Pseudoprogression presenting as intestinal perforation in non‑small cell lung cancer treated with anti‑PD‑1: A case report

Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibitor in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been a breakthrough in the treatment of metastatic NSCLC. Among antibodies against two classes of immune checkpoints, anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab have been established as novel and promising treatment of NSCLC (1–3). The US FDA approved pembrolizumab as a first-line therapy in October 2016. Since tumor size can increase initially due to infiltration of immune cells such as cytotoxic T lymphocytes surrounding tumors before significant shrinkage of the tumor with immunotherapy, several studies reported pseudoprogression in patients with different types of solid tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (4–6).

Pseudoprogression is unique response pattern which is observed in patients who are treated with immunotherapeutic agents (7). The initial progression due to infiltration of immune cells such as cytotoxic T lymphocytes surrounding tumors eventually regress. The prevalence of pseudoprogression is quite high in malignant melanoma, but pseudoprogression in NSCLC is not frequently observed (8,9). In addition, intestinal perforation related with pseudoprogression has not been reported yet. In this case, we firstly described the case of pseudoprogression in NSCLC treated with pembrolizumab which was presented as intestinal perforation.

Case report

A 54-year-old man presented with acute periumbilical pain in February 2018. He had been diagnosed with metastatic NSCLC with adrenal metastasis in August 2017 at Chungbuk National University Hospital. The patient had received second-line therapy with pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) since October 2017 after failing first-line therapy with pemetrexed and cisplatin chemotherapy. The abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan showed diffuse enhancing wall thickening at the duodenum through the proximal jejunum and signs of free air in the peritoneal cavity suggesting intestinal perforation (Fig. 1B). The patient underwent emergency laparotomy with segmental resection and anastomosis of the perforated small bowel. Microscopic examination of the resected specimen revealed diffuse transmural involvement of the tumor and massive infiltration of inflammatory cells (Fig. 2A). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis indicated that the infiltrating cells primarily consisted of lymphocytes, especially CD8-positive cells (Fig. 2B and C). Histopathological findings including IHC staining for TTF-1, CK7, and CK20 for tumor cells were the same as those of the primary lung mass (data not shown). Formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue were cut using a microtome (RM 2245; Leica Biosystems, Nussloch, Germany) and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). IHC staining methods were used according to the manufacturer's protocols; LCA (X16/99, 1:400; Novocastra), CD8 (1A5, 1:50; Cell Marque), TTF-1 (SPT24, 1:250; Cell Marque), CK7 (OV-TL 12/3-0, 1:100; Cell Marque), and CK20 (KS20.8, 1:100; Novocastra) using Benchmark XT autostainer (Ventana). The slides were counterstained with Harris haematoxylin. Retrospective review of the baseline CT scan revealed a suspicious focal wall thickening in the proximal jejunum that was missed at baseline (Fig. 1A). The primary lung tumor and a metastatic adrenal mass achieved partial response (PR) after two cycles of treatment and remained in PR state at the time of presentation (Fig. 1B). Tumor-related or gastrointestinal symptoms suggestive of intestinal pathology did not develop until the occurrence of the perforation. Treatment was skipped during the postoperative period, and a follow-up CT scan at 3 weeks after surgery showed spontaneous resolution of the small bowel wall thickening (Fig. 1C). The patient recovered without events, and pembrolizumab treatment was resumed 4 weeks after surgery.

Figure 1. Serial abdominal CT images showing pseudoprogression of the intestinal lesion and corresponding time point responses in the target lesion (left adrenal gland, red circle). (A) At baseline, suspicious focal wall thickening in the proximal jejunum is noted (yellow arrows). (B) After 15 weeks of treatment, the CT scan shows diffuse wall thickening with enhancement in the proximal small intestine (yellow arrows). The left adrenal gland shows a PR (red circle). (C) The intestinal wall thickening spontaneously resolved at 3 weeks after surgery. The left adrenal gland was slightly more decreased (red circle). PR, partial response; CT, computed tomography.

Figure 2. Histopathological findings and immunostaining of surgical specimens. (A) Transmural spread by tumor cells with geographic necrosis (hematoxylin and eosin; original magnification, ×12). (B) Poorly differentiated carcinoma with inflammatory cell infiltration (hematoxylin and eosin; original magnification, ×400). (C) Immunohistochemistry shows infiltration of cytotoxic T lymphocytes positive for CD3. Magnification, ×200. (D) Immunohistochemistry shows infiltration of cytotoxic T lymphocytes positive for CD8. Magnification, ×200.

Discussion

Pseudoprogression is observed in 6.7 to 10% of patients with melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors; however, the frequency of pseudoprogression in other solid tumors including NSCLC is below 5% (8). Although the mechanism of pseudoprogression is not completely understood, it is thought to be caused by infiltration of inflammatory cells leading to transient enlargement of existing tumor masses or appearance of new lesions that eventually regress (10). The pathologic findings in the present case revealed extensive infiltration of immune cells, including cytotoxic CD8-positive T cells, into tumor tissue, which is in line with the immune infiltration theory. However, because tumor volume is largely determined by tumor cells, as shown in this case, further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanism by which the cancer cells transiently proliferate during the course of immunotherapy. Novel response criteria developed for the response evaluation of immunotherapy require confirmation of progressive disease to prevent inappropriate discontinuation of effective therapy (11,12). Discriminating pseudoprogression from true progression is often challenging in clinical practice. In general, patients with pseudoprogression tend to be clinically stable without the aggravation of tumor-related symptoms (11). In the present case, the patient had no gastrointestinal symptoms such as vomiting or diarrhea until the occurrence of the intestinal perforation and rapidly recovered after the operation. There was the possibility that anti-tumor effect of pembrolizumab resulted in intestinal perforation rather than pseudoprogression, the diffuse wall thickening of the small bowel after pembrolizumab (Fig. 1B) in current case remains to be explained. Any tumor marker was not analyzed in the patients, tumor markers could be measured for future cases.

Although pseudoprogression is not frequent in NSCLC, clinicians should be aware of a possible unusual presentation during immunotherapy.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

HKK, HSH, CGW and OJL acquired, analyzed and interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. SWB, YJ, YY, JK, JYA and TGL interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. KHL contributed to the conception and design of the study, analyzed and interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

The patient provided written informed consent to publish his data.

Competing interests

KL has been personally compensated for participating in advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca and Eli Lilly and Company. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References