125  00.182
  Ovulation disorders  87  30.428
  Unexplained   246  30.487
  Other factors  30  00.545
Duration of infertility (years)   4.16±3.04   4.56±3.330.32
Number of retrieved oocytes14.05±7.5813.37±7.460.496
Embryos transferred   2.10±0.55   2.15±0.150.443

a Male factor vs. Diminished ovarian reserve. SC, spontaneous conception; CA, congenital anomaly; IVF-ET, in vitro fertilization fresh embryo transfer; FET, frozen embryo transfer; BMI, Mass Index.

Table IV.

Characteristics of maternal and treatment cycles of live birth in the FET group.

Table IV.

Characteristics of maternal and treatment cycles of live birth in the FET group.

ParameterSC (n)CA (n)P-value
Sex 0.769
  Male2,16025
  Female1,98021
Plurality 0.002
  Single births2,11834
  Multiple births2,02012
Maternal age (years) 0.000
  >35   49015
  ≤353,65031
Embryo transfer2.56±0.6042.65±0.6040.347

[i] SC, spontaneous conception; CA, congenital anomaly.

Multivariate analysis

Multivariate analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of CAs in the IVF-ET and FET groups. In the IVF-ET group, CAs were not significantly correlated with maternal age or infertility diagnosis (Table V). However, maternal age was an independent predictor of CAs in the FET group (P<0.05; Table IV).

Table V.

Multivariate analysis to determine independent predictors of congenital anomalies in the IVF-ET and FET groups.

Table V.

Multivariate analysis to determine independent predictors of congenital anomalies in the IVF-ET and FET groups.

ParameterOdds ratio95% confidence intervalP-value
IVF-ET group
  Maternal age1.6230.341–1.1140.109
  Infertility diagnosis1.1560.803–1.6650.435
FET group
  Plurality1.1340.737–1.7440.567
  Maternal age1.7991.313–2.466<0.001

[i] IVF-ET, in vitro fertilization fresh embryo transfer; FET, frozen embryo transfer.

Although there were fluctuations in clinical pregnancy rates during the study period, there was an overall increase in the clinical pregnancy rate in the IVF-ET group between 2004 and 2014 (Fig. 1). In the FET group, a substantial decline in the clinical pregnancy rate was observed from 2004 to 2005, followed by a period of no obvious change over the next 9 years (Fig. 1). Similarly, no significant differences in temporal trends for live birth delivery rates were observed between the groups. The spontaneous abortion rate in the IVF-ET group increased throughout the study period, reaching nearly 50% in 2014. Conversely, the spontaneous abortion rate declined in the FET group from 2004–2006 until 2006 and then plateaued until 2014 (Fig. 1). Ectopic pregnancy rates in the IVF-ET group decreased throughout the study period, however they remained higher compared with the FET group (Fig. 1). The multiple gestation rate decreased gradually in the IVF-ET group, whereas In the FET group a decline occurred from 2005 to 2008 followed by an increase from 2009 to 2014 (Fig. 1). Throughout the study period, the overall malformation rate remained relatively stable in the IVF-ET and FET groups (Fig. 1). None of the identified trends were statistically significant.

Discussion

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the risk of CAs in infants conceived through ART treatments, including IVF-ET and FET, relative to infants born after SC in infertile women; additionally, the impact of IVF-ET and ICSI on the risk of CAs was evaluated. The rate of CAs in infants conceived through ART infants ranged from 1.10–1.20%. Yin et al (21) previously reported the rate of major CAs to be 2.22% in ART infants in China. A meta-analysis published by Wen et al (22) reviewed 46 studies including 124,468 infants conceived through ART and reported a pooled risk estimation of 1.37. Another recent paper analysed the outcomes for infants born after ART treatments (23). The current study demonstrated that the rate of CAs (3.75%) was higher compared with that reported by the European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies (EUROCAT; 2.0%) (23). However, the rate of CAs in infants conceived via ART was not significantly different compared with those conceived via SC within the infertile population.

In the present study, the prevalence of major anomalies and the distribution of anomalies in infants conceived through ART was similar to the data reported by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (24). The most frequent anomalies were heart defects, followed by gastrointestinal anomalies and anomalies of cheilopalatognathus. The underlying mechanisms responsible for the association between ART and CAs are uncertain and warrant further research. An excess risk of CAs in infants conceived through ART is associated with multiple factors (1). Factors associated with treatment that may increase the risk of birth defects include the age of infertile couples, underlying causes of infertility and medications used to induce ovulation or maintain the pregnancy in the early stages, which in turn may have effects on endometrial and cervical tissues and placentation or may impair embryo-endometrial synchronization. Furthermore, factors associated with ART procedures, including the culture media composition, length of culture, freezing and thawing of embryos, potential for polyspermic fertilization, delayed fertilization of the oocyte, altered hormonal environment at the time of implantation and manipulation of gametes and embryos may affect the risk of Cas (25,26). Older females (≥35 years) may explain the results of the current study as demonstrated by a previous study (27). Older females undergoing ART have an increased risk of producing abnormal gametes, resulting in poor obstetrical and perinatal outcomes (27). In the present study, maternal age parameters in the FET group were demonstrated to be correlated with CAs.

High rates of multiple births were observed in the present study. Previous studies have reported that ART leads to more multiple pregnancies compared with SC, the majority of which are twin pregnancies. Additionally, CAs are more frequent in twins compared with than single births (2830). The results of the present study also suggest that the risk of CAs in infants conceived via ART may be associated with male factors. It has previously been reported that abnormal sperm morphology and subfertility in fathers is associated with hypospadias in offspring (31). The concern is that bypassing the natural protective barriers to poor quality sperm fertilization may be associated with an increased risk of future health problems in offspring (32). However, the risk of CAs in infants conceived via ICSI compared with those in the IVF-ET and FET groups was not significantly different.

The present study has a number of limitations. The most obvious is the reliance upon retrospective data, which may result in recall bias. Another disadvantage is that pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing ART were not compared with naturally conceived infants at birth. Data were collected during the hospitalization at birth, and thus an evaluation of the delayed or long-term effects of ART was not attempted and would require extended follow-up. Although the present study was adjusted for maternal age uncontrolled or unmeasured risk factors could potentially produce biases.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study systematically designed to compare the risk of CAs with various ART methods. In summary, in the present study of 9,101 infants conceived via ART offspring, no significant increase in CAs was observed compared with those conceived via SC. This is consistent with a previous Chinese multicentre study (1.35%) (33). Although the majority of infants conceived via ART were free of birth defects, it is unclear whether other factors contributed to or could explain the observed associations. The results of the present study may be used to provide guidance when counselling patients who are considering treatment for infertility in China.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all of the doctors, nurses and embryologists in the Reproductive Medicine Center of Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology for their help in collecting data.

Funding

The present study was supported by the Tianjin Key Technologies Research and Development Program (grant no. 05YFGZGX09900).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

YH, HL and YZ contributed to project development and data collection. YH was responsible for writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in this study.

Consent for publication

All data was anonymized, however written informed consent for publication of clinical data and clinical images was obtained from the patients.

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Qin J, Sheng X, Wang H, Liang D, Tan H and Xia J: Assisted reproductive technology and risk of congenital malformations: A meta-analysis based on cohort studies. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 292:777–798. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Boulet SL, Kirby RS, Reefhuis J, Zhang Y, Sunderam S, Cohen B, Bernson D, Copeland G, Bailey MA, Jamieson DJ, et al: Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects among liveborn infants in florida, massachusetts, and michigan, 2000–2010. JAMA Pediatr. 170:e1549342016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Liberman RF, Getz KD, Heinke D, Luke B, Stern JE, Declercq ER, Chen X, Lin AE and Anderka M: Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: Effects of subfertility and multiple births. Birth Defects Res. 109:1144–1153. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Barnhart KT: Assisted reproductive technologies and perinatal morbidity: Interrogating the association. Fertil Steril. 99:299–302. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Huang B, Qian K, Li Z, Yue J, Yang W, Zhu G and Zhang H: Neonatal outcomes after early rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection: An analysis of a 5-year period. Fertil Steril. 103(1432–1437): e12015.PubMed/NCBI

6 

Pelkonen S, Hartikainen AL, Ritvanen A, Koivunen R, Martikainen H, Gissler M and Tiitinen A: Major congenital anomalies in children born after frozen embryo transfer: A cohort study 1995–2006. Hum Reprod. 29:1552–1557. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Huang B, Li Z, Zhu L, Hu D, Liu Q, Zhu G and Zhang H: Progesterone elevation on the day of HCG administration may affect rescue ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online. 29:88–93. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Shankaran S: Outcomes from infancy to adulthood after assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 101:1217–1221. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Saunders DM, Mathews M and Lancaster PA: The australian register: Current research and future role. A preliminary report. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 541:7–21. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Sutcliffe AG and Ludwig M: Outcome of assisted reproduction. Lancet. 370:351–359. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Yue MX, Fu XW, Zhou GB, Hou YP, Du M, Wang L and Zhu SE: Abnormal DNA methylation in oocytes could be associated with a decrease in reproductive potential in old mice. J Assist Reprod Genet. 29:643–650. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Huang B, Hu D, Qian K, Ai J, Li Y, Jin L, Zhu G and Zhang H: Is frozen embryo transfer cycle associated with a significantly lower incidence of ectopic pregnancy? An analysis of more than 30,000 cycles. Fertil Steril. 102:1345–1349. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Menkveld R: Clinical significance of the low normal sperm morphology value as proposed in the fifth edition of the WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. Asian J Androl. 12:47–58. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Fang C, Huang R, Li TT, Jia L, Li LL and Liang XY: Day-2 and day-3 sequential transfer improves pregnancy rate in patients with repeated IVF-embryo transfer failure: A retrospective case-control study. Reprod Biomed Online. 26:30–35. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology: The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: Proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod. 26:1270–1283. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Kuwayama M: Highly efficient vitrification for cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos: The Cryotop method. Theriogenology. 67:73–80. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Yang X, Dong X, Huang K, Wang L, Xiong T, Ji L and Zhang H: The effect of accompanying dominant follicle development/ovulation on the outcomes of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer in HRT cycle. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 6:718–723. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

18 

Zhu L, Xi Q, Zhang H, Li Y, Ai J and Jin L: Blastocyst culture and cryopreservation to optimize clinical outcomes of warming cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 27:154–160. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, Sullivan E and van der Poel S: International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology; World Health Organization: The international committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technology (ICMART) and the world health organization (WHO) revised glossary on ART terminology, 2009. Hum Reprod. 24:2683–2687. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

World Health Organization, . ICD-10: International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems: Tenth revision. 2nd edition. Beijing: People's Med Publ House; 2004

21 

Yin L, Hang F, Gu LJ, Xu B, Ma D and Zhu GJ: Analysis of birth defects among children 3 years after conception through assisted reproductive technology in China. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 97:744–749. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Wen J, Jiang J, Ding C, Dai J, Liu Y, Xia Y, Liu J and Hu Z: Birth defects in children conceived by in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: A meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 97(1331–1337): e1–e4. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

23 

Setti Levi PE, Moioli M, Smeraldi A, Cesaratto E, Menduni F, Livio S, Morenghi E and Patrizio P: Obstetric outcome and incidence of congenital anomalies in 2351 IVF/ICSI babies. J Assist Reprod Genet. 33:711–717. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China. Beijing: China Birth Defects Prev Rep; 2012

25 

Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C and Webb S: The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 346:725–730. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Milne E, de Klerk N and Bower C: Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 19:330–353. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Lean SC, Derricott H, Jones RL and Heazell AEP: Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 12:e01862872017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Contribution of assisted reproductive technology and ovulation-inducing drugs to triplet and higher-order multiple births-United States, 1980–1997. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 49:535–538. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

29 

Reynolds MA, Schieve LA, Martin JA, Jeng G and Macaluso M: Trends in multiple births conceived using assisted reproductive technology, United States, 1997–2000. Pediatrics. 111:1159–1162. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

30 

Moini A, Shiva M, Arabipoor A, Hosseini R, Chehrazi M and Sadeghi M: Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology compared with twin pregnancies conceived spontaneously: A prospective follow-up study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 165:29–32. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Fritz G and Czeizel AE: Abnormal sperm morphology and function in the fathers of hypospadiacs. J Reprod Fertil. 106:63–66. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Simon L, Murphy K, Shamsi MB, Liu L, Emery B, Aston KI, Hotaling J and Carrell DT: Paternal influence of sperm DNA integrity on early embryonic development. Hum Reprod. 29:2402–2412. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Yan J, Huang G, Sun Y, Zhao X, Chen S, Zou S, Hao C, Quan S and Chen ZJ: Birth defects after assisted reproductive technologies in China: Analysis of 15,405 offspring in seven centers (2004 to 2008). Fertil Steril. 95:458–460. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

October-2018
Volume 16 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Han Y, Luo H and Zhang Y: Congenital anomalies in infants conceived by infertile women through assisted reproductive technology: A cohort study 2004‑2014. Exp Ther Med 16: 3179-3185, 2018
APA
Han, Y., Luo, H., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Congenital anomalies in infants conceived by infertile women through assisted reproductive technology: A cohort study 2004‑2014. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 16, 3179-3185. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6572
MLA
Han, Y., Luo, H., Zhang, Y."Congenital anomalies in infants conceived by infertile women through assisted reproductive technology: A cohort study 2004‑2014". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 16.4 (2018): 3179-3185.
Chicago
Han, Y., Luo, H., Zhang, Y."Congenital anomalies in infants conceived by infertile women through assisted reproductive technology: A cohort study 2004‑2014". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 16, no. 4 (2018): 3179-3185. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6572