|
1
|
Ellis O, Humphreys S, Michell M, Pinder
SE, Wells CA and Zakhour HD: Guidelines for non-operative
diagnostic procedures and reporting in cancer screening. NHSBSP
Publications. 50:35–40. 2001.
|
|
2
|
Rakha EA and Ellis IO: An overview of
assessment of prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer
needle core biopsy specimens. J Clin Pathol. 60:1300–1306. 2007.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Lee AH, Denley HE, Pinder SE, Ellis IO,
Elston CW, Vujovic P, Macmillan RD and Evans AJ: Nottingham Breast
Team: Excision biopsy findings of patients with breast needle core
biopsies reported as suspicious of malignancy (B4) or lesion of
uncertain malignant potential (B3). Histopathology. 42:331–336.
2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Houssami N, Ciatto S, Bilous M, Vezzosi V
and Bianchi S: Borderline breast core needle histology: Predictive
values for malignancy in lesions of uncertain malignant potential
(B3). Br J Cancer. 96:1253–1257. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Dillon MF, McDermott EW, Hill AD,
O'Doherty A, O'Higgins N and Quinn CM: Predictive value of breast
lesions of ‘uncertain malignant potential’ and ‘suspicious for
malignancy’ determined by needle core biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol.
14:704–711. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
Maclean GM, Courtney SP, Umeh H, Sanjeev
S, McCormick C and Smith BM: Is mode of presentation of B3 breast
core biopsies (screen-detected or symptomatic) a distinguishing
factor in the final histopathologic result or risk of diagnosis of
malignancy? World J Surg. 37:2607–2612. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Liberman L: Clinical management issues in
percutaneous core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am. 38:791–807.
2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Ellis IO, Humphreys S, Michell M, Pinder
SE, Wells CA and Zakhour HD: UK National Coordinating Committee for
the Breast Screening Pathology; European Commission Working Group
on Breast Screening Pathology: Best Practice No 179. Guidelines for
breast needle core biopsy handling and reporting in breast
screening assessment. J Clin Pathol. 57:897–902. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Lieske B, Ravichandran D, Alvi A, Lawrence
DA and Wright DJ: Screen-detected breast lesions with an
indeterminate (B3) core needle biopsy should be excised. Eur J Surg
Oncol. 34:1293–1298. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Weigel S, Decker T, Korsching E,
Biesheuvel C, Wöstmann A, Böcker W, Hungermann D, Roterberg K, Tio
J and Heindel W: Minimal invasive biopsy results of ‘uncertain
malignant potential’ in digital mammography screening: High
prevalence but also high predictive value for malignancy. Rofo.
183:743–748. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Rajan S, Shaaban AM, Dall BJ and Sharma N:
New patient pathway using vacuum-assisted biopsy reduces diagnostic
surgery for B3 lesions. Clin Radiol. 67:244–249. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
12
|
Bernardi D, Borsato G, Pellegrini M,
Tuttobene P, Fanto C, Valentini M, Aldovini D and Ciatto S: On the
diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy of
nonpalpable breast abnormalities. Results in a consecutive series
of 769 procedures performed at the Trento department of breast
diagnosis. Tumori. 98:113–118. 2012.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
13
|
El-Sayed ME, Rakha EA, Reed J, Lee AH,
Evans AJ and Ellis IO: Predictive value of needle core biopsy
diagnoses of lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) in
abnormalities detected by mammographic screening. Histopathology.
53:650–657. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
14
|
Bianchi S, Bendinelli B, Saladino V,
Vezzosi V, Brancato B, Nori J and Palli D: Non-malignant breast
papillary lesions-B3 diagnosed on ultrasound-guided 14-gauge needle
core biopsy: Analysis of 114 cases from a single institution and
review of the literature. Pathol Oncol Res. 21:535–546. 2015.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
15
|
Lacquement MA, Mitchell D and
Hollingsworth AB: Positive predictive value of the breast imaging
reporting and data system. J Am Coll Surg. 189:34–40. 1999.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Orel SG, Kay N, Reynolds C and Sullivan
DC: BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology.
211:845–850. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Barth V: Atlas der Mammadiagnostik:
Mammographie und Sonographie Intensiv Trainieren (2nd). Thieme,
Stuttgart: 972006.
|
|
18
|
Tonegutti M, Girardi V, Ciatto S, Manfrin
E and Bonetti F: B3 breast lesions determined by vacuum-assisted
biopsy: How to reduce the frequency of benign excision biopsies.
Radiol Med. 115:1246–1257. 2010.(In English, Italian). View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
de Beça FF, Rasteiro C, Correia A, Costa S
and Amendoeira I: Improved malignancy prediction by B3 breast
lesions subclassification. Ann Diagn Pathol. 17:434–436. 2013.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
20
|
Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Gynäkologische
Onkologie. http://www.ago-online.de/fileadmin/downloads/leitlinien/mamma/maerz/2014/de/2014D_06_Laesionen_mit_unsicherem_biologischen_Potenzial_(B3).pdfAccessed.
March 27–2014
|
|
21
|
Londero V, Zuiani C, Linda A, Battigelli
L, Brondani G and Bazzocchi M: Borderline breast lesions:
Comparison of malignancy underestimation rates with 14-gauge core
needle biopsy versus 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device. Eur Radiol.
21:1200–1206. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
