Assessment of acute obstructive pancreatitis by magnetic resonance imaging: Predicting the occurrence of pancreatic
fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy

Shi,Zhenshan; Li,Xiumei; Li,Yueming; You,Ruixiong; Cao,Dairong; Chen,Qunlin; Ramen,Kamisha; Loosa,Vikash Sahadeo

doi:10.3892/mco.2019.1799

March-2019 Volume 10 Issue 3

Full Size Image

Journals

International Journal of Molecular Medicine

International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.

International Journal of Oncology

International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.

Molecular Medicine Reports

Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.

Oncology Reports

Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.

Oncology Letters

Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.

Biomedical Reports

Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.

Molecular and Clinical Oncology

International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.

World Academy of Sciences Journal

Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.

International Journal of Functional Nutrition

Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.

International Journal of Epigenetics

Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.

Medicine International

An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.

March-2019 Volume 10 Issue 3

Full Size Image

Article

Assessment of acute obstructive pancreatitis by magnetic resonance imaging: Predicting the occurrence of pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy

Authors:
- Zhenshan Shi
- Xiumei Li
- Yueming Li
- Ruixiong You
- Dairong Cao
- Qunlin Chen
- Kamisha Ramen
- Vikash Sahadeo Loosa
View Affiliations / Copyright

Affiliations: Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350005, P.R. China, Department of Radiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, P.R. China
Pages: 371-376
|
Published online on: January 9, 2019

https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2019.1799
Expand metrics +

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of preoperative acute obstructive pancreatitis on the risk of the occurrence of pancreatic fistula (PF) following pancreaticoduodenectomy. A total of 22 patients who developed postoperative PF were carefully matched with 22 control patients without PF according to demographic data, pancreatic pathology, presenting symptoms and other surgery‑associated parameters. These parameters were compared between these two groups. The mean pancreatic apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the fistula group were 1.14±0.31x10‑3 mm2/s, which was significantly decreased compared with the non‑fistula group (1.48±0.44x10‑3 mm2/s) (P=0.005). The pancreas‑muscle signal intensity (SI) ratio on fat‑suppressed T1 weighted image (rT1) in the fistula group was 1.71±0.25, which was significantly increased compared with the non‑fistula group (1.25±0.29) (P<0.001). The pancreas‑muscle SI ratios on fat‑suppressed T2 weighted image (T2WI) in the fistula group and the non‑fistula group were 0.72±0.08 and 0.62±0.07, respectively (P=0.79). There was no significant difference in pancreas‑muscle SI ratio on fat‑suppressed T2‑weighted image (rT2) value between these two groups. Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve, the optimal cut‑off value of ADC as a criterion for prediction of pancreatic fistula was 1.29x10‑3 mm2/s, which yielded a sensitivity of 77.3% and a specificity of 63.6%. In conclusion, the severity of acute obstructive pancreatitis was negatively associated with ADC values and pancreas‑muscle SI ratio on rT1 images, which may be useful for predicting the occurrence of PF preoperatively.

View Figures

View References

1	Freelove R and Walling AD: Pancreatic cancer: Diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 73:485–492. 2006.PubMed/NCBI
2	Balcom JH IV, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y and Fernandez-del Castillo C: Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: Changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg. 136:391–398. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
3	Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, de Haan RJ, de Wit LT, Busch OR and Obertop H: Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg. 232:786–795. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
4	Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Kaufman HS and Coleman J: One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg. 217:430–438. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
5	Aranha GV, Aaron JM, Shoup M and Pickleman J: Current management of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery. 140:561–569. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
6	Bassi C, Butturini G, Molinari E, Mascetta G, Salvia R, Falconi M, Gumbs A and Pederzoli P: Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions. Dig Surg. 21:54–59. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
7	Mathur A, Pitt HA, Marine M, Saxena R, Schmidt CM, Howard TJ, Nakeeb A, Zyromski NJ and Lillemoe KD: Fatty pancreas: A factor in postoperative pancreatic fistula. Ann Surg. 246:1058–1064. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
8	Yoon JH, Lee JM, Lee KB, Kim SW, Kang MJ, Jang JY, Kannengiesser S, Han JK and Choi BI: Pancreatic steatosis and fibrosis: Quantitative assessment with preoperative multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology. 279:140–150. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
9	Kim Z, Kim MJ, Kim JH, Jin SY, Kim YB, Seo D, Choi D, Hur KY, Kim JJ, Lee MH and Moon C: Prediction of post-operative pancreatic fistula in pancreaticoduodenectomy patients using pre-operative MRI: A pilot study. HPB (Oxford). 11:215–221. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
10	Scialpi M, Cagini L, Pierotti L, De Santis F, Pusiol T, Piscioli I, Magli M, D'Andrea A, Brunese L and Rotondo A: Detection of small (≤2 cm) pancreatic adenocarcinoma and surrounding parenchyma: correlations between enhancement patterns at triphasic MDCT and histologic features. BMC Gastroenterol. 14:162014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
11	Fukumura Y, Kumasaka T, Mitani K, Karita K and Suda K: Expression of transforming growth factor beta1, beta2, and beta3 in chronic, cancer-associated, obstructive pancreatitis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 130:356–361. 2006.PubMed/NCBI
12	Kamisawa T, Takuma K, Anjiki H, Egawa N, Hata T, Kurata M, Honda G, Tsuruta K, Suzuki M, Kamata N and Sasaki T: Differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer by diffusion-weighted MRI. Am J Gastroenterol. 105:1870–1875. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
13	Muraoka N, Uematsu H, Kimura H, Imamura Y, Fujiwara Y, Murakami M, Yamaguchi A and Itoh H: Apparent diffusion coefficient in pancreatic cancer: Characterization and histopathological correlations. J Magn Reson Imaging. 27:1302–1308. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
14	Rosso E, Casnedi S, Pessaux P, Oussoultzoglou E, Panaro F, Mahfud M, Jaeck D and Bachellier P: The role of ‘fatty pancreas’ and of BMI in the occurrence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 13:1845–1851. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
15	Lee SE, Jang JY, Lim CS, Kang MJ, Kim SH, Kim MA and Kim SW: Measurement of pancreatic fat by magnetic resonance imaging: Predicting the occurrence of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 251:932–936. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
16	Molinari E, Bassi C, Salvia R, Butturini G, Crippa S, Talamini G, Falconi M and Pederzoli P: Amylase value in drains after pancreatic resection as predictive factor of postoperative pancreatic fistula: Results of a prospective study in 137 patients. Ann Surg. 246:281–287. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
17	Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W and Buchler M: International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition: Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 138:8–13. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
18	Puig-Diví V, Molero X, Vaquero E, Salas A, Guarner F and Malagelada J: Ethanol feeding aggravates morphological and biochemical parameters in experimental chronic pancreatitis. Digestion. 60:166–174. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
19	Puig-Diví V, Molero X, Salas A, Guarner F, Guarner L and Malagelada JR: Induction of chronic pancreatic disease by trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid infusion into rat pancreatic ducts. Pancreas. 13:417–424. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
20	Butturini G, Marcucci S, Molinari E, Mascetta G, Landoni L, Crippa S and Bassi C: Complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: The problem of current definitions. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 13:207–211. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
21	Tajima Y, Kuroki T, Tsuneoka N, Adachi T, Kosaka T, Okamoto T, Takatsuki M, Eguchi S and Kanematsu T: Anatomy-specific pancreatic stump management to reduce the risk of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. World J Surg. 33:2166–2176. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
22	Sanjay P, Fawzi A, Fulke JL, Kulli C, Tait IS, Zealley IA and Polignano FM: Late post pancreatectomy haemorrhage. Risk factors and modern management. JOP. 11:220–225. 2010.PubMed/NCBI
23	Yencilek E, Telli S, Tekesin K, Ozgür A, Cakır O, Türkoğlu O, Meriç K and Simşek M: The efficacy of diffusion weighted imaging for detection of acute pancreatitis and comparison of subgroups according to Balthazar classification. Turk J Gastroenterol. 25:553–557. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
24	Akisik MF, Aisen AM, Sandrasegaran K, Jennings SG, Lin C, Sherman S, Lin JA and Rydberg M: Assessment of chronic pancreatitis: Utility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with secretin enhancement. Radiology. 250:103–109. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
25	Shinya S, Sasaki T, Nakagawa Y, Guiquing Z, Yamamoto F and Yamashita Y: Acute pancreatitis successfully diagnosed by diffusion-weighted imaging: A case report. World J Gastroenterol. 14:5478–5480. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
26	Frozanpor F, Loizou L, Ansorge C, Segersvärd R, Lundell L and Albiin N: Preoperative pancreas CT/MRI characteristics predict fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg. 36:1858–1865. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
27	Lewin M, Poujol-Robert A, Boëlle PY, Wendum D, Lasnier E, Viallon M, Guéchot J, Hoeffel C, Arrivé L, Tubiana JM and Poupon R: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 46:658–665. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
28	Yoshikawa T, Kawamitsu H, Mitchell DG, Ohno Y, Ku Y, Seo Y, Fujii M and Sugimura K: ADC measurement of abdominal organs and lesions using parallel imaging technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 187:1521–1530. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
29	Patel J, Sigmund EE, Rusinek H, Oei M, Babb JS and Taouli B: Diagnosis of cirrhosis with intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI alone and in combination: Preliminary experience. J Magn Reson Imaging. 31:589–600. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
30	Kah Heng CA, Salleh I, San TS, Ying F and Su-Ming T: Pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: Incidence, risk factors and management. ANZ J Surg. 80:619–623. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
31	Watanabe H, Kanematsu M, Tanaka K, Osada S, Tomita H, Hara A, Goshima S, Kondo H, Kawada H, Noda Y, et al: Fibrosis and postoperative fistula of the pancreas: Correlation with MR imaging findings-preliminary results. Radiology. 270:791–799. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
32	Jimenez RE and Hawkins WG: Emerging strategies to prevent the development of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. Surgery. 152 (3 Suppl 1):S64–S70. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
33	Harada N, Ishizawa T, Inoue Y, Aoki T, Sakamoto Y, Hasegawa K, Sugawara Y, Tanaka M, Fukayama M and Kokudo N: Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of the pancreas for estimation of pathologic fibrosis and risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula. J Am Coll Surg. 219:887–894.e5. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
34	Chang YR, Kang JS, Jang JY, Jung WH, Kang MJ, Lee KB and Kim SW: Prediction of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy based on cross-sectional images. World J Surg. 41:1610–1617. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
35	Wiggermann P, Grützmann R, Weissenböck A, Kamusella P, Dittert DD and Stroszczynski C: Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements of the pancreas, pancreas carcinoma, and mass-forming focal pancreatitis. Acta Radiol. 53:135–139. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
36	Gallix BP, Bret PM, Atri M, Lecesne R and Reinhold C: Comparison of qualitative and quantitative measurements on unenhanced T1-weighted fat saturation MR images in predicting pancreatic pathology. J Magn Reson Imaging. 21:583–589. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
37	Barral M, Sebbag-Sfez D, Hoeffel C, Chaput U, Dohan A, Eveno C, Boudiaf M and Soyer P: Characterization of focal pancreatic lesions using normalized apparent diffusion coefficient at 1.5-Tesla: Preliminary experience. Diagn Interv Imaging. 94:619–627. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI