Diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma with left adrenal metastasis via transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound‑guided fine‑needle aspiration biopsy: A case report

Introduction

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) bronchoscopy has been well described in the diagnosis of pulmonary diseases, particularly lung cancer, due to its usefulness in the evaluation of hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes as a diagnostic and staging method (1). Recently, EUS-FNA qualified as a surgical mediastinal staging procedure due to its safety and minimal invasiveness, and is recommended by international guidelines (2). To date, numerous publications have established the value of EUS-FNA in the assessment of mediastinal nodes, as well as the adrenal glands (3–6). Although accumulating evidence has confirmed the efficacy of EUS in the staging of mediastinal nodes, the application of EUS-FNA is not yet widely applied in the diagnosis of patients with lung cancer (7,8). We herein report a case of stage IV lung adenocarcinoma metastatic to the left adrenal gland, which was finally diagnosed by EUS-FNA biopsy. To the best of our knowledge, the present case may be the first to affirm the validity of the use of EUS-FNA as a first-line minimally invasive staging procedure for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in China.

Case report

A 62-year-old Han Chinese woman was admitted to the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine (Shanghai, China) in May 2017, with complaints of a non-productive cough persisting for 3 months and a history of passive smoking. No abnormalities were found on routine physical examination. The laboratory tests demonstrated that the serum carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen-125 levels were elevated to 156.7 ng/ml (normal range, 0–5.2 ng/ml) and 85.23 ng/ml (normal range, 0–35 ng/ml), respectively. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest revealed a hypodense soft mass (size, 2.3×2.2 cm) with the spicule sign in the right upper lobe; an enlarged paratracheal lymph node in the superior mediastinum (4R) was also identified (Fig. 1A and B). The patient was then scheduled to undergo a 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET) scan and the results demonstrated abnormal 18FDG uptake by the pulmonary mass of the right upper lobe [maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) 13.5], the right paratracheal lymph node (4R) (SUVmax, 13.0) (Fig. 2A), as well as the left adrenal gland (SUVmax, 13.6) (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, irregular shape of the left adrenal gland, with dimensions 3.8×2.7 cm, was also observed (Fig. 2B). These findings strongly indicated that the pulmonary lesion was a malignant tumor. Moreover, the enlarged and 18FDG-PET-positive left adrenal gland was also highly likely to be a metastatic site. Routine bronchoscopy was initially performed to assess the airways, and it revealed an obstruction of the bronchus opening at the apical segment of the right upper lobe, without detection of any neoplasm (Fig. 3). Subsequently, EUS-FNA was suggested as a minimally invasive test for the confirmation of suspected metastasis to the left adrenal gland. EUS was conducted in a standardized manner at an endoscopy room under conscious sedation using propofol (9). The vessels surrounding the left adrenal were evaluated with color flow Doppler; then, the optimal lesion site (hypoechoic involvement in the left adrenal gland) was punctured using a 22-gauge needle, guided by real-time ultrasound imaging (Fig. 4). FNA was repeated until sufficient tissue samples were obtained. Subsequently, the samples were processed and stained for cytological analysis. Histopathological examination of the EUS-FNA samples demonstrated an adenocarcinoma. The results of immunohistochemical examination indicated metastatic adenocarcinoma from the primary lung cancer (Fig. 5). Consequently, our patient was treated with gefitinib due to the presence of epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation. The physical status of the patient has currently been under control since the treatment with gefitinib for ~10 months.

Figure 1. A chest computed tomography image showing (A) a 2.3×2.2-cm hypodense mass in the upper lobe of the right lung and (B) an enlarged paratracheal lymph node.

Figure 2. An integrated PET-CT image showing accumulated 18FDG uptake (A) in a lung mass localizing in the right upper lobe and (B) an enlarged mediastinal lymph node (arrows). PET, positron emission tomography; CT, computed tomography; FDG, fluorodeoxyglucose.

Figure 3. Bronchoscopic image showing an obstruction of the bronchus opening at the apical segment of the right upper lobe.

Figure 4. Application of EUS-FNA for the evaluation of an enlarged left adrenal. EUS, endoscopic ultrasound; FNA, fine-needle aspiration; LAG, left adrenal gland; N, needle.

Figure 5. Cytological diagnosis of the adrenal tissue biopsied by EUS-FNA revealing adenocarcinoma cells (stained using the Giemsa method; magnification, ×40). EUS, endoscopic ultrasound; FNA, fine-needle aspiration.

Discussion

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide (10). The majority of new cases of lung cancer (≤80%) are NSCLCs (11). Chest CT and integrated PET scans are widely available non-invasive methods for the assessment of suspected NSCLC; however, their efficacy is limited by their relatively low sensitivity (58 and 74%, respectively) and specificity (85% for both) (12). Bronchoscopy is usually required to diagnose or evaluate pulmonary lesions. In terms of minimally invasive techniques, EBUS has the best yield regarding hilar, intrapulmonary, anterior and superior mediastinal lymph nodes. Hence, EBUS is suitable for lymph nodes located in the anterosuperior mediastinum, as well as paratracheal regions (13). On the contrary, patients with enlarged posteroinferior mediastinal or subcarinal lymph nodes may benefit from EUS as a primary staging procedure. The selection of EUS or EBUS is mainly determined by the location of the lymph nodes (14). For mediastinal staging, these two invasive methods may complement each other. Furthermore, compared with EBUS, EUS may detect distant metastatic lesions to subdiaphragmatic organs, including the left adrenal gland and the liver, which adds another advantage with respect to metastatic lung cancer (15).

In the present case, routine bronchoscopy was initially performed, but no mass was detected in the trachea. Accordingly, transbronchial lung biopsy could not be performed. Thus, it was crucial to verify the suspected malignant involvement for the definitive diagnosis. The paratracheal lymph node (4R) and the left adrenal gland were both found to harbor metastatic lesions on CT and 18FDG-PET imaging. In theory, EBUS-guided transbronchial needle aspirate (EBUS-TBNA) and EUS-FNA may be applied to perform a biopsy of the target lesion. However, the mediastinal nodes are surrounded by elements of the cardiopulmonary system, vasculature and skeletal components, which makes tissue sampling challenging (16). It was reported that EBUS-TBNA may be associated with occasional serious complications, such as pneumothorax and respiratory failure requiring ventilation (17). In addition, unlike the trachea, the esophagus is flexible. Using magnified real-time imaging, the operator may approach the adrenal gland, easily avoiding the pancreas and local great vessels and reducing the risk of injuring the pleural space under EUS examination. In this manner, biopsy of the adrenal lesion is safer and simpler. A meta-analysis of 18 studies including a total of 1,201 patients reported that the rate of complications caused by EUS-FNA was as low as 0.8% (only 10 cases) (18). In conclusion, EUS-FNA was considered as a superior technique for the assessment of the metastatic lesions, and a definitive diagnosis of the metastasis to the left adrenal from the primary lung adenocarcinoma was finally confirmed.

As previously reported, the adrenal glands are the fourth most common metastatic site in lung cancer (19). Of note, metastases to left adrenal gland are significantly more common compared with those to the right adrenal (20). In the present case, the PET findings were consistent with those of previous reports. Given that the left adrenal is easily accessible through the stomach and may be easily visualized and real-time sampled by EUS, EUS may be considered as the preferred approach to the biopsy of left adrenal lesions (6). The utility of EUS-FNA has been broadened to provide tissue evidence of suspected left adrenal metastases in lung malignancies (21). Schuurbiers et al demonstrated that EUS-FNA has a relatively high sensitivity (86%) and positive predictive value (70%) for malignant lesions in the left adrenal gland (22). Thus, EUS-FNA is a staging tool valuable for identifying metastases to the left adrenal gland in patients with lung cancer.

Although EUS may serve as a replacement for EBUS in assessing mediastinal lymph nodes, the application of EUS-FNA for diagnosing lung malignancies remains limited and controversial. Reddy et al reported that the majority of oncologists in the US did not consider EUS to be helpful for NSCLC staging, with very few (<20%) selecting this procedure as a diagnostic tool (23). Therefore, it is crucial to ameliorate the application of EUS in the staging of lung cancer. In the present case, the diagnostic value of EUS-FNA in lung cancer with suspected left adrenal metastasis was confirmed and, although performing EBUS may be possible, EUS-FNA may also be utilized as the first-line approach to detecting suspected lung malignancy, improving the application of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of lung cancer with nodal or distant metastases.

From this case study of primary lung adenocarcinoma with mediastinal lymph node and left adrenal metastases described above, left adrenal biopsy via EUS-FNA was found to be an efficient approach to obtaining a final definitive diagnosis. The feasibility and validity of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis and staging of NSCLC was also demonstrated. Even when EBUS is not difficult to perform, EUS-FNA may also be an alternative option for first-line staging in NSCLC.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of materials and data

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Authors' contributions

ML analyzed the clinical data and drafted the manuscript. YS provided the imaging data. HL performed the bronchoscopy. MX was the gastroenterologist who performed the EUS-FNA. QZ conducted follow-up on the patient in the outpatient clinic. ZG contributed to critical review and supervised the entire work. All the authors have read and approved the final version of this manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests to disclose.

References