|
1
|
Zhang T, Guo N, Gao G, Liu H, Li Y, Gao F,
Zhang Q, Tao X, Yang W and Wang Y: Comparison of outcomes between
Zero-p implant and anterior cervical plate interbody fusion systems
for anterior cervical decompression and fusion: A systematic review
and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg
Res. 17(47)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
2
|
Schmitz P, Cornelius Neumann C, Neumann C,
Nerlich M and Dendorfer S: Biomechanical analysis of iliac crest
loading following cortico-cancellous bone harvesting. J Orthop Surg
Res. 13(108)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
3
|
Walsh WR, Pelletier MH, Christou C, He J,
Vizesi F and Boden SD: The in vivo response to a novel Ti coating
compared with polyether ether ketone: Evaluation of the periphery
and inner surfaces of an implant. Spine J. 18:1231–1240.
2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
4
|
Xu J, He Y, Li Y, Lv GH, Dai YL, Jiang B,
Zheng Z and Wang B: Incidence of subsidence of seven intervertebral
devices in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A network
meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 141:479–489.e4. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
5
|
Choy WJ, Parr WCH, Phan K, Walsh WR and
Mobbs RJ: 3-dimensional printing for anterior cervical surgery: A
review. J Spine Surg. 4:757–769. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
6
|
Broekhuis D, Boyle R, Karunaratne S, Chua
A and Stalley P: Custom designed and 3D-printed titanium pelvic
implants for acetabular reconstruction after tumour resection. Hip
Int. 33:905–915. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
7
|
Fang T, Zhang M, Yan J, Zhao J, Pan W,
Wang X and Zhou Q: Comparative analysis of 3D-printed artificial
vertebral body versus titanium mesh cage in repairing bone defects
following single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion. Med
Sci Monit. 27(e928022)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
Hao L, Zhang Y, Bian W, Song W, Li K, Wang
N, Wen P and Ma T: Standardized 3D-printed trabecular titanium
augment and cup for acetabular bone defects in revision hip
arthroplasty: A mid-term follow-up study. J Orthop Surg Res.
18(521)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
9
|
Shen J, Yang M, Zhong N, Jiao J and Xiao
J: 3D-printed titanium prosthetic reconstruction of unilateral bone
deficiency after surgical resection of tumor lesions in the upper
cervical spine: Clinical outcomes of three consecutive cases and
narrative review. Clin Spine Surg. 36:256–264. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
10
|
Arts M, Torensma B and Wolfs J: Porous
titanium cervical interbody fusion device in the treatment of
degenerative cervical radiculopathy; 1-year results of a
prospective controlled trial. Spine J. 20:1065–1072.
2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
11
|
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J and Altman
DG: PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews
and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol.
62:1006–1012. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
12
|
Furlan JC and Catharine Craven B:
Psychometric analysis and critical appraisal of the original,
revised, and modified versions of the Japanese Orthopaedic
Association score in the assessment of patients with cervical
spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurg Focus. 40(E6)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
McCormack HM, Horne DJ and Sheather S:
Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: A critical review.
Psychol Med. 18:1007–1019. 1988.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
14
|
Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni
P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA, et
al: The cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in
randomised trials. BMJ. 343(d5928)2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
15
|
Stang A: Critical evaluation of the
newcastle-ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of
nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol.
25:603–605. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
16
|
Bai C, Zhang Y, Guo J, Liu Q, Li Z and
Song Y: Early clinical study on anterior cervical fusion surgery
with 3D printed interbody fusion cage for treatment of cervical
disk herniation. J Nat Sci. 24:236–239. 2023.
|
|
17
|
Jiang C, Jiang S, Tang Y and Jiang L:
Efficacy of 3D printed microporous titanium fusion device applied
to anterior cervical decompression graft fusion and its effects on
cervical spine anatomy and stress hormones. Chin J Tissue Eng Res.
27:2837–2841. 2023.
|
|
18
|
Li L: Clinical study of 3D printing spine
intervertebral fusion cage in treatment of cervical spondylosis.
Chengde Medical University, 2020.
|
|
19
|
Li Y, Wang H and Cui W: Comparison of the
efficacy of ACDF in the treatment of cervical spondylotic
myelopathy using 3D printed intervertebral fusion cage and
Polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) intervertebral fusion cage. Chin J
Spine and Spinal Cord. 31:16–24. 2021.(In Chinese).
|
|
20
|
Liu Z, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Ming Y, Sun Z and
Sun H: Application of 3D printed interbody fusion cage for cervical
spondylosis of spinal cord type: Half-year follow-up of recovery of
cervical curvature and intervertebral height. Chin J Tissue Eng
Res. 25:849–853. 2021.(In Chinese).
|
|
21
|
Wang Z, Feng H, Ma X, Chen C, Deng C and
Sun L: Effectiveness of three-dimensional printing artificial
vertebral body and interbody fusion Cage in anterior cervical
surgery. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 35:1147–1154.
2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In Chinese).
|
|
22
|
Wang J, Wu D, Sun H, Zhang Y, Xin L and Li
L: Follow-up of the clinical efficacy and sagittal balance of 3D
printing spine intervertebral fusion cage in treatment of cervical
spondylosis. Chin J Clin Anat. 41:342–348. 2023.(In Chinese).
|
|
23
|
Wang Y, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Hao Y and Zhang B:
Application of 3D print porous titanium alloy intervertebral fusion
cage in anterior cervical discectomy and bone graft fusion for
treatment of cervical spondylopathy. Chin J Bone and Joint Inj.
38:1–5. 2023.(In Chinese).
|
|
24
|
Yang X, Zhao X, Qi D, et al: Changes in
cervical sagittal balance after three-dimensional printing ACT
titanium cage in anterior cervical discectomy with fusion. Chin J
Tissue Eng Res. 24:5741–5748. 2020.(In Chinese).
|
|
25
|
Zhang Y, Liu Z, Fang Z, Wu W and Li F:
Clinical efficacy of 3D-printed titanium cage in the treatment of
cervical spondylotic myelopathy and changes in cervical sagittal
parameter. Orthopaedics. 12:97–102. 2021.
|
|
26
|
Bridges KJ, Simpson LN, Bullis CL, Rekito
A, Sayama CM and Than KD: Combined laminoplasty and posterior
fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy treatment: A literature
review. Asian Spine J. 12:446–458. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
27
|
Berger MB, Slosar P, Schwartz Z, Cohen DJ,
Goodman SB, Anderson PA and Boyan BD: A review of biomimetic
topographies and their role in promoting bone formation and
osseointegration: Implications for clinical use. Biomimetics
(Basel). 7(46)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
28
|
Zhu Y, Cao Z, Peng Y, Hu L, Guney T and
Tang B: Facile surface modification method for synergistically
enhancing the biocompatibility and bioactivity of poly(ether ether
ketone) that induced osteodifferentiation. ACS Appl Mater
Interfaces. 11:27503–27511. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
29
|
Yamamoto N, Hayashi K and Tsuchiya H:
Progress in biological reconstruction and enhanced bone
revitalization for bone defects. J Orthop Sci. 24:387–392.
2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
30
|
Kaur M and Singh K: Review on titanium and
titanium based alloys as biomaterials for orthopaedic applications.
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 102:844–862. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
31
|
Tamayo JA, Riascos M, Vargas CA and Baena
LM: Additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4V alloy via electron beam
melting for the development of implants for the biomedical
industry. Heliyon. 7(e06892)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
32
|
Zhang F, Xu H, Wang H, Geng F, Ma X, Shao
M, Xu S, Lu F and Jiang J: Quantitative analysis of near-implant
magnesium accumulation for a Si-containing coated AZ31 cage from a
goat cervical spine fusion model. BMC Musculoskelet Disord.
19(105)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
33
|
Li SL, Zhao JS and Yang LX: Numerical
simulation analysis of mechanical properties of irregular porous
titanium lumbar fusion apparatus mechanical science and technology
for aerospace engineering: 1-7, 2023.
|
|
34
|
Fogel G, Martin N, Lynch K, Pelletier MH,
Wills D, Wang T, Walsh WR, Williams GM, Malik J, Peng Y and Jekir
M: Subsidence and fusion performance of a 3D-printed porous
interbody cage with stress-optimized body lattice and microporous
endplates-a comprehensive mechanical and biological analysis. Spine
J. 22:1028–1037. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
35
|
Jin YZ, Zhao B, Lu XD, Zhao YB, Zhao XF,
Wang XN, Zhou RT, Qi DT and Wang WX: Mid- and long-term follow-up
efficacy analysis of 3D-printed interbody fusion cages for anterior
cervical discectomy and fusion. Orthop Surg. 13:1969–1978.
2021.PubMed/NCBI View
Article : Google Scholar
|
|
36
|
Li X, Wu S, Li Y, Zhang Y and Guo Z:
3D-printed porous titanium cage versus polyetheretherketone cage in
sheep vertebral fusion. Chin J Orthop Trauma. 17:34–39. 2015.(In
Chinese).
|
|
37
|
Wu SH, Li Y, Zhang YQ, Li XK, Yuan CF, Hao
YL, Zhang ZY and Guo Z: Porous titanium-6 aluminum-4 vanadium cage
has better osseointegration and less micromotion than a
poly-ether-ether-ketone cage in sheep vertebral fusion. Artif
Organs. 37:E191–E201. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
38
|
Obermueller T, Wagner A, Kogler L, Joerger
AK, Lange N, Lehmberg J, Meyer B and Shiban E: Radiographic
measurements of cervical alignment, fusion and subsidence after
ACDF surgery and their impact on clinical outcome. Acta Neurochir
(Wien). 162:89–99. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
39
|
Shah FA, Snis A, Matic A, Thomsen P and
Palmquist A: 3D printed Ti6Al4V implant surface promotes bone
maturation and retains a higher density of less aged osteocytes at
the bone-implant interface. Acta Biomater. 30:357–367.
2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
40
|
Luan H, Peng C, Liu K and Song X:
Comparing the efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic
transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive
transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar degenerative
diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res.
18(888)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
41
|
Toci GR, Lambrechts MJ, Karamian BA,
Canseco JA, Hilibrand AS, Kepler CK, Vaccaro AR and Schroeder GD:
Patients with radiculopathy have worse baseline disability and
greater improvements following anterior cervical discectomy and
fusion compared to patients with myelopathy. Spine J. 23:238–246.
2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
