|
1
|
Siegel RL, Miller KD and Jemal A: Cancer
statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 70:7–30. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
2
|
Kimura T and Egawa S: Epidemiology of
prostate cancer in Asian countries. Int J Urol. 25:524–531.
2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
Streicher J, Meyerson BL, Karivedu V and
Sidana A: A review of optimal prostate biopsy: Indications and
techniques. Ther Adv Urol. 11(1756287219870074)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
4
|
Mottet N, van den Bergh RC and Briers E:
EAU-ESTRO-ESUR-IOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer 2019. European
Association of Urology Guidelines 2019 edition. Available from:
https://uroweb.org/guideline/prostate-cancer/.
|
|
5
|
Rosario DJ, Lane JA, Metcalfe C, Donovan
JL, Doble A, Goodwin L, Davis M, Catto JW, Avery K, Neal DE and
Hamdy FC: Short term outcomes of prostate biopsy in men tested for
cancer by prostate specific antigen: Prospective evaluation within
ProtecT study. BMJ. 344(d7894)2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Borghesi M, Ahmed H, Nam R, Schaeffer E,
Schiavina R, Taneja S, Weidner W and Loeb S: Complications after
systematic, random, and image-guided prostate biopsy. Eur Urol.
71:353–365. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
7
|
Das CJ, Razik A, Sharma S and Verma S:
Prostate biopsy: When and how to perform. Clin Radiol. 74:853–864.
2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed HU, Catto J,
Emberton M, Nam R, Rosario DJ, Scattoni V and Lotan Y: Systematic
review of complications of prostate biopsy. Eur Urol. 64:876–892.
2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
9
|
Skouteris VM, Crawford ED, Mouraviev V,
Arangua P, Metsinis MP, Skouteris M, Zacharopoulos G and Stone NN:
Transrectal ultrasound-guided versus transperineal mapping prostate
biopsy: Complication comparison. Rev Urol. 20:19–25.
2018.PubMed/NCBI View
Article : Google Scholar
|
|
10
|
Stefanova V, Buckley R, Flax S, Spevack L,
Hajek D, Tunis A, Lai E and Loblaw A: Collaborators. Transperineal
prostate biopsies using local anesthesia: Experience with 1,287
patients. Prostate cancer detection rate, complications and patient
tolerability. J Urol. 201:1121–1126. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
11
|
Rui S, Zejun Y and Yue C: The application
of anesthesia and analgesia in transrectal prostate biopsy. Chin
Med J. 40:76–78. 2019.(In Chinese).
|
|
12
|
Garcia-Perdomo HA, Mejia NG, Fernandez L
and Carbonell J: Effectiveness of periprostatic block to prevent
pain in transrectal prostate biopsy: A systematic review and a
network meta-analysis. Cent European J Urol. 72:121–133.
2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
Cho JM, Lee SW, Kang JY and Yoo TK: Safety
and efficacy of combined transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate
needle biopsy and transurethral resection of the prostate. Korean J
Urol. 51:101–105. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
14
|
Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PU, Cornud
F, Haider MA, Macura KJ, Margolis D, Schnall MD, Shtern F, Tempany
CM, et al: PI-RADS prostate imaging-reporting and data system:.
2015, version 2. Eur Urol. 69:16–40. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
15
|
Omer A and Lamb AD: Optimizing prostate
biopsy techniques. Curr Opin Urol. 29:578–586. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
Yang TY, Chow YC, Lin WR, Ko MC, Chen M,
Chang HK, Hsu JM, Yang S, Lin WC and Chiu AW: Concomitant
transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy and transurethral resection of
prostate in patients with urinary retention and elevated serum
prostate-specific antigen levels. J Chin Med Assoc. 79:605–608.
2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
17
|
Chen YT, Chiang PH and Hsu CC:
Simultaneous transurethral resection of prostate and prostate
needle biopsy in patients with acute urinary retention and elevated
prostate specific antigen levels. Chang Gung Med J. 32:417–422.
2009.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Tu X, Liu Z, Chang T, Qiu S, Xu H, Bao Y,
Yang L and Wei Q: Transperineal magnetic resonance imaging-targeted
biopsy may perform better than transrectal route in the detection
of clinically significant prostate cancer: Systematic review and
meta-analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 17:e860–e870.
2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
19
|
Pepe P, Fraggetta F, Galia A, Grasso G and
Aragona F: Prostate cancer detection by TURP after repeated
negative saturation biopsy in patients with persistent suspicion of
cancer: A case-control study on 75 consecutive patients. Prostate
Cancer Prostatic Dis. 13:83–86. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
20
|
Tavolaro S, Mozer P, Roupret M, Comperat
E, Rozet F, Barret E, Drouin S, Vaessen C, Lucidarme O, Cussenot O,
et al: Transition zone and anterior stromal prostate cancers:
Evaluation of discriminant location criteria using multiparametric
fusion-guided biopsy. Diagn Interv Imaging. 99:403–411.
2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
21
|
Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA,
Padhani AR, Villeirs G, Macura KJ, Tempany CM, Choyke PL, Cornud F,
Margolis DJ, et al: Prostate imaging reporting and data system
version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data
system version 2. Eur Urol. 76:340–351. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
22
|
Borkowetz A, Platzek I, Toma M, Renner T,
Herout R, Baunacke M, Laniado M, Baretton GB, Froehner M, Zastrow S
and Wirth MP: Evaluation of prostate imaging reporting and data
system classification in the prediction of tumor aggressiveness in
targeted magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy. Urol
Int. 99:177–185. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
23
|
Pepe P, Pennisi M and Fraggetta F: How
many cores should be obtained during saturation biopsy in the Era
of multiparametric magnetic resonance? Experience in 875 patients
submitted to repeat prostate biopsy. Urology. 137:133–137.
2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
24
|
Jaffe J, Stakhovsky O, Cathelineau X,
Barret E, Vallancien G and Rozet F: Surgical outcomes for men
undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after transurethral
resection of the prostate. J Urol. 178:483–487; discussion 487.
2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
25
|
Menard J, de la Taille A, Hoznek A, Allory
Y, Vordos D, Yiou R, Abbou CC and Salomon L: Laparoscopic radical
prostatectomy after transurethral resection of the prostate:
Surgical and functional outcomes. Urology. 72:593–597.
2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
26
|
Montorsi F, Wilson TG, Rosen RC, Ahlering
TE, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A, Eastham JA, Ficarra V,
Guazzoni G, et al: Best practices in robot-assisted radical
prostatectomy: Recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. Eur
Urol. 62:368–381. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
27
|
Shen BY, Chang PL, Lee SH, Chen CL and
Tsui KH: Complications following combined transrectal
ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsies and transurethral
resection of the prostate. Arch Androl. 52:123–127. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
