Meta‑analysis of the effect of cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty on displaced femoral neck fracture in the elderly

Kong,Xiangan

doi:10.3892/etm.2020.8921

Meta‑analysis of the effect of cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty on displaced femoral neck fracture in the elderly

Authors:
- Xiangan Kong
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Orthopaedics, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei, Anhui 230011, P.R. China
Published online on: June 22, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8921
Pages: 2173-2183
Copyright: © Kong . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

The present meta-analysis was designed to systematically evaluate the effect of cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty on femoral neck fractures in the elderly and its effect on intraoperative bleeding and postoperative complications. Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI and WANFANG databases were retrieved and retrieval time was from inception to February 2019. Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications and postoperative mortality were compared between cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty. RevMan 5.3 statistical software was used for analysis. A total of 16 randomized controlled trials were included, with a total of 2,384 patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty. The cemented group had a longer operation time [weighted mean difference (WMD)=7.07, 95% confidence interval (CI)=3.91‑10.23, P<0.0001], but it had lower incidence of intraoperative and postoperative fracture around the prosthesis (OR=0.25, 95% CI=0.13‑0.47, P<0.0001) and shorter length of hospital stay (WMD=‑1.78, 95% CI=‑13.38‑‑0.17, P=0.03). There was no significant difference in pulmonary embolism, mortality, lower extremity deep vein thrombosis rate, joint dislocation rate, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative incidence of lung, urinary system and incision infection between the two groups. To summarize, compared with the uncemented group, the cemented group had long operation time and a high incidence of pulmonary embolism, but had an advantage in reducing the risk of periprosthetic fractures. In addition, cemented hemiarthroplasty did not increase the mortality rate, the rate of deep vein thrombosis in lower extremities, the rate of joint dislocation, intraoperative blood loss, and the incidence of postoperative pulmonary, urinary, and incision infections.

View Figures

View References

1	Collin PG, D'Antoni AV, Loukas M, Oskouian RJ and Tubbs RS: Hip fractures in the elderly-: A clinical anatomy review. Clin Anat. 30:89–97. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
2	LeBlanc KE, Muncie HL Jr and LeBlanc LL: Hip fracture: Diagnosis, treatment, and secondary prevention. Am Fam Physician. 89:945–951. 2014.
3	Leal J, Gray AM, Prieto-Alhambra D, Arden NK, Cooper C, Javaid MK and Judge A: REFReSH study group: Impact of hip fracture on hospital care costs: A population-based study. Osteoporos Int. 27:549–558. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
4	Florschutz AV, Langford JR, Haidukewych GJ and Koval KJ: Femoral neck fractures: Current management. J Orthop Trauma. 29:121–129. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
5	Caldwell L, Chan CM, Sanders JO and Gorczyca JT: Detection of femoral neck fractures in pediatric patients with femoral shaft fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 37:e164–e167. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
6	Slobogean GP, Stockton DJ, Zeng BF, Wang D, Ma B and Pollak AN: Femoral neck shortening in adult patients under the age of 55 years is associated with worse functional outcomes: Analysis of the prospective multi-center study of hip fracture outcomes in China (SHOC). Injury. 48:1837–1842. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
7	Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ and McQuay HJ: Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 17:1–12. 1996.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
8	Ma C, Jiang F, Huang C and Liu Z: Contrast of effect and prognosis of artificial hip joint maken by biomaterials and bone-cement for femoral neck fracture. Jianyan Yixue Yu Linchuang. 13:1826–1828. 2016.
9	Deangelis JP, Ademi A, Staff I and Lewis CG: Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: A prospective randomized trial with early follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 26:135–140. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
10	Emery RJ, Broughton NS, Desai K, Bulstrode CJ and Thomas TL: Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for subcapital fracture of the femoral neck. A prospective randomised trial of cemented Thompson and uncemented Moore stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 73:322–324. 1991.PubMed/NCBI
11	Figved W, Opland V, Frihagen F, Jervidalo T, Madsen JE and Nordsletten L: Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 467:2426–2435. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
12	Inngul C, Blomfeldt R, Ponzer S and Enocson A: Cemented versus uncemented arthroplasty in patients with a displaced fracture of the femoral neck: A randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J. 97-B:1475–1480. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
13	Li J: Comparison of the effects and complications of biotype and cement-based artificial hip prosthesis in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in the elderly. Clin Med Chin. 33:1127–1130. 2017.(In Chinese).
14	Khorami M, Arti H and Aghdam AA: Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures. Pak J Med Sci. 32:44–48. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
15	Langslet E, Frihagen F, Opland V, Madsen JE, Nordsletten L and Figved W: Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: 5-year followup of a randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 472:1291–1299. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
16	Moerman S, Mathijssen NMC, Niesten DD, Riedijk R, Rijnberg WJ, Koëter S, Kremers van de Hei K, Tuinebreijer WE, Molenaar TL, Nelissen RGHH and Vochteloo AJH: More complications in uncemented compared to cemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: A randomized controlled trial of 201 patients, with one year follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 18(169)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
17	Parker MI, Pryor G and Gurusamy K: Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for intracapsular hip fractures: A randomised controlled trial in 400 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 92:116–122. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
18	Pan S: Comparison of the effects of cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures. Chin J Postgrad Med. 36:41–43. 2013.
19	Sonne-Holm S, Dyrbye M, Walter S and Jensen JS: Bone scintigraphy in Moore hemiarthroplasty with and without cement following femoral neck fractures. A controlled study. Acta Orthop Scand. 54:194–197. 1983.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
20	Talsnes O, Hjelmstedt F, Pripp AH, Reikerås O and Dahl OE: No difference in mortality between cemented and uncemented hemiprosthesis for elderly patients with cervical hip fracture. A prospective randomized study on 334 patients over 75 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 133:805–809. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
21	Taylor F, Wright M and Zhu M: Hemiarthroplasty of the hip with and without cement: A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 94:577–583. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
22	Vidović D, Punda M, Daraboš N, Bekavac-Bešlin M, Bakota B and Matejčić A: Regional bone loss following femoral neck fracture: A comparison between cemented and cementless hemiarthroplasty. Injury. 46 (Suppl 6):S52–S56. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
23	Du Z: Analysis of the effect of cemented and uncemented artificial double femoral head replacement. Chin Med Eng. 29–30. 2014.
24	Sprague S, Slobogean GP, Scott T, Chahal M and Bhandari M: Young femoral neck fractures: Are we measuring outcomes that matter? Injury. 46:507–514. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
25	Grosso MG, Danoff JR, Padgett DE, Iorio R and Macaulay WB: The cemented unipolar prosthesis for the management of displaced femoral neck fractures in the dependent osteopenic elderly. J Arthroplasty. 31:1040–1046. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
26	Azegami S, Gurusamy KS and Parker MJ: Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for hip fractures: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Hip Int. 21:509–517. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
27	Borghi B and Casati A: Rizzoli Study Group on Orthopaedic Ananesthesia: Thromboembolic complications after total hip replacement. Int Orthop. 26:44–47. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar