|
1
|
Van Roggen JFG and Hogendoorn PC: Soft
tissue tumours of the retroperitoneum. Sarcoma. 4:17–26. 2000.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Mehdi G, Maheshwari V, Afzal S, Ansari HA
and Ahmad I: Image-guided fine-needle aspiration of retroperitoneal
masses: The role of the cytopathologist. J Cytol. 30:36–41. 2013.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Das C, Sengupta M, Mukhopadhyay M and Saha
AK: Critical clinical appraisal of the role of computed
tomography-guided minimally invasive aspiration cytology in
evaluation of retroperitoneal masses. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol.
35:60–65. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Guo Z, Kurtycz DF, De Las Casas LE and
Hoerl HD: Radiologically guided percutaneous fine-needle aspiration
biopsy of pelvic and retroperitoneal masses: A retrospective study
of 68 cases. Diagn Cytopathol. 25:43–49. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Micames C, Jowell PS, White R, Paulson E,
Nelson R, Morse M, Hurwitz H, Pappas T, Tyler D and McGrath K:
Lower frequency of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with
pancreatic cancer diagnosed by EUS-guided FNA vs. percutaneous FNA.
Gastrointest Endosc. 58:690–695. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Paquin SC, Gariépy G, Lepanto L, Bourdages
R, Raymond G and Sahai AV: A first report of tumor seeding because
of EUS-guided FNA of a pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Gastrointest
Endosc. 61:610–611. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Roman A, Achimas-Cadariu P, Fetica B, Gata
V and Seicean A: CT-guided procedures: An initial experience.
Clujul Med. 91:427–434. 2018.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Golse N, Ducerf C, Rode A, Gouillat C,
Baulieux J and Mabrut JY: Transthoracic approach for liver tumors.
J Visc Surg. 149:e11–e22. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Joudeh AA, Shareef SQ and Al-Abbadi MA:
Fine-needle aspiration followed by core-needle biopsy in the same
setting: Modifying our approach. Acta Cytol. 60:1–13. 2016.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Misra RK, Mitra S, Jain RK, Vahikar S,
Bundela A and Misra P: Image-guided fine needle cytology with
aspiration versus non-aspiration in retroperitoneal masses: Is
aspiration necessary? J Pathol Transl Med. 49:129–135. 2015.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Briffod M, Gentile A and Hébert H:
Cytopuncture in the follow-up of breast carcinoma. Acta Cytol.
26:195–200. 1982.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
VanderLaan PA: Fine-needle aspiration and
core needle biopsy: An update on 2 common minimally invasive tissue
sampling modalities. Cancer Cytopathol. 124:862–870. 2016.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Nasuti JF, Gupta PK and Baloch ZW:
Diagnostic value and cost-effectiveness of on-site evaluation of
fine-needle aspiration specimens: Review of 5,688 cases. Diagn
Cytopathol. 27:1–4. 2002. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
Krogerus L and Kholová I: Cell block in
cytological diagnostics: Review of preparatory techniques. Acta
Cytol. 62:237–243. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Łukasiewicz E, Ziemiecka A, Jakubowski W,
Vojinovic J, Bogucevska M and Dobruch-Sobczak K: Fine-needle versus
core-needle biopsy - which one to choose in preoperative assessment
of focal lesions in the breasts? Literature review. J Ultrason.
17:267–274. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Raghuveer CV, Leekha I, Pai MR and
Adhikari P: Fine needle aspiration cytology versus fine needle
sampling without aspiration. A prospective study of 200 cases.
Indian J Med Sci. 56:431–439. 2002.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Pinki P, Alok D, Ranjan A and Nanak Chand
M: Fine needle aspiration cytology versus fine needle capillary
sampling in cytological diagnosis of thyroid lesion. Iran J Pathol.
10:47–53. 2015.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Monaco SE, Khalbuss WE and Pantanowitz L:
Benign non-infectious causes of lymphadenopathy: A review of
cytomorphology and differential diagnosis. Diagn Cytopathol.
40:925–938. 2012. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Meyer L, Gibbons D, Ashfaq R, Vuitch F and
Saboorian MH: Fine-needle aspiration findings in Castleman's
disease. Diagn Cytopathol. 21:57–60. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Van Houdt WJ, Schrijver AM, Cohen-Hallaleh
RB, Memos N, Fotiadis N, Smith MJ, Hayes AJ, Van Coevorden F and
Strauss DC: Needle tract seeding following core biopsies in
retroperitoneal sarcoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 43:1740–1745. 2017.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Berger-Richardson D and Swallow CJ: Needle
tract seeding after percutaneous biopsy of sarcoma: Risk/benefit
considerations. Cancer. 123:560–567. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22
|
Barrientos-Ruiz I, Ortiz-Cruz EJ,
Serrano-Montilla J, Bernabeu-Taboada D and Pozo-Kreilinger JJ: Are
biopsy tracts a concern for seeding and local recurrence in
sarcomas? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 475:511–518. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Sartorelli KH, Partrick D and Meagher DP
Jr: Port-site recurrence after thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary
metastasis owing to osteogenic sarcoma. J Pediatr Surg.
31:1443–1444. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Walsh GL and Nesbitt JC: Tumor implants
after thoracoscopic resection of a metastatic sarcoma. Ann Thorac
Surg. 59:215–216. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Hughes TM and Thomas JM: Sarcoma
metastases due to iatrogenic implantation. Eur J Surg Oncol.
26:50–52. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
26
|
Socea LI, Visan DC, Barbuceanu SF, Apostol
TV, Bratu OG and Socea B: The antioxidant activity of some
acylhydrazones with dibenzo[a,d][7]annulene moiety. Rev Chim
(Bucharest). 69:795–797. 2018.
|
|
27
|
Radulescu A, Madan V, Aungurenci A, Bratu
O, Farcas C, Dinu M and Mischianu D: Antibiotic resistant urinary
tract infections in an urology ward. Rom J Mil Med. 118:20–22.
2015.
|
|
28
|
Spinu D, Bratu O, Popescu R, Marcu D,
Radulescu A and Mischianu D: Clostridium difficile - an emerging
plague. Rom J Mil Med. 118:12–15. 2015.
|
|
29
|
Lupu M, Caruntu A, Caruntu C, Papagheorghe
LML, Ilie MA, Voiculescu V, Boda D, Constantin C, Tanase C, Sifaki
M, et al: Neuroendocrine factors: The missing link in non melanoma
skin cancer (Review). Oncol Rep. 38:1327–1340. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
30
|
Neagu M, Caruntu C, Constantin C, Boda D,
Zurac S, Spandidos DA and Tsatsakis AM: Chemically induced skin
carcinogenesis: Updates in experimental models (Review). Oncol Rep.
35:2516–2528. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
31
|
Boda D: Cellomics as integrative omics for
cancer. Curr Proteomics. 10:237–245. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
32
|
Neagu M, Constantin C, Tanase C and Boda
D: Patented biomarker panels in early detection of cancer. Recent
Pat Biomark. 1:10–24. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
33
|
Boda D, Docea AO, Calina D, Ilie MA,
Caruntu C, Zurac S, Neagu M, Constantin C, Branisteanu DE,
Voiculescu V, et al: Human papilloma virus: Apprehending the link
with carcinogenesis and unveiling new research avenues (Review).
Int J Oncol. 52:637–655. 2018.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
34
|
Solomon I, Voiculescu VM, Caruntu C, Lupu
M, Popa A, Ilie MA, Albulescu R, Caruntu A, Tanase C, Constantin C,
et al: Neuroendocrine factors and head and neck squamous cell
carcinoma: An affair to remember. Dis Markers. 2018:97878312018.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
35
|
Lupu M, Caruntu A, Caruntu C, Boda D,
Moraru L, Voiculescu V and Bastian A: Non-invasive imaging of
actinic cheilitis and squamous cell carcinoma of the lip. Mol Clin
Oncol. 8:640–646. 2018.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
36
|
Voiculescu VM, Caruntu C, Solomon I, Lupu
M, Ilie MA, Boda D, Constantin C and Neagu M: Squamous cell
carcinoma: Biomarkers and potential therapeutic targetsHuman Skin
Cancers-Pathways, Mechanisms, Targets and Treatments. Blumenberg M:
IntechOpen; London: pp. 135–159. 2018
|
|
37
|
Wilkinson MJ, Martin JL, Khan AA, Hayes
AJ, Thomas JM and Strauss DC: Percutaneous core needle biopsy in
retroperitoneal sarcomas does not influence local recurrence or
overall survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 22:853–858. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
38
|
Hwang SY, Warrier S, Thompson S, Davidson
T, Yang JL and Crowe P: Safety and accuracy of core biopsy in
retroperitoneal sarcomas. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 12:e174–e178.
2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
