Open Access

Multimodal imaging and genetic analysis of adult‑onset best vitelliform macular dystrophy in Chinese patients

  • Authors:
    • Ying Lin
    • Tao Li
    • Bingqian Liu
    • Cancan Lyu
    • Yu Lian
    • Jizhu Li
    • Ying  Huang
    • Haichun Li
    • Qingxiu Wu
    • Chenjin Jin
    • Lin Lu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: July 19, 2021     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10466
  • Article Number: 1034
  • Copyright: © Lin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Compared to juvenile‑onset best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD), adult‑onset BVMD is not well characterized and lacks strict diagnostic criteria. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical and genetic characteristics of four advanced‑age Chinese patients with adult‑onset BVMD by combining multimodal imaging and genetic analysis. The four patients (all older than 50 years) were diagnosed with adult‑onset BVMD at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center (Guangzhou, China). Comprehensive ophthalmic examinations were performed, including analyses of best‑corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, slit‑lamp examination, fundus photography, optical coherence tomography, fundus fluorescein angiography and electrooculography. Genomic DNA was extracted from leukocytes isolated from peripheral blood obtained from these patients, their family members and 200 unrelated subjects from the same population. A total of 11 exons of the bestrophin‑1 (BEST1) gene were amplified using PCR and sequenced. All of the four patients presented with lesions in the macular area. The patients were diagnosed with adult‑onset BVMD based on multimodal imaging and genetic analysis. A total of four recurrent mutations, namely c.763C>T (p.Arg255Trp, p.R255W) in exon 7, c.584C>T (p.Ala195Val, p.A195V) in exon 5, c.910_912del GAT (p.304delAsp, p.D304del) in exon 8 and c.310G>C (p.Asp104His, p.D104H) in exon 4 of BEST1, were identified. Sorting intolerant from tolerant predicted that the amino acid substitutions p.R255W, p.A195V and p.D104H in the BEST1 protein were causing the damage. Combining multimodal imaging and genetic analysis was helpful in confirming the diagnosis of patients with adult‑onset BVMD. These results maybe valuable for clinical and genetic counseling and for the development of therapeutic interventions for patients with BVMD.

Introduction

Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) is a hereditary retinal disease characterized by the accumulation of lipofuscin in the central macula of both eyes (1-3). Adult-onset BVMD was first described by Gass (4) more than four decades ago and is usually diagnosed after the age of 40 years (1,4-6). Compared to juvenile-onset BVMD, adult-onset BVMD is associated with a wider spectrum of fundus abnormalities. The descriptions of the first nine cases by Gass (4) reflected the difficulty in differentiating adult-onset BVMD from the full spectrum of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) (4,5,7). Thus, the lack of strict diagnostic criteria for adult-onset BVMD is challenging for clinicians and researchers.

Overall, eyes affected by VMD exhibit various patterns of progressive retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) alterations involving the macula, making it difficult to obtain a correct diagnosis according to the features of the imaging results. Peripherin-2, bestrophin-1 (BEST1), inter photoreceptor matrix proteoglycan-1(IMPG1) and IMPG2 are the genes detected in adult-onset BVMD (5,8). These genes may be used as markers for the diagnosis of adult-onset BVMD if it manifests with adulthood macular degeneration, a variable degree of electrooculography (EOG) suppression. The present study aimed to address the clinical, histological, genetic, imaging and functional characteristics of adult-onset BVMD and further aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of adult-onset BVMD and its putative causes.

To this end, multimodal imaging and genetic analysis were combined to determine the clinical manifestations and genetic characteristics of four advanced-age Chinese patients with adult-onset BVMD.

Patients and methods

Study subjects and clinical examinations

All experimental protocols and methods were approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China). Written informed consent was obtained from all of the participants who were treated according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

A total of four older patients >50 years with suspected adult-onset BVMD were encountered at the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center (Guangzhou, China; between March 2017 and March 2021). Ophthalmic examinations were performed as follows: Visual acuity was examined using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart (Precision Vision). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed using a Cirrus HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec). Three patients (Patients no. 1, 2 and 4) underwent OCT. Fundus photography and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) imaging were performed using a Heidelberg Retina Angiograph (Heidelberg Engineering). EOG was recorded in all patients and these tests were performed in conformity with the guidelines of the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision standards (9). Physical examination was performed to exclude any systemic diseases.

Sample collection and mutation screening

Venous blood samples were collected from these four patients, their family members and 200 subjects without BVMD from the same region (Guangdong, China). The normal control presented in the Results section is a 50-year-old male, recruited by volunteering in November 2017. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes using standard protocols. Exons of the BEST1 gene were amplified by PCR using primers (Table I) as previously described (8,10). PCR was performed in 50-µl reactions. Amplification included a single 5-min step at 94˚C, followed by 40 cycles of 94˚C for 45 sec, 58-61˚C for 45 sec and 72˚C for 45 sec, and a final 10-min step at 72˚C. The PCR products were sequenced in both directions using an ABI3730 Automated Sequencer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The sequencing results were analyzed using Seqman (version 2.3; Technelysium Pty., Ltd.) and compared with the reference sequences in the database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI; NC_000011.10).

Table I

Primers used for the amplification of the exons of bestrophin-1and product sizes.

Table I

Primers used for the amplification of the exons of bestrophin-1and product sizes.

ExonForward (5'-3')Reverse (5'-3')Product size, bpAnnealing temperature, ˚C
2 AGTCTCAGCCATCTCCTCGC TGGCCTGTCTGGAGCCTG21261
3 GGGACAGTCTCAGCCATCTC CAGCTCCTCGTGATCCTCC23858
4 AGAAAGCTGGAGGAGCCG GCGGCAGCCCTGTCTGTAC140859
5 GGGGCAGGTGGTGTTCAGA GGCAGCCTCACCAGCCTAG15059
6 GGGCAGGTGGTGTTCAGA CCTTGGTCCTTCTAGCCTCAG18159
7 CATCCTGATTTCAGGGTTCC CTCTGGCCATGCCTCCAG25759
8 AGCTGAGGTTTAAAGGGGGA TCTCTTTGGGTCCACTTTGG21559
9 ACATACAAGGTCCTGCCTGG GCATTAACTAGTGCTATTCTAAGTTCC29859
10A GGTGTTGGTCCTTTGTCCAC CTCTGGCATATCCGTCAGGT59159
10B CTTCAAGTCTGCCCCACTGT TAGGCTCAGAGCAAGGGAAG45759
11 CATTTTGGTATTTGAAATGAAGG CCATTTGATTCAGGCTGTTG21659

To analyze the effect of missense variants, polymorphism phenotyping (PolyPhen; http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/) and sorting intolerant from tolerant (SIFT; http://sift.jcvi.org/) were used to predict the possible impact of an amino acid substitution on the structure and function of the protein using straight forward physical and comparative considerations. Variants were considered to be pathogenic when at least one of the two programs predicted a deleterious effect of amino acid substitution on protein structure and function. The Human Gene Mutation Database (http://www.hgmd.org/) was used to screen for mutations reported in published studies. HomoloGene (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/homologene) was used to check whether the mutated amino acid residues were conserved across different species.

Results

Clinical findings

All patients were from southern China. A 62-year-old female patient (Patient no. 1; Fig. 1) had no known familial history of ocular diseases. Her best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/100 in both eyes, which was not possible to be corrected. The cornea was transparent and there were certain opacities in the lens. Fundus examination indicated that certain pigments in the macular area and the fovea reflex were negative (Fig. 1A and D) compared to anormal control subject (Fig. 1H). OCT scans revealed that the foveal region was abnormally thick in both eyes due to neuroretinal detachment from the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE; Fig. 1B and E), which was likely triggered by the abnormal accumulation of subretinal fluid compared to the normal control (Fig. 1I). FFA indicated pooling of fluorescein dye in the cystoid spaces in the late phase of fluorescein angiography, which may have been caused by the RPE defect (Fig. 1C and F). The Arden ratio (light peak/dark trough) was markedly reduced to <1.6. Chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) was initially diagnosed and the patient was treated with photodynamic therapy (PDT) with no clinical response.

A 50-year-old male patient's (Patient no. 2; Fig. 2) BVCA was 20/80 in both eyes. The cornea and lens were transparent. Fundus photographs revealed round lesions in the macular area (Fig. 2A and D). OCT indicated serous retinal detachment (Fig. 2B and E). A fluorescein angiogram displayed hyperfluorescence in the macular area (Fig. 2C and F). The Arden ratio was reduced to <1.6. Chronic CSC was initially diagnosed and treated with PDT with no improvement in vision.

A 60-year-old male patient's (patient no. 3; Fig. 3) BCVA was 20/200 in the right eye and counting fingers (CF) at 30 cm (CF/30 cm) in the left eye. The cornea was transparent and there were certain opacities in the lens. Fundus examination indicated a yolk-like lesion in the macula of the right eye and an atrophic lesion in the left eye (Fig. 3A and C). FFA revealed a small amount of hyperfluorescence in the right eye, which may have been caused by the RPE defect, and certain hyperfluorescence in the macular area of the left eye corresponding to the region containing the atrophic lesion detected on color fundus photography (Fig. 3B and D). The Arden ratio was reduced to <1.8.

A 78-year-old male patient's (Patient no. 4; Fig. 4) BVCA was CF/20 cm in the right eye and CF/30 cm in the left eye. The cornea was transparent. Severe opacities in the left lens and an intraocular lens in the right eye with certain opacity in the posterior capsule were observed and the fundus photographs were therefore not very clear. Fundus photography indicated round lesions in the macular area and a venous loop in the inferior part of the optic nerve head (Fig. 4A and D). OCT scans revealed that serous retinal detachments with elongated photoreceptor outer segments were correlated with the size of the yellowish elevated lesion (Fig. 4B and E). A fluorescein angiogram revealed a region of blocked fluorescence in the foveal center surrounded by a transmission defect in the FFA (Fig. 4C and F). The Arden ratio was severely reduced to <1.4. Chronic CSC was diagnosed at first and the patient was treated with PDT with no improvement in vision.

One characteristic that was similar in all of the four patients was that it was difficult to obtain an accurate diagnosis due to the onset age of the disease and its atypical clinical manifestations. Hence, the genetic analysis results have an important role in adult-onset BVMD.

Mutation screening and bioinformatics analysis

In Patient no. 1, a heterozygous mutation, c.763C>T (p. Arg255Trp, p.R255W), was identified in exon 7 of BEST1 (Fig. 1G). In Patient no. 2, the mutation c.584C>T (p.Ala195Val, p.A195V) was identified in exon 5 of BEST1 (Fig. 2G). In Patient no. 3, the mutation c.910_912del GAT (p.Asp304del, p.D304del) was identified in exon 8 of BEST1 (Fig. 3E). In Patient no. 4, the mutation c.310G>C (p.Asp104His, p.D104H) was identified in exon 4 of the BEST1 gene (Fig. 4G). No equivalent mutations were detected in the family members of these subjects or the control subjects. SIFT predicted that the amino acid substitutions Arg255Trp, Ala195Val, and Asp104His in the BEST1 protein were damaging to its function (Fig. 5A-C). PolyPhen was not able to predict the effects of these four mutations.

Discussion

Adult-onset BVMD is one of the most prevalent forms of macular degeneration and was first described by Gass in 1974(4). Compared to juvenile-onset BVMD, adult-onset BVMD is less characterized and lacks strict diagnostic criteria. It was suggested that adult-onset BVMD typically occurs between 30 and 50 years of age (5). The patients in the present study were older than 50 years, similar to those in previous studies (7), indicating that adult-onset BVMD cannot be excluded in older patients with macular lesions.

The clinical symptoms of adult-onset BVMD are highly variable, but patients tend to remain asymptomatic until the 5th decade or may even remain asymptomatic throughout life (11). Atypical presentations, such as multifocal vitelliform lesions and the occurrence of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in various stages of the disease, may confound the diagnosis (8,12,13). In previous studies, the majority of cases had a negative family history of the disease (5), similar to the four cases in the present study. Furthermore, adult-onset BVMD-like lesions have been suggested to be associated with several additional phenotypes and pathologies, such as AMD (7) and chronic CSC (5,14). A study by Spaide et al (15) reported vitelliform lesions in three patients who were diagnosed with typical CSC. In this study, three patients were misdiagnosed with CSC, as the vitelliform lesions caused mechanical separation between the photoreceptors and RPE. Therefore, for patients with adult-onset BVMD, combining multimodal imaging and genetic examination is helpful for confirming the diagnosis when other causes of macular atrophy may be excluded (7,16-18).

BVMD is highly causally associated with mutations in the gene BEST1(19) which encodes BEST1. Human BEST1, identified in 1998, is a calcium-activated chloride channel in the RPE (11).

In addition to evaluating clinical and genetic manifestations of BVMD, the present study sought to investigate the correlations between genotypes and phenotypes in order to provide additional criteria for this disease for ophthalmologists to avoid an incorrect diagnosis. A study performed in Japan identified one patient with heterozygous variants of V239VfsX2/p.R255W, who presented mainly with macular edema and low amounts of subretinal fluid (Table II) (20) unlike what was detected in Patient no. 1 of the present study. First, the phenotypes of compound heterozygous mutations and those associated with this one mutation maybe different. Furthermore, the patients in the Japanese study had juvenile-onset BVMD, which may differ from adult-onset BVMD, which was the focus of the present study. Furthermore, the p.R255W mutation may not be related to subretinal fluid, which is reasonable because BVMD involves 4-5 stages. Wong et al (21) reported another patient, an 8-year-old male with BVMD and CNV (Table II). Tian et al (22) and another study (23) from the glaucoma division of our hospital also identified that certain patients with p.R255W had angle-closure glaucoma in addition to macular lesions (Table II). Thus, these results may confirm that addressing the role of p.R255Win BVMD is important in both juvenile-onset and adult-onset BVMD and may present with numerous clinical features, which makes it a hot topic in the field. According to the protein structure of BEST1, amino acid 255 is positioned at the margin of the cell membrane (19); p.R255W therefore deserves further research regarding the mechanism by which it contributes to BVMD (24).

Table II

Comparison of clinical features of the same mutation between the present study and other studies.

Table II

Comparison of clinical features of the same mutation between the present study and other studies.

Study (year)MutationRegionSexAge (years)Visual acuityFundus appearance(Refs.)
Present studyp.R255W (heterozygous) Patient no. 1Asia (China)F62OU: 20/100Pigmentation in the macular area-
Kubota et al, 2016V239VfsX2/p.R255W (heterozygous)Asia (Japan)M25OD: 0.9 OS: 0.3 (decimal)Cystoid macular lesions and multiple yellowish deposits(20)
Wong et al, 2010p.R255W (heterozygous)Asia (China)M8OD: 20/200 OS: 20/30OD: CNV OS: Vitelliruptive(21)
Tian et al, 2017p.R255W (heterozygous)Asia (China)NSNSNSDiffuse yellowish lesion in the macula; the C/D ratio was 0.8(22)
Luo et al, 2019p.R255W (homozygous, heterozygous)Asia (China)NSNSNSAngle-closure glaucoma and macular lesion(23)
Present studyp.A195V (heterozygous) Patient no. 2Asia (China)M50OU: 20/80Round lesions in the macular area-
Katagiri et al, 2015p.A195V (heterozygous)Asia (Japan)M50OD:1.2 OS:1.0 (decimal)OD: Vitelliruptive stage OS: Vitelliruptive stage(25)
Tian et al, 2014p.A195V/p.R255W (heterozygous)Asia (China)NS25OD: 20/50 OS: 20/40OD: Pseudohypopyon OS: Vitelliform lesion(27)
Present studyp.D304del (heterozygous) Patient no. 3Asia (China)M60OD: 20/200 OS:CF/30 cmOD: Yolk-like lesion in the macula OS: Atrophic lesion-
Katagiri et al, 2015p.D304del (heterozygous)Asia (Japan)M56OD:0.15 OS:1.2 (decimal)OD: Atrophic stage OS: Vitelliform stage(25)
Present studyp.D104H (heterozygous) Patient no. 4Asia (China)M78CF/20 cm OD CF/30 cm OSRound lesions in the macular area-
Krämer et al, 2003p.D104H (heterozygous)Germany NSNSNS(31)

[i] F, female; M, male; CNV, choroidal neovascularization; OU, both eyes; OD, right eye; OS, left eye; CF, counting fingers; NS, not specified.

The variant p.A195V had been previously reported in a 50-year-old Japanese male with adult-onset BVMD (Table II) (25), whose vision was much better than that of Patient no. 2 in the present study, although both patients were 50-year-old males. Lee et al (26) determined that 293T cells transfected with a p.A195V mutant produced significantly smaller currents than cells transfected with the wild-type gene. Tian et al (27) also reported a case of the compound mutation p.A195V/p.R255W in a young patient with good vision, which may indicate that the compound mutation is not as severe as the single mutation, similar to the results of a previous study (28). It may be suggested that the reason is that certain mutations increase Cl-currents but that others decrease Cl-currents.

To the best of our knowledge, as for Patient no. 3 of the present study, only one previous study by Katagiri et al (25) detected the c.910_912del GAT mutation in a 56-year-old Japanese male. Although c.910G>A (p.Asp304Asn) was identified by another investigator, no detailed description was provided (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/496689/). These results indicated that Asp in this position is important for the function of the whole protein. According to the structure of the BEST1 protein (8,29,30), the amino acids in positions 301-304 are all Asp and all mutations at these sites cause BVMD, which may indicate that the structure of several continuous residues of the same amino acid is easily damaged.

The c.310G>C (p.Asp104His, p.D104H) mutation in exon 4 is also a recurrent mutation, as reported by Krämer et al (31) (Table II). The Asp104 residue is highly conserved among other species, including nematodes and fruit flies. Finally, codon 104 has previously been indicated to be affected by a mutational change that altered the asparagine residue to a glutamic residue (Asp104Glu) (32). Taken together, these data indicate that Asp104 is likely to be the causative agent of BVMD.

Currently, no validated therapy is available for restoration of the normal contact between the photoreceptors and the RPE and/or for facilitating safe lesion absorption (5). Ergun et al (33) reported that PDT had no beneficial effect on the vision of patients with BVMD, suggesting that severe adverse effects were associated with this treatment. In the present study, Patients no. 1, 2 and 4 were treated with PDT without any favorable outcomes. The prognosis of adult-onset BVMD is poor, as visual impairment and legal blindness may occur, as was observed in the present study. Gene therapy is the most promising option for treating monogenic forms of BVMD prior to fluid-induced rod cell death (11,34).

Certain limitations of the present study should be noted. First, the sample size of the included subjects was limited because of the rarity of adult-onset BVMD. Furthermore, no longitudinal study was performed and therefore, it was not possible to assess the temporal trends of these changes during aging.

In summary, by combining multimodal imaging and genetic examination, adult-onset BVMD was confirmed in four patients. These results expand the mutation spectrum of BEST1and may be helpful in genetic and clinical counseling to correctly diagnose patients with adult-onset BVMD. In addition, the characterization of these patients with adult-onset BVMD in the present study provides a basis for future investigations of the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis and for the development of therapeutic interventions.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 82070972).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

YLin, TL, BL, CJ and LL analyzed and interpreted the patient data. CL, YLian, YH, QW, HL and JL examined the patients and performed PCR and gene sequence analysis. YLin, JL and HL interpreted the sequencing data, drafted the manuscript and revised it critically. YLin and LL confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center (Guangzhou, China). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Patient consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication was obtained from all participants.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

MacDonald IM and Lee T: Best vitelliform macular dystrophy. In: GeneReviews((R)). Adam MP, Ardinger HH and Pagon RA (eds). University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 1993.

2 

Katz MS, Walsh EK and Medow NB: Vitelliform macular dystrophy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 132(1098)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Tsang SH and Sharma T: Best vitelliform macular dystrophy. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1085:157–158. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Gass JD: A clinicopathologic study of a peculiar foveomacular dystrophy. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 72:139–156. 1974.PubMed/NCBI

5 

Chowers I, Tiosano L, Audo I, Grunin M and Boon CJ: Adult-onset foveomacular vitelliform dystrophy: A fresh perspective. Prog Retin Eye Res. 47:64–85. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Jun I, Lee JS, Lee JH, Lee CS, Choi SI, Gee HY, Lee MG and Kim EK: Adult-onset vitelliform macular dystrophy caused by BEST1 p.Ile38Ser mutation is a mild form of best vitelliform macular dystrophy. Sci Rep. 7(9146)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Toto L, Borrelli E, Mastropasqua R, Di Antonio L, Mattei PA, Carpineto P and Mastropasqua L: Adult-onset foveomacular vitelliform dystrophy evaluated by means of optical coherence tomography angiography: A comparison with dry age-related macular degeneration and healthy eyes. Retina. 38:731–738. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Lin Y, Li T, Ma C, Gao H, Chen C, Zhu Y, Liu B, Lian Y, Huang Y, Li H, et al: Genetic variations in bestrophin-1 and associated clinical findings in two Chinese patients with juvenile-onset and adult-onset best vitelliform macular dystrophy. Mol Med Rep. 17:225–233. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Constable PA, Bach M, Frishman LJ, Jeffrey BG and Robson AG: International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision. ISCEV standard for clinical electro-oculography (2017 update). Doc Ophthalmol. 134:1–9. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Lin Y, Li T, Gao H, Lian Y, Chen C, Zhu Y, Li Y, Liu B, Zhou W, Jiang H, et al: Bestrophin 1 gene analysis and associated clinical findings in a Chinese patient with best vitelliform macular dystrophy. Mol Med Rep. 16:4751–4755. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Yang T, Justus S, Li Y and Tsang SH: BEST1: The best target for gene and cell therapies. Mol Ther. 23:1805–1809. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Shahzad R and Siddiqui MA: Choroidal neovascularization secondary to best vitelliform macular dystrophy detected by optical coherence tomography angiography. J AAPOS. 21:68–70. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Stattin M, Ahmed D, Glittenberg C, Krebs I and Ansari-Shahrezaei S: Optical coherence tomography angiography for the detection of secondary choroidal neovascularization in vitelliform macular dystrophy. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 14:49–52. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Giuffrè C, Miserocchi E, Modorati G, Carnevali A, Marchese A, Querques L, Querques G and Bandello F: Central serous chorioretinopathylike mimicking multifocal vitelliform macular dystrophy: An ocular side effect of mitogen/extracellular signal-regulated kinase inhibitors. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 12:172–176. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Spaide RF, Noble K, Morgan A and Freund KB: Vitelliform macular dystrophy. Ophthalmology. 113:1392–1400. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Lima de Carvalho JR Jr, Paavo M, Chen L, Chiang J, Tsang SH and Sparrow JR: Multimodal imaging in best vitelliform macular dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 60:2012–2022. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Querques G, Bux AV, Prato R, Iaculli C, Souied EH and Noci ND: Correlation of visual function impairment and optical coherence tomography findings in patients with adult-onset foveomacular vitelliform macular dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol. 146:135–142. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Bitner H, Schatz P, Mizrahi-Meissonnier L, Sharon D and Rosenberg T: Frequency, genotype, and clinical spectrum of best vitelliform macular dystrophy: Data from a national center in Denmark. Am J Ophthalmol. 154:403–412.e4. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Boon CJ, Klevering BJ, Leroy BP, Hoyng CB, Keunen JE and den Hollander AI: The spectrum of ocular phenotypes caused by mutations in the BEST1 gene. Prog Retin Eye Res. 28:187–205. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Kubota D, Gocho K, Akeo K, Kikuchi S, Sugahara M, Matsumoto CS, Shinoda K, Mizota A, Yamaki K, Takahashi H and Kameya S: Detailed analysis of family with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy associated with new BEST1 mutation. Doc Ophthalmol. 132:233–243. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Wong RL, Hou P, Choy KW, Chiang SW, Tam PO, Li H, Chan WM, Lam DS, Pang CP and Lai TY: Novel and homozygous BEST1 mutations in Chinese patients with best vitelliform macular dystrophy. Retina. 30:820–827. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Tian L, Sun T, Xu K, Zhang X, Peng X and Li Y: Screening of BEST1 gene in a Chinese cohort with best vitelliform macular dystrophy or autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 58:3366–3375. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Luo J, Lin M, Guo X, Xiao X, Li J, Hu H, Xiao H, Xu X, Zhong Y, Long S, et al: Novel BEST1 mutations and special clinical characteristics of autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy in Chinese patients. Acta Ophthalmol. 97:247–259. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Milenkovic VM, Rivera A, Horling F and Weber BH: Insertion and topology of normal and mutant bestrophin-1 in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. J Biol Chem. 282:1313–1321. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Katagiri S, Hayashi T, Ohkuma Y, Sekiryu T, Takeuchi T, Gekka T, Kondo M, Iwata T and Tsuneoka H: Mutation analysis of BEST1 in Japanese patients with Best's vitelliform macular dystrophy. Br J Ophthalmol. 99:1577–1582. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Lee CS, Jun I, Choi SI, Lee JH, Lee MG, Lee SC and Kim EK: A novel BEST1 mutation in autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 56:8141–8150. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Tian R, Yang G, Wang J and Chen Y: Screening for BEST1 gene mutations in Chinese patients with bestrophinopathy. Mol Vis. 20:1594–1604. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

28 

Johnson AA, Bachman LA, Gilles BJ, Cross SD, Stelzig KE, Resch ZT, Marmorstein LY, Pulido JS and Marmorstein AD: Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy is not associated with the loss of bestrophin-1 anion channel function in a patient with a novel BEST1 mutation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 56:4619–4630. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Hartzell HC, Qu Z, Yu K, Xiao Q and Chien LT: Molecular physiology of bestrophins: Multifunctional membrane proteins linked to best disease and other retinopathies. Physiol Rev. 88:639–672. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Tsunenari T, Sun H, Williams J, Cahill H, Smallwood P, Yau KW and Nathans J: Structure-function analysis of the bestrophin family of anion channels. J Biol Chem. 278:41114–41125. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Krämer F, Mohr N, Kellner U, Rudolph G and Weber BH: Ten novel mutations in VMD2 associated with best macular dystrophy (BMD). Hum Mutat. 22(418)2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Petrukhin K, Koisti MJ, Bakall B, Li W, Xie G, Marknell T, Sandgren O, Forsman K, Holmgren G, Andreasson S, et al: Identification of the gene responsible for best macular dystrophy. Nat Genet. 19:241–247. 1998.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Ergun E, Costa D, Slakter J, Yannuzzi LA and Stur M: Photodynamic therapy and vitelliform lesions. Retina. 24:399–406. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Guziewicz KE, Zangerl B, Komaromy AM, Iwabe S, Chiodo VA, Boye SL, Hauswirth WW, Beltran WA and Aguirre GD: Recombinant AAV-mediated BEST1 transfer to the retinal pigment epithelium: Analysis of serotype-dependent retinal effects. PLoS One. 8(e75666)2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

September-2021
Volume 22 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Lin Y, Li T, Liu B, Lyu C, Lian Y, Li J, Huang Y, Li H, Wu Q, Jin C, Jin C, et al: Multimodal imaging and genetic analysis of adult‑onset best vitelliform macular dystrophy in Chinese patients. Exp Ther Med 22: 1034, 2021
APA
Lin, Y., Li, T., Liu, B., Lyu, C., Lian, Y., Li, J. ... Lu, L. (2021). Multimodal imaging and genetic analysis of adult‑onset best vitelliform macular dystrophy in Chinese patients. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 22, 1034. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10466
MLA
Lin, Y., Li, T., Liu, B., Lyu, C., Lian, Y., Li, J., Huang, Y., Li, H., Wu, Q., Jin, C., Lu, L."Multimodal imaging and genetic analysis of adult‑onset best vitelliform macular dystrophy in Chinese patients". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 22.3 (2021): 1034.
Chicago
Lin, Y., Li, T., Liu, B., Lyu, C., Lian, Y., Li, J., Huang, Y., Li, H., Wu, Q., Jin, C., Lu, L."Multimodal imaging and genetic analysis of adult‑onset best vitelliform macular dystrophy in Chinese patients". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 22, no. 3 (2021): 1034. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10466