|
1
|
Yang G, Li W, Jiang H, Liang X, Zhao Y, Yu
D, Zhou L, Wang G, Tian H, Han F, et al: Low-dose radiation may be
a novel approach to enhance the effectiveness of cancer
therapeutics. Int J Cancer. 139:2157–2168. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
2
|
López R, García-Talavera M, Pardo R, Deban
L and Nalda JC: Natural radiation doses to the population in a
granitic region in Spain. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 111:83–88.
2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
Psichoudaki M and Papaefthymiou H: Natural
radioactivity measurements in the city of Ptolemais (Northern
Greece). J Environ Radioact. 99:1011–1017. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
4
|
Mc Laughlin JP: Some characteristics and
effects of natural radiation. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 167:2–7.
2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
5
|
Sankaran Pillai G, Chandrasekaran S,
Sivasubramanian K, Baskaran R and Venkatraman B: A review on
variation of natural radioactivity along the southeast coast of
Tamil Nadu for the past 4 decades (1974-2016). Radiat Prot
Dosimetry. 179:125–135. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Hosoda M, Nugraha ED, Akata N, Yamada R,
Tamakuma Y, Sasaki M, Kelleher K, Yoshinaga S, Suzuki T,
Rattanapongs CP, et al: A unique high natural background radiation
area-Dose assessment and perspectives. Sci Total Environ.
750(142346)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
7
|
Sreekumar A, Jayalekshmi PA, Nandakumar A,
Nair RRK, Ahammed R, Sebastian P, Koriyama C, Akiba S, Nakamura S
and Konishi J: Thyroid nodule prevalence among women in areas of
high natural background radiation, Karunagappally, Kerala, India.
Endocrine. 67:124–130. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
Omori Y, Hosoda M, Takahashi F, Sanada T,
Hirao S, Ono K and Furukawa M: Japanese population dose from
natural radiation. J Radiol Prot. 40:R99–R140. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
9
|
Kendall GM, Little MP and Wakeford R: A
review of studies of childhood cancer and natural background
radiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 97:769–781. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
10
|
Meulepas JM, Ronckers CM, Smets AMJB,
Nievelstein RAJ, Gradowska P, Lee C, Jahnen A, van Straten M, de
Wit MY, Zonnenberg B, et al: Radiation exposure from pediatric CT
scans and subsequent cancer risk in the Netherlands. J Natl Cancer
Inst. 111:256–263. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
11
|
Lee KH, Lee S, Park JH, Lee SS, Kim HY,
Lee WJ, Cha ES, Kim KP, Lee W, Lee JY and Lee KH: Risk of
hematologic malignant neoplasms from abdominopelvic computed
tomographic radiation in patients who underwent appendectomy. JAMA
Surg. 156:343–351. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
12
|
Feng ST, Law MW, Huang B, Ng S, Li ZP,
Meng QF and Khong PL: Radiation dose and cancer risk from pediatric
CT examinations on 64-slice CT: A phantom study. Eur J Radiol.
76:e19–e23. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
Griffey RT and Sodickson A: Cumulative
radiation exposure and cancer risk estimates in emergency
department patients undergoing repeat or multiple CT. AJR Am J
Roentgenol. 192:887–892. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
14
|
Journy NM, Lee C, Harbron RW, McHugh K,
Pearce MS and Berrington de González A: Projected cancer risks
potentially related to past, current, and future practices in
paediatric CT in the United Kingdom, 1990-2020. Br J Cancer.
116:109–116. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
15
|
Kuo W, Ciet P, Tiddens HA, Zhang W,
Guillerman RP and van Straten M: Monitoring cystic fibrosis lung
disease by computed tomography. Radiation risk in perspective. Am J
Respir Crit Care Med. 189:1328–1336. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
Journy N, Rehel JL, Ducou Le Pointe H, Lee
C, Brisse H, Chateil JF, Caer-Lorho S, Laurier D and Bernier MO:
Are the studies on cancer risk from CT scans biased by indication?
Elements of answer from a large-scale cohort study in France. Br J
Cancer. 112:185–193. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
17
|
Lehrer S and Rosenzweig KE: Lung cancer
hormesis in high impact states where nuclear testing occurred. Clin
Lung Cancer. 16:152–155. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
18
|
Dobrzyński L, Fornalski KW and Feinendegen
LE: Cancer mortality among people living in areas with various
levels of natural background radiation. Dose Response.
13(1559325815592391)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
19
|
Du X, Wang J and Zhu B: The frequencies of
x-ray examinations and CT scans: Findings from a sample
investigation in Jiangsu, China. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 190:38–44.
2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
20
|
Schultz CH, Fairley R, Murphy LS and Doss
M: The risk of cancer from CT scans and other sources of low-dose
radiation: A critical appraisal of methodologic quality. Prehosp
Disaster Med. 35:3–16. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
21
|
Viry A, Bize J, Trueb PR, Viry A, Bize J,
Trueb PR, Ott B, Racine D, Verdun FR and LeCoultre R: Annual
exposure of the Swiss population from medical imaging in 2018.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 195:289–295. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
22
|
Masjedi H, Zare MH, Keshavarz Siahpoush N,
Razavi-Ratki SK, Alavi F and Shabani M: European trends in
radiology: Investigating factors affecting the number of
examinations and the effective dose. Radiol Med. 125:296–305.
2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
23
|
Nekolla EA, Schegerer AA, Griebel J and
Brix G: Frequency and doses of diagnostic and interventional X-ray
applications: Trends between 2007 and 2014. Radiologe. 57:555–562.
2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In German).
|
|
24
|
Wachabauer D, Mathis-Edenhofer S and
Moshammer H: Medical radiation exposure from radiological and
interventional procedures in Austria. Wien Klin Wochenschr.
132:563–571. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
25
|
Bosch de Basea M, Espinosa A, Gil M,
Figuerola J, Pardina M, Vilar J and Cardis E: CT scan exposure in
Spanish children and young adults by socioeconomic status:
Cross-sectional analysis of cohort data. PLoS One.
13(e0196449)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
26
|
Bosch de Basea M, Salotti JA, Pearce MS,
Muchart J, Riera L, Barber I, Pedraza S, Pardina M, Capdevila A,
Espinosa A and Cardis E: Trends and patterns in the use of computed
tomography in children and young adults in Catalonia-results from
the EPI-CT study. Pediatr Radiol. 46:119–129. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
27
|
Dreger S, Krille L, Maier W, Pokora R,
Blettner M and Zeeb H: Regional deprivation and non-cancer related
computed tomography use in pediatric patients in Germany:
Cross-sectional analysis of cohort data. PLoS One.
11(e0153644)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
28
|
Pearce MS, Salotti JA, McHugh K, Kim KP,
Craft AW, Lubin J, Ron E and Parker L: Socio-economic variation in
CT scanning in Northern England, 1990-002. BMC Health Serv Res.
12(24)2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
29
|
Mettler FA Jr, Mahesh M,
Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Chambers CE, Elee JG, Frush DP, Miller DL,
Royal HD, Milano MT, Spelic DC, et al: Patient exposure from
radiologic and nuclear medicine procedures in the United States:
Procedure volume and effective dose for the period 2006-2016.
Radiology. 295:418–427. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
30
|
Rampinelli C, De Marco P, Origgi D,
Maisonneuve P, Casiraghi M, Veronesi G, Spaggiari L and Bellomi M:
Exposure to low dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening
and risk of cancer: Secondary analysis of trial data and
risk-benefit analysis. BMJ. 356(j347)2017.PubMed/NCBI View
Article : Google Scholar
|
|
31
|
Hoffman RM, Atallah RP, Struble RD and
Badgett RG: Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT: A
meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 35:3015–3025. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
32
|
de Koning HJ, van der Aalst CM, de Jong
PA, Scholten ET, Nackaerts K, Heuvelmans MA, Lammers JJ, Weenink C,
Yousaf-Khan U, Horeweg N, et al: Reduced lung-cancer mortality with
volume CT screening in a Randomized trial. N Engl J Med.
382:503–513. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
33
|
Hunger T, Wanka-Pail E, Brix G and Griebel
J: Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT in smokers: A systematic
review and meta-analysis. Diagnostics (Basel).
11(1040)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
34
|
Heuvelmans MA and Oudkerk M: Appropriate
screening intervals in low-dose CT lung cancer screening. Transl
Lung Cancer Res. 7:281–287. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
35
|
The 2007 Recommendations of the
International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP
publication 103. Ann ICRP. 37:1–332. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
36
|
Lakhwani OP, Dalal V, Jindal M and Nagala
A: Radiation protection and standardization. J Clin Orthop Trauma.
10:738–743. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
37
|
Miller DL: Make radiation protection a
habit. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 21:37–42. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
38
|
Boice J Jr, Dauer LT, Kase KR, Mettler FA
Jr and Vetter RJ: Evolution of radiation protection for medical
workers. Br J Radiol. 93(20200282)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
39
|
Biso SMR and Vidovich MI: Radiation
protection in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. J Thorac Dis.
12:1648–1655. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
40
|
Wagner JB: Radiation protection and safety
in interventional radiology. Radiol Technol. 91:431–442.
2020.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
41
|
Seki Y, Fukushima Y, Ando M, Yarita K,
Suto T and Tsushima Y: Exposure dose reduction for radiologists
with combination of angular beam modulation and radiation
protection drape in CT fluoroscopy: A phantom study. Nihon Hoshasen
Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 74:667–674. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In Japanese).
|
|
42
|
Dankerl P, May MS, Canstein C, Uder M and
Saake M: Cutting staff radiation exposure and improving freedom of
motion during CT interventions: Comparison of a novel workflow
utilizing a radiation protection cabin versus two conventional
workflows. Diagnostics (Basel). 11(1099)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
43
|
Lawson M, Kuganesan A, Parry G and Badawy
MK: The efficacy of Radpad as a radiation protection tool in CT
fluoroscopy guided lung biopsies. Radiat Prot Dosimetry.
191:328–334. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
44
|
Al Naemi H, Aly A, Kharita MH, Hilli SA,
Al Obadli A, Singh R, Rehani MM and Kalra MK: Multiphase
abdomen-pelvis CT in women of childbearing potential (WOCBP):
Justification and radiation dose. Medicine (Baltimore).
99(e18485)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
45
|
1990 Recommendations of the International
Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP. 21:1–201.
1991.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
46
|
Li M, Du Q, Duan L, Yang X, Zheng J, Jiang
H and Li M: Incorporation of residual attention modules into two
neural networks for low-dose CT denoising. Med Phys. 48:2973–2990.
2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
47
|
Epstein L, Koch J, Riemer T, Haquin G and
Orion I: An estimation of the exposure of the population of Israel
to natural sources of ionizing radiation. Radiat Prot Dosimetry.
176:264–268. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
48
|
Wall BF, Kendall GM, Edwards AA, Bouffler
S, Muirhead CR and Meara JR: What are the risks from medical X-rays
and other low dose radiation? Br J Radiol. 79:285–294.
2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
49
|
Chen JX, Kachniarz B, Gilani S and Shin
JJ: Risk of malignancy associated with head and neck CT in
children: A systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
151:554–566. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
50
|
Berrington de Gonzalez A, Daniels RD,
Cardis E, Cullings HM, Gilbert E, Hauptmann M, Kendall G, Laurier
D, Linet MS, Little MP, et al: Epidemiological studies of low-dose
ionizing radiation and cancer: Rationale and framework for the
monograph and overview of eligible studies. J Natl Cancer Inst
Monogr. 2020:97–113. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
51
|
Prasad KN, Cole WC and Haase GM: Radiation
protection in humans: Extending the concept of as low as reasonably
achievable (ALARA) from dose to biological damage. Br J Radiol.
77:97–99. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
52
|
Costello JE, Cecava ND, Tucker JE and Bau
JL: CT radiation dose: Current controversies and dose reduction
strategies. Am J Roentgenol. 201:1283–1290. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
53
|
Stewart RD, Carlson DJ, Butkus MP, Hawkins
R, Friedrich T and Scholz M: A comparison of mechanism-inspired
models for particle relative biological effectiveness (RBE). Med
Phys. 45:e925–e952. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
54
|
Ogbole GI: Radiation dose in paediatric
computed tomography: Risks and benefits. Ann Ib Postgrad Med.
8:118–126. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
55
|
Su YP, Niu HW, Chen JB, Fu YH, Xiao GB and
Sun QF: Radiation dose in the thyroid and the thyroid cancer risk
attributable to CT scans for pediatric patients in one general
hospital of China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 11:2793–2803.
2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
56
|
Brenner DJ and Hall EJ: Cancer risks from
CT scans: Now we have data, what next. Radiology. 265:330–331.
2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
57
|
Shakeel O, Pace N, Chambers TM, Scheurer
ME, Ganguly AA, Lupo PJ and Bunin GR: Medical radiation exposure
and risk of sporadic retinoblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer.
67(e28633)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
58
|
Frija G, Damilakis J, Paulo G, Loose R and
Vano E: European Society of Radiology (ESR). Cumulative effective
dose from recurrent CT examinations in Europe: Proposal for
clinical guidance based on an ESR EuroSafe Imaging survey. Eur
Radiol. 31:5514–5523. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
59
|
Siegel JA, Sacks B, Pennington CW and
Welsh JS: Dose optimization to minimize radiation risk for children
undergoing CT and nuclear medicine imaging is misguided and
detrimental. J Nucl Med. 58:865–868. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
