A 5‑year follow‑up of vulval swelling due to extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma: A rare case report

Introduction

Vulval cancer is a rare malignancy, with ~1,300 new cases diagnosed annually in the UK (1). The most common histological subtype is squamous cell carcinoma, accounting for 90% of all cases. Sarcomas encompass a group of tumours of mesenchymal origin and account for only 3% of cancers affecting the female genital tract (2). Most sarcomas affect the uterine body; however, 1–3% of the cases affect the vulva (3). Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (EMC) is a rare subtype of sarcoma, which was first described in 1972 by Enzinger and Shiraki (4). Since that time, there have been few reported cases of this rare tumour in the literature, and fewer still reported to affect the female genital tract (Table I) (5–10). EMCs tend to affect patients in the 6th decade of life and have a predilection for the deep soft tissue of the lower extremities.

Table I. Literature review of reported cases of vulval extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma.

Table I.

Literature review of reported cases of vulval extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma.

Author (Refs.)	Year	Patient no.	Age, years	Site	Management	Margins	Adjuvant treatment	Follow-up (months)	Recurrence
Santacruz et al (5)	2005	1	46	Vulva/periclitoral	Surgical excision	Clear	Nil	6	No
Khan et al (6)	2011	1	66	Labium majus	Surgical excision	Clear	Refused by patient	12	No
Sawada et al (7)	2011	1	24	Right labium majus	Modified vulvectomy	Clear	Nil	24	No
Jeh et al (8)	2013	3	68	Right labium majus	Surgical excision	Clear	Nil	30	No
			52	Left labium majus	Surgical excision	Clear	Nil	24	No
			59	Left labium majus	Surgical excision	Clear	Nil	24	No
Dotlic et al (9)	2013	2	52	Left labium majus	Surgical excision	Not mentioned	Repeated surgery due to recurrence and 7 cycles chemotherapy	12	Yes - local and 12 months following diagnosis lung metastasis causing death
			52	Left vulva	Surgical excision	Not mentioned	Not mentioned	Not mentioned
Villert et al (10)	2015	1	32	Labia majora	Surgical excision	Not mentioned	Intraoperative radiotherapy	12	5/12 post-op inguinal node treatment: excision/radiotherapy
Present case	2018	1	42	Right labium majus	Surgical excision	Close surgical deep resection margin	Radiotherapy	60	No

Histologically, these tumours are described as having a multinodular architecture with mucoid material and foci of haemorrhage, so that they may be initially misdiagnosed as organised haematomas (10). Misdiagnosis is common (8) and preoperative diagnosis is very difficult due to the rarity of this tumour and its presentation as a slow-growing painless lump (6). Identifying reciprocal translocation of t(9;22) (q22-31;q11-12) on immunohistochemistry has characterized these tumours as a class distinct from skeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma and aids in their diagnosis (11).

EMCs tend to be relatively chemotherapy-resistant and, therefore, the first-line treatment is surgical resection with adjuvant radiotherapy. Evidence suggests EMC has a high propensity for metastasis, mainly to the lungs, lymph nodes or bone, particularly if further characterised as high-grade, disproving earlier beliefs that it was associated with good prognosis. The estimated progression-free survival rates at 3, 4, 6 and 9 months were 69, 65, 40 and 26%, respectively (12). There are limited long-term follow-up and survival data on these patients, and even fewer on tumours affecting the female genital tract. The survival at 5, 10 and 15 years has been reported to be 82, 65 and 58%, respectively, for patients with EMC, irrespective of the site (12).

The aim of the present study was to present a case of vulval EMC to add to the currently limited scientific knowledge on this rare condition.

Case report

In 2011, a 42-year-old Caucasian woman presented with a swelling on the right labium majus, which was initially considered to be a Bartholin gland/duct cyst and was managed conservatively. The patient was reviewed 7 months later and underwent drainage and marsupialization under general anaesthesia, resulting in extensive bruising of the vulva. The patient was managed medically with antibiotics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication, and her condition resolved after 3 weeks. Six months later, the patient presented with another vulval mass at the site of the previous excision and underwent exploration and biopsy under anaesthesia. The results revealed a myxoid tumour, potentially of sarcoid origin. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen and pelvis did not demonstrate any evidence of metastasis. The case was discussed at a multidisciplinary tumour board to plan further management. The patient was referred to a subspecialist surgeon in Gynaecological Oncology for surgical excision. A planned magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) angiogram was performed to assess the extent and vascularity of the tumour. The T2-weighted sagittal images showed a well-defined lobulated high-signal mass with a low-signal capsule and an internal high signal, similar to that of the bladder (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Magnetic resonance imaging, T2 sagittal section showing a lobulated high-signal well-defined mass with a low-signal capsule, with an internal high signal similar to that of the bladder.

Intraoperatively, a 7×5-cm lobulated, vascular vulval mass was detected in the right labium majus. The tumour was firmly adherent to the periosteum of the inferior pubic ramus. A satisfactory resection of the tumour (including the periosteum) was performed, with no macroscopic residual disease. Histological examination revealed a soft tissue mass, sized 70×50×45 mm, composed of myxoid tissue arranged in lobules with fibrous septa. Examination under high-power magnification (×40) revealed cord/lace-like arrangement of small rounded and spindle cells in a myxoid-rich matrix. There was a close microscopic deep excision margin, limited by the periosteum (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Histological examination showing small rounded/spindle cells in cord/lace-like arrangement in a myxoid-rich matrix. Magnification, ×40.

Immunostaining revealed strong positivity for vimentin; however, S-100, oestrogen receptor (ER), desmin and smooth muscle actin were negative. FISH analysis for Ewing's sarcoma and FUS gene (implicated in myxoid liposarcoma and fibromyxoid sarcoma) revealed that both genes were intact. The final histological diagnosis was low-grade EMC.

The patient's condition was further discussed at the central and regional multi-disciplinary team meetings, and it was recommended that she received adjuvant external-beam pelvic radiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 sessions) due to the close deep resection margins. A postoperative MRI demonstrated no evidence of residual tumour. The surveillance follow-up included 6-monthly clinical examinations and yearly CT scans. The patient remains asymptomatic and with no evidence of recurrent disease 60 months following her initial treatment. The last clinical follow up was 10 November 2018.

Discussion

Upon reviewing the existing literature, most cases of vulval EMC usually present as painless, smooth, ‘globular’ mobile masses affecting the labia majora. They do not appear to have a predilection for a specific age or menopausal status. Most cases were treated by complete surgical resection with adequate margins. The present case differs, as the mass was firmly adherent to the periosteum of the inferior pubic ramus, rendering complete surgical excision challenging and potentially debilitating. The tumour was resected to the periosteum and the patient was offered adjuvant radiotherapy postoperatively. The diagnosis of EMC may be confirmed through immunohistochemical staining for vimentin, neuron-specific enolase, S-100 protein and mucicarmine, as described in previous cases. The present case exhibited strong staining for vimentin. The opinion of the histopathology team was that the negative genetic tests could be due to the extraskeletal location of the tumour. Whilst the molecular studies performed in this case were not suggestive of EMC, the histological appearance and staining were consistent, confirming the diagnosis.

The decision to offer adjuvant radiotherapy was considered as an acceptable option, as the patient was a young woman and radical excision with microscopic clear margins could not be guaranteed.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the longest follow-up (60 months) of a patient with confirmed EMC in the literature to date, and demonstrates that surgical resection with adjuvant radiotherapy can achieve long-term remission. However, more cases are required to assess the need for adjuvant therapy and the required length of follow-up to detect recurrence. The possibility of an EMC should be included in the differential diagnosis of women presenting with a smooth, soft and vascular vulval mass, and surgical excision with histological assessment is advised to avoid misdiagnosis.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors contributions

AEG was involved in the conception of the study. HA and MM were involved in the diagnosis of the patient. MEG was involved in the literature review and writing of the article. DON was involved in the literature review and writing of the article. All the authors have read and approved the final version of this manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Verbal consent has been obtained for publication of the case and associated photographs from the patient.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no financial interests or industrial affiliations to disclose.

References