Validation of superior reference genes in mouse submandibular glands under developmental and functional regeneration states

Liu,Huikai; Liu,Huikai; He,Liwen; He,Liwen; Cheng,Qianyu; Cheng,Qianyu; Luo,Wenping; Luo,Wenping; Zhao,Tianyu; Zhao,Tianyu; Yang,Deqin; Yang,Deqin

doi:10.3892/ijmm.2022.5188

Validation of superior reference genes in mouse submandibular glands under developmental and functional regeneration states

Authors:
- Huikai Liu
- Liwen He
- Qianyu Cheng
- Wenping Luo
- Tianyu Zhao
- Deqin Yang
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Endodontics, Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 401147, P.R. China, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences, Chongqing 401147, P.R. China, Chongqing Municipal Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Engineering of Higher Education, Chongqing 401147, P.R. China
Published online on: September 5, 2022 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2022.5188
Article Number: 132
Copyright: © Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

Saliva is crucial for lubricating the mouth and aiding in food digestion. However, the occurrence of oral dysfunction, such as xerostomia, dysphagia or oral infection can markedly reduce the quality of life of affected individuals. The major salivary glands include the submandibular gland (SMG), and sublingual and parotid glands; they are the larger glands in mammals that produce the majority of the saliva. The SMG serves as an effective model for the study of branching morphogenesis and functional regeneration. In order to better understand the key dynamic gene expression patterns during salivary gland development and functional regeneration, it is crucial to search for a panel of reliable reference genes. The present study thus aimed to identify superior reference genes to normalize gene expression data in the SMG under states of development and functional regeneration. First, the developmental SMG samples were harvested from mice in the embryonic and post‑natal periods. Functional regeneration samples from a ductal ligation/de‑ligation model were obtained at several stages. A total of 12 reference genes (Actb, Actg1, Ubc, Uba1, Uba52, Ube2c, Tuba1a, Tuba1b, Tubb5, H2afy, H2afx and Gapdh) from 430 candidates involving tubulin, histone, actin, ubiquitin and GAPDH family members were screened via transcriptome sequencing (RNA‑seq) analysis. RT‑qPCR (SYBR‑Green) and western blot analysis were then used to semi‑quantitatively assess gene and protein expression. The stability of expression was evaluated using the ΔCq, geNorm, BestKeeper, NormFinder and RefFinder methods and software. Actg1 exhibited the highest stability in the SMG developmental stage, while Tubb5 was recommended as the most stable reference gene for the SMG regenerative stage. In summary, the present study provides evidence‑based selections for superior reference genes in the SMG during the stages of development and functional regeneration.

View Figures

View References

1	Proctor GB: The physiology of salivary secretion. Periodontol 2000. 70:11–25. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar
2	Emmerson E and Knox SM: Salivary gland stem cells: A review of development, regeneration and cancer. Genesis. 56:e232112018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
3	Miletich I: Introduction to salivary glands: Structure, function and embryonic development. Front Oral Biol. 14:1–20. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
4	Hosoi K, Yao C, Hasegawa T, Yoshimura H and Akamatsu T: Dynamics of salivary gland AQP5 under normal and pathologic conditions. Int J Mol Sci. 21:11822020. View Article : Google Scholar :
5	Gresik EW, Chung KW, Barka T and Schenkein I: Immunocytochemical localization of nerve growth factor, submandibular glands of Tfm/Y mice. Am J Anat. 158:247–250. 1980. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
6	Schenck K, Schreurs O, Hayashi K and Helgeland K: The role of nerve growth factor (NGF) and its precursor forms in oral wound healing. Int J Mol Sci. 18:3862017. View Article : Google Scholar :
7	Suzuki A, Ogata K and Iwata J: Cell signaling regulation in salivary gland development. Cell Mol Life Sci. 78:3299–3315. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
8	Wang Y, Dong J, Li D, Lai L, Siwko S, Li Y and Liu M: Lgr4 regulates mammary gland development and stem cell activity through the pluripotency transcription factor Sox2. Stem Cells. 31:1921–1931. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
9	Patel N, Sharpe PT and Miletich I: Coordination of epithelial branching and salivary gland lumen formation by Wnt and FGF signals. Dev Biol. 358:156–167. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
10	Hishida S, Ozaki N, Honda T, Shigetomi T, Ueda M, Hibi H and Sugiura Y: Atrophy of submandibular gland by the duct ligation and a blockade of SP receptor in rats. Nagoya J Med Sci. 78:215–227. 2016.PubMed/NCBI
11	Woods LT, Camden JM, El-Sayed FG, Khalafalla MG, Petris MJ, Erb L and Weisman GA: Increased expression of TGF-β signaling components in a mouse model of fibrosis induced by submandibular gland duct ligation. PLoS One. 10:e01236412015. View Article : Google Scholar
12	Tran ON, Wang H, Dean DD, Chen XD and Yeh CK: Stem cell-based restoration of salivary gland function. A Roadmap to Nonhematopoietic Stem Cell-Based Therapeutics: From the Bench to the Clinic. Elsevier; pp. 345–66. 2019, View Article : Google Scholar
13	Shimizu O, Yasumitsu T, Shiratsuchi H, Oka S, Watanabe T, Saito T and Yonehara Y: Immunolocalization of FGF-2, -7, -8, -10 and FGFR-1-4 during regeneration of the rat submandibular gland. J Mol Histol. 46:421–429. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
14	Baum BJ, Alevizos I, Chiorini JA, Cotrim AP and Zheng C: Advances in salivary gland gene therapy - oral and systemic implications. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 15:1443–1454. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
15	González CR, Amer MA, Vitullo AD, González-Calvar SI and Vacas MI: Immunolocalization of the TGFB1 system in submandibular gland fibrosis after experimental periodontitis in rats. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 29:138–143. 2016.PubMed/NCBI
16	Hai B, Zhao Q, Qin L, Rangaraj D, Gutti VR and Liu F: Rescue effects and underlying mechanisms of intragland shh gene delivery on irradiation-induced hyposalivation. Hum Gene Ther. 27:390–399. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
17	Wang B, Duan H, Chong P, Su S, Shan L, Yi D, Wang L and Li Y: Systematic selection and validation of suitable reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR normalization studies of gene expression in Nitraria tangutorum. Sci Rep. 10:158912020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
18	Yang NY, Mukaibo T, Kurtz I and Melvin JE: The apical Na⁺-HCO₃⁻ cotransporter Slc4a7 (NBCn1) does not contribute to bicarbonate transport by mouse salivary gland ducts. J Cell Physiol. 10:10022019.
19	Tanaka J, Ogawa M, Hojo H, Kawashima Y, Mabuchi Y, Hata K, Nakamura S, Yasuhara R, Takamatsu K, Irié T, et al: Generation of orthotopically functional salivary gland from embryonic stem cells. Nat Commun. 9:42162018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
20	Zhang Y, Fan J, Sun J, Francis F and Chen J: Transcriptome analysis of the salivary glands of the grain aphid, Sitobion avenae. Sci Rep. 7:159112017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
21	Ruan W and Lai M: Actin, a reliable marker of internal control? Clin Chim Acta. 385:1–5. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
22	Bunnell TM, Burbach BJ, Shimizu Y and Ervasti JM: β-actin specifically controls cell growth, migration, and the G-actin pool. Mol Biol Cell. 22:4047–4058. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
23	Guo C, Liu S, Wang J, Sun MZ and Greenaway FT: ACTB in cancer. Clin Chim Acta. 417:39–44. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar
24	Binarová P and Tuszynski J: Tubulin: Structure, functions and roles in disease. Cells. 8:12942019. View Article : Google Scholar :
25	Nicholls C, Li H and Liu JP: GAPDH: A common enzyme with uncommon functions. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 39:674–679. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar
26	Seidler NW: Basic biology of GAPDH. Adv Exp Med Biol. 985:1–36. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar
27	Zhang JY, Zhang F, Hong CQ, Giuliano AE, Cui XJ, Zhou GJ, Zhang GJ and Cui YK: Critical protein GAPDH and its regulatory mechanisms in cancer cells. Cancer Biol Med. 12:10–22. 2015.PubMed/NCBI
28	Chen ZJ and Sun LJ: Nonproteolytic functions of ubiquitin in cell signaling. Mol Cell. 33:275–286. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
29	Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar
30	Ramakers C, Ruijter JM, Deprez RH and Moorman AF: Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data. Neurosci Lett. 339:62–66. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
31	Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A and Speleman F: Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 3:RESEARCH00342002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
32	Andersen CL, Jensen JL and Ørntoft TF: Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: A model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res. 64:5245–5250. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
33	Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C and Neuvians TP: Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper-excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett. 26:509–515. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
34	Xie F, Xiao P, Chen D, Xu L and Zhang B: miRDeepFinder: A miRNA analysis tool for deep sequencing of plant small RNAs. Plant Mol Biol. 31:10072012.
35	Chatzeli L, Teshima THN, Hajihosseini MK, Gaete M, Proctor GB and Tucker AS: Comparing development and regeneration in the submandibular gland highlights distinct mechanisms. J Anat. 238:1371–1385. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
36	Gresik EW: Postnatal developmental changes in submandibular glands of rats and mice. J Histochem Cytochem. 28:860–870. 1980. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
37	Srinivasan R and Chang WW: The development of the granular convoluted duct in the rat submandibular gland. Anat Rec. 182:29–39. 1975. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
38	Borkowska P, Zielińska A, Paul-Samojedny M, Stojko R and Kowalski J: Evaluation of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR in Wharton's Jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells after lentiviral transduction and differentiation. Mol Biol Rep. 47:1107–1115. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar
39	Li Z, Lu H, He Z, Wang C, Wang Y and Ji X: Selection of appropriate reference genes for quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR in Betula platyphylla under salt and osmotic stress conditions. PLoS One. 14:e02259262019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
40	Wu Y, Tian Q, Huang W, Liu J, Xia X, Yang X and Mou H: Identification and evaluation of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR analysis in Passiflora edulis under stem rot condition. Mol Biol Rep. 47:2951–2962. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
41	Zhu J, Zhang L, Li W, Han S, Yang W and Qi L: Reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR normalization in Caragana intermedia under different abiotic stress conditions. PLoS one. 8:e531962013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
42	Li J, Han X, Wang C, Qi W, Zhang W, Tang L and Zhao X: Validation of suitable reference genes for RT-qPCR data in achyranthes bidentata blume under different experimental conditions. Front Plant Sci. 8:7762017. View Article : Google Scholar :
43	Deindl E, Boengler K, van Royen N and Schaper W: Differential expression of GAPDH and beta3-actin in growing collateral arteries. Mol Cell Biochem. 236:139–146. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
44	Suzuki T, Higgins PJ and Crawford DR: Control selection for RNA quantitation. Biotechniques. 29:332–337. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
45	Silver N, Cotroneo E, Proctor G, Osailan S, Paterson KL and Carpenter GH: Selection of housekeeping genes for gene expression studies in the adult rat submandibular gland under normal, inflamed, atrophic and regenerative states. BMC Mol Biol. 9:642008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
46	Chen L, Zhong HY, Kuang JF, Li JG, Lu WJ and Chen JY: Validation of reference genes for RT-qPCR studies of gene expression in banana fruit under different experimental conditions. Planta. 234:377–390. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
47	Cheng Y, Bian W, Pang X, Yu J, Ahammed GJ, Zhou G, Wang R, Ruan M, Li Z, Ye Q, et al: Genome-wide identification and evaluation of reference genes for quantitative RT-PCR analysis during tomato fruit development. Front Plant Sci. 8:14402017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
48	Costa J, Saraiva K, Morais V, Oliveira J, Sousa D, Melo D, Morais J and Vasconcelos I: Reference gene identification for real-time PCR analyses in soybean leaves under fungus (Cercospora kikuchii) infection and treatments with salicylic and jasmonic acids. Australasian Plant Pathology. 45:191–199. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar
49	Zhang Y, Peng X, Liu Y, Li Y, Luo Y, Wang X and Tang H: Evaluation of suitable reference genes for qRT-PCR normalization in strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa) under different experimental conditions. BMC Mol Biol. 19:82018. View Article : Google Scholar
50	Herath S, Dai H, Erlich J, Au AY, Taylor K, Succar L and Endre ZH: Selection and validation of reference genes for normalisation of gene expression in ischaemic and toxicological studies in kidney disease. PLoS One. 15:e02331092020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
51	Matsuzaki T, Suzuki T, Koyama H, Tanaka S and Takata K: Aquaporin-5 (AQP5), a water channel protein, in the rat salivary and lacrimal glands: Immunolocalization and effect of secretory stimulation. Cell Tissue Res. 295:513–521. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
52	Hauser BR and Hoffman MP: Regulatory mechanisms driving salivary gland organogenesis. Curr Top Dev Biol. 115:111–130. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
53	Li C, Hu L, Wang X, Liu H, Tian H and Wang J: Selection of reliable reference genes for gene expression analysis in seeds at different developmental stages and across various tissues in Paeonia ostii. Mol Biol Rep. 46:6003–6011. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
54	Dos Santos CP, da Cruz Saraiva KD, Batista MC, Germano TA and Costa JH: Identification and evaluation of reference genes for reliable normalization of real-time quantitative PCR data in acerola fruit, leaf, and flower. Mol Biol Rep. 47:953–965. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar
55	Wang X, Wu Z, Bao W, Hu H, Chen M, Chai T and Wang H: Identification and evaluation of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR analysis in Polygonum cuspidatum based on transcriptome data. BMC Plant Biol. 19:4982019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI