International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.
International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.
Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.
Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.
Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.
Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.
International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.
Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.
Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.
Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.
An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.
Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world with a high incidence (5.6% of all cancers) (1,2). Genetic susceptibility is one of the important risk factors for GC (3-5). Germline mutations in the E-cadherin gene (CDH1) or microsatellite instability in the DNA mismatch repair gene hMLH1 are associated with familial GC (6,7). In addition to genetic factors, the risk factors for GC are also associated with Helicobacter pylori infection and unhealthy lifestyles, including alcohol consumption, high-salt diet and smoking (2,8). Due to the lack of clear clinical indications, most patients were in the advanced stage of GC at diagnosis, accompanied by poor prognosis (1,9). The innovation of molecular analysis technology has improved the efficiency and accuracy of prediction of diagnostic and targeted therapy markers (10). The diversification of treatment methods such as chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy and the innovation of molecular diagnostic technology have prolonged the survival of patients, but the 5-year survival of patients with GC is still less than 30% (9,11). Therefore, it is essential to find effective early markers for the diagnosis and treatment of GC.
T-box transcription factor 15 (TBX15) belongs to the T-box gene family, encoding a phylogenetically conserved transcription factor family. Members of this family have a highly conserved characteristic sequence of 180 amino acid residues that can bind to DNA, and their target genes contain one or more T half-sites in the upstream promoter sequence (12,13). TBX15 has been found to play a role in the regulation of various diseases, such as heart failure (14), osteoporosis (15), obesity (16) and cancer development (17,18). In multiple tumor studies, TBX15 was associated with poor prognosis in patients with glioma (18,19) and colorectal cancer (20). In addition, TBX15 enriched in glioma was associated with immunosuppressive genes (19). It can be hypothesized that TBX15 may participate in the immune escape process of cancer cells. In a GC study, TBX15 was implicated in GC cell proliferation and drug antitumor pathways (21). However, the regulatory pathways of TBX15 related to the prognosis of patients with GC and their immune escape remain an unsolved problem.
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is a kind of RNA modification, which widely exists in eukaryotic mRNA modification. The m6A WERs ('writers', 'erasers' and 'readers') control the dynamic modification process of m6A, which is mainly regulated by proteins methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3), methyltransferase 14 (METTL14), YTH-domain-containing proteins (YTHDFs), insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding proteins (IGF2BPs) and demethylases (FTO and ALKBH5) (22). m6A methylation affects the physiological process of cells by regulating the fate of downstream mRNAs. These include maintenance of RNA stability (23-25), mRNA nuclear export (26,27) and microRNA processing (28). The effect on RNA stability is mainly achieved by m6A 'reader' proteins that are connected to downstream molecular pathways. In the cytoplasm, the YTHDF protein family is able to preferentially recognize m6A-containing RNAs and subsequently direct them to degradation pathways (29). A key member of the m6A methyltransferase complex is METTL3, which acts as a reversible epitranscriptomic regulator. During m6A modification, METTL3 acts as an enzyme responsible for catalyzing m6A deposition and forms a complex with several other proteins that act together to promote m6A deposition on RNA (30,31). m6A modification plays a role in the development of various types of cancer (32,33). In multiple cancer studies, METTL3 has been linked to the malignant advancement of tumors and poor prognosis of patients, including colorectal cancer (34), cervical cancer (35), hepatocellular carcinoma (36) and GC (37). Its regulatory mechanisms include glycolysis, self-renewal, tumorigenicity and metastasis of tumor cells. However, the specific molecular mechanisms through which METTL3 is involved in immune escape in GC cells remain unclear.
The present study aims to investigate the role of TBX15 in mediating immune escape of GC cells, analyze and determine the regulatory relationship between TBX15 mRNA and m6A methylation modification, so as to enhance the understanding of TBX15 in GC cell immune escape and provide new ideas for future GC-targeted therapy.
The human gastric mucosal epithelial cell (GES-1; cat. no. AW-CNH199), human GC cell lines HGC27 (cat. no. AW-CNH127) and MKN74 (cat. no. AW-CCH277), mouse forestomach carcinoma (MFC; cat. no. AW-CCM404) and tohoku hospital pediatrics-1 (THP-1; AW-CCH098) were purchased from Abiowell (https://www.abiowell.com/). All plasmids were purchased from Honor Gene Co., Ltd. These included TBX15 silencing (si-TBX15; cat. no. HG-SH152380), TBX15 overexpression (oe-TBX15; cat. no. HG-HO152380), matrix metalloproteinase 14 (MMP14) overexpression (oe-MMP14; cat. no. HG-HO004995), METTL3 silencing (si-METTL3#1-3; cat. no. HG-SH019852), MMP14-wt (cat. no. HG-YO020961) and MMP14-mut (cat. no. HG-YO020961M). Male C57BL/6 mice (6 weeks) were ordered from Hunan SJA Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd. TRIzol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), mRNA reverse transcription kit (CWBIO), and UltraSYBR Mixture (CWBIO) were used for reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis. 5-Ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) kit (cat. no. C10310) was purchased from Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd. Annexin V-APC assay kit (Nanjing KeyGen Biotech Co., Ltd.) and TUNEL assay kit (cat. no. 40306ES50; Yeasen Biotechnology) (https://www.yeasen.com/) were used to detecT cell death. The inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS; cat. no. CSB-E08326m), IL-1β (cat. no. CSB-E08054m), TNF-α (cat. no. CSB-E04741m), Arg-1 (cat. no. CSB-EL002005MO), IL-10 (cat. no. CSB-E04594m) and CD206 (cat. no. CSB-EL014782MO) kits were purchased from Wuhan Huamei Biotech Co., Ltd. The m6A assay kit (cat. no. P-9005; EpiGentek) was used to analyze m6A detection. MeRIP-qPCR kit (cat. no. 17-700) and Actinomycin D (cat. no. A4262) were purchased from MilliporeSigma. A dual luciferase assay kit (cat. no. E1910) was purchased from Promega Corporation. All antibody information is shown in Table SI.
The RNA sequencing profiles and clinical data for 33 cancerous from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) cohorts (GTEx Analysis Release V8, https://gtexportal.org) were retrieved from the University of California Santa Cruz Xena database (https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/). Univariate Cox regression (uniCox) and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed. The R packages 'survminer' and 'survival' visualized the results, including overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free interval (DFI) and progression-free interval (PFI) of patients with GC. JASPAR online software (https://jaspar.elixir.no/) was used to predict potential downstream targets of transcription factors. SRAMP online software (http://www.cuilab.cn/sramp) predicted m6A modification sites on RNA. RM2Target (http://rm2target.canceromics.org/#/home) predicted m6A-associated enzymes that bind to target genes.
GC tissue samples (n=10) and corresponding paracancerous tissue samples were collected. All samples were obtained from patients with GC in Zhuzhou Hospital Affiliated to Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University between May 2024 and May 2025. The procedures followed in the present study were approved (approval no. ZZCHEC2022070-01) by the Ethics Committee (Zhuzhou, China) and performed followed Declaration of Helsinki Guideline. Written informed consent was obtained from each enrolled subject. The baseline information statistics of patients are shown in Table SII.
Cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum (both from Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. The cell incubator environment was maintained at 37°C with a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.
To explore the effects of TBX15, MMP14 and METTL3 on GC cells, plasmid intervention experiments of si-TBX15, oe-TBX15, oe-MMP14 and si-METTL3#1-3 were performed. The corresponding plasmids and negative control (si-NC and oe-NC) were transfected into cells. si-TBX15#1-3 sequences are as follows: si-TBX15#1, 5′-GAC AAT AAA AGA TAC AGA TAT-3′; si-TBX15#2, 5′-GGG GTG AAA ACG TTC AAC TTT-3′; si-TBX15#3, 5′-GAC ATA TAC CCA AGA ACA AGA-3′. si-METTL3#1-3 sequences are as follows: si-METTL3#1, 5′-GAG TTG ATT GAG GTA AAG CGA-3′; si-METTL3#2, 5′-TAG AGC TAT TAA ATA CTA CAA-3′; si-METTL3#3, 5′-GAC GAA TTA TCA ATA AAC ACA-3′. si-NC sequence is 5′-TGC GGG GCT AGG GTC CAA CGG-3′.
A co-culture system of GC cell-TAM cells was constructed. The THP-1 was resuspended in RPMI-1640 medium and seeded in 6-well culture plates at a density of 7.5×105 cells/well. THP-1 cells were treated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA; 320 nmol/l) for 6 h and then co-cultured with tumor cells for 24 h. After washing the cells with PBS, they were resuspended in serum-free RPMI-1640 medium. Macrophages were harvested, and flow analysis was performed.
A co-culture system of MFC cell-CD8+ T cells was established. Spleen-derived CD8+ T cells were isolated using MojoSort™ Mouse CD8+ T cell Isolation kit (BioLegend, Inc.). Isolated CD8+ T cells were activated with Ultra-LEAF™ purified anti-mouse CD3/CD28 (BioLegend, Inc.) for 3 days following the manufacturer's protocol. IL-2 (10 ng/ml) was added to RPMI-1640 medium for experiments. Transfected MFC cells were co-incubated with activated CD8+ T cells for 48 h. The ratio of tumor cells to CD8+ T cells was 1:1-1:20. CD8+ T cells were collected and analyzed for granzyme B (GZMB), perforin (PFP), CD100, IFN-γ and TNF-α expression.
A total of 48 C57BL/6 mice (male, 6 weeks old, ~20 g) were maintained under pathogen-free conditions for 1 week. Mice were raised on a 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle (22~25°C) with ad libitum access to water and food. All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with animal care, animal welfare and ethics. It has been approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University (approval no. 2022722).
Experiment 1: Mice were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=6): Control group, sh-NC group and sh-TBX15 group. Mice in the sh-NC and sh-TBX15 groups were injected with 1×106 MFC cells (100 µl, resuspended in PBS) that had been transfected with sh-NC and sh-TBX15 plasmids. At room temperature, 3 µg of sh-NC and sh-TBX15 plasmids were transfected into MFC cells by using Lipofectamine™ 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). At 48 h after transfection, cells were collected immediately for injection. The injection site was the right underarm. MFC cells injected in the Control group were not treated. The body weight and tumor were observed twice a week, and the tumor volume was measured with vernier calipers. The tumor volume was calculated by the formula V=(L × W2)/2, where V was the volume (mm3), L was the maximum diameter (mm), and W was the minimum diameter (mm). The experiment was finished 21 days after tumor seeding, and animals were euthanized by intraperitoneal injection of 200 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital solution. Samples were received and images were captured after euthanasia. sh-TBX15 sequence is 5′-GAC AAT AAA AGA TAC AGA TAT-3′ and sh-NC sequence is 5′-TGC GGG GCT AGG GTC CAA CGG-3′.
Experiment 2: Mice were randomly divided into 5 groups (n=6): Control group, sh-NC group, sh-METTL3 group, sh-METTL3 + oe-NC group, sh-METTL3 + oe-TBX15 group. Consistent with the aforementioned intervention procedure, MFC cells subjected to sh-METTL3 and oe-TBX15 interventions were injected into the right armpit of mice. After 21 days, mice were euthanized by intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital solution (200 mg/kg) and tumors were collected. sh-METTL3 sequence is 5′-GAC GAA TTA TCA ATA AAC ACA-3′. sh-NC sequence is 5′-TGC GGG GCT AGG GTC CAA CGG-3′.
To detect gene expression in tissues and cells, qPCR analysis was performed (38). Total RNA was extracted from GC tissues, mouse tumor bodies, and cells using TRIzol reagent, and the concentration was determined by ultraviolet spectrophotometer. cDNA was synthesized using an mRNA reverse transcription kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. qPCR was applied to detect the mRNA levels using UltraSYBR Mixture. PCR reaction conditions were 95°C for 10 min, and 95°C for 15 sec, and 60°C for 30 sec, for 40 cycles. Melting curve analysis was performed with a temperature gradient of 60-95°C. The primers were designed by primer5 (https://premierbiosoft.com/) and synthesized by the TsingKe Biological Technology. The relative mRNA levels of the target genes were determined by the 2−ΔΔCq method (39) and normalized to β-actin (as an endogenous control). All primer sequences are included in Table SIII.
To determine the protein levels of TBX15, MMP14, Granzyme B, Perforin, CD100, IFN-γ, TNF-α and METTL3, western blotting was performed. Referring to a previous study (40), total protein was extracted from GC tissues and cells using the RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). A BCA assay kit was performed to detect protein concentrations. Equal amounts of protein (15-20 µg) were separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. After 5% skim milk was used for incubation and blocking for 90 min at room temperature, freshly prepared specific primary antibodies were used to incubate the membranes at 4°C overnight. After incubation with the secondary antibody (90 min, room temperature) was completed, ECL chemiluminescence solution was added to the membrane, followed by imaging using a gel imaging system (ChemiScope6100, Clinx). β-actin was applied to normalize the target protein levels. Relative expression level of the target protein=gray value of target protein/gray value of internal reference (β-actin).
After the mouse tumor and GC tissues were fixed in paraffin for 24 h at room temperature, the samples were sectioned (2 µm) (25). After deparaffinization with xylene, it was then rehydrated with graded ethanol series. The sections were immersed in 0.01 M sodium citrate antigen repair solution (pH 6.0) and heated in a microwave oven for thermal antigen repair. Incubation with 1% periodate for 15 min was used to inactivate endogenous enzymes. After incubation with specific primary antibodies (4°C overnight) anti-TBX15, anti-Ki67, anti-PD-L1, anti-CD100, anti-IFN-γ and anti-TNF-α, sections were subjected to secondary antibody incubation for 30 min at 37°C. After DAB color development, hematoxylin counterstain was performed, after which section images were randomly acquired. Data are presented as the mean IOD and positive rate. Positive rate was calculated as follows: (Number of positive cells/the number of total cells) ×100%.
To detect the proliferative activity of GC cells, Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay (Dojindo Laboratories, Inc.) and 5-Ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) analysis were performed. For CCK-8 assay, 10 µl CCK-8 reagent was added to prepared cells (5×103 cells) and incubated for 4 h at 37°C, followed by detection of absorbance values (OD values) in each well at 480 nm.
The EdU cell proliferation kit was performed. Cells were seeded into a culture medium containing EdU reagent and incubated overnight. Cells were fixed by incubation with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature. After incubation with 100 µl of 1X Apollo® reaction solution for staining, 1X Hoechst33342 reaction solution was added for staining (30 min at room temperature). Images were captured using a fluorescence microscope. Cell proliferation rate was calculated as follows: (Number of Edu-positive cells/total number of cells) ×100%.
To analyze the level of apoptosis, an Annexin V-APC assay kit was performed (25). Prepared cells were harvested. The Annexin V-APC and Propidium Iodide reagents were added. Reaction was performed at room temperature and in the dark for 10 min before analysis using flow cytometry (CytoFLEX; Beckman Coulter, Inc.). Data were analyzed with the use of CytExpert software (version 2.5; Beckman Coulter, Inc.). Apoptotic rate (%) was calculated as follows: Early apoptotic rate (%) + late apoptotic rate (%).
To analyze the polarization of M1 and M2 macrophages, CD86 and CD206 positive cells were identified using flow cytometry. After digestion and washing of the cells, anti-CD86 or anti-CD206 antibodies were added. FCM was used for analysis after 30 min of staining in the dark. Percentage of positive cells (%) was calculated as follows: (Cells expressing a marker/targeT cell population) ×100%.
GC cells were seeded in 6-well culture plates until a monolayer was formed. A micropipette tip (200 µl) was used to generate the wound. Sterile PBS was used to wash and remove suspended cells. Image of the scratch was captured at 0 h. After incubation in serum-free Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) medium for 24 and 48 h, images were captured again for recording. A total of 3 visual fields were taken at each time point.
Cell invasion ability was determined by performing Transwell assays (41) with 8-µm-pore membranes. Stably transfected GC cells (2×106 cells/well) were seeded into the upper chamber, and 10% fetal bovine serum culture medium was added to the lower chamber. After culturing at 37°C for 48 h, cells on the upper surface of the filter were removed by wiping with a cotton ball. Next, the filter was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min and stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 5 min at room temperature. A total of three randomly selected fields were counted under a light microscope.
To detect apoptosis in the tumor tissue, TUNEL staining was performed using a TUNEL assay kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. DAPI working solution (5 µg/ml) was used to stain the nuclei. A fluorescence microscope was used to view the images. A total of 6 fields of view were randomly selected for assessment. Data are presented in the form of positive rates. Positive rate was calculated as follows: (Number of positive cells/the number of total cells) ×100%.
After total protein extraction from mouse tumor bodies, the levels of iNOS, IL-1β, TNF-α, Arg-1, IL-10 and CD206 were measured by commercial kits according to the manufacturer's instructions. An absorbance (OD) value at 450 nm was used to quantify protein levels. Final sample concentration equals measured concentration/protein concentration.
A dual luciferase assay kit was used to detect targeting between TBX15 and MMP14 according to manufacturer's instructions. The MMP14-wt, MMP14-mut and TBX15 overexpression plasmid were transiently transfected into cells using Lipofectamine™ 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). A reference reporter plasmid containing Renilla luciferase (pRL-TK) was co-transfected into the cells to regulate the transfection efficiency. After 48 h, cells were harvested and lysed for 15 min. Cell lysates were obtained for analysis of luciferase activity. The MMP14-mut sequence is: 5′-ACC ACA CT-3′.
ChIP-qPCR was performed to analyze the targeting relationship between TBX15 and MMP14 promoters. Immunoprecipitation was performed using anti-TBX15 and IgG. qPCR was performed to quantify the immunoprecipitated DNA. The primers used for ChIP-qPCR are shown in Table SI.
The m6A assay kit was performed to detect the global m6A levels. The cells and tissues were harvested and total RNA was extracted. The working solution of anti-m6A was used to incubate the samples for 30 min. The reaction was performed with the developer solution at room temperature in the dark for 10 min. After the terminator stop solution for 10 min, the m6A level was quantified by observing the absorbance value (OD values) at 450 nm. m6A (ng)=[Sample OD -NC OD)/Slope, m6A %=(m6A Amount (ng)]/S ×100%. Slope is the slope of the standard curve, and S is the amount of input sample RNA in ng (200 ng).
A MeRIP-qPCR kit was applied to detect the m6A levels of the target genes (25). Total RNA was extracted from GC cells. Samples were coupled to protein A/G magnetic beads (40 µl) overnight in IP buffer containing anti-m6A and anti-IgG. m6A-modified TBX15 was enriched. qPCR was performed to detect TBX15 levels with m6A modification.
METTL3 and TBX15 mRNA binding was identified. The prepared cells were harvested and total protein was extracted. The TBX15 mRNA probe, which was used as a bait factor, was bound to streptavidin magnetic beads. Total protein was mixed with magnetic beads after probe binding and incubated for 60 min. After elution, proteins were collected and assayed for METTL3 protein expression.
GC cells were cultured in a culture medium containing Actinomycin D (5 µg/ml) for specific periods of time (42). Cells were collected for total RNA extraction. The stability of TBX15 mRNA was analyzed by measuring the mRNA level of TBX15 by qPCR.
All experimental data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). GraphPad Prism (version 9.0.0; Dotmatics) was employed to perform data analysis. The Shapiro-Wilk test was employed to analyze the normality of the data. The two-tailed t-test (data comparison between two groups), one-way ANOVA, and two-way ANOVA (data comparison between multiple groups) were applied. Post hoc tests for multiple group comparisons were performed using Tukey's multiple comparisons test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant for comparison between groups.
Based on TCGA and GTEx pan-cancer data, TBX15 expression was analyzed. TBX15 was enriched in cancer tissues in 21 tumors, including GC (TCGA-STAD) (Fig. S1A). In TCGA-STAD, TBX15 was significantly highly expressed in both unpaired and paired GC samples (Fig. 1A). Pan-cancer prognostic data for TBX15 is presented in Fig. S1B. TBX15 was a high-risk factor for GC (TCGA-STAD) in OS, DSS and PFI analyses (OS, P=0.048; DSS, P=0.007; PFI, P=0.003). Patients with GC with high TBX15 predicted shorter survival time (OS, P=0.013; DSS, P=0.00088; DFI, P=0.034; PFI, P<0.0001; Fig. 1B). Next, the TBX15 levels were analyzed in the collected GC tissues [TBX15 mRNA: 3.62±0.95; TBX15 (1G): 3.92±0.20; TBX15 (1H): 34.58±2.22] and their paracancerous tissues [TBX15 mRNA: 1.18±0.23; TBX15 (1D): 1.00±0.13; TBX15 (1E): 9.80±1.80] (Fig. 1C-E). TBX15 was highly expressed in GC. The aforementioned results proved that TBX15, which is associated with poor prognosis in patients with GC, was enriched in GC.
To further explore the involvement of TBX15 in GC cells, the expression of TBX15 was identified in GC cells (HGC27 and MKN74). GES-1 (TBX15 mRNA: 1.00±0.05; TBX15: 0.09±0.01) was used as control. TBX15 was highly expressed in HGC27 (TBX15 mRNA: 3.30±0.67; TBX15: 0.39±0.03) and MKN74 (TBX15 mRNA: 3.17±0.58; TBX15: 0.43±0.03) cells (Fig. 2A). The TBX15-silenced cells were successfully constructed in HGC27 and MKN74 (Figs. 2B and S2A). Proliferation ability decreased after silencing TBX15 (Fig. 2C and D; Fig. S2B and C). TBX15 silencing promoted GC cell apoptosis (Figs. 2E and S2D). The effect of TBX15 silencing intervention on GC cell migration was analyzed. At 24 and 48 h, the cell migration distance in the si-TBX15 group (HGC27: 934.1±253.1; MKN74: 934.1±177.2) was lower than the si-NC group (HGC27: 788.8±386.5; MKN74: 836.4±251.8) (Figs. 2F and S2E). Transwell was performed to analyze the invasion ability of GC cells. TBX15 silencing inhibited cell invasion (Figs. 2G and S2F). These data proved that knockdown of TBX15, which is highly expressed in HGC27 and MKN74, inhibited the proliferation, migration and invasion of GC cells.
Next, the effect of TBX15 on GC development was analyzed by tumor burden. MFC cells with or without sh-TBX15 intervention were subcutaneously injected into mice to induce tumor formation. The tumor volume (maximum diameter: 14.78 mm, maximum volume: 1181.46 mm3) and weight decreased after TBX15 silencing (Fig. 3A-C). TBX15 silencing reduced tumor burden in mice. The apoptotic rate increased, and Ki67 levels decreased (Fig. 3D-F). These evidence demonstrated that TBX15 silencing could inhibit GC development in vivo.
MMP14 is a membrane-anchored matrix metalloproteinase. Based on the patient data in TCGA-STAD, the expression of TBX15 and MMP14 was predicted to be positively correlated (Fig. 4A). MMP14 mRNA and protein levels increased in GC tissues, and TBX15 was positively correlated with MMP14 (Fig. 4B and C). JASPAR online prediction found that the transcription factor TBX15 might target the MMP14 promoter (Fig. 4D). A dual luciferase reporter gene was used to verify the activity of the MMP14 promoter. Overexpression of TBX15 increased MMP14 promoter activity (Fig. 4E). ChIP-PCR assay showed that TBX15 interacted with the MMP14 promoter (Fig. 4F). Overexpression of TBX15 was found to promote MMP14 mRNA and protein expression (Fig. 4G and H). These results suggested that the transcription factor TBX15 may target the MMP14 promoter to regulate its transcriptional activity.
The relationship between TBX15 and immune cells was further explored. In the GC microenvironment, macrophages were enriched, while CD8+ T cell infiltration level was significantly reduced (43). Macrophages play a crucial role in the innate immune system. Under different microenvironmental stimuli, macrophages can transform into two different subtypes (M1 and M2), which have completely different molecular phenotypes and functional characteristics. TAMs are macrophages that differentiate under the influence of various factors in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and have the characteristics and functions of M2-type macrophages. To analyze the role of TBX15 and MMP14 in GC immune escape, a co-culture system of GC cells and macrophages was constructed. After intervention with TBX15 silencing and MMP14 overexpression, GC cells were then co-cultured with macrophages (Fig. 5A; Fig. S3A and B). TBX15 silencing promoted the levels of M1-type TAM cells and decreased the M2-type levels (Fig. 5B and C; Fig. S3C and D). The gating strategy of Fig. S4A and B was used to gate the cell subsets. M1 macrophage markers (iNOS, IL-1β and TNF-α) were increased after TBX15 silencing, and the opposite was observed for M2 macrophage markers (Arg-1, IL-10 and CD206) (Fig. 5D and E; Fig. S3E and F). These results suggested that TBX15 silencing promotes TAMs toward an M1 proinflammatory phenotype. Overexpression of MMP14 decreased the levels of iNOS, IL-1β and TNF-α and increased Arg-1, IL-10 and CD206. This indicated that overexpression of MMP14 reduced the regulatory effect of TBX15 silencing on macrophage polarization.
In addition, CD8+ T cell-associated cytokines GZMB, PFP, CD100, IFN-γ and TNF-α were identified in the co-culture system constructed by MFC cells and CD8+ T cells. In the TBX15-silenced co-culture system, GZMB, PFP, CD100, IFN-γ and TNF-α levels increased. Silencing TBX15 enhanced CD8+ T cell activation and antitumor immunity. Overexpression of MMP14 reduced the levels of GZMB, PFP, CD100, IFN-γ, and TNF-α (Fig. 5F and G).
In summary, TBX15 participates in the immune escape process of GC by promoting macrophage M2 polarization and inhibiting CD8+ T cell activation.
The SRAMP online website predicted that TBX15 might undergo m6A modification, and RM2Target predicted that TBX15 would bind to the m6A methyltransferase METTL3 (Fig. S5A and B). In GC, METTL3 expression and total m6A levels were increased (Fig. 6A-C). METTL3 expression and total m6A level increased in HGC27 (METTL3 mRNA: 4.02±0.34; METTL3: 0.44±0.03; m6A%: 0.12±0.01) and MKN74 (METTL3 mRNA: 3.68±0.38; METTL3: 0.48±0.02; m6A%: 0.12±0.01) compared with GES-1 (METTL3 mRNA: 1.00±0.11; METTL3: 0.04±0; m6A%: 0.07±0.02) (Fig. 6D-F). To further explore the regulatory relationship between METTL3 and TBX15, METTL3 silenced cells were constructed (Figs. 6G and S5C). After silencing METTL3, the m6A level of TBX15 was decreased (Figs. 6H and S5D). Results proved that METTL3 binds to TBX15 mRNA (Figs. 6I and S5E). METTL3 silencing reduced TBX15 mRNA stability (Figs. 6J and S5F). These results indicated that silencing METTL3 inhibits the m6A level of TBX15 and reduces TBX15 mRNA stability.
To explore whether METTL3 regulates GC cell function and development through the TBX15/MMP14 signaling axis, METTL3 silencing and TBX15 overexpression cells were constructed. METTL3 silencing inhibited MMP14 expression, and TBX15 overexpression attenuated the inhibitory effect of METTL3 silencing on MMP14 expression (Figs. 7A and S6A). METTL3 silencing decreased proliferation activity and increased apoptotic rate of GC cells (Fig. 7B-D; Fig. S6B-D). Overexpression of TBX15 increased proliferation and decreased apoptosis. Overexpression of TBX15 reduced the inhibitory effect of METTL3 silencing on migration (Figs. 7E and S6E). Under the intervention conditions of METTL3 silencing and TBX15 overexpression, cell invasion was altered, consistent with migration (Figs. 7F and S6F).
Next, the role of METTL3/TBX15/MMP14 signaling axis in GC cell immune escape was further analyzed. Silencing METTL3 promoted the polarization of TAMs to M1 macrophages in the co-culture system of GC cell-macrophages (Fig. 7G and H; Fig. S6G and H; Fig. S7A and B). Levels of iNOS, IL-1β and TNF-α increased, and Arg-1, IL-10 and CD206 decreased (Fig. 7I and J; Fig. S6I and J). Overexpression of TBX15 reduced the effect of METTL3 silencing. In the co-culture system of MFC cell-CD8+ T cells, the expression of GZMB, PFP, CD100, IFN-γ and TNF-α increased after METTL3 silencing. Overexpression of TBX15 inhibited the regulation of METTL3 silencing on CD8+ T cell-related cytokines GZMB, PFP, CD100, IFN-γ and TNF-α (Fig. 7K). METTL3 regulated proliferation, migratory activity and immune escape process through TBX15/MMP14 signaling axis in GC.
The effect of METTL3/TBX15/MMP14 signaling axis on MFC cells' ability to induce tumorigenesis in mice was further analyzed. MFC cells with METTL3 silencing and TBX15 overexpression were injected subcutaneously into mice. After 21 days, tumor volume and weight were reduced after METTL3 silencing. Overexpression of TBX15 attenuated the effect of METTL3 silencing, and the tumor weight and volume (maximum diameter: 14.99 mm, maximum volume: 1,385.54 mm3) increased (Fig. 8A-C). Levels of METTL3, TBX15 and MMP14 were reduced after METTL3 silencing. Overexpression of TBX15 promoted TBX15 and MMP14 levels but had no significant regulatory effect on METTL3 (Fig. 8D and E). In the tumor, the apoptotic rate increased and the expression of Ki67 decreased after METTL3 silencing. Overexpression of TBX15 decreased the apoptotic rate and increased the expression of Ki67 (Fig. 8F and G). Similarly, the expression of M1 macrophage markers (iNOS, IL-1β and TNF-α) was increased after METTL3 silencing, and overexpression of TBX15 reduced the effect of METTL3 silencing. Levels of M2 macrophage markers (Arg-1, IL-10 and CD206) were opposite (Fig. 8H). Overexpression of TBX15 inhibited the regulation of METTL3 silencing on CD8+ T cell-related cytokines GZMB, PFP, CD100, IFN-γ and TNF-α (Figs. 8I and S8). The aforementioned results suggested that silencing METTL3 inhibits tumor development, via the TBX15/MMP14 signaling axis.
The experimental design of the present study is shown in Fig. S5. It is suggested that high expression of TBX15 in GC was linked to shorter survival of patients. Suppression of TBX15 led to elevated levels of apoptosis and hindered the proliferation and invasion of GC cells. Consistent with a previous study, TBX15 silencing stimulated increased apoptosis in cancer cells (44), and high levels of TBX15 predicted poor prognosis in patients with cancer (19). This evidence suggested that TBX15 is regulated by m6A methylation modification and interacts with the m6A methyltransferase METTL3. In a GC study, METTL3 was associated with tumor malignant progression and poor prognosis of patients (37). Silencing METTL3 reduced TBX15 mRNA stability. Overexpression of TBX15 reduced the inhibitory effect of METTL3 silencing on GC cell proliferation and invasion to a certain extent. Meanwhile, TBX15 could regulate the transcription of MMP14 by targeting its promoter. In GC, MMP14 is a target enzyme used to detect GC peritoneal metastasis (45), and its high expression predicts poor prognosis of patients with GC (46). As one of the membrane-type matrix metalloproteinases, MMP14 plays an important role in tumor development and metastasis by promoting the decomposition of cell adhesion molecules, destroying the basement membrane and destroying the extracellular matrix (47,48). Therefore, it is reasonable to hypothesize that TBX15 regulated by m6A methylation modification may have the involvement of MMP14 in controlling the migration and invasion process of GC cells.
In addition, overexpression of TBX15 reduced glycolysis, glucose uptake and lactate production in GC cells (21). The 'glycolytic switch', also known as the 'Warburg effect', can lead to the accumulation of lactate and lactate in the tumor environment, thereby promoting tumor immune escape (49). Overexpression of MMP14 reversed the inhibitory effect of TBX15 silencing on M2 macrophage polarization and the promoting effect on M1 macrophages in the GC cell-TAM cell co-culture system. M2 macrophages are important tumor supporting cells in tumor development and promote the immune escape of tumor cells by regulating the immune checkpoints (50,51). MMP14 was involved in the polarization of M2 macrophages (52). Blockade of MMP14 increases iNOS and polarizes macrophages to an antitumor phenotype (53). This further confirms the findings that TBX15, an intracellular transcription factor, regulates macrophage to tumor-promoting phenotypic polarization by targeting MMP14, thereby promoting cancer development. On the other hand, CD8+ T cells can participate in antitumor immunity by secreting inflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ and TNF-α) and cytotoxic factors (GZMB and PFP) (54). In the MFC cell-CD8+ T cell co-culture system, overexpression of MMP14 inhibited the expression of antitumor related cytokines of CD8+ T cells, including GZMB, PFP, IFN-γ and TNF-α. As effective effector cells in the TME, CD8+ T cells can induce tumor cell apoptosis by secreting cytotoxic factors (GZMB and PFP). In the tumor immune microenvironment, cells with high levels of MMP14 can transport tsRNA through exosomes and inhibit the activity of CD8+ T cells (55). MMP14 promotes the shedding of membrane-bound CD100 (mCD100) from the membrane of CD8+ T cells, thereby promoting the elevation of CD8+ T cell response (56). Thus, the TBX15/MMP14 signaling axis promotes tumor development and cancer cell immune escape in GC cells, possibly by promoting M2 macrophage polarization and inhibiting CD8+ T cell antitumor activity. In the future, the regulatory mechanism of MMP14 in immune escape of GC cells will be further refined.
It should be pointed out that the present study did not investigate whether m6A readers are involved in TBX15 mRNA stability or translational regulation. Considering that METTL3 mainly plays the function of m6A 'writer', the transmission of its regulatory effect is often dependent on the downstream mediation of the m6A readers. Therefore, the current study has not fully revealed the regulatory pathway of 'METTL3-m6A-Reader-TBX15', which is the main limitation and the direction of future research needs to be focused on improving. In future studies, it is planned to collect clinical samples and analyze the correlation between m6A readers and TBX15 based on clinical samples and further explore its internal regulatory pathways by RIP-qPCR and co-expression analysis of m6A readers. The authors acknowledge that although the clinical sample (n=10) provided preliminary evidence, it was insufficient to ensure statistical generalizability, and potential selection bias (for example from a single institution) cannot be ruled out. Validation in a larger multicenter cohort is needed. Limited to a single subcutaneous model may not fully recapitulate the heterogeneous human GC immune microenvironment, particularly immune cell composition and cytokine signaling. This is also one of the limitations of the present study. It would be helpful to construct an orthotopic tumor model to verify the role of target genes in tumor development in numerous ways. Alternatively, it is noted that the immortalized cell lines lack a patient-specific genetic background. Future studies using primary cells are needed. Other potential biases, including the lack of clinical follow-up and survival data, are a limitation of the present study. Continuing to collect patient follow-up and survival information is the authors' next arrangement.
The results of the present study demonstrated that the m6A modification of TBX15 is regulated by the m6A methyltransferase METTL3. TBX15 regulates GC cell proliferation, migration and invasion through MMP14. The METTL3/TBX15/MMP14 signaling axis promotes the polarization of macrophages to M2 and inhibits the antitumor activity of CD8+ T cells. The results of the present study suggested that TBX15 is involved in the process of proliferation, migration and invasion of GC cells. Combined with the results of GC cell-TAM cells and MFC cell-CD8+ T cell co-culture systems, it is suggested that TBX15 is connected with the polarization of macrophages in the TME and the antitumor activity of CD8+ T cells. This suggested that TBX15 may be a promising target for alleviating immunosuppression.
The data generated in the present study are included in the figures and/or tables of this article. The data generated in the present study may be requested from the corresponding author.
WQ and HH conceptualized the study, acquired funding and resources, and wrote, reviewed and edited the manuscript. HH, RH, ML, XL, QA, MC, QW, WC and WQ curated data. HH conducted rmal analysis, developed methodology, performed data validation and visualization, and wrote the original draft. HH, RH, ML, XL and MC conducted investigation. WQ conducted project administration and supervised the study. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. WQ and HS confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.
The procedures followed in the present study were approved (approval no. ZZCHEC2022070-01) by the Ethics Committee of Zhuzhou Central Hospital (Zhuzhou Hospital Affiliated to Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University; Zhuzhou, China). Written informed consent was obtained from each enrolled subject. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations and were approved by Animal Ethical and Welfare Committee of The Second Xiangya Hospital (approval no. 2022722; Zhuzhou, China).
Not applicable.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Not applicable.
The present study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan (grant nos. 2021JJ70076, 2023JJ50217, 2025JJ70002 and 2022JJ50104).
|
Qiu H, Cao S and Xu R: Cancer incidence, mortality, and burden in China: A time-trend analysis and comparison with the United States and United Kingdom based on the global epidemiological data released in 2020. Cancer Commun (Lond). 41:1037–1048. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tan P and Yeoh KG: Genetics and molecular pathogenesis of gastric adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology. 149:1153–1162.e3. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Zhang M, Zhong A, Liu H, Zhao L, Wang Y, Lu Z, Zhang L, Pan X, Liang Z, Gao L, et al: EZH2 loss promotes gastric squamous cell carcinoma. Nat Commun. 16:60322025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Tao B, Wang Z, Wang X, Song A, Liu J, Wang J, Zhang Q, Chen Z, Wang Z, Xu W, et al: An inherited predisposition allele promotes gastric cancer via enhancing deubiquitination-mediated activation of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition signaling. J Clin Invest. 135:e1796172025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network: Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature. 513:202–209. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Keller G, Grimm V, Vogelsang H, Bischoff P, Mueller J, Siewert JR and Höfler H: Analysis for microsatellite instability and mutations of the DNA mismatch repair gene hMLH1 in familial gastric cancer. Int J Cancer. 68:571–576. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Richards FM, McKee SA, Rajpar MH, Cole TR, Evans DG, Jankowski JA, McKeown C, Sanders DS and Maher ER: Germline E-cadherin gene (CDH1) mutations predispose to familial gastric cancer and colorectal cancer. Hum Mol Genet. 8:607–610. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lu L, Mullins CS, Schafmayer C, Zeißig S and Linnebacher M: A global assessment of recent trends in gastrointestinal cancer and lifestyle-associated risk factors. Cancer Commun (Lond). 41:1137–1151. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ajani JA, Lee J, Sano T, Janjigian YY, Fan D and Song S: Gastric adenocarcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 3:170362017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Matsuoka T and Yashiro M: Bioinformatics analysis and validation of potential markers associated with prediction and prognosis of gastric cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 25:58802024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Guan WL, He Y and Xu RH: Gastric cancer treatment: Recent progress and future perspectives. J Hematol Oncol. 16:572023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Farin HF, Bussen M, Schmidt MK, Singh MK, Schuster-Gossler K and Kispert A: Transcriptional repression by the T-box proteins Tbx18 and Tbx15 depends on Groucho corepressors. J Biol Chem. 282:25748–25759. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kispert A and Herrmann BG: The Brachyury gene encodes a novel DNA binding protein. Embo J. 12:3211–3220. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ahmed A, Syed JN, Chi L, Wang Y, Perez-Romero C, Lee D, Kocaqi E, Caballero A, Yang J, Escalante-Covarrubias Q, et al: KDM8 epigenetically controls cardiac metabolism to prevent initiation of dilated cardiomyopathy. Nat Cardiovasc Res. 2:174–191. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ye W, Wang Y, Hou S, Mei B, Liu X, Huang H, Zhou Q, Niu Y, Chen Y, Zhang M and Huang Q: USF3 modulates osteoporosis risk by targeting WNT16, RANKL, RUNX2, and two GWAS lead SNPs rs2908007 and rs4531631. Hum Mutat. 42:37–49. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Pan DZ, Miao Z, Comenho C, Rajkumar S, Koka A, Lee SHT, Alvarez M, Kaminska D, Ko A, Sinsheimer JS, et al: Identification of TBX15 as an adipose master trans regulator of abdominal obesity genes. Genome Med. 13:1232021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li P, Li Y, Bai S, Zhang Y and Zhao L: miR-4732-3p prevents lung cancer progression via inhibition of the TBX15/TNFSF11 axis. Epigenomics. 15:195–207. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ge Y, Jia B, Zhang P, Chen B, Liu L, Shi Y, Huang S, Liu X, Wang R, Xie Y, et al: TBX15 facilitates malignant progression of glioma by transcriptional activation of TXDNC5. iScience. 27:1089502024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yan D, Yu Y, Ni Q, Meng Q, Wu H, Ding S, Liu X, Tang C, Liu Q and Yang K: The overexpression and clinical significance of TBX15 in human gliomas. Sci Rep. 13:97712023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Golozar M, Motlagh AV, Mahdevar M, Peymani M, InanlooRahatloo K and Ghaedi K: TBX15 and SDHB expression changes in colorectal cancer serve as potential prognostic biomarkers. Exp Mol Pathol. 136:1048902024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Gu P and Wu LN: Sulforaphane targets the TBX15/KIF2C pathway to repress glycolysis and cell proliferation in gastric carcinoma cells. Nutr Cancer. 75:1263–1270. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wei G: RNA m6A modification, signals for degradation or stabilisation? Biochem Soc Trans. 52:707–717. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hu Y, Gong C, Li Z, Liu J, Chen Y, Huang Y, Luo Q, Wang S, Hou Y, Yang S and Xiao Y: Demethylase ALKBH5 suppresses invasion of gastric cancer via PKMYT1 m6A modification. Mol Cancer. 21:342022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Shu F, Liu H, Chen X, Liu Y, Zhou J, Tang L, Cao W, Yang S, Long Y, Li R, et al: m6A modification promotes EMT and metastasis of castration-resistant prostate cancer by upregulating NFIB. Cancer Res. 84:1947–1962. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang J, Zhang J, Liu H, Meng L, Gao X, Zhao Y, Wang C, Gao X, Fan A, Cao T, et al: N6-methyladenosine reader hnRNPA2B1 recognizes and stabilizes NEAT1 to confer chemoresistance in gastric cancer. Cancer Commun (Lond). 44:469–490. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Jin T, Yang L, Chang C, Luo H, Wang R, Gan Y, Sun Y, Guo Y, Tang R, Chen S, et al: HnRNPA2B1 ISGylation regulates m6A-Tagged mRNA selective export via ALYREF/NXF1 complex to foster breast cancer development. Adv Sci (Weinh). 11:e23076392024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Qiao Y, Sun Q, Chen X, He L, Wang D, Su R, Xue Y, Sun H and Wang H: Nuclear m6A reader YTHDC1 promotes muscle stem cell activation/proliferation by regulating mRNA splicing and nuclear export. Elife. 12:e827032023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Alarcón CR, Goodarzi H, Lee H, Liu X, Tavazoie S and Tavazoie SF: HNRNPA2B1 is a mediator of m(6)A-dependent nuclear RNA processing events. Cell. 162:1299–1308. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang X, Lu Z, Gomez A, Hon GC, Yue Y, Han D, Fu Y, Parisien M, Dai Q, Jia G, et al: N6-methyladenosine-dependent regulation of messenger RNA stability. Nature. 505:117–120. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
|
Bokar JA, Shambaugh ME, Polayes D, Matera AG and Rottman FM: Purification and cDNA cloning of the AdoMet-binding subunit of the human mRNA (N6-adenosine)-methyltransferase. RNA. 3:1233–1247. 1997.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zaccara S, Ries RJ and Jaffrey SR: Reading, writing and erasing mRNA methylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 20:608–624. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zeng Y, Luo Y, Zhao K, Liu SS, Wu KK, Wu YY, Du KK, Pan W, Dai Y, Liu Y, et al: m6A-mediated induction of 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase stimulates cholesterol synthesis and cAMP signaling to promote bladder cancer metastasis. Cancer Res. 84:3402–3418. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang J, Fan P, Shen P, Fan C, Zhao P, Shen Y, Dong K, Ling R, Chen S and Zhang J: XBP1s activates METTL3/METTL14 for ER-phagy and paclitaxel sensitivity regulation in breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 596:2168462024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li T, Hu PS, Zuo Z, Lin JF, Li X, Wu Q, Chen ZH, Zeng ZL, Wang F, Zheng J, et al: METTL3 facilitates tumor progression via an m(6)A-IGF2BP2-dependent mechanism in colorectal carcinoma. Mol Cancer. 18:1122019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang Q, Guo X, Li L, Gao Z, Su X, Ji M and Liu J: N(6)-methyladenosine METTL3 promotes cervical cancer tumorigenesis and Warburg effect through YTHDF1/HK2 modification. Cell Death Dis. 11:9112020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wang J, Yu H, Dong W, Zhang C, Hu M, Ma W, Jiang X, Li H, Yang P and Xiang D: N6-Methyladenosine-Mediated Up-Regulation of FZD10 regulates liver cancer stem cells' properties and lenvatinib resistance through WNT/β-catenin and hippo signaling pathways. Gastroenterology. 164:990–1005. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wei X, Huo Y, Pi J, Gao Y, Rao S, He M, Wei Q, Song P, Chen Y, Lu D, et al: METTL3 preferentially enhances non-m(6)A translation of epigenetic factors and promotes tumourigenesis. NaT cell Biol. 24:1278–1290. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Xu X and Li Y, Wu Y, Wang M, Lu Y, Fang Z, Wang H and Li Y: Increased ATF2 expression predicts poor prognosis and inhibits sorafenib-induced ferroptosis in gastric cancer. Redox Biol. 59:1025642023. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
He Z, Jiao H, An Q, Zhang X, Zengyangzong D, Xu J, Liu H, Ma L and Zhao W: Discovery of novel 4-phenylquinazoline-based BRD4 inhibitors for cardiac fibrosis. Acta Pharm Sin B. 12:291–307. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zheng Z, Lin F, Zhao B, Chen G, Wei G, Chen X, Nie R, Zhang R, Zhao Z, Zhou Z, et al: ALKBH5 suppresses gastric cancer tumorigenesis and metastasis by inhibiting the translation of uncapped WRAP53 RNA isoforms in an m6A-dependent manner. Mol Cancer. 24:192025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Wei J, Yin Y, Zhou J, Chen H, Peng J, Yang J and Tang Y: METTL3 potentiates resistance to cisplatin through m(6) A modification of TFAP2C in seminoma. J Cell Mol Med. 24:11366–11380. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Thorsson V, Gibbs DL, Brown SD, Wolf D, Bortone DS, Yang TH, Porta-Pardo E, Gao GF, Plaisier CL, Eddy JA, et al: The immune landscape of cancer. Immunity. 48:812–830.e814. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Arribas J, Giménez E, Marcos R and Velázquez A: Novel antiapoptotic effect of TBX15: overexpression of TBX15 reduces apoptosis in cancer cells. Apoptosis. 20:1338–1346. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ogawa S, Kubo H, Murayama Y, Kubota T, Yubakami M, Matsumoto T, Ohashi T, Okamoto K, Kuriki Y, Hanaoka K, et al: Matrix metalloprotease-14 is a target enzyme for detecting peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 35:1024202021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kasurinen A, Gramolelli S, Hagström J, Laitinen A, Kokkola A, Miki Y, Lehti K, Yashiro M, Ojala PM, Böckelman C and Haglund C: High tissue MMP14 expression predicts worse survival in gastric cancer, particularly with a low PROX1. Cancer Med. 8:6995–7005. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chen WC, Chang AC, Tsai HC, Liu PI, Huang CL, Guo JH, Liu CL, Liu JF, Thuong LHH and Tang CH: Bone sialoprotein promotes lung cancer osteolytic bone metastasis via MMP14-dependent mechanisms. Biochem Pharmacol. 211:1155402023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chen M, Qu H, Liang X, Huang Y, Yang Z, Lu P, Shi K, Chen P, Zhang Y, Zhou H, et al: Brachyury promotes proliferation and migration of colorectal cancer cells by targeting MMP14. Cancer Cell Int. 25:1322025. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Siska PJ, Singer K, Evert K, Renner K and Kreutz M: The immunological Warburg effect: Can a metabolic-tumor-stroma score (MeTS) guide cancer immunotherapy? Immunol Rev. 295:187–202. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
DeNardo DG, Barreto JB, Andreu P, Vasquez L, Tawfik D, Kolhatkar N and Coussens LM: CD4(+) T cells regulate pulmonary metastasis of mammary carcinomas by enhancing protumor properties of macrophages. Cancer Cell. 16:91–102. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yang H, Zhang Q, Xu M, Wang L, Chen X, Feng Y, Li Y, Zhang X, Cui W and Jia X: CCL2-CCR2 axis recruits tumor associated macrophages to induce immune evasion through PD-1 signaling in esophageal carcinogenesis. Mol Cancer. 19:412020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Qian J, Li J, Ma H and Ji W: Exosomal circ-ADRM1 promotes lung adenocarcinoma progression and induces macrophage M2 polarization through regulating MMP14 mRNA and protein. Anticancer Drugs. 34:333–343. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Ager EI, Kozin SV, Kirkpatrick ND, Seano G, Kodack DP, Askoxylakis V, Huang Y, Goel S, Snuderl M, Muzikansky A, et al: Blockade of MMP14 activity in murine breast carcinomas: Implications for macrophages, vessels, and radiotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 107:djv0172015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chen Q, Yin H, Jiang Z, He T, Xie Y, Mao W, Han J, Liu S, Lou W, Wu W, et al: Poor clinical outcomes and immunoevasive contexture in CD161+CD8+ T cells barren human pancreatic cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 12:e0086942024. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Wang J, Zheng C, Lu J, Xu X, Xiang G, Li J, Zhang J, Mu X and Lu Q: The mechanism of MMP14-positive tumor-associated fibroblast subsets in inhibiting PD-1 immunotherapy for esophageal cancer through exosomal tsRNA-10522. Funct Integr Genomics. 24:1862024. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Wang HM, Zhang XH, Ye LQ, Zhang K, Yang NN, Geng S, Chen J, Zhao SX, Yang KL and Fan FF: Insufficient CD100 shedding contributes to suppression of CD8(+) T-cell activity in non-small cell lung cancer. Immunology. 160:209–219. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |