International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.
International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.
Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.
Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.
Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.
Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.
International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.
Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.
Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.
Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.
An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.
Since the 'seed and soil' theory was proposed in 1889 to describe the association between tumor cells and their surrounding environment (1), a growing number of researchers have recognized the importance of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in tumor development (2-4). As the 'soil' for tumor cell growth, the TME contains nutrients, regulatory factors, extracellular matrix (ECM), intertwined blood vessels and diverse stromal and immune cells (5). Interactions between the components within the TME drive dynamic changes and the alterations of properties or quantities in certain components, such as decreased T cell function, increased stromal density and rising levels of inflammatory cytokines, may affect tumor growth (3). Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are prominent stromal cells within the TME and influence tumor behavior through multiple complex mechanisms (4). Furthermore, they impede the efficacy of various tumor therapies, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy by enhancing tumor cell stemness and eliciting immunosuppression (5,6).
CAF characterization primarily relies on morphology (elongated or stellate shape), biological properties and expression of canonical biomarkers including α smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), vimentin, fibroblast activation protein (FAP), platelet-derived growth factor receptors (PDGFRs), podoplanin, periostin (POSTN), transgelin (TAGLN), collagen (COL)1A1, COL1A2 and S100A4 (7). However, that these markers are not universally co-expressed across all CAFs (6). For example, in glioblastoma, the majority of CAFs co-expressing FAP and PDGFRβ are negative for α-SMA (6). Multiplex immunohistochemical analysis in pancreatic cancer has revealed that only a minor subset of CAFs co-express α-SMA and FAP (8). Markers such as COL1A1, COL1A2, PDGFRα and vimentin are broadly distributed across diverse CAF populations, whereas others, including TAGLN, FAP, S100A4, α-SMA and PDGFRβ, display notable subpopulation-restricted enrichment (9). This phenomenon has been conceptualized as CAF heterogeneity, spurring the development of CAF classification frameworks grounded in transcriptional profiles or functional characteristics (9).
Among CAF-related markers, FAP shows the strongest association with other markers (10). It is a type II transmembrane glycoprotein possessing dual dipeptidyl peptidase and gelatinase/collagenase activity (10). Notably, evidence has revealed the protease-independent roles of FAP as a signaling molecule participating in the regulation of multiple signaling pathways (10). FAP+ CAFs are a CAF subset characterized by high FAP expression. The abundance of FAP+ CAFs increases with advancing tumor stage (11). Given their prominent pro-tumor functions, FAP+ CAFs have garnered notable attention in the field of tumor stroma research in recent years (12,13). The cell surface localization of FAP also allows efficient isolation of FAP+ CAFs via fluorescence-activated cell sorting, facilitating experimental characterization and mechanistic investigation (6).
The present review aimed to summarize the cellular origins, spatial distribution and function of FAP+ CAFs from a dual perspective as a practical marker delineating the FAP+ CAF subset and a functional molecule actively shaping a distinct TME. In addition, the present study aimed to evaluate diagnostic and therapeutic strategies targeting FAP+ CAFs and summarize their potential for combination with existing clinical regimens. The present review aimed to provide an overall framework outlining the roles of FAP+ CAFs in tumor progression, diagnosis and treatment to promote their translational application.
CAFs represent a highly heterogeneous cell population. They originate from diverse precursors including resident fibroblasts, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, epithelial cells and endothelial cells, macrophages, pericytes and adipocytes, each of which is driven by distinct activation signals to acquire a unique CAF-like phenotype (14). There are concomitantly harbored anti- and pro-tumorigenic and functionally neutral CAFs in tumor stroma (7,9). Different CAF subtypes exhibit distinct gene expression profiles, serve dynamic roles in tumor progression and show differential associations with therapy responses and clinical outcomes (8). FAP+ CAFs represent one of the most prevalent CAF populations, therefore, understanding of their distribution, unique features and the mechanisms driving their expansion is fundamental for decoding how stromal cells behave and function in malignant progression and identifying stage-specific therapeutic vulnerabilities.
FAP serves not only as a key marker for identifying FAP+ CAFs but also as a functional protein with biological roles (15). In vivo, FAP exists primarily in two isoforms: A membrane-bound and a soluble form (16). Soluble FAP (sFAP) is detectable in both the TME and the plasma of patients with cancer (16,17). In colorectal cancer, plasma sFAP levels are inversely associated with tumor size, depth of invasion and overall survival (17). However, circulating sFAP is not derived from tumor tissue but from physiological sources such as skeletal muscle, liver and bone marrow, and may reflect a systemic host response to malignancy, analogous to the decline in plasma levels of negative acute-phase proteins during acute inflammation (17). The membrane-bound form is expressed on the cell surface. Although FAP expression in cancer has been documented in other cell types, including tumor, endothelial and immune cells and pericytes (18,19), its most prominent expression is consistently observed in CAFs (18,20).
From a tissue localization perspective, FAP is highly expressed in inflammatory lesions and tumor tissue, which are marked by common pathological features such as tissue remodeling, angiogenesis and immune cell infiltration (21). By contrast, FAP expression is low in most normal and adjacent non-neoplastic tissue (22). Analysis of transcriptomic data from the Human Protein Atlas database reveals that elevated FAP expression is commonly observed in tumor tissue from patients with various solid malignancies, including colorectal, gastric, breast, pancreatic and prostate cancer (23) (Fig. 1). These data suggest that FAP may serve as a potential biomarker associated with malignant progression.
Similar to the distribution pattern of FAP in tumors, immunohistochemical staining and spatial transcriptomic analyses have revealed that FAP+ CAFs are widely distributed across multiple tumor types, such as breast, lung and pancreatic cancer, while exhibiting a degree of tissue-specific spatial preference (9,13,21). In colorectal cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma, FAP+ CAFs are typically enriched at the invasive tumor margin, a position that facilitates their interaction with tumor-infiltrating immune cells such as macrophages and T cells (24,25). Additionally, FAP+ CAFs accumulate in perivascular niches or localize near both cancer and immune cells (26). Collectively, FAP and FAP+ CAFs exhibit concordant spatial distribution patterns, with both concentrating in functional niches associated with metastasis, angiogenesis and immune cell infiltration (18,21). Thus, the detection of FAP expression has been widely adopted as a practical method for inferring the abundance and distribution of FAP+ CAFs in malignant tumors (21,27,28).
Based on the expression of classic CAF markers, CAF have been primarily stratified into FAP+ and α-SMA+ subsets in multiple studies (9,29,30). There is a less prevalent but consistently observed CAF population co-expressing elevated levels of both FAP and α-SMA (FAP+ α-SMA+ CAFs) (31,32). By contrast, certain current studies have categorized CAFs into three major functional subpopulations: Myofibroblastic CAFs (myCAFs), inflammatory CAFs (iCAFs) and antigen-presenting CAFs (apCAFs) based on gene expression profiles, spatial distribution and functional markers (33,34). Of note, the CAF subsets defined by these classification systems share similarities in their molecular signatures and dominant signaling pathways (Fig. 2).
α-SMA+ CAFs (characterized by high α-SMA and low FAP expression) align with the myCAF phenotype and function (32,33,35,36), while FAP+ CAFs (typically high in FAP but low in α-SMA) exhibit phenotypical and functional features that largely overlap with those of iCAFs (37). apCAFs are active in antigen presentation and serve a dual role in tumor immunity by engaging in both immune activation and suppression (37,38). The spatial distribution of these CAF subtypes also shows distinct features. Unlike FAP+ CAFs, α-SMA+ CAFs are predominantly localized within the peritumoral stromal region (31). apCAFs exhibit a unique compartmentalized distribution pattern, with a tendency to form organized cell clusters adjacent to tertiary lymphoid structures (37). From a cell behavior perspective, FAP expression confers distinct capabilities. FAP+ CAFs exhibit markedly higher COL contractility than FAP− CAFs and increasing FAP expression in CAFs further enhances this COL contractile capacity (39). In addition, FAP+ CAFs demonstrate superior survival adaptability relative to their FAP-negative counterparts. Experimental data show that under standard in vitro culture conditions with 10% FBS, FAP+ CAFs have markedly higher proliferative activity than CAFs with low FAP expression (40).
Recent studies have defined additional novel CAF population subgroups based on unique gene expression profiles or functions, including zinc-transporter+, S100A4+, POSTN+ and CD36+ CAFs (41,42). Table I outlines notable CAF subtypes and their key features and functions associated with tumor growth. Unlike FAP+ CAFs, most newly identified CAF subsets lack highly specific surface markers, which limits their isolation, functional characterization and therapeutic targeting (43). FAP defines a CAF cluster that encompasses both myCAF- and iCAF-like states yet shares a common molecular tag. Certain newly identified subsets such as mCAFs, PDPN+ CAFs and POSTN+ CAFs may represent further subdivisions within this framework based on differences in functional preference (31,43,44). Therefore, evaluating FAP expression status is key for future characterization of novel CAF subsets, which may not only provide an established molecular tag but also enrich the FAP+ CAF functional map while avoiding confusion arising from an overly detailed classification system.
The proportion of FAP+ CAFs undergoes dynamic shifts that are associated with clinical tumor stage (44,45). For example, in breast cancer, FAP+ CAF populations show progressive expansion during tumor progression and become the predominant CAF subset in advanced stages (46). In vitro studies have identified that several cell sources, including pericytes (12), macrophages (47), normal fibroblasts (48), mesothelial cells (49) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) (50), transdifferentiate to FAP+ CAFs. Among these, normal fibroblasts located in the peritumoral stroma may be the primary origin. In breast cancer, CD26+ normal fibroblasts transform into FAP+ CAFs, whereas CD26− normal fibroblasts differentiate into myCAFs (51). However, the primary source of FAP+ CAFs in other tumor types remains unclear. This ontological diversity of FAP+ CAFs within distinct tumor contexts may contribute to the dynamic changes in their abundance, as well as the variation in their phenotypic and functional states.
In addition to their direct origin, FAP+ CAFs arise from the trans-differentiation of other CAF subtypes. For example, CXCL14+ CAFs have been confirmed to differentiate into FAP+ CAFs (11). In renal cell carcinoma, cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 2 (CYSLTR2)+ CAFs represent a transitional cell state during phenotypic conversion toward the FAP+ CAF lineage (12). CytoTRACE analysis, a computational framework for predicting differentiation states from scRNA-seq data, indicates that among the notable CAF subtypes, FAP+ CAFs exhibit the lowest differentiation potential (11). These findings suggest FAP+ CAFs may represent a terminal state within the CAF lineage, implying a unidirectional phenotypic convergence where other CAF subtypes are more likely to convert into FAP+ CAFs than the reverse (12).
Evidence links the generation of FAP+ CAFs with elevated levels of cytokines, including TGF-β, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-17, IL-13, IL-12, IL-10, IL-6, IL-2 and IL-1 (21,52). Concurrently, environmental stressors and chemical cues constitute a critical regulatory layer that governs the phenotypic transition to a FAP+ CAF state (53,54). For example, hypoxia can induce fibroblasts to acquire inflammatory gene expression signatures and work with tumor cell-derived cytokines to promote an FAP+ CAF phenotype through hypoxia-inducible factor 1α-dependent mechanisms (53). Lactate, a key metabolic mediator that accumulates abundantly within the TME, promotes the functional transformation of MSCs into FAP+ CAFs, thereby driving tumor growth (54). Regulatory factors and cell origins of FAP+ CAFs are summarized in Table II.
To date, endogenous or pharmacological factors capable of inhibiting the generation of FAP+ CAFs remain poorly characterized. Oxytocin suppresses colorectal cancer progression, in part through the downregulation of FAP expression (55). Autophagy may be key for maintaining the FAP+ CAF phenotype within the TME (56). A deeper understanding of the mechanisms regulating the generation of FAP+ CAFs may provide avenues to remodel the stromal microenvironment by inhibiting the conversion of CAFs into a tumor-promoting state, thereby informing the development of novel therapeutic strategies.
The cell properties and spatial distribution of FAP+ CAFs enable them to mediate communication with both the surrounding stromal environment and adjacent cells, shaping tumor pathogenesis across multiple aspects. Mechanistically, the protumor effects of FAP+ CAFs are primarily attributed to three interconnected axes: Remodeling of the ECM; enhancement of malignant phenotypes in tumor cells, including proliferation, invasion and drug resistance; and induction of an immunosuppressive microenvironment (Fig. 3) (57).
Integrated transcriptomic, proteomic and functional studies have demonstrated the pro-fibrotic capacity of FAP+ CAFs, enabling efficient synthesis of key ECM components such as COL and fibronectin (27,39). FAP+ CAFs highly express the COL11A1 gene, as well as COL1A1 and COL1A2 (encoding type I COL), all of which are key components of the ECM scaffold (58). Spatial analysis in glioblastoma has confirmed that COL and fibronectin concentrations in FAP-high regions exceed those in FAP-low areas by more than threefold (59). Notably, treatment with specific FAP inhibitors (FAPIs) decreases the abnormal COL deposition (60), providing evidence for the central role of FAP+ CAFs in ECM synthesis.
In addition to contributing to ECM synthesis, FAP+ CAFs actively contract the ECM, creating a dense, rigid TME that blocks immune cell infiltration and promotes immune evasion (39,61). However, tumor cells are not constrained by this barrier as they can remodel the surrounding matrix and create paths for invasion within the dense ECM through upregulated matrix metalloproteinases and activated integrin signaling pathways (62). FAP+ CAFs alter ECM ultrastructure, enabling functional tissue reorganization that favors tumor cell metastasis. For example, in vitro 3D culture models have revealed that FAP+ CAFs align ECM fibers into parallel, linear topographical cues, which markedly promotes both the efficiency and directional persistence of cancer cell invasion (63,64). This organized alignment is not observed in the matrix adjacent to other CAF subsets (64). Selectively inhibiting the dipeptidyl peptidase activity of FAP using a chemical inhibitor (naphthalenecarboxy-Gly-boroPro) notably suppresses parallel matrix alignment and results in a randomly oriented matrix structure, suggesting that the enzymatic activity of FAP serves a decisive role in matrix remodeling (64).
Beyond remodeling the ECM to provide a physical scaffold for tumor growth, FAP+ CAFs promote angiogenesis to support the nutrient and oxygen supply (43,65). Positioned within the perivascular niche and establishing close spatial association with endothelial cells, FAP+ CAFs drive the formation of new blood vessels by secreting VEGF, which sustains the activation of canonical pro-angiogenic signaling pathways in endothelial cells (43). These matrix-remodeling and pro-angiogenic functions act synergistically to form the structural foundation of the tumor microenvironment.
The regulation of malignant cells by FAP+ CAFs involves multiple signaling pathways and biological processes, as supported by both in vitro and in vivo experimental models (66-68). In both 3D spheroid assays and tumor-bearing mice, FAP+ CAFs notably promote the proliferation and invasion of ovarian cancer cells compared with their FAP− counterparts (39). Conditioned medium derived from FAP+ CAFs increases migration and invasion in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma cells (43), as well as the migration, survival and drug resistance in gastric cancer cells (67). Indirect co-culture with FAP+ CAFs promotes proliferation in pancreatic cancer cells via inactivation of the cell cycle inhibitor retinoblastoma (68). These findings demonstrate that FAP+ CAFs secrete soluble factors that enhance malignant phenotypes in tumor cells. Some of these factors are cytokines that are highly expressed in FAP+ CAFs, including CCL2, IL-6, IL-8, CXCL12, growth factors (VEGF and insulin-like growth factor family members) and chemokines (69,70). For example, in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, FAP+ CAFs activate the CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling pathway, which induces tumor cell proliferation, invasion and migration (71). In colon cancer, FAP+ CAFs exhibit aberrant activation of Wnt signaling, which leads to the enhanced secretion of fibroblast growth factor 20 (FGF20), a ligand that binds FGF receptor on cancer cells and activates PI3K/Akt signaling to promote tumor metastasis (72). FAP has been proposed to participate in regulating these cytokines (69) (Fig. 4). A notable positive association has been observed between FAP expression and the secretion of multiple cytokines, and suppressing FAP markedly decreases the secretion of IL-6, IL-8, and CCL2 (69). To the best of our knowledge, however, few studies have reported the potential mechanisms of FAP-mediated cytokine regulation in CAFs (73-75). FAP can promote the aggregation of the catalytic subunit of DNA-dependent protein kinase within lipid rafts, where it forms a stabilizing complex that increases Akt/NF-κB activation and may upregulate expression of downstream key cytokines such as CCL2, TNF-α and IL-8 (74,76). FAP can persistently activate STAT3 and facilitate its binding to the CCL2 promoter through a urokinase plasminogen activator receptor-dependent FAK/Src/JAK2 signaling cascade, thereby leading to increased CCL2 synthesis (7). Another potential mechanism for FAP-mediated cytokine secretion involves autocrine release of sFAP. sFAP can bind to enolase 1 on the cell membrane and activate the NF-κB pathway, which is known to regulate the secretion of multiple inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8 (75). Abundant in the supernatant of FAP+ CAFs, sFAP directly activates the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway in neighboring cancer cells, leading to epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) (49). In gastric cancer, sFAP activates the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in tumor cells in a dose-dependent manner, inducing EMT and enhancing cancer cell proliferation and migration (77).
In addition, other secreted factors highly expressed in FAP+ CAFs have been implicated in the mediation of tumor cell phenotypes (30,78,79). For example, FAP upregulates the secretion of versican in FAP+ CAFs, which activates the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in bladder cancer cells to induce EMT (78). In ovarian cancer, secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor is highly expressed in FAP+ CAFs and enhances the proliferation, migration, invasion and adhesion of ovarian cancer cells (30). Compared with FAP− CAFs, FAP+ CAFs transfer a greater quantity of specific long non-coding RNAs via exosomes to esophageal squamous carcinoma cells, thereby enhancing radio-resistance by improving the DNA damage repair capacity of cancer cells (79).
As aforementioned, the tendency of FAP+ CAFs to localize at the tumor margin places them in proximity to immune cells recruited from distant sites. Through the secretion of bioactive factors or direct cell-cell contact, FAP+ CAFs constitute a functionally immunosuppressive CAF subpopulation within the TME (80). Briefly, FAP+ CAFs mediate immunosuppression through two primary mechanisms: Suppressing the abundance and/or function of anti-tumor immune cells such as effector T and natural killer (NK) cells (12,70) and recruiting immunosuppressive cell populations, including regulatory T cells (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), neutrophils and tumor-associated macrophages (70,81).
T cells co-cultured with FAP+ CAFs show decreased expression of granzyme B and IFN-γ, indicating a direct suppressive effect of FAP+ CAFs on T cell function (67). FAP+ CAFs can enhance the release of nitric oxide and thereby suppress the expansion of activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (82). In addition, numerous cytokines modulated by FAP expression are involved in immune regulation. For example, FAP+ CAFs can promote the attraction of CD4+CD25+ T lymphocytes via CXCL12 and their differentiation into Tregs (83). IL-6 derived from FAP+ CAFs enhance Treg survival and increase their proportion (26). FAP+ CAFs induce MDSC recruitment into tumors through CCL2, which contributes to the reduced levels of functional molecules such as IL-2 and granzyme B in effector T cells (70). FAP is also involved in the polarization of macrophages from an anti-tumor (M1) to a pro-tumor (M2) phenotype (84). FAP promotes the secretion of fibronectin 1, triggering FAK/Akt/STAT3 signaling in macrophages and driving their polarization toward an immunosuppressive M2-like phenotype (13). These immunosuppressive cells recruited by FAP+ CAFs not only directly suppress T cell function, but also form an interactive network with FAP+ CAFs that continuously amplifies the immunosuppressive state within the TME. For example, upon arrival at the tumor area, tumor-associated macrophages can release paracrine factors such as TGF-β, PDGF and adrenomedullin to enhance the proliferation and tumor-promoting activity of FAP+ CAFs (25). FAP elevates PD-L1 expression on CAFs, contributing to CD8+ T cell exhaustion (85). Mechanistically, FAP enhances PD-L1 levels by inhibiting the degradation of STAT1, an upstream positive regulator of PD-L1 transcription (85). Moreover, FAP+ CAFs produce more lactate than FAP− CAFs by upregulating LINC01711, which promotes lactate dehydrogenase A phosphorylation, and monocarboxylate transporter 4 expression, which mediates lactate secretion (86). This metabolic feature creates an acidic TME that impairs CD8+ T cell infiltration and function (86).
Although FAP may not directly regulate all of the aforementioned pro-tumorigenic or immunosuppressive factors and the observed co-expression may simply a coincidental signature of activated CAFs, FAP expression defines a CAF subset that serves a role in promoting tumor progression (71,79,86). As a critical mediator of FAP+ CAF-driven tumor promotion, FAP acts as an enzyme and modulates cytokine and signaling networks, thereby reshaping the stromal architecture and sustaining crosstalk with tumor cells and other components within the TME (54,85,87).
FAP+ CAFs are a key CAF subtype with growing clinical relevance (25,88,89). Accumulating evidence demonstrates that their abundance shows no significant association with basic demographic characteristics such as patient sex or age (77,90), whereas elevated infiltration of FAP+ CAFs indicates enhanced tumor malignancy and increased progression risk (24). Table III summarizes the association between FAP+ CAFs and clinicopathological features across cancer types.
Apart from their role in reflecting tumor progression, FAP+ CAFs demonstrate potential for dynamically monitoring treatment response. In patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer, chemotherapy leads to a marked reduction in the relative proportion of FAP+ CAFs despite an overall increase in stromal content, indicating their specific vulnerability to cytotoxic agents (91). Parallel evidence emerges from immunotherapy studies: In colorectal cancer, enrichment of FAP+ CAFs is negatively associated with response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICBs) (21,24). Longitudinal changes in FAP+ CAF abundance during treatment are associated with both progression-free and overall survival (31). Collectively, these lines of evidence establish FAP+ CAFs as promising pan-cancer biomarkers for monitoring therapeutic efficacy across multiple treatment modalities.
The distinct upregulation of FAP in malignant tissues compared with adjacent normal regions makes FAP an ideal target for tumor mapping. Concurrently, its key role in promoting tumor growth underscores its potential as a therapeutic target. These attributes have spurred development of FAP-directed ligands, antibodies and FAPIs for both diagnostic and therapeutic applications (92,93).
For precise tumor localization, FAP-targeting molecules are conjugated with fluorophores or radionuclides such as 68Ga, 18F and 89Zr, enabling high-contrast visualization through advanced imaging techniques including PET and single photon emission CT (92,94). Several FAP-targeted imaging agents have been developed and show superior diagnostic performance in preclinical studies across a range of malignancies (95,96). For example, 89Zr-labeled FAP IgG exhibits high uptake in both subcutaneous tumors and bone metastases, with detectable signals persisting for up to 72 h post-injection, thereby providing an extended window for PET/CT imaging (92). Intravenous administration of 68Ga-labeled FAPI is well-tolerated, and its biodistribution is associated with FAP expression across cancer types (96). Notably, compared with ¹8F-fluorodeoxyglucose, 68Ga-FAPI displays superior tumor-to-background ratios and prolonged retention across diverse tumor entities. Moreover, 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT shows enhanced sensitivity in detecting early metastatic lesions (97). Nevertheless, certain types of benign disease may also exhibit high FAP expression, leading to non-specific FAPI uptake that may be misinterpreted as malignant lesions.
For therapeutic applications, FAPIs, antibodies and peptides are conjugated with therapeutic radionuclides such as 188Re, 177Lu, 225Ac and 90Y (98,99). The physical half-lives of these radionuclides align with the biological retention times of FAP-directed molecules in tumors, creating opportunities for targeted endoradiotherapy (100). For example, 177Lu-labeled FAP-2286 (a FAP-binding peptide) exhibits favorable tumor uptake and symptom improvement in patients with rapidly progressing adenocarcinoma (98). In a subset of patients with advanced thyroid cancer and high FAP expression, 177Lu-labeled FAPI derivatives markedly decrease bone and lymph node metastases (99). To date, FAP-targeted radioligand therapy has shown manageable side effects, including infrequent and reversible hematological toxicities as well as self-limiting headache and nausea (98). However, whether long-term therapy may cause adverse effects remains unclear, highlighting the need for additional data to assess its efficacy and safety.
FAP-targeted phototherapy is a treatment modality that can selectively eliminate localized lesions upon light exposure while avoiding systemic radiation exposure. FAP-IR700, a conjugate of FAP ligands with novel photosensitive dye IR700, can insert into adjacent lipid bilayers upon near-infrared light irradiation and causes cell membrane rupture, thereby selectively eliminating CAFs (101).
In the aforementioned therapeutic approaches, the structural design of FAP ligands is key as it directly affects pharmacokinetics, tumor uptake, clearance and therapeutic outcome. Modifying FAP ligands with chemical groups, such as amide bonds, can improve their binding affinity to cell surface FAP (93). Structural optimization of FAP-targeted pharmaceuticals, such as conjugation with albumin-binding domains or fatty acids, can enhance tumor uptake and prolong retention and therapeutic effect (99,102). Furthermore, enhancing selectivity is a key objective to mitigate off-target toxicity by minimizing the interaction of FAP-targeted drugs and normal cells with low FAP expression.
FAP-CAR T cells drive a beneficial remodeling of TME through the dual mechanism of FAP+ CAF depletion and T cell activation. Systemic administration of FAP-CAR T cells effectively suppresses tumor growth in mouse models of ovarian and lung cancer (103,104). In both human lung cancer xenografts and murine desmoplastic pancreatic tumors, selective depletion of FAP+ CAFs by FAP-CAR T cells decreases the deposition of COL and glycosaminoglycans in the ECM, suppresses angiogenesis and notably inhibits tumor growth (105). A comparative study further revealed that FAP-CAR T cells exhibit superior anti-tumor efficacy relative to CAR T cells targeting a tumor-cell antigen (mesothelin) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma models (106). Mechanistically, the elimination of FAP+ CAFs inhibits tumor growth by disrupting the structural integrity of the desmoplastic matrix and enhancing the infiltration of endogenous CD8+ T and NK cells (106).
Although FAP-targeted therapy has shown efficacy in preclinical animal studies, its monotherapy offers limited clinical benefit (99,107,108). FAP-targeted monotherapy leads to increased FAP levels in some patients at late stages of treatment, suggesting the emergence of treatment resistance (109). A potential explanation is that FAP− CAFs survive during treatment and convert into and expand as FAP+ CAFs under the influence of other factors in the TME. Recently, growing evidence indicates that combining FAP+ CAF-targeting strategies with immunotherapy can produce combined effects and decrease drug resistance (110-112). In mouse models of colon cancer, FAP-targeted radiotherapy alone shows substantial activity, whereas its combination with anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy leads to complete eradication of all transplanted tumors (108,110). In gastric cancer, FAP-targeted therapy downregulates PD-L1 expression and upregulates immunostimulatory cytokines, including IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, IFN-γ and TNF-α, thereby sensitizing tumors to anti-PD-1 therapy (67). Furthermore, FAP-directed antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) enhance the antitumor activity of ICBs by promoting the intratumoral infiltration of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells (113). Additionally, combination of FAP-CAR T cells and anti-PD-1 therapy can exert a combined antitumor effect in pancreatic cancer by promoting endogenous CD8+ T cell recruitment (114,115). FAP-targeting strategies also exhibit antitumor activity when combined with chemotherapeutic agents such as gemcitabine and paclitaxel (113,116). For example, although tumor regrowth may occur following FAP-targeted ADC monotherapy, its combination with gemcitabine induces more durable tumor regression (113). Moreover, the combination of a FAP-targeted radioligand with an IL-2 antibody produces stronger antitumor effects compared with either agent alone (117).
FAP is a classic surface marker of CAFs. FAP+ CAFs defined by high FAP expression have drawn particular interest among CAF subsets (12,13,88). Their unique tumor distribution, fluctuating abundance and the dual enzymatic and non-enzymatic functions of their signature molecule FAP collectively underscore the key role of this subset in tumor progression. FAP engages other membrane proteins to participate in the activation of multiple intracellular signaling pathways as well as the regulation of cytokines and cellular proliferation and metabolism (87,118). Nevertheless, understanding of how FAP regulates CAF function and tumor progression remains incomplete. A challenge in understanding FAP+ CAF biology is the instability of FAP expression under continuous in vitro culture conditions. Studies have reported a gradual downregulation of FAP expression in CAFs during extended culture periods (18,119). Using early-passage (passages 2-5) FAP+ CAFs for experiments can minimize the impact of artificial culture conditions on cell characteristics (39). Alternatively, doxycycline treatment can be used to induce FAP expression in fibroblasts in vitro, which maintains stable expression for >10 days (64).
Despite FAP remaining a promising pan-cancer therapeutic target in clinical translation, its efficacy is limited in certain patients. This may be attributed to a low baseline proportion of FAP+ CAFs within the tumor tissue. Careful assessment of both tumoral and baseline FAP expression in normal tissues is of critical importance when selecting and implementing FAP-targeted therapeutic strategies. Understanding of the mechanisms regulating FAP production and its downstream signaling pathways may facilitate the identification of more effective targets for future FAP+ CAF-directed therapy.
Notably, studies have revealed that FAP+ CAFs exhibit functional preferences across different cancer types and tumor stages (32,72), suggesting that there may be other signals independent of FAP within FAP+ CAFs that participate in the regulation of tumor survival. Studies have aimed to classify FAP+ CAFs into more refined subsets through combinatorial biomarker profiling (120,121). For example, anthrax toxin receptor 1-positive FAP+ CAFs in ovarian cancer following chemotherapy can effectively suppress CD8+ T cell function through YAP1 signaling (91). In breast and gastric cancer, a FAP+ CD10+ G-protein-coupled receptor 77 (GPR77)+ CAF subpopulation is associated with the development of chemotherapy resistance (122). Thus, targeting FAP alone may be insufficient to suppress these FAP+ CAF subsets whose pro-tumorigenic functions rely on alternative parallel signaling pathways. Elucidating the mechanisms of such specialized subsets is key for the precise functional targeting of FAP+ CAFs, thereby enabling more durable tumor suppression.
Not applicable.
ZT conceived the study and wrote the manuscript. ZZ constructed tables and figures. YW and JH reviewed and edited the manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
|
FAP |
fibroblast activation protein |
|
ECM |
extracellular matrix |
|
TME |
tumor microenvironment |
|
ap |
antigen-presenting |
|
iCAF |
inflammatory cancer-associated fibroblast |
|
my |
myofibroblastic |
Not applicable.
No funding was received.
|
Paget S: The distribution of secondary growths in cancer of the breast. 1889. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 8:98–101. 1989.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Noh MH, Kang JM, Miller AA, Nguyen G, Huang M, Shim JS, Bueso-Perez AJ, Murphy SA, Rivera-Caraballo KA, Otani Y, et al: Targeting IGF2 to reprogram the tumor microenvironment for enhanced viro-immunotherapy. Neuro Oncol. 26:1602–1616. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kung HC, Zheng KW, Zimmerman JW and Zheng L: The tumour microenvironment in pancreatic cancer-new clinical challenges, but more opportunities. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 22:969–995. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li Y, Zheng Y, Huang J, Nie RC, Wu QN, Zuo Z, Yuan S, Yu K, Liang CC, Pan YQ, et al: CAF-macrophage crosstalk in tumour microenvironments governs the response to immune checkpoint blockade in gastric cancer peritoneal metastases. Gut. 74:350–363. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
|
Sahai E, Astsaturov I, Cukierman E, DeNardo DG, Egeblad M, Evans RM, Fearon D, Greten FR, Hingorani SR, Hunter T, et al: A framework for advancing our understanding of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Nat Rev Cancer. 20:174–186. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Nurmik M, Ullmann P, Rodriguez F, Haan S and Letellier E: In search of definitions: Cancer-associated fibroblasts and their markers. Int J Cancer. 146:895–905. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
|
Yang X, Lin Y, Shi Y, Li B, Liu W, Yin W, Dang Y, Chu Y, Fan J and He R: FAP promotes immunosuppression by cancer-associated fibroblasts in the tumor microenvironment via STAT3-CCL2 signaling. Cancer Res. 76:4124–4135. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ogawa Y, Masugi Y, Abe T, Yamazaki K, Ueno A, Fujii-Nishimura Y, Hori S, Yagi H, Abe Y, Kitago M and Sakamoto M: Three distinct stroma types in human pancreatic cancer identified by image analysis of fibroblast subpopulations and collagen. Clin Cancer Res. 27:107–119. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
McAndrews KM, Chen Y, Darpolor JK, Zheng X, Yang S, Carstens JL, Li B, Wang H, Miyake T, Correa de Sampaio P, et al: Identification of functional heterogeneity of carcinoma-associated fibroblasts with distinct IL6-mediated therapy resistance in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Discov. 12:1580–1597. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hamson EJ, Keane FM, Tholen S, Schilling O and Gorrell MD: Understanding fibroblast activation protein (FAP): Substrates, activities, expression and targeting for cancer therapy. Proteomics Clin Appl. 8:454–463. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Su Z, He Y, You L, Chen J, Zhang G and Liu Z: SPP1+ macrophages and FAP+ fibroblasts promote the progression of pMMR gastric cancer. Sci Rep. 14:262212024. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ma J, Huang Y, Chen J, Li Y, Yao R, Li X, Liang Q, Chen X, Peng C, Liu K, et al: FAP+ fibroblasts orchestrate tumor microenvironment remodeling in renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus. Nat Commun. 16:93872025. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Chen W, Jiang M, Zou X, Chen Z, Shen L, Hu J, Kong M, Huang J, Ni C and Xia W: Fibroblast activation protein (FAP)+ cancer-associated fibroblasts induce macrophage M2-like polarization via the fibronectin 1-integrin α5β1 axis in breast cancer. Oncogene. 44:2396–2412. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jia H, Chen X, Zhang L and Chen M: Cancer associated fibroblasts in cancer development and therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 18:362025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhu H, Wu J, Xu Z, Pei Y, Jing Z, Zhou J, Feng R and Liu J: Fibroblast activation protein promotes thoracic aortic dissection via PLAUR/ITGB1-mediated pro-inflammatory macrophage polarization. Adv Sci (Weinh). 13:e147862026. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hemmingsen JK, Enemark MH, Pedersen AKN, Sørensen EF, Lauridsen KL, Løhde JB, d'Amore F, Hamilton-Dutoit SJ, Bjerre M and Ludvigsen M: Reduced activity of soluble fibroblast activation protein (sFAP) represents a biomarker of aggressive disease in lymphoid malignancies. Int J Mol Sci. 26:112482025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Solano-Iturri JD, Beitia M, Errarte P, Calvete-Candenas J, Etxezarraga MC, Loizate A, Echevarria E, Badiola I and Larrinaga G: Altered expression of fibroblast activation protein-α (FAP) in colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence and in lymph node and liver metastases. Aging (Albany NY). 12:10337–10358. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ebert LM, Yu W, Gargett T, Toubia J, Kollis PM, Tea MN, Ebert BW, Bardy C, van den Hurk M, Bonder CS, et al: Endothelial, pericyte and tumor cell expression in glioblastoma identifies fibroblast activation protein (FAP) as an excellent target for immunotherapy. Clin Transl Immunology. 9:e11912020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhen Z, Tang W, Wang M, Zhou S, Wang H, Wu Z, Hao Z, Li Z, Liu L and Xie J: Protein nanocage mediated fibroblast-activation protein targeted photoimmunotherapy to enhance cytotoxic T cell infiltration and tumor control. Nano Lett. 17:862–869. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Arnold JN, Magiera L, Kraman M and Fearon DT: Tumoral immune suppression by macrophages expressing fibroblast activation protein-α and heme oxygenase-1. Cancer Immunol Res. 2:121–126. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kraxner A, Braun F, Cheng WY, Yang TO, Pipaliya S, Canamero M, Andersson E, Harring SV, Dziadek S, Bröske AE, et al: Investigating the complex interplay between fibroblast activation protein α-positive cancer associated fibroblasts and the tumor microenvironment in the context of cancer immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 15:13526322024. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Cheng Y, Chen X, Feng L, Yang Z, Xiao L, Xiang B, Wang X, Liu D, Lin P, Shi J, et al: Stromal architecture and fibroblast subpopulations with opposing effects on outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Discov. 11:12025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pontén F, Gry M, Fagerberg L, Lundberg E, Asplund A, Berglund L, Oksvold P, Björling E, Hober S, Kampf C, et al: A global view of protein expression in human cells, tissues, and organs. Mol Syst Biol. 5:3372009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Qi J, Sun H, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Xun Z, Li Z, Ding X, Bao R, Hong L, Jia W, et al: Single-cell and spatial analysis reveal interaction of FAP+ fibroblasts and SPP1+ macrophages in colorectal cancer. Nat Commun. 13:17422022. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Long F, Zhong W, Zhao F, Xu Y, Hu X, Jia G, Huang L, Yi K, Wang N, Si H, et al: DAB2 + macrophages support FAP + fibroblasts in shaping tumor barrier and inducing poor clinical outcomes in liver cancer. Theranostics. 14:4822–4843. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Givel AM, Kieffer Y, Scholer-Dahirel A, Sirven P, Cardon M, Pelon F, Magagna I, Gentric G, Costa A, Bonneau C, et al: miR200-regulated CXCL12β promotes fibroblast heterogeneity and immunosuppression in ovarian cancers. Nat Commun. 9:10562018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Jian Q, Li Y, Duan W, Yang J, Zheng Z, Xie Q, Yu J, Sun B, Deng Y, He L and Liu S: Hypoxia-induced ADAM8+ macrophages and FAP+ fibroblasts form an extracellular matrix-remodeling niche at the tumor boundary in HCC. Cancer Immunol Res. May 13–2026.Epub ahead of print. | |
|
Fan G, Tang L, Xie T, Yang M, Li L, Yang S, Xing P, Han X and Shi Y: DSG2+ cancer stem cells co-located with FAP+ myofibroblasts in the tumor boundary that determines the efficacy of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. Adv Sci (Weinh). 13:e145432026. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Öhlund D, Handly-Santana A, Biffi G, Elyada E, Almeida AS, Ponz-Sarvise M, Corbo V, Oni TE, Hearn SA, Lee EJ, et al: Distinct populations of inflammatory fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in pancreatic cancer. J Exp Med. 214:579–596. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sun L, Ke M, Wang X, Yin M, Wei J, Xu L, Tian X, Wang F, Zhang H, Fu S and Zhang C: FAPhigh α-SMAlow cancerassociated fibroblast-derived SLPI protein encapsulated in extracellular vesicles promotes ovarian cancer development via activation of PI3K/AKT and downstream signaling pathways. Mol Carcinog. 61:910–923. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mathieson L, Koppensteiner L, Dorward DA, O'Connor RA and Akram AR: Cancer-associated fibroblasts expressing fibroblast activation protein and podoplanin in non-small cell lung cancer predict poor clinical outcome. Br J Cancer. 130:1758–1769. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Croizer H, Mhaidly R, Kieffer Y, Gentric G, Djerroudi L, Leclere R, Pelon F, Robley C, Bohec M, Meng A, et al: Deciphering the spatial landscape and plasticity of immunosuppressive fibroblasts in breast cancer. Nat Commun. 15:28062024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Xu K, Wang H, Zou YX, Zhang HH, Wang YN, Ren XR, Wang HQ, Xu YH, Li JJ, Tang H, et al: Distinct fibroblast subpopulations associated with bone, brain or intrapulmonary metastasis in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Transl Med. 14:e16052024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Blanke ML, Salachan PV, Georgsen JB, Fredsøe J, Ulhøi B, Borre M and Sørensen KD: Cancer-associated fibroblast subtypes in the tumor microenvironment of prostate cancer and associations to patient outcomes. J Pathol. 268:413–427. 2026. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ding L, Fu Y, Zhu N, Zhao M, Ding Z, Zhang X, Song Y, Jing Y, Zhang Q, Chen S, et al: OXTRHigh stroma fibroblasts control the invasion pattern of oral squamous cell carcinoma via ERK5 signaling. Nat Commun. 13:51242022. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Muchlińska A, Nagel A, Popęda M, Szade J, Niemira M, Zieliński J, Skokowski J, Bednarz-Knoll N and Żaczek AJ: Alpha-smooth muscle actin-positive cancer-associated fibroblasts secreting osteopontin promote growth of luminal breast cancer. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 27:452022. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Song J, Wei R, Liu C, Zhao Z and Liu X, Wang Y, Liu F and Liu X: Antigen-presenting cancer associated fibroblasts enhance antitumor immunity and predict immunotherapy response. Nat Commun. 16:21752025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Huang H, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Pradhan RN, Ganguly D, Chandra R, Murimwa G, Wright S, Gu X, Maddipati R, et al: Mesothelial cell-derived antigen-presenting cancer-associated fibroblasts induce expansion of regulatory T cells in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Cell. 40:656–673.e7. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Hussain A, Voisin V, Poon S, Karamboulas C, Bui NHB, Meens J, Dmytryshyn J, Ho VW, Tang KH, Paterson J, et al: Distinct fibroblast functional states drive clinical outcomes in ovarian cancer and are regulated by TCF21. J Exp Med. 217:e201910942020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Bagger MM, Sjölund J, Kim J, Kohler KT, Villadsen R, Jafari A, Kassem M, Pietras K, Rønnov-Jessen L and Petersen OW: Evidence of steady-state fibroblast subtypes in the normal human breast as cells-of-origin for perturbed-state fibroblasts in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 26:112024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Han C, Liu T and Yin R: Biomarkers for cancer-associated fibroblasts. Biomark Res. 8:642020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Friedman G, Levi-Galibov O, David E, Bornstein C, Giladi A, Dadiani M, Mayo A, Halperin C, Pevsner-Fischer M, Lavon H, et al: Cancer-associated fibroblast compositions change with breast cancer progression linking the ratio of S100A4+ and PDPN+ CAFs to clinical outcome. Nat Cancer. 1:692–708. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cai Z, Chen L, Chen S, Fang R, Chen X and Lei W: Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals pro-invasive cancer-associated fibroblasts in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Commun Signal. 21:2922023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang H, Liang Y, Liu Z, Zhang R, Chao J, Wang M, Liu M, Qiao L, Xuan Z, Zhao H and Lu L: POSTN+ cancer-associated fibroblasts determine the efficacy of immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer. 12:e0087212024. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Li C, Guo H, Zhai P, Yan M, Liu C, Wang X, Shi C, Li J, Tong T, Zhang Z, et al: Spatial and single-cell transcriptomics reveal a cancer-associated fibroblast subset in HNSCC that restricts infiltration and antitumor activity of CD8+ T cells. Cancer Res. 84:258–275. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
|
Venning FA, Zornhagen KW, Wullkopf L, Sjölund J, Rodriguez-Cupello C, Kjellman P, Morsing M, Hajkarim MC, Won KJ, Erler JT and Madsen CD: Deciphering the temporal heterogeneity of cancer-associated fibroblast subpopulations in breast cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 40:1752021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Iwamoto C, Ohuchida K, Shinkawa T, Okuda S, Otsubo Y, Okumura T, Sagara A, Koikawa K, Ando Y, Shindo K, et al: Bone marrow-derived macrophages converted into cancer-associated fibroblast-like cells promote pancreatic cancer progression. Cancer Lett. 512:15–27. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhao Y, Jia Y, Wang J, Chen X, Han J, Zhen S, Yin S, Lv W, Yu F, Wang J, et al: circNOX4 activates an inflammatory fibroblast niche to promote tumor growth and metastasis in NSCLC via FAP/IL-6 axis. Mol Cancer. 23:472024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wu H, Xiang Z, Huang G, He Q, Song J, Dou R, Yang C, Wang S and Xiong B: BGN/FAP/STAT3 positive feedback loop mediated mutual interaction between tumor cells and mesothelial cells contributes to peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer. Int J Biol Sci. 19:465–483. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Gong L, Li G, Yi X, Han Q, Wu Q, Ying F, Shen L, Cao Y, Liu X, Gao L, et al: Tumor-derived small extracellular vesicles facilitate omental metastasis of ovarian cancer by triggering activation of mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Commun Signal. 22:472024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Houthuijzen JM, de Bruijn R, van der Burg E, Drenth AP, Wientjens E, Filipovic T, Bullock E, Brambillasca CS, Pulver EM, Nieuwland M, et al: CD26-negative and CD26-positive tissue-resident fibroblasts contribute to functionally distinct CAF subpopulations in breast cancer. Nat Commun. 14:1832023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhu GQ, Tang Z, Huang R, Qu WF, Fang Y, Yang R, Tao CY, Gao J, Wu XL, Sun HX, et al: CD36+ cancer-associated fibroblasts provide immunosuppressive microenvironment for hepatocellular carcinoma via secretion of macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Cell Discov. 9:252023. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Schwörer S, Cimino FV, Ros M, Tsanov KM, Ng C, Lowe SW, Carmona-Fontaine C and Thompson CB: Hypoxia potentiates the inflammatory fibroblast phenotype promoted by pancreatic cancer cell-derived cytokines. Cancer Res. 83:1596–1610. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Huang C, Liu T, Zhao Y, Wang M, Wang D, Shen B, Zhu W and Sun L: Histone H4K8 lactylation modulated immunosuppressive properties by promoting FAP transcription and ECM remodeling. Gastric Cancer. 29:70–82. 2026. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ma M, Li L, Chen H and Feng Y: Oxytocin inhibition of metastatic colorectal cancer by suppressing the expression of fibroblast activation protein-α. Front Neurosci. 13:13172019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Bai J, Liu T, Tu B, Yuan M, Shu Z, Fan M, Huo S, Guo Y, Wang L, Wang H and Zhao Y: Autophagy loss impedes cancer-associated fibroblast activation via downregulating proline biosynthesis. Autophagy. 19:632–643. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
|
Qin P, Chen H, Wang Y, Huang L, Huang K, Xiao G, Han C, Hu J, Lin D, Wan X, et al: Cancer-associated fibroblasts undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy suppress rectal cancer revealed by single-cell and spatial transcriptomics. Cell Rep Med. 4:1012312023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Qin Y, Miyake T, Muramoto K, Maekawa T, Nishina Y, Wang Y, Shimizu T and Tani M: Fibroblast activation protein-α expression in cancer-associated fibroblasts shows the poor survival of colorectal cancer via immune-mediated pathways: Implications of FAP in cancer-associated fibroblasts link immune dysregulation to adverse survival in colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 32:1941–1952. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Vymola P, Garcia-Borja E, Cervenka J, Balaziova E, Vymolova B, Veprkova J, Vodicka P, Skalnikova H, Tomas R, Netuka D, et al: Fibrillar extracellular matrix produced by pericyte-like cells facilitates glioma cell dissemination. Brain Pathol. 34:e132652024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yang AT, Kim YO, Yan XZ, Abe H, Aslam M, Park KS, Zhao XY, Jia JD, Klein T, You H and Schuppan D: Fibroblast activation protein activates macrophages and promotes parenchymal liver inflammation and fibrosis. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 15:841–867. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
|
Ma B, Ma C, Long X and Jiang L: Stromal reprogramming in urachal cancer: Fibroblast activation protein and collagen remodeling drive immune-suppressive niches and immunotherapy resistance. Int Immunopharmacol. 163:1152042025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Bukhari M, Patel N, Fontana R, Santiago-Medina M, Jiang Y, Li D, Pestonjamasp K, Christiansen VJ, Jackson KW, McKee PA and Yang J: Fibroblast activation protein drives tumor metastasis via a protease-independent role in invadopodia stabilization. Cell Rep. 42:1133022023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Parikainen M, Suwal U, Rappu P, Heino J and Sahlgren CM: Jagged1 regulates extracellular matrix deposition and remodeling in triple-negative breast cancer. Sci Adv. 12:eaea95622026. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lee HO, Mullins SR, Franco-Barraza J, Valianou M, Cukierman E and Cheng JD: FAP-overexpressing fibroblasts produce an extracellular matrix that enhances invasive velocity and directionality of pancreatic cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 11:2452011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sun X, Cai W, Li H, Gao C, Ma X, Guo Y, Fu D, Xiao D, Zhang Z, Wang Y, et al: Endothelial-like cancer-associated fibroblasts facilitate pancreatic cancer metastasis via vasculogenic mimicry and paracrine signalling. Gut. 74:1437–1451. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wu J, Liu B, Chen S, Xin J and Wang M: Stromal FAP+ cancer associated fibroblasts orchestrate a pro-tumorigenic niche with malignant proliferative stemness and cancer progression. Clin Transl Med. 16:e706882026. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Wen X, He X, Jiao F, Wang C, Sun Y, Ren X and Li Q: Fibroblast activation protein-α-positive fibroblasts promote gastric cancer progression and resistance to immune checkpoint blockade. Oncol Res. 25:629–640. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kawase T, Yasui Y, Nishina S, Hara Y, Yanatori I, Tomiyama Y, Nakashima Y, Yoshida K, Kishi F, Nakamura M and Hino K: Fibroblast activation protein-α-expressing fibroblasts promote the progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. BMC Gastroenterol. 15:1092015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Higashino N, Koma YI, Hosono M, Takase N, Okamoto M, Kodaira H, Nishio M, Shigeoka M, Kakeji Y and Yokozaki H: Fibroblast activation protein-positive fibroblasts promote tumor progression through secretion of CCL2 and interleukin-6 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Lab Invest. 99:777–792. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chen L, Qiu X, Wang X and He J: FAP positive fibroblasts induce immune checkpoint blockade resistance in colorectal cancer via promoting immunosuppression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 487:8–14. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Duan L, Cao S, Zhao F, Du X, Gao Z, Wang X and Bian F: Effects of FAP+ fibroblasts on cell proliferation migration and immunoregulation of esophageal squamous carcinoma cells through the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis. Mol Cell Biochem. 480:3841–3855. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Furuhashi S, Bustos MA, Mizuno S, Ryu S, Naeini Y, Bilchik AJ and Hoon DSB: Spatial profiling of cancer-associated fibroblasts of sporadic early onset colon cancer microenvironment. NPJ Precis Oncol. 7:1182023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Fang L, Che Y, Zhang C, Huang J, Lei Y, Lu Z, Sun N and He J: PLAU directs conversion of fibroblasts to inflammatory cancer-associated fibroblasts, promoting esophageal squamous cell carcinoma progression via uPAR/Akt/NF-κB/IL8 pathway. Cell Death Discov. 7:322021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Li B, Ding Z, Calbay O, Li Y, Li T, Jin L and Huang S: FAP is critical for ovarian cancer cell survival by sustaining NF-κB activation through recruitment of PRKDC in lipid rafts. Cancer Gene Ther. 30:608–621. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
|
Yuan Z, Hu H, Zhu Y, Zhang W, Fang Q, Qiao T, Ma T, Wang M, Huang R, Tang Q, et al: Colorectal cancer cell intrinsic fibroblast activation protein alpha binds to Enolase1 and activates NF-κB pathway to promote metastasis. Cell Death Dis. 12:5432021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zhao Z, Sun H, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Wang X, Wang X, Tan C, Ni S, Weng W, Zhang M, et al: PDPN+ cancer-associated fibroblasts enhance gastric cancer angiogenesis via AKT/NF-κB activation and the CCL2-ACKR1 axis. MedComm (2020). 6:e700372025. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Liu J, Huang C, Peng C, Xu F, Li Y, Yutaka Y, Xiong B and Yang X: Stromal fibroblast activation protein alpha promotes gastric cancer progression via epithelial-mesenchymal transition through Wnt/β-catenin pathway. BMC Cancer. 18:10992018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ping Q, Wang C, Cheng X, Zhong Y, Yan R, Yang M, Shi Y, Li X, Li X, Huang W, et al: TGF-β1 dominates stromal fibroblast-mediated EMT via the FAP/VCAN axis in bladder cancer cells. J Transl Med. 21:4752023. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zhou X, Tong Y, Yu C, Pu J, Zhu W, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Xiong Y and Sun X: FAP positive cancer-associated fibroblasts promote tumor progression and radioresistance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by transferring exosomal lncRNA AFAP1-AS1. Mol Carcinog. 63:1922–1937. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang X, Niu R and Yang H, Lin Y, Hou H and Yang H: Fibroblast activation protein promotes progression of hepatocellular carcinoma via regulating the immunity. Cell Biol Int. 48:577–593. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Feig C, Jones JO, Kraman M, Wells RJ, Deonarine A, Chan DS, Connell CM, Roberts EW, Zhao Q, Caballero OL, et al: Targeting CXCL12 from FAP-expressing carcinoma-associated fibroblasts synergizes with anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 110:20212–20217. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cremasco V, Astarita JL, Grauel AL, Keerthivasan S, MacIsaac K, Woodruff MC, Wu M, Spel L, Santoro S, Amoozgar Z, et al: FAP delineates heterogeneous and functionally divergent stromal cells in immune-excluded breast tumors. Cancer Immunol Res. 6:1472–1485. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Costa A, Kieffer Y, Scholer-Dahirel A, Pelon F, Bourachot B, Cardon M, Sirven P, Magagna I, Fuhrmann L, Bernard C, et al: Fibroblast heterogeneity and immunosuppressive environment in human breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 33:463–479.e10. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cai J, Yang D, Sun H, Xiao L, Han F, Zhang M, Zhou L, Jiang M, Jiang Q, Li Y and Nie H: A multifactorial analysis of FAP to regulate gastrointestinal cancers progression. Front Immunol. 14:11834402023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wei R, Song J, Liu C, Zhao Z and Liu X, Yamamoto M, Tsukamoto T, Nomura S, Liu F, Wang Y and Liu X: FAP upregulates PD-L1 expression in cancer-associated fibroblasts to exacerbate T cells dysfunction and suppress anti-tumor immunity. Cancer Lett. 612:2174752025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang Q, Sun Y, Li J, Li Z, Yuan F, Xia Z, Meng F, Shen Z, Shen Y, Xu L, et al: Targeting LINC01711 in FAP+ cancer-associated fibroblasts overcomes lactate-mediated immunosuppression and enhances anti-PD-1 efficacy in lung adenocarcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 16:6422025. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ji D, Jia J, Cui X, Li Z and Wu A: FAP promotes metastasis and chemoresistance via regulating YAP1 and macrophages in mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma. IScience. 26:1066002023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Corvigno S, Fernebro J, Karlsson JS, Mezheieusky A, Martín-Bernabé A, De La Fuente LM, Westbom-Fremer S, Carlson JW, Klein C, Kannisto P, et al: High prevalence of FAP+ cancer-associated fibroblasts predicts poor outcome in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer with high CD8 T-cell density. Gynecol Oncol. 193:148–155. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Huang Q, Yan X, Zhang B, Liu Z, Chen Y, Liu X, Li M, Su X, Wang X, Wu B, et al: FAP as a prognostic biomarker and radiomics-based predictor of angiogenesis-associated recurrence in Adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma. Pituitary. 28:802025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Muilwijk T, Akand M, Daelemans S, Marien K, Waumans Y, Kockx M, Baekelandt L, Van den Broeck T, Van der Aa F, Gevaert T and Joniau S: Stromal marker fibroblast activation protein drives outcome in T1 non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. PLoS One. 16:e02571952021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Licaj M, Mhaidly R, Kieffer Y, Croizer H, Bonneau C, Meng A, Djerroudi L, Mujangi-Ebeka K, Hocine HR, Bourachot B, et al: Residual ANTXR1+ myofibroblasts after chemotherapy inhibit anti-tumor immunity via YAP1 signaling pathway. Nat Commun. 15:13122024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hintz HM, Gallant JP, Vander Griend DJ, Coleman IM, Nelson PS and LeBeau AM: Imaging fibroblast activation protein alpha improves diagnosis of metastatic prostate cancer with positron emission tomography. Clin Cancer Res. 26:4882–4891. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Millul J, Bassi G, Mock J, Elsayed A, Pellegrino C, Zana A, Dakhel Plaza S, Nadal L, Gloger A, Schmidt E, et al: An ultra-high-affinity small organic ligand of fibroblast activation protein for tumor-targeting applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 118:e21018521182021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lindner T, Altmann A, Krämer S, Kleist C, Loktev A, Kratochwil C, Giesel F, Mier W, Marme F, Debus J and Haberkorn U: Design and development of 99mTc-labeled FAPI tracers for SPECT imaging and 188Re therapy. J Nucl Med. 61:1507–1513. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Dendl K, Finck R, Giesel FL, Kratochwil C, Lindner T, Mier W, Cardinale J, Kesch C, Röhrich M, Rathke H, et al: FAP imaging in rare cancer entities-first clinical experience in a broad spectrum of malignancies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 49:721–731. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
|
Mona CE, Benz MR, Hikmat F, Grogan TR, Lueckerath K, Razmaria A, Riahi R, Slavik R, Girgis MD, Carlucci G, et al: Correlation of 68Ga-FAPi-46 PET biodistribution with FAP expression by immunohistochemistry in patients with solid cancers: Interim analysis of a prospective translational exploratory study. J Nucl Med. 63:1021–1026. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ding F, Huang C, Liang C, Wang C, Liu J and Tang D: 68Ga-FAPI-04 vs. 18F-FDG in a longitudinal preclinical PET imaging of metastatic breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 49:290–300. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Baum RP, Schuchardt C, Singh A, Chantadisai M, Robiller FC, Zhang J, Mueller D, Eismant A, Almaguel F, Zboralski D, et al: Feasibility, biodistribution, and preliminary dosimetry in peptide-targeted radionuclide therapy of diverse adenocarcinomas using 177Lu-FAP-2286: First-in-humans results. J Nucl Med. 63:415–423. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
|
Fu H, Huang J, Zhao T, Wang H, Chen Y, Xu W, Pang Y, Guo W, Sun L, Wu H, et al: Fibroblast activation protein-targeted radioligand therapy with 177Lu-EB-FAPI for metastatic radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer: First-in-human, dose-escalation study. Clin Cancer Res. 29:4740–4750. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Watabe T, Liu Y, Kaneda-Nakashima K, Shirakami Y, Lindner T, Ooe K, Toyoshima A, Nagata K, Shimosegawa E, Haberkorn U, et al: Theranostics targeting fibroblast activation protein in the tumor stroma: 64Cu- and 225Ac-labeled FAPI-04 in pancreatic cancer xenograft mouse models. J Nucl Med. 61:563–569. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
|
Akai M, Noma K, Kato T, Nishimura S, Matsumoto H, Kawasaki K, Kunitomo T, Kobayashi T, Nishiwaki N, Kashima H, et al: Fibroblast activation protein-targeted near-infrared photoimmunotherapy depletes immunosuppressive cancer-associated fibroblasts and remodels local tumor immunity. Br J Cancer. 130:1647–1658. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang P, Xu M, Ding J, Chen J, Zhang T, Huo L and Liu Z: Fatty acid-conjugated radiopharmaceuticals for fibroblast activation protein-targeted radiotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 49:1985–1996. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Wang LCS, Lo A, Scholler J, Sun J, Majumdar RS, Kapoor V, Antzis M, Cotner CE, Johnson LA, Durham AC, et al: Targeting fibroblast activation protein in tumor stroma with chimeric antigen receptor T cells can inhibit tumor growth and augment host immunity without severe toxicity. Cancer Immunol Res. 2:154–166. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lee IK, Noguera-Ortega E, Xiao Z, Todd L, Scholler J, Song D, Liousia M, Lohith K, Xu K, Edwards KJ, et al: Monitoring therapeutic response to anti-FAP CAR T cells using [18F] AlF-FAPI-74. Clin Cancer Res. 28:5330–5342. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lo A, Wang LCS, Scholler J, Monslow J, Avery D, Newick K, O'Brien S, Evans RA, Bajor DJ, Clendenin C, et al: Tumor-promoting desmoplasia is disrupted by depleting FAP-expressing stromal cells. Cancer Res. 75:2800–2810. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Xiao Z, Todd L, Huang L, Noguera-Ortega E, Lu Z, Huang L, Kopp M, Li Y, Pattada N, Zhong W, et al: Desmoplastic stroma restricts T cell extravasation and mediates immune exclusion and immunosuppression in solid tumors. Nat Commun. 14:51102023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Bai X, Zhang N, Liu H, Xie Y, Gao B, Xu T, Liu Z, Wang P, Zheng W, Yang X, et al: A preliminary study on the safety and efficacy of 177Lu-FAP-2286 in gastrointestinal tumours with positive FAP expression. Radiother Oncol. 213:1111952025. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Chen J, Zhou Y, Pang Y, Fu K, Luo Q, Sun L, Wu H, Lin Q, Su G, Chen X, et al: FAP-targeted radioligand therapy with 68Ga/177Lu-DOTA-2P(FAPI)2 enhance immunogenicity and synergize with PD-L1 inhibitors for improved antitumor efficacy. J Immunother Cancer. 13:e0102122025. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Bao G, Wang Z, Liu L, Zhang B, Song S, Wang D, Cheng S, Moon ES, Roesch F, Zhao J, et al: Targeting CXCR4/CXCL12 axis via [177Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.(SA.FAPi)2 with CXCR4 antagonist in triple-negative breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 51:2744–2757. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhao L, Pang Y, Zhou Y, Chen J, Fu H, Guo W, Xu W, Xue X, Su G, Sun L, et al: Antitumor efficacy and potential mechanism of FAP-targeted radioligand therapy combined with immune checkpoint blockade. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 9:1422024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Taddio MF, Doshi S, Masri M, Jeanjean P, Hikmat F, Gerlach A, Nyiranshuti L, Rosser EW, Schaue D, Besserer-Offroy E, et al: Evaluating [225Ac]Ac-FAPI-46 for the treatment of soft-tissue sarcoma in mice. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 51:4026–4037. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Garate-Soraluze E, Serrano-Mendioroz I, Fernández-Rubio L, De Andrea CE, Barrio-Alonso C, Herrero CDP, Teijeira A, Luri-Rey C, Claus C, Tanos T, et al: 4-1BB agonist targeted to fibroblast activation protein α synergizes with radiotherapy to treat murine breast tumor models. J Immunother Cancer. 13:e0098522025. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Fabre M, Ferrer C, Domínguez-Hormaetxe S, Bockorny B, Murias L, Seifert O, Eisler SA, Kontermann RE, Pfizenmaier K, Lee SY, et al: OMTX705, a novel FAP-targeting ADC demonstrates activity in chemotherapy and pembrolizumab-resistant solid tumor models. Clin Cancer Res. 26:3420–3430. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wehrli M, Guinn S, Birocchi F, Kuo A, Sun Y, Larson RC, Almazan AJ, Scarfò I, Bouffard AA, Bailey SR, et al: Mesothelin CAR T cells secreting anti-FAP/anti-CD3 molecules efficiently target pancreatic adenocarcinoma and its stroma. Clin Cancer Res. 30:1859–1877. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Das S, Valton J, Duchateau P and Poirot L: Stromal depletion by TALEN-edited universal hypoimmunogenic FAP-CAR T cells enables infiltration and anti-tumor cytotoxicity of tumor antigen-targeted CAR-T immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 14:11726812023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhou S, Zhen Z, Paschall AV, Xue L, Yang X, Bebin-Blackwell AG, Cao Z, Zhang W, Wang M, Teng Y, et al: FAP-targeted photodynamic therapy mediated by ferritin nanoparticles elicits an immune response against cancer cells and cancer associated fibroblasts. Adv Funct Mater. 31:20070172021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Galbiati A, Dorten P, Gilardoni E, Gierse F, Bocci M, Zana A, Mock J, Claesener M, Cufe J, Büther F, et al: Tumor-targeted interleukin 2 boosts the anticancer activity of FAP-directed radioligand therapeutics. J Nucl Med. 64:1934–1940. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang H, Wu Q, Liu Z, Luo X, Fan Y, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Hua S, Fu Q, Zhao M, et al: Downregulation of FAP suppresses cell proliferation and metastasis through PTEN/PI3K/AKT and Ras-ERK signaling in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 5:e11552014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wei L, Ye H, Li G, Lu Y, Zhou Q, Zheng S, Lin Q, Liu Y, Li Z and Chen R: Cancer-associated fibroblasts promote progression and gemcitabine resistance via the SDF-1/SATB-1 pathway in pancreatic cancer. Cell Death Dis. 9:10652018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kieffer Y, Hocine HR, Gentric G, Pelon F, Bernard C, Bourachot B, Lameiras S, Albergante L, Bonneau C, Guyard A, et al: Single-cell analysis reveals fibroblast clusters linked to immunotherapy resistance in cancer. Cancer Discov. 10:1330–1351. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cumming J, Maneshi P, Dongre M, Alsaed T, Dehghan-Nayeri MJ, Ling A, Pietras K, Patthey C and Öhlund D: Dissecting FAP+ cell diversity in pancreatic cancer uncovers an interferon-response subtype of cancer-associated fibroblasts with tumor-restraining properties. Cancer Res. 85:2388–2411. 2025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhao Z and Zhu Y: FAP, CD10, and GPR77-labeled CAFs cause neoadjuvant chemotherapy resistance by inducing EMT and CSC in gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 23:5072023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sun X, He X, Zhang Y, Hosaka K, Andersson P, Wu J, Wu J, Jing X, Du Q, Hui X, et al: Inflammatory cell-derived CXCL3 promotes pancreatic cancer metastasis through a novel myofibroblast-hijacked cancer escape mechanism. Gut. 71:129–147. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Chen Z, Feng X, Pathak JL, Fu Z, Chen X, Zeng L, Zheng Y, Qiu Q, Qiao L and Wu L: FAP+ fibroblasts promote C1QC+ macrophage infiltration via WNT2 signaling to exacerbate T cell exhaustion in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 646:2184102026. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Chen X, Chen W, Zhao Y, Wang Q, Wang W, Xiang Y, Yuan H, Xie Y and Zhou J: Interplay of Helicobacter pylori, fibroblasts, and cancer cells induces fibroblast activation and serpin E1 expression by cancer cells to promote gastric tumorigenesis. J Transl Med. 20:3222022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Elyada E, Bolisetty M, Laise P, Flynn WF, Courtois ET, Burkhart RA, Teinor JA, Belleau P, Biffi G, Lucito MS, et al: Cross-species single-cell analysis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma reveals antigen-presenting cancer-associated fibroblasts. Cancer Discov. 9:1102–1123. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ding X, Wu Q, Du Y, Ji MM, Yang H, Hu Q and Ye Y: CDK16+ luminal progenitor cell-like tumor cells interacted with POSTN+ cancer-associated fibroblasts associate with chemo-resistance in breast cancer. Small Methods. 9:e24011922025. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ni C, Lou X, Yao X, Wang L, Wan J, Duan X, Liang J, Zhang K, Yang Y, Zhang L, et al: ZIP1+ fibroblasts protect lung cancer against chemotherapy via connexin-43 mediated intercellular Zn2+ transfer. Nat Commun. 13:59192022. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Wei WF, Chen XJ, Liang LJ, Yu L, Wu XG, Zhou CF, Wang ZC, Fan LS, Hu Z, Liang L and Wang W: Periostin+ cancer-associated fibroblasts promote lymph node metastasis by impairing the lymphatic endothelial barriers in cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Oncol. 15:210–227. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
|
Huang M, Fu M, Wang J, Xia C, Zhang H, Xiong Y, He J, Liu J, Liu B, Pan S and Liu F: TGF-β1-activated cancer-associated fibroblasts promote breast cancer invasion, metastasis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition by autophagy or overexpression of FAP-α. Biochem Pharmacol. 188:1145272021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Kumar V, Ramnarayanan K, Sundar R, Padmanabhan N, Srivastava S, Koiwa M, Yasuda T, Koh V, Huang KK, Tay ST, et al: Single-cell atlas of lineage states, tumor microenvironment, and subtype-specific expression programs in gastric cancer. Cancer Discov. 12:670–691. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Rubinstein-Achiasaf L, Morein D, Ben-Yaakov H, Liubomirski Y, Meshel T, Elbaz E, Dorot O, Pichinuk E, Gershovits M, Weil M and Ben-Baruch A: Persistent inflammatory stimulation drives the conversion of MSCs to inflammatory CAFs that promote pro-metastatic characteristics in breast cancer cells. Cancers (Basel). 13:14722021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Brokopp CE, Schoenauer R, Richards P, Bauer S, Lohmann C, Emmert MY, Weber B, Winnik S, Aikawa E, Graves K, et al: Fibroblast activation protein is induced by inflammation and degrades type I collagen in thin-cap fibroatheromata. Eur Heart J. 32:2713–2722. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zeng W, Xiong L, Wu W, Li S, Liu J, Yang L, Lao L, Huang P, Zhang M, Chen H, et al: CCL18 signaling from tumor-associated macrophages activates fibroblasts to adopt a chemoresistance-inducing phenotype. Oncogene. 42:224–237. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
|
Sun D, Li W, Ding D, Tan K, Ding W, Wang Z, Fu S, Hou G, Zhou WP and Gu F: IL-17a promotes hepatocellular carcinoma by increasing FAP expression in hepatic stellate cells via activation of the STAT3 signaling pathway. Cell Death Discov. 10:2302024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kobayashi H, Gieniec KA, Lannagan TRM, Wang T, Asai N, Mizutani Y, Iida T, Ando R, Thomas EM, Sakai A, et al: The origin and contribution of cancer-associated fibroblasts in colorectal carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology. 162:890–906. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Cohen SJ, Alpaugh RK, Palazzo I, Meropol NJ, Rogatko A, Xu Z, Hoffman JP, Weiner LM and Cheng JD: Fibroblast activation protein and its relationship to clinical outcome in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Pancreas. 37:154–158. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kashima H, Noma K, Ohara T, Kato T, Katsura Y, Komoto S, Sato H, Katsube R, Ninomiya T, Tazawa H, et al: Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) promote the lymph node metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 144:828–840. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zhang Y, Tang H, Cai J, Zhang T, Guo J, Feng D and Wang Z: Ovarian cancer-associated fibroblasts contribute to epithelial ovarian carcinoma metastasis by promoting angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis and tumor cell invasion. Cancer Lett. 303:47–55. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Moreno-Ruiz P, Corvigno S, Te Grootenhuis NC, La Fleur L, Backman M, Strell C, Mezheyeuski A, Hoelzlwimmer G, Klein C, Botling J, et al: Stromal FAP is an independent poor prognosis marker in non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma and associated with p53 mutation. Lung Cancer Amst Neth. 155:10–19. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Pellinen T, Paavolainen L, Martín-Bernabé A, Papatella Araujo R, Strell C, Mezheyeuski A, Backman M, La Fleur L, Brück O, Sjölund J, et al: Fibroblast subsets in non-small cell lung cancer: Associations with survival, mutations, and immune features. J Natl Cancer Inst. 115:71–82. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar |