|
1
|
Tabar L, Yen MF, Vitak B, Chen HH, Smith
RA and Duffy SW: Mammography service screening and mortality in
breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after
introduction of screening. Lancet. 361:1405–1410. 2003.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
2
|
Tabar L, Tony Chen HH, Amy Yen MF, Tot T,
Tung TH, Chen LS, Chiu YH, Duffy SW and Smith RA: Mammographic
tumor features can predict long-term outcomes reliably in women
with 1–14-mm invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer. 101:1745–1759.
2004.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Seo BK, Pisano ED, Kuzimak CM, Koomen M,
Pavic D, Lee Y, Cole EB and Lee J: Correlation of HER-2/neu
overexpression with mammography and age distribution in primary
breast carcinomas. Acad Radiol. 13:1211–1218. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Yang WT, Hennessy B, Broglio K, Mills C,
Sneige N, Davis WG, Valero V, Hunt KK and Gilcrease MZ: Imaging
differences in metaplastic and invasive ductal carcinomas of the
breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 189:1288–1293. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Zhao J, Liu H, Wang M, Gu L, et al:
Characteristics and prognosis for molecular breast cancer subtypes
in Chinese women. J Surg Oncol. 100:89–94. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Breast Imaging Research Centre, American
College of Radiology and American College of Breast Imaging
Reporting and Data System. American College of Breast Imaging
Reporting and Data System. Am Coll Radiol. 1998.
|
|
7
|
Ildefonso C, Vazquez J, Guinea O, et al:
The mammographic appearance of breast carcinomas of invasive ductal
type: relationship with clinicopathological parameters, biological
features and prognosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Repord Biol.
136:224–231. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
8
|
Broberg A, Glas U, Gustafsson SA,
Hellström L and Somell A: Relationship between mammographic pattern
and estrogen receptor content in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res
Treat. 3:201–207. 1983. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Paradiso A, Ventrella V, Farchi G, et al:
Mammographic aspect, cell kinetics and hormone receptor status of
operable breast cancer. Oncology. 50:104–109. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Wilson TE, Helvie MA, Oberman HA and Joynt
LK: Pure and mixed mucinous carcinoma of the breast: pathologic
basis for differences in mammographic appearance. AJR Am J
Roentgenol. 165:285–289. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Ciatto S and Zappa M: A prospective study
of the value of mammographic patterns as indicators of breast
cancer risk in a screening experience. Eur J Radiol. 17:122–125.
1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Matsuda M, Yoshimoto M, Iwase T, et al:
Mammographic and clinicopathological features of mucinous carcinoma
of the breast. Breast Cancer. 7:65–70. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Günhan-Bilgen I and Oktay A: Tubular
carcinoma of the breast: mammographic, sonographic, clinical and
pathologic findings. Eur J Radiol. 61:158–162. 2007.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
Gajdos C, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss IJ, et al:
Mammographic appearance of nonpalpable breast cancer reflects
pathologic characteristics. Ann Surg. 235:246–251. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Enache DE, Georgescu CV and Pătrană N:
Negative estrogen-receptor invasive breast carcinoma: mammographic
aspects, correlations with HER2/neu oncoprotein status. Rom J
Morphol Embryol. 53(3 Suppl): 755–762. 2012.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Evans AJ, Pinder SE, Ellis IO, et al:
Correlations between the mammographic features of ductal carcinoma
in situ (DCIS) and C-erbB-2 oncogene expression. Nottingham Breast
Team. Clin Radiol. 49:559–562. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ,
Ullrich A and McGuire WL: Human breast cancer: correlation of
relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene.
Science. 235:177–182. 1987. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Gilliland FD, Joste N, Stauber PM, Hunt
WC, Rosenberg R, Redlich G and Key CR: Biologic characteristics of
interval and screen-detected breast cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst.
92:743–749. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
Porter PL, El-Bastawissi AY, Mandelson MT,
Lin MG, Khalid N, Watney EA, Cousens L, White D, Taplin S and White
E: Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic
detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J
Natl Cancer Inst. 91:2020–2028. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Sirvent JJ, Fortuño-Mar A, Olona M and
Orti A: Prognostic value of p53 protein expression and
clinicopathological factors in infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the
breast. A study of 192 patients. Histol Histopathol. 16:99–106.
2001.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Jalava P, Kuopio T, Juntti-Patinen L,
Kotkansalo T, Kronqvist P and Collan Y: Ki67 immunohistochemistry:
a valuable marker in prognostication but with a risk of
misclassification: proliferation subgroups formed based on Ki67
immunoreactivity and standardized mitotic index. Histopathology.
48:674–682. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
22
|
Shin HJ, Kim HH, Huh MO, Kim MJ, Yi A, Kim
H, Son BH and Ahn SH: Correlation between mammographic and
sonographic findings and prognostic factors in patients with
node-negative invasive breast cancer. Br J Radiol. 84:19–30. 2011.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Liu S, Chia SK, Mehl E, Leung S, Rajput A,
Cheang MC and Nielsen TO: Progesterone receptor is a significant
factor associated with clinical outcomes and effect of adjuvant
tamoxifen therapy in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res
Treat. 119:53–61. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Rotstein AH and Neerhut PK: Ultrasound
characteristics of histologically proven grade 3 invasive ductal
breast carcinoma. Australas Radiol. 49:476–479. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
25
|
Lamb PM, Perry NM, Vinnicombe SJ and Wells
CA: Correlation between ultrasound characteristics, mammographic
findings and histological grade in patients with invasive ductal
carcinoma of the breast. Clin Radiol. 55:40–44. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
26
|
Kollias J, Gill PG, Beamond B, et al:
Clinical and radiological predictors of complete excision in
breast-conserving surgery for primary breast cancer. Aust N Z J
Surg. 68:702–706. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar
|
