Orthopedic surgery approach with uncemented metallic prosthesis in knee osteoarthritis increases the quality of life of young patients

  • Authors:
    • Bogdan Uivaraseanu
    • Simona Bungau
    • Delia Mirela Tit
    • Tapan Behl
    • Teodor Andrei Maghiar
    • Octavian Maghiar
    • Carmen Pantis
    • Dana Carmen Zaha
    • Jenel M. Patrascu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 23, 2021     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.9973
  • Article Number: 541
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Osteoarthritis is mainly located in the knee area. It is an important concern related to the population health, determined by the influence on the quality of life of patients. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with uncemented fixation is among the most encountered procedures performed in patients of a younger age. The present study investigated the response of patients (quality of life, mobility and pain management) with titanium/hydroxyapatite‑coated implants with polyethylene inserts. A total of 57 patients with knee arthroplasty were studied with an average age of 54.1±4.9 years and 57.8% were females. The present study focused on the following aspects: The components of such a prosthesis and the way they contribute to a physiological fixation/recovery; how the implant surgery is performed; the clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients; postoperative pain assessment in different types of movement; the management of the movement capacity 1 year after the surgery; and complications that may occur. One year after the surgery, these patients reported pain release, considerably favorable results in every‑day activities, and good mobility (capable of using the car, rising from the bed or standing). Knowledge and accurate observation of the correct steps in performing this surgery and the role of the components of the prosthesis can lead to favorable therapeutic outcomes for patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Introduction

The most frequent rheumatic pathology is osteoarthritis; the knee joint being the most often affected area. Osteoarthritis at the knee joint level, also known as knee osteoarthritis, determines considerable function disabilities and also handicaps. Considering the influence on the quality of life of patients, knee osteoarthritis is an important issue for the population health, not to mention the increased cost in the social and economic sectors (1,2). Due to population aging, osteoarthritis affects up to 30% of people >65 years of age; 10% of males and 17% of females over the age of 65 are affected (1,2). It is among the 4 main causes of morbidity, being the most frequent cause of knee pain after the age of 50, as an effect of obesity and overweight as well as the ageing of the population (1-3). Due to its incidence and increased prevalence rate, knee osteoarthritis is more significant than other categories of osteoarthritis; mainly affecting obese females of a young age (3,4). As the age group of the population cases decreases, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasingly carried out on subjects of a younger age (5-8). Various authors have indicated that the average age of the patients submitted to TKA is reducing and the ratio of subjects below 65 years is growing (7). For orthopedic surgeons, young subjects represent a difficulty due to the fact that they resume their activities at a quick rate after surgery and also because their lifespan is greater than older patients (6,7). For patients in their 50s, there is a greater probability of enthusiasm compared to patients in their 30s concerning an implant which has a survivability of 5 to 10 years (5). As patients of younger age have a greater rate of activity, increased pressure will be put on the implant, thus correction surgery is a probable outcome (7,8). Therefore, TKA has to ensure a favorable outcome and durability as well as maintain to the greatest extent possible the bone (8).

Uncemented attachment of the orthopedic implants is properly verified and has effective functioning in various areas. The connection linking the bone and the implant is physiological and it is a vivid interface that reacts to pressure in a physiological way. The knee implant with cemented attachment does not always succeed and in various cases the uncemented attachment has been revealed to be superior to the cemented attachment (5,8). As a result of design and material improvements (9-12), uncemented attachment is becoming the first option for numerous surgeons, due to demographic changes in the population with TKA (7,8). There are several conditions that influence the direct skeletal fixation: The characteristics of the implant surface (13,14); the host bone condition; the set-up of the operation site; loading circumstances; design of the implant (13,15,16); and avoidance of initial and chronic infections. To obtain high quality TKA, polymers with biostability and also several metals and ceramics are used. The material of prosthesis minimizes pressure at all surfaces and optimizes the function of the knee, reproducing the physiological femoral rollback (14,16).

The purpose of the present research was to assess the progress of subjects after uncemented TKA: The way they managed the pain, how they gained their mobility in everyday life, and how they improved daily activities. The present study contributed to the orthopedic literature data by emphasizing the benefits of uncemented knee arthroplasty in younger patients, with favorable bone preservation.

Materials and methods

Characteristics of the implant

The femoral component of the prosthesis (C2F Implants) was cobalt-chromium material. Models of cementless prosthesis that offer initial stability and favor instant osteointegration are provided for right and left knees, in available sizes, twice covered with stratums of high porosity titanium and hydroxyapatite plasma sprayed (13-17). The femoral box open-top permits reverse insertion of an intramedullary nail for patients with supracondylar fracture condition. The weight of the component is reduced with 25-30% when ridges are configured in the lateral condyles. Physiological kinematics replicates natural femoral roll-back and allows deep flexion occurrence. The tibial component is also cobalt-chromium tibial tray 5 sizes available in uncemented version covered twice with stratums of high porosity titanium and hydroxyapatite plasma sprayed (17-19), which offers initial stability and favors instant osteointegration (20). The tibial tray, that is anatomically configured, matches each of the two knees (right and left). Keel conical core (which is hollow) is configured to accommodate the mobile bearing stem (21).

The rotatory plate is available in 5 sizes and 4 dimensions (9, 11, 13 and 15 mm). The stem is constituted of two sections (lower conical and upper cylindrical) having an overall height of 24.5 mm. The apex of the patella or the patellar tendon is secured against impact by the wide anterior cut-out. The size of the mobile bearing in relation to the tibial tray permits a rotation >20˚, whilst preventing the impact on the soft tissue in the size-to-size design. Unmatching patterns are permitted for the femoral element and the tibial tray. Despite that, the dimension of the mobile bearing has to fit the femoral component dimension. The patella is formed by a sphere portion cut following an oval contour and equipped with 2 markers; the patellar component has to be cemented (21).

The polyethylene insert has a protective role between the two metal components (tibial and femoral, respectively), keeping the joint biomechanics as close as possible to the physiological ones (due to the elasticity of the material) and avoiding the direct contact between the mentioned metal components. Improper implantation of the prosthesis leads to premature attrition of the polyethylene insert. In addition, the wrong selection for the polyethylene insert size has the effect of shortening both the amplitude of joint movements and the life of the prosthesis. As a consequence, one of the most common complications of incorrect implantation is fracture (rupture) of the polyethylene insert.

Study design

A prospective study, including 57 patients admitted with the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis at the Department of Orthopedics of Clinical County Emergency Hospital of Oradea (Oradea, Romania) from January 2016 to January 2020, was performed. The selection criteria of the patients are presented in Table I. Before TKA, the patients completed surveys of demographic data and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) (22) pain scale, which represents a frequently used tool to evaluate the pain in case of osteoarthritis of the knee. The WOMAC Index assesses pain during functional activities; it includes 5 items that evaluate pain when the patient walks on flat surface, up and down stairs, when standing upright, lying or sitting and when in bed at night. The results are registered on a five-point Likert scale; a greater score indicates a higher level of pain. The scale has been demonstrated to be accurate and trustworthy in evaluating pain in cases of patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis (8).

Table I

Inclusion/exclusion criteria for selection of patients.

Table I

Inclusion/exclusion criteria for selection of patients.

Criteria
InclusionExclusion
Age ≤65 years oldNeurological problems
Daily active patientsPresence of osteoporosis
Good bone qualitySevere heart diseases in medical history
Uncemented arthroplasty in personal medical historySevere comorbidities
No severe deformities on radiography evaluationAnother bone joint with arthritis Bone not suitable for uncemented arthroplasty

The present research was authorized by the Ethics Commission of the Emergency Clinical County Hospital of Oradea (approval no. 176/2015), and conducted respecting the World Medical Association (WMA) Code of Ethics (Declaration of Helsinki 1967) (23). Each patient signed an informed written consent at the moment of hospitalization.

Surgical techniques

There are 3 usable bone references, as follows: i) The trans-epicondylar axis. The line connecting the external epicondyle with the groove right under the internal epicondyle is known as the trans-epicondylar axis (TEA). Various research has revealed difficulties in precisely identifying TEA (4-7). Using this method an error >5˚ was revealed in 56% of cases (14). ii) The antero-posterior axis. The white-side line connects the middle of the intercondylar notch with the lowest point of the femoral trochlea at the site of PCL insertion. Being perpendicular to TEA, the aforementioned line is easily detected. In case of bone deformation, it is modified and determines errors in external rotation, in cases of varus knee osteoarthritis or trochlear dysplasia (16). iii) The posterior condylar axis. The normal knee presents an internal rotation of 3-4˚ of the posterior condylar axis in relation to the TEA, while an external rotation with 3-4˚ in relation to the posterior condyles ensures correct rotational alignment; mistaken external condyle hypoplasia may appear in valgus knee osteoarthritis while in varus knee cases, the anterior cruciate ligament deficiency produces erosion of the medial femoral condyle rear part (14-16).

Results

The average age of the subjects was 54.1±.4.9 years. In addition, 36 patients were overweight, 14 of them were obese. The clinical characteristics of the patients, hip knee arthroplasty angle pre-operator (varus or valgus), etiology, and surgical approach are summarized in Table II.

Table II

Demographic and clinical characteristics.

Table II

Demographic and clinical characteristics.

 TKA patients (n=57)
CharacteristicsNo.%
Sex  
     Females3357.8
     Males2432.2
Age  
     <50 years712.28
     50-60 years3561.40
     >60 years1526.31
Average62.91±6.13
Previous surgery  
     CVI1628.07
     Gall bladder stone surgery610.52
     Cardiovascular surgery23.50
     Bariatric surgery35.26
Patient status  
     Normal2136.84
     Overweight2238.59
     Obesity1221.05
     Morbid obesity23.50
Etiology  
     Primary osteoarthritis3561.40
     Secondary osteoarthritis2239.60
Surgical approach  
     Medial approach57100
HKA angle pre-operator  
     Varus2238.6
     Valgus3561.4
Charnley classification  
     A unilateral knee arthritis3561.4
     B1 Unilateral TKA1322.8
     B2 Bilateral TKA712.3
     C3 Unilateral or bilateral TKA or THA23.5

[i] TKA, total knee arthroplasty; CVI, chronic venous insufficiency; HKA, hip-knee-ankle; THA, total hip arthroplasty.

Hydroxyapatite coating (10,14,16-18) acts by providing anchorage between the implant and the bony surface. The ability of the bone to adapt and connect to the hydroxyapatite layer of knee implants favors reliable osteointegration and the long-term survival of the implant. The surface of the implant has an important role in the direct skeletal fixation, porous implants being highly efficient for skeletal fixation. Radiographic assessment suggested excellent femoral component fixation. The pain scale 1 year after TKA is presented in Table III. Postoperatively, most of the patients had high movement ranges, compared with preoperative status, with a high level of mobility (Table IV). After 2 years surveillance, complication in TKA developed in 8 patients with minor influences, as revealed in Table V.

Table III

WOMAC score evolution 1-year after TKA.

Table III

WOMAC score evolution 1-year after TKA.

 Pre-operative patientsPost-operative (1 year) patients
WOMAC pain scoreNo.%No.%
Using stairs1831.5610.5
Weight bearing1322.858.7
Standing1119.323.5
Bathing4700
Using the toilet23.511.75
Shopping1526.358.7
Using the car35.211.75
Rising from bed610.511.75

[i] TKA, total knee arthroplasty; WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis.

Table IV

Pre-/post-operative range of motion.

Table IV

Pre-/post-operative range of motion.

 Pre-operative patientsPost-operative (1 year) patients
CharacteristicsNo.%No.%
Range of motion    
     >137915.7712.28
     129/136610.52915.7
     121/128712.28814
     113/1201017.54610.52
     105/112610.52610.52
     97/10423.5047
     <97712.281119.29
Flexum deformity    
     >154723.5
     11-151119.2911.75
     5-102238.5947
     <520355087.71

Table V

Complications of TKA.

Table V

Complications of TKA.

 Uncemented patients
ComplicationsNo.%
ROM <90˚ (3 months after treatment, under anesthesia by manipulation)23.50
Patellar clunk syndrome (treated by arthroscopic synovectomy)11.75
Stiffness (treated by arthroscopic arthrolysis)11.75
Loosening (treated by revision)23.50
Periprosthetic fracture (treated by internal fixation)23.5
Periprosthetic infection11.75

[i] TKA, total knee arthroplasty; ROM, range of motion.

Discussion

The most common articular disorder worldwide is osteoarthritis, whose prevalence is increasing. It is also one of the most common causes of disability, pain and loss of function in adults in Western populations. Regarding the risk of knee osteoarthritis during life, it is approximately 47% in women and 40% in men (2). Detailed physical examination, as well as extensive knowledge of the history of a patient, adequate radiological investigations are relevant for patient management. In terms of treatment, a gradual algorithmic approach is possible due to the fact that the disease has a relatively slow evolution. The non-surgical therapies include lifestyle adjustments, using orthotic devises and patient education. These may be obtained within the community. Arthroscopy, joint sparing procedures, joint replacement procedures and osteotomy are the surgical alternatives for this condition. The interventions for replacing the joint may be total as in knee arthroplasty or addressing a single area, as in patellofemoral arthroplasty or single-area knee replacement. In order to obtain optimal long-term results, a good surgical technique, proper selection of the patients and also postoperative counseling are essential (20,22). The uncemented implants have been demonstrated to be efficient in young patients (7,8), in those with rheumatic disease (24), in obese/diabetic patients, despite the increased risk for postoperative complications. Preoperative evaluation and/or control of associated complications of diabetes may improve the clinical outcome of TKA in these patients. The findings of the present research were in accordance with the replacement of the posterior cruciate ligament and the use of mobile inserts. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) revealed 1 mm migration of the tibial part of the non-cemented prosthesis during the first three months from the implant, which stabilized at approximately a year from the implant. Being related to bone density, the migration has a higher rate in case of patients with osteoporosis (19,25).

Various data have revealed increased hemorrhage following the uncemented implants, the cement acting as bone hemostatic (18,19). However, other studies have confirmed that the non-cemented prosthesis permits releasing of the tourniquet before the implantation, with more precise hemostasis, given improved visibility on the posterior capsule (26). The uncemented technique requires increased precision and accuracy in preparing the bone and balancing the soft tissue; this type of procedure proving to be beneficial for bone conservation and efficient for the operation (7). A major recommendation in case of uncemented TKA refers to the bone quality and its metabolic activity to provide biological fixation (27). The uncemented TKA procedure is fast, it reduces the duration of pneumatic ischemia and allows an easier control in case of malfunction. Prostheses of new generation provide improved osteointegration favoring biological connection of the bone with the prosthetic component that generates better results in time (7). Hydroxyapatite coatings, trabecular and porous metal are the most reliable materials used for these prostheses (17-19). Young patients are a major challenge for orthopedic surgeons, because their life expectancy is higher than elderly patients, and they also have a higher activity level (6-8). Due to the higher activity level of the younger patients, the implant is subjected to greater stress and a probable consequence is revision surgery. The results of the present study indicated accelerated postoperative recovery, with significant improvement in mobility and pain after TKA surgery. One-year post surgery, patients who underwent TKA surgery with an uncemented implant, exhibited alleviation of the pain with markedly favorable results in daily activity, and lack of pain when using the car, rising from bed or standing. After 1-year follow-up, most of them asserted the lack of the presence of the pain, they had, at the examination period, good range of motion of the knee with individually free range off-motion included.

Similar to other medical interventions, TKA could be accompanied by some complications (e.g., periprosthetic infection). The risk of microbial contamination and infection at the operative site is lowest in the knee prosthesis surgery. The incidence ranges between 6.1% (28) and <1% (29). Despite the intravenous followed by oral antimicrobial therapy, in the present study, a single case was complicated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus periprosthetic infection. The management of these infections could be improved in order to reduce the incidence and avoid the development of antimicrobial resistance (30,31). The components of uncemented TKA (in terms of materials) allows a biological healing on the bone/prothesis interface, that also is in the favor of the patient because of the short period of recovery (27,32,33). In future, as a result of continuous advances in the fields of auxiliary materials, material science and system designing, the uncemented fixation in TKA will be considered as the first option for knee arthritis (34).

In conclusion, for patients under the age of 65 who require TKA, a desirable solution is knee prosthesis with uncemented fixation, where biological adherence to the bone is favored, unlike the case of a cemented implant, where the cement can be fragmented, and further revisions could be necessary. Considering all these advantages, orthopedic surgeons must be prepared to use the optimum implant technique for uncemented prostheses, considering the indications, limitations and possible complications of this type of intervention.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

All data are registered at the Clinical County Emergency Hospital of Oradea, Bihor, Romania.

Authors' contributions

BU, TAM, OM, CP and DCZ performed the surgical interventions and collected, analyzed and interpreted the patient data regarding pre- and post-surgery progress. DMT, SB, TB and JMP made substantial contributions to the conception of the work and interpretation of data and in addition, they drafted the manuscript and were major contributors in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript to be published. All the authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research was authorized by the Ethics Commission of the Emergency Clinical County Hospital of Oradea (approval no. 176/2015), Oradea, Romania, and conducted respecting the World Medical Association (WMA) Code of Ethics (Declaration of Helsinki 1967). Each patient signed and provided an informed written consent at the moment of hospitalization.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Zhao K, Kelly M and Bozic KJ: Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: National Projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 467:2606–2612. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Lethbridge-Cejku M, Schiller JS and Bernadel L: Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2002. Vital Health Stat. 10:1–151. 2004.PubMed/NCBI

3 

Murphy L, Schwartz TA, Helmick CG, Renner JB, Tudor G, Koch G, Dragomir A, Kalsbeek WD, Luta G and Jordan JM: Lifetime risk of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 59:1207–1213. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Jordan JM, Helmick CG, Renner JB, Luta G, Dragomir AD, Woodard J, Fang F, Schwartz TA, Abbate LA, Callahan LF, et al: Prevalence of knee symptoms and radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in African Americans and Caucasians: The Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. J Rheumatol. 34:172–180. 2007.PubMed/NCBI

5 

Mont MA, Pivec R, Issa K, Kapadia BH, Maheshwari A and Harwin SF: Long-term implant survivorship of cementless total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. J Knee Surg. 27:369–376. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Robertsson O, Bizjajeva S, Fenstad AM, Furnes O, Lidgren L, Mehnert F, Odgaard A, Pedersen AB and Havelin LI: Knee arthroplasty in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Acta Orthop. 81:82–89. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Keeney JA, Eunice S, Pashos G, Wright RW and Clohisy JC: What is the evidence for total knee arthroplasty in young patients? A Systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 469:574–583. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Diduch DR, Insall JN, Scott WN, Scuderi GR and Font-Rodriguez D: Total knee replacement in young, active patients. Long-term follow-up and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 79:575–582. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Maries GRE, Bungau C, Chira D, Costea T and Mosteanu D: Study on the influence of the grind percentage over the surface hardness and modulus of elasticity of parts made of ABS, P6.6 and POM through Nanoindentation. Mater Plast. 56:65–70. 2019.

10 

Maries GRE, Chira D, Bungau C, Costea T and Moldovan L: Determining the influence of the processing temperature by injection and of the subsequent pressure on the surface's hardness and indentation modulus of the products made of HDPE, PMMA, PC+ABS through nanoindentation-G-series basic hardness modulus at a depth method. Mater Plast. 54:214–220. 2017.

11 

Chira D, Maries GRE and Bungau C: The influence of subsequent pressure of (HDPE), (PMMA), (PC+ABS) on some mechanical properties of items obtained through injection. Mater Plast. 52:572–577. 2015.

12 

Maries GRE, Chira D and Bungau C: The influence of processing temperatures of (HDPE), (PMMA), (PC+ABS) on some mechanical properties of items obtained through injection. Mater Plast. 54:452–456. 2015.

13 

Søballe K, Hansen ES, Brockstedt-Rasmussen H and Bünger C: Hydroxyapatite coating converts fibrous tissue to bone around loaded implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 75:270–278. 1993.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Søballe K and Overgaard S: The current status of hydroxyapatite coating of prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 78:689–691. 1996.PubMed/NCBI

15 

Dumitru N, Cocolos A, Caragheorgheopol A, Dumitrache C, Bratu OG, Neagu TP, Diaconu CC and Ghemigian A: Collagen-The ultrastructural element of the bone matrix. Rev Chim. 69:1706–1709. 2018.

16 

Voigt JD and Mosier M: Hydroxyapatite (HA) coating appears to be of benefit for implant durability of tibial components in primary total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 82:448–459. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Stephenson PK, Freeman MA, Revell PA, Germain J, Tuke M and Pirie CJ: The effect of hydroxyapatite coating on ingrowth of bone into cavities in an implant. J Arthroplasty. 6:51–58. 1991.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Beaupré LA, al-Yamani M, Huckell JR and Johnston DW: Hydroxyapatite-coated tibial implants compared with cemented tibial fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty. A randomized trial of outcomes at five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 89:2204–2211. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Akizuki S, Takizawa T and Horiuchi H: Fixation of a hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate-coated cementless knee prosthesis. Clinical and radiographic evaluation seven years after surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 85:1123–1127. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Brånemark R, Brånemark PI, Rydevik B and Myers RR: Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: A review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 38:175–811. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

21 

C2F IMPLANTS. http://www.c2f-implants.com/EN/index.php. Accessed Jul 20, 2020.

22 

Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J and Stitt LW: Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 15:1833–1840. 1988.PubMed/NCBI

23 

World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki. Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 277:925–926. 1997.PubMed/NCBI

24 

Tiglis M, Neagu TP, Elfara M, Diaconu CC, Bratu OG, Vacaroiu IA and Grintescu IM: Nefopam and its role in modulating acute and chronic pain. Rev Chim. 69:2877–2880. 2018.

25 

Tit DM, Bungau S, Iovan C, Nistor Cseppento DC, Endres L, Sava C, Sabau AM, Furau G and Furau C: Effects of the hormone replacement therapy and of soy isoflavones on bone resorption in postmenopause. J Clin Med. 7(297)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Kamath AF, Lee GC, Sheth NP, Nelson CL, Garino JP and Israelite CL: Prospective results of uncemented tantalum monoblock tibia in total knee arthroplasty: Minimum 5-year follow-up in patients younger than 55 years. J Arthroplasty. 26:1390–1395. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Koh CK, Zeng I, Ravi S, Zhu M, Vince KG and Young SW: Periprosthetic joint infection is the main cause of failure for modern knee arthroplasty: An analysis of 11,134 knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 475:2194–2201. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Namba RS, Inacio MC and Paxton EW: Risk factors associated with deep surgical site infections after primary total knee arthroplasty: An analysis of 56,216 knees. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 95:775–782. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Zaha DC, Bungau S, Uivarosan D, Tit DM, Maghiar TA, Maghiar O, Maghiar O, Pantis C, Fratila O, Rus M and Vesa CM: Antibiotic consumption and microbiological epidemiology in surgery departments: Results from a single study center. Antibiotics. 9(81)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Zaha DC, Bungau S, Aleya S, Tit DM, Vesa CM, Popa AR, Pantis C, Maghiar OA, Bratu OG, Furau C, et al: What antibiotics for what pathogens? The sensitivity spectrum of isolated strains in an intensive care unit. Sci Total Environ. 687:118–127. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Sibanda N, Copley LP, Lewsey JD, Borroff M, Gregg P, MacGregor AJ, Pickford M, Porter M, Tucker K and van der Meulen JH: Revision rates after primary hip and knee replacement in England between 2003 and 2006. PLoS Med. 5(e179)2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Gandhi R, Tsvetkov D, Davey JR and Mahomed NN: Survival and clinical function of cemented and uncemented prostheses in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surgery Br. 91:889–895. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Ritter MA and Meneghini RM: Twenty-year survivorship of cementless anatomic graduated component total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 25:507–513. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Gao F, Henricson A and Nilsson KG: Cemented versus uncemented fixation of the femoral component of the NexGen CR total knee replacement in patients younger than 60 years: A prospective randomised controlled RSA study. Knee. 16:200–206. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May-2021
Volume 21 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Uivaraseanu B, Bungau S, Tit DM, Behl T, Maghiar TA, Maghiar O, Pantis C, Zaha DC and Patrascu JM: Orthopedic surgery approach with uncemented metallic prosthesis in knee osteoarthritis increases the quality of life of young patients. Exp Ther Med 21: 541, 2021
APA
Uivaraseanu, B., Bungau, S., Tit, D.M., Behl, T., Maghiar, T.A., Maghiar, O. ... Patrascu, J.M. (2021). Orthopedic surgery approach with uncemented metallic prosthesis in knee osteoarthritis increases the quality of life of young patients. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 21, 541. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.9973
MLA
Uivaraseanu, B., Bungau, S., Tit, D. M., Behl, T., Maghiar, T. A., Maghiar, O., Pantis, C., Zaha, D. C., Patrascu, J. M."Orthopedic surgery approach with uncemented metallic prosthesis in knee osteoarthritis increases the quality of life of young patients". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 21.5 (2021): 541.
Chicago
Uivaraseanu, B., Bungau, S., Tit, D. M., Behl, T., Maghiar, T. A., Maghiar, O., Pantis, C., Zaha, D. C., Patrascu, J. M."Orthopedic surgery approach with uncemented metallic prosthesis in knee osteoarthritis increases the quality of life of young patients". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 21, no. 5 (2021): 541. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.9973