Open Access

Molecular imaging and targeted therapies in oncology: New concepts in treatment response assessment. A collection of cases

  • Authors:
    • M. A. Pantaleo
    • M. Nannini
    • E. Lopci
    • P. Castellucci
    • A. Maleddu
    • F. Lodi
    • C. Nanni
    • V. Allegri
    • M. Astorino
    • G. Brandi
    • M. Di Battista
    • S. Boschi
    • S. Fanti
    • G. Biasco
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 1, 2008     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo_00000026
  • Pages: 443-452
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The widespread use of several new non-cytotoxic drugs and the significant improvements in functional imaging highlights a number of difficulties in monitoring, interpreting and predicting treatment response in clinical practice. Certain guidelines for disease assessment after therapy are already available: the traditional Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours guidelines based on tumour size variations using conventional imaging technologies, the recent combined method developed by Choi and colleagues in gastrointestinal stromal tumour treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors based on tumour density variations using computed tomography (CT), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria based on tumour glucose metabolism variations using fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). At the moment combined PET/CT response criteria are still not available. A number of new PET compounds other than FDG are also currently being developed to visualize specific cellular and molecular tumour pathways but their role in assessment and prediction of cancer treatment response has not yet been thoroughly investigated in a large series. However, in clinical practice many oncologists treat cancer patients with targeted therapies or chemotherapy and evaluate the response using conventional or functional imaging without appropriate and standardized guidelines. The aim of this study was to present a selection of clinical cases that illustrate the usefulness of new PET tracers and efficacy evaluation of new drugs. In the era of molecular imaging and molecular therapies, these cases highlight the urgency to develop new criteria for treatment assessment and the exigency of correctly interpreting the biological information obtained from new technologies, and introduce new concepts that require further investigation in clinical trials.

Related Articles

Journal Cover

September 2008
Volume 33 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1019-6439
Online ISSN:1791-2423

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Pantaleo MA, Nannini M, Lopci E, Castellucci P, Maleddu A, Lodi F, Nanni C, Allegri V, Astorino M, Brandi G, Brandi G, et al: Molecular imaging and targeted therapies in oncology: New concepts in treatment response assessment. A collection of cases. Int J Oncol 33: 443-452, 2008
APA
Pantaleo, M.A., Nannini, M., Lopci, E., Castellucci, P., Maleddu, A., Lodi, F. ... Biasco, G. (2008). Molecular imaging and targeted therapies in oncology: New concepts in treatment response assessment. A collection of cases. International Journal of Oncology, 33, 443-452. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo_00000026
MLA
Pantaleo, M. A., Nannini, M., Lopci, E., Castellucci, P., Maleddu, A., Lodi, F., Nanni, C., Allegri, V., Astorino, M., Brandi, G., Di Battista, M., Boschi, S., Fanti, S., Biasco, G."Molecular imaging and targeted therapies in oncology: New concepts in treatment response assessment. A collection of cases". International Journal of Oncology 33.3 (2008): 443-452.
Chicago
Pantaleo, M. A., Nannini, M., Lopci, E., Castellucci, P., Maleddu, A., Lodi, F., Nanni, C., Allegri, V., Astorino, M., Brandi, G., Di Battista, M., Boschi, S., Fanti, S., Biasco, G."Molecular imaging and targeted therapies in oncology: New concepts in treatment response assessment. A collection of cases". International Journal of Oncology 33, no. 3 (2008): 443-452. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo_00000026