Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Oncology Letters
      • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • Information for Authors
    • Information for Reviewers
    • Information for Librarians
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Spandidos Publications Logo
  • About
    • About Spandidos
    • Aims and Scopes
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Job Opportunities
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Contact
  • Journals
    • All Journals
    • Biomedical Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Epigenetics
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Functional Nutrition
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Molecular Medicine
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • International Journal of Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Medicine International
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular and Clinical Oncology
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Molecular Medicine Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Letters
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • Oncology Reports
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
    • World Academy of Sciences Journal
      • Information for Authors
      • Editorial Policies
      • Editorial Board
      • Aims and Scope
      • Abstracting and Indexing
      • Bibliographic Information
      • Archive
  • Articles
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Reviewers
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Conferences
  • Language Editing
Login Register Submit
  • This site uses cookies
  • You can change your cookie settings at any time by following the instructions in our Cookie Policy. To find out more, you may read our Privacy Policy.

    I agree
Search articles by DOI, keyword, author or affiliation
Search
Advanced Search
presentation
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
Join Editorial Board Propose a Special Issue
Print ISSN: 1792-0981 Online ISSN: 1792-1015
Journal Cover
October-2026 Volume 32 Issue 4

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

Journals

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.

Molecular Medicine Reports

Molecular Medicine Reports

Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.

Biomedical Reports

Biomedical Reports

Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.

World Academy of Sciences Journal

World Academy of Sciences Journal

Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.

International Journal of Epigenetics

International Journal of Epigenetics

Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.

Medicine International

Medicine International

An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.

Journal Cover
October-2026 Volume 32 Issue 4

Full Size Image

Sign up for eToc alerts
Recommend to Library

  • Article
  • Citations
    • Cite This Article
    • Download Citation
    • Create Citation Alert
    • Remove Citation Alert
    • Cited By
  • Similar Articles
    • Related Articles (in Spandidos Publications)
    • Similar Articles (Google Scholar)
    • Similar Articles (PubMed)
  • Download PDF
  • Download XML
  • View XML
Case Report Open Access

First case of neonatal bloodstream infection caused by Malassezia furfur in mainland China diagnosed via metagenomic next‑generation sequencing: A case report

  • Authors:
    • Shanshan Gao
    • Lanlan Song
    • Qiujuan Feng
    • Yazhen Li
    • Huiqiang Liang
    • Ke Lei
    • Zheng Li
    • Peter Kisembo
  • View Affiliations / Copyright

    Affiliations: Department of Laboratory Medicine, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, Guangdong 529000, P.R. China, Dongguan Key Laboratory of Public Health Laboratory Science, School of Public Health, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong 523808, P.R. China, Department of Radiology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, Guangdong 529000, P.R. China, Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine and The Centre for Gene Diagnosis, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430000, P.R. China
    Copyright: © Gao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
  • Article Number: 267
    |
    Published online on: August 6, 2026
       https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2026.13262
  • Expand metrics +
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

This article is mentioned in:


Abstract

The present study reports, to the best of our knowledge, the first case of neonatal bloodstream infection caused by Malassezia furfur in mainland China identified using metagenomic next‑generation sequencing (mNGS). Traditional microbiological methods have failed to identify causative organisms, highlighting the diagnostic limitations of neonatal sepsis with atypical presentations. Using this case as a clinical entry point, a systematic review was conducted to consolidate the epidemiological, clinical and prognostic characteristics of previously reported neonatal Malassezia infections and critically evaluate current diagnostic challenges. This case suggests the need to expand the pathogen spectrum of neonatal sepsis, particularly among extremely preterm and extremely low‑birth‑weight infants. Furthermore, it demonstrates the transformative potential of mNGS as an adjunctive diagnostic modality capable of identifying rare, fastidious organisms that evade conventional detection. Integrating mNGS into routine clinical workflows may not only facilitate early and precise pathogen identification but also redefine clinical decision‑making paradigms in neonatal infectious disease management. 

Introduction

Malassezia furfur (M. furfur) is a lipophilic yeast that is part of the normal human skin microbiota. Under specific conditions, it can transition to a pathogenic form (1,2). This organism possesses unique biological characteristics, notably a lipid-rich cell wall structure that requires exogenous long-chain fatty acids for growth (3). In immunocompetent individuals, M. furfur typically causes superficial infections such as pityriasis versicolor and folliculitis (4). However, in certain populations, particularly neonates, its infection can lead to life-threatening systemic disease (5). The pathogenic mechanisms involve biofilm formation, phospholipase secretion and immune evasion, rendering it a notable opportunistic pathogen in nosocomial infections (1,6,7).

Neonates are susceptible to M. furfur infections because of multiple interacting factors (6), including an underdeveloped skin barrier, characterized by a thin stratum corneum and incomplete intercellular junctions, which provide a physical pathway for pathogen invasion (8). Concurrently, an immature immune system, including reduced neutrophil activity and low complement levels, impairs pathogen clearance (9). Clinical interventions further exacerbate infection risk. For instance, lipid emulsions in parenteral nutrition serve as ideal media for fungal proliferation and central venous catheters (CVCs) offer surfaces for biofilm formation (10). These risk factors are synergistically amplified in preterm infants, positioning them as a high-risk group for invasive Malassezia infections.

Traditional fungal detection methods for M. furfur have notable limitations (11). Routine cultures require lipid supplementation, such as olive oil, and exhibit slow growth, typically taking 5-7 days, thereby resulting in a clinical laboratory detection rate <30%. Morphological identification relies on the characteristic ‘spaghetti and meatballs’ appearance under microscopy, which is often absent in systemic infection samples (12). Serological tests are hindered by immature antibody responses in neonates, leading to low sensitivity (13). These technical constraints contribute to missed or delayed diagnosis in >40% of invasive cases, highlighting key gaps in current diagnostic frameworks (14).

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) offers a promising solution for these diagnostic challenges (15). This technology captures all nucleic acid sequences in a sample without bias, thus eliminating the need for pathogen-specific primers or prior culture (16). Theoretically, mNGS can detect the entire microbial genome of a clinical specimen. Compared with traditional methods, mNGS has distinct advantages for detecting fastidious organisms, as it does not rely on pathogen viability, can identify unculturable microbes and enables simultaneous species identification and resistance gene profiling via bioinformatic analysis (17). Furthermore, the turn-around time is typically shortened to 24-48 h. Multiple studies have demonstrated the efficacy of mNGS in detecting bacterial pathogens in neonatal bloodstream infections (18,19); however, its utility in diagnosing fungal infections, especially lipid-dependent yeasts, remain underexplored (20).

The present study analyzed a representative M. furfur infection case and conducted a systematic review to illustrate the need to incorporate M. furfur detection into the routine fungal pathogen screening spectrum for neonatal bloodstream infections. The technical value of mNGS was evaluated for the detection of this organism. The present case report highlights the diagnostic improvements offered by mNGS over conventional methods, which include timely detection, enhanced capability for identifying polymicrobial infections and the beneficial impact on clinical decision-making. These findings are expected to provide evidence-based guidance for optimizing the diagnostic pathways involved in neonatal invasive fungal infections and to inform revisions of infection control strategies in intensive care units. The present case report provides specific attention to technological innovations in mNGS for detecting lipid-dependent fungi, with the aim of addressing current diagnostic blind-spots in neonatal fungal bloodstream infections.

Case report

This was a retrospective case-based study involving an infant male patient who was admitted to and treated in the neonatal intensive care unit of Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, Guangdong, China, and was subsequently diagnosed with bloodstream infection caused by M. furfur.

mNGS

Plasma was isolated from whole blood samples of the infant patient, and nucleic acids were extracted using a magnetic bead-based DNA/RNA Extraction Kit (cat. no. 2005-01; GenK) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Nucleic acid concentration and purity were assessed using an Equalbit 1x dsDNA HS Assay Kit (cat. no. EQ121-01; Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd.) on a Qubit™ 4 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). DNA libraries were constructed using a Pathogen Microbial DNA/RNA Library Preparation Kit (cat. no. 2102 GenK) following the standard procedures recommended by the manufacturer. Library concentration and fragment size were determined using a Qubit fluorometer and an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Inc.), respectively. After quality control, high-throughput sequencing was performed on the Illumina NextSeq™ 550Dx platform (Illumina, Inc.), generating 76-bp single-end reads. Throughout the workflow from nucleic acid extraction to library sequencing, negative template controls (NTCs) were included under a non-host-depletion protocol to monitor potential background microbial signals introduced during nucleic acid extraction, library preparation and DNA sequencing. Raw sequencing data were preprocessed using fastp v0.23.2 (OpenGene; HaploX Ltd.) to remove low-quality reads, adapter-contaminated reads, duplicate sequences and short reads (<50 bp), thereby generating high-quality clean reads. Subsequently, clean reads were aligned to the human reference genome T2T-CHM13 v.2.0 (GCA_009914755.4) using Bowtie v.2.3.5.1. The remaining non-human reads were mapped to a custom-built pathogen database using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA; v.0.7.17-r1198-dirty) and species annotation was performed using a defined species annotation algorithm. The final pathogen identification and reporting were based on established reporting thresholds in conjunction with clinical data (21). The reference microbial genome database included the complete genome sequences of bacteria, fungi, viruses and parasites.

The criteria for positive detection were as follows: i) At least one species-specific read for the detection of Mycobacterium, Nocardia and Legionella pneumophila; ii) at least three unique reads required for other bacteria, fungi, viruses and parasites; and iii) pathogens were excluded if the ratio of microorganism reads per million of a given sample to the NTC was <10.

Literature search

A literature search was performed using the PubMed database (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/advanced/). The search string used the keywords (Malassezia furfur) AND (newborn) AND (neonate) AND (infant) AND (infection) AND [(bloodstream) OR (blood) OR (plasma)] to identify relevant articles. The inclusion criteria were human neonates, confirmed M. furfur infection and reporting of detection methods and outcomes.

Birth history

The neonate was born via spontaneous vaginal delivery at a gestational age of 25 weeks and 2 days with a birth weight of 660 g, length of 32 cm and head circumference of 22 cm. He was admitted to and treated in the neonatal intensive care unit of Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, Guangdong, China. There was no premature rupture of membranes (0 h) and no evidence of intrauterine distress (0 h). The fetal heart rate was normal and umbilical cord entanglement was not observed around the neck. The amniotic fluid was clear, and the placenta appeared normal.

Present illness history

At birth, the patient exhibited no spontaneous respiration, generalized cyanosis, poor responsiveness or hypotonia of the four limbs. The heart rate was 80-90 beats per min. Immediate resuscitation measures were initiated, including endotracheal intubation and positive-pressure ventilation using a T-piece resuscitator. Pulmonary surfactant (Curosurf®; 120 mg) was administered for replacement therapy. Following intervention, the neonate's skin color and responsiveness gradually improved, with no signs of oral frothing. The Apgar score at 1 min was 4 (with 2 points deducted for respiration and 1 point each deducted for heart rate, responsiveness, muscle tone and skin color), which improved to 8 at 5 min (2 points deducted for respiration) and 9 at 10 min (1 point deducted for respiration). After obtaining parental consent, the patient was transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for further treatment. Antenatal corticosteroid therapy (dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 10 mg intramuscular injection once daily, administered for 2 consecutive days in January 2025 promoted fetal lung maturation.

Diagnostic and therapeutic course

During hospitalization, the patient experienced a complex clinical course, characterized by immature pulmonary function, recurrent infections, feeding intolerance and inadequate weight gain. As hyaline membrane disease was suspected, the patient received two separate 10-day courses of dexamethasone, one in January and the second 4 weeks later. In early February, a sputum culture revealed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, prompting the initiation of linezolid treatment. In mid-February, signs of infection recurred and the blood culture identified Escherichia coli, leading to a change in therapy to a combination of meropenem and linezolid. A follow-up blood culture performed in late February returned negative results.

In early March, after >3 weeks of broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy, the patient again exhibited clinical deterioration, including decreased responsiveness, abdominal distension, intermittent hypoxia, fever and generalized hyporesponsiveness. In March, CRP levels increased sharply to 84.54 mg/l, prompting the adjustment of antibiotic therapy from meropenem alone to meropenem combined with linezolid. However, no clinical improvement was observed. A few days later, the CRP level had increased further to 156.38 mg/l, accompanied by a marked decrease in the platelet count to 57x109/l, which was not present during the previous clinical course. The patient appeared pale and lethargic, raising concerns regarding a new infectious source or a possible disseminated infection. Given the repeated negative or inconsistent blood and sputum culture results and unclear etiology of the infection, a rare or difficult-to-culture pathogen was suspected. Following consultation with a multidisciplinary team, mNGS analysis of blood samples was performed.

In March 2025, mNGS analysis of a blood sample detected 148 sequencing reads corresponding to M. furfur with a relative abundance of 72.6% (Fig. 1). The total number of bp in the M. furfur reference genome was 8,311,773 and the total length of the detected M. furfur sequences was 10,901 bp, corresponding to a genome coverage of 0.1312% and an average sequencing depth of 1.001x. Because M. furfur is a constituent of the normal skin microbiota in humans and other warm-blooded animals and may colonize from the neonatal period onward, potential skin- or background-derived contamination was carefully evaluated. Importantly, M. furfur was not detected in corresponding NTCs processed using the same sequencing batch. Therefore, the M. furfur signal in the blood samples fulfilled the predefined sample-to-NTC reporting criteria and was not attributable to background NTC contamination.

mNGS detection of Malassezia
furfur in the blood sample. (A) mNGS results showing detection
of Malassezia at the genus level and M. furfur at the
species level. (B) Distribution of reads mapped to the M.
furfur reference genome.

Figure 1

mNGS detection of Malassezia furfur in the blood sample. (A) mNGS results showing detection of Malassezia at the genus level and M. furfur at the species level. (B) Distribution of reads mapped to the M. furfur reference genome.

The mNGS results were further interpreted in the context of the patient's clinical course. The patient had multiple risk factors for invasive Malassezia infection, including extreme prematurity, extremely low birth weight, prolonged NICU hospitalization, broad-spectrum antimicrobial exposure, lipid exposure and catheter-related risks. At the time of mNGS testing, the patient exhibited clinical deterioration with fever, generalized hyporesponsiveness, abdominal distension, intermittent hypoxia, markedly elevated CRP levels and thrombocytopenia, whereas conventional cultures were negative or inconsistent. These laboratory and clinical findings supported true bloodstream infection rather than incidental skin contamination during blood collection.

After the mNGS results were obtained, empirical antibacterial therapy was discontinued and targeted antifungal treatment with fluconazole along with platelet transfusion support was initiated. Notably, no viable isolate was obtained because additional lipid-supplemented fungal culture using Dixon's or Sabouraud agar with an olive oil overlay was not performed after a positive mNGS result. Cerebrospinal fluid fungal culture was negative, and biochemical analysis revealed no abnormalities. No evidence of disseminated fungal infection was present. By day 6 of fluconazole therapy, CRP levels normalized, body temperature stabilized, mental responsiveness improved, signs of pulmonary infection resolved, feeding tolerance increased and the platelet count gradually returned to normal (Fig. 2). The patient was subsequently managed with low-flow oxygen support and the patient's overall condition stabilized. The key treatment schedule for neonates is shown in Fig. 3.

Dynamic changes in laboratory
indicators during hospitalization. Serial changes in WBC, CRP, PLT
and HB are shown during the clinical course. WBC, white blood cell;
CRP, C-reactive protein; PLT, platelet; HB, hemoglobin; mNGS,
metagenomic next-generation sequencing.

Figure 2

Dynamic changes in laboratory indicators during hospitalization. Serial changes in WBC, CRP, PLT and HB are shown during the clinical course. WBC, white blood cell; CRP, C-reactive protein; PLT, platelet; HB, hemoglobin; mNGS, metagenomic next-generation sequencing.

Timeline of the diagnostic and
therapeutic course of the neonate. The timeline summarizes the
major clinical events, microbiological findings and treatment
adjustments from birth to discharge. CRP, C-reactive protein; mNGS,
metagenomic next-generation sequencing; NIPPV, nasal intermittent
positive pressure ventilation.

Figure 3

Timeline of the diagnostic and therapeutic course of the neonate. The timeline summarizes the major clinical events, microbiological findings and treatment adjustments from birth to discharge. CRP, C-reactive protein; mNGS, metagenomic next-generation sequencing; NIPPV, nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation.

Literature review results

Initially, the present case report identified 43 relevant articles through a systematic literature search. Based on the inclusion criteria, 28 articles were ultimately included for a detailed analysis of the clinical characteristics (excluding 14 that did not provide specific case details and 1 that did not involve a newborn) and 35 articles for the analysis of risk factors (excluding 8 that did not mention infection-related risk factors). Between 1981 and 2025, 250 cases of M. furfur bloodstream infections in infants were reported globally. The present case report systematically summarized the reported neonatal cases of M. furfur infections (Table I) (22-49), reviewed the principal laboratory diagnostic methods and conducted a comparative analysis of their technical characteristics and clinical applicability (Table II) (12,50-65). In addition, the distribution of different categories of risk factors associated with bloodstream infection is illustrated using brick-shaped bar charts in Fig. 4. Furthermore, publications addressing risk factors related to M. furfur bloodstream infections are systematically summarized and organized in Table III (22-40,42-44,46-51,53,66-71).

Distribution of risk factors
associated with neonatal bloodstream infection caused by
Malassezia furfur. Brick-shaped bar charts showing the
distribution of risk factors reported in the literature. NICU,
neonatal intensive care unit; ICU, intensive care unit.

Figure 4

Distribution of risk factors associated with neonatal bloodstream infection caused by Malassezia furfur. Brick-shaped bar charts showing the distribution of risk factors reported in the literature. NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; ICU, intensive care unit.

Table I

A systematic review of 251 reported cases of M. furfur infection: Demographics, initial presentation, therapy and outcome.

Table I

A systematic review of 251 reported cases of M. furfur infection: Demographics, initial presentation, therapy and outcome.

Author/s, yearNo. casesNeonatal ClassificationSexBirth weight (g)GA (weeks)SymptomProgression of diseaseSupporting therapyAntifungal therapyOutcome(Refs.)
Redline and Dahms, 19811PretermF74028 Respiratory-distress syndromeCardiomegaly, edema and cholestasisIntralipidAMB and flucytosineDeceased(22)
Powell et al, 19845Preterm (n=4), Term (n=1)2 M, 3 FN/A27-40Apnea and bradycardia, low-grade fever, interstitial pneumonia, elevated neutrophil band counts and thrombocytopeniaCatheter-related bloodstream infectionIntralipidN/AAll survived(23)
Long and Keyserling, 19854N/AN/AN/AN/AFever, apnea and bradycardia and thrombocytopeniaN/AIntralipidAMBN/A(24)
Dankner et al, 19875Preterm (n=4), Term (n=1)4 M, 1 F640-3,34525-38Thrombocytopenic, fungemia, necrotizing enterocolitis, apnea and bradycardiaPulmonary vasculitis and splenomegalyIntralipidAMBAll survived(25)
Alpert et al, 19877Preterm (n=5), Term (n=2)N/A670-3,40025-40Respiratory distress, apnea, bradycardia and thrombocytopeniaPersistent fungemiaN/AAMB (n=2) and 5-fluorocytocine (n=1)Survived (n=5), deceased (n=2)(26)
Aschner et al, 198719N/AN/AN/AN/AApnea, bradycardia, pulmonary deterioration and thrombocytopeniaCatheter colonization and fungemiaN/AN/AN/A(27)
Azimi et al, 198812PretermN/A580-1,500 (n=11), 3,000 (n=1)N/ABradycardia, fever, respiratory distress and signs of necrotizing enterocolitisCatheter occlusion, sepsis and fungemiaIntralipidN/AAll survived(28)
Larocco et al, 19888Preterm3 M, 5 F700-2,61025-34Fever, apnea, bradycardia, temperature instability, hepato-splenomegaly and gastrointestinal bleedingN/AIntralipid (n=7)N/ASurvived (n=6), deceased (n=2)(29)
Mickelsen et al, 19883PretermN/A700-96025-27Thrombocyto penia, leukocytosis and elevated band-cell countsFungemiaIntralipidAMBAll survived(30)
Surmont et al, 19896Preterm4 M, 2 F900-2,20028-33Fever, pulmonary infiltrates, leukocytosis, thrombocytopenia, apnea and bradycardiaFungaemia, cholestasis and BPDIntralipidMiconazole (n=5)Survived (n=5), deceased (n=1)(31)
Richet et al, 19893PretermN/A<1,00024-26Bronchopneumonia associated with respiratory failure, thrombocytopenia and leukocytosis.N/AIntralipidAMB (n=1)Survived (n=1), deceased (n=2)(32)
Hruszkewycz et al, 19913Extremely prematureN/A<1,500N/ABronchopulmonary dysplasiaN/AIntralipidAMBAll survived(33)
Ormälä et al, 199212PretermN/A<1,500<32N/AN/AN/AN/AAll survived(34)
Marcon and Powell, 199257Preterm majorityN/AN/AN/AFever, apnea, bradycardia and thrombocytopeniaSepsis and catheter infectionsIntralipidAMB (primary)Mortality ~10%(35)
Welbel et al, 19945Preterm2 M, 3 F690-1,47026-31Fever, apneaN/AIntralipidN/AAll survived(36)
Taylor et al, 19941N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A(37)
Sizun et al, 19942PretermN/A1,400, 2,50031, 40Fever, occasionally moderate; a worsening respiratory condition; apnea; and bradycardiaN/AIntralipidN/ASurvived (n=1), deceased (n=1)(38)
Shattuck et al, 199626PretermN/A<1,500<30FungemiaRare progression to sepsisN/AAMB (n=2)deceased (n=1)(39)
Chang et al, 199815Preterm9 M, 6 F<1,30024-31N/AN/AIntralipidAMB (n=10)Survived (n=14), deceased (n=1)(40)
Niamba et al, 199810N/A4 M, 6 FN/AN/AErythematous papules and pustules on the face and scalp (non-comedonal lesions resembling neonatal acne)Lesions appeared on 3–21 days of life, with a self-limiting course and resolution within 1–2 weeksN/ATopical ketoconazole 2% used in 4 cases (others received no treatment)All survived(41)
Chryssanthou et al, 20018PretermN/A660-1,10023-27Fever and apnea IntralipidAMB, flucytosine and fluconazoleAll survived(42)
Tirodker et al, 20034PretermN/AN/AN/AFeverSepsisN/AN/AN/A(43)
Rosales et al, 20041PretermMale56723FeverMeningitisIntralipidAMBDeceased(44)
McCoy et al, 20111PretermN/A2,25036Fever and apneaSepsisIntralipidAMBSurvived(45)
Iatta et al, 20146Infant5 M, 1 F£1,000g-1,500gN/ASevere birth asphyxia, premature birth, esophageal atresia, tetralogy of FallotFungemiaTotal lipid parenteral nutritionL-AMB and FLZAll survived(46)
Cornu et al, 20182Preterm1 M, 1 F1,46029.5CandidemiaN/AIntralipidFLZAll survived(66)
Chen et al, 202020Preterm11 M, 9 F660-1,42024-31Apnea, bradycardia and thrombocytopeniaFungemiaIntralipidProphylactic FLZ and AMBAll survived(47)
Huang et al, 20204Preterm2 M, 2 F490-81023-26PPROM, RDS, PDA, IVH, pulmonary HTN, intestinal obstruction, congenital pneumonia, BPD, pulmonary hemorrhageN/AParenteral lipid supplements, TPN, intubation and mechanical ventilationProphylactic FLZ, L-AmB and AmB-dAll survived(48)

[i] AMB, amphotericin B; BPD, bronchopulmonary dyplasia; HTN, hypertension; PPROM, preterm premature rupture of membrane; RDS, respiratory distress syndrome; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus; IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage; TPN, total parenteral nutrition; M, male; F, female; N/A, not applicable; FLZ, fluconazole.

Table II

Methods for Malassezia detection in clinical samples.

Table II

Methods for Malassezia detection in clinical samples.

CategoryMethodAdvantagesLimitationsChallenges(Refs.)
Culture-based methodsLipid-enriched media (forexample, modified Dixon and Leeming-Notman) • Incubation at 32-37˚C in a humid environment for 7-10 days (slow-growing species such as Malassezia sympodialis may require extended culture) • Morphological identification: creamy to pale-yellow colonies, smooth or wrinkled surface and yeast-like cells under microscopy • Biochemical tests: Tween 80 hydrolysis and urease assay• Gold standard for species differentiation and obtaining pure isolates for downstream analysis • Enables antifungal susceptibility testing to guide clinical therapy • Morphological observations complement identification through colony and cellular features• Time-consuming (2-4 weeks), delaying diagnosis and treatment • Stringent lipid requirements may result in missed detections on routine media • Risk of false negatives from improper sampling or transport • Limited resolution for closely related species without molecular confirmation• High species diversity (>14 known species) challenges discrimination of near-relatives • Risk of environmental contamination and aerosol spread in open culture • Competition from rapid molecular and proteomic methods, despite foundational role of culture(49-52)
Microscopic examination• 10% potassium hydroxide preparation to dissolve keratin and reveal yeast forms and pseudohyphae • Gram stain: Gram-positive oval or spherical cells • Giemsa or lactophenol cotton blue staining for enhanced contrast • Examination at 400x to 1000x magnification to identify 3-8 µm yeasts and budding structures• Rapid and simple with minimal steps, suitable for point-of-care • Low-cost, requiring no specialized equipment • Results available within 30 min, ideal for preliminary screening• Low sensitivity when fungal burden is low, leading to potential under-detection • Cannot differentiate between Malassezia species • Operator-dependent, with subjective interpretation and potential variability• Variable sample quality can cause false negatives • Interference from co-existing microbes (bacteria or fungi) • Lack of standardized staining and interpretation protocols(12,50,53,54)
Molecular methods• Internal transcribed spacer 1/2 region sequencing for species identification via sequence alignment • 26S rDNA D1/D2 region analysis (for example, RFLP) for interspecies discrimination • Multiplex PCR targeting species-specific genes (for example, β-tubulin, CYP51) for rapid detection• High resolution distinguishes closely related species that culture cannot separate • Rapid turnaround by extracting DNA directly from clinical samples, bypassing culture delays • Potential for global standardization through sequence databases• Higher cost for sequencing and primer synthesis compared with that of morphological methods • Requires specialized equipment and bioinformatics expertise, limiting use in resource-poor settings • False negatives owing to low DNA yield or sample degradation • Intraspecies genetic variability necessitates multilocus analysis • Public database inaccuracies and incompleteness can affect identifications • PCR inhibitors (for example, keratin) in clinical samples may impede amplification• Establishing robust reference databases for all Malassezia spp. remains ongoing • Ensuring quality control and avoidance of contamination in molecular workflows(55-60)
Mass spectrometry (matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry)• Protein extraction from colonies or clinical specimens using formic acid/acetonitrile • Spotting extracts onto a target plate with matrix (for example, α-cyano-4-hydro-xycinnamic acid) • Laser ionization generates PMFs matched against reference spectra• Rapid results within min, far faster than culture or biochemical assays • High specificity allowing species-level discrimination based on unique PMFs • Automated analysis reduces human error and is amenable to high-throughput screening• Dependent on comprehensive and up-to-date spectral databases; missing entries can lead to misidentification • Sample preparation protocols must be strictly standardized for reproducible results • High initial investment and maintenance costs may limit adoption in smaller laboratories • Limited discrimination of intraspecies variants without supplementary methods • Potential interference from host proteins or lipids in complex clinical samples• Continuous database expansion required to include newly described species • Integration with clinical workflows demands validation and quality assurance measures(35,61-64,71)

[i] RFLP, restriction fragment length polymorphism; PMF, peptide mass fingerprints; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

Table III

Risk factors associated with bloodstream infections caused by M. furfur

Table III

Risk factors associated with bloodstream infections caused by M. furfur

Specific risk factor (Refs.)
Host-related factorsExtremely low birth weight (<1,000 g)(22,25,26,28,30-35,42,44,46-48,65,66)
 Prematurity (<32 week gestation)(22,23,25-27,30-35,38,39,42,44,46,65-67)
 Immature immune system(22,23,25-28,35,38,42,43,46,48,50,51,65,66)
 Malnutrition(22,25,30,35,47,48)
 Impaired skin and mucosal barriers(23,25,28,46,48,65,66)
Iatrogenic/device-related factorsProlonged use of central venous catheter(22,23,25-33,35-40,42-44,46-48,50-52,65-70)
 Intravenous lipid emulsion infusion(22,33,35,38-40,42,44,46-48,51,52,67-70)
 Dependence on total parenteral nutrition(22,24-33,35,37,39,40,42-44,46-48,51,65,69)
 Prolonged NICU or ICU stay(22-34,36,40,44,46-48,50,51,65-67)
 Mechanical ventilation(22,25,27,28,30,32,34,39,42,48,65,66,69)
 Prolonged or broad-spectrum antibiotic exposure(22,25,27-37,39,42,43,47,48,65,66,71)
Microbial-related factorsLipid-dependence of Malassezia pachydermatis(23-27,29-35,46-48,51,67-70)
 Ability to form biofilms on catheter surfaces(38,46,48,69,71)
 Difficult to detect using conventional culture methods(22-29,31-36,38,46,50,66,69,71)
Diagnostic and treatment delaysDelayed recognition of fungal infection(22-29,31,32,35,46,48,50)
 Ineffective empirical antibiotic therapy(22,25,27-33,35,47,48,66)
 Delay in initiating antifungal therapy(22,23,25-29,32,35,66)

[i] ICU, intensive care unit; NICU, neonatal ICU.

Discussion

M. furfur is a lipophilic yeast commonly residing on human skin, especially in sebum-rich regions such as the scalp, face and upper torso (72). It exhibits strict requirements for exogenous fatty acids owing to the absence of the acyl-CoA synthase genes necessary for endogenous long-chain fatty acid biosynthesis (73,74). Although M. furfur is typically commensal and contributes to skin microbiota homeostasis, it can undergo pathogenic transformations under certain conditions.

The transition of M. furfur from a benign skin commensal to opportunistic pathogen involves a multifactorial interplay between host immunity, skin and gut barrier integrity, microbial dysbiosis and nutrient-rich external environments (72). In extremely preterm infants, underdeveloped skin, immature immune systems, frequent antibiotic administration and invasive procedures such as CVC insertion are the key drivers of pathogenic conversion. Both the present case report and a previous report underscore these risk factors (8,75). In particular, CVCs serve as entry points for M. furfur into the bloodstream and are recognized as risk factors for catheter-associated Malassezia fungemia (31).

M. furfur should not be regarded solely as a commensal skin infection in the NICU setting. Despite being a part of the normal human skin microbiota, M. furfur is currently recognized worldwide as an opportunistic fungal pathogen in the NICU, particularly among preterm and extremely low birth-weight infants exposed to lipid-containing parenteral nutrition, prolonged CVC placement, broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy or prolonged hospitalization (75,76). In this high-risk population, M. furfur may cause catheter-related fungemia, persistent bloodstream infections, pulmonary involvement, thrombocytopenia and sepsis-like clinical deterioration. Clinical manifestations are often subtle and non-specific and include temperature instability, respiratory distress, feeding intolerance, apnea, bradycardia, poor peripheral perfusion, lethargy and reduced responsiveness. Laboratory findings may include leukocytosis, elevated CRP levels and thrombocytopenia (8). Because these features overlap with those of Gram-negative bacterial sepsis or other invasive fungal infections, missed or delayed diagnoses remain common. Thus, M. furfur should be actively considered as a differential diagnosis in neonatal bloodstream infections, particularly when routine blood cultures are negative and risk factors such as lipid parenteral nutrition or prolonged catheter use are present.

For the patient of the present case report, M. furfur was confirmed as the causative pathogen using mNGS, highlighting the limitations of currently available conventional microbiological diagnostic methods for neonatal infections.

Although conventional culture remains essential for obtaining viable isolates and performing antifungal susceptibility testing, the capacity to recover M. furfur from clinical specimens is limited (77). Because M. furfur is a lipid-dependent yeast, routine blood culture systems and standard fungal media may fail to support its growth unless appropriate lipid supplementation is provided (50). Lipid-enriched media, such as Dixon's or Sabouraud dextrose agar supplemented with olive oil or long-chain fatty acids, can improve recovery and allow for downstream phenotypic testing. However, culture sensitivity is limited by strict lipid requirements, slow growth and the possibility of overgrowth by faster-growing microorganisms. These limitations contribute to false-negative conventional culture results and the delayed recognition of bloodstream Malassezia infections (53,78).

Microscopic techniques, such as potassium hydroxide preparation combined with India ink staining or Gram staining, offer rapid and convenient diagnostic options. However, their sensitivity is limited, particularly for the detection of organisms in sterile body fluids. These methods cannot provide species-level identification and rely heavily on the skills and experience of laboratory personnel (53).

The (1→3)-β-D-glucan (BDG) assay is commonly employed to evaluate systemic fungal infections (79). However, because the cell wall of M. furfur contains little to no β-D-glucan, BDG testing in such infections frequently yields false-negative results. Therefore, BDG assays should not be solely used to exclude the diagnosis of Malassezia-associated infections (80).

Conventional PCR and reverse-transcription-quantitative PCR exhibit high sensitivity and specificity and can directly detect pathogen DNA or RNA in clinical samples. Nonetheless, these approaches require optimized PCR primer design and specialized technical platforms and currently lack widely available commercial assays or standardized operating procedures (53,56).

Although matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry theoretically enables rapid and accurate species-level identification, its clinical application for Malassezia species remains limited. Challenges include difficulties in protein extraction from lipid-rich yeasts and inadequate coverage of Malassezia sequences in current databases, preventing their widespread adoption in routine diagnostics (53,61).

As a rapidly advancing untargeted detection technology, mNGS is particularly advantageous for identifying pathogens in difficult, low-abundance infections (81). In the present study, mNGS achieved etiological confirmation when traditional methods failed to yield positive results. However, mNGS application faces several challenges, including its high cost, the need for specialized personnel to interpret the results and incomplete representation of Malassezia sequences in current databases, which increases the risk of misinterpretation due to background contamination.

The present case represents the first neonate with bloodstream infection caused by M. furfur in mainland China identified using mNGS. One culture-confirmed case of neonatal M. furfur fungemia has previously been reported in Taiwan, China (47). The present case differs from the adult pulmonary case reported by Zhang et al (76) in terms of host background, infection site and diagnostic metho. The study by Zhang et al (76) showed that M. furfur infection mainly occurred in preterm infants and immunocompromised adults, that fungemia was the most common clinical form, and that invasive procedures and total parenteral nutrition were the main risk factors. Adult infection is commonly associated with acquired immunosuppression, transplantation, hematological disease or severe gastrointestinal disease, whereas neonatal infection is mainly driven by extreme prematurity, extremely low birth weight, immature skin and mucosal barriers, prolonged NICU hospitalization, central venous catheterization, broad-spectrum antimicrobial exposure and lipid-containing parenteral nutrition. In addition, neonatal manifestations are usually non-specific and may resemble bacterial sepsis, while routine culture may fail to detect M. furfur because of its lipid-dependent growth requirements. The clinical significance of the present case lies in the timely identification of M. furfur in an extremely preterm neonate with sepsis-like deterioration, multiple predisposing factors and negative or inconsistent conventional microbiological findings. This case highlights the value of mNGS in detecting rare lipid-dependent fungal pathogens that may be missed in routine cultures.

Through an in-depth analysis of the present case, combined with a retrospective review of the literature, the present case report summarized all known risk factors associated with M. furfur bloodstream infection in neonates. These include extremely low birth weight (<1,500 g), extreme prematurity (gestational age <28 weeks), immature immune function, CVC placement, prolonged parenteral nutrition containing lipid emulsions, exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics and compromised skin and intestinal mucosal barrier integrity. These risk factors are prevalent among patients in NICUs, creating a favorable clinical environment for the transition of M. furfur from a commensal organism to a pathogen (76).

Notably, the patient of the present case report exhibited nearly all of the aforementioned high-risk factors as well as typical clinical characteristics, including persistently negative blood cultures, difficulty in localizing the source of infection and lack of response to conventional antibiotic therapy. When facing diagnostic challenges, mNGS enabled rapid and definitive identification of M. furfur, elucidated the causative agent and directly guided antifungal treatment strategies. As a result, the patient's clinical symptoms improved rapidly, culminating in a successful recovery and hospital discharge, thereby affirming the importance of early pathogen identification and timely intervention for improving clinical outcomes.

This case highlights that although invasive M. furfur infections remain under-recognized in routine clinical practice, their pathogenic potential in high-risk NICU patients should not be underestimated. The present case report suggests that clinical infection guidelines should consider including M. furfur in the spectrum of potential pathogens, particularly in cases of neonatal sepsis characterized by negative blood cultures. This inclusion can help achieve a more comprehensive diagnostic framework. Furthermore, the present study reinforces the core principles of the early detection, diagnosis and treatment of neonatal infections. Proactive assessment of infection-related risk factors, coupled with the timely application of advanced diagnostic techniques, such as mNGS, can help overcome the limitations of conventional methods and significantly enhance diagnostic efficiency and precision.

At present, no standardized treatment guidelines specifically targeting M. furfur bloodstream infections are available. Management generally follows the principles established for invasive fungal diseases and is individualized based on the antifungal susceptibility profiles and clinical status of the neonate. Commonly employed antifungal agents include amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole and fluconazole. Amphotericin B demonstrates sensitivity against the majority of Malassezia species but carries a high risk of toxicity, particularly nephrotoxicity, necessitating cautious use (82). Itraconazole and voriconazole exhibit good in vitro activity against M. furfur, although clinical experience with their use in neonates remains limited (51). Fluconazole has been effective in certain cases, although some studies report lower susceptibility of Malassezia species to fluconazole. Given its favorable safety profile, stable plasma concentration and relatively low side effect burden, fluconazole is more commonly used in neonatal populations (47).

In the present case, the patient, an extremely preterm infant with multiple infection-related risk factors, was promptly managed upon diagnosis by discontinuing lipid emulsion support and initiating antifungal therapy with fluconazole. Despite reported variability in M. furfur susceptibility to fluconazole, clinical decision-making in this case was guided by the limited extent of infection, absence of deep organ involvement and preserved hepatic and renal function (47). Fluconazole was selected as the initial treatment owing to its safety and controllability. Following treatment initiation, the patient's body temperature normalized, inflammatory markers decreased, no recurrence of infection was observed and the patient was successfully discharged. This outcome indicates that under specific clinical circumstances, fluconazole may be a viable therapeutic option for neonatal M. furfur bloodstream infections.

As a lipophilic yeast, M. furfur lacks the ability to synthesize long-chain fatty acids and relies entirely on exogenous lipid sources for growth. In the context of parenteral nutrition, especially when lipid emulsions are used, the organism can colonize catheter surfaces and extensively proliferate, thereby leading to fungemia. Therefore, immediate discontinuation of lipid emulsions upon diagnosis or strong suspicion of M. furfur infection is key for halting ongoing pathogen expansion and controlling infection progression. Combining antifungal therapy with cessation of lipid supplementation has been reported to significantly shorten the disease course and improve clinical outcomes (8).

With rapid advancements in mNGS, its application in the diagnosis of infectious diseases has become increasingly widespread. The core advantages of mNGS include its high sensitivity. mNGS can detect extremely low-abundance microbial DNA or RNA, providing supplementary diagnostic yield in scenarios where traditional methods exhibit low detection rates. Unlike targeted PCR or culture-based methods, the broad detection spectrum of mNGS does not rely on predefined pathogenic hypotheses. Instead, it enables unbiased and comprehensive screening of all potential pathogens within a sample. An important utility of this method is the rapid identification of novel or rare pathogens in clinical situations where conventional diagnostic techniques are limited. In such cases, mNGS facilitates the discovery of rare, fastidious or even novel pathogens, thereby providing key information for guiding clinical decision-making (16,83).

Despite these advantages, some limitations of mNGS must not be overlooked. Currently, the cost of mNGS is substantially higher when compared with that of traditional culture or PCR methods, restricting its widespread adoption in frontline clinical practice. Owing to factors such as sample handling, reagent impurities and environmental microbial DNA contamination, mNGS may detect non-pathogenic microorganisms, complicating data interpretation. Additionally, interpretation of mNGS results requires integration of sequencing read counts, relative microbial abundance and clinical context. It demands sophisticated bioinformatic platforms and highly trained personnel for accurate analysis. Furthermore, owing to the lack of antimicrobial susceptibility information as provided by culture-based methods, mNGS cannot directly provide antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, necessitating either additional testing or empiric therapeutic decision-making (17,84). In the present case report, additional lipid-supplemented fungal cultures using Dixon's or Sabouraud agar with an olive oil overlay were not performed after a positive mNGS result and no viable M. furfur isolate was available for phenotypic antifungal susceptibility testing. This represents a limitation of the present case, although the patient displayed favorable clinical and laboratory responses after fluconazole therapy. The mNGS results should not be interpreted in isolation, particularly for M. furfur, a common skin-associated commensal organism that may theoretically be introduced during blood collection or sample processing. Nonetheless, in this case, M. furfur was not detected in the corresponding NTC, whereas the blood sample yielded 148 reads assigned to M. furfur with a relative abundance of 72.6%, arguing against NTC-related background contamination. Moreover, the patient had multiple risk factors for invasive Malassezia infection, including extreme prematurity, extremely low birth weight, prolonged NICU hospitalization, broad-spectrum antimicrobial exposure, lipid exposure and catheter-related risks. The clinical course was also consistent with bloodstream infection, including fever, clinical deterioration, markedly elevated CRP levels, thrombocytopenia, negative or inconsistent conventional cultures and subsequent improvement after antifungal therapy. Collectively, these findings support a true bloodstream infection rather than incidental skin contamination or overinterpretation of the isolated mNGS results. Therefore, mNGS results must not be interpreted in isolation during clinical practice. Comprehensive evaluation combining patient clinical presentations, laboratory findings, imaging studies and results from conventional microbiological tests is essential. For any detected pathogen, a scientific judgment must be made based on infection site, host immune status, sequencing abundance and pathogenic relevance to avoid misdiagnosis, missed diagnosis or overtreatment.

In the present case report, by integrating mNGS findings within the clinical context, M. furfur was successfully identified as the causative pathogen. Targeted antifungal therapy was subsequently implemented, leading to a favorable clinical outcome. This case demonstrates the value of adopting mNGS technology in the management of complex infections in neonates.

The present case report describes the case of a neonatal bloodstream infection caused by M. furfur in mainland China that was identified directly from blood samples utilizing mNGS. Through a systematic review of the literature, the epidemiological characteristics, clinical manifestations, outcomes, predisposing factors and diagnostic approaches associated with neonatal M. furfur infection were summarized. Based on the diagnostic and therapeutic experience from this case, we propose that M. furfur should be considered in the differential diagnosis of neonatal sepsis, particularly among extremely low-birth-weight infants with persistent clinical suspicion of infection despite negative conventional microbiological tests. The application of mNGS may provide important diagnostic support in such cases, but its results should be interpreted in conjunction with overt clinical manifestations, conventional microbiology techniques and patient-specific risk factors.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: This work was supported by the Science and Technology Project of Jiangmen (grant nos. 2025YL01029 and 2022YL01014) and Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine (grant no. 2023B110008).

Availability of data and materials

The host-depleted mNGS sequencing data generated in the present study have been deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) at the National Genomics Data Center (NGDC), China National Center for Bioinformation (CNCB), under GSA accession number CRA044583. The data are publicly available at: https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA044583. The associated BioProject accession number is PRJCA066328, and the corresponding run accession numbers are CRR3191935 and CRR3191936. Human reads and any potentially identifiable information were removed prior to data submission to protect patient privacy. Other data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its figures and tables. Additional anonymized data are available from the corresponding author.

Authors' contributions

SG designed the present study. SG and LS confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. SG, LS and QF were responsible for data collection and case acquisition. SG, ZL and YL performed and analyzed all the experiments. SG, LS and KL conducted the literature review and analysis. HL made substantial contributions to the acquisition and interpretation of clinical data, including the evaluation of information. KL contributed to the methodological aspects of the study including technical support, interpretation of sequencing results and analysis of data. PK contributed to the conception and design of the study, methodological guidance, interpretation of findings and revision of the manuscript. SG and PK revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Jiangmen Central Hospital [approval no. (2025)242 A]. This was an observational study involving retrospective analysis of anonymized clinical and laboratory data generated during routine medical care. No additional intervention, sampling or follow-up was performed. Given the retrospective study design and the use of anonymized data, the Ethics Committee waived the requirement for informed consent to participate. All patient-related information was anonymized before analysis and publication.

Patient consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication of the clinical details and accompanying images was obtained from the legal guardian of the patient. All patient-related information was anonymized before publication, and no directly identifiable personal data are presented.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Ashbee HR and Evans EG: Immunology of diseases associated with Malassezia species. Clin Microbiol Rev. 15:21–57. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Gaitanis G, Magiatis P, Hantschke M, Bassukas ID and Velegraki A: The Malassezia genus in skin and systemic diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 25:106–141. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Celis Ramirez AM, Amezquita A, Cardona Jaramillo JEC, Matiz-Cerón LF, Andrade-Martínez JS, Triana S, Mantilla MJ, Restrepo S, Barrios AFG and de Cock H: Analysis of malassezia lipidome disclosed differences among the species and reveals presence of unusual yeast lipids. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 10(338)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Theelen B, Cafarchia C, Gaitanis G, Bassukas ID, Boekhout T and Dawson TL Jr: Malassezia ecology, pathophysiology, and treatment. Med Mycol. 56 (Suppl_1):S10–S25. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Redline RW, Redline SS, Boxerbaum B and Dahms BB: Systemic Malassezia furfur infections in patients receiving intralipid therapy. Hum Pathol. 16:815–822. 1985.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Devlin RK: Invasive fungal infections caused by Candida and Malassezia species in the neonatal intensive care unit. Adv Neonatal Care. 6:68–79. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Sparber F and LeibundGut-Landmann S: Host responses to Malassezia spp. in the Mammalian Skin. Front Immunol. 8(1614)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Mpakosi A, Cholevas V, Meletiadis J, Theodoraki M and Sokou R: Neonatal fungemia by Non-candida rare opportunistic yeasts: A systematic review of literature. Int J Mol Sci. 25(9266)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Priputnevich TV, Gordeev AB, Shabanova NE, Denisov P, Trofimov DY, Balashova EN, Donnikov AE, Yarotskaya EL, Zubkov VV and Sukhikh GT: The underestimated role of major skin commensal Malassezia furfur in the development of neonatal invasive fungal infections. Heliyon. 10(e38767)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Weiss SJ, Schoch PE and Cunha BA: Malassezia furfur fungemia associated with central venous catheter lipid emulsion infusion. Heart Lung. 20:87–90. 1991.PubMed/NCBI

11 

Ellepola AN and Morrison CJ: Laboratory diagnosis of invasive candidiasis. J Microbiol. 43:65–84. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

12 

Saunte DML, Gaitanis G and Hay RJ: Malassezia-associated skin diseases, the use of diagnostics and treatment. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 10(112)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Baltogianni M, Giapros V and Dermitzaki N: Recent challenges in diagnosis and treatment of invasive candidiasis in neonates. Children (Basel). 11(1207)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Azim A and Ahmed A: Diagnosis and management of invasive fungal diseases in non-neutropenic ICU patients, with focus on candidiasis and aspergillosis: A comprehensive review. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 14(1256158)2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Agudelo-Perez S, Fernandez-Sarmiento J, Rivera Leon D and Pelaez RG: Metagenomics by next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in the etiological characterization of neonatal and pediatric sepsis: A systematic review. Front Pediatr. 11(1011723)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Gu W, Miller S and Chiu CY: Clinical metagenomic Next-generation sequencing for pathogen detection. Annu Rev Pathol. 14:319–338. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Miller S, Naccache SN, Samayoa E, Messacar K, Arevalo S, Federman S, Stryke D, Pham E, Fung B, Bolosky WJ, et al: Laboratory validation of a clinical metagenomic sequencing assay for pathogen detection in cerebrospinal fluid. Genome Res. 29:831–842. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Chen L, Zhao Y, Wei J, Huang W, Ma Y, Yang X, Liu Y, Wang J, Xia H and Lou Z: Metagenomic Next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of neonatal infectious diseases. Microbiol Spectr. 10(e0119522)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Zhang R, Zhuang Y, Xiao ZH, Li CY, Zhang F, Huang WQ, Zhang M, Peng XM and Liu C: Diagnosis and surveillance of neonatal infections by metagenomic Next-generation sequencing. Front Microbiol. 13(855988)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Wilson MR, Sample HA, Zorn KC, Arevalo S, Yu G, Neuhaus J, Federman S, Stryke D, Briggs B, Langelier C, et al: Clinical metagenomic sequencing for diagnosis of meningitis and encephalitis. N Engl J Med. 380:2327–2340. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Jing C, Chen H, Liang Y, Wang Q, Li L, Sun S, Guo Y, Wang R, Jiang Z and Wang H: Clinical evaluation of an improved metagenomic Next-Generation sequencing test for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections. Clin Chem. 67:1133–1143. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Redline RW and Dahms BB: Malassezia pulmonary vasculitis in an infant on long-term Intralipid therapy. N Engl J Med. 305:1395–1398. 1981.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Powell DA, Aungst J, Snedden S, Hansen N and Brady M: Broviac catheter-related Malassezia furfur sepsis in five infants receiving intravenous fat emulsions. J Pediatr. 105:987–990. 1984.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Long JG and Keyserling HL: Catheter-related infection in infants due to an unusual lipophilic yeast- Malassezia furfur. Pediatrics. 76:896–900. 1985.PubMed/NCBI

25 

Dankner WM, Spector SA, Fierer J and Davis CE: Malassezia fungemia in neonates and adults: Complication of hyperalimentation. Rev Infect Dis. 9:743–753. 1987.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Alpert G, Bell LM and Campos JM: Malassezia furfur fungemia in infancy. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 26:528–531. 1987.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Aschner JL, Punsalang A Jr, Maniscalco WM and Menegus MA: Percutaneous central venous catheter colonization with Malassezia furfur: Incidence and clinical significance. Pediatrics. 80:535–539. 1987.PubMed/NCBI

28 

Azimi PH, Levernier K, Lefrak LM, Petru AM, Barrett T, Schenck H, Sandhu AS, Duritz G and Valesco M: Malassezia furfur: A cause of occlusion of percutaneous central venous catheters in infants in the intensive care nursery. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 7:100–103. 1988.PubMed/NCBI

29 

Larocco M, Dorenbaum A, Robinson A and Pickering LK: Recovery of Malassezia pachydermatis from eight infants in a neonatal intensive care nursery: Clinical and laboratory features. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 7:398–401. 1988.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Mickelsen PA, Viano-Paulson MC, Stevens DA and Diaz PS: Clinical and microbiological features of infection with Malassezia pachydermatis in high-risk infants. J Infect Dis. 157:1163–1168. 1988.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Surmont I, Gavilanes A, Vandepitte J, Devlieger H and Eggermont E: Malassezia furfur fungaemia in infants receiving intravenous lipid emulsions. A rarity or just underestimated? Eur J Pediatr. 148:435–438. 1989.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Richet HM, McNeil MM, Edwards MC and Jarvis WR: Cluster of Malassezia furfur pulmonary infections in infants in a neonatal intensive-care unit. J Clin Microbiol. 27:1197–1200. 1989.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Hruszkewycz V, Holtrop PC, Batton DG, Morden RS, Gibson P and Band JD: Complications associated with central venous catheters inserted in critically ill neonates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 12:544–548. 1991.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Ormälä T, Korppi M, Katila ML, Ojanen T and Heinonen K: Fungal gut colonization with Candida or Pityrosporum sp. and serum Candida antigen in preterm neonates with very low birth weights. Scand J Infect Dis. 24:781–785. 1992.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Marcon MJ and Powell DA: Human infections due to Malassezia spp. Clin Microbiol Rev. 5:101–119. 1992.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Welbel SF, McNeil MM, Pramanik A, Silberman R, Oberle AD, Midgley G, Crow S and Jarvis WR: Nosocomial Malassezia pachydermatis bloodstream infections in a neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 13:104–108. 1994.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Taylor GD, Buchanan-Chell M, Kirkland T, McKenzie M and Wiens R: Trends and sources of nosocomial fungaemia. Mycoses. 37:187–190. 1994.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Sizun J, Karangwa A, Giroux JD, Masure O, Simitzis AM, Alix D and De Parscau L: Malassezia furfur-related colonization and infection of central venous catheters. A prospective study in a pediatric intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 20:496–499. 1994.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Shattuck KE, Cochran CK, Zabransky RJ, Pasarell L, Davis JC and Malloy MH: Colonization and infection associated with Malassezia and Candida species in a neonatal unit. J Hosp Infect. 34:123–129. 1996.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Chang HJ, Miller HL, Watkins N, Arduino MJ, Ashford DA, Midgley G, Aguero SM, Pinto-Powell R, von Reyn CF, Edwards W, et al: An epidemic of Malassezia pachydermatis in an intensive care nursery associated with colonization of health care Workers' pet dogs. N Engl J Med. 338:706–711. 1998.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

41 

Niamba P, Weill FX, Sarlangue J, Labrèze C, Couprie B and Taïeh A: Is common neonatal cephalic pustulosis (neonatal acne) triggered by Malassezia sympodialis? Arch Dermatol. 134:995–998. 1998.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Chryssanthou E, Broberger U and Petrini B: Malassezia pachydermatis fungaemia in a neonatal intensive care unit. Acta Paediatr. 90:323–327. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

43 

Tirodker UH, Nataro JP, Smith S, LasCasas L and Fairchild KD: Detection of fungemia by polymerase chain reaction in critically ill neonates and children. J Perinatol. 23:117–122. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

44 

Rosales CM, Jackson MA and Zwick D: Malassezia furfur meningitis associated with total parenteral nutrition subdural effusion. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 7:86–90. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

45 

McCoy M, Bedwell S and Noori S: Exchange of peripherally inserted central catheters is associated with an increased risk for bloodstream infection. Am J Perinatol. 28:419–424. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

46 

Iatta R, Cafarchia C, Cuna T, Montagna O, Laforgia N, Gentile O, Rizzo A, Boekhout T, Otranto D and Montagna MT: Bloodstream infections by malassezia and candida species in critical care patients. Med Mycol. 52:264–269. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

47 

Chen IT, Chen CC, Huang HC and Kuo KC: Malassezia furfur emergence and candidemia trends in a neonatal intensive care unit during 10 years: The experience of fluconazole prophylaxis in a single hospital. Adv Neonatal Care. 20:E3–E8. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

48 

Huang CY, Peng CC, Hsu CH, Chang JH, Chiu NC and Chi H: Systemic infection caused by malassezia pachydermatis in infants: Case series and review of the literature. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 39:444–448. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

49 

Mayser P, Haze P, Papavassilis C, Pickel M, Gruender K and Gueho E: Differentiation of Malassezia species: Selectivity of cremophor EL, castor oil and ricinoleic acid for M. furfur. Br J Dermatol. 137:208–213. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

50 

Iatta R, Battista M, Miragliotta G, Boekhout T, Otranto D and Cafarchia C: Blood culture procedures and diagnosis of Malassezia furfur bloodstream infections: Strength and weakness. Med Mycol. 56:828–833. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

51 

Iatta R, Figueredo LA, Montagna MT, Otranto D and Cafarchia C: In vitro antifungal susceptibility of Malassezia furfur from bloodstream infections. J Med Microbiol. 63:1467–1473. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

52 

Nelson SC, Yau YC, Richardson SE and Matlow AG: Improved detection of Malassezia species in lipid-supplemented Peds Plus blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 33:1005–1007. 1995.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

53 

Prohic A, Jovovic Sadikovic T, Krupalija-Fazlic M and Kuskunovic-Vlahovljak S: Malassezia species in healthy skin and in dermatological conditions. Int J Dermatol. 55:494–504. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

54 

Sugita T, Takashima M, Shinoda T, Suto H, Unno T, Tsuboi R, Ogawa H and Nishikawa A: New yeast species, Malassezia dermatis, isolated from patients with atopic dermatitis. J Clin Microbiol. 40:1363–1367. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

55 

Sugita T, Takashima M, Kodama M, Tsuboi R and Nishikawa A: Description of a new yeast species, Malassezia japonica, and its detection in patients with atopic dermatitis and healthy subjects. J Clin Microbiol. 41:4695–4699. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

56 

Ilahi A, Hadrich I, Neji S, Trabelsi H, Makni F and Ayadi A: Real-time PCR identification of six malassezia species. Curr Microbiol. 74:671–677. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

57 

Gupta AK, Kohli Y and Summerbell RC: Molecular differentiation of seven Malassezia species. J Clin Microbiol. 38:1869–1875. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

58 

Gaitanis G, Velegraki A, Frangoulis E, Mitroussia A, Tsigonia A, Tzimogianni A, Katsambas A and Legakis NJ: Identification of Malassezia species from patient skin scales by PCR-RFLP. Clin Microbiol Infect. 8:162–173. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

59 

Kim JY, Hahn HJ, Choe YB, Lee YW, Ahn KJ and Moon KC: Molecular biological identification of malassezia yeasts using pyrosequencing. Ann Dermatol. 25:73–79. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

60 

Gholami M, Mokhtari F and Mohammadi R: Identification of malassezia species using direct PCR-sequencing on clinical samples from patients with pityriasis versicolor and seborrheic dermatitis. Curr Med Mycol. 6:21–26. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

61 

Honnavar P, Ghosh AK, Paul S, Shankarnarayan SA, Singh P, Dogra S, Chakrabarti A and Rudramurthy SM: Identification of malassezia species by MALDI-TOF MS after expansion of database. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 92:118–123. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

62 

Kolecka A, Khayhan K, Arabatzis M, Velegraki A, Kostrzewa M, Andersson A, Scheynius A, Cafarchia C, Iatta R, Montagna MT, et al: Efficient identification of Malassezia yeasts by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Br J Dermatol. 170:332–341. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

63 

Alanio A, Beretti JL, Dauphin B, Mellado E, Quesne G, Lacroix C, Amara A, Berche P, Nassif X and Bougnoux ME: Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry for fast and accurate identification of clinically relevant Aspergillus species. Clin Microbiol Infect. 17:750–755. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

64 

Bader O: MALDI-TOF-MS-based species identification and typing approaches in medical mycology. Proteomics. 13:788–799. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

65 

Chen IL, Chiu NC, Chi H, Hsu CH, Chang JH, Huang DT and Huang FY: Changing of bloodstream infections in a medical center neonatal intensive care unit. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 50:514–520. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

66 

Cornu M, Goudjil S, Kongolo G, Leke A, Poulain D, Chouaki T and Sendid B: Evaluation of the (1,3)-β-D-glucan assay for the diagnosis of neonatal invasive yeast infections. Med Mycol. 56:78–87. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

67 

Midgley G: The lipophilic yeasts: State of the art and prospects. Med Mycol. 38 (Suppl 1):S9–S16. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

68 

Brandt ME, Benjamin LE and Steinkraus GE: Pseudooutbreak of Candida versatilitis fungemia in a microbiology laboratory. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 46:73–75. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

69 

Oliveri S, Trovato L, Betta P, Romeo MG and Nicoletti G: Malassezia furfur fungaemia in a neonatal patient detected by lysis-centrifugation blood culture method: First case reported in Italy. Mycoses. 54:e638–640. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

70 

Campigotto A, Richardson SE, Sebert M, McElvania TeKippe E, Chakravarty A and Doern CD: Low Utility of pediatric isolator blood culture system for detection of fungemia in children: A 10-Year review. J Clin Microbiol. 54:2284–2287. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

71 

Pedrosa AF, Lisboa C and Rodrigues AG: Malassezia infections with systemic involvement: Figures and facts. J Dermatol. 45:1278–1282. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

72 

Vijaya Chandra SH, Srinivas R, Dawson TL Jr and Common JE: Cutaneous malassezia: Commensal, pathogen, or protector? Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 10(614446)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

73 

Celis Ramírez AM: Unraveling lipid metabolism in lipid-dependent pathogenic Malassezia yeasts. Universiteit Utrecht, 2017.

74 

Park M, Park S and Jung WH: Skin commensal fungus malassezia and its lipases. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 31:637–644. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

75 

Rhimi W, Theelen B, Boekhout T, Otranto D and Cafarchia C: Malassezia spp. Yeasts of emerging concern in fungemia. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 10(370)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

76 

Zhang X, Jin F, Ni F, Xu Y, Lu Y and Xia W: Clinical data analysis of 86 patients with invasive infections caused by Malassezia furfur from a tertiary medical center and 37 studies. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 13(1079535)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

77 

Washington University in St. Louis: Blood culture (LAB462), Disseminated Malassezia spp, 2023.

78 

Tetsuka N, Muramatsu H, Iguchi M, Oka K, Morioka H, Takahashi Y and Yagi T: Difficulties in diagnosing Malassezia furfur bloodstream infection and possibility of spontaneous resolution in a patient undergoing chemotherapy for neuroblastoma: A case report. J Infect Chemother. 28:987–990. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

79 

Singh S, Kaur H, Choudhary H, Sethi S, Malhotra P, Gupta KL, Rudramurthy SM and Chakrabarti A: Evaluation of biomarkers: Galactomannan and 1,3-beta-D-glucan assay for the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients from a tertiary care centre. Indian J Med Microbiol. 36:557–563. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

80 

Theel ES and Doern CD: β-D-glucan testing is important for diagnosis of invasive fungal infections. J Clin Microbiol. 51:3478–3483. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

81 

Jiang S, Chen Y, Han S, Lv L and Li L: Next-Generation sequencing applications for the study of fungal pathogens. Microorganisms. 10(1882)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

82 

Rhimi W, Chebil W, Ugochukwu ICI, Babba H, Otranto D and Cafarchia C: Comparison of virulence factors and susceptibility profiles of Malassezia furfur from pityriasis versicolor patients and bloodstream infections of preterm infants. Med Mycol. 61(myad003)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

83 

Chiu CY and Miller SA: Clinical metagenomics. Nat Rev Genet. 20:341–355. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

84 

Wilson MR, Naccache SN, Samayoa E, Biagtan M, Bashir H, Yu G, Salamat SM, Somasekar S, Federman S, Miller S, et al: Actionable diagnosis of neuroleptospirosis by next-generation sequencing. N Engl J Med. 370:2408–2417. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

  • Abstract
  • View
  • Download
  • Twitter
Copy and paste a formatted citation
Spandidos Publications style
Gao S, Song L, Feng Q, Li Y, Liang H, Lei K, Li Z and Kisembo P: First case of neonatal bloodstream infection caused by <em>Malassezia furfur</em> in mainland China diagnosed via metagenomic next‑generation sequencing: A case report. Exp Ther Med 32: 267, 2026.
APA
Gao, S., Song, L., Feng, Q., Li, Y., Liang, H., Lei, K. ... Kisembo, P. (2026). First case of neonatal bloodstream infection caused by <em>Malassezia furfur</em> in mainland China diagnosed via metagenomic next‑generation sequencing: A case report. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 32, 267. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2026.13262
MLA
Gao, S., Song, L., Feng, Q., Li, Y., Liang, H., Lei, K., Li, Z., Kisembo, P."First case of neonatal bloodstream infection caused by <em>Malassezia furfur</em> in mainland China diagnosed via metagenomic next‑generation sequencing: A case report". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 32.4 (2026): 267.
Chicago
Gao, S., Song, L., Feng, Q., Li, Y., Liang, H., Lei, K., Li, Z., Kisembo, P."First case of neonatal bloodstream infection caused by <em>Malassezia furfur</em> in mainland China diagnosed via metagenomic next‑generation sequencing: A case report". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 32, no. 4 (2026): 267. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2026.13262
Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Gao S, Song L, Feng Q, Li Y, Liang H, Lei K, Li Z and Kisembo P: First case of neonatal bloodstream infection caused by <em>Malassezia furfur</em> in mainland China diagnosed via metagenomic next‑generation sequencing: A case report. Exp Ther Med 32: 267, 2026.
APA
Gao, S., Song, L., Feng, Q., Li, Y., Liang, H., Lei, K. ... Kisembo, P. (2026). First case of neonatal bloodstream infection caused by <em>Malassezia furfur</em> in mainland China diagnosed via metagenomic next‑generation sequencing: A case report. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 32, 267. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2026.13262
MLA
Gao, S., Song, L., Feng, Q., Li, Y., Liang, H., Lei, K., Li, Z., Kisembo, P."First case of neonatal bloodstream infection caused by <em>Malassezia furfur</em> in mainland China diagnosed via metagenomic next‑generation sequencing: A case report". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 32.4 (2026): 267.
Chicago
Gao, S., Song, L., Feng, Q., Li, Y., Liang, H., Lei, K., Li, Z., Kisembo, P."First case of neonatal bloodstream infection caused by <em>Malassezia furfur</em> in mainland China diagnosed via metagenomic next‑generation sequencing: A case report". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 32, no. 4 (2026): 267. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2026.13262
Follow us
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
About
  • Spandidos Publications
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
How can we help?
  • Help
  • Live Chat
  • Contact
  • Email to our Support Team