
Recent advances in postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation of patients with non‑small cell lung cancer (Review)
- Authors:
- Published online on: November 1, 2022 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2022.5446
- Article Number: 156
-
Copyright: © Su et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
1. Introduction
Lung cancer has the highest mortality rate worldwide and seriously affects patients' health (1). According to National Cancer Center of China statistics, 733,300 new cases of NSCLC were reported in 2015 and there were ~610,200 related deaths (2). According to GLOBOCAN 2020, 820,000 new cases of lung cancer were reported in China in 2020, accounting for ~18% of all new cancer cases. In addition, the total number of lung cancer deaths far exceeded that of other cancer types, comprising ~23.8% of the total number of cancer-associated deaths (1). Over the past decade, the increase in lung cancer-related deaths in China has exceeded the global average (3,4).
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for ~85% of lung cancer cases and is the most common pathological type of lung cancer, including adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (5). Surgery is the main treatment modality for early-stage NSCLC (6). With recent developments in modern medicine, continuous promotion of lung cancer screening and improvements in health awareness, early-stage lung cancer has been more readily detected. Thus, patients' operative and survival rates have also improved. Furthermore, more attention has been paid to improving the quality of life of patients postoperatively (7). In recent years, thoracoscopy technology has developed rapidly and has considerable diagnostic and therapeutic benefits in treating various respiratory diseases. Thoracoscopy is the first choice of treatment for lung cancer due to its low postoperative pain and complications. Among the treatment methods, thoracoscopic lobectomy has become the main treatment method for early-stage NSCLC, as it results in less intraoperative bleeding and pain and comparatively fewer complications (8-10).
Although thoracoscopic lobectomy is more conducive to patient recovery, the probability of various complications after thoracoscopic surgery remains high at 15.8-31.7%, mainly involving pulmonary air and pleural effusion such that, when taking into account the different stages of cancer, 25-70% of patients eventually relapse (11-13). The complication rate for thoracoscopic lobectomy due to sputum retention and weakened respiratory muscle strength is as high as 19-59%, which seriously affects patient recovery (14). Given pulmonary rehabilitation of patients with NSCLC is currently sub-optimal, the present study aimed to summarize the existing pulmonary rehabilitation programs to help clinicians determine better rehabilitation methods for patients with NSCLC.
2. NSCLC stages and status of lung cancer surgery
The lung cancer stage, which is closely related to the surgical method, determines whether a patient may undergo surgery and affects surgical outcomes.
Clinical staging of patients with NSCLC
Accurate lung cancer staging is an important aspect of patient treatment, with early diagnosis and lung cancer stage being the most important factors influencing the treatment plan (15). Between 1943 and 1952, Denoix conceptualized tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging (16). The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer is the only global organization dedicated to lung cancer study and is responsible for collating, analyzing and updating cancer data (17). TNM staging for lung cancer is currently in its 8th edition, with data collected from 1999 to 2010 and the newest edition released in 2017. Compared with the 7th edition, the main differences are in relation to tumor size, the extent of involvement and subclassification of extrathoracic metastases (18). T staging is determined according to the size of the tumor and its relationship with adjacent structures, lymph node staging is determined by assessing the regional hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes and M staging indicates whether there is metastasis outside of the regional lymph nodes (19).
In summary, the clinical stages of NSCLC may be divided into four stages, according to the 8th edition of TNM lung cancer staging: Stages I and II are early-stage NSCLCs, which include T1-3N0M0 and T1-2N1M0. Stages III and IV are locally advanced and advanced NSCLCs, which include T4N0M0, T3-4N1-3M0, and T1-4N0-3M1a-1c (20,21). The appropriate treatment strategy depends on the degree of mediastinal lymph node involvement, which determines whether the tumor is resected alone or in combination with chemoradiotherapy or immunotherapy (Table I) (22-26). The sharp increase in the number of patients with early-stage NSCLC and the reduction in the number of patients with locally advanced and advanced NSCLC may be explained as follows: With increased health awareness, there has been an increase in the number of patients undergoing physical examinations. However, improved medical care also depends on high computed tomography resolution and the use of other advanced instruments and equipment.
Overview of NSCLC surgery
In thoracoscopic lobectomy, the surgeon uses a thoracoscope to observe the status of the chest cavity in real-time on a television screen. Surgery is performed using between one and four incisions ≤5 cm (without opening the ribs) with complete lobectomy (27,28). Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy has become the technique of choice for resection of early-stage lung cancer at numerous institutions. In the National Comprehensive Cancer Network NSCLC guidelines, there is a call for 'strong consideration' of VATS lobectomy (27,29). Treatment-intent pneumonectomy should be considered for stage I lung cancer. Several studies have suggested that segmentectomy should be strongly considered for tumors <2 cm in size, as the results are comparable to lobectomy and the approach is similar for tumors measuring 2.1-3 cm (30-33). In addition, certain studies have demonstrated the efficacy of sublobar resection for solid predominant tumors ≤2 cm (34,35). Patients with stage II lung cancer also benefit from surgical resection; however, there is insufficient evidence concerning the optimal extent of surgical resection, and adjuvant chemotherapy with a platinum-containing dual-drug regimen as a treatment for stage IIB lung cancer has also been recommended (36). A recent retrospective study provided inconclusive results regarding sublobar resection vs. lobectomy in this patient population (37). Patients with stage III lung cancer benefit from a multidisciplinary evaluation, including pneumonectomy, neoadjuvant therapy and immunotherapy, which is a comprehensive treatment regime (38,39). For locally advanced lung cancer or patients with stage IV disease, where lobectomy, bilobectomy or sleeve lobectomy cannot completely resect tumors, VATS pneumonectomy is the first treatment of choice, which is similar to open pneumonectomy, or opting for an integrated and personalized application of immunotherapy (40). While guidelines or expert consensus provide reference standards, each patient differs and should be considered on an individual basis.
Overview of VATS
VATS is a thoracic surgical procedure that uses a small camera to enter a patient's chest through a small incision. It is currently the main surgical method in thoracic surgery (41). In a comparison of VATS with open lobectomy, VATS was indicated to have several advantages. VATS has been associated with reduced pain and blood transfusions, a shorter duration of chest tube intubation and hospital stay, and fewer perioperative complications and arrhythmias. VATS is one of the most recommended surgical methods for treating lung cancer (Table II) (42,43). Compared to the open lobectomy in terms of rehabilitation, thoracoscopic lobectomy has more advantages in length of stay (6 vs. 4 days) and chest tube duration (4 vs. 3 days). In 2007, in relation to treating phase I and II NSCLC, the American College of Chest Physicians identified VATS lobectomy as an acceptable alternative to thoracoscopic surgery (44).
With recent developments in thoracoscopy technology, surgeons performing VATS have gradually switched from the use of multiple incisions to double incisions, with one incision used as an observation hole and the other used to perform the procedure. In single utility port thoracoscopic surgery, one surgical incision is made for observation and to perform the operation. In general, the efficacy of VATS in the treatment of lung cancer is comparable to standard thoracotomy (45-47). Single utility port thoracoscopic surgery is suitable for T-stage T1-T3 (grade II) and N-stage N0-N2 (grade I) lung cancer (43,48). Single utility port thoracoscopic lung surgery has the following advantages: Less bleeding, a shorter operative time and faster recovery than standard multiport thoracoscopic surgery (49,50). However, the postoperative complication rate for single utility port thoracoscopic surgery has been reported to be between 3 and 40% (51). Several recent studies have investigated how to best select the location of the single-hole thoracoscopic incision and whether to place a drainage tube to improve the surgical effect (52-55). Decisions made concerning whether to perform single or multiple incisions or whether to place a drainage tube or not vary from patient to patient, in relation to promoting rapid recovery.
3. Postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with NSCLC
Pathogenesis of lung cancer
Obtaining an in-depth understanding of the pathogenesis of lung cancer facilitates the diagnosis and treatment of NSCLC, and the rehabilitation efficacy and prognosis of patients with NSCLC would be likely to improve. The pathogenesis of lung cancer is related to smoking, radon exposure, air pollution and gene mutation (Fig. 1).
Smoking
Smoking is known to be the most important risk factor for lung cancer (56). A global study reported that, in 2017, smoking was associated with 63.17% of lung cancer-related deaths (57). The incidence of postoperative complications was also indicated to be high among patients who were smokers. A study reported that smoking cessation improved overall survival (OS) of patients with lung cancer (58). Tobacco control, which was implemented in the 1960s, has reduced lung cancer rates. However, ongoing smoking cessation efforts are required to consolidate this result and reduce the lung cancer burden worldwide.
Indoor radon exposure
Radon, a chemically inert radioactive gas of natural origin, produced from uranium and radium in crustal rocks and soils, is the second most common cause of lung cancer (59,60). Inhalation of high levels of indoor radon has been demonstrated to cause DNA mutations and increases risks through depositing decay products in lung epithelial cells (61-63).
Air pollution
Air pollution is a risk factor for lung cancer, as it induces adverse effects on the respiratory system, especially after exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5). PM2.5 exposure leads to lung injury through inflammation, oxidative stress and apoptosis, which increases the morbidity and mortality of respiratory and circulatory diseases (64). PM2.5 promotes the occurrence and development of lung cancer. Compared with tumor-bearing mice in a normal environment, mice exposed to PM2.5 have been indicated to have a higher number of tumor nodules and higher matrix metalloproteinase-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor protein levels, leading to the occurrence of lung cancer (65,66).
Chronic lung diseases
Chronic lung diseases such as tuberculosis and bronchiectasis increase the risk of lung cancer. Several studies have indicated that respiratory diseases are closely related to the morbidity rate of lung cancer (67,68).
Gene mutation
With the rapid development of modern biomedicine, it has become increasingly important to explore the differentially expressed genes in NSCLC. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation is a common gene mutation in NSCLC (69). EGFR gene mutation is a common driver of gene mutations in East Asian populations with NSCLC. TP53 is a tumor suppressor. Previous studies have indicated that TP53 mutations exist in 35-60% of patients with NSCLC, accounting for >50% of the mutation frequency in lung cancer (70). In addition, studies of microRNAs have also broadened the understanding of the pathogenesis of lung cancer.
NSCLC is a chronic disease that frequently requires rehabilitation. Achieving smoking cessation is never too late for patients with NSCLC. Patients should seek to inhale fresh air and increase their exercise levels in a natural environment. Further studies concerning the identification of molecular mechanisms underlying lung cancer metastasis are required, which may then provide new opportunities to eradicate lung cancer metastasis and guide further research and rehabilitation. A better understanding of the pathogenesis of lung cancer is likely to be helpful in developing a multimodal treatment approach that combines lifestyle changes, exercise programs and nutritional support to address rehabilitation challenges faced by patients with NSCLC.
Current status of NSCLC
Although the surgical treatment of NSCLC has demonstrated certain progress, its postoperative complications and recurrence rates remain unsatisfactory. For completely resected stage I NSCLC, local or distant recurrence occurs in 20-40% of patients, with a high risk of recurrence per patient annually, namely, 6-7% in the first four years (71,72). Despite the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, the risk of developing stage I and III disease has been reported to range from 45 to 76% (73). Three- and five-year OS rates after open lobectomy are ~82 and 66%, respectively (74). Table II provides the five-year OS rates for sublobar, lobectomy, stage III and advanced NSCLCs (75-80). Molecular testing was performed for nonsurgical and stage IV NSCLC and treatment was guided according to molecular typing. Despite current surgical techniques and skilled nursing, 19-59% of patients experience postoperative lung complications (14), which then increase hospital stays and hospitalization costs, and may result in poor quality of life. Previous studies have indicated that dyspnea, physical activity tolerance, stair-climbing ability and quality of life may worsen and persist for ≥6 months postoperatively (81-83). Based on these findings, rehabilitation after NSCLC is essential and continued efforts are required to reduce these high complication and recurrence rates.
Importance of pulmonary rehabilitation
Pulmonary rehabilitation is defined as 'comprehensive intervention based on a thorough patient assessment after patient-tailored treatment, including but not limited to exercise training, education and behavioral modification, aimed at improving the physical and mental well-being of patients with chronic respiratory disease and promoting long-term adherence to health-promoting behaviors' (84). Pulmonary rehabilitation includes exercises to strengthen respiratory muscles and educational programs which, in combination, may be expected to contribute to improved rehabilitation outcomes (85-88). Pulmonary rehabilitation is essential in a variety of clinical situations, and National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines state that it may reduce mortality and pulmonary complication rates and may improve lung function (89,90). Several studies have indicated that pulmonary rehabilitation may also improve quality of life, forced expiratory volume in 1 sec and forced vital capacity, and reduce lung cancer complication and mortality rates (91-94). The value of pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with NSCLC after surgery merits increased attention.
4. Current pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with NSCLC
Poor pulmonary rehabilitation affects quality of life and imposes a heavy burden on societies and families. To date, no specific treatment program has been approved to enhance pulmonary rehabilitation. Current evidence in relation to advances in interventions and strategies for pulmonary rehabilitation are summarized in the following sections (Figs. 2 and 3).
Rehabilitation programs in advanced Western countries
Medical rehabilitation programs in advanced Western countries have demonstrated great potential for rehabilitation and have a positive role in improving rehabilitation outcomes (Table III).
Respiratory muscle strength training
Studies have indicated that respiratory muscle strength training, particularly inspiratory muscle strength training, may significantly improve respiratory function, enhance exercise capacity and reduce dyspnea. Studies on prospective pulmonary rehabilitation have indicated that a routine postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation program led by a physical therapist (including breathing pattern, positive pressure breathing, resistance, abdominal wall and respiratory muscle strength training) for 1-6 months has a positive effect on lung function, quality of life, exercise tolerance and emotional disorders (95). A study of respiratory muscle strength preservation with inspiratory muscle training (IMT) demonstrated that IMT did not preserve respiratory muscle strength but improved oxygenation in high-risk patients postoperatively (96). In another study, six weeks of IMT and aerobic exercise in postoperative patients with lung cancer were reported to improve respiratory muscle strength and exercise capacity after VATS (97). Based on these studies, respiratory muscle strength training appears to be a useful rehabilitation measure for complications such as postoperative dyspnea and cough, and may have an important role in preventing postoperative complications.
Interventions in terms of ventilation modes
With advances in mechanical ventilation studies and continuous improvements in ventilation modes, significant attention has been paid to the use of lung protective ventilation strategies in treatment. Surgery causes a variety of lung injuries. One-lung ventilation (OLV) is the most commonly used technique for maintaining intraoperative ventilation and oxygenation. However, selecting an appropriate mechanical ventilation strategy to minimize lung injury and other adverse clinical outcomes remains challenging.
Extensive investigations have been performed to determine the most appropriate modality of mechanical ventilation. One systematic review provided recommendations for each grade. Specifically, recommendations were made to maintain a partial pressure of carbon dioxide of 50-70 mmHg, a pressure volume with a tidal volume (Vt) of 6-8 ml/kg and a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH2O. It was also recommended to control mechanical ventilation using an inhalation to exhalation ratio of 1:1, with pressure-controlled (PC) or PC ventilation-polygraphy recommended rather than volume-controlled ventilation, as well as ensuring continuous positive airway pressure, which is beneficial for improving short-term oxygenation (98). A previous study suggested that protective ventilation and flurbiprofen ester pretreatment may alleviate stress-induced immunosuppression, providing further options for clinical treatment (99). One study indicated that lung protective ventilation combined with low Vt and PEEP during anesthetic induction in lung cancer surgery resulted in improved postoperative outcomes compared with high Vt without PEEP (100). Two other studies reported similar results (101,102). The benefits of low Vt strategies and PEEP values during OLV for better clinical outcomes have been discussed in certain studies; however, the benefits were not found to be statistically significant (103,104). One study reported that a combination of low Vt ventilation and moderate-to-high PEEP (≥5 cm H2O) provided good lung protection for surgical patients receiving general anesthesia (105).
Enhanced recovery after surgical management (ERAS)
The first external validation of the ERAS Society thoracic guidelines suggested that the thoracic ERAS program for lung resection reduced the length of stay, morbidity rate, opioid use and direct costs without a change in readmission (106). Exercise tolerance declines during the complex postoperative period. A recent study found a strong and significant association among peak aerobic capacity, quadriceps muscle function and lung diffusing capacity, suggesting that lower extremity muscle function is a determinant of exercise tolerance in patients with lung cancer after pneumonectomy (7). This finding provides a good indication for rapid postoperative recovery. Exercise also has an important role in recovery after lung cancer surgery. A study on the effects of supervised exercise training on athletic performance, physical activity and sedentary behaviors suggested that clinical populations may benefit from participating in exercise training programs (21). Similarly, personalized home physical activity has also been reported to improve postoperative quality of life and cancer biomarkers in patients with NSCLC (107). Skórkowska-Telich owska et al (108) indicated that Nordic walking is an effective exercise to increase patients' body weight and prevent muscle decay, which supported the beneficial effects of aerobic exercise on rapid recovery in patients with lung disease. The attention of physicians is primarily focused on intraoperative anesthetic management and surgical intervention. For instance, intraoperative paravertebral or intravenous lidocaine or non-intubated thoracoscopic surgery have been attempted in lung resection (109).
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) rehabilitation programs
TCM also has a role in the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases. Specifically, since the outbreak of Coronavirus disease-2019 in 2020, TCM has been used throughout the entire treatment process and has made positive contributions. These findings support the innovative use of TCM and indicate that TCM supports the recovery of patients with NSCLC.
Acupuncture therapy
Acupuncture therapy is a characteristic therapy of TCM. Directly acting on acupoints may effectively improve the respiratory reflex center, remove harmful air in the body, promote physical recovery and improve physical function. Patients with lung cancer inevitably experience pain due to tumor location and spread, as well as from surgical treatment, which seriously affects their quality of life (110,111). Two systematic reviews have indicated that acupuncture may effectively relieve pain, regulate inflammation by stimulating the central nervous system and significantly reduce the expression of tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and IL-6 (112,113). Up to 90% of patients with lung cancer experience side effects such as fatigue after chemotherapy (114). Currently, there is a lack of effective pharmacological interventions for the treatment of cancer-related fatigue (CRF). Hence, complementary and alternative medicine is gaining popularity among patients with cancer and is frequently used to manage cancer-related side effects. Another systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that acupuncture and auricular acupressure combination treatment worked better than acupuncture alone to relieve CRF in patients with lung cancer (115). According to a study by Wei et al (116), the incidence rate of cancer-related insomnia in patients with lung cancer has increased to 68.4%. A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) reported the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of insomnia in patients with lung cancer, with acupuncture potentially providing a promising therapeutic intervention for the clinical treatment of insomnia in lung cancer survivors (117). For NSCLC, postoperative pain, anxiety, insomnia, fatigue and other symptoms affecting the quality of life of patients are conventionally treated with medication to relieve patients' symptoms (118,119). Recently, acupuncture, as a medical alternative therapy, has been extensively applied to improve the postoperative rehabilitation of patients with NSCLC.
Traditional Chinese exercise (TCE)
According to the Chinese State Council's 'Healthy China 2030' Program (120), exercises that are popular should be vigorously developed, the development of sports suitable for different groups and regions should be encouraged and traditional sports, such as Tai Chi Chuan (TCC) and Qigong, should be supported and promoted. TCE has been an important cultural factor in the health culture of TCM for thousands of years. TCC, Baduanjin and Qigong are important components of TCE. TCE has gradually become one of the most widespread complementary therapies for tumor treatment and rehabilitation in China. A systematic review has summarized the current RCTs outlining the effects of TCE in patients with cancer. Although certain studies included had methodological limitations and a relatively high risk of bias, evidence was found for the positive effect of TCE on physical, psychological and physiological parameters in relation to cancer-related health outcomes (121). TCC is a TCE that is beneficial to physical and mental health. Liu et al (122) investigated the positive effects of 16 weeks of TCC exercise on the proliferation and cytolytic/tumoricidal activities of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in postsurgical patients with NSCLC. Regular TCC enhanced PBMC proliferation and cytolytic activity in patients with NSCLC (122). Another study on TCC also concluded that TCC was an effective intervention in the treatment of CRF in patients with lung cancer receiving chemotherapy, particularly in terms of reducing general and physical fatigue and enhancing vitality (123).
These studies have involved postoperative or perioperative rehabilitation programs; however, the role of preoperative rehabilitation has yet to be fully elucidated. In one study involving a preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation program, preoperative resistance training in addition to breathing exercises improved patients' preoperative condition and possibly prevented postoperative functional decline (124). Similarly, a systematic review indicated that preoperative exercise therapy may have beneficial effects on various constitutional variables and postoperative complications in patients with lung cancer planning surgery (66,97). It remains to be elucidated whether preoperative intervention may lead to the deferral of an operation to a more appropriate time and further studies are recommended. However, it would appear that preoperative rehabilitation may be a useful adjunct with numerous advantages and certain disadvantages. Overall, it is important that a patient's freedom of choice is respected when being advised by a physician.
5. Limitations of postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation
With regard to NSCLC, there are consensus guidelines concerning the identification of important factors and the grade of perceived risk; however, the implementation of post-operative rehabilitation measures remains unclear. Currently, various respiratory training methods are used in patients with NSCLC. However, the training method, timing and duration are not uniform, and the guidelines do not clearly indicate the best rehabilitation plan for patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. It remains unclear whether short-term preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation improves the clinical prognosis of patients. Questions remain, such as whether it may help promote ineligible patients with lung cancer to meet surgical requirements or whether it reduces postoperative complications in high-risk patients with lung cancer. Currently, accelerated rehabilitation surgery management is widely used in thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery; however, numerous measures are limited to the perioperative period, and rehabilitation quantity and quality after discharge require to be further improved. In addition, physical activity potentially improves postoperative outcomes; however, the available evidence is weak and larger longitudinal studies are required. A multidisciplinary team approach is crucial in the management of all stages of lung cancer; however, the optimal rehabilitation program remains to be determined.
6. Conclusion and perspectives
Studies on postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation of patients with NSCLC range from conventional research to TCM. The current study first presented the basic epidemiology of lung cancer. Lung cancer TNM stages (according to the 8th edition) and surgical approaches were then examined, including thoracoscopic surgery, which provided a context of postoperative rehabilitation in patients with NSCLC. Finally, the current conventional medical and TCM rehabilitation programs that may achieve better rehabilitation effects were discussed.
With the rapid development of modern medical and examination techniques, a significant number of NSCLCs are detected early and treated surgically. However, with population aging, it remains challenging to determine how to effectively improve the prognosis and quality of life of patients with NSCLC after surgery. It is necessary to optimize the current health management model to ensure efficient care for patients with NSCLC. Various types of respiratory training have differing effects. However, if a training method is complex, patients may experience difficulties and adherence to exercise may be reduced, which is likely to negatively affect their rehabilitation. Therefore, future studies are recommended to determine tailored breathing training methods and the selection and duration of these training methods, in accordance with an individual's characteristics. With the development of TCM, its advantages have become gradually clearer. However, patients undergoing acupuncture and auricular points are frequently restricted owing to the rehabilitation cycle, location and cost, and may not be able to meet all of their long-term rehabilitation needs. Therefore, TCM supplementary therapies that are not affected by location and have low cost and good effects, such as TCC, the six-character formula and Baduanjin, should be encouraged (125). Furthermore, the positive effect of certain single TCM interventions remains elusive and a combination of TCM may be more effective, which is a recommended area for further research. Clinical trials with large sample sizes and multicenter, randomized and accurate statistical analysis methods are required.
The present study systematically analyzed the importance of pulmonary rehabilitation and the rehabilitation measures applied in integrated TCM and in conventional medicine. The advantages and disadvantages of current treatment strategies were also summarized. Although there has been clear progress, certain challenges remain. Further research to improve pulmonary postoperative rehabilitation programs for patients with NSCLC is required.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Authors' contributions
XES, CLL and FL were involved in the conception of the review; HFH, SL and SHW reviewed and edited the final manuscript. XES and WPH drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Acknowledgments
Not applicable.
Funding
This work was supported by the Nursery Fund Project of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (grant no. 2021MP25).
Abbreviations:
CRF |
cancer-related fatigue |
EGFR |
epidermal growth factor receptor |
ERAS |
enhanced recovery after surgery |
IL |
interleukin |
IMT |
inspiratory muscle training |
NSCLC |
non-small cell lung cancer |
OLV |
one-lung ventilation |
OS |
overall survival |
PBMC |
peripheral blood mononuclear cell |
PC |
pressure-controlled |
PEEP |
positive end-expiratory pressure |
RCT |
randomized controlled trial |
TCC |
Tai Chi Chuan |
TCE |
traditional Chinese exercise |
TCM |
traditional Chinese medicine |
TNM |
tumor-node-metastasis |
VATS |
video-assisted thoracic surgery |
References
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal and Bray F: Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 71:209–249. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ and He J: Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 66:115–132. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang N, Mengersen K, Tong S, Kimlin M, Zhou M and Hu W: Global, regional, and national burden of lung cancer and its attributable risk factors, 1990 to 2017. Cancer. 126:4220–4234. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wei W, Zeng H, Zheng R, Zhang S, An L, Chen R, Wang S, Sun K, Matsuda T, Bray F and He J: Cancer registration in China and its role in cancer prevention and control. Lancet Oncol. 21:e342–e349. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wadowska K, Błasiak P, Rzechonek A, Bil-Lula I and Śliwińska-Mossoń M: New insights on old biomarkers involved in tumor microenvironment changes and their diagnostic relevance in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Biomolecules. 11:12082021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Allehebi A, Kattan KA, Rujaib MA, Dayel FA, Black E, Mahrous M, AlNassar M, Hussaini HA, Twairgi AA, Abdelhafeiz N, et al: Management of early-stage resected non-small cell lung cancer: Consensus statement of the lung cancer consortium. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 31:1005382022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhong WZ; Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group; Chinese Society of Lung Cancer; Lung Cancer Group of Oncology Branch Chinese Medical Association; Multidisciplinary Team Diagnosis and Treatment Committee, Chinses Medical Doctor Association: Chinses expert consensus on the multidisciplinary team diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 42:817–828. 2020.In Chinese. PubMed/NCBI | |
Moyer J, Lee H and Vu L: Thoracoscopic lobectomy for congenital lung lesions. Clin Perinatol. 44:781–794. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang J, Zhao H, Lv L, Yuan J and Sun Y: Uniportal thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy in the treatment of lung cancer. Pak J Med Sci. 36:182–186. 2020.PubMed/NCBI | |
Song Y, Zheng C, Zhou S, Cui H, Wang J, Wang J, Wang W, Liu L and Liu J: The application analysis of 8F ultrafine chest drainage tube for thoracoscopic lobectomy of lung cancer. J Cardiothorac Surg. 16:1042021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liang W, Cai K, Chen C, Chen H, Chen Q, Fu J, Hu J, Jiang T, Jiao W, Li S, et al: Expert consensus on neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 9:2696–2715. 2020. | |
Zheng Y, Mao M, Ji M, Zheng Q, Liu L, Zhao Z, Wang H, Wei X, Wang Y, Chen J, et al: Does a pulmonary rehabilitation based ERAS program (PREP) affect pulmonary complication incidence, pulmonary function and quality of life after lung cancer surgery? Study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMC Pulm Med. 20:442020.PubMed/NCBI | |
Bailey KL, Merchant N, Seo YJ, Elashoff D, Benharash P and Yanagawa J: Short-term readmissions after open, thoracoscopic, and robotic lobectomy for lung cancer based on the nationwide readmissions database. World J Surg. 43:1377–1384. 2019.PubMed/NCBI | |
Yasuura Y, Maniwa T, Mori K, Miyata N, Mizuno K, Shimizu R, Kayata H, Kojima H, Isaka M and Ohde Y: Quantitative computed tomography for predicting cardiopulmonary complications after lobectomy for lung cancer in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 67:697–703. 2019.PubMed/NCBI | |
Rami-Porta R, Bolejack V, Giroux DJ, Chansky K, Crowley J, Asamura H and Goldstraw P; International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee, Advisory Board Members and Participating Institutions: The IASLC lung cancer staging project: The new database to inform the eighth edition of the TNM classification of lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 9:1618–1624. 2014.PubMed/NCBI | |
Rami-Porta R, Asamura H, Travis WD and Rusch VW: Lung cancer-major changes in the American joint committee on cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 67:138–155. 2017.PubMed/NCBI | |
Giroux DJ, Van Schil P, Asamura H, Rami-Porta R, Chansky K, Crowley JJ, Rusch VW and Kernstine K; International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee: The IASLC lung cancer staging project: A renewed call to participation. J Thorac Oncol. 13:801–809. 2018.PubMed/NCBI | |
Lim W, Ridge CA, Nicholson AG and Mirsadraee S: The 8th lung cancer TNM classification and clinical staging system: Review of the changes and clinical implications. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 8:709–718. 2018.PubMed/NCBI | |
Mirsadraee S, Oswal D, Alizadeh Y, Caulo A and van Beek E Jr: The 7th lung cancer TNM classification and staging system: Review of the changes and implications. World J Radiol. 4:128–134. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Tan WL, Chua KLM, Lin CC, Lee VHF, Tho LM, Chan AW, Ho GF, Reungwetwattana T, Yang JC, Kim DW, et al: Asian thoracic oncology research group expert consensus statement on optimal management of stage III NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 15:324–343. 2020. | |
Rami-Porta R, Bolejack V, Crowley J, Ball D, Kim J, Lyons G, Rice T, Suzuki K, Thomas CF Jr, Travis WD, et al: The IASLC lung cancer staging project: Proposals for the revisions of the T descriptors in the forthcoming eighth edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 10:990–1003. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK, Meyer L, Gress DM, Byrd DR and Winchester DP: The eighth edition AJCC cancer staging manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more 'personalized' approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 67:93–99. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lababede O and Meziane MA: The eighth edition of TNM staging of lung cancer: Reference chart and diagrams. Oncologist. 23:844–848. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ettinger DS, Aisner DL, Wood DE, Akerley W, Bauman J, Chang JY, Chirieac LR, D'Amico TA, Dilling TJ, Dobelbower M, et al: NCCN guidelines insights: Non-small cell lung cancer, version 5.2018. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 16:807–821. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Moulla Y, Gradistanac T, Wittekind C, Eichfeld U, Gockel I and Dietrich A: Predictive risk factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer: A case control study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 14:112019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bezjak A, Temin S, Franklin G, Giaccone G, Govindan R, Johnson ML, Rimner A, Schneider BJ, Strawn J and Azzoli CG: Definitive and adjuvant radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline endorsement of the american society for radiation oncology evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 33:2100–2105. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Berfield KS, Farjah F and Mulligan MS: Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 107:603–609. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
McKenna RJ Jr, Houck W and Fuller CB: Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: Experience with 1,100 cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 81:421–426. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aisner DL, Akerley W, Bauman J, Chirieac LR, D'Amico TA, DeCamp MM, Dilling TJ, Dobelbower M, et al: Non-small cell lung cancer, version 5.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 15:504–535. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cao J, Yuan P, Wang Y, Xu J, Yuan X, Wang Z, Lv W and Hu J: Survival rates after lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection for non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 105:1483–1491. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li F, Zhao Y, Yuan L, Wang S and Mao Y: Oncologic outcomes of segmentectomy vs lobectomy in pathologic stage IA (≤2 cm) invasive lung adenocarcinoma: A population-based study. J Surg Oncol. 121:1132–1139. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kodama K, Higashiyama M, Okami J, Tokunaga T, Imamura F, Nakayama T, Inoue A and Kuriyama K: Oncologic outcomes of segmentectomy versus lobectomy for clinical T1a N0 M0 non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 101:504–511. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Landreneau RJ, Normolle DP, Christie NA, Awais O, Wizorek JJ, Abbas G, Pennathur A, Shende M, Weksler B, Luketich JD and Schuchert MJ: Recurrence and survival outcomes after anatomic segmentectomy versus lobectomy for clinical stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: A propensity-matched analysis. J Clin Oncol. 32:2449–2455. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nakamura K, Saji H, Nakajima R, Okada M, Asamura H, Shibata T, Nakamura S, Tada H and Tsuboi M: A phase III randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for small-sized peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 40:271–274. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Suzuki K, Saji H, Aokage K, Watanabe SI, Okada M, Mizusawa J, Nakajima R, Tsuboi M, Nakamura S, Nakamura K, et al: Comparison of pulmonary segmentectomy and lobectomy: Safety results of a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 158:895–907. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang Z, Cheng Y, An T, Gao H, Wang K, Zhou Q, Hu Y, Song Y, Ding C, Peng F, et al: Detection of EGFR mutations in plasma circulating tumour DNA as a selection criterion for first-line gefitinib treatment in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma (BENEFIT): A phase 2, single-arm, multicentre clinical trial. Lancet Respir Med. 6:681–690. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sinn K, Gschwandtner E, Steindl A and Taghavi S: Hoda MA. EP117–15. comparison of long-term outcome of wedge resection, anatomical segmentectomy and lobectomy in stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 14(Suppl): S10892019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Spicer JD, Shewale JB, Nelson DB, Mitchell KG, Bott MJ, Vallières E, Wilshire CL, Vaporciyan AA, Swisher SG, Jones DR, et al: Multimodality therapy for N2 non-small cell lung cancer: An evolving paradigm. Ann Thorac Surg. 107:277–284. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Dickhoff C, Senan S, Schneiders FL, Veltman J, Hashemi S, Daniels JMA, Fransen M, Heineman DJ, Radonic T, van de Ven PM, et al: Ipilimumab plus nivolumab and chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with resectable and borderline resectable T3-4N0-1 non-small cell lung cancer: The INCREASE trial. BMC Cancer. 20:7642020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Haam S: Video-assisted thoracic surgery pneumonectomy. J Chest Sur. 54:253–257. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ng CS, Wan S, Lee TW, Wan IY, Arifi AA and Yim AP: Video-assisted thoracic surgery in spontaneous pneumothorax. Can Respir J. 9:122–127. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Paul S, Altorki NK, Sheng S, Lee PC, Harpole DH, Onaitis MW, Stiles BM, Port JL and D'Amico TA: Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: A propensity-matched analysis from the STS database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 139:366–378. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Han D, Cao Y, Wu H, Wang H, Jiang L, Zhao D, Yao F, Li S, Zhang C, Zheng B, et al: Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for the treatment of lung cancer: A consensus report from Chinese society for thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (CSTCVS) and Chinese association of thoracic surgeons (CATS). Transl Lung Cancer Res. 9:971–987. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Scott WJ, Howington J, Feigenberg S, Movsas B and Pisters K; American College of Chest Physicians: Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer stage I and stage II: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 132(3 Suppl): 234S–242S. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dziedzic D and Orlowski T: The role of VATS in lung cancer surgery: Current status and prospects for development. Minim Invasive Surg. 2015:9384302015.PubMed/NCBI | |
Ng CS, Gonzalez-Rivas D, D'Amico TA and Rocco G: Uniportal VATS-a new era in lung cancer surgery. J Thorac Dis. 7:1489–1491. 2015.PubMed/NCBI | |
Gao Y, Abulimiti A, He D, Ran A and Luo D: Comparison of single- and triple-port VATS for lung cancer: A meta-analysis. Open Med (Wars). 16:1228–1239. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bertolaccini L, Batirel H, Brunelli A, Gonzalez-Rivas D, Ismail M, Ucar AM, Ng CSH, Scarci M, Sihoe ADL, Ugalde PA, et al: Corrigendum to 'uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: A consensus report from the uniportal VATS interest group (UVIG) of the European society of thoracic surgeons (ESTS)'. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019.56:224–9. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 56:628–629. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wang BY, Liu CY, Hsu PK, Shih CS and Liu CC: Single-incision versus multiple-incision thoracoscopic lobectomy and segmentectomy: A propensity-matched analysis. Ann Surg. 261:793–799. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Han KN, Kim HK, Lee HJ and Choi YH: Single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy: A report on 30 cases†. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 49(Suppl 1): i42–i47. 2016. | |
Sihoe ADL: Uniportal lung cancer surgery: State of the evidence. Ann Thorac Surg. 107:962–972. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Shen Y, Zhang Y, Sun J, Gu J, Yuan Y and Wang Q: Transaxillary uniportal video assisted thoracoscopic surgery for right upper lobectomy. J Thorac Dis. 10:E214–E217. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zieliński M, Nabialek T and Pankowski J: Transcervical uniportal pulmonary lobectomy. J Vis Surg. 4:422018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Palleschi A, Mendogni P, Mariolo AV, Nosotti M and Rosso L: An alternative chest tube placement after uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery. J Thorac Dis. 10:3078–3080. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kao CN, Chang CW, Hsieh MC, Liu YW and Chou SH: Pre-embedding subcutaneous suture for chest-tube insertion in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. J Thorac Dis. 9:E938–E940. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Global Burden of Disease 2019 Cancer Collaboration; Kocarnik JM, Compton K, Dean FE, Fu W, Gaw BL, Harvey JD, Henrikson HJ, Lu D, Pennini A, et al: Cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life years for 29 cancer groups from 2010 to 2019: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. JAMA Oncol. 8:420–444. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Yang X, Man J, Chen H, Zhang T, Yin X, He Q and Lu M: Temporal trends of the lung cancer mortality attributable to smoking from 1990 to 2017: A global, regional and national analysis. Lung Cancer. 152:49–57. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Jeon J, Holford TR, Levy DT, Feuer EJ, Cao P, Tam J, Clarke L, Clarke J, Kong CY and Meza R: Smoking and Lung cancer mortality in the United States from 2015 to 2065: A comparative modeling approach. Ann Intern Med. 169:684–693. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
No authors listed. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee WHO Handbook on indoor radon: A public health perspective. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009 | |
Kim SH, Hwang WJ, Cho JS and Kang DR: Attributable risk of lung cancer deaths due to indoor radon exposure. Ann Occup Environ Med. 28:82016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Peterson E, Aker A, Kim J, Li Y, Brand K and Copes R: Lung cancer risk from radon in Ontario, Canada: How many lung cancers can we prevent? Cancer Causes Control. 24:2013–2020. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Al-Zoughool M and Krewski D: Health effects of radon: A review of the literature. Int J Radiat Biol. 85:57–69. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Enflo A: Lung cancer risks from residential radon among smokers and non-smokers. J Radiol Prot. 22:A95–A99. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Al-Rubaie A, Wise AF, Sozo F, De Matteo R, Samuel CS, Harding R and Ricardo SD: The therapeutic effect of mesenchymal stem cells on pulmonary myeloid cells following neonatal hyperoxic lung injury in mice. Respir Res. 19:1142018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ning J, Li P, Zhang B, Han B, Su X, Wang Q, Wang X, Li B, Kang H, Zhou L, et al: miRNAs deregulation in serum of mice is associated with lung cancer related pathway deregulation induced by PM2.5. Environ Pollut. 254:1128752019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang B and Xiao C: PM2.5 exposure significantly improves the exacerbation of A549 tumor-bearing CB17-SCID mice. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 60:169–175. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jiang L, Sun YQ, Langhammer A, Brumpton BM, Chen Y, Nilsen TI, Leivseth L, Wahl SGF and Mai XM: Asthma and asthma symptom control in relation to incidence of lung cancer in the HUNT study. Sci Rep. 11:45392021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Szalontai K, Gémes N, Furák J, Varga T, Neuperger P, Balog JÁ, Puskás LG and Szebeni GJ: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Epidemiology, biomarkers, and paving the way to lung cancer. J Clin Med. 10:28892021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang J and Wang H: Targeted therapy and mechanism of drug resistance in non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 25:183–192. 2022.In Chinese. PubMed/NCBI | |
Halvorsen AR, Silwal-Pandit L, Meza-Zepeda LA, Vodak D, Vu P, Sagerup C, Hovig E, Myklebost O, Børresen-Dale AL, Brustugun OT and Helland Å: TP53 mutation spectrum in smokers and never smoking lung cancer patients. Front Genet. 7:852016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Winton T, Livingston R, Johnson D, Rigas J, Johnston M, Butts C, Cormier Y, Goss G, Inculet R, Vallieres E, et al: Vinorelbine plus cisplatin vs observation in resected non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 352:2589–2597. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lou F, Huang J, Sima CS, Dycoco J, Rusch V and Bach PB: Patterns of recurrence and second primary lung cancer in early-stage lung cancer survivors followed with routine computed tomography surveillance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 145:75–82. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Pignon JP, Tribodet H, Scagliotti GV, Douillard JY, Shepherd FA, Stephens RJ, Dunant A, Torri V, Rosell R, Seymour L, et al: Lung adjuvant cisplatin evaluation: A pooled analysis by the LACE collaborative group. J Clin Oncol. 26:3552–3559. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tandberg DJ, Tong BC, Ackerson BG and Kelsey CR: Surgery versus stereotactic body radiation therapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: A comprehensive review. Cancer. 124:667–678. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Choi SY, Moon MH and Moon Y: The prognosis of small-sized non-small cell lung cancer with visceral pleural invasion after sublobar resection. Transl Cancer Res. 9:6431–6443. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zheng YW, Li RM, Zhang XW and Ren XB: Current adoptive immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer and potential influence of therapy outcome. Cancer Invest. 31:197–205. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Malik PS and Raina V: Lung cancer: Prevalent trends & emerging concepts. Indian J Med Res. 141:5–7. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Detterbeck FC, Chansky K, Groome P, Bolejack V, Crowley J, Shemanski L, Kennedy C, Krasnik M, Peake M, Rami-Porta R, et al: The IASLC lung cancer staging project: Methodology and validation used in the development of proposals for revision of the stage classification of NSCLC in the forthcoming (eighth) edition of the TNM classification of lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 11:1433–1446. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yoon SM, Shaikh T and Hallman M: Therapeutic management options for stage III non-small cell lung cancer. World J Clin Oncol. 8:1–20. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Iyengar P, Kavanagh BD, Wardak Z, Smith I, Ahn C, Gerber DE, Dowell J, Hughes R, Abdulrahman R, Camidge DR, et al: Phase II trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy combined with erlotinib for patients with limited but progressive metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 32:3824–3830. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jack S, West MA, Raw D, Marwood S, Ambler G, Cope TM, Shrotri M, Sturgess RP, Calverley PM, Ottensmeier CH and Grocott MP: The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on physical fitness and survival in patients undergoing oesophagogastric cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 40:1313–1320. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ni HJ, Pudasaini B, Yuan XT, Li HF and Yuan P: Exercise training for patients pre- and postsurgically treated for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Integr Cancer Ther. 16:63–73. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Pan H, Pei Y, Li B, Wang Y, Liu J and Lin H: Tai Chi Chuan in postsurgical non-small cell lung cancer patients: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 19:22018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rochester CL, Vogiatzis I, Holland AE, Lareau SC, Marciniuk DD, Puhan MA, Spruit MA, Masefield S, Casaburi R, Clini EM, et al: An official american thoracic society/European respiratory society policy statement: Enhancing implementation, use, and delivery of pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 192:1373–1386. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hill K, Vogiatzis I and Burtin C: The importance of components of pulmonary rehabilitation, other than exercise training, in COPD. Eur Respir Rev. 22:405–413. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wouters EF, Posthuma R, Koopman M, Liu WY, Sillen MJ, Hajian B, Sastry M, Spruit MA and Franssen FM: An update on pulmonary rehabilitation techniques for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Expert Rev Respir Med. 14:149–161. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wilson JS, O'Neill B, Reilly J, MacMahon J and Bradley JM: Education in pulmonary rehabilitation: The patient's perspective. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 88:1704–1709. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Aldhahir AM, Rajeh AMA, Aldabayan YS, Drammeh S, Subbu V, Alqahtani JS, Hurst JR and Mandal S: Nutritional supplementation during pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: A systematic review. Chron Respir Dis. 17:14799731209049532020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Poston G, Tait D, Beattie R, Byrne C, Chapman J, Devereux L, Glynne-Jones R, Harrison M, Holman C, Ilyas M, et al: National institute for health and clinical excellence: The diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer: Full guideline. 2011. | |
Jamison DT, Gelband H, Horton S, Jha P, Laxminarayan R, Mock CN and Nugent R: Disease control priorities: Improving health and reducing poverty. 3rd edition. Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank; 2017 | |
Tiep B, Sun V, Koczywas M, Kim J, Raz D, Hurria A and Hayter J: Pulmonary rehabilitation and palliative care for the lung cancer patient. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 17:462–468. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vagvolgyi A, Rozgonyi Z, Kerti M, Agathou G, Vadasz P and Varga J: Effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation and correlations in between functional parameters, extent of thoracic surgery and severity of post-operative complications: Randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Dis. 10:3519–3531. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Choi J, Yang Z, Lee J, Lee JH, Kim HK, Yong HS and Lee SY: Usefulness of pulmonary rehabilitation in non-small cell lung cancer patients based on pulmonary function tests and muscle analysis using computed tomography images. Cancer Res Treat. 54:793–802. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Mao X, Ni Y, Niu Y and Jiang L: The clinical value of pulmonary rehabilitation in reducing postoperative complications and mortality of lung cancer resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Surg. 8:6854852021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tenconi S, Mainini C, Rapicetta C, Braglia L, Galeone C, Cavuto S, Merlo DF, Costi S, Paci M, Piro R and Fugazzaro S: Rehabilitation for lung cancer patients undergoing surgery: Results of the PUREAIR randomized trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 57:1002–1011. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Brocki BC, Andreasen JJ, Langer D, Souza DS and Westerdahl E: Postoperative inspiratory muscle training in addition to breathing exercises and early mobilization improves oxygenation in high-risk patients after lung cancer surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 49:1483–1491. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Liu JF, Kuo NY, Fang TP, Chen JO, Lu HI and Lin HL: A six-week inspiratory muscle training and aerobic exercise improves respiratory muscle strength and exercise capacity in lung cancer patients after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 35:840–850. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Gao S, Zhang Z, Brunelli A, Chen C, Chen C, Chen G, Chen H, Chen JS, Cassivi S, Chai Y, et al: The society for translational medicine: Clinical practice guidelines for mechanical ventilation management for patients undergoing lobectomy. J Thorac Dis. 9:3246–3254. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yuan J, Cen S, Li J, Wang K, Chen Q, Li H and Zhang Y: Effect of lung protective ventilation combined with flurbiprofen axetil on immune function during thoracoscopic radical resection of lung cancer. Front Surg. 9:8404202022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Marret E, Cinotti R, Berard L, Piriou V, Jobard J, Barrucand B, Radu D, Jaber S and Bonnet F; PPV study group: Protective ventilation during anaesthesia reduces major postoperative complications after lung cancer surgery: A double-blind randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 35:727–735. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang M, Ahn HJ, Kim K, Kim JA, Yi CA, Kim MJ and Kim HJ: Does a protective ventilation strategy reduce the risk of pulmonary complications after lung cancer surgery?: A randomized controlled trial. Chest. 139:530–537. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lederman D, Easwar J, Feldman J and Shapiro V: Anesthetic considerations for lung resection: Preoperative assessment, intraoperative challenges and postoperative analgesia. Ann Transl Med. 7:3562019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Amar D, Zhang H, Pedoto A, Desiderio DP, Shi W and Tan KS: Protective lung ventilation and morbidity after pulmonary resection: A propensity score-matched analysis. Anesth Analg. 125:190–199. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kiss T, Wittenstein J, Becker C, Birr K, Cinnella G, Cohen E, El Tahan MR, Falcão LF, Gregoretti C, Granell M, et al: Protective ventilation with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure during one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgery (PROTHOR): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 20:2132019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Deng QW, Tan WC, Zhao BC, Wen SH, Shen JT and Xu M: Intraoperative ventilation strategies to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications: A network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 124:324–335. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Haro GJ, Sheu B, Marcus SG, Sarin A, Campbell L, Jablons DM and Kratz JR: Perioperative lung resection outcomes after implementation of a multidisciplinary, evidence-based thoracic ERAS program. Ann Surg. 274:e1008–e1013. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Mittaz Hager AG, Mathieu N, Lenoble-Hoskovec C, Swanenburg J, de Bie R and Hilfiker R: Effects of three home-based exercise programmes regarding falls, quality of life and exercise-adherence in older adults at risk of falling: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 19:132019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Skórkowska-Telichowska K, Kropielnicka K, Bulińska K, Pilch U, Woźniewski M, Szuba A and Jasiński R: Nordic walking in the second half of life. Aging Clin Exp Res. 28:1035–1046. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xian H, Li Y, Zou B, Chen Y, Yin H, Li X and Pan Y: Identification of TIMELESS and RORA as key clock molecules of non-small cell lung cancer and the comprehensive analysis. BMC Cancer. 22:1072022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Iyer S, Taylor-Stokes G and Roughley A: Symptom burden and quality of life in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients in France and Germany. Lung Cancer. 81:288–293. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Simmons CP, Macleod N and Laird BJ: Clinical management of pain in advanced lung cancer. Clin Med Insights Oncol. 6:331–346. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang FM, Yao L, Wang SJ, Guo Y, Xu ZF, Zhang CH, Zhang K, Fang YX and Liu YY: Current tracking on effectiveness and mechanisms of acupuncture therapy: A literature review of high-quality studies. Chin J Integr Med. 26:310–320. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kuang R, Xiong G, Lv W, Zhao Y, Yu M and Jiang J: Efficacy and safety of acupuncture combined with analgesics on lung cancer pain: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 100:e262252021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ebede CC, Jang Y and Escalante CP: Cancer-related fatigue in cancer survivorship. Med Clin North Am. 101:1085–1097. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li H and Liu H: Combined effects of acupuncture and auricular acupressure for relieving cancer-related fatigue in patients during lung cancer chemotherapy: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 100:e275022021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wei TT, Chen XC, Hou YX and Radiotherapy DO: Relationship between cancer-related insomnia and relevant symptoms of tumor in patients with lung cancer during chemotherapy. Chin Gen Pract. 2015. | |
Yue H, Zhou S, Wu H, Yin X, Li S, Liang T, Li Y, Fang Z, Zhang X, Wang L, et al: Efficacy and safety of electro-acupuncture (EA) on insomnia in patients with lung cancer: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 21:7882020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Turcott JG, Del Rocío Guillen Núñez M, Flores-Estrada D, Oñate-Ocaña LF, Zatarain-Barrón ZL, Barrón F and Arrieta O: The effect of nabilone on appetite, nutritional status, and quality of life in lung cancer patients: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Support Care Cancer. 26:3029–3038. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Matsutani N and Kawamura M: Significant improvement of chronic pain by Pregabalin after thoracotomy: Report of four cases. Surg Today. 43:915–917. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chen P, Wang D, Shen H, Yu L, Gao Q, Mao L, Jiang F, Luo Y, Xie M, Zhang Y, et al: Physical activity and health in Chinese children and adolescents: Expert consensus statement (2020). Br J Sports Med. 54:1321–1331. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Song Y, Sun D, István B, Thirupathi A, Liang M, Teo EC and Gu Y: Current evidence on traditional Chinese exercise for cancers: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 17:50112020. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Liu J, Chen P, Wang R, Yuan Y, Wang X and Li C: Effect of Tai Chi on mononuclear cell functions in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Complement Altern Med. 15:32015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang LL, Wang SZ, Chen HL and Yuan AZ: Tai Chi exercise for cancer-related fatigue in patients with lung cancer under-going chemotherapy: A randomized controlled trial. J Pain Symptom Manage. 51:504–511. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sebio García R, Yáñez-Brage MI, Giménez Moolhuyzen E, Salorio Riobo M, Lista Paz A and Borro Mate JM: Preoperative exercise training prevents functional decline after lung resection surgery: A randomized, single-blind controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 31:1057–1067. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang L, Xie D, Yu Y, Liu H, Shi Y, Shi T and Wen C: TCMID 2.0: A comprehensive resource for TCM. Nucleic Acids Res. 46(D1): D1117–D1120. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : |