|
1
|
Angolile CM, Max BL, Mushemba J and
Mashauri HL: Global increased cesarean section rates and public
health implications: A call to action. Health Sci Rep.
6(e1274)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
2
|
Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer
BM and Saade GR: Preventing the first cesarean delivery: Summary of
a joint eunice kennedy shriver national institute of child health
and human development, society for maternal-fetal medicine, and
American college of obstetricians and gynecologists workshop.
Obstet Gynecol. 120:1181–1193. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
Li HT, Luo S, Trasande L, Hellerstein S,
Kang C, Li JX, Zhang Y, Liu JM and Blustein J: Geographic
variations and temporal trends in cesarean delivery rates in China,
2008-2014. JAMA. 317:69–76. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
4
|
Rajaa S, Sujiv A and Kar SS: Risk factors
for cesarean section in women of urban Puducherry, India: A matched
case-control study. Int J Popul Stud. 7:66–72. 2022.
|
|
5
|
Clark EAS and Silver RM: Long-term
maternal morbidity associated with repeat cesarean delivery. Am J
Obstet Gynecol. 205 (Suppl):S2–S10. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, Sun YL, Lin YH
and Tseng CJ: Cesarean scar defect: Correlation between cesarean
section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine
position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 34:85–89. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View
Article : Google Scholar
|
|
7
|
Diaz SD, Jones JE, Seryakov M and Mann WJ:
Uterine rupture and dehiscence: Ten-year review and case-control
study. South Med J. 95:431–435. 2002.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Kjerulff KH, Zhu J, Weisman CS and Ananth
CV: First birth caesarean section and subsequent fertility: A
population-based study in the USA, 2000-2008. Hum Reprod.
28:3349–3357. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
9
|
Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Mahmood TA,
van der Meulen JH and Templeton A: A population-based cohort study
of the effect of caesarean section on subsequent fertility. Hum
Reprod. 29:1320–1326. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
10
|
Murphy DJ, Stirrat GM and Heron J: ALSPAC
Study Team. The relationship between caesarean section and
subfertility in a population-based sample of 14 541 pregnancies.
Hum Reprod. 17:1914–1917. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
11
|
Tollånes MC, Melve KK, Irgens LM and
Skjaerven R: Reduced fertility after cesarean delivery: A maternal
choice. Obstet Gynecol. 110:1256–1263. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
12
|
Zhao J, Hao J, Xu B, Wang Y and Li Y:
Impact of previous caesarean section on reproductive outcomes after
assisted reproductive technology: Systematic review and
meta-analyses. Reprod Biomed Online. 43:197–204. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron
I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan
SE, et al: The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for
reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 372(n71)2021.PubMed/NCBI View
Article : Google Scholar
|
|
14
|
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M and
Minder C: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical
test. BMJ. 315:629–634. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
15
|
Lo CK, Mertz D and Loeb M:
Newcastle-ottawa scale: Comparing reviewers' to authors'
assessments. BMC Med Res Methodol. 14(45)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
Huang J, Lin J, Cai R, Lu X, Song N, Gao
H, Zhu J and Kuang Y: Effect of a prior cesarean delivery on
pregnancy outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer: A
retrospective cohort study in a freeze-all setting. Acta Obstet
Gynecol Scand. 99:1303–1310. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
17
|
Patounakis G, Ozcan MC, Chason RJ, Norian
JM, Payson M, DeCherney AH and Yauger BJ: Impact of a prior
cesarean delivery on embryo transfer: A prospective study. Fertil
Steril. 106:311–316. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
18
|
van den Tweel MM, Klijn NF, Diaz de Pool
JDN, van der Westerlaken LAJ and Louwe LA: Previous caesarean
section is associated with lower subsequent in vitro fertilization
live birth rates. Hum Fertil (Camb). 25:93–98. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
19
|
Wang YQ, Yin TL, Xu WM, Qi QR, Wang XC and
Yang J: Reproductive outcomes in women with prior cesarean section
undergoing in vitro fertilization: A retrospective case-control
study. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 37:922–927.
2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
20
|
Zhang N, Chen H, Xu Z, Wang B, Sun H and
Hu Y: Pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes of in vitro
fertilization-embryo transfer in patient with previous cesarean
scar. Med Sci Monit. 22:3288–3295. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
21
|
Lawrenz B, Melado L, Garrido N, Coughlan
C, Markova D and Fatemi H: Isthmocele and ovarian stimulation for
IVF: Considerations for a reproductive medicine specialist. Hum
Reprod. 35:89–99. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
22
|
Wang L, Yao W, Tang X, Yao H, Wei S, Huang
J, Mol BWJ, Jin L, Yue J and Wang R: Fertility outcomes of IVF/ICSI
after caesarean section: A cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online.
40:719–728. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
23
|
Asoglu MR, Celik C, Ozturk E, Cavkaytar S
and Bahceci M: Impact of isthmocele on assisted reproductive
treatment outcomes: An age-matched retrospective study. J Minim
Invasive Gynecol. 28:1113–1120. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
24
|
Vissers J, Sluckin TC, van Driel-Delprat
CCR, Schats R, Groot CJM, Lambalk CB, Twisk JWR and Huirne JAF:
Reduced pregnancy and live birth rates after in vitro fertilization
in women with previous caesarean section: A retrospective cohort
study. Hum Reprod. 35:595–604. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
25
|
Chen T, Li B, Shi H, Bu ZQ, Zhang FQ and
Su YC: Reproductive outcomes of single embryo transfer in women
with previous cesarean section. Reprod Sci. 28:1049–1059.
2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
26
|
Gale J, Corran B, Bacal V, Haebe J, Nguyen
V and Shmorgun D: Reduced live birth rates after embryo transfer in
patients with prior cesarean delivery: A retrospective cohort
study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 271:250–254.
2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
27
|
Cai M, Pan X, Xia W, Liang X and Yang X:
Intra-cavitary fluid resulted from caesarean section but not
isthmocele compromised clinical pregnancy after IVF/ICSI treatment.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 306:229–237. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
28
|
Zhang Y, de Ziegler D, Hu X, Tai X, Han Y,
Ma J, Zhang Y and Luo H: Previous caesarean delivery and the
presence of caesarean scar defects could affect pregnancy outcomes
after in vitro fertilization frozen-thawed embryo transfer: A
retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth.
22(769)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
29
|
Wang L, Wang J, Lu N, Liu J and Diao F:
Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of patients with prior cesarean
section after a single embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI: A retrospective
cohort study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne).
13(851213)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
30
|
Bayram A, Elkhatib I, Abdala A, Nogueira
D, Melado L, Fatemi HM and Lawrenz B: ART outcome after euploid
frozen embryo transfer is not affected by previous cesarean section
delivery in the absence of intracavitary fluid. J Assist Reprod
Genet. 39:2529–2537. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
31
|
Diao J, Gao G, Zhang Y, Wang X, Zhang Y,
Han Y, Du A and Luo H: Caesarean section defects may affect
pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: A
retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth.
21(487)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
32
|
Jacob L, Weber K, Sechet I, Macharey G,
Kostev K and Ziller V: Caesarean section and its impact on
fertility and time to a subsequent pregnancy in Germany: A database
analysis in gynecological practices. Arch Gynecol Obstet.
294:1005–1010. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
33
|
Friedenthal J, Alkon-Meadows T,
Hernandez-Nieto C, Gounko D, Lee JA, Copperman A and Buyuk E: The
association between prior cesarean delivery and subsequent in vitro
fertilization outcomes in women undergoing autologous,
frozen-thawed single euploid embryo transfer. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
225:287.e1–287.e8. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
34
|
Lin Y, Chen Q, Huang X, Wang Z, Chen C,
Chen H and Jin F: Obstetric and perinatal outcomes after assisted
reproductive technology in women with cesarean scar. Front Physiol.
13(808079)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
35
|
Rietveld AL, van Exel NJA, Cohen de Lara
MC, de Groot CJM and Teunissen PW: Giving birth after caesarean:
Identifying shared preferences among pregnant women using Q
methodology. Women Birth. 33:273–279. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
36
|
Hemminki E: Impact of caesarean section on
future pregnancy-a review of cohort studies. Paediatr Perinat
Epidemiol. 10:366–379. 1996.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
37
|
O'Neill SM, Kearney PM, Kenny LC,
Henriksen TB, Lutomski JE, Greene RA and Khashan AS: Caesarean
delivery and subsequent pregnancy interval: A systematic review and
meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 13(165)2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
38
|
Rosa F, Perugin G, Schettini D, Romano N,
Romeo S, Podestà R, Guastavino A, Casaleggio A and Gandolfo N:
Imaging findings of cesarean delivery complications: Cesarean scar
disease and much more. Insights Imaging. 10(98)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
39
|
Ananias P, Luenam K, Melo JP, Jose AM,
Yaqub S, Turkistani A, Shah A and Mohammed L: Cesarean section: A
potential and forgotten risk for abdominal wall endometriosis.
Cureus. 13(e17410)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
40
|
Tinari S, Buca D, Cali G, Timor-Tritsch I,
Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Rizzo G, Lucidi A, Di Mascio D, Liberati M
and D'Antonio F: Risk factors, histopathology and diagnostic
accuracy in posterior placenta accreta spectrum disorders:
Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
57:903–909. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
41
|
Ben-Nagi J, Walker A, Jurkovic D, Yazbek J
and Aplin JD: Effect of cesarean delivery on the endometrium. Int J
Gynaecol Obstet. 106:30–34. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
42
|
Naji O, Daemen A, Smith A, Abdallah Y,
Bradburn E, Giggens R, Chan DC, Stalder C, Ghaem-Maghami S,
Timmerman D and Bourne T: Does the presence of a cesarean section
scar influence the site of placental implantation and subsequent
migration in future pregnancies: A prospective case-control study.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 40:557–561. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
43
|
Riemma G, De Franciscis P, Torella M,
Narciso G, La Verde M, Morlando M, Cobellis L and Colacurci N:
Reproductive and pregnancy outcomes following embryo transfer in
women with previous cesarean section: A systematic review and
meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 100:1949–1960.
2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
44
|
Tanimura S, Funamoto H, Hosono T, Shitano
Y, Nakashima M, Ametani Y and Nakano T: New diagnostic criteria and
operative strategy for cesarean scar syndrome: Endoscopic repair
for secondary infertility caused by cesarean scar defect. J Obstet
Gynaecol Res. 41:1363–1369. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
45
|
Tower AM and Frishman GN: Cesarean scar
defects: An underrecognized cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and
other gynecologic complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol.
20:562–572. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
