|
1
|
Kreel L: Medical Imaging. Postgrad Med J.
67:334–346. 1991.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
2
|
Elliott MJ and Slakey JB: CT provides
precise size assessment of implanted titanium alloy pedicle screws.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 472:1605–1609. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
Jungmann PM, Agten CA, Pfirrmann CW and
Sutter R: Advances in MRI around metal. J Magn Reson Imaging.
46:972–991. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
4
|
Smith MR, Artz NS, Wiens C, Hernando D and
Reeder SB: Characterizing the limits of MRI near metallic
prostheses. Magn Reson Med. 74:1564–1573. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
5
|
Cyteval C and Bourdon A: Imaging
orthopedic implant infections. Diagn Interv Imaging. 93:547–557.
2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Lu W, Pauly KB, Gold GE, Pauly JM and
Hargreaves BA: Slice encoding for metal artifact correction with
noise reduction. Magn Reson Med. 65:1352–1357. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
7
|
Butts K, Pauly JM and Gold GE: Reduction
of blurring in view angle tilting MRI. Magn Reson Med. 53:418–424.
2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
Viano AM, Gronemeyer SA, Haliloglu M and
Hoffer FA: Improved MR imaging for patients with metallic implants.
Magn Reson Imaging. 18:287–295. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
9
|
Bhoil A, Caw H and Vinjamuri S: Role of
18F-flurodeoxyglucose in orthopaedic implant-related infection:
Review of literature and experience. Nucl Med Commun. 40:875–887.
2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
10
|
Fujiwara Y, Sasaki T, Muto Y, Hirano M,
Kamizaki R, Murakami K, Miura N, Fujibuchi Y, Ohmukai N, Ueda N, et
al: Multiacquisition variable-resonance image combination selective
can improve image quality and reproducibility for metallic implants
in the lumbar spine. Acta Med Okayama. 75:187–197. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
11
|
Koch KM, Brau AC, Chen W, Gold GE,
Hargreaves BA, Koff M, McKinnon GC, Potter HG and King KF: Imaging
near metal with a MAVRIC SL-SEMAC hybrid. Magn Reson Med. 65:71–82.
2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
12
|
Hilson A: Bland-Altman plot. Radiology.
231(604): author reply 604-5. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
Chen CP and Lin YM: Bland-Altman plots and
receiver operating characteristic curves are preferred. Radiology.
257(896): author reply 896-7. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
14
|
Gutierrez LB, Do BH, Gold GE, Hargreaves
BA, Koch KM, Worters PW and Stevens KJ: MRI near metallic implants
using MAVRIC SL: Initial clinical experience at 3T. Acad Radiol.
22:370–379. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
15
|
Choi S, Koch MK, Hargreaves AB, Stevens JK
and Gold EG: Metal artifact reduction with MAVRIC SL at 3-T MRI in
patients with hip arthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 204:140–147.
2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
Hayter LC, Koff FM, Shah P, Koch MK,
Miller TT and Potter GH: MRI after arthroplasty: Comparison of
MAVRIC and conventional fast spin-echo techniques. AJR Am J
Roentgenol. 197:W405–W411. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
17
|
Liebl H, Heilmeier U, Lee S, Nardo L,
Patsch J, Schuppert C, Han M, Rondak IC, Banerjee S, Koch K, et al:
In vitro assessment of knee MRI in the presence of metal implants
comparing MAVRIC-SL and conventional fast spin echo sequences at
1.5 and 3 T field strength. J Magn Reson Imaging. 41:1291–1299.
2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
18
|
Kretzschmar M, Nardo L, Han MM, Heilmeier
U, Sam C, Joseph GB, Koch KM, Krug R and Link TM: Metal artifact
suppression at 3 T MRI: Comparison of MAVRIC SL with conventional
fast spin echo sequences in patients with hip joint arthroplasty.
Eur Radiol. 25:2403–2411. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
19
|
Ai T, Padua A, Goerner F, Nittka M, Gugala
Z, Jadhav S, Trelles M, Johnson RF, Lindsey RW, Li X and Runge VM:
SEMAC-VAT and MSVAT-SPACE sequence strategies for metal artifact
reduction in 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol.
47:267–276. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
20
|
Ariyanayagam T, Malcolm PN and Toms AP:
Advances in metal artifact reduction techniques for periprosthetic
soft tissue imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 19:328–334.
2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
21
|
Albakheet SS, Lee HY, Hahn S, Song TH, Suh
SJ and Kaushik S: Accelerated metallic artifact reduction imaging
using spectral bin modulation of multiacquisition
variable-resonance image combination selective imaging. Magn Reson
Imaging. 72:19–24. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
22
|
Doyle Z, Yoon D, Lee KP, Rosenberg J,
Hargreaves AB, Beaulieu FC and Stevens JK: Clinical utility of
accelerated MAVRIC-SL with robust-PCA compared to conventional
MAVRIC-SL in evaluation of total hip arthroplasties. Skeletal
Radiol. 51:549–556. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
23
|
Yang R, Liu C, Li L, Chen L, Liu WV and
Zha Y: 3-T MRI in patients who received anterior cervical
discectomy and fusion surgery with MAVRIC SL IR sequence: A
feasibility study. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 25:1024–1030.
2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
24
|
Park M, Moon Y, Han SH, Kim HK and Moon
WJ: Myelin loss in white matter hyperintensities and
normal-appearing white matter of cognitively impaired patients: A
quantitative synthetic magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur
Radiol. 29:4914–4921. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
25
|
Togashi K, Nishimura K, Itoh K, Fujisawa
I, Sago T, Minami S, Nakano Y, Itoh H, Torizuka K and Ozasa H:
Ovarian cystic teratomas: MR imaging. Radiology. 162:669–673.
1987.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
26
|
Lee SM, Choi YH, Cheon JE, Kim IO, Cho SH,
Kim WH, Kim HJ, Cho HH, You SK, Park SH and Hwang MJ: Image quality
at synthetic brain magnetic resonance imaging in children. Pediatr
Radiol. 47:1638–1647. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
