Clinical effects of a chimeric anti-EpCAM monoclonal antibody in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma

  • Authors:
    • Maria Liljefors
    • Bo Nilsson
    • Jan Fagerberg
    • Peter Ragnhammar
    • Håkan Mellstedt
    • Jan-Erik Frödin
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: June 1, 2005     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.26.6.1581
  • Pages: 1581-1589
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The EpCAM antigen is highly expressed on colorectal carcinoma (CRC) cells. Murine anti-EpCAM MAb (anti-EpCAM mMAb) alone or in combination with cytokines may induce clinical responses including long-lasting complete remissions (CR) in patients with metastatic disease. The chimeric variant of anti-EpCAM MAb (anti-EpCAM cMAb) interacts more efficiently with human effector cells (ADCC) than the murine counterpart in the killing of colorectal carcinoma cells in vitro, an important mechanism of action for antibody in vivo. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) augments immune effector cell functions in vivo and may enhance the therapeutic effect of MAbs. In this study, the therapeutic efficacy of the combination of anti-EpCAM cMAb and GM-CSF was evaluated in 24 patients with metastatic CRC. GM-CSF was given s.c. once daily for 10 consecutive days and on day 3, anti-EpCAM cMAb was given i.v. A treatment cycle was repeated every 4th week. Five patients achieved stable disease >3 months (overall response rate 21%). Responding patients survived significantly longer than non-responding patients (p=0.030). The frequency of patients with an immediate-type allergic reaction (ITAR) against anti-EpCAM cMAb at the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th treatment cycles was as 13%, 29%, 25% and 19% respectively. Compared to a previous study where anti-EpCAM mMAb was used in a similar treatment regimen, the present protocol did not augment the overall or progression-free survival. The overall response rate was also similar to anti-EpCAM mMAb treated patients (6/22, 27%), but the anti-EpCAM mMAb treatment protocol induced two CR, one MR and three SD. Further studies are warranted to establish the role of EpCAM as a target for antibody therapy, specifically the significance of chimeric or humanized anti-EpCAM MAbs.

Related Articles

Journal Cover

June 2005
Volume 26 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1019-6439
Online ISSN:1791-2423

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Liljefors M, Nilsson B, Fagerberg J, Ragnhammar P, Mellstedt H and Frödin J: Clinical effects of a chimeric anti-EpCAM monoclonal antibody in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Int J Oncol 26: 1581-1589, 2005
APA
Liljefors, M., Nilsson, B., Fagerberg, J., Ragnhammar, P., Mellstedt, H., & Frödin, J. (2005). Clinical effects of a chimeric anti-EpCAM monoclonal antibody in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. International Journal of Oncology, 26, 1581-1589. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.26.6.1581
MLA
Liljefors, M., Nilsson, B., Fagerberg, J., Ragnhammar, P., Mellstedt, H., Frödin, J."Clinical effects of a chimeric anti-EpCAM monoclonal antibody in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma". International Journal of Oncology 26.6 (2005): 1581-1589.
Chicago
Liljefors, M., Nilsson, B., Fagerberg, J., Ragnhammar, P., Mellstedt, H., Frödin, J."Clinical effects of a chimeric anti-EpCAM monoclonal antibody in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma". International Journal of Oncology 26, no. 6 (2005): 1581-1589. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.26.6.1581