International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.
International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.
Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.
Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.
Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.
Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.
International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.
Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.
Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.
Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.
An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common and aggressive form of pancreatic cancer, accounting for 85% of all PDAC cases and representing the seventh leading cause of cancer globally (1,2). While PDAC predominantly arises from the ductal epithelium of the pancreas, accumulating evidence indicates that acinar cells can also undergo acinar-to-ductal metaplasia and subsequently give rise to PDAC. It is characterized by rapid progression and resistance to therapy, with a 5-year survival rate of ~10% (3). PDAC is frequently diagnosed too late due to heterogeneity in clinical presentation with high metastatic potential, making PDAC the third most common cause of cancer-associated mortality in the USA (4,5).
PDAC is associated with poor prognosis due to a lack of diagnostic biomarkers, a fibrotic tumor microenvironment, desmoplasia, and resistance to chemotherapy and immunotherapy (3,6). Additionally, variability in CA19-9, including absent expression levels in a subset of patients, elevation in benign conditions and inconsistent secretion by tumors, reduces its reliability as a prognostic marker. These limitations hinder early detection and accurate disease monitoring, thereby contributing to delayed diagnosis and ultimately poor prognosis, which restricts its clinical utility for screening asymptomatic patients (7,8). PDAC management poses notable challenges due to a stroma rich in hyaluronan, adhesion molecules, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and MMPs, which promote disease progression and drug resistance (9).
A previous study has highlighted the role of cell adhesion molecules, including CEA-related cell adhesion molecules (CEACAMs), in cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions whilst regulating tumor survival, invasion, metastasis, drug resistance and progression of PDAC (10). CEACAMs and integrins can modulate tumor progression through epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), immune evasion and anoikis resistance (11). Understanding the mechanisms and function of adhesion molecules in the fibrotic and immunosuppressive microenvironment of PDAC is essential for the development of novel therapeutic targets in PDAC management. The present review provides an updated and PDAC-specific summary, highlighting recent mechanistic insights and therapeutic perspectives.
Adhesion molecules, which are frequently upregulated in cancer, enable tumor cell adhesion, invasion and migration by activating signals that regulate differentiation, the cell cycle and survival (12,13). These features render adhesion molecules potential focal nodes for diagnosis and therapeutic intervention.
Adhesion molecules typically exhibit unique characteristics. Unlike numerous adhesion molecules that signal through direct intracellular interactions through transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains, CEACAM6, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored glycoprotein of the immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily, lacks both a transmembrane and cytoplasmic domain (14-16). This enables CEACAM6 to mediate cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion through lateral associations with lipid rafts and co-receptors, promoting PDAC progression (17). Additionally, it can facilitate tumor cell invasion, motility and signal transduction, thereby contributing to tumor growth and metastasis processes in solid malignancies, including colorectal, breast and gastric cancer (16-20).
CEACAM6 expression varies across different stages of tumorigenesis, and is modulated by components of the tumor microenvironment, including collagen, laminin and fibrin (14,16). However, the dynamic and transient membrane association of CEACAM6, particularly its localization within lipid rafts and its status as a GPI-anchored protein lacking an intrinsic signaling domain, hampers precise delineation of its downstream signaling mechanisms (21). CEACAM6 is a key target in PDAC due to its upregulation in the disease, promoting resistance to anoikis, invasion, metastasis and therapy resistance, and it is readily accessible as a GPI-anchored cell surface protein, making it an attractive therapeutic target (17,22). Nevertheless, it is also essential to understand the roles of integrins and other adhesion molecules in the management of PDAC (17-22).
Integrins serve a crucial role in cell communication, tissue regulation and maintenance (23). In addition, integrins facilitate tumor progression by mediating interactions between extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins and cytoplasmic components, potentially influencing the tumor microenvironment (13,16). Therefore, understanding the role of integrins in PDAC is crucial for developing targeted therapies, managing cancer spread, and optimizing patient outcomes (Fig. 1).
The present review aims to critically analyze the oncogenic role of CEACAM6 in PDAC and the mechanisms by which integrins influs to synthesize evidence on the association between CEACAMs and integrins in PDAC, focusing on their co-expression, cross-talk in signaling pathways and combined impact on tumor progression, invasion and therapy resistance. The review further discusses how this interplay highlights the potential for developing targeted therapeutic strategies against these adhesion molecules (Fig. 1).
Ig cell adhesion molecules (IgCAMs), including calcium-independent glycoproteins, such as CEA, constitute a large family of cell surface glycoproteins specializing in cell-cell adhesion (24). CEA, along with other associated IgCAMs or proteins, are involved in homotypic and heterotypic interactions, constituting essential diagnostic markers for various solid tumors, such as colorectal cancer (25).
The human CEA family consists of 29 genes, 12 of which are classified within the CEACAM subgroup (CEACAM1, CEACAM3, CEACAM4, CEACAM5, CEACAM6, CEACAM7, CEACAM8, CEACAM16, CEACAM18, CEACAM19, CEACAM20 and CEACAM21), which cluster on the long arm of chromosome 19(26). Amongst these, CEACAM1, CEACAM3, CEACAM4, CEACAM6, CEACAM7 and CEACAM8 differ in their Ig-like domain composition, glycosylation patterns, membrane anchoring mechanisms and tissue distribution (Fig. 2) (27,28). Structurally, CEACAMs share an N-terminal Ig variable (IgV)-like domain followed by constant-like domains (A and B), with extensive glycosylation accounting for ≤50% of the molecular mass of the protein (29).
In addition, these proteins are bound to the cell membrane by either a GPI moiety (CEACAM5, CEACAM6, CEACAM7, CEACAM8, CEACAM16 and CEACAM18) or a proteinaceous transmembrane region (CEACAM1, CEACAM3, CEACAM4, CEACAM19, CEACAM20 and CEACAM21) (Fig. 2) (25,30,31). This structural diversity influences the functional roles of the CEACAM subtypes in adhesion, migration and immune modulation in cancer. However, limited expression of certain CEACAMs in animals limits their mechanistic investigations (24,32,33). For example, CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 are highly expressed in humans but absent in mice, while CEACAM7 and CEACAM8 also lack murine orthologs, thereby limiting their in vivo study potential (24,32,33).
CEACAM1 has a cytoplasmic tail that harbors immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motifs (ITIMs), which are critical for intracellular signaling (34), and has a molecular weight of ~90 kDa (35). Another feature of CEACAM1 is the IgV domain that facilitates homophilic and heterophilic adhesion through complementarity-determining regions (CDR)-like loops, whilst ITIM phosphorylation recruits Src homology region 2 domain-containing phosphatase (SHP)-1 (also known as PTPN6) and SHP-2 (also known as PTPN11), thereby inhibiting T-cell signaling and supporting immune evasion (34,36). Previous studies have shown that CEACAM1 is involved in bidirectional signaling, modulating immune checkpoint regulation and tumor progression (28,37). However, it remains under investigation as a prognostic marker target in PDAC, melanoma, colorectal cancer and non-small cell lung cancer, and as an emerging immunotherapeutic target across multiple malignancies (28,37). However, its clinical relevance in PDAC specifically remains under investigation (38,39).
CEACAM5, has one IgV domain and six IgC2 domains (arranged as A1-B1-A2-B2-A3-B3) and a GPI moiety anchored to the cell membrane (40,41). Furthermore, it has a molecular weight of 180-200 kDa with extensive N-linked glycosylation (18,42). CEACAM5 mediates cell-cell adhesion through its IgV domain and is likely involved in signaling cascades due to its lipid raft localization (16). By associating with transmembrane receptors, such as integrins (α5β1, αvβ3), CEACAM1 and EGFR, CEACAM5 can influence downstream signaling, thereby supporting metastatic spread and immune evasion (43,44). Therefore, CEACAM5 has been proposed to be a possible serum biomarker and target in PDAC immunotherapy in clinical settings (20,43,45).
CEACAM6 (also known as CD66c) comprises an N-terminal IgV domain and two IgC2 domains (A1-B1), forming a compact three-domain structure that is anchored to the membrane by a GPI anchor (29). With a molecular weight of 90-95 kDa, CEACAM6 is heavily glycosylated and frequently localizes to lipid rafts (28,46). CEACAM6 lacks a cytoplasmic domain but can facilitate signal transduction through interactions with various integrin co-receptors, such as α5β1 and αvβ3, to activate key pathways, including the focal adhesion kinase (FAK), Src and PI3K/Akt pathways (16,21,47). Studies have previously demonstrated that CEACAM6 can promote tumor cell survival, anoikis resistance and EMT, whilst also contributing to chemoresistance in pancreatic, colorectal and breast cancer (16,18-20,22,48). Through indirect interactions with ECM components, such as fibronectin and vitronectin, CEACAM6 can also serve a pivotal role in PDAC invasion and progression (48).
CEACAM7 consists of an N-terminal IgV domain and two IgC2 domains (A1-B1), with a GPI anchor facilitating membrane association (21), and has a molecular weight of 75-85 kDa (43). Whilst CEACAM7 is generally considered to be a tumor suppressor in normal epithelial tissues, it displays oncogenic properties in PDAC (25,49,50). CEACAM7 mediates both homophilic and heterophilic adhesion, including interactions with CEACAM6 and integrins, and is involved in lipid raft-associated signal transduction (49). In addition, CEACAM7 has been implicated in peritoneal metastasis, is enriched in cancer stem cell populations, and is a potential early diagnostic and prognostic marker in PDAC (50). However, the therapeutic relevance of CEACAM7 is currently under investigation, including its applications in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy (50).
Within the CEACAM family, the IgV domain is a highly conserved structural feature that provides adhesive functions through β-sandwich folds and a CDR-like loop structure (51). However the type of membrane anchoring varies, with CEACAM1 incorporating a transmembrane helix allowing direct intracellular signaling, whereas CEACAM5, CEACAM6 and CEACAM7 are GPI-anchored, facilitating dynamic lipid raft localization and co-receptor engagement (21,52). By contrast, glycosylation of CEACAM family members influences protein folding, stability and protease resistance, thereby contributing to the functional plasticity in tumorigenesis (29,53).
The IgV domain provides opportunities for antibody-mediated blockade, since ITIM motifs can be exploited for immune modulation, whereas GPI anchors may be targeted to disrupt membrane clustering (54). Furthermore, the unique structural attributes of each CEACAM molecule are associated with their distinct roles in PDAC pathobiology (17,29,53), offering a framework for biomarker development and personalized treatment strategies.
Members of the CEACAM family, particularly CEACAM1, CEACAM5, CEACAM6 and CEACAM7, have emerged as key markers of the pathogenesis of PDAC, influencing diagnosis, prognosis and therapy (14,53). CEACAM1 has a cytoplasmic tail containing ITIMs (55) and is frequently upregulated in PDAC, where it has been proposed as both a clinical biomarker and a therapeutic target (38-58). CEACAM1 modulates immune responses through co-inhibitory functions, particularly by inhibiting T-cell receptor signaling through SHP-1/2 recruitment, making CEACAM1 a promising target in immunotherapy (28). However, previous studies have reported conflicting findings, with CEACAM1 being expressed at lower levels in the tumors of patients with PDAC compared with in normal pancreatic tissues (59,60). Furthermore, the roles of CEACAM1 in tumorigenesis and cancer progression have been inconclusively reported, highlighting the need for further mechanistic studies (61). CEACAM1 is upregulated in PDAC tissues and patient serum, and its increased levels are associated with tumor stage and progression, supporting its potential as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker (58). In addition, it has been evaluated as a non-invasive serum marker (58), with elevated CEACAM1 first reported in the serum of patients with PDAC. Simeone et al (57) further demonstrated that combining CEACAM1 with CA19-9 significantly improved sensitivity and specificity for early-stage PDAC detection. Furthermore, tissue-based assays revealed that CEACAM1 expression can distinguish PDAC from chronic pancreatitis and normal pancreatic tissue, supporting its role as both a serum and tissue biomarker (57,62). By contrast, high-CEACAM1 expression is associated with tumor grade, metastatic potential and patient survival, with functional divergence between isoforms. Specifically, isoform CEACAM1-L generally suppresses tumor progression through ITIM-mediated signaling, whereas isoform CEACAM1-S, lacking ITIM, is often upregulated and linked to oncogenic behavior (39,62).
Through ITIM-mediated recruitment of SHP-1 and SHP-2 phosphatases, CEACAM1 can downregulate T-cell receptor signaling, thereby facilitating tumor immune escape (63). In addition, CEACAM1 promotes can tumor angiogenesis through VEGFR2 pathway activation, thereby offering opportunities for anti-angiogenic combination therapies with synergistic potential (59,64).
Monoclonal antibodies neutralizing the inhibitory effects of CEACAM1 have been assessed, whereas bispecific antibodies that can target CEACAM1 alongside other checkpoints, such as TIM3, and small-molecule inhibitors of its downstream signaling components, including SHP2 inhibitors, Src/FAK inhibitors and PI3K/Akt or MAPK pathway inhibitors, are actively under investigation (54,65). Emerging strategies utilizing CEACAM1-directed CAR-T cell therapies that exploit its tumor-specific expression profile to achieve targeted cytotoxicity have also been explored (66,67). Combinatorial approaches, pairing CEACAM1 inhibition with chemotherapy, radiotherapy or co-targeting of integrins, may further enhance therapeutic efficacy by disrupting survival pathways and modifying the tumor microenvironment (54).
Methodological variability, including differences in detection techniques, antibody specificity and scoring criteria, result in heterogeneity in findings on CEACAM1 expression in PDAC (68). Additionally, intratumoral heterogeneity further adds to the complexity, with spatially distinct expression patterns across tumor subclones and stromal niches (53). The tumor microenvironment, including immune cell infiltration, stromal composition and hypoxia, can further influence CEACAM1 expression and function, underscoring the need for context-specific evaluation (69,70).
The multifaceted role of CEACAM1 in PDAC supports its integration into current precision medicine strategies. Understanding of its involvement in immune regulation, angiogenesis and cell adhesion should inform the development of targeted therapies and enable the predictive modeling of treatment outcomes. Therefore, future research should aim to standardize CEACAM1 detection methods, validate its utility in large patient cohorts and elucidate isoform-specific mechanisms of action (70).
Similarly, CEACAM5 is involved in cell adhesion, intracellular signaling, tumor progression and metastasis (71-73). CEACAM5 can mediate function through homophilic (with itself on neighboring cells) and through heterophilic interactions with other CEACAM family members, such as CEACAM6 and CEACAM1(53). CEACAM5 expression is frequently upregulated in malignancies, including PDAC, where it is localized to tumor cells and fibrotic or necrotic regions (71-75). Associations have been reported between CEACAM5 and immune checkpoint regulation and cancer stemness in PDAC, emphasizing its potential role as a biomarker and therapeutic target (59).
CEACAM7 has been identified as a potential early diagnostic and prognostic marker in PDAC (49). Although considered a tumor suppressor due to its downregulation in several epithelial cancer types, such as colorectal carcinoma, CEACAM7 expression is frequently upregulated in PDAC, especially during early tumorigenesis and in cancer stem cell-enriched populations (20,75). CEACAM7 has also been implicated in peritoneal metastasis through interactions with CEACAM6 and integrin subunit αV (75). Its dual expression profile and targeting in CAR-T cell study highlight its complex but important therapeutic potential (50).
CEACAM6/CD66c is a GPI-anchored glycoprotein with a variable IgV-like domain and two constant domains (A and B), through which CEACAM6 can form both homo- and heterodimers. Initially identified in hematological malignancies, CEACAM6 was later identified as a biomarker for colorectal cancer (17,19,31). CEACAM6 is expressed on epithelial and leukocyte surfaces (30).
In conclusion, CEACAMs exhibit diverse structural features and biological functions that can each influence PDAC development and progression in distinct manners. Their differential expression patterns and interactions with the tumor microenvironment offer potential for advancing early detection strategies and developing targeted therapies.
CEACAM6 expression is upregulated in PDAC, with a previous study showing a 20- to 25-fold increase in adenocarcinoma cells compared with normal pancreatic ductal epithelial cells (17). Upregulation typically begins early in pancreatic tumorigenesis, including in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia lesions (1,17), where it is associated with metastasis and poor prognosis (14,16). CEACAM6 has been identified to be a prognostic biomarker independent of KRAS mutation status, and is associated with aggressive PDAC subtypes (14,76).
In addition, CEACAM6 can promote cell migration, invasion and proliferation by upregulating MMPs and cyclin D1/CDK4 (53,77). CEACAM6 can facilitate EMT by promoting loss of epithelial traits and acquisition of mesenchymal characteristics, which is reflected in its inverse correlation with E-cadherin expression and its association with increased expression of mesenchymal markers such as vimentin (73). Mechanistically, miR29 a/b/c directly targets CEACAM6 mRNA, and their downregulation leads to CEACAM6 overexpression, thereby enhancing EMT and invasion (73,74). In addition, CEACAM6 is associated with anoikis (an apoptotic response triggered by detachment from the ECM) resistance primarily through enhanced Akt phosphorylation, which promotes cell survival (47,78). Supporting this, CEACAM6 inhibition has been reported to increase cell susceptibility to caspase-mediated anoikis by reducing Akt phosphorylation (47).
CEACAM6 can support tumor angiogenesis by activating FAK and paxillin signaling, promoting vasculogenic mimicry (79). Anti-CEACAM6 antibodies have been found to reduce MMP9 activity, invasion and angiogenesis (32). Furthermore, upregulation of CEACAM6 expression has been observed to contribute to gemcitabine chemoresistance, whilst its inhibition sensitized cells to gemcitabine-induced cytotoxicity (80).
Mechanistically, CEACAM6 interacts with ECM components, such as fibronectin, through α5β1 and αvβ3 integrins, thereby enhancing anchorage-independent survival (17,47). These diverse roles, ranging from EMT and immune evasion to chemoresistance and angiogenesis, highlight the role of CEACAM6 in PDAC progression and as a promising therapeutic target (Fig. 3) (81,82).
CEACAM6 serves a key role in mediating interactions with ECM components, influencing PDAC progression, therapeutic resistance and tumor microenvironment dynamics. Although the majority of the currently known functional insights stem from studies in other malignancies, including lung adenocarcinoma, where CEACAM6 promotes cisplatin resistance and is regulated by miR-146a and miR-26a, the relevance of CEACAM6 to PDAC is becoming increasingly evident (83,84).
In the tumor microenvironment, CEACAM6 can modulate cell adhesion, migration and drug resistance through homotypic and heterotypic cell-cell interactions involving integrin receptors (14,17,45). CEACAM6 activates integrin signaling cascades, particularly those involving α5β1 and αvβ3 integrins, which are known to interact with various ECM components, such as laminin, fibronectin, collagen and hyaluronan (85). These interactions contribute to anchorage-independent survival, EMT and chemoresistance in PDAC (14,17).
A previous study has revealed that CEACAM6 can regulate integrin-mediated signaling through PI3K/Akt activation, which are mechanisms observed in lung and breast cancer and are likely conserved in PDAC (16). By contrast, CEACAM1 has been shown to require tyrosine phosphorylation for interaction with β3 integrin in melanoma, suggesting a broader CEACAM-integrin signaling axis (26,86,87).
Despite evidence of oncogenic roles, including angiogenesis, invasion, resistance to apoptosis and immune evasion, the molecular mechanisms underlying the interaction of CEACAM6 with the ECM and the contribution to desmoplastic remodeling in PDAC remain inadequately characterized (16,73,88-90). CEACAM6 may influence the fibroinflammatory remodeling of the ECM, but this desmoplastic interaction remains underexplored (91). Understanding how CEACAM6 interacts with ECM receptors and regulates PDAC cell behavior is essential. As shown in Fig. 4, STRING-based protein-protein interaction analysis indicates that CEACAM6 is connected with multiple integrin subunits [e.g. ITGA5, ITGA2, ITGB3, integrin β (ITGB)4 and ITGA6], which are key ECM receptors. These predicated and known associations suggest that CEACAM6 may influence integrin-mediated adhesion, signaling and ECM remodeling, thereby supporting its role as both a diagnostic marker and a therapeutic target in PDAC (Fig. 4).
The desmoplastic reaction in PDAC, marked by dense collagen deposition, activation of CAFs and altered ECM composition, is influenced by CEACAM6(14). GPI-anchored localization to lipid rafts facilitates clustering with integrins α5β1 and αvβ3, promoting adhesion to fibronectin, collagen I and hyaluronan, and forming signaling hubs that amplify matrix deposition and tumor cell survival (16,21). In addition, upregulation of CEACAM6 expression has been found to enhance fibronectin assembly, stimulate collagen cross-linking and stiffen the ECM (17).
CEACAM6 can also support CAF activation through α5β1-mediated FAK/Src signaling and TGF-β feedback, thereby sustaining myofibroblast differentiation (51,92,93). CEACAM6 upregulates MMP-2 and MMP-9 through the NF-κβ pathway and increases tissue inhibitors of MMP expression, thereby altering the proteolytic balance toward ECM accumulation (91). Furthermore, CEACAM6 promotes mechanotransduction through α5β1 and αvβ3 signaling, reinforcing fibrosis through Yes-associated protein/WW domain-containing transcription regulator 1 activation, whilst also driving hyaluronan accumulation and proteoglycan remodeling, all of which elevate interstitial fluid pressure and impair drug delivery (94).
Clinically, CEACAM6-driven desmoplasia can limit therapy efficacy by creating physical and pharmacological barriers (14,95). Future studies should explore the spatial heterogeneity of CEACAM6 expression, identify predictive biomarkers and optimize anti-desmoplastic interventions for PDAC management.
Integrins are heterodimeric transmembrane receptors consisting of 18 α and 18 β subunits that combine to form 24 distinct integrin receptors (96). The structural architecture of integrin subtypes is directly associated with their functional roles in PDAC progression (75). Structurally, each subunit includes a cytoplasmic tail, a transmembrane domain and a large extracellular region (97). While the β subunits anchor to the actomyosin cytoskeleton and transmit intracellular signals, the α subunits mediate selective binding to ECM proteins, including collagen and laminin (98,99). These subunits coordinate to form functional integrin receptors that engage various ECM glycoproteins, such as collagen, laminins and fibronectin, thereby facilitating bidirectional signaling between tumor cells and their microenvironment (100).
In PDAC, integrin-mediated signaling can activate several oncogenic pathways, including the Ras/MAPK, PI3K/Akt and Rho-GTPase cascades (101,102). ITGB5 expression, which is upregulated by TGF-β signaling in CAFs, has been documented to contribute to tumor growth and metastasis. By contrast, inhibition of TGF-β using LY2157299 in murine models could reduce ITGB5 expression, leading to smaller tumors and improved survival (103,104).
Other integrin subtypes also serve distinct roles in PDAC. Integrin α3 can upregulate the EMT transcription factor zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1) and activate JNK, thereby promoting chemoresistance and metastasis (105). ITGB4, which is elevated in PDAC, can also enhance local invasion and metastasis through the MEK1/ERK1/2 cascade and FAK binding (105-108). Although ITGB4 is known to facilitate cell migration and invasion, its precise mechanistic role in PDAC remains to be fully elucidated. The structural basis for ITGB4 activation involves tyrosine phosphorylation at Y1510, which induces conformational changes that facilitate downstream oncogenic signaling and crosstalk with EGFR pathways. ITGB4 engages in crosstalk with EGFR, promoting tumor cell proliferation, drug resistance and signaling interplay central to PDAC pathogenesis (83,109,110).
Beyond the classical integrin subunits, other CEACAM family members, such as CEACAM1, can contribute to integrin-associated signaling in PDAC through their roles in immune modulation, angiogenesis and adhesion regulation (86). CEACAM1 is a valuable clinical biomarker and a promising therapeutic target in pancreatic cancer due to its N-terminal IgV-like domain and ≤3 constant C2-like domains, which enable diverse functional roles in tumor biology (53). CEACAM1 has been found to exhibit immunomodulatory functions, where the structural domains facilitate co-inhibitory activities by inhibiting T-cell receptor signaling through the recruitment of SHP-1 and SHP-2(87). Importantly, CEACAM1 can also interact with integrins, such as β2 integrins on immune cells and β3 integrins on endothelial cells, thereby influencing adhesion and co-inhibitory signaling (87). CEACAM1 can promote angiogenesis through the VEGFR2 pathway, which may inform the development of anti-angiogenic therapeutic strategies (111).
Despite advances in structural biology, the complete 3D architecture of integrin receptors remains to be fully resolved, particularly the structural basis for integrin signaling. Further research into integrin-CEACAM interactions and downstream signaling mechanisms is essential to understand their role in PDAC progression and therapeutic resistance.
Integrins are essential mediators of cell-ECM interactions in PDAC, influencing cell adhesion, migration and intracellular signaling. By binding to specific ECM proteins, integrins initiate signal transduction pathways that regulate cancer progression and therapeutic resistance (112). Certain integrins can also serve as prognostic biomarkers in PDAC, being associated with disease severity and patient outcomes (92,93,111,112). For example, high ITGA2 expression correlates with shorter progression-free and overall survival times, as well as chemoresistance in PDA (113,114).
Integrins engage in signaling crosstalk with numerous growth factors and cytokines, including EGF, insulin growth factor and TGF-β, thereby influencing cellular behavior and ECM remodeling (115,116). ITGB1 can form heterodimers with α2, α4 and α5 subunits to mediate focal adhesions between tumor cells and the ECM (117). By contrast, cytoplasmic proteins, such as talin and kindlin, can regulate ligand affinity and integrin activation by linking integrins to the actin cytoskeleton (113-118). In addition, as illustrated in Fig. 1, talin may also functionally bridge integrins and CEACAMs within adhesion complexes. While direct physical binding between CEACAMs and talin has not been fully demonstrated, experimental evidence supports integrin-CEACAM co-localization and clustering in lipid rafts, which facilitates shared downstream signaling through Src/FAK pathways (16,19,47). This suggests that integrins and CEACAMs may operate with the same adhesion and signaling hubs. Integrins, including ITGB3, can be internalized through clathrin-mediated endocytosis when they are not under high mechanical tension (119,120).
Within the tumor microenvironment, CAFs can drive integrin-mediated desmoplasia (121). Integrin αvβ5 regulates the endocytosis and recycling of active α5β1, which sustains fibronectin matrix assembly and focal adhesion turnover (122). These processes enhance actomyosin contractility and ECM stiffening, thereby activating a fibroblast into myofibroblastic CAF phenotype that maintains ECM remodeling and promotes disease recurrence (121). Similarly, integrin α11β1 can mediate CAF-fibronectin interactions, enhancing PDAC cell migration (122). Integrin α3β1 binds to laminin-111, collagen I and laminin-332 in the ECM, to facilitate PDAC cell motility (123).
Targeting integrins in vitro has shown therapeutic potential. Monoclonal antibodies against α11 integrin have been developed to disrupt CAF adhesion to collagen and impair cancer cell invasion (123,124). In 3D models, PDAC cells migrated along fibroblast extensions using α5β1, which adhered to fibronectin deposited by CAFs (124). Integrins αvβ3, α5β1 and αvβ5 are involved in directing tumor invasion and ECM deposition (125). However, the molecular crosstalk between α11β1 and other integrins in PDAC remains poorly characterized.
Integrins can also interact with CEACAMs, co-localizing in lipid rafts where they cluster and modulate signaling. Specifically, CEACAM1 and CEACAM6 have been reported to associate with β1 and β4 integrins, enhancing adhesion and survival pathways in epithelial cancers (19). In PDAC, ITGB4, which influences tumorigenesis, is activated through tyrosine phosphorylation at Y1510, regulating downstream MEK1-ERK1/2 signaling (19,108). In addition, ITGB4 expression has been found to be upregulated in PDAC compared with in normal or inflamed pancreatic tissues (126). Its activation promotes EMT, metastasis and chemoresistance, making ITGB4 a potential prognostic marker (102,127). In gastric cancer, ECM protein 1 promotes metastasis and glycolytic activity through the ITGB4/FAK/SOX2/hypoxia-inducible factor-1α axis, suggesting a conserved oncogenic mechanism (126,127).
Additionally, ZEB1 can directly upregulate ITGA3 and ITGB1 by binding to their promoters, contributing to tumor cell proliferation and migration in PDAC (128). The integration of integrin-mediated signaling with EMT programs and fibroinflammatory remodeling emphasizes their role in tumor aggressiveness. Understanding the function of integrins and their molecular partners in PDAC is essential for the identification of novel therapeutic targets. Table I (74,105,111,129-134). summarizes the various integrins associated with PDAC pathogenesis and their functional roles in PDAC.
The interplay between CEACAM6 and integrins contributes to PDAC progression by regulating adhesion, migration and signaling dynamics within the tumor microenvironment (14,17). CEACAM6 mediates both homophilic interactions with other CEA family members and heterophilic interactions with integrins, particularly αvβ3 and α5β1 (16,17). These interactions facilitate cancer cell adhesion, invasion, EMT and resistance to anoikis (73,135,136). These interaction between CEACAM family members and various integrins, supported by both experimental and predictive evidence, are summarized in Table II (50,74,103,129,137,144-167).
CEACAM6 has been implicated in modulating integrin-dependent signaling, particularly through the activation of FAK and c-Src kinase pathways, which enhance integrin affinity for ECM proteins, such as fibronectin and vitronectin (17). In PDAC, CEACAM6 overexpression upregulates the activation state of α5β1 integrins without altering receptor abundance, promoting increased fibronectin binding, matrix assembly, and disruption of normal differentiation and survival mechanisms (139). Furthermore, CEACAM6-integrin crosstalk is not limited to cancer but also can regulate inflammatory and infectious diseases, including the role of CEACAM6 as a receptor for adherent-invasive E. coli in Crohn's disease (126), suggesting its functional versatility across pathologies (20,140). CEACAM6 has also been shown to facilitate lipid raft-mediated signaling, supporting uptake mechanisms and the phosphorylation of key downstream effectors, such as Akt and MAPK, through integrin-linked kinase (ILK) activation (141,142).
A previous study has demonstrated that clustering of CEACAM6 on the membrane could promote co-localization with integrin α5β1, which in turn activated the Akt and MAPK signaling cascades. This integration of CEA family proteins with integrin signaling reinforced malignant behaviors, such as enhanced cell-ECM adhesion, increased invasive capacity and survival under anchorage-independent conditions (141). Furthermore, STRING network analysis (Fig. 4) illustrated the functional protein-protein interaction landscape between CEACAM6 and key integrins. Protein-protein interactions were analyzed using the STRING database (version 11.5; https://string-db.org/). The query was performed using Homo sapiens as the organism. Interaction sources included experimental data, curated databases, co-expression, text mining, co-occurrence and homology. The confidence score threshold was set at 0.700 (high confidence). The resulting network was visualized in STRING, and interaction lines were color-coded based on the evidence channel (e.g., experimental, co-expression and text mining).
This bioinformatics representation consolidates experimental evidence and predictive modeling, reinforcing the functional relevance of CEACAM6-integrin networks in PDAC progression.
CEACAM6, a GPI-anchored adhesion molecule, clusters within lipid rafts and engages integrin receptors, particularly α5β1 and αvβ3(47). These interactions enhance integrin avidity for ECM ligands, such as fibronectin and vitronectin, facilitating stable cell-matrix adhesion and initiating downstream signal transduction (17). Upon co-localization with integrins, CEACAM6 promotes the activation of FAK and c-Src, leading to the phosphorylation of ILK and the subsequent activation of the PI3K/Akt and MAPK signaling pathways. This dual activation supports key malignant phenotypes, including sustained proliferation, survival and invasion (47).
CEACAM6 engages integrins, particularly αvβ3 and α5β1, to activate Akt signaling, conferring anoikis resistance under anchorage-independent conditions, a survival effect supported in multiple models, including colorectal, breast, lung and gastric cancer, where CEACAM6-driven upregulation of anti-apoptotic proteins, such as Bcl-2 and survivin (16,51,80,94,136,139). Additionally, CEACAM6 can modulate ECM remodeling by enhancing the expression and activity of MMP-2 and MMP-9, primarily through FAK- and NF-κB-dependent transcriptional regulation. This effect is mediated via its interactions with integrins, particularly α5β1 and αvβ3, which cluster with CEACAM6 in lipid rafts to activate FAK/Src signaling. The resulting upregulation of MMPs facilitates the degradation of the basement membrane, thereby promoting local invasion and metastatic dissemination (17,142).
CEACAM6-integrin signaling also contributes to EMT by downregulating E-cadherin and inducing mesenchymal markers, such as Snail and ZEB1, through the sustained activation of the Akt and MAPK pathways (143,144). These signaling cascades result in resistance to gemcitabine and other chemotherapeutic agents (103,143,144). In addition, CEACAM6-mediated integrin signaling can increase drug efflux and reinforce survival pathways, suppressing apoptotic responses to cytotoxic stress (103). The tumor microenvironment then further modulates CEACAM6-integrin dynamics. Increased matrix stiffness, cytokine gradients and altered ECM composition increase integrin signaling, reinforcing CEACAM6-mediated oncogenic programs in PDAC (103).
CEACAM6 and integrins are promising targets for the treatment of PDAC due to their roles in tumor adhesion, survival, invasion and chemoresistance (41). Monoclonal antibodies targeting CEACAM6 have exhibited preclinical efficacy by disrupting integrin interactions and downstream signaling pathways, thereby reducing invasion and metastasis (67). Similarly, integrin-specific strategies using α5β1 and αvβ3 inhibitors have been shown to impair tumor-ECM interactions and enhance chemosensitivity (145).
CAR-T therapies targeting CEACAM6 and associated CEACAM family members, such as CEACAM7, represent an emerging immunotherapeutic avenue that can overcome the immunosuppressive microenvironment found in PDAC (146). Combination strategies, pairing CEACAM6/integrin inhibitors with chemotherapy (gemcitabine) or matrix-modulating agents, have exhibited synergistic effects and offer promise in overcoming drug resistance (147).
Early-phase trials of anti-CEACAM6 antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates have reported favorable safety and preliminary efficacy, particularly in patients with high CEACAM6-urpregulated malignancies, such as colorectal and gastric cancers. In PDAC, these agents remain at the preclinical stage, where dual-specificity constructs such as CT109-SN-38 have demonstrated potent cytotoxicity in a pancreatic cancer model (148). Integrin inhibitors, particularly those targeting αvβ3 and α5β1, are currently undergoing phase I/II evaluation in several solid tumors, including melanoma, and lung cancer, where combination regimens generally outperforming monotherapy (149,150). Although clinical data in PDAC remain limited, a preclinical study suggested that the CEACAM6 and integrin expression levels are associated with treatment response (60). Additionally, CEACAM6-integrin expression profiles may predict chemotherapy sensitivity, supporting the development of personalized treatment approaches (17).
Therapeutic resistance remains an important barrier, mediated by pathway redundancy, tumor heterogeneity and microenvironmental adaptation (151,152). Subclonal variation in CEACAM6/integrin expression may lead to incomplete responses, whilst upregulation of alternative adhesion molecules can bypass targeted inhibition (153). By contrast, the desmoplastic and immunosuppressive microenvironment of PDAC limits drug delivery and the efficacy of immunotherapy (154,155). Furthermore, variable expression levels and a lack of standardized cut-off values complicate the development of biomarkers (60).
Although several CEACAM family members have been implicated in cancer biology, CEACAM6-integrin interactions hold significant clinical value across early diagnosis, prognosis, treatment selection and disease monitoring in PDAC (17,57). CEACAM6 expression is frequently upregulated, by ≤25-fold, in PDAC tissues and precursor lesions, making it a promising biomarker for early detection (57,75). High CEACAM6 expression levels are also associated with aggressive tumor subtypes and poor survival, serving as an independent prognostic marker regardless of KRAS status (14,60). This enables risk stratification and informed decisions on the use of intensified or experimental therapies and predicts treatment response. Elevated CEACAM6 expression is associated with gemcitabine resistance, whilst specific integrin expression patterns influence chemotherapy outcomes, supporting personalized therapeutic strategies (17,156).
Monitoring of circulating CEACAM6 and integrin-related proteins enables real-time assessment of treatment efficacy, providing a dynamic alternative to traditional imaging methods (17,157). Additionally, the strong association of CEACAM6/integrins with metastasis risk can inform post-treatment surveillance and the planning of adjuvant therapy (60).
Translating CEACAM6-integrin research into clinical application faces several key barriers. A major challenge is the lack of assay standardization, with varying methodologies across laboratories hindering reproducibility and cross-study comparison (158,159). Tumor heterogeneity further complicates clinical translation, since the expression of CEACAM6 and integrins varies within and between tumors (14,75). Therefore, single-site biopsies may misrepresent the full molecular landscape, limiting the accuracy of treatment decisions (160).
The dynamic expression of these molecules during disease progression and therapy adds complexity, requiring longitudinal monitoring that may be impractical in routine settings due to cost and infrastructure constraints (47,161,162). Additionally, unfavorable regulatory environments, particularly for advanced therapies, such as CAR-T cell therapies, necessitate specialized clinical trial designs that can prolong the approval process (163,164).
CEACAM6-integrin research is essential in transforming PDAC management through precision diagnostics, targeted therapies and real-time monitoring. Molecular profiling of CEACAM6-integrin expression will enable personalized treatment selection, guiding choices of chemotherapy, targeted agents or immunotherapies based on individual tumor characteristics. By contrast, the emergence of liquid biopsy platforms incorporating CEACAM6-integrin biomarkers, such as circulating tumor cells, extracellular vesicles and soluble proteins, offers a non-invasive method for monitoring disease progression and treatment response, allowing dynamic, real-time clinical decision-making (166,167).
Integrating CEACAM6-integrin targeting with immunotherapy or oncolytic virus platforms represents a compelling strategy to enhance antitumor immune responses by modulating the tumor microenvironment. In addition, the relevance of CEACAM6-integrin signaling across multiple tumor types suggests the potential for pan-cancer therapeutic strategies.
The present review aimed to highlight the crucial role of CEACAM6-integrin crosstalk in the pathogenesis of PDAC. CEACAM6, a GPI-anchored adhesion molecule, is frequently upregulated in PDAC, which contributes to tumor cell survival, immune evasion, chemoresistance and desmoplastic remodeling (14,17). Through lipid raft-mediated clustering, CEACAM6 co-localizes with integrins, particularly α5β1 and αvβ3, amplifying downstream oncogenic signaling through the FAK, Src, PI3K/Akt and MAPK pathways (47,48).
The CEACAM6-integrin axis facilitates anchorage-independent survival, EMT, matrix stiffening and CAF activation, which are hallmarks of PDAC aggressiveness. These interactions also contribute to resistance to chemotherapy by altering drug uptake and activating anti-apoptotic signaling pathways. CEACAM6-integrin co-expression serves as a prognostic marker and may guide personalized therapy. High CEACAM6 levels are associated with poor survival and gemcitabine resistance, whilst integrin profiles predict responsiveness to combination therapies. Despite promising therapeutic targets, pathway redundancy, tumor heterogeneity and assay standardization make PDAC management challenging.
Therapeutic strategies combining anti-CEACAM6 agents with integrin inhibitors, matrix-degrading enzymes or immunotherapies show synergistic potential. Additionally, there is a need to consider integrating CEACAM6-integrin biomarkers into clinical workflows through liquid biopsy approaches, such as blood-based assays of circulating tumor cells, extracellular vesicles or circulating tumor DNA (156-160). Future studies should explore isoform-specific functions, protein-protein interactions and temporal expression changes across disease stages. Mechanistic insights into CEACAM6-integrin signaling and its impact on ECM remodeling will be crucial for designing next-generation precision therapies in PDAC.
In conclusion, CEACAM6 and integrins represent critical regulators of PDAC progression through their influence on adhesion, survival signaling, desmoplasia and immune modulation. Their interactions activate oncogenic pathways, such as the FAK, PI3K/Akt and MAPK pathways, thereby enhancing tumor invasion, metastasis and therapeutic resistance. The lipid raft-mediated clustering of CEACAM6 with integrins, such as α5β1 and αvβ3, reinforces ECM remodeling, chemoresistance and anchorage-independent survival, whilst integrins themselves contribute to EMT, angiogenesis and immune evasion. These molecules shape a tumor microenvironment that is conducive to malignancy and hinders the effectiveness of therapy.
CEACAM6-integrin dynamics are essential in precision oncology in PDAC, ranging from biomarker-driven diagnostics to targeted therapies. Integrating molecular profiling with emerging treatments, such as CAR-T cells, bispecific antibodies and matrix-disruptive strategies, may overcome current limitations posed by tumor heterogeneity, signaling redundancy, and stromal barriers.
Not applicable.
Funding: No funding was received.
Not applicable.
AAK was responsible for conceptualization, literature review, drafting, writing, critical revision and final approval of the manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable. The author has read and approved the final manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The author declares they have no competing interests.
|
Zińczuk J, Zaręba K, Romaniuk W, Kamińska D, Nizioł M, Baszun M, Kędra B, Guzińska-Ustymowicz K and Pryczynicz A: Expression of chosen carcinoembryonic-related cell adhesion molecules in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) associated with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Int J Med Sci. 16:583–592. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Hu JX, Zhao CF, Chen WB, Liu QC, Li QW, Lin YY and Gao F: Pancreatic cancer: A review of epidemiology, trend, and risk factors. World J Gastroenterol. 27:4298–4321. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Pereira SP, Oldfield L, Ney A, Hart PA, Keane MG, Pandol SJ, Li D, Greenhalf W, Jeon CY, Koay EJ, et al: Early detection of pancreatic cancer. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 5:698–710. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kleeff J, Korc M, Apte M, La Vecchia C, Johnson CD, Biankin AV, Neale RE, Tempero M, Tuveson DA, Hruban RH and Neoptolemos JP: Pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2: 16022. 2016. | |
|
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 68:394–424. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Schober M, Jesenofsky R, Faissner R, Weidenauer C, Hagmann W, Michl P, Heuchel RL, Haas SL and Löhr JM: Desmoplasia and chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer. Cancers (Basel). 6:2137–2154. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Azizian A, Rühlmann F, Krause T, Bernhardt M, Jo P, König A, Kleiß M, Leha A, Ghadimi M and Gaedcke J: CA19-9 for detecting recurrence of pancreatic cancer. Sci Rep. 10(1332)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Goh SK, Gold G, Christophi C and Muralidharan V: Serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A mini review for surgeons. ANZ J Surg. 87:987–992. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Moffitt RA, Marayati R, Flate EL, Volmar KE, Loeza SG, Hoadley KA, Rashid NU, Williams LA, Eaton SC, Chung AH, et al: Virtual microdissection identifies distinct tumor- and stroma-specific subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Nat Genet. 47:1168–1178. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Tanase CP, Neagu M, Albulescu R and Hinescu ME: Advances in pancreatic cancer detection. Adv Clin Chem. 51:145–180. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Wang D, Li Y, Ge H, Ghadban T, Reeh M and Güngör C: The extracellular matrix: A key accomplice of cancer stem cell migration, metastasis formation, and drug resistance in PDAC. Cancers (Basel). 14(3998)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Janiszewska M, Primi MC and Izard T: Cell adhesion in cancer: Beyond the migration of single cells. J Biol Chem. 295:2495–2505. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Cox TR: The matrix in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 21:217–238. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Pandey R, Zhou M, Islam S, Chen B, Barker NK, Langlais P, Srivastava A, Luo M, Cooke LS, Weterings E and Mahadevan D: Carcinoembryonic antigen cell adhesion molecule 6 (CEACAM6) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA): An integrative analysis of a novel therapeutic target. Sci Rep. 9(18347)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Han ZW, Lyv ZW, Cui B, Wang YY, Cheng JT, Zhang Y, Cai WQ, Zhou Y, Ma ZW, Wang XW, et al: The old CEACAMs find their new role in tumor immunotherapy. Invest New Drugs. 38:1888–1898. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Johnson B and Mahadevan D: Emerging role and targeting of carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 6 (CEACAM6) in human malignancies. Clin Cancer Drugs. 2:100–111. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Duxbury MS, Ito H, Ashley SW and Whang EE: c-Src-dependent cross-talk between CEACAM6 and alphavbeta3 integrin enhances pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell adhesion to extracellular matrix components. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 317:133–141. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Hatakeyama K, Wakabayashi-Nakao K, Ohshima K, Sakura N, Yamaguchi K and Mochizuki T: Novel protein isoforms of carcinoembryonic antigen are secreted from pancreatic, gastric and colorectal cancer cells. BMC Res Notes. 6(381)2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Blumenthal RD, Leon E, Hansen HJ and Goldenberg DM: Expression patterns of CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 in primary and metastatic cancers. BMC Cancer. 7(2)2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zhang Y, Zang M, Li J, Ji J, Zhang J, Liu X, Qu Y, Su L, Li C, Yu Y, et al: CEACAM6 promotes tumor migration, invasion, and metastasis in gastric cancer. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 46:283–290. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Tchoupa AK, Schuhmacher T and Hauck CR: Signaling by epithelial members of the CEACAM family-mucosal docking sites for pathogenic bacteria. Cell Commun Signal. 12(27)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Wu G, Wang D, Xiong F, Wang Q, Liu W, Chen J and Chen Y: The emerging roles of CEACAM6 in human cancer (Review). Int J Oncol. 64(27)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Valdembri D and Serini G: The roles of integrins in cancer. Fac Rev. 10(45)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kuespert K, Pils S and Hauck CR: CEACAMs: Their role in physiology and pathophysiology. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 18:565–571. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Schölzel S, Zimmermann W, Schwarzkopf G, Grunert F, Rogaczewski B and Thompson J: Carcinoembryonic antigen family members CEACAM6 and CEACAM7 are differentially expressed in normal tissues and oppositely deregulated in hyperplastic colorectal polyps and early adenomas. Am J Pathol. 156:595–605. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zimmermann W and Kammerer R: Carcinoembryonic antigen. Tumor-Associated Antigens: Identification, Characterization, and Clinical Applications, pp201-218, 2009. | |
|
Gold P and Freedman SO: Specific carcinoembryonic antigens of the human digestive system. J Exp Med. 122:467–481. 1965.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Gray-Owen SD and Blumberg RS: CEACAM1: Contact-dependent control of immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 6:433–446. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Bonsor DA, Günther S, Beadenkopf R, Beckett D and Sundberg EJ: Diverse oligomeric states of CEACAM IgV domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 112:13561–13566. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Noworolska A, Harłozińska A, Richter R and Brodzka W: Non-specific cross-reacting antigen (NCA) in individual maturation stages of myelocytic cell series. Br J Cancer. 51:371–377. 1985.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Hanenberg H, Baumann M, Quentin I, Nagel G, Grosse-Wilde H, von Kleist S, Göbel U, Burdach S and Grunert F: Expression of the CEA gene family members NCA-50/90 and NCA-160 (CD66) in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemias (ALLs) and in cell lines of B-cell origin. Leukemia. 8:2127–2133. 1994.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chan CHF and Stanners CP: Novel mouse model for carcinoembryonic antigen-based therapy. Mol Ther. 9:775–785. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Blumenthal RD, Hansen HJ and Goldenberg DM: Inhibition of adhesion, invasion, and metastasis by antibodies targeting CEACAM6 (NCA-90) and CEACAM5 (carcinoembryonic antigen). Cancer Res. 65:8809–8817. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Skubitz KM: The role of CEACAM s in neutrophil function. Eur J Clin Invest. 54 (Suppl 2)(e14349)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Schumann D, Huang J, Clarke PE, Kirshner J, Tsai SW, Schumaker VN and Shively JE: Characterization of recombinant soluble carcinoembryonic antigen cell adhesion molecule 1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 318:227–233. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Lu R, Pan H and Shively JE: CEACAM1 negatively regulates IL-1β production in LPS activated neutrophils by recruiting SHP-1 to a SYK-TLR4-CEACAM1 complex. PLoS Pathog. 8(e1002597)2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Klaile E, Vorontsova O, Sigmundsson K, Müller MM, Singer BB, Ofverstedt LG, Svensson S, Skoglund U and Obrink B: The CEACAM1 N-terminal Ig domain mediates cis- and trans-binding and is essential for allosteric rearrangements of CEACAM1 microclusters. J Cell Biol. 187:553–567. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Markel G, Achdout H, Katz G, Ling KL, Salio M, Gruda R, Gazit R, Mizrahi S, Hanna J, Gonen-Gross T, et al: Biological function of the soluble CEACAM1 protein and implications in TAP2-deficient patients. Eur J Immunol. 34:2138–2148. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kiriyama S, Yokoyama S, Ueno M, Hayami S, Ieda J, Yamamoto N, Yamaguchi S, Mitani Y, Nakamura Y, Tani M, et al: CEACAM1 long cytoplasmic domain isoform is associated with invasion and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 21 (Suppl 4):S505–S514. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Shamsuddin SHB: Biosensors for detection of colorectal cancer. University of Leeds, 2018. | |
|
Chan CHF and Stanners CP: Recent advances in the tumour biology of the GPI-anchored carcinoembryonic antigen family members CEACAM5 and CEACAM6. Curr Oncol. 14:70–73. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Chiang WF, Cheng TM, Chang CC, Pan SH, Changou CA, Chang TH, Lee KH, Wu SY, Chen YF, Chuang KH, et al: Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 6 (CEACAM6) promotes EGF receptor signaling of oral squamous cell carcinoma metastasis via the complex N-glycosylation. Oncogene. 37:116–127. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Swords DS, Firpo MA, Scaife CL and Mulvihill SJ: Biomarkers in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Current perspectives. Onco Targets Ther. 9:7459–7467. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Thomas J, Klebanov A, John S, Miller LS, Vegesna A, Amdur RL, Bhowmick K and Mishra L: CEACAMS 1, 5, and 6 in disease and cancer: Interactions with pathogens. Genes Cancer. 14:12–29. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ordonez C, Zhai AB, Camacho-Leal P, Demarte L, Fan MM and Stanners CP: GPI-anchored CEA family glycoproteins CEA and CEACAM6 mediate their biological effects through enhanced integrin alpha5beta1-fibronectin interaction. J Cell Physiol. 210:757–765. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kelleher M, Singh R, O'Driscoll CM and Melgar S: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEACAM) family members and inflammatory bowel disease. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 47:21–31. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Al-Khinji A: 122 CEACAM6 molecules mediate cell adhesion and signaling by modifying integrins in human solid tumors. J Clin Transl Sci. 9 (Suppl 1)(S35)2025. | |
|
Zhao D, Cai F, Liu X, Li T, Zhao E, Wang X and Zheng Z: CEACAM6 expression and function in tumor biology: A comprehensive review. Discov Oncol. 15(186)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Dhasmana A, Dhasmana S, Kotnala S, Laskar P, Khan S, Haque S, Jaggi M, Yallapu MM and Chauhan SC: CEACAM7 expression contributes to early events of pancreatic cancer. J Adv Res. 55:61–72. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Raj D, Nikolaidi M, Garces I, Lorizio D, Castro NM, Caiafa SG, Moore K, Brown NF, Kocher HM, Duan X, et al: CEACAM7 is an effective target for CAR T-cell therapy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 27:1538–1552. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Pavlopoulou A and Scorilas A: A comprehensive phylogenetic and structural analysis of the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) gene family. Genome Biol Evol. 6:1314–1326. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Rizeq B, Zakaria Z and Ouhtit A: Towards understanding the mechanisms of actions of carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 6 in cancer progression. Cancer Sci. 109:33–42. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Beauchemin N and Arabzadeh A: Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecules (CEACAMs) in cancer progression and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 32:643–671. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zhao L, Li T, Zhou Y, Wang P and Luo L: Monoclonal antibody targeting CEACAM1 enhanced the response to anti-PD1 immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. Int Immunopharmacol. 143(113395)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Singer BB: CEACAMs. In Encyclopedia of Signaling Molecules. Springer, pp1-9, 2016. | |
|
Tilki D, Singer BB, Shariat SF, Behrend A, Fernando M, Irmak S, Buchner A, Hooper AT, Stief CG, Reich O and Ergün S: CEACAM1: A novel urinary marker for bladder cancer detection. Eur Urol. 57:648–654. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Simeone DM, Ji B, Banerjee M, Arumugam T, Li D, Anderson MA, Bamberger AM, Greenson J, Brand RE, Ramachandran V and Logsdon CD: CEACAM1, a novel serum biomarker for pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 34:436–443. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ji B, Simeone D, Ramachandran V, Arumugam T, Hanash S, Giordano T, Greenson J, Taylor J and Logsdon CD: CEACAM1 is a biomarker for pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 29:336–337. 2004. | |
|
Shi JF, Xu SX, He P and Xi ZH: Expression of carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1(CEACAM1) and its correlation with angiogenesis in gastric cancer. Pathol Res Pract. 210:473–476. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kurlinkus B, Ger M, Kaupinis A, Jasiunas E, Valius M and Sileikis A: CEACAM6's role as a chemoresistance and prognostic biomarker for pancreatic cancer: A comparison of CEACAM6's diagnostic and prognostic capabilities with those of CA19-9 and CEA. Life (Basel). 11(542)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Qian W, Huang P, Liang X, Chen Y and Guan B: High expression of carcinoembryonic antigen-associated cell adhesion molecule 1 is associated with microangiogenesis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Transl Cancer Res. 9:4762–4769. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zhou M, Jin Z, Liu Y, He Y, Du Y, Yang C, Wang Y, Hu J, Cui L, Gao F and Cao M: Up-regulation of carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 in gastrointestinal cancer and its clinical relevance. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 49:737–743. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kim WM, Huang YH, Gandhi A and Blumberg RS: CEACAM1 structure and function in immunity and its therapeutic implications. Semin Immunol. 42(101296)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Lu R, Kujawski M, Pan H and Shively JE: Tumor angiogenesis mediated by myeloid cells is negatively regulated by CEACAM1. Cancer Res. 72:2239–2250. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Dong J, Wang B, Wang D, Ni J, Bu T, Wang H, Nayak B, Wang B, Dong X and Zhang Y: Abstract 2732: NB203: A novel therapeutic bispecific antibody targeting CEACAM1/VEGF for tumor immunity and angiogenesis modulation in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Res. 84 (6 Suppl)(S2732)2024. | |
|
Zuo J, Wang Y, Chen Z, Li H, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Zhang L and Chen J: Development of CEACAM1-specific CAR-T cells for the treatment of malignant melanoma. Oncol Rep. 49(72)2023. | |
|
Huang Y, Wang H, Lichtenberger J, Zhang J, Kappes J and Wu Y: CEACAM1 as a potential therapeutic target in melanoma and other malignancies. Front Oncol. 9(1072)2019. | |
|
Partyka K, Maupin KA, Brand RE and Haab BB: Diverse monoclonal antibodies against the CA 19-9 antigen show variation in binding specificity with consequences for clinical interpretation. Proteomics. 12:2212–2220. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Yang L, Liu Y, Zhang B, Yu M, Huang F, Zeng J, Lu Y and Yang C: CEACAM1 is a prognostic biomarker and correlated with immune cell infiltration in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Dis Markers. 2023(3606362)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ligorio M, Sil S, Malagon-Lopez J, Nieman LT, Misale S, Di Pilato M, Ebright RY, Karabacak MN, Kulkarni AS, Liu A, et al: Stromal microenvironment shapes the intratumoral architecture of pancreatic cancer. Cell. 178:160–175.e27. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Gisina A, Novikova S, Kim Y, Sidorov D, Bykasov S, Volchenko N, Kaprin A, Zgoda V, Yarygin K and Lupatov A: CEACAM5 overexpression is a reliable characteristic of CD133-positive colorectal cancer stem cells. Cancer Biomark. 32:85–98. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Chen J, Li Q, An Y, Lv N, Xue X, Wei J, Jiang K, Wu J, Gao W, Qian Z, et al: CEACAM6 induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition and mediates invasion and metastasis in pancreatic cancer. Int J Oncol. 43:877–885. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Witzens-Harig M, Hose D, Jünger S, Pfirschke C, Khandelwal N, Umansky L, Seckinger A, Conrad H, Brackertz B, Rème T, et al: Tumor cells in multiple myeloma patients inhibit myeloma-reactive T cells through carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule-6. Blood. 121:4493–4503. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kemper M, Schiecke A, Maar H, Nikulin S, Poloznikov A, Galatenko V, Tachezy M, Gebauer F, Lange T, Riecken K, et al: Integrin alpha-V is an important driver in pancreatic adenocarcinoma progression. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 40(214)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Mahadevan D, Pandey R, Chen Y, Essif J and Al-Khinji A: Oncogenic roles of CEACAM6 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 38 (15 Suppl)(e16744)2020. | |
|
Kim H, Woo CG, Son SM, Lee YP, Kim HK, Yang Y, Kwon J, Lee KH, Lee HC, Lee OJ and Han HS: Targeted suppression of CEACAM6 via pHLIP-delivered rnas in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Medicina (Kaunas). 61(598)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Wu J, Pan TH, Xu S, Jia LT, Zhu LL, Mao JS, Zhu YL and Cai JT: The virus-induced protein APOBEC3G inhibits anoikis by activation of Akt kinase in pancreatic cancer cells. Sci Rep. 5(12230)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zang M, Zhang Y, Zhang B, Hu L, Li J, Fan Z, Wang H, Su L, Zhu Z, Li C, et al: CEACAM6 promotes tumor angiogenesis and vasculogenic mimicry in gastric cancer via FAK signaling. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1852:1020–1028. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Niu G, Murad YM, Gao H, Hu S, Guo N, Jacobson O, Nguyen TD, Zhang J and Chen X: Molecular targeting of CEACAM6 using antibody probes of different sizes. J Control Release. 161:18–24. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ma RX, Wei JR and Hu YW: Characteristics of carcinoembryonic antigen related cell adhesion molecules and their relationship to cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 23:939–948. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Hanahan D: Hallmarks of cancer: New dimensions. Cancer Discov. 12:31–46. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Te Molder L, Kreft M, Heemskerk N, Schuring J, de Pereda JM, Wilhelmsen K and Sonnenberg A: EGFR-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of integrin β4 is not required for downstream signaling events in cancer cell lines. Sci Rep. 11(8675)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Du H, Li Y, Sun R, Yuan Y, Sun S and Zhang Y: CEACAM6 promotes cisplatin resistance in lung adenocarcinoma and is regulated by microRNA-146a and microRNA-26a. Thorac Cancer. 11:2473–2482. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ambrosi C, Scribano D, Sarshar M, Zagaglia C, Singer BB and Palamara AT: Acinetobacter baumannii targets human carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecules (CEACAMs) for invasion of pneumocytes. mSystems. 5:e00604–20. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Al Khinji A: Carcinoembryonic antigen cell adhesion molecule 6 enhances invasiveness and immune suppression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 2022. | |
|
Chen Z, Chen L, Qiao SW, Nagaishi T and Blumberg RS: Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 inhibits proximal TCR signaling by targeting ZAP-70. J Immunol. 180:6085–6093. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Götz L, Rueckschloss U, Ergün S and Kleefeldt F: CEACAM1 in vascular homeostasis and inflammation. Eur J Clin Invest. 54 (Suppl 2)(e14345)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Lee EH, Kim HT, Chun SY, Chung JW, Choi SH, Lee JN, Kim BS, Yoo ES, Kwon TG, Kim TH and Ha YS: Role of the JNK pathway in bladder cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 15:963–971. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Liao J, Chen R, Lin B, Deng R, Liang Y, Zeng J, Ma S and Qiu X: Cross-Talk between the TGF-β and cell adhesion signaling pathways in cancer. Int J Med Sci. 21:1307–1320. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kim EY, Cha YJ, Jeong S and Chang YS: Overexpression of CEACAM6 activates Src-FAK signaling and inhibits anoikis, through homophilic interactions in lung adenocarcinomas. Transl Oncol. 20(101402)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Do CTP, Prochnau JY, Dominguez A, Wang P and Rao MK: The road ahead in pancreatic cancer: Emerging trends and therapeutic prospects. Biomedicines. 12(1979)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Chen K, Li Y, Guo Z, Zeng Y and Zhang W: Identification of CEACAM6 as a biomarker for circulating tumor cells and its clinical significance in pancreatic cancer. Front Oncol. 11(659133)2021. | |
|
Primac I, Maquoi E, Blacher S, Heljasvaara R, Van Deun J, Smeland HY, Canale A, Louis T, Stuhr L, Sounni NE, et al: Stromal integrin α11 regulates PDGFR-β signaling and promotes breast cancer progression. J Clin Invest. 129:4609–4628. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Hartupee C, Nagalo BM, Chabu CY, Tesfay MZ, Coleman-Barnett J, West JT and Moaven O: Pancreatic cancer tumor microenvironment is a major therapeutic barrier and target. Front Immunol. 15(1287459)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
González-Amaro R and Sánchez-Madrid F: Cell adhesion molecules: Selectins and integrins. rit Rev Immunol. 19:389–429. 1999.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Aplin AE, Howe A, Alahari SK and Juliano RL: Signal transduction and signal modulation by cell adhesion receptors: The role of integrins, cadherins, immunoglobulin-cell adhesion molecules, and selectins. Pharmacol Rev. 50:197–263. 1998.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Gao J and Nakamura F: Actin-associated proteins and small molecules targeting the actin cytoskeleton. Int J Mol Sci. 23(2118)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Nishiuchi R, Takagi J, Hayashi M, Ido H, Yagi Y, Sanzen N, Tsuji T, Yamada M and Sekiguchi K: Ligand-binding specificities of laminin-binding integrins: A comprehensive survey of laminin-integrin interactions using recombinant alpha3beta1, alpha6beta1, alpha7beta1 and alpha6beta4 integrins. Matrix Biol. 25:189–197. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Brassart-Pasco S, Brézillon S, Brassart B, Ramont L, Oudart JB and Monboisse JC: Tumor microenvironment: Extracellular matrix alterations influence tumor progression. Front Oncol. 10(397)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Giancotti FG and Tarone G: Positional control of cell fate through joint integrin/receptor protein kinase signaling. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 19:173–206. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ivaska J and Heino J: Cooperation between integrins and growth factor receptors in signaling and endocytosis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 27:291–320. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Cabodi S, Moro L, Bergatto E, Boeri Erba E, Di Stefano P, Turco E, Tarone G and Defilippi P: Integrin regulation of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor and of EGF-dependent responses. Biochem Soc Trans. 32:438–442. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Hurtado de Mendoza T, Mose ES, Botta GP, Braun GB, Kotamraju VR, French RP, Suzuki K, Miyamura N, Teesalu T, Ruoslahti E, et al: Tumor-penetrating therapy for β5 integrin-rich pancreas cancer. Nat Commun. 12(1541)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Tsai YT, Wu AC, Yang WB, Kao TJ, Chuang JY, Chang WC and Hsu TI: ANGPTL4 induces TMZ resistance of glioblastoma by promoting cancer stemness enrichment via the EGFR/AKT/4E-BP1 cascade. Int J Mol Sci. 20(5625)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Masugi Y, Yamazaki K, Emoto K, Effendi K, Tsujikawa H, Kitago M, Itano O, Kitagawa Y and Sakamoto M: Upregulation of integrin β4 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and is a novel prognostic marker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Lab Invest. 95:308–319. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Weinel RJ, Rosendahl A, Pinschmidt E, Kisker O, Simon B and Santoso S: The alpha 6-integrin receptor in pancreatic carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 108:523–532. 1995.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Meng X, Liu P, Wu Y, Liu X, Huang Y, Yu B, Han J, Jin H and Tan X: Integrin beta 4 (ITGB4) and its tyrosine-1510 phosphorylation promote pancreatic tumorigenesis and regulate the MEK1-ERK1/2 signaling pathway. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 20:106–116. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Jeong BY, Cho KH, Jeong KJ, Park YY, Kim JM, Rha SY, Park CG, Mills GB, Cheong JH and Lee HY: Rab25 augments cancer cell invasiveness through a β1 integrin/EGFR/VEGF-A/Snail signaling axis and expression of fascin. Exp Mol Med. 50(e435)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Schinke H, Shi E, Lin Z, Quadt T, Kranz G, Zhou J, Wang H, Hess J, Heuer S, Belka C, et al: A transcriptomic map of EGFR-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition identifies prognostic and therapeutic targets for head and neck cancer. Mol Cancer. 21(178)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Calinescu A, Turcu G, Nedelcu RI, Brinzea A, Hodorogea A, Antohe M, Diaconu C, Bleotu C, Pirici D, Jilaveanu LB, et al: On the dual role of carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM1) in human malignancies. J Immunol Res. 2018(7169081)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Cavaco ACM, Rezaei M, Caliandro MF, Lima AM, Stehling M, Dhayat SA, Haier J, Brakebusch C and Eble JA: The interaction between laminin-332 and α3β1 integrin determines differentiation and maintenance of CAFs, and supports invasion of pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma cells. Cancers (Basel). 11(14)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Aziz MH, Saida L, van Eijck CHJ and Mustafa DAM: Overexpression of the adhesion signaling pathway is linked to short-term survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreatology. 24:62–65. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Calderwood DA: Talin controls integrin activation. Biochem Soc Trans. 32:434–437. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Moser M, Legate KR, Zent R and Fässler R: The tail of integrins, talin, and kindlins. Science. 324:895–899. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Baig MMFA, Zhang QW, Younis MR and Xia XH: A DNA nanodevice simultaneously activating the EGFR and integrin for enhancing cytoskeletal activity and cancer cell treatment. Nano Lett. 19:7503–7513. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Liu M, Zhang Y, Yang J, Cui X, Zhou Z, Zhan H, Ding K, Tian X, Yang Z, Fung KMA, et al: ZIP4 increases expression of transcription factor ZEB1 to promote Integrin α3β1 signaling and inhibit expression of the gemcitabine transporter ENT1 in pancreatic cancer cells. Gastroenterology. 158:679–692.e1. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Yu CH, Rafiq NB, Cao F, Zhou Y, Krishnasamy A, Biswas KH, Ravasio A, Chen Z, Wang YH, Kawauchi K, et al: Integrin-beta3 clusters recruit clathrin-mediated endocytic machinery in the absence of traction force. Nat Commun. 6(8672)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ye F, Petrich BG, Anekal P, Lefort CT, Kasirer-Friede A, Shattil SJ, Ruppert R, Moser M, Fässler R and Ginsberg MH: The mechanism of kindlin-mediated activation of integrin αIIbβ3. Curr Biol. 23:2288–2295. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Baschieri F, Dayot S, Elkhatib N, Ly N, Capmany A, Schauer K, Betz T, Vignjevic DM, Poincloux R and Montagnac G: Frustrated endocytosis controls contractility-independent mechanotransduction at clathrin-coated structures. Nat Commun. 9(3825)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Franco-Barraza J, Francescone R, Luong T, Shah N, Madhani R, Cukierman G, Dulaimi E, Devarajan K, Egleston BL, Nicolas E, et al: Matrix-regulated integrin αvβ5 maintains α5β1-dependent desmoplastic traits prognostic of neoplastic recurrence. Elife. 6(e20600)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Harryman WL, Marr KD, Nagle RB and Cress AE: Integrins and epithelial-mesenchymal cooperation in the tumor microenvironment of muscle-invasive lethal cancers. Front Cell Dev Biol. 10(837585)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Myo Min KK, Ffrench CB, Jessup CF, Shepherdson M, Barreto SG and Bonder CS: Overcoming the fibrotic fortress in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Challenges and opportunities. Cancers (Basel). 15(2354)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Belhabib I, Zaghdoudi S, Lac C, Bousquet C and Jean C: Extracellular matrices and cancer-associated fibroblasts: Targets for cancer diagnosis and therapy? Cancers (Basel). 13(3466)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Schaffner F, Ray AM and Dontenwill M: Integrin α5β1, the fibronectin receptor, as a pertinent therapeutic target in solid tumors. Cancers (Basel). 5:27–47. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Gan L, Meng J, Xu M, Liu M, Qi Y, Tan C, Wang Y, Zhang P, Weng W, Sheng W, et al: Extracellular matrix protein 1 promotes cell metastasis and glucose metabolism by inducing integrin β4/FAK/SOX2/HIF-1α signaling pathway in gastric cancer. Oncogene. 37:744–755. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Yang H, Xu Z, Peng Y, Wang J and Xiang Y: Integrin β4 as a potential diagnostic and therapeutic tumor marker. Biomolecules. 11(1197)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Liu F, Wu Q, Dong Z and Liu K: Integrins in cancer: Emerging mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Pharmacol Ther. 247(108458)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Liu C, Wang M, Lv H, Liu B, Ya X, Zhao W and Wang W: CEACAM6 promotes cholangiocarcinoma migration and invasion by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition through inhibition of the SRC/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Oncol Lett. 23(39)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Schnittert J, Bansal R, Mardhian DF, van Baarlen J, Östman A and Prakash J: Integrin α11 in pancreatic stellate cells regulates tumor-stroma interactions in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancers. 11(14)2019.DOI: 10.3390/cancers11010014. | |
|
Chen X, Liu P, Wu Y, Liu X, Huang Y, Yu B, Han J, Jin H and Tan X: Integrin α3 promotes pancreatic cancer cell invasion by activating EGFR signaling and cytoskeletal remodeling. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 22:106–114. 2022.DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2022.6411. | |
|
Mia MM, Boersema M and Bank RA: αvβ1 Integrin-mediated activation of TGF-β controls αvβ6 integrin expression to promote pancreatic carcinoma progression. J Pathol. 253:367–382. 2021.DOI: 10.1002/path.5597. | |
|
Kuninty PR, Bansal R, De Geus SWL, Mardhian DF, Schnittert J, van Baarlen J, Storm G, Bijlsma MF, van Laarhoven HW, Metselaar JM, et al: ITGA5 inhibition in pancreatic stellate cells attenuates desmoplasia and potentiates efficacy of chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer. Sci Adv. 5(eaax2770)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Li X, Placencio V, Iturregui JM, Uwamariya C, Sharif-Afshar AR, Koyama T, Hayward SW and Bhowmick NA: Prostate fibroblast αvβ6 integrin expression drives prostate cancer progression via epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Oncogene. 34:881–890. 2015.DOI: 10.1038/onc.2014.19. | |
|
Humphries JD, Chastney MR, Askari JA and Humphries MJ: Signal transduction via integrin adhesion complexes. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 56:14–21. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zhu R, Ge J, Ma J and Zheng J: Carcinoembryonic antigen related cell adhesion molecule 6 promotes the proliferation and migration of renal cancer cells through the ERK/AKT signaling pathway. Transl Androl Urol. 8:457–466. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Barnich N, Carvalho FA, Glasser AL, Darcha C, Jantscheff P, Allez M, Peeters H, Bommelaer G, Desreumaux P, Colombel JF, et al: CEACAM6 acts as a receptor for adherent-invasive E. coli, supporting ileal mucosa colonization in Crohn disease. J Clin Invest. 117:1566–1574. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Fechter P, Cruz Da Silva E, Mercier MC, Noulet F, Etienne-Seloum N, Guenot D, Lehmann M, Vauchelles R, Martin S, Lelong-Rebel I, et al: RNA aptamers targeting integrin α5β1 as probes for Cyto- and histofluorescence in glioblastoma. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 17:63–77. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Schmitter T, Pils S, Weibel S, Agerer F, Peterson L, Buntru A, Kopp K and Hauck CR: Opa proteins of pathogenic neisseriae initiate Src kinase-dependent or lipid raft-mediated uptake via distinct human carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule isoforms. Infect Immun. 75:4116–4126. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zhang ZC, Zhao HF, Sun Z, Li Y, Zhong ML, Wang BH and Jiang XZ: Tripartite motif-containing 9 promoted proliferation and migration of bladder cancer cells through CEACAM6-Smad2/3 axis. J Cell Commun Signal. 17:1323–1333. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Monkman JH, Thompson EW and Nagaraj SH: Targeting epithelial mesenchymal plasticity in pancreatic cancer: A compendium of preclinical discovery in a heterogeneous disease. Cancers (Basel). 11(1745)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zhou R, Wu H, You H, Wang X, Yuan X, Sun Z, Zhou D, Jiang Y and Shen Y: ESPN activates ZEB1-mediated EMT through the PI3K/AKT/mTOR axis to promote osteosarcoma metastasis. J Transl Med. 23(527)2025.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Rice AJ, Cortes E, Lachowski D, Cheung BCH, Karim SA, Morton JP and Del Río Hernández A: Matrix stiffness induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition and promotes chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer cells. Oncogenesis. 6(e352)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Debreli Coskun M, Sudha T, Bharali DJ, Celikler S, Davis PJ and Mousa SA: αvβ3 integrin antagonists enhance chemotherapy response in an orthotopic pancreatic cancer model. Front Pharmacol. 11(95)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Farhangnia P, Khorramdelazad H, Nickho H and Delbandi AA: Current and future immunotherapeutic approaches in pancreatic cancer treatment. J Hematol Oncol. 17(40)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Cardenas KCA, Enos CW, Spear MR, Austin DE, Almofeez R, Kortchak S, Pincus L, Guo HB, Dolezal S, Pierce JM, et al: CT109-SN-38, a novel antibody-drug conjugate with dual specificity for CEACAM5 and 6, elicits potent killing of pancreatic cancer cells. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 24:720–732. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Topalovski M and Brekken RA: Matrix control of pancreatic cancer: New insights into fibronectin signaling. Cancer Lett. 381:252–258. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Belvisi L, Riccioni T, Marcellini M, Vesci L, Chiarucci I, Efrati D, Potenza D, Scolastico C, Manzoni L, Lombardo K, et al: Biological and molecular properties of a new alpha(v)beta3/alpha(v)beta5 integrin antagonist. Mol Cancer Ther. 4:1670–1680. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Sherman MH and Beatty GL: Tumor microenvironment in pancreatic cancer pathogenesis and therapeutic resistance. Annu Rev Pathol. 18:123–148. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Palma AM, Vudatha V, Peixoto ML and Madan E: Tumor heterogeneity: An oncogenic driver of PDAC progression and therapy resistance under stress conditions. Adv Cancer Res. 159:203–249. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Singer BB, Scheffrahn I, Kammerer R, Suttorp N, Ergun S and Slevogt H: Deregulation of the CEACAM expression pattern causes undifferentiated cell growth in human lung adenocarcinoma cells. PLoS One. 5(e8747)2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ju Y, Xu D, Liao MM, Sun Y, Bao WD, Yao F and Ma L: Barriers and opportunities in pancreatic cancer immunotherapy. NPJ Precis Oncol. 8(199)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Olaoba OT, Yang M, Adelusi TI, Maidens T, Kimchi ET, Staveley-O'Carroll KF and Li G: Targeted therapy for highly desmoplastic and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel). 16(1470)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Reader CS, Vallath S, Steele CW, Haider S, Brentnall A, Desai A, Moore KM, Jamieson NB, Chang D, Bailey P, et al: The integrin αvβ6 drives pancreatic cancer through diverse mechanisms and represents an effective target for therapy. J Pathol. 249:332–342. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Yang D, Tang Y, Fu H, Xu J, Hu Z, Zhang Y and Cai Q: Integrin β1 promotes gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer through Cdc42 activation of PI3K p110β signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 505:215–221. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kim H, Huh S, Park J, Han Y, Ahn KG, Noh Y, Lee SJ, Chu H, Kim SS, Jung HS, et al: Development of a fit-for-purpose multi-marker panel for early diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Mol Cell Proteomics. 23(100824)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Bukys T, Kurlinkus B, Sileikis A and Vitkus D: The prospect of improving pancreatic cancer diagnostic capabilities by implementing blood biomarkers: A study of evaluating properties of a single IL-8 and in conjunction with CA19-9, CEA, and CEACAM6. Biomedicines. 12(2344)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Sivapalan L, Kocher HM, Ross-Adams H and Chelala C: The molecular landscape of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreatology. 22:925–936. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Sivapalan L, Thorn GJ, Gadaleta E, Kocher HM, Ross-Adams H and Chelala C: Longitudinal profiling of circulating tumour DNA for tracking tumour dynamics in pancreatic cancer. BMC Cancer. 22(369)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Davidson C, Taggart D, Sims AH, Lonergan DW, Canel M and Serrels A: FAK promotes stromal PD-L2 expression associated with poor survival in pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 127:1893–1905. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
S S KD, Joga R, Srivastava S, Nagpal K, Dhamija I, Grover P and Kumar S: Regulatory landscape and challenges in CAR-T cell therapy development in the US, EU, Japan, and India. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 201(114361)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Sainatham C, Yadav D, Dilli Babu A, Tallapalli JR, Kanagala SG, Filippov E, Murillo Chavez F, Ahmed N and Lutfi F: The current socioeconomic and regulatory landscape of immune effector cell therapies. Front Med (Lausanne). 11(1462307)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Singhi AD, Koay EJ, Chari ST and Maitra A: Early detection of pancreatic cancer: Opportunities and challenges. Gastroenterology. 156:2024–2040. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Costa-Silva B, Aiello NM, Ocean AJ, Singh S, Zhang H, Thakur BK, Becker A, Hoshino A, Mark MT, Molina H, et al: Pancreatic cancer exosomes initiate pre-metastatic niche formation in the liver. Nat Cell Biol. 17:816–826. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Gebauer F, Wicklein D, Horst J, Sundermann P, Maar H, Streichert T, Tachezy M, Izbicki JR and Bockhorn M: Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 6 (CEACAM6) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: an independent prognostic marker and potential target for immunotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 21:2329–2337. 2014. | |
|
Zeltz C, Lu N and Gullberg D: Integrin α11β1: A major collagen receptor on fibroblastic cells. Adv Exp Med Biol. 819:73–83. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Brümmer J, Ebrahimnejad A, Flayeh R, Schumacher U, Löning T, Bamberger AM and Wagener C: cis Interaction of the cell adhesion molecule CEACAM1 with integrin beta(3). Am J Pathol. 159:537–546. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Vuijk FA, van Beijnum JR, Cleuren ACA, Bovenschen N, van Hinsbergh VWM and Griffioen AW: Co-expression of CEACAM5 with integrins in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and surrounding stroma: Association with fibrosis and lipid raft signaling. Cancers. 12(2857)2020.DOI: 10.3390/cancers12102857. |