|
1
|
Antoch G, Saoudi N, Kuehl H, et al:
Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality
fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography
and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid
tumors: comparison with CT and PET. J Clin Oncol. 22:4357–4368.
2004. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
2
|
MacDonald K, Searle J and Lyburn I: The
role of dual time point FDG PET imaging in the evaluation of
solitary pulmonary nodules with an initial standard uptake value
less than 2.5. Clin Radiol. 66:244–250. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Shum WY, Hsieh TC, Yeh JJ, et al: Clinical
usefulness of dual-time FDG PET-CT in assessment of esophageal
squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Radiol. 81:1024–1028. 2012.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Xiu Y, Bhutani C, Dhurairaj T, et al:
Dual-time point FDG PET imaging in the evaluation of pulmonary
nodules with minimally increased metabolic activity. Clin Nucl Med.
32:101–105. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Hu Q, Wang W, Zhong X, et al:
Dual-time-point FDG PET for the evaluation of locoregional lymph
nodes in thoracic esophageal squamous cell cancer. Eur J Radiol.
70:320–324. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Hong R, Halama J, Bova D, Sethi A and
Emami B: Correlation of PET standard uptake value and CT
window-level thresholds for target delineation in CT-based
radiation treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.
67:720–726. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Leong T, Everitt C, Yuen K, et al: A
prospective study to evaluate the impact of FDG-PET on CT-based
radiotherapy treatment planning for oesophageal cancer. Radiother
Oncol. 78:254–261. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Zhu D, Ma T, Niu Z, et al: Prognostic
significance of metabolic parameters measured by
18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed
tomography in patients with small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer.
73:332–337. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
9
|
Naruke T, Suemasu K and Ishikawa S:
Surgical treatment for lung cancer with metastasis to mediastinal
lymph nodes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 71:279–285. 1976.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Martini N and Flehinger BJ: The role of
surgery in N2 lung cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 67:1037–1049.
1987.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Izbicki JR, Thetter O, Habekost M, et al:
Radical systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy in non-small cell
lung cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg. 81:229–235.
1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Tsim S, O'Dowd CA, Milroy R and Davidson
S: Staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a review. Respir
Med. 104:1767–1774. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
Wrona A and Jassem J: The new TNM
classification in lung cancer. Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 78:407–417.
2010.(In Polish).
|
|
14
|
Antoch G, Stattaus J, Nemat AT, et al:
Non-small cell lung cancer: dual-modality PET/CT in preoperative
staging. Radiology. 229:526–533. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Dwamena BA, Sonnad SS, Angobaldo JO and
Wahl RL: Metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: mediastinal
staging in the 1990s-meta-analytic comparison of PET and CT.
Radiology. 213:530–536. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Hu M, Han A, Xing L, et al: Value of
dual-time-point FDG PET/CT for mediastinal nodal staging in
non-small-cell lung cancer patients with lung comorbidity. Clin
Nucl Med. 36:429–433. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
de Geus-Oei LF, van Krieken JH, Aliredjo
RP, et al: Biological correlates of FDG uptake in non-small cell
lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 55:79–87. 2007.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Li M, Liu N, Hu M, et al: Relationship
between primary tumor fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and nodal or
distant metastases at presentation in T1 stage non-small cell lung
cancer. Lung Cancer. 63:383–386. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
19
|
Higashi K, Ueda Y, Yagishita M, et al: FDG
PET measurement of the proliferative potential of non-small cell
lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 41:85–92. 2000.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Higashi K, Ueda Y, Ayabe K, et al: FDG PET
in the evaluation of the aggressiveness of pulmonary
adenocarcinoma: correlation with histopathological features. Nucl
Med Commun. 21:707–714. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
21
|
Duhaylongsod FG, Lowe VJ, Jr Patz EF ,
Vaughn AL, Coleman RE and Wolfe WG: Lung tumor growth correlates
with glucose metabolism measured by fluoride-18 fluorodeoxyglucose
positron emission tomography. Ann Thorac Surg. 60:1348–1352. 1995.
View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
22
|
Guo J, Higashi K, Ueda Y, et al:
Microvessel density: correlation with 18F-FDG uptake and prognostic
impact in lung adenocarcinomas. J Nucl Med. 47:419–425.
2006.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Boellaard R, Krak NC, Hoekstra OS and
Lammertsma AA: Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI
definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation
study. J Nucl Med. 45:1519–1527. 2004.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
24
|
Westerterp M, Pruim J, Oyen W, et al:
Quantification of FDG PET studies using standardised uptake values
in multi-centre trials: effects of image reconstruction, resolution
and ROI definition parameters. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging.
34:392–404. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar
|