Human‑made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced‑oscillation and voltage‑gated ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress and DNA damage (Review)

Goodman EM, Greenebaum B and Marron MT: Effects of electromagnetic fields on molecules and cells. Int Rev Cytol. 158:279–338. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Santini MT, Ferrante A, Rainaldi G, Indovina P and Indovina PL: Extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic fields and apoptosis: A review. Int J Radiat Biol. 81:1–11. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Phillips JL, Singh NP and Lai H: Electromagnetic fields and DNA damage. Pathophysiology. 16:79–88. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Panagopoulos DJ: Comparing DNA damage induced by mobile telephony and other types of man-made electromagnetic fields. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 781:53–62. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Delgado JMR: Biological effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields. J Bioelectricity. 4:75–92. 1985. View Article : Google Scholar

Garaj-Vrhovac V, Horvat D and Koren Z: The effect of microwave radiation on the cell genome. Mutat Res. 243:87–93. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Garaj-Vrhovac V, Horvat D and Koren Z: The relationship between colony-forming ability, chromosome aberrations and incidence of micronuclei in V79 Chinese hamster cells exposed to microwave radiation. Mutat Res. 263:143–149. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Garaj-Vrhovac V, Fucić A and Horvat D: The correlation between the frequency of micronuclei and specific chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes exposed to microwave radiation in vitro. Mutat Res. 281:181–186. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Ma TH and Chu KC: Effect of the extremely low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic field (EMF) on developing embryos of the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster L.). Mutat Res. 303:35–39. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Sarkar S, Ali S and Behari J: Effect of low power microwave on the mouse genome: A direct DNA analysis. Mutat Res. 320:141–147. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Lai H and Singh NP: Acute low-intensity microwave exposure increases DNA single-strand breaks in rat brain cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 16:207–210. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Lai H and Singh NP: Single- and double-strand DNA breaks in rat brain cells after acute exposure to radiofrequency electro-magnetic radiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 69:513–521. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Lai H and Singh NP: Acute exposure to a 60 Hz magnetic field increases DNA strand breaks in rat brain cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 18:156–165. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Svedenstål BM, Johanson KJ and Mild KH: DNA damage induced in brain cells of CBA mice exposed to magnetic fields. In Vivo. 13:551–552. 1999.

Koana T, Okada MO, Takashima Y, Ikehata M and Miyakoshi J: Involvement of eddy currents in the mutagenicity of ELF magnetic fields. Mutat Res. 476:55–62. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Ivancsits S, Diem E, Pilger A, Rüdiger HW and Jahn O: Induction of DNA strand breaks by intermittent exposure to extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic fields in human diploid fibroblasts. Mutat Res. 519:1–13. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Ivancsits S, Diem E, Jahn O and Rüdiger HW: Intermittent extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields cause DNA damage in a dose-dependent way. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 76:431–436. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Winker R, Ivancsits S, Pilger A, Adlkofer F and Rüdiger HW: Chromosomal damage in human diploid fibroblasts by intermittent exposure to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields. Mutat Res. 585:43–49. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Diem E, Schwarz C, Adlkofer F, Jahn O and Rüdiger H: Non-thermal DNA breakage by mobile-phone radiation (1800 MHz) in human fibroblasts and in transformed GFSH-R17 rat granulosa cells in vitro. Mutat Res. 583:178–183. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Mausset-Bonnefont AL, Hirbec H, Bonnefont X, Privat A, Vignon J and de Sèze R: Acute exposure to GSM 900-MHz electromagnetic fields induces glial reactivity and biochemical modifications in the rat brain. Neurobiol Dis. 17:445–454. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Ji S, Oh E, Sul D, Choi JW, Park H and Lee E: DNA damage of lymphocytes in volunteers after 4 h use of mobile phone. J Prev Med Public Health. 37:373–380. 2004.PubMed/NCBI

Hong R, Zhang Y, Liu Y and Weng EQ: Effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on DNA of testicular cells and sperm chromatin structure in mice. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 23:414–417. 2005.In Chinese.

Belyaev IY, Hillert L, Protopopova M, Tamm C, Malmgren LO, Persson BR, Selivanova G and Harms-Ringdahl M: 915 MHz microwaves and 50 Hz magnetic field affect chromatin conformation and 53BP1 foci in human lymphocytes from hypersensitive and healthy persons. Bioelectromagnetics. 26:173–184. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Markovà E, Hillert L, Malmgren L, Persson BR and Belyaev IY: Microwaves from GSM mobile telephones affect 53BP1 and gamma-H2AX foci in human lymphocytes from hypersensitive and healthy persons. Environ Health Perspect. 113:1172–1177. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Aitken RJ, Bennetts LE, Sawyer D, Wiklendt AM and King BV: Impact of radio frequency electromagnetic radiation on DNA integrity in the male germline. Int J Androl. 28:171–179. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Nikolova T, Czyz J, Rolletschek A, Blyszczuk P, Fuchs J, Jovtchev G, Schuderer J, Kuster N and Wobus AM: Electromagnetic fields affect transcript levels of apoptosis-related genes in embryonic stem cell-derived neural progenitor cells. FASEB J. 19:1686–1688. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Zhang DY, Xu ZP, Chiang H, Lu DQ and Zeng QL: Effects of GSM 1800 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on DNA damage in Chinese hamster lung cells. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 40:149–152. 2006.In Chinese. PubMed/NCBI

Lixia S, Yao K, Kaijun W, Deqiang L, Huajun H, Xiangwei G, Baohong W, Wei Z, Jianling L and Wei W: Effects of 1.8 GHz radiofrequency field on DNA damage and expression of heat shock protein 70 in human lens epithelial cells. Mutat Res. 602:135–142. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Ferreira AR, Knakievicz T, Pasquali MA, Gelain DP, Dal-Pizzol F, Fernández CE, de Salles AA, Ferreira HB and Moreira JC: Ultra high frequency-electromagnetic field irradiation during pregnancy leads to an increase in erythrocytes micronuclei incidence in rat offspring. Life Sci. 80:43–50. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Panagopoulos DJ, Chavdoula ED, Nezis IP and Margaritis LH: Cell death induced by GSM 900-MHz and DCS 1800-MHz mobile telephony radiation. Mutat Res. 626:69–78. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

Yan JG, Agresti M, Bruce T, Yan YH, Granlund A and Matloub HS: Effects of cellular phone emissions on sperm motility in rats. Fertil Steril. 88:957–964. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Yao K, Wu W, Wang K, Ni S, Ye P, Yu Y, Ye J and Sun L: Electromagnetic noise inhibits radiofrequency radiation-induced DNA damage and reactive oxygen species increase in human lens epithelial cells. Mol Vis. 14:964–969. 2008.PubMed/NCBI

Yadav AS and Sharma MK: Increased frequency of micronucleated exfoliated cells among humans exposed in vivo to mobile telephone radiations. Mutat Res. 650:175–180. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Sokolovic D, Djindjic B, Nikolic J, Bjelakovic G, Pavlovic D, Kocic G, Krstic D, Cvetkovic T and Pavlovic V: Melatonin reduces oxidative stress induced by chronic exposure of microwave radiation from mobile phones in rat brain. J Radiat Res. 49:579–586. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Lee KS, Choi JS, Hong SY, Son TH and Yu K: Mobile phone electromagnetic radiation activates MAPK signaling and regulates viability in Drosophila. Bioelectromagnetics. 29:371–379. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

De Iuliis GN, Newey RJ, King BV and Aitken RJ: Mobile phone radiation induces reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human spermatozoa in vitro. PLoS One. 4:e64462009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Agarwal A, Desai NR, Makker K, Varghese A, Mouradi R, Sabanegh E and Sharma R: Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves (RF-EMW) from cellular phones on human ejaculated semen: An in vitro pilot study. Fertil Steril. 92:1318–1325. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

Mailankot M, Kunnath AP, Jayalekshmi H, Koduru B and Valsalan R: Radio frequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) from GSM (0.9/1.8 GHz) mobile phones induces oxidative stress and reduces sperm motility in rats. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 64:561–565. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

Luukkonen J, Hakulinen P, Mäki-Paakkanen J, Juutilainen J and Naarala J: Enhancement of chemically induced reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells by 872 MHz radiofrequency radiation. Mutat Res. 662:54–58. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Panagopoulos DJ, Chavdoula ED and Margaritis LH: Bioeffects of mobile telephony radiation in relation to its intensity or distance from the antenna. Int J Radiat Biol. 86:345–357. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Chavdoula ED, Panagopoulos DJ and Margaritis LH: Comparison of biological effects between continuous and intermittent exposure to GSM-900-MHz mobile phone radiation. Detection of apoptotic cell death features Mutat Res. 700:51–61. 2010.

Guler G, Tomruk A, Ozgur E and Seyhan N: The effect of radio-frequency radiation on DNA and lipid damage in non-pregnant and pregnant rabbits and their newborns. Gen Physiol Biophys. 29:59–66. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Tomruk A, Guler G and Dincel AS: The influence of 1800 MHz GSM-like signals on hepatic oxidative DNA and lipid damage in nonpregnant, pregnant, and newly born rabbits. Cell Biochem Biophys. 56:39–47. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

Franzellitti S, Valbonesi P, Ciancaglini N, Biondi C, Contin A, Bersani F and Fabbri E: Transient DNA damage induced by high-frequency electromagnetic fields (GSM 1.8 GHz) in the human trophoblast HTR-8/SVneo cell line evaluated with the alkaline comet assay. Mutat Res. 683:35–42. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

Campisi A, Gulino M, Acquaviva R, Bellia P, Raciti G, Grasso R, Musumeci F, Vanella A and Triglia A: Reactive oxygen species levels and DNA fragmentation on astrocytes in primary culture after acute exposure to low intensity microwave electromagnetic field. Neurosci Lett. 473:52–55. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Panagopoulos DJ: Effect of microwave exposure on the ovarian development of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Biochem Biophys. 63:121–132. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Panagopoulos DJ, Karabarbounis A and Lioliousis C: ELF alternating magnetic field decreases reproduction by DNA damage induction. Cell Biochem Biophys. 67:703–716. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Liu C, Gao P, Xu SC, Wang Y, Chen CH, He MD, Yu ZP, Zhang L and Zhou Z: Mobile phone radiation induces mode-dependent DNA damage in a mouse spermatocyte-derived cell line: A protective role of melatonin. Int J Radiat Biol. 89:993–1001. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Pesnya DS and Romanovsky AV: Comparison of cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of plutonium-239 alpha particles and mobile phone GSM 900 radiation in the Allium cepa test. Mutat Res. 750:27–33. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

Mihai CT, Rotinberg P, Brinza F and Vochita G: Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields cause DNA strand breaks in normal cells. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 12:152014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Daroit NB, Visioli F, Magnusson AS, Vieira GR and Rados PV: Cell phone radiation effects on cytogenetic abnormalities of oral mucosal cells. Braz Oral Res. 29:1–8. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Banerjee S, Singh NN, Sreedhar G and Mukherjee S: Analysis of the genotoxic effects of mobile phone radiation using buccal micronucleus assay: A comparative evaluation. J Clin Diagn Res. 10:ZC82–ZC85. 2016.PubMed/NCBI

D'Silva MH, Swer RT, Anbalagan J and Rajesh B: Effect of radiofrequency radiation emitted from 2G and 3G cell phone on developing liver of chick embryo-a comparative study. J Clin Diagn Res. 11:AC05–AC09. 2017.

Panagopoulos DJ: Chromosome damage in human cells induced by UMTS mobile telephony radiation. Gen Physiol Biophys. 38:445–454. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Panagopoulos DJ: Comparing chromosome damage induced by mobile telephony radiation and a high caffeine dose: Effect of combination and exposure duration. Gen Physiol Biophys. 39:531–544. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Magras IN and Xenos TD: RF radiation-induced changes in the prenatal development of mice. Bioelectromagnetics. 18:455–461. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Panagopoulos DJ, Karabarbounis A and Margaritis LH: Effect of GSM 900-MHz mobile phone radiation on the reproductive capacity of Drosophila melanogaster. Electromagn Biol Med. 23:29–43. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar

Panagopoulos DJ, Chavdoula ED, Karabarbounis A and Margaritis LH: Comparison of bioactivity between GSM 900 MHz and DCS 1800 MHz mobile telephony radiation. Electromagn Biol Med. 26:33–44. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Wdowiak A, Wdowiak L and Wiktor H: Evaluation of the effect of using mobile phones on male fertility. Ann Agric Environ Med. 14:169–172. 2007.PubMed/NCBI

Agarwal A, Deepinder F, Sharma RK, Ranga G and Li J: Effect of cell phone usage on semen analysis in men attending infertility clinic: An observational study. Fertil Steril. 89:124–128. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

Batellier F, Couty I, Picard D and Brillard JP: Effects of exposing chicken eggs to a cell phone in 'call' position over the entire incubation period. Theriogenology. 69:737–745. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Gul A, Celebi H and Uğraş S: The effects of microwave emitted by cellular phones on ovarian follicles in rats. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 280:729–733. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Sharma VP and Kumar NR: Changes in honey bee behaviour and biology under the influence of cell phone radiations. Curr Sci. 98:1376–1378. 2010.

La Vignera S, Condorelli RA, Vicardi E, D'Agata R and Calogero AE: Effects of the exposure to mobile phones on male reproduction: A review of the literature. J Androl. 33:350–356. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

Balmori A: Possible effects of electromagnetic fields from phone masts on a population of white stork (Ciconia ciconia). Electromagn Biol Med. 24:109–119. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar

Balmori A and Hallberg O: The urban decline of the house sparrow (Passer domesticus): A possible link with electromagnetic radiation. Electromagn Biol Med. 26:141–151. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Everaert J and Bauwens D: A possible effect of electromagnetic radiation from mobile phone base stations on the number of breeding house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Electromagn Biol Med. 26:63–72. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Bacandritsos N, Granato A, Budge G, Papanastasiou I, Roinioti E, Caldon M, Falcaro C, Gallina A and Mutinelli F: Sudden deaths and colony population decline in Greek honey bee colonies. J Invertebr Pathol. 105:335–340. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Cucurachi S, Tamis WL, Vijver MG, Peijnenburg WJ, Bolte JF and de Snoo GR: A review of the ecological effects of radio-frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF). Environ Int. 51:116–140. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

Balmori A: The incidence of electromagnetic pollution on the amphibian decline: Is this an important piece of the puzzle? Toxicol Environ Chem. 88:287–299. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

Balmori A: Mobile phone mast effects on common frog (Rana temporaria) tadpoles: The city turned into a laboratory. Electromagn Biol Med. 29:31–35. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Wertheimer N and Leeper E: Electrical wiring configurations and childhood cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 109:273–284. 1979. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Savitz DA, Wachtel H, Barnes F, John EM and Tvrdik JG: Case-control study of childhood cancer and exposure to 60-Hz magnetic fields. Am J Epidemiol. 128:21–38. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Coleman MP, Bell CM, Taylor HL and Primic-Zakelj M: Leukaemia and residence near electricity transmission equipment: A case-control study. Br J Cancer. 60:793–798. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Feychting M and Ahlbom A: Magnetic fields and cancer in children residing near Swedish high-voltage power lines. Am J Epidemiol. 138:467–481. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Feychting M and Ahlbom A: Magnetic fields, leukemia, and central nervous system tumors in Swedish adults residing near high-voltage power lines. Epidemiology. 5:501–509. 1994.PubMed/NCBI

Feychting M and Ahlbom A: Childhood leukemia and residential exposure to weak extremely low frequency magnetic fields. Environ Health Perspect. 103(Suppl 2): S59–S62. 1995.

Coghill RW, Steward J and Philips A: Extra low frequency electric and magnetic fields in the bed place of children diagnosed with leukaemia: A case-control study. Eur J Cancer Prev. 5:153–158. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Ahlbom A, Day N, Feychting M, Roman E, Skinner J, Dockerty J, Linet M, McBride M, Michaelis J, Olsen JH, et al: A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia. Br J Cancer. 83:692–698. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Greenland S, Sheppard AR, Kaune WT, Poole C and Kelsh MA: A pooled analysis of magnetic fields, wire codes, and childhood leukemia. Childhood leukemia-EMF study group Epidemiology. 11:624–634. 2000.

Draper G, Vincent T, Kroll ME and Swanson J: Childhood cancer in relation to distance from high voltage power lines in England and Wales: A case-control study. BMJ. 330:12902005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Kheifets L, Ahlbom A, Crespi CM, Draper G, Hagihara J, Lowenthal RM, Mezei G, Oksuzyan S, Schüz J, Swanson J, et al: Pooled analysis of recent studies on magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia. Br J Cancer. 103:1128–1135. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Hallberg O and Johansson O: Melanoma incidence and frequency modulation (FM) broadcasting. Arch Environ Health. 57:32–40. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Gulati S, Yadav A, Kumar N, Kanupriya, Aggarwal NK, Kumar R and Gupta R: Effect of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms on genetic damage in humans populations exposed to radiation from mobile towers. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 70:615–625. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

Zothansiama, Zosangzuali M, Lalramdinpuii M and Jagetia GC: Impact of radiofrequency radiation on DNA damage and anti-oxidants in peripheral blood lymphocytes of humans residing in the vicinity of mobile phone base stations. Electromagn Biol Med. 36:295–305. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar

Hardell L, Carlberg M, Söderqvist F, Mild KH and Morgan LL: Long-term use of cellular phones and brain tumours: Increased risk associated with use for > or =10 years. Occup Environ Med. 64:626–632. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Hardell L, Carlberg M and Hansson Mild K: Epidemiological evidence for an association between use of wireless phones and tumor diseases. Pathophysiology. 16:113–122. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Khurana VG, Teo C, Kundi M, Hardell L and Carlberg M: Cell phones and brain tumors: A review including the long-term epidemiologic data. Surg Neurol. 72:205–214. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Hardell L and Carlberg M: Mobile phones, cordless phones and the risk for brain tumours. Int J Oncol. 35:5–17. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Hardell L, Carlberg M, Söderqvist F and Mild KH: Pooled analysis of case-control studies on acoustic neuroma diagnosed 1997-2003 and 2007-2009 and use of mobile and cordless phones. Int J Oncol. 43:1036–1044. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Hardell L, Carlberg M, Söderqvist F and Mild KH: Case-control study of the association between malignant brain tumours diagnosed between 2007 and 2009 and mobile and cordless phone use. Int J Oncol. 43:1833–1845. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Hardell L, Carlberg M and Hansson Mild K: Use of mobile phones and cordless phones is associated with increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma. Pathophysiology. 20:85–110. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

Wang Y and Guo X: Meta-analysis of association between mobile phone use and glioma risk. J Cancer Res Ther. 12(Suppl): C298–C300. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

Carlberg M and Hardell L: Evaluation of mobile phone and cordless phone use and glioma risk using the bradford hill viewpoints from 1965 on association or causation. Biomed Res Int. 2017:92184862017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Hardell L: Effects of mobile phones on children's and adolescents' health: A commentary. Child Dev. 89:137–140. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar

Momoli F, Siemiatycki J, McBride ML, Parent MÉ, Richardson L, Bedard D, Platt R, Vrijheid M, Cardis E and Krewski D: Probabilistic multiple-bias modelling applied to the Canadian data from the INTERPHONE study of mobile phone use and risk of glioma, meningioma, acoustic neuroma, and parotid gland tumors. Am J Epidemiol. 186:885–893. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Miller AB, Morgan LL, Udasin I and Davis DL: Cancer epidemiology update following the 2011 IARC evaluation of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (Monograph 102). Environ Res. 167:673–683. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Miller AB, Sears ME, Morgan LL, Davis DL, Hardell L, Oremus M and Soskolne CL: Risks to health and well-being from radio-frequency radiation emitted by cell phones and other wireless devices. Front Public Health. 7:2232019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Santini R, Santini P, Danze JM, Le Ruz P and Seigne M: Study of the health of people living in the vicinity of mobile phone base stations: I. Influences of distance and sex Pathol Biol. 50:369–373. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar

Navarro A, Garcia JS, Portoles M and Gómez-Perretta G: The microwave syndrome: A preliminary study in Spain. Electromagn Biol Med. 22:161–169. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar

Salama OE and Abou El Naga RM: Cellular phones: Are they detrimental? J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 79:197–223. 2004.

Hutter HP, Moshammer H, Wallner P and Kundi M: Subjective symptoms, sleeping problems, and cognitive performance in subjects living near mobile phone base stations. Occup Environ Med. 63:307–313. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Abdel-Rassoul G, El-Fateh OA, Salem MA, Michael A, Farahat F, El-Batanouny M and Salem E: Neurobehavioral effects among inhabitants around mobile phone base stations. Neurotoxicology. 28:434–440. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

Blettner M, Schlehofer B, Breckenkamp J, Kowall B, Schmiedel S, Reis U, Potthoff P, Schüz J and Berg-Beckhoff G: Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: Phase 1 of a population-based, cross-sectional study in Germany. Occup Environ Med. 66:118–123. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

Viel JF, Clerc S, Barrera C, Rymzhanova R, Moissonnier M, Hours M and Cardis E: Residential exposure to radiofrequency fields from mobile phone base stations, and broadcast transmitters: A population-based survey with personal meter. Occup Environ Med. 66:550–556. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Kundi M and Hutter HP: Mobile phone base stations-effects on wellbeing and health. Pathophysiology. 16:123–135. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Shahbazi-Gahrouei D, Karbalae M, Moradi HA and Baradaran-Ghahfarokhi M: Health effects of living near mobile phone base transceiver station (BTS) antennae: A report from Isfahan, Iran. Electromagn Biol Med. 33:206–210. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

Irigaray P, Caccamo D and Belpomme D: Oxidative stress in electrohypersensitivity self-reporting patients: Results of a prospective in vivo investigation with comprehensive molecular analysis. Int J Mol Med. 42:1885–1898. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

Yakymenko I, Tsybulin O, Sidorik E, Henshel D, Kyrylenko O and Kyrylenko S: Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation. Electromagn Biol Med. 35:186–202. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

Tillmann T, Ernst H, Streckert J, Zhou Y, Taugner F, Hansen V and Dasenbrock C: Indication of cocarcinogenic potential of chronic UMTS-modulated radiofrequency exposure in an ethylnitrosourea mouse model. Int J Radiat Biol. 86:529–541. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Lerchl A, Klose M, Grote K, Wilhelm AF, Spathmann O, Fiedler T, Streckert J, Hansen V and Clemens M: Tumor promotion by exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below exposure limits for humans. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 459:585–590. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

National Toxicology Program: Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies in Sprague Dawley (Hsd:Sprague Dawley SD) rats exposed to whole-body radio frequency radiation at a frequency (900 MHz) and modulations (GSM and CDMA) used by cell phones. Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser: NTP-TR-595. 2018.

Smith-Roe SL, Wyde ME, Stout MD, Winters JW, Hobbs CA, Shepard KG, Green AS, Kissling GE, Shockley KR, Tice RR, et al: Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cell phone radiofrequency radiation in male and female rats and mice following subchronic exposure. Environ Mol Mutagen. 61:276–290. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar :

Falcioni L, Bua L, Tibaldi E, Lauriola M, De Angelis L, Gnudi F, Mandrioli D, Manservigi M, Manservisi F, Manzoli I, et al: Report of final results regarding brain and heart tumors in Sprague-Dawley rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM base station environmental emission. Environ Res. 165:496–503. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection: Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields (1 Hz to 100 kHz). Health Phys. 99:818–836. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection: Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 118:483–524. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

IARC: Non-ionizing radiation, part 1: Static and extremely low-frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields. 80. World Health Organization. IARC Press; Lyon: 2002

IARC: Non-Ionizing Radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields. 102. IARC Press; Lyon: 2013

Baan R, Grosse Y, Lauby-Secretan B, El Ghissassi F, Bouvard V, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Guha N, Islami F and Galichet L: Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Lancet Oncol. 12:624–626. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Verschaeve L: Misleading scientific papers on health effects from wireless communication devices. Microwave Effects on DNA and Proteins. Geddes CD: Springer; Cham: pp. 159–233. 2017, View Article : Google Scholar

Panagopoulos DJ, Johansson O and Carlo GL: Real versus simulated mobile phone exposures in experimental studies. Biomed Res Int. 2015:6070532015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Panagopoulos DJ: Mobile telephony radiation effects on insect ovarian cells. The necessity for real exposures bioactivity assessment The key role of polarization, and the 'ion forced-oscillation mechanism'. Microwave Effects on DNA and Proteins. Geddes CD: Springer; Cham: pp. 1–48. 2017

Manna D and Ghosh R: Effect of radiofrequency radiation in cultured mammalian cells: A review. Electromagn Biol Med. 35:265–301. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Leach V, Weller S and Redmayne M: A novel database of bio-effects from non-ionizing radiation. Rev Environ Health. 33:273–280. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Karipidis K, Mate R, Urban D, Tinker R and Wood A: 5G mobile networks and health-a state-of-the-science review of the research into low-level RF fields above 6 GHz. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 31:585–605. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Hardell L and Nyberg R: Appeals that matter or not on a moratorium on the deployment of the fifth generation, 5G, for microwave radiation. Mol Clin Oncol. 12:247–257. 2020.PubMed/NCBI

Hardell L and Carlberg M: Health risks from radiofrequency radiation, including 5G, should be assessed by experts with no conflicts of interest. Oncol Lett. 20:152020.PubMed/NCBI

Metaxas AC: Microwave heating. Power Eng. 5:237–247. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar

Panagopoulos DJ: Comments on Pall's 'Millimeter (MM) wave and microwave frequency radiation produce deeply penetrating effects: The biology and the physics'. Rev Environ Health. Jul 12–2021, https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2021-0090. View Article : Google Scholar

Ames BN: Endogenous DNA damage as related to cancer and aging. Mutat Res. 214:41–46. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Lieber MR: Pathological and physiological double-strand breaks: Roles in cancer, aging, and the immune system. Am J Pathol. 153:1323–1332. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Helleday T, Loc J, van Gentd DC and Engelward BP: DNA double-strand break repair: From mechanistic understanding to cancer treatment. DNA Repair (Amst). 6:923–935. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

Lahtz C and Pfeifer GP: Epigenetic changes of DNA repair genes in cancer. J Mol Cell Biol. 3:51–58. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Yao Y and Dai W: Genomic instability and cancer. J Carcinog Mutagen. 5:10001652014.PubMed/NCBI

Bernstein C, Prasad AR, Nfonsam V and Bernstein H: DNA damage, DNA repair and cancer. New Research Directions in DNA Repair. Clarc C: InTech; Rijeka: pp. 413–465. 2013

Basu AK: DNA damage, mutagenesis and cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 19:9702018. View Article : Google Scholar :

von Zglinicki T, Saretzki G, Ladhoff J, d'Adda di Fagagna F and Jackson SP: Human cell senescence as a DNA damage response. Mech Ageing Dev. 126:111–117. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar

Shah DJ, Sachs RK and Wilson DJ: Radiation-induced cancer: A modern view. Br J Radiol. 85:e1166–e1173. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Rodgers K and McVey M: Error-prone repair of DNA double-strand breaks. J Cell Physiol. 231:15–24. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

Nadler DL and Zurbenko IG: Estimating cancer latency times using a weibull model. Adv Epidemiol. 2014:7467692014. View Article : Google Scholar

Francis G: Ionization Phenomena in Gases. Butterworths Scientific Publications; London: 1960

Gomer R: Field Emission and Field Ionization. Harvard University Press; Cambridge: 1961

Panagopoulos DJ, Johansson O and Carlo GL: Polarization: A key difference between man-made and natural electromagnetic fields, in regard to biological activity. Sci Rep. 5:149142015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Panagopoulos DJ, Messini N, Karabarbounis A, Filippetis AL and Margaritis LH: A mechanism for action of oscillating electric fields on cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 272:634–640. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Panagopoulos DJ, Karabarbounis A and Margaritis LH: Mechanism for action of electromagnetic fields on cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 298:95–102. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Panagopoulos DJ, Balmori A and Chrousos GP: On the biophysical mechanism of sensing upcoming earthquakes by animals. Sci Total Environ. 717:1369892020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K and Walter P: Molecular Biology of the Cell. Garland Publishing, Inc; New York: 1994

Stryer L: Biochemistry. 4th edition. Freeman WH: Freeman and Company; New York, NY: 1995

Halgamuge MN and Abeyrathne CD: Behavior of charged particles in a biological cell exposed to AC-DC electromagnetic fields. Environ Eng Sci. 28:1–10. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar

Panagopoulos DJ and Karabarbounis A: Comments on study of charged particle's behavior in a biological cell exposed to AC-DC electromagnetic fields, and on comparison between two models of interaction between electric and magnetic fields and proteins in cell membranes. Environ Eng Sci. 28:749–751. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

Bawin SM, Kaczmarek LK and Adey WR: Effects of modulated VHF fields, on the central nervous system. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 247:74–81. 1975. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Bawin SM, Adey WR and Sabbot IM: Ionic factors in release of ⁴⁵Ca²⁺ from chicken cerebral tissue by electromagnetic fields. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 75:6314–6318. 1978. View Article : Google Scholar

Blackman CF, Benane SG, Elder JA, House DE, Lampe JA and Faulk JM: Induction of calcium-ion efflux from brain tissue by radiofrequency radiation: Effect of sample number and modulation frequency on the power density window. Bioelectromagnetics. 1:35–43. 1980. View Article : Google Scholar

Frei M, Jauchem J and Heinmets F: Physiological effects of 2.8 GHz radio-frequency radiation: A comparison of pulsed and continuous-wave radiation. J Microw Power Electromagn Energy. 23:85–93. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Bolshakov MA and Alekseev SI: Bursting responses of Lymnea neurons to microwave radiation. Bioelectromagnetics. 13:119–129. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Penafiel LM, Litovitz T, Krause D, Desta A and Mullins JM: Role of modulation on the effect of microwaves on ornithine decarboxylase activity in L929 cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 18:132–141. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Huber R, Treyer V, Borbély AA, Schuderer J, Gottselig JM, Landolt HP, Werth E, Berthold T, Kuster N, Buck A and Achermann P: Electromagnetic fields, such as those from mobile phones, alter regional cerebral blood flow and sleep and waking EEG. J Sleep Res. 11:289–295. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Höytö A, Luukkonen J, Juutilainen J and Naarala J: Proliferation, oxidative stress and cell death in cells exposed to 872 MHz radio-frequency radiation and oxidants. Radiat Res. 170:235–243. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

Mohammed HS, Fahmy HM, Radwan NM and Elsayed AA: Non-thermal continuous and modulated electromagnetic radiation fields effects on sleep EEG of rats. J Adv Res. 4:181–187. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Noda M, Ikeda T, Kayano T, Suzuki H, Takeshima H, Kurasaki M, Takahashi H and Numa S: Existence of distinct sodium channel messenger RNAs in rat brain. Nature. 320:188–192. 1986. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Liman ER, Hess P, Weaver F and Koren G: Voltage-sensing residues in the S4 region of a mammalian K⁺ channel. Nature. 353:752–756. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Tombola F, Pathak MM and Isacoff EY: How does voltage open an ion channel? Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 22:23–52. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Schmidt WF and Thomas CG: More precise model of α-helix and transmembrane α-helical peptide backbone structure. J Biophy Chem. 3:295–303. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

Miller C: An overview of the potassium channel family. Genome Biol. 1:REVIEWS00042000. View Article : Google Scholar

Zhang XC, Yang H, Liu Z and Sun F: Thermodynamics of voltage-gated ion channels. Biophys Rep. 4:300–319. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar :

DeCoursey TE: Interactions between NADPH oxidase and voltage-gated proton channels: Why electron transport depends on proton transport. FEBS Lett. 555:57–61. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Seredenina T, Demaurex N and Krause KH: Voltage-gated proton channels as novel drug targets: From NADPH oxidase regulation to sperm biology. Antioxid Redox Sign. 23:490–513. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

Panagopoulos DJ, Johansson O and Carlo GL: Evaluation of specific absorption rate as a dosimetric quantity for electromagnetic fields bioeffects. PLoS One. 8:e626632013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Creasey WA and Goldberg RB: A new twist on an old mechanism for EMF bioeffects? EMF Health Rep. 9:1–11. 2001.

Belyaev IY: Non-thermal biological effects of microwaves. Microw Rev. 11:13–29. 2005.

Zhou R, Xiong Y, Xing G, Sun L and Ma J: ZiFi: Wireless LAN discovery via ZigBee interference signatures. MobiCom'10. In: September 20-24; Chicago, Illinois, USA. 2010 Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking; View Article : Google Scholar

Piacentini R, Ripoli C, Mezzogori D, Azzena GB and Grassi C: Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields promote in vitro neurogenesis via upregulation of Ca(v)1-channel activity. J Cell Physiol. 215:129–139. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

Cecchetto C, Maschietto M, Boccaccio P and Vassanelli S: Electromagnetic field affects the voltage-dependent potassium channel Kv1.3. Electromagn Biol Med. 39:316–322. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Zheng Y, Xia P, Dong L, Tian L and Xiong C: Effects of modulation on sodium and potassium channel currents by extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields stimulation on hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells. Electromagn Biol Med. 40:274–285. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Batcioglu K, Uyumlu AB, Satilmis B, Yildirim B, Yucel N, Demirtas H, Onkal R, Guzel RM and Djamgoz MB: Oxidative stress in the in vivo DMBA rat model of breast cancer: Suppression by a voltage-gated sodium channel inhibitor (RS100642). Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 111:137–141. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

Ramírez A, Vázquez-Sánchez AY, Carrión-Robalino N and Camacho J: Ion channels and oxidative stress as a potential link for the diagnosis or treatment of liver diseases. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2016:39287142016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

O'Hare Doig RL, Chiha W, Giacci MK, Yates NJ, Bartlett CA, Smith NM, Hodgetts SI, Harvey AR and Fitzgerald M: Specific ion channels contribute to key elements of pathology during secondary degeneration following neurotrauma. BMC Neurosci. 18:622017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Akbarali HI: Oxidative stress and ion channels. Systems Biology of Free Radicals and Antioxidants. Lahers I: Springer; Berlin, Heidelberg: pp. 355–373. 2014, View Article : Google Scholar

Kourie JI: Interaction of reactive oxygen species with ion transport mechanisms. Am J Physiol. 275:C1–C24. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Lushchak VI: Free radicals, reactive oxygen species, oxidative stress and its classification. Chem Biol Interact. 224:164–175. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Pacher P, Beckman JS and Liaudet L: Nitric oxide and peroxynitrite in health and disease. Physiol Rev. 87:315–424. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Valko M, Leibfritz D, Moncol J, Cronin MT, Mazur M and Telser J: Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 39:44–84. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

Halliwell B: Biochemistry of oxidative stress. Biochem Soc Trans. 35:1147–1150. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Balasubramanian B, Pogozelski WK and Tullius TD: DNA strand breaking by the hydroxyl radical is governed by the accessible surface areas of the hydrogen atoms of the DNA backbone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:9738–9743. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Cadet J, Delatour T, Douki T, Gasparutto D, Pouget JP, Ravanat JL and Sauvaigo S: Hydroxyl radicals and DNA base damage. Mutat Res. 1424:9–21. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar

Cadet J and Wagner JR: DNA base damage by reactive oxygen species, oxidizing agents, and UV radiation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 5:a0125592013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Tsunoda M, Sakaue T, Naito S, Sunami T, Abe N, Ueno Y, Matsuda A and Takénaka A: Insights into the structures of DNA damaged by hydroxyl radical: Crystal structures of DNA duplexes containing 5-formyluracil. J Nucleic Acids. 2010:1072892010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Cooke MS, Evans MD, Dizdaroglu M and Lunec J: Oxidative DNA damage: Mechanisms, mutation, and disease. FASEB J. 17:1195–1214. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Barzilai A and Yamamoto K: DNA damage responses to oxidative stress. DNA Repair (Amst). 3:1109–1115. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar

Pall ML: Electromagnetic fields act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects. J Cell Mol Med. 17:958–965. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Liburdy RP: Calcium signaling in lymphocytes and ELF fields. Evidence for an electric field metric and a site of interaction involving the calcium ion channel. FEBS Lett. 301:53–59. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Walleczek J: Electromagnetic field effects on cells of the immune system: The role of calcium signaling. FASEB J. 6:3177–3185. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Brookes PS, Yoon Y, Robotham JL, Anders MW and Sheu SS: Calcium, ATP, and ROS: A mitochondrial love-hate triangle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 287:C817–C833. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Lang F, Föller M, Lang KS, Lang PA, Ritter M, Gulbins E, Vereninov A and Huber SM: Ion channels in cell proliferation and apoptotic cell death. J Membr Biol. 205:147–157. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Görlach A, Bertram K, Hudecova S and Krizanova O: Calcium and ROS: A mutual interplay. Redox Biol. 6:260–271. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Lombardi AA, Gibb AA, Arif E, Kolmetzky DW, Tomar D, Luongo TS, Jadiya P, Murray EK, Lorkiewicz PK, Hajnóczky G, et al: Mitochondrial calcium exchange links metabolism with the epigenome to control cellular differentiation. Nat Commun. 10:45092019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Lowe SW and Lin AW: Apoptosis in cancer. Carcinogenesis. 21:485–495. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Ikwegbue PC, Masamba P, Oyinloye BE and Kappo AP: Roles of heat shock proteins in apoptosis, oxidative stress, human inflammatory diseases, and cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 11:22017. View Article : Google Scholar

Becchetti A: Ion channels and transporters in cancer. 1. Ion channels and cell proliferation in cancer. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 301:C255–C265. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Gaasch JA, Geldenhuys WJ, Lockman PR, Allen DD and Van der Schyf CJ: Voltage-gated calcium channels provide an alternate route for iron uptake in neuronal cell cultures. Neurochem Res. 32:1686–1693. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Chattipakorn N, Kumfu S, Fucharoen S and Chattipakorn S: Calcium channels and iron uptake into the heart. World J Cardiol. 3:215–218. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Salsbury G, Cambridge EL, McIntyre Z, Arends MJ, Karp NA, Isherwood C, Shannon C, Hooks Y; Sanger Mouse Genetics Project; Ramirez-Solis R, et al: Disruption of the potassium channel regulatory subunit KCNE2 causes iron-deficient anemia. Exp Hematol. 42:1053–1058.e1. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

Gamaley I, Augsten K and Berg H: Electrostimulation of macrophage NADPH oxidase by modulated high-frequency electromagnetic fields. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg. 38:415–418. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar

Panday A, Sahoo MK, Osorio D and Batra S: NADPH oxidases: An overview from structure to innate immunity-associated pathologies. Cell Mol Immunol. 12:5–23. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar :

Henderson LM: NADPH oxidase subunit gp91phox: A proton pathway. Protoplasma. 217:37–42. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Musset B, Cherny VV, Morgan D and DeCoursey TE: The intimate and mysterious relationship between proton channels and NADPH oxidase. FEBS Lett. 583:7–12. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar :

DeCoursey T, Morgan D and Cherny V: The voltage dependence of NADPH oxidase reveals why phagocytes need proton channels. Nature. 422:531–534. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Friedman J, Kraus S, Hauptman Y, Schiff Y and Seger R: Mechanism of short-term ERK activation by electromagnetic fields at mobile phone frequencies. Biochem J. 405:559–568. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Pratt RD, Brickman CR, Cottrill CL, Shapiro JI and Liu J: The Na/K-ATPase signaling: from specific ligands to general reactive oxygen species. Int J Mol Sci. 19:26002018. View Article : Google Scholar :

Nitahara JA, Cheng W, Liu Y, Li B, Leri A, Li P, Mogul D, Gambert SR, Kajstura J and Anversa P: Intracellular calcium, DNase activity and myocyte apoptosis in aging Fischer 344 rats. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 30:519–535. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Fenton HJH: Oxidation of tartaric acid in presence of iron. J Chem Soc Trans. 65:899–911. 1894. View Article : Google Scholar

Bawin SM and Adey WR: Sensitivity of calcium binding in cerebral tissue to weak environmental electric fields oscillating at low frequency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 73:1999–2003. 1976. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Jackson JD: Classical Electrodynamics. 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; New York, NY: 1975

Barr R, Llanwyn Jones D and Rodger CJ: ELF and VLF radio waves. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys. 62:1689–1718. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar

McLeod KJ, Lee RC and Ehrlich HP: Frequency dependence of electric field modulation of fibroblast protein synthesis. Science. 236:1465–1469. 1987. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Cleary SF, Liu LM, Graham R and Diegelmann RF: Modulation of tendon fibroplasia by exogenous electric currents. Bioelectromagnetics. 9:183–194. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Lee RC, Canaday DJ and Doong H: A review of the biophysical basis for the clinical application of electric fields in soft-tissue repair. J Burn Care Rehabil. 14:319–335. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Sandipan C and Baron C: Basic mechanisms of voltage sensing. Handbook of Ion Channels. Zheng J and Trudeau MC: CRC Press; London: pp. 25–39. 2015

Groome JR and Bayless-Edwards L: Roles for countercharge in the voltage sensor domain of ion channels. Front Pharmacol. 11:1602020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Shi YP, Thouta S and Claydon TW: Modulation of hERG K⁺ channel deactivation by voltage sensor relaxation. Front Pharmacol. 11:1392020. View Article : Google Scholar

Villalba-Galea CA and Chiem AT: Hysteretic behavior in voltage-gated channels. Front Pharmacol. 11:5795962020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Panagopoulos DJ and Margaritis LH: The identification of an intensity 'window' on the bioeffects of mobile telephony radiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 86:358–366. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Panagopoulos DJ and Balmori A: On the biophysical mechanism of sensing atmospheric discharges by living organisms. Sci Total Environ. 599-600:2026–2034. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Liboff AR: Cyclotron resonance in membrane transport. Interactions between Electromagnetic Fields and Cells. Chiabrera A, Nicolini C and Schwan HP: Plenum Press; London: pp. 281–296. 1985

Bianco B, Chiabrera A, Morro A and Parodi M: Effects of magnetic exposure on ions in electric fields. Ferroelectrics. 86:159–168. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar

Balcavage WX, Alvager T, Swez J, Goff CW, Fox MT, Abdullyava S and King MW: A mechanism for action of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on biological systems. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 222:374–378. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Zhadin MN: Combined action of static and alternating magnetic fields on ion motion in a macromolecule: Theoretical aspects. Bioelectromagnetics. 19:279–292. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Liboff AR: Ion cyclotron resonance in biological systems: Experimental evidence. Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields. Stavroulakis P: Springer; Berlin: pp. 76–113. 2003

Lednev VV: Possible mechanism for the influence of weak magnetic fields on biological systems. Bioelectromagnetics. 12:71–75. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Kirschvink JL: Magnetite biomineralization and geomagnetic sensitivity in higher animals: An update and recommendations for future study. Bioelectromagnetics. 10:239–259. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Brocklehurst B and McLauchlan KA: Free radical mechanism for the effects of environmental electromagnetic fields on biological systems. Int J Radiat Biol. 69:3–24. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Sheppard AR, Swicord ML and Balzano Q: Quantitative evaluations of mechanisms of radiofrequency interactions with biological molecules and processes. Health Phys. 93:365–396. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

Hall EJ and Giaccia AJ: Radiobiology for the Radiologist. 6th edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia, PA: 2006

Coggle JE: Biological Effects of Radiation. Taylor & Francis; 1983

Hanahan D and Weinberg RA: The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 100:57–70. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Hanahan D and Weinberg RA: Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell. 144:646–674. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Blank M and Goodman R: Electromagnetic fields stress living cells. Pathophysiology. 16:71–78. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Blank M and Goodman R: DNA is a fractal antenna in electromagnetic fields. Int J Radiat Biol. 87:409–415. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI