Efficacy of anti-T-lymphocyte globulin-Fresenius as an induction agent in deceased-donor renal transplantation: A cohort study
- Authors:
- Published online on: January 15, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8451
- Pages: 2384-2390
Metrics: Total
Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Abstract
Anti-T-lymphocyte globulin (ATG) is frequently used in the induction regimen of renal transplantation, but its dose has not been standardized. In the present study, the efficacy of different ATG-Fresenius (ATG-F) doses was assessed in recipients of renal transplantation. A total of 131 adult recipients of renal transplantation who received ATG-F induction between August 2015 and July 2018 were included. The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft function, as well as graft and patient survival within 12 months post-transplant, was assessed, and adverse events, including hematologic and infection-associated side effects, were compared between patients receiving a cumulative ATG-F dose of <7 or ≥7 mg/kg. The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was similar between patients receiving cumulative doses of <7 and ≥7 mg/kg (7.5 vs. 4.7%, P=0.766). The incidence of infection within 12 months was lower in the ATG-F <7 mg/kg group compared with that in the ≥7 mg/kg group (26.9 vs. 50.0%, P=0.006), but the incidence of pneumonia did not differ between the ATG-F <7 and ≥7 mg/kg groups (10.4 vs. 20.3%, P=0.117). The incidence of urinary infection was higher in the ≥7 mg/kg group than in the <7 mg/kg group (20.4 vs. 7.46%, P=0.033), while the extent and duration of anemia and lymphopenia was similar between groups. There was no difference in graft function, delayed graft function, as well as overall and graft survival between the groups. In conclusion, a moderate reduction in the cumulative ATG-F dose was not associated with an increased risk of acute rejection, while the risk of infection was reduced. Optimization of the ATG-F dose for induction may facilitate the reduction of the risk of infection without compromising the induction efficacy in renal transplant recipients.
