|
1
|
Carley ME, Klingele CJ, Gebhart JB, Webb
MJ and Wilson TO: Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the management
of benign unilateral adnexal masses. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc.
9:321–326. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Jacobs I, Oram D, Fairbanks J, Turner J,
Frost C and Grudzinskas JG: A risk of malignancy index
incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the
accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Br J Obstet
Gynaecol. 97:922–929. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Kaijser J, Sayasneh A, Van Hoorde K, et
al: Presurgical diagnosis of adnexal tumours using mathematical
models and scoring systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hum Reprod Update. 20:449–462. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
4
|
Sayasneh A, Wynants L, Preisler J, et al:
Multicentre external validation of IOTA prediction models and RMI
by operators with varied training. Br J Cancer. 108:2448–2454.
2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Timmerman D, Van Calster B, Testa AC, et
al: Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using
ultrasound-based logistic regression models: a temporal and
external validation study by the IOTA group. Ultrasound Obstet
Gynecol. 36:226–234. 2010. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Timmerman D, Ameye L, Fischerova D, et al:
Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant
adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA
group. BMJ. 341:c68392010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Testa A, Kaijser J, Wynants L, et al:
Strategies to diagnosie ovarian cancer: new evidence from phase 3
of the multicentre international IOTA study. Br J Cancer.
111:680–688. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Valentin L, Ameye L, Savelli L, et al:
Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using
subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound
findings: logistic regression models do not help. Ultrasound Obstet
Gynecol. 38:456–465. 2011. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Timmerman D, Schwarzler P, Collins WP, et
al: Subjective assessment of adnexal masses with the use of
ultrasonography: an analysis of interobserver variability and
experience. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 13:11–16. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Timmerman D: The use of mathematical
models to evaluate pelvic masses; can they beat an expert operator?
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 18:91–104. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Valentin L, Hagen B, Tingulstad S and
Eik-Nes S: Comparison of ‘pattern recognition’ and logistic
regression models for discrimination between benign and malignant
pelvic masses: a prospective cross validation. Ultrasound Obstet
Gynecol. 18:357–365. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
12
|
Valentin L: Pattern recognition of pelvic
masses by gray-scale ultrasound imaging: the contribution of
Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 14:338–347. 1999.
View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
Sokalska A, Timmerman D, Testa AC, et al:
Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for
assigning a specific diagnosis to adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet
Gynecol. 34:462–470. 2009. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
Jeong YY, Outwater EK and Kang HK: Imaging
evaluation of ovarian masses. Radiographics. 20:1445–1470. 2000.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Valentin L: Use of morphology to
characterize and manage common adnexal masses. Best Pract Res Clin
Obstet Gynaecol. 18:71–89. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Kurachi H, Murakami T, Nakamura H, et al:
Imaging of peritoneal pseudocysts: value of MR imaging compared
with sonography and CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 161:589–591. 1993.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Jain KA: Imaging of peritoneal inclusion
cysts. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 174:1559–1563. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Savelli L, de Iaco P, Ghi T, Bovicelli L,
Rosati F and Cacciatore B: Transvaginal sonographic appearance of
peritoneal pseudocysts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 23:284–288.
2004. View
Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Dorum A, Blom GP, Ekerhovd E and Granberg
S: Prevalence and histologic diagnosis of adnexal cysts in
postmenopausal women: an autopsy study. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
192:48–54. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Savelli L, Ghi T, De Iaco P, Ceccaroni M,
Venturoli S and Cacciatore B: Paraovarian/paratubal cysts:
comparison of transvaginal sonographic and pathological findings to
establish diagnostic criteria. Ultrasound Obstetrics Gynecol.
28:330–334. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
21
|
Smorgick N, Herman A, Schneider D,
Halperin R and Pansky M: Paraovarian cysts of neoplastic origin are
underreported. JSLS. 13:22–26. 2009.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
22
|
Timor-Tritsch IE, Lerner JP, Monteagudo A,
Murphy KE and Heller DS: Transvaginal sonographic markers of tubal
inflammatory disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 12:56–66. 1998.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Romosan G, Bjartling C, Skoog L and
Valentin L: Ultrasound for diagnosing acute salpingitis: a
prospective observational diagnostic study. Hum Reprod.
28:1569–1579. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Lai MP, Mais V,
Paoletti AM and Melis GB: Transvaginal ultrasonography associated
with colour Doppler energy in the diagnosis of hydrosalpinx. Hum
Reprod. 15:1568–1572. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Karlan BY, Bristow RE and Li AJ:
Gynecologic Oncology: Clinical Practice & Surgical Atlas.
McGraw-Hill Medical; New York, NY: 2012
|
|
26
|
Caspi B, Hagay Z and Appelman Z: Variable
echogenicity as a sonographic sign in the preoperative diagnosis of
ovarian mucinous tumors. J Ultrasound Med. 25:1583–1585.
2006.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
27
|
Alcazar JL, Errasti T, Minguez JA, Galan
MJ, Garcia-Manero M and Ceamanos C: Sonographic features of ovarian
cystadenofibromas: spectrum of findings. J Ultrasound Med.
20:915–919. 2001.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
28
|
Ameye L, Timmerman D, Valentin L, et al:
Clinically oriented three-step strategy for assessment of adnexal
pathology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 40:582–591. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
29
|
Jermy K, Luise C and Bourne T: The
characterization of common ovarian cysts in premenopausal women.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 17:140–144. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
30
|
Cohen L and Sabbagha R: Echo patterns of
benign cystic teratomas by transvaginal ultrasound. Ultrasound
Obstet Gynecol. 3:120–123. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
31
|
Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Mais V, Risalvato
A, Lai MP and Melis GB: The diagnosis of endometriomas using colour
Doppler energy imaging. Hum Reprod. 13:1691–1695. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
32
|
Van Holsbeke C, Van Calster B, Guerriero
S, et al: Endometriomas: their ultrasound characteristics.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 35:730–740. 2010.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
33
|
Asch E and Levine D: Variations in
appearance of endometriomas. J Ultrasound Med. 26:993–1002.
2007.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
34
|
Sayasneh A, Naji O, Abdallah Y, Stalder C
and Bourne T: Changes seen in the ultrasound features of a presumed
decidualised ovarian endometrioma mimicking malignancy. J Obstet
Gynaecol. 32:807–811. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
35
|
Testa AC, Timmerman D, Van Holsbeke C, et
al: Ovarian cancer arising in endometrioid cysts: ultrasound
findings. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 38:99–106. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
36
|
Yen P, Khong K, Lamba R, Corwin MT and
Gerscovich EO: Ovarian fibromas and fibrothecomas: sonographic
correlation with computed tomography and magnetic resonance
imaging: a 5-year single-institution experience. J Ultrasound Med.
32:13–18. 2013.
|
|
37
|
Paladini D, Testa A, Van Holsbeke C,
Mancari R, Timmerman D and Valentin L: Imaging in gynecological
disease (5): clinical and ultrasound characteristics in fibroma and
fibrothecoma of the ovary. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 34:188–195.
2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
38
|
Roth LM and Talerman A: The enigma of
struma ovarii. Pathology. 39:139–146. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
39
|
Zalel Y, Seidman DS, Oren M, et al:
Sonographic and clinical characteristics of struma ovarii. J
Ultrasound Med. 19:857–861. 2000.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
40
|
Savelli L, Testa AC, Timmerman D, Paladini
D, Ljungberg O and Valentin L: Imaging of gynecological disease
(4): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of struma ovarii.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 32:210–219. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
41
|
Green GE, Mortele KJ, Glickman JN and
Benson CB: Brenner tumors of the ovary: sonographic and computed
tomographic imaging features. J Ultrasound Med. 25:1245–1254.
2006.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
42
|
Sherer DM, Dalloul M, Salame G, et al:
Color Doppler sonographic features of a Brenner tumor in pregnancy.
J Ultrasound Med. 28:1405–1408. 2009.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
43
|
Dierickx I, Valentin L, Van Holsbeke C, et
al: Imaging in gynecological disease (7): clinical and ultrasound
features of Brenner tumors of the ovary. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
40:706–713. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
44
|
Valentin L, Ameye L, Testa A, et al:
Ultrasound characteristics of different types of adnexal
malignancies. Gynecol Oncol. 102:41–48. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
45
|
Exacoustos C, Romanini ME, Rinaldo D, et
al: Preoperative sonographic features of borderline ovarian tumors.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 25:50–59. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
46
|
Pascual MA, Tresserra F, Grases PJ,
Labastida R and Dexeus S: Borderline cystic tumors of the ovary:
gray-scale and color Doppler sonographic findings. J Clin
Ultrasound. 30:76–82. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
47
|
Hassen K, Ghossain MA, Rousset P, et al:
Characterization of papillary projections in benign versus
borderline and malignant ovarian masses on conventional and color
Doppler ultrasound. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 196:1444–1449. 2011.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
48
|
Fruscella E, Testa AC, Ferrandina G, et
al: Ultrasound features of different histopathological subtypes of
borderline ovarian tumors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 26:644–650.
2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
49
|
Darai E, Teboul J, Walker F, et al:
Epithelial ovarian carcinoma of low malignant potential. Eur J
Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 66:141–145. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
50
|
Testa AC, Ferrandina G, Timmerman D, et
al: Imaging in gynecological disease (1): ultrasound features of
metastases in the ovaries differ depending on the origin of the
primary tumor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 29:505–511. 2007.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
51
|
Testa AC, Mancari R, Di Legge A, et al:
The ‘lead vessel’: a vascular ultrasound feature of metastasis in
the ovaries. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 31:218–221. 2008.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
