Downregulation of hepatic lipase is associated with decreased CD133 expression and clone formation in HepG2 cells
- Authors:
- Published online on: July 4, 2018 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2018.3756
- Pages: 2137-2144
Abstract
Introduction
Liver cancer is one of the most prevalent types of cancer. Hepatoblastoma is a malignant liver cancer with a poor prognosis and is most commonly diagnosed in the first 3 years of life of children. Moreover, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide (1). This statistic is attributed to the fact that a large number of patients are diagnosed with HCC at an advance stage, which leads to a poor prognosis. For these patients, systemic chemotherapy is considered an alternative option. However, HCC is relatively chemotherapy-resistant and patients receiving chemotherapy still have an unsatisfactory prognosis and a high rate of recurrence (2). Some studies have demonstrated that HCC resistance to chemotherapy may be due to the presence of hepatic tumor-derived cells, which are commonly considered to be responsible for tumor initiation, self-renewal, metastasis and chemoresistance (3). Therefore, a greater understanding of the mechanisms of tumor chemore-sistance and potential molecular targets is urgently required.
Hepatic lipase (LIPC), a member of the lipase gene family, is a hydrolytic enzyme with lipolytic and ligand function and plays an important role in lipoprotein metabolism and cytokine homeostasis (4). LIPC has been reported to be closely associated with coronary artery disease and diabetes (5). Recent studies have demonstrated the effects of LIPC in cancer progression and metastasis. A previous study suggested that monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) promotes tumor cell proliferation, invasion and migration by regulating a fatty acid network with carcinogenesis signaling molecules (6). Another study by Ding et al reported that apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic polypeptide-like 3G (APOBEC3G), S100P, LIPC and CD133 played a critical role in promoting liver metastasis of colorectal cancer, and could be potential markers for predicting the likelihood of hepatic metastasis (7). More recently, another study indicated that the intratumoral level of LIPC positively correlated with the prognosis of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), and patients with relatively low expression of LIPC may benefit from chemotherapy (8). However, the precise role of LIPC in tumor development and chemotherapy remains unknown. CD133 has been commonly considered as a marker of tumor-derived cells in various tumors including liver cancer and colon cancer. It has been also found to be involved in chemoresistance (9,10). Ding et al demonstrated that both LIPC and CD133 promote the liver metastasis of colorectal cancer (7). However, no evidence has been provided as to whether they function interactively or independently in tumors.
In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of LIPC in cancer cells and to elucidate the potential underlying mechanisms. We demonstrate that the downregulation of LIPC expression significantly decreases cell proliferation and the colony formation rate of HepG2 cells. The expression of CD133 significantly decreased in short hairpin RNA (shLIPC)-transfected HepG2 cells compared with control short hairpin RNA (shCON)-transfected HepG2 cells. The knockdown of LIPC increased resistance to doxorubicin and 5-floxuridine (5-FU). Microarray analysis of gene expression profiles in the shCON/shLIPC-transfected HepG2 cells identified differentially expressed genes for further analysis.
Materials and methods
Cell lines, cell culture and reagents
All cells [human colorectal cancer cells SW620 (CCL-227), SW480 (CCL-228), LoVo (CCL-229), LS174T (CL-188), HCT 116 (CCL-247), HT29 (HTB-38), hepatoblastoma cells HepG2 (HB-8065), and mouse colorectal cancer cells CT26 (CRL-2638)] were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). The cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). The cells were maintained at 37°C under 5% CO2. Doxorubicin and 5-FU were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (all from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA) and stored as 10 mmol/l stock solutions in the dark at −20°C.
LIPC activity assay
The cell culture supernatants were collected and the activity of LIPC was measured using a human hepatic triglyceride lipase (HTGL) enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Cusabio, Wuhan, China) according to the manufacturer’ s instructions.
RNA extraction and RT-qPCR
Total RNA was extracted from the cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and First Strand cDNA synthesis was performed with a PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit (DRR037A; Takara, Shiga, Japan). qPCR was performed using SYBR-Green Premix Ex Taq (RR091A; Takara) and analyzed with the LC480 system (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Specific primer sequences were designed using NCBI primerblast for: LIPC, 5′-TCC CAA AGT ACC CAA AGG C-3′ (sense) and 5′-ACT CCA GCC TTG ACC CAC TC-3′ (antisense); glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), 5′-TGG AAG GAC TCA TGA CCA CA-3′ (sense) and 5′-TTC AGC TCA GGG ATG ACC TT-3′ (anti-sense). The qPCR conditions were 95°C for 5 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 10 sec, 58°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 20 sec. A final extension at 72°C for 5 min was included before a temperature ramp from 72 to 95°C at 0.1°C/sec. GAPDH was used as an internal reference gene, and the 2−ΔΔCq method (11) was used to calculate cycle threshold values. All experiments were repeated at least 3 times and the data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
Western blot analysis
Total cellular protein was extracted from the cells using RIPA buffer containing 1X protease inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and 1X PMSF. The protein concentration was determined using a BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Shanghai, China). Forty micrograms of protein lysate were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) electrophoresis and transferred onto PVDF membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Mouse anti-human LIPC (1:500, sc-21740) and mouse anti-human β-actin (1:5,000, sc-47778) (both from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA) were used as primary antibodies, followed by incubation with a secondary antibody (goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP; 1:5,000, sc-2005; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). After washing, the immunoreactive bands were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents (Millipore).
Lentiviral transduction and construction of stable cell lines
We selected the HepG2 cell line for shRNA interference assays as the HepG2 cells were found to have a high expression of LIPC. For the knockdown experiments, a LIPC siRNA lentiviral vector and a control vector were constructed (GenePharma Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The mouse LIPC gene sequence (NM-008280) was amplified by PCR and cloned into the pCMV6-Kan/Neo plasmid (OriGene, Rockvile, MD, USA). A specific LIPC siRNA sequence was designed as: 5′-GGA GAA ACC CAG CAA AGA AdTdT-3′ (10). Both constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing before use. To make the lentiviral particle, LIPC/control shRNA plasmid constructs were co-transfected with the helper plasmids pGag/Pol, pRev and pVSV-G into 293T cells (purchased from ATCC) using RNAi-Mate transfection reagent (GenePharma Co., Ltd.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The viral particles were collected and the lentiviral titer was determined by quantifying the EGFP-positive cells by flow cytometry analysis following infection of the 293T cells. To prepare stably transfected cell lines, HepG2 cells at 40–60% confluence (in 24-well plates) were transfected with moieties of infection (MOI) of 10, in the presence of 5 µg/ml polybrene (Sigma). G418 was used to select cells at a concentration of 400 g/ml. The efficiency of transfection was determined by measuring the LIPC levels by western blot analysis after 48–72 h.
Flow cytometric analysis of CD133 expression
To determine the expression of the tumor-derived cell biomarker, CD133, single cell suspensions were collected and re-suspended in 200 µl at a density of 1×106 cells/ml in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.1–0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA). The cells were incubated with antigen presenting cell x(APC)-conjugated anti-human CD133 (130-090-826; Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) for 30 min at 4°C in the dark. Cells incubated with anti-mouse-IgG (sc-2005; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) were used as the isotype control. The cells were washed with pre-chilled PBS twice and re-suspended for flow cytometric analysis. For detecting CD133 expression in the cytoplasm, the cells were first fixed with 100 µl 1% permeabilization buffer in PBS before staining with CD133 antibodies. The assay was repeated 3 times.
Cell proliferation and colony formation assay
The HepG2 cells transfected with shLIPC or shCON vectors were seeded into a 96-well plate at a density of 5,000 cells/well and incubated for 72 h. Subsequently, 20 µl of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) (0.5 mg/ml) was added and incubated for another 4 h at 37°C. The medium was aspirated and 150 ml DMSO was added to dissolve the formazan crystals. After the crystals were completely dissolved, the absorbance was measured using a microplate reader (ELX800; Bio-Tek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA). The number of viable cells was expressed as a percentage of absorbance. For colony formation assays, transfected cells were plated in triplicate into 6-well plates at a density of 200–800 cells/well and incubated for 14 days (12). After being washed and fixed with 70% methanol for 15 min, the cells colonies were stained with 0.1–0.5% crystal violet for 10–15 min. The plates were washed with water and left to dry. The number of colonies containing >50 cells was counted. The experiment was repeated 3 times.
Drug resistance
The cells were treated with or without doxorubicin (0.03–0.3 µM) and 5-FU (0.2–2.0 µM) and further incubated for 48 h. The proliferation of both the shLIPC- and shCON-transfected HepG2 cells was determined by MTT assay as described above.
cDNA microarray analysis
Microarray experiments were performed by RiboBio Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China). Initially, total RNA of the shLIPC/shCON-transfected HepG2 cell lines was extracted and the quantity of RNA was determined using an Agilent 2200 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Three independent samples of each group were prepared and an equal amount of total RNA from each preparation was pooled, respectively. The CDNA was synthesized and labeled with Cy3/Cy5, and randomly hybridized to a RiboArray™ Custom array 1×40K (RiboBio, Guangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The hybridized microarray was scanned and the data were analyzed and normalized. The differentially expressed genes were identified at a fold change ≥2.
GO analysis and pathway enrichment
The gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis of the differentially expressed genes were performed using DAVID tools.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20 software. All data were presented as the means ± SD of three independent experiments. For cell functional assays, the 3 significance between the shLIPC and shCON groups were determined by a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test. For chemo-resistance experiments, data were analyzed with two-factor variance analysis and Student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) test. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Differential expression of LIPC in cancer cells
LIPC activity was examined in colorectal cancer cells (human SW620, SW480 and LoVo cells, and mouse CT26 cells) and hepatoblastoma HepG2 cells. The HepG2 cells exhibited a 1.92-fold higher LIPC activity compared to the other cells (P<0.001) (Fig. 1A). The LIPC mRNA levels in the HepG2 cells determined by RT-qPCR were the highest among the cell lines (P<0.001) (Fig. 1B). Similarly, the protein levels of LIPC in the HepG2 cells were significantly increased compared with the other cell lines (P<0.001) (Fig. 1C). The HepG2 cells exhibited relatively higher levels of LIPC compared to the other cell lines, and were thus selected as a suitable model for shRNA interference assays. The protein levels of LIPC were determined by western blot analysis. Compared with the shCON-transfected cells, the mRNA and protein levels of LIPC were significantly decreased in the shLIPC-transfected cells (P<0.001) (Fig. 1D).
Downregulation of LIPC decreases the expression of CD133
The association between LIPC and the tumor-derived cell marker, CD133, was explored. CD133 expression was decreased significantly in the HepG2 cells transfected with shLIPC (4.62±0.36%) compared to the HepG2 shCON-transfected cells (33.94±0.94%) (P<0.001) (Fig. 2A, left panel). Similar results were observed for CD133 expression in the cytoplasm. The expression of CD133 in the cytoplasm of the HepG2 shLIPC-transfected cells (14.11±0.57%) was significantly decreased compared to that of the HepG2 shCON-transfected cells (50.35 ±0.97%) (P<0.001) (Fig. 2A, right panel).
Downregulation of LIPC decreases cell proliferation and colony formation
MTT assays indicated that cell proliferation was slightly decreased after LIPC knockdown compared to the respective control groups (P<0.05) (Fig. 2B). We also performed a colony formation assay to analyze the proliferative potential of single cells after the silencing of LIPC in vitro. The size of single colony formation in shLIPC-transfected HepG2 cells was markedly smaller and the number of colonies containing ≥50 cells was reduced by 64.4±2.7% compared to the shCON-transfected cells (P<0.001) (Fig. 2C). These data suggest that the knockdown of LIPC inhibits the proliferation and colony formation of HepG2 cells.
Downregulation of LIPC increases chemoresistance in HepG2 cells
Cells transfected with shLIPC exhibited an increased cell viability following treatment with 0.03, 0.1 and 0.3 µM doxorubicin compared to the shCON-transfected cells (P<0.05) (Fig. 3A). Similar results were observed in cells treated with 0.2 and 2.0 µM 5-FU (P<0.01) (Fig. 3B). The current data suggest that the downregulation of LIPC enhances resistance to doxorubicin and 5-FU in HepG2 cells. We observed no significant differences in drug resistance assays following LIPC upregulation (data not shown).
Genes differentially expressed following the knockdown of LIPC
We found 1,602 genes that were upregulated and 716 genes that were downregulated in the shLIPC-transfected cells compared with the shCON-transfected cells using a log2 (fold change) ≥1 as the standard selection criteria. Detailed gene lists of the top 25 of the most differentially expressed genes are summarized in Table I. Eight candidate genes from the microarray analysis were selected for validation by RT-qPCR (Fig. 4).
 | Table ITop 25 upregulated and downregulated transcripts in HepG2 cells after the knockdown of hepatic lipase (LIPC). |
To examine the function of the differentially expressed mRNAs and identify the biological pathway involved, the data were further analyzed using Gene Ontology (GO) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database. GO analysis revealed that the differentially expressed genes fell into the following categories: Regulation of transcription, NA-dependent, signal transduction in biological process ontology; integral to membrane, nucleus and cytoplasm in cellular component ontology; and protein binding, zinc ion binding, and metal ion binding in molecular function ontology (Fig. 5). In KEGG analysis, a total of 124 pathways were regulated by the differentially expressed genes, which mainly involved cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), axon guidance, the vascular endothelia growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathway, and the Wnt signaling pathway. The top 12 regulated pathways are listed in Fig. 6.
Discussion
Little is known about the mechanisms of action of LIPC in cancer cells. Previous studies reported that serum lipase activities were elevated before detection of tumor relapse or progression (13–15). These findings suggest that lipase may play a tumor marker-like role and contributed to the early detection of malignant neoplasm. In this study, we demonstrated that the downregulation of LIPC inhibited CD133 expression in and the colony formation of HepG2 cells.
CD133, also known as prominin-1, is considered a marker for a tumor-derived cell population of brain tumors (16), melanoma (17), prostate (18,19), colon (20,21) and liver cancers (22,23). A number of studies have indicated that CD133(+) cells are capable of greater tumorigenicity and a higher incidence of metastasis compared to CD133(−) cells. O’Brien et al demonstrated that only CD133(+) colon cancer cells were able to initiate tumor growth in immunodeficient mice (20). Bao et al found that CD133(+) glioma cancer cells promoted tumor angiogenesis through VEGF (24). However, the role of CD133 as a tumor-derived cell marker is controversial. In fact, a number of studies have indicated that the CD133(−) population is equally capable, if not more aggressive, of tumor initiation (25,26). Jaksch et al argued that differential CD133 expression may be a marker of different cell cycle stages rather than a marker of stable tumor-derived cells (27). Taken together, these studies suggest that too much attention has been placed on the role of CD133 for the identification of tumor-derived cells, while the actual biological functions of this molecule remain unknown. A previous study by Ding et al revealed that both LIPC and CD133 contributed to liver metastasis (7). The data from the present study revealed that a decreased CD133 expression was associated with LIPC deficiency in HepG2 cells, which was demonstrated to inhibit cell proliferation and decrease the colony formation rates.
However, in terms of chemoresistance, there was no result that was consistent with that of previous literature (8), since the reduction in CD133 expression did not decrease chemoresistance to doxorubicin and 5-FU. It might be that it is LIPC not CD133, which plays a role in regulating drug resistance. As regards the use of CD133 as a stable marker for tumor-derived cells, some previous studies have indicated that the biological behavior of tumor-derived cells is influenced by the surrounding microenvironment, which is affected by tumor stages, histopathological types, nutritional conditions and therapies (28). We found that in LIPC-silenced cells, a higher percentage of ‘membrane-integrated’ genes were downregulated and more cell adhesion molecules were regulated. Under the conditions of cell culture, different surrounding microenvironments affecting cell adhesion in vitro might result in such drug resistance results. In the next step, the drug resistance in vivo is worth investigating.
One intriguing finding of the present study was that the CAM pathway was demonstrated to be the most significantly regulated pathway by the differentially expressed genes. Moreover, the mRNA levels of CLDN10 and CLDN1, which participate in the CAMs pathway, were found to be almost six times and three times higher in shLIPC cells compared to shCON cells, respectively. Some previous studies have indicated that a high expression of CLDN10 was associated with the recurrence of primary hepatic carcinoma, and CLDN10 enhanced cell invasiveness and motility (29,30). Suh et al found that CLDN1 could promote metastasis of liver cancer by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) (31). However, in the present study, we did not see obvious differences in cell migration after the knockdown of LIPC (data not shown). We speculate that the CAM pathway may have important implications for the mechanisms involved in the tumor colony formation induced by LIPC expression.
A limitation of our study was that we performed the experiments in a hepatoma cell in culture, which may present distinct biological features without the regulation of the surrounding microenvironment. Another limitation is that data on more cell lines were not provided in this study. Further studies using animal models and clinical tissue specimens are required in the future. The present findings reveal the potential role of LIPC as a therapeutic target in liver cancer. The association of LIPC and CD133 remains to be determined, and further studies are warranted to determine the specific mechanisms through which LIPC participates in tumor progression.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge Medjaden Bioscience Limited for the English language editing service.
Funding
The study was sponsored by the Returned Scientific Research Foundation of the Ministry of Education and National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81471080) to B.N. This study was supported by the Guangzhou Pilot Project of Clinical and Translational Research Center (early gastrointestinal cancers, no. 7415696196402) and the Guangdong Provincial Bio-engineering Research Center for Gastroenterology Diseases.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors’ contributions
XL, JZ and YF finished most of the experiments and wrote the manuscript. JW and HZ performed the FACS. FD constructed the stable cell lines. BJ, JW and BN designed the experiments and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
|
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E and Forman D: Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 61:69–90. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Asghar U and Meyer T: Are there opportunities for chemotherapy in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer? J Hepatol. 56:686–695. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Sukowati CH, Rosso N, Crocè LS and Tiribelli C: Hepatic cancer stem cells and drug resistance: Relevance in targeted therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol. 2:114–126. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wong H and Schotz MC: The lipase gene family. J Lipid Res. 43:993–999. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Santamarina-Fojo S, González-Navarro H, Freeman L, Wagner E and Nong Z: Hepatic lipase, lipoprotein metabolism, and atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 24:1750–1754. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Nomura DK, Long JZ, Niessen S, Hoover HS, Ng SW and Cravatt BF: Monoacylglycerol lipase regulates a fatty acid network that promotes cancer pathogenesis. Cell. 140:49–61. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ding Q, Chang CJ, Xie X, Xia W, Yang JY, Wang SC, Wang Y, Xia J, Chen L, Cai C, et al: APOBEC3G promotes liver metastasis in an orthotopic mouse model of colorectal cancer and predicts human hepatic metastasis. J Clin Invest. 121:4526–4536. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Galluzzi L, Goubar A, Olaussen KA, Vitale I, Senovilla L, Michels J, Robin A, Dorvault N, Besse B, Validire P, et al: Prognostic value of LIPC in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Cell Cycle. 12:647–654. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ma S, Lee TK, Zheng BJ, Chan KW and Guan XY: CD133+ HCC cancer stem cells confer chemoresistance by preferential expression of the Akt/PKB survival pathway. Oncogene. 27:1749–1758. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Galluzzi L, Senovilla L, Vitale I, Michels J, Martins I, Kepp O, Castedo M and Kroemer G: Molecular mechanisms of cisplatin resistance. Oncogene. 31:1869–1883. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Livak and Schmittgen: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Franken NA, Rodermond HM, Stap J, Haveman J and van Bree C: Clonogenic assay of cells in vitro. Nat Protoc. 1:2315–2319. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Stein W, Bohner J and Bahlinger M: Macro lipase - a new member of the family of immunoglobulin-linked enzymes. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 25:837–843. 1987.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Muñoz-Perez M, Sarrion-Pelous D, Jimenez-Jimenez J, Martinez-Montiel P and Gallego-Valdes M: Chronic increased serum lipase in a patient with suspected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Clin Chem. 43:191–193. 1997.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Diani G, Poma G, Novazzi F, Zanirato S, Porta C, Moroni M, Melzi d’ Eril GV and Moratti R: Increased serum lipase with associated normoamylasemia in cancer patients. Clin Chem. 44:1043–1045. 1998.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Singh SK, Clarke ID, Terasaki M, Bonn VE, Hawkins C, Squire J and Dirks PB: Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors. Cancer Res. 63:5821–5828. 2003.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Fang D, Nguyen TK, Leishear K, Finko R, Kulp AN, Hotz S, Van Belle PA, Xu X, Elder DE and Herlyn M: A tumorigenic subpopulation with stem cell properties in melanomas. Cancer Res. 65:9328–9337. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Collins AT, Berry PA, Hyde C, Stower MJ and Maitland NJ: Prospective identification of tumorigenic prostate cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 65:10946–10951. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Miki J, Furusato B, Li H, Gu Y, Takahashi H, Egawa S, Sesterhenn IA, McLeod DG, Srivastava S and Rhim JS: Identification of putative stem cell markers, CD133 and CXCR4, in hTERT-immortalized primary nonmalignant and malignant tumor-derived human prostate epithelial cell lines and in prostate cancer specimens. Cancer Res. 67:3153–3161. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
O’Brien CA, Pollett A, Gallinger S and Dick JE: A human colon cancer cell capable of initiating tumour growth in immunodeficient mice. Nature. 445:106–110. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ricci-Vitiani L, Lombardi DG, Pilozzi E, Biffoni M, Todaro M, Peschle C and De Maria R: Identification and expansion of human colon-cancer-initiating cells. Nature. 445:111–115. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Suetsugu A, Nagaki M, Aoki H, Motohashi T, Kunisada T and Moriwaki H: Characterization of CD133+ hepatocellular carcinoma cells as cancer stem/progenitor cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 351:820–824. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yin S, Li J, Hu C, Chen X, Yao M, Yan M, Jiang G, Ge C, Xie H, Wan D, et al: CD133 positive hepatocellular carcinoma cells possess high capacity for tumorigenicity. Int J Cancer. 120:1444–1450. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Bao S, Wu Q, Sathornsumetee S, Hao Y, Li Z, Hjelmeland AB, Shi Q, McLendon RE, Bigner DD and Rich JN: Stem cell-like glioma cells promote tumor angiogenesis through vascular endothelial growth factor. Cancer Res. 66:7843–7848. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Shmelkov SV, Butler JM, Hooper AT, Hormigo A, Kushner J, Milde T, St Clair R, Baljevic M, White I, Jin DK, et al: CD133 expression is not restricted to stem cells, and both CD133+ and CD133− metastatic colon cancer cells initiate tumors. J Clin Invest. 118:2111–2120. 2008.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Meng X, Li M, Wang X, Wang Y and Ma D: Both CD133+ and CD133− subpopulations of A549 and H446 cells contain cancer-initiating cells. Cancer Sci. 100:1040–1046. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jaksch M, Múnera J, Bajpai R, Terskikh A and Oshima RG: Cell cycle-dependent variation of a CD133 epitope in human embryonic stem cell, colon cancer, and melanoma cell lines. Cancer Res. 68:7882–7886. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yang JD, Nakamura I and Roberts LR: The tumor microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma: Current status and therapeutic targets. Semin Cancer Biol. 21:35–43. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
|
Cheung ST, Leung KL, Ip YC, Chen X, Fong DY, Ng IO, Fan ST and So S: Claudin-10 expression level is associated with recurrence of primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 11:551–556. 2005.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ip YC, Cheung ST, Lee YT, Ho JC and Fan ST: Inhibition of hepatocellular carcinoma invasion by suppression of claudin-10 in HLE cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 6:2858–2867. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Suh Y, Yoon CH, Kim RK, Lim EJ, Oh YS, Hwang SG, An S, Yoon G, Gye MC, Yi JM, et al: Claudin-1 induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition through activation of the c-Abl-ERK signaling pathway in human liver cells. Oncogene. 32:4873–4882. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar |
