|
1
|
Osterman MJK: Recent Trends in vaginal
birth after cesarean delivery: United states, 2016-2018. NCHS Data
Brief. 1–8. 2020.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Lundgren I, Smith V, Nilsson C,
Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Nicoletti J, Devane D, Bernloehr A, van
Limbeek E, Lalor J and Begley C: Clinician-centred interventions to
increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): A systematic
review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 15(16)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
Euro PERISTAT: European Perinatal Health
Report: The health and care of pregnant women and their babies in
2010. EURONEOSTAT, 2013. https://www.europeristat.com/reports/european-perinatal-health-report-2010.html.
Acessed September 9, 2020.
|
|
4
|
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD): Health at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators, OECD
Publishing, Paris, 2019.
|
|
5
|
Cavallaro FL, Cresswell JA, França GV,
Victora CG, Barros AJ and Ronsmans C: Trends in caesarean delivery
by country and wealth quintile: Cross-sectional surveys in southern
Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Bull World Health Organ. 91:914D–922D.
2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Quinlan JD and Murphy NJ: Cesarean
delivery: Counseling issues and complication management. Am Fam
Physician. 91:178–184. 2015.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
No authors listed. ACOG committee opinion
no. 559: Cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstet Gynecol.
121:904–907. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
No authors listed. ACOG Practice bulletin
no. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet
Gynecol. 116:450–463. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
9
|
Jameton A: Nursing practice: The ethical
issues. 1984. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, pp331, 1984.
|
|
10
|
Hamric AB, Borchers CT and Epstein EG:
Development and testing of an instrument to measure moral distress
in healthcare professionals. AJOB Prim Res. 3:1–9. 2012.
|
|
11
|
Hunt M, Chénier A, Bezanson K, Nouvet E,
Bernard C, de Laat S, Krishnaraj G and Schwartz L: Moral
experiences of humanitarian health professionals caring for
patients who are dying or likely to die in a humanitarian crisis. J
Int Humanit Action. 3:1–13. 2018.
|
|
12
|
Melman GJ, Parlikad AK and Cameron EAB:
Balancing scarce hospital resources during the COVID-19 pandemic
using discrete-event simulation. Health Care Manag Sci. 9:1–19.
2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
No authors listed. ACOG Practice Bulletin
No. 205: Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol.
133:e110–e127. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
14
|
Khalil A, von Dadelszen P, Draycott T,
Ugwumadu A, O'Brien P and Magee L: Change in the incidence of
stillbirth and preterm delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA.
324:705–706. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
15
|
Reale SC, Fields KG, Lumbreras-Marquez MI,
King CH, Burns SL, Huybrechts KF and Bateman BT: Association
between number of in-person health care visits and SARS-CoV-2
infection in obstetrical patients. JAMA. 324:1210–1212.
2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
Ashish KC, Gurung R, Kinney MV, Sunny AK,
Moinuddin M, Basnet O, Paudel P, Bhattarai P, Subedi K, Shrestha
MP, et al: Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic response on intrapartum
care, stillbirth, and neonatal mortality outcomes in Nepal: A
prospective observational study. Lancet Glob Health. 8:e1273–e1281.
2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
17
|
Kumari V, Mehta K and Choudhary R:
COVID-19 outbreak and decreased hospitalisation of pregnant women
in labour. Lancet Glob Health. 8:e1116–e1117. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
18
|
Docea AO, Tsatsakis A, Albulescu D,
Cristea O, Zlatian O, Vinceti M, Moschos SA, Tsoukalas D, Goumenou
M, Drakoulis N, et al: A new threat from an old enemy: Re-emergence
of coronavirus (Review). Int J Mol Med. 45:1631–1643.
2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
19
|
Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, Denman MA,
Marshall N, Fu RR, Janik R, Nygren P, Walker M and McDonagh M:
Vaginal birth after cesarean: New insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess
(Full Rep). 1–397. 2010.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Curtin SC, Gregory KD, Korst LM and Uddin
SF: Maternal morbidity for vaginal and cesarean deliveries,
according to previous cesarean history: New data from the birth
certificate, 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 64:1–13. 2015.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Eden KB, McDonagh M, Denman MA, Marshall
N, Emeis C, Fu R, Janik R, Walker M and Guise JM: New insights on
vaginal birth after cesarean: Can it be predicted? Obstet Gynecol.
116:967–981. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
22
|
Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network
(MFMU): Vaginal birth after cesarean[calculator]. https://mfmunetwork.bscgwuedu/PublicBSC/MFMU/VGBirthCalc/vagbirthhtml.
Accessed October 10, 2020.
|
|
23
|
Metz TD, Allshouse AA, Faucett AM and
Grobman WA: Validation of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery
prediction model in women with two prior cesarean deliveries.
Obstet Gynecol. 125:948–952. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
24
|
Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY,
Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, et
al: Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after
cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 109:806–812. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
25
|
Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network
(MFMU): Vaginal birth after
cesarean[admission.calculator].https://mfmunetworkbscgwuedu/PublicBSC/MFMU/VGBirthCalc/vagbrth2html.Accessed
September 9, 2020.
|
|
26
|
Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY,
Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Simhan HN, Harper M, et
al: Does information available at admission for delivery improve
prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean? Am J Perinatol.
26:693–701. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
27
|
Costantine MM, Fox KA, Pacheco LD, Mateus
J, Hankins GD, Grobman WA and Saade GR: Does information available
at delivery improve the accuracy of predicting vaginal birth after
cesarean? Validation of the published models in an independent
patient cohort. Am J Perinatol. 28:293–298. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
28
|
Mardy AH, Ananth CV, Grobman WA and
Gyamfi-Bannerman C: A prediction model of vaginal birth after
cesarean in the preterm period. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 215:513.e1–e7.
2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
29
|
Dong L, Tian J, He S, Zhu C, Wang J, Liu C
and Yang J: Possible vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from an
infected mother to her newborn. JAMA. 323:1846–1848.
2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
30
|
Vivanti AJ, Vauloup-Fellous C, Prevot S,
Zupan V, Suffee C, Do Cao J, Benachi A and De Luca D:
Transplacental transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Commun.
11(3572)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
31
|
Parazzini F, Bortolus R, Mauri PA, Favilli
A, Gerli S and Ferrazzi E: Delivery in pregnant women infected with
SARS-CoV-2: A fast review. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 150:41–46.
2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
32
|
Narang K, Enninga EAL, Gunaratne MDSK,
Ibirogba ER, Trad ATA, Elrefaei A, Theiler RN, Ruano R, Szymanski
LM, Chakraborty R and Garovic VD: SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19
during pregnancy: A multidisciplinary review. Mayo Clin Proc.
95:1750–1765. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
33
|
Teles Abrao Trad A, Ibirogba ER, Elrefaei
A, Narang K, Tonni G, Picone O, Suy A, Carreras Moratonas E, Kilby
MD and Ruano R: Complications and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 in
pregnancy: Where and what is the evidence? Hypertens Pregnancy.
39:361–369. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
34
|
Di Mascio D, Khalil A, Saccone G, Rizzo G,
Buca D, Liberati M, Vecchiet J, Nappi L, Scambia G, Berghella V and
D'Antonio F: Outcome of coronavirus spectrum infections (SARS,
MERS, COVID-19) during pregnancy: A systematic review and
meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2(100107)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
35
|
Knight M, Bunch K, Vousden N, Morris E,
Simpson N, Gale C, O'Brien P, Quigley M, Brocklehurst P and
Kurinczuk JJ: UK obstetric surveillance system SARS-CoV-2 infection
in pregnancy collaborative group. Characteristics and outcomes of
pregnant women admitted to hospital with confirmed SARS-CoV-2
infection in UK: National population based cohort study. BMJ.
369(m2107)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
36
|
No authors listed. National Institutes of
Health Consensus Development conference statement: Vaginal birth
after cesarean: New insights March 8-10, 2010. Obstet Gynecol.
115:1279–1295. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
37
|
Sabol B, Denman MA and Guise JM: Vaginal
birth after cesarean: An effective method to reduce cesarean. Clin
Obstet Gynecol. 58:309–319. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
38
|
Tahseen S and Griffiths M: Vaginal birth
after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2)-a systematic review with
meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus
VBAC-1 and repeat (third) caesarean sections. BJOG. 117:5–19.
2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
39
|
Cahill AG, Tuuli M, Odibo AO, Stamilio DM
and Macones GA: Vaginal birth after caesarean for women with three
or more prior caesareans: Assessing safety and success. BJOG.
117:422–427. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
40
|
Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY,
Leindecker S, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner
RJ, et al: Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial
of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med.
351:2581–2589. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
41
|
Smith D, Stringer E, Vladutiu CJ, Zink AH
and Strauss R: Risk of uterine rupture among women attempting
vaginal birth after cesarean with an unknown uterine scar. Am J
Obstet Gynecol. 213:80.e1–80.e5. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
42
|
Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Cohen A, Repke JT and
Lieberman E: Trial of labor after 40 weeks' gestation in women with
prior cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 97:391–393. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
43
|
Coassolo KM, Stamilio DM, Paré E, Peipert
JF, Stevens E, Nelson DB and Macones GA: Safety and efficacy of
vaginal birth after cesarean attempts at or beyond 40 weeks of
gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 106:700–706. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
44
|
Palatnik A and Grobman WA: Induction of
labor versus expectant management for women with a prior cesarean
delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 212:358.e1–e6. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
45
|
Elkousy MA, Sammel M, Stevens E, Peipert
JF and Macones G: The effect of birth weight on vaginal birth after
cesarean delivery success rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 188:824–830.
2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
46
|
Flamm BL and Goings JR: Vaginal birth
after cesarean section: Is suspected fetal macrosomia a
contraindication? Obstet Gynecol. 74:694–697. 1989.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
47
|
Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Cohen A and
Lieberman E: Outcomes of trial of labor following previous cesarean
delivery among women with fetuses weighing >4000 g. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 185:903–905. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
48
|
Jastrow N, Roberge S, Gauthier RJ, Laroche
L, Duperron L, Brassard N and Bujold E: Effect of birth weight on
adverse obstetric outcomes in vaginal birth after cesarean
delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 115:338–343. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
49
|
Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, Hauth
JC, Bloom S, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ,
et al: The MFMU cesarean registry: Factors affecting the success of
trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 193:1016–1023. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
50
|
Regan J, Keup C, Wolfe K, Snyder C and
DeFranco E: Vaginal birth after cesarean success in high-risk
women: A population-based study. J Perinatol. 35:252–257.
2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
51
|
Chauhan SP, Magann EF, Carroll CS,
Barrilleaux PS, Scardo JA and Martin JN Jr: Mode of delivery for
the morbidly obese with prior cesarean delivery: Vaginal versus
repeat cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 185:349–354.
2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
52
|
Hibbard JU, Gilbert S, Landon MB, Hauth
JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Varner MW, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner
RJ, et al: Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with
morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol.
108:125–133. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
53
|
Wilson RD, Lemerand K, Johnson MP, Flake
AW, Bebbington M, Hedrick HL and Adzick NS: Reproductive outcomes
in subsequent pregnancies after a pregnancy complicated by open
maternal-fetal surgery (1996-2007). Am J Obstet Gynecol.
203:209.e1–e6. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
54
|
Ritchie EH: Pregnancy after rupture of the
pregnant uterus. A report of 36 pregnancies and a study of cases
reported since 1932. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 78:642–648.
1971.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
55
|
Calina D, Docea AO, Petrakis D, Egorov AM,
Ishmukhametov AA, Gabibov AG, Shtilman MI, Kostoff R, Carvalho F,
Vinceti M, et al: Towards effective COVID-19 vaccines: Updates,
perspectives and challenges (Review). Int J Mol Med. 46:3–16.
2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
