|
1
|
Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Robson D, Deyo RA and
Singer DE: Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal
stenosis: Four-year outcomes from the maine lumbar spine study.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 25:556–562. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA and
Singer DE: Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical
management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the
maine lumbar spine study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 30:934–936. 2005.
View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
Cloward RB: History of PLIF: Forty years
of personal experience. Lin PM: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Charles C Thomas. (Springfield). 58–71. 1982.
|
|
4
|
Cloward RB: The treatment of ruptured
lumbar intervertebral discs by vertebral body fusion. I.
Indications, operative technique, after care. J Neurosurg.
10:154–168. 1953. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Harms JG and Jeszenszky D: Die posteriore,
lumbale, interkorporelle fusion in unilateraler transforaminaler
technik. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 10:90–102. 1998.(In German).
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Scheufler KM, Dohmen H and Vougioukas VI:
Percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the
treatment of degenerative lumbar instability. Neurosurgery 60 (4
Suppl 2). S203–S213. 2007.
|
|
7
|
Liu J, Deng H, Long X, Chen X, Xu R and
Liu Z: A comparative study of perioperative complications between
transforaminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion in
degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 25:1575–1580.
2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Mehta VA, McGirt MJ, Garcés Ambrossi GL,
Parker SL, Sciubba DM, Bydon A, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL and Witham
TF: Trans-foraminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion:
Comparison of surgical morbidity. Neurol Res. 33:38–42. 2011.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Pradhan BB, Nassar JA, Delamarter RB and
Wang JC: Single-level lumbar spine fusion: A comparison of anterior
and posterior approaches. J Spinal Disord Tech. 15:355–361. 2002.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Stevens KJ, Spenciner DB, Griffiths KL,
Kim KD, Zwienenberg-Lee M, Alamin T and Bammer R: Comparison of
minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar
fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure
studies. J Spinal Disord Tech. 19:77–86. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Foley KT, Holly LT and Schwender JD:
Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 28 (15
Suppl):S26–S35. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Rouben D, Casnellie M and Ferguson M:
Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal
lumbar interbody fusion: A clinical and radiographic follow-up. J
Spinal Disord Tech. 24:288–296. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Eck JC, Hodges S and Humphreys SC:
Minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg.
15:321–329. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
Goldstein CL, Macwan K, Sundararajan K and
Rampersaud YR: Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of
minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion:
Meta-analysis and systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine. 24:416–427.
2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Hackenberg L, Halm H, Bullmann V, Vieth V,
Schneider M and Liljenqvist U: Transforaminal lumbar interbody
fusion: A safe technique with satisfactory three to five year
results. Eur Spine J. 14:551–558. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Mummaneni PV and Rodts GE Jr: The
mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery. 57
(4 Suppl):S256–S261. 2005.
|
|
17
|
Arts MP, Wolfs JF, Kuijlen JM and de
Ruiter GC: Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery in the
treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: Study protocol of a
multicentre, randomised controlled trial (MISOS trial). BMJ Open.
7:e0178822017.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Franke J, Greiner-Perth R, Boehm H,
Mahlfeld K, Grasshoff H, Allam Y and Awiszus F: Comparison of a
minimally invasive procedure versus standard microscopic discotomy:
A prospective randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur Spine J.
18:992–1000. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Minamide A, Yoshida M, Simpson AK,
Nakagawa Y, Iwasaki H, Tsutsui S, Takami M, Hashizume H, Yukawa Y
and Yamada H: Minimally invasive spinal decompression for
degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and stenosis maintains
stability and may avoid the need for fusion. Bone Joint J 100-B.
499–506. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
20
|
Tian W, Yan K and Han X, Yu J, Jin P and
Han X: Comparison of the clinical and radiographic results between
cervical artificial disk replacement and anterior cervical fusion:
A 6-year prospective nonrandomized comparative study. Clin Spine
Surg. 30:E578–E586. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Rodríguez-Vela J, Lobo-Escolar A,
Joven-Aliaga E, Herrera A, Vicente J, Suñén E, Loste A and Tabuenca
A: Perioperative and short-term advantages of mini-open approach
for lumbar spinal fusion. Eur Spine J. 18:1194–1201. 2009.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22
|
Rodríguez-Vela J, Lobo-Escolar A, Joven E,
Muñoz-Marín J, Herrera A and Velilla J: Clinical outcomes of
minimally invasive versus open approach for one-level
transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the 3-to 4-year
follow-up. Eur Spine J. 22:2857–2863. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, Li CQ, Zheng WJ
and Liu J: Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open
transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic
spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Eur Spine J. 19:1780–1784. 2010.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, Li CQ, Zheng WJ
and Liu J: Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar
interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously
treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine.
Eur Spine J. 20:623–628. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Guan J, Bisson EF, Dailey AT, Hood RS and
Schmidt MH: Comparison of clinical outcomes in the national
neurosurgery quality and outcomes database for open versus
minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine
(Phila Pa 1976). 41:E416–E421. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
26
|
Seng C, Siddiqui MA, Wong KP, Zhang K, Yeo
W, Tan SB and Yue WM: Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive
versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A matched-pair
comparison study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 38:2049–2055. 2013.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
27
|
Funao H, Ishii K, Momoshima S, Iwanami A,
Hosogane N, Watanabe K, Nakamura M, Toyama Y and Matsumoto M:
Surgeons' exposure to radiation in single- and multi-level
minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; a
prospective study. PLoS One. 9:e952332014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
28
|
Singh K, Nandyala SV, Marquez-Lara A,
Fineberg SJ, Oglesby M, Pelton MA, Andersson GB, Isayeva D, Jegier
BJ and Phillips FM: A perioperative cost analysis comparing
single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar
interbody fusion. Spine J. 14:1694–1701. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
29
|
Vogelsang JP: The translaminar approch in
combination with a tubular retractor system for the treatment of
far cranio-laterally and foraminally extruded lumbar disc
herniations. Zentralbl Neurochir. 68:24–28. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
30
|
Wang HL, Lü FZ, Jiang JY, Ma X, Xia XL and
Wang LX: Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion via MAST
Quadrant retractor versus open surgery: A prospective randomized
clinical trial. Chin Med J (Engl). 124:3868–3874. 2011.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
31
|
Issacs RE, Podichetty VK, Santiago P,
Sandhu FA, Spears J, Kelly K, Rice L and Fessler RG: Minimally
invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody
fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine. 3:98–105. 2005.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
