Three‑dimensional models to study breast cancer (Review)
- Authors:
- Maira Huerta‑Reyes
- Arturo Aguilar‑Rojas
-
Affiliations: Medical Research Unit in Nephrological Diseases, Mexican Institute of Social Security, National Medical Center Century XXI, Specialty Hospital, Mexico City 06720, Mexico, Medical Research Unit in Reproductive Medicine, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Obstetric and Gynecological Hospital, Mexico City 01090, Mexico - Published online on: January 25, 2021 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2021.5176
- Pages: 331-343
This article is mentioned in:
Abstract
Ahmad A: Breast cancer statistics: Recent trends. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1152:1–7. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rivera-Franco MM and Leon-Rodriguez E: Delays in breast cancer detection and treatment in developing countries. Breast Cancer (Auckl). 12:11782234177526772018. | |
Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration; Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A, Hamavid H, Moradi-Lakeh M, MacIntyre MF, Allen C, Hansen G, Woodbrook R, et al: The global burden of cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol. 1:505–527. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hanahan D and Coussens LM: Accessories to the crime: Functions of cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 21:309–322. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mittal S, Brown NJ and Holen I: The breast tumor microenvironment: Role in cancer development, progression and response to therapy. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 18:227–243. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Conklin MW and Keely PJ: Why the stroma matters in breast cancer: Insights into breast cancer patient outcomes through the examination of stromal biomarkers. Cell Adh Migr. 6:249–260. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Insua-Rodríguez J and Oskarsson T: The extracellular matrix in breast cancer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 97:41–55. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Friedl P and Alexander S: Cancer invasion and the microenvironment: Plasticity and reciprocity. Cell. 147:992–1009. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kaushik S, Pickup MW and Weaver VM: From transformation to metastasis: Deconstructing the extracellular matrix in breast cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 35:655–667. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Natal RA, Paiva GR, Pelegati VB, Marenco L, Alvarenga CA, Vargas RF, Derchain SF, Sarian LO, Franchet C, Cesar CL, et al: Exploring collagen parameters in pure special types of invasive breast cancer. Sci Rep. 9:77152019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vuong D, Simpson PT, Green B, Cummings MC and Lakhani SR: Molecular classification of breast cancer. Virchows Arch. 465:1–14. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Comşa Ş, Cimpean AM and Raica M: The story of MCF-7 breast cancer cell line: 40 years of experience in research. Anticancer Res. 35:3147–3154. 2015.PubMed/NCBI | |
Ravi M, Sneka MK and Joshipura A: The culture conditions and outputs from breast cancer cell line in vitro experiments. Exp Cell Res. 383:1115482019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kim JB, O'Hare MJ and Stein R: Models of breast cancer: Is merging human and animal models the future? Breast Cancer Res. 6:22–30. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Bersini S, Jeon JS, Dubini G, Arrigoni C, Chung S, Charest JL, Moretti M and Kamm RD: A microfluidic 3D in vitro model for specificity of breast cancer metastasis to bone. Biomaterials. 35:2454–2461. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
dit Faute MA, Laurent L, Ploton D, Poupon MF, Jardillier JC and Bobichon H: Distinctive alterations of invasiveness, drug resistance and cell-cell organization in 3D-cultures of MCF-7, a human breast cancer cell line, and its multidrug resistant variant. Clin Exp Metastasis. 19:161–168. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lovitt CJ, Shelper TB and Avery VM: Evaluation of chemotherapeutics in a three-dimensional breast cancer model. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 141:951–959. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mehta G, Hsiao AY, Ingram M, Luker GD and Takayama S: Opportunities and challenges for use of tumor spheroids as models to test drug delivery and efficacy. J Control Release. 164:192–204. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Froehlich K, Haeger JD, Heger J, Pastuschek J, Photini SM, Yan Y, Lupp A, Pfarrer C, Mrowka R, Schleußner E, et al: Generation of multicellular breast cancer tumor spheroids: Comparison of different protocols. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 21:89–98. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bahcecioglu G, Basara G, Ellis BW, Ren X and Zorlutuna P: Breast cancer models: Engineering the tumor microenvironment. Acta Biomater. 106:1–21. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nagelkerke A, Bussink J, Sweep FC and Span PN: Generation of multicellular tumor spheroids of breast cancer cells: How to go three-dimensional. Anal Biochem. 437:17–19. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Singh M, Mukundan S, Jaramillo M, Oesterreich S and Sant S: Three-dimensional breast cancer models mimic hallmarks of size-induced tumor progression. Cancer Res. 76:3732–3743. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang W, Li C, Baguley BC, Zhou F, Zhou W, Shaw JP, Wang Z, Wu Z and Liu J: Optimization of the formation of embedded multicellular spheroids of MCF-7 cells: How to reliably produce a biomimetic 3D model. Anal Biochem. 515:47–54. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Asghar W, El Assal R, Shafiee H, Pitteri S, Paulmurugan R and Demirci U: Engineering cancer microenvironments for in vitro 3-D tumor models. Mater Today (Kidlington). 18:539–553. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Rodríguez CE, Berardi DE, Abrigo M, Todaro LB, Bal de Kier Joffé ED and Fiszman GL: Breast cancer stem cells are involved in trastuzumab resistance through the HER2 modulation in 3D culture. J Cell Biochem. 119:1381–1391. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zhao L, Xiu J, Liu Y, Zhang T, Pan W, Zheng X and Zhang X: A 3D printed hanging drop dripper for tumor spheroids analysis without recovery. Sci Rep. 9:197172019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Metzger W, Sossong D, Bächle A, Pütz N, Wennemuth G, Pohlemann T and Oberringer M: The liquid overlay technique is the key to formation of co-culture spheroids consisting of primary osteoblasts, fibroblasts and endothelial cells. Cytotherapy. 13:1000–1012. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang S, Yuan N, Wang G, Wu F, Feng L, Luo M, Li M, Luo A, Zhao X and Zhang L: Cellular communication promotes mammosphere growth and collective invasion through microtubule-like structures and angiogenesis. Oncol Rep. 40:3297–3312. 2018.PubMed/NCBI | |
Berger AJ, Renner CM, Hale I, Yang X, Ponik SM, Weisman PS, Masters KS and Kreeger PK: Scaffold stiffness influences breast cancer cell invasion via EGFR-linked Mena upregulation and matrix remodeling. Matrix Biol. 85:80–93. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Guzman A, Sánchez Alemany V, Nguyen Y, Zhang CR and Kaufman LJ: A novel 3D in vitro metastasis model elucidates differential invasive strategies during and after breaching basement membrane. Biomaterials. 115:19–29. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Dubois C, Dufour R, Daumar P, Aubel C, Szczepaniak C, Blavignac C, Mounetou E, Penault-Llorca F and Bamdad M: Development and cytotoxic response of two proliferative MDA-MB-231 and non-proliferative SUM1315 three-dimensional cell culture models of triple-negative basal-like breast cancer cell lines. Oncotarget. 8:953162017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Smalley KS, Lioni M, Noma K, Haass NK and Herlyn M: In vitro three-dimensional tumor microenvironment models for anti-cancer drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 3:1–10. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Costa EC, Gaspar VM, Coutinho P and Correia IJ: Optimization of liquid overlay technique to formulate heterogenic 3D co-cultures models. Biotechnol Bioeng. 111:1672–1685. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Costa EC, de Melo-Diogo D, Moreira AF, Carvalho MP and Correia IJ: Spheroids formation on non-adhesive surfaces by liquid overlay technique: Considerations and practical approaches. Biotechnol J. 13:2018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kosaka T, Tsuboi S, Fukaya K, Pu H, Ohno T, Tsuji T, Miyazaki M and Namba M: Spheroid cultures of human hepatoblastoma cells (HuH-6 line) and their application for cytotoxicity assay of alcohols. Acta Medica Okayama. 50:61–66. 1996.PubMed/NCBI | |
Kelm JM, Timmins NE, Brown CJ, Fussenegger M and Nielsen LK: Method for generation of homogeneous multicel-lular tumor spheroids applicable to a wide variety of cell types. Biotechnol Bioeng. 83:173–180. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Robertson FM, Ogasawara MA, Ye Z, Chu K, Pickei R, Debeb BG, Woodward WA, Hittelman WN, Cristofanilli M and Barsky SH: Imaging and analysis of 3D tumor spheroids enriched for a cancer stem cell phenotype. J Biomol Screen. 15:820–829. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lorenzo C, Frongia C, Jorand R, Fehrenbach J, Weiss P, Maandhui A, Gay G, Ducommun B and Lobjois V: Live cell division dynamics monitoring in 3D large spheroid tumor models using light sheet microscopy. Cell Div. 6:222011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Leonard F and Godin B: 3D in vitro model for breast cancer research using magnetic levitation and bioprinting method. Methods Mol Biol. 1406:239–251. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jaganathan H, Gage J, Leonard F, Srinivasan S, Souza GR, Dave B and Godin B: Three-dimensional in vitro co-culture model of breast tumor using magnetic levitation. Sci Rep. 4:64682014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Eckhardt BL, Gagliardi M, Iles L, Evans K, Ivan C, Liu X, Liu CG, Souza G, Rao A, Meric-Bernstam F, et al: Clinically relevant inflammatory breast cancer patient-derived xenograft-derived ex vivo model for evaluation of tumor-specific therapies. PLoS One. 13:e01959322018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lin RZ and Chang HY: Recent advances in three-dimensional multicellular spheroid culture for biomedical research. Biotechnol J. 3:1172–1184. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Swaminathan S, Hamid Q, Sun W and Clyne AM: Bioprinting of 3D breast epithelial spheroids for human cancer models. Biofabrication. 11:0250032019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ong CS, Yesantharao P, Huang CY, Mattson G, Boktor J, Fukunishi T, Zhang H and Hibino N: 3D bioprinting using stem cells. Pediatr Res. 83:223–231. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kingsley DM, Roberge CL, Rudkouskaya A, Faulkner DE, Barroso M, Intes X and Corr DT: Laser-based 3D bioprinting for spatial and size control of tumor spheroids and embryoid bodies. Acta Biomater. 95:357–370. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ham SL, Joshi R, Luker GD and Tavana H: Engineered breast cancer cell spheroids reproduce biologic properties of solid tumors. Adv Healthc Mater. 5:2788–2798. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ham SL, Thakuri PS, Plaster M, Li J, Luker KE, Luker GD and Tavana H: Three-dimensional tumor model mimics stromal-breast cancer cells signaling. Oncotarget. 9:249–267. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Atefi E, Lemmo S, Fyffe D, Luker GD and Tavana H: High throughput, polymeric aqueous two-phase printing of tumor spheroids. Adv Funct Mater. 24:6509–6515. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lemmo S, Atefi E, Luker GD and Tavana H: Optimization of aqueous biphasic tumor spheroid microtechnology for anti-cancer drug testing in 3D culture. Cell Mol Bioeng. 7:344–354. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shahi Thakuri P, Ham SL, Luker GD and Tavana H: Multiparametric analysis of oncology drug screening with aqueous two-phase tumor spheroids. Mol Pharm. 13:3724–3735. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sackmann EK, Fulton AL and Beebe DJ: The present and future role of microfluidics in biomedical research. Nature. 507:181–189. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sen AK, Raj A, Banerjee U and Iqbal SR: Soft lithography, molding, and micromachining techniques for polymer micro devices. Microfluidic Electrophoresis. Methods in Molecular Biology. Dutta D: 1906. Humana Press Springer; New York, NY: pp. 13–54. 2019, View Article : Google Scholar | |
Halldorsson S, Lucumi E, Gómez-Sjöberg R and Fleming RMT: Advantages and challenges of microfluidic cell culture in polydimethylsiloxane devices. Biosens Bioelectron. 63:218–231. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sontheimer-Phelps A, Hassell BA and Ingber DE: Modelling cancer in microfluidic human organs-on-chips. Nat Rev Cancer. 19:65–81. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yum K, Hong SG, Healy KE and Lee LP: Physiologically relevant organs on chips. Biotechnol J. 9:16–27. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wang JD, Douville NJ, Takayama S and ElSayed M: Quantitative analysis of molecular absorption into PDMS microfluidic channels. Ann Biomed Eng. 40:1862–1873. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Choi Y, Hyun E, Seo J, Blundell C, Kim HC, Lee E, Lee SH, Moon A, Moon WK and Huh D: A microengineered patho-physiological model of early-stage breast cancer. Lab Chip. 15:3350–3357. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Montanez-Sauri SI, Sung KE, Berthier E and Beebe DJ: Enabling screening in 3D microenvironments: Probing matrix and stromal effects on the morphology and proliferation of T47D breast carcinoma cells. Integr Biol (Camb). 5:631–640. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lang JD, Berry SM, Powers GL, Beebe DJ and Alarid ET: Hormonally responsive breast cancer cells in a microfluidic co-culture model as a sensor of microenvironmental activity. Integr Biol (Camb). 5:807–816. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Regier MC, Maccoux LJ, Weinberger EM, Regehr KJ, Berry SM, Beebe DJ and Alarid ET: Transitions from mono-to co-to tri-culture uniquely affect gene expression in breast cancer, stromal, and immune compartments. Biomed Microdevices. 18:702016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Dongre A and Weinberg RA: New insights into the mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and implications for cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 20:69–84. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Eslami Amirabadi H, SahebAli S, Frimat JP, Luttge R and den Toonder JMJ: A novel method to understand tumor cell invasion: Integrating extracellular matrix mimicking layers in microfluidic chips by 'selective curing'. Biomed Microdevices. 19:922017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Eslami Amirabadi H, Tuerlings M, Hollestelle A, SahebAli S, Luttge R, van Donkelaar CC, Martens JWM and den Toonder JMJ: Characterizing the invasion of different breast cancer cell lines with distinct E-cadherin status in 3D using a microfluidic system. Biomed Microdevices. 21:1012019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Toh YC, Raja A, Yu H and van Noort D: A 3D microfluidic model to recapitulate cancer cell migration and invasion. Bioengineering (Basel). 5:292018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Blaha L, Zhang C, Cabodi M and Wong JY: A microfluidic platform for modeling metastatic cancer cell matrix invasion. Biofabrication. 9:0450012017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Devadas D, Moore TA, Walji N and Young EWK: A microfluidic mammary gland coculture model using parallel 3D lumens for studying epithelial-endothelial migration in breast cancer. Biomicrofluidics. 13:0641222019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li R, Hebert JD, Lee TA, Xing H, Boussommier-Calleja A, Hynes RO, Lauffenburger DA and Kamm RD: Macrophage-secreted TNFα and TGFβ1 influence migration speed and persistence of cancer cells in 3D tissue culture via independent pathways. Cancer Res. 77:279–290. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Nagaraju S, Truong D, Mouneimne G and Nikkhah M: Microfluidic tumor-vascular model to study breast cancer cell invasion and intravasation. Adv Healthc Mater. 7:17012572018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Tang Y, Soroush F, Sheffield JB, Wang B, Prabhakarpandian B and Kiani MF: A biomimetic microfluidic tumor microenvironment platform mimicking the EPR effect for rapid screening of drug delivery systems. Sci Rep. 7:93592017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lanz HL, Saleh A, Kramer B, Cairns J, Ng CP, Yu J, Trietsch SJ, Hankemeier T, Joore J, Vulto P, et al: Therapy response testing of breast cancer in a 3D high-throughput perfused microfluidic platform. BMC Cancer. 17:7092017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bahlmann LC, Smith LJ and Shoichet MS: Designer biomaterials to model cancer cell invasion in vitro: Predictive tools or just pretty pictures. Adv Funct Mater. 30:19090322020. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chen L, Xiao Z, Meng Y, Zhao Y, Han J, Su G, Chen B and Dai J: The enhancement of cancer stem cell properties of MCF-7 cells in 3D collagen scaffolds for modeling of cancer and anti-cancer drugs. Biomaterials. 33:1437–1444. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Antoine EE, Vlachos PP and Rylander MN: Review of collagen I hydrogels for bioengineered tissue microenvironments: Characterization of mechanics, structure, and transport. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 20:683–696. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu J, Tan Y, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Xu P, Chen J, Poh YC, Tang K, Wang N and Huang B: Soft fibrin gels promote selection and growth of tumorigenic cells. Nat Mater. 11:734–741. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kleinman HK and Martin GR: Matrigel: Basement membrane matrix with biological activity. Semin Cancer Biol. 15:378–386. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Krause S, Maffini MV, Soto AM and Sonnenschein C: The microenvironment determines the breast cancer cells' phenotype: Organization of MCF7 cells in 3D cultures. BMC Cancer. 10:2632010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Whitman NA, Lin ZW, Kenney RM, Albertini L and Lockett MR: Hypoxia differentially regulates estrogen receptor alpha in 2D and 3D culture formats. Arch Biochem Biophys. 671:8–17. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Palomeras S, Rabionet M, Ferrer I, Sarrats A, Garcia-Romeu ML, Puig T and Ciurana J: Breast cancer stem cell culture and enrichment using poly(ε-Caprolactone) scaffolds. Molecules. 21:5372016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wessels DJ, Pradhan N, Park YN, Klepitsch MA, Lusche DF, Daniels KJ, Conway KD, Voss ER, Hegde SV, Conway TP and Soll DR: Reciprocal signaling and direct physical interactions between fibroblasts and breast cancer cells in a 3D environment. PLoS One. 14:e02188542019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
James-Bhasin M, Siegel PM and Nazhat SN: A three-dimensional dense collagen hydrogel to model cancer cell/osteoblast interactions. J Funct Biomater. 9:722018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Cox RF, Jenkinson A, Pohl K, O'Brien FJ and Morgan MP: Osteomimicry of mammary adenocarcinoma cells in vitro; increased expression of bone matrix proteins and proliferation within a 3D collagen environment. PLoS One. 7:e416792012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Berger AJ, Linsmeier KM, Kreeger PK and Masters KS: Decoupling the effects of stiffness and fiber density on cellular behaviors via an interpenetrating network of gelatin-methacrylate and collagen. Biomaterials. 141:125–135. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Conklin MW, Eickhoff JC, Riching KM, Pehlke CA, Eliceiri KW, Provenzano PP, Friedl A and Keely PJ: Aligned collagen is a prognostic signature for survival in human breast carcinoma. Am J Pathol. 178:1221–1232. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bredfeldt JS, Liu Y, Conklin MW, Keely PJ, Mackie TR and Eliceiri KW: Automated quantification of aligned collagen for human breast carcinoma prognosis. J Pathol Inform. 5:282014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang Y, Mirza S, Wu S, Zeng J, Shi W, Band H, Band V and Duan B: 3D hydrogel breast cancer models for studying the effects of hypoxia on epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Oncotarget. 9:321912018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Peppas NA, Hilt JZ, Khademhosseini A and Langer R: Hydrogels in biology and medicine: From molecular principles to bionanotechnology. Adv Mater. 18:1345–1360. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Livingston MK, Morgan MM, Daly WT, Murphy WL, Johnson BP, Beebe DJ and Virumbrales-Muñoz M: Evaluation of PEG-based hydrogel influence on estrogen receptor driven responses in MCF7 breast cancer cells. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 5:6089–6098. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bellis SL: Advantages of RGD peptides for directing cell association with biomaterials. Biomaterials. 32:4205–4210. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang F, Li Y, Shen Y, Wang A, Wang S and Xie T: The functions and applications of RGD in tumor therapy and tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci. 14:13447–13462. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sawicki LA, Ovadia EM, Pradhan L, Cowart JE, Ross KE, Wu CH and Kloxin AM: Tunable synthetic extracellular matrices to investigate breast cancer response to biophysical and biochemical cues. APL Bioeng. 3:0161012019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schmid R, Schmidt SK, Hazur J, Detsch R, Maurer E, Boccaccini AR, Hauptstein J, Teßmar J, Blunk T, Schrüfer S, et al: Comparison of hydrogels for the development of well-defined 3D cancer models of breast cancer and melanoma. Cancers (Basel). 12:23202020. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Feng S, Duan X, Lo PK, Liu S, Liu X, Chen H and Wang Q: Expansion of breast cancer stem cells with fibrous scaffolds. Integr Biol (Camb). 5:768–777. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zhang YS, Duchamp M, Oklu R, Ellisen LW, Langer R and Khademhosseini A: Bioprinting the cancer microenvironment. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2:1710–1721. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Balachander GM, Balaji SA, Rangarajan A and Chatterjee K: Enhanced metastatic potential in a 3D tissue scaffold toward a comprehensive in vitro model for breast cancer metastasis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 7:27810–27822. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Guiro K, Patel SA, Greco SJ, Rameshwar P and Arinzeh TL: Investigating breast cancer cell behavior using tissue engineering scaffolds. PLoS One. 10:e01187242015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rijal G, Bathula C and Li W: Application of synthetic polymeric scaffolds in breast cancer 3D tissue cultures and animal tumor models. Int J Biomater. 2017:80748902017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kačarević ŽP, Rider PM, Alkildani S, Retnasingh S, Smeets R, Jung O, Ivanišević Z and Barbeck M: An introduction to 3D bioprinting: Possibilities, challenges and future aspects. Materials (Basel). 11:21992018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Cha rbe N, McCa r ron PA and Tambuwala MM: Three-dimensional bio-printing: A new frontier in oncology research. World J Clin Oncol. 8:21–36. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Derby B: Bioprinting: Inkjet printing proteins and hybrid cell-containing materials and structures. J Mater Chem. 18:5717–5721. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Negro A, Cherbuin T and Lutolf MP: 3D inkjet printing of complex, cell-laden hydrogel structures. Sci Rep. 8:170992018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Panwar A and Tan LP: Current status of bioinks for micro-extrusion-based 3D bioprinting. Molecules. 21:6852016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Koch L, Gruene M, Unger C and Chichkov B: Laser assisted cell printing. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 14:91–97. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Mondschein RJ, Kanitkar A, Williams CB, Verbridge SS and Long TE: Polymer structure-property requirements for stereo-lithographic 3D printing of soft tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials. 140:170–188. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cui X, Boland T, D'Lima DD and Lotz MK: Thermal inkjet printing in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Recent Pat Drug Deliv Formul. 6:149–155. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cheng E, Yu H, Ahmadi A and Cheung KC: Investigation of the hydrodynamic response of cells in drop on demand piezoelectric inkjet nozzles. Biofabrication. 8:0150082016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yi HG, Lee H and Cho DW: 3D printing of organs-on-chips. Bioengineering (Basel). 4:102017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bishop ES, Mostafa S, Pakvasa M, Luu HH, Lee MJ, Wolf JM, Ameer GA, He TC and Reid RR: 3-D bioprinting technologies in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: Current and future trends. Genes Dis. 4:185–195. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chang R, Nam J and Sun W: Effects of dispensing pressure and nozzle diameter on cell survival from solid freeform fabrication-based direct cell writing. Tissue Eng Part A. 14:41–48. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Murphy SV and Atala A: 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol. 32:773–785. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Park JH, Jang J, Lee JS and Cho DW: Three-dimensional printing of tissue/organ analogues containing living cells. Ann Biomed Eng. 45:180–194. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sears NA and Seshadri DR: A review of three-dimensional printing in tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 22:298–310. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Raman R, Bhaduri B, Mir M, Shkumatov A, Lee MK, Popescu G, Kong H and Bashir R: High-resolution projection microstereolithography for patterning of neovasculature. Adv Healthc Mater. 5:610–619. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lin H, Zhang D, Alexander PG, Yang G, Tan J, Cheng AW and Tuan RS: Application of visible light-based projection stereo-lithography for live cell-scaffold fabrication with designed architecture. Biomaterials. 34:331–339. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Axpe E and Oyen ML: Applications of alginate-based bioinks in 3D bioprinting. Int J Mol Sci. 17:19762016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Nerger BA, Brun PT and Nelson CM: Microextrusion printing cell-laden networks of type I collagen with patterned fiber alignment and geometry. Soft Matter. 15:5728–5738. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Włodarczyk-Biegun MK and del Campo A: 3D bioprinting of structural proteins. Biomaterials. 134:180–201. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Albritton JL and Miller JS: 3D bioprinting: Improving in vitro models of metastasis with heterogeneous tumor microenvironments. Dis Model Mech. 10:3–14. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mancha Sánchez E, Gómez-Blanco JC, López Nieto E, Casado JG, Macías-García A, Díaz Díez MA, Carrasco-Amador JP, Torrejón Martín D, Sánchez-Margallo FM and Pagador JB: Hydrogels for bioprinting: A systematic review of hydrogels synthesis, bioprinting parameters, and bioprinted structures behavior. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 8:7762020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Moore CA, Shah NN, Smith CP and Rameshwar P: 3D bioprinting and stem cells. Methods Mol Biol. 1842:93–103. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mollica PA, Booth-Creech EN, Reid JA, Zamponi M, Sullivan SM, Palmer XL, Sachs PC and Bruno RD: 3D bioprinted mammary organoids and tumoroids in human mammary derived ECM hydrogels. Acta Biomater. 95:201–213. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |