|
1
|
Müller VC and Bostrom N: Future progress
in artificial intelligence: A survey of expert opinion. In:
Fundamental Issues of Artificial IntelligenceSpringer; Berlin: pp.
555–572. 2016
|
|
2
|
Silver D, Schrittwieser J, Simonyan K,
Antonoglou I, Huang A, Guez A, Hubert T, Baker L, Lai M, Bolton A,
et al: Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge. Nature.
550:354–359. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
3
|
Arbyn M, Castellsagué X, de Sanjosé S,
Bruni L, Saraiya M, Bray F and Ferlay J: Worldwide burden of
cervical cancer in 2008. Ann Oncol. 22:2675–2686. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
4
|
Garcia-Arteaga JD, Kybic J and Li W:
Automatic colposcopy video tissue classification using higher order
entropy-based image registration. Comput Biol Med. 41:960–970.
2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
5
|
Kyrgiou M, Tsoumpou I, Vrekoussis T,
Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Mitrou S, Koliopoulos G,
Dalkalitsis N, Stamatopoulos P and Paraskevaidis E: The up-to-date
evidence on colposcopy practice and treatment of cervical
intraepithelial neoplasia: The Cochrane colposcopy and cervical
cytopathology collaborative group (C5 group) approach. Cancer Treat
Rev. 32:516–523. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
6
|
O'Neill E, Reeves MF and Creinin MD:
Baseline colposcopic findings in women entering studies on female
vaginal products. Contraception. 78:162–166. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
7
|
Waxman AG, Chelmow D, Darragh TM, Lawson H
and Moscicki AB: Revised terminology for cervical histopathology
and its implications for management of high-grade squamous
intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol.
120:1465–1471. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
8
|
Darragh TM, Colgan TJ, Cox JT, Heller DS,
Henry MR, Luff RD, McCalmont T, Nayar R, Palefsky JM, Stoler MH, et
al: The lower anogenital squamous terminology standardization
project for HPV-associated lesions: Background and consensus
recommendations from the college of American pathologists and the
American society for colposcopy and cervical pathology. J Low Genit
Tract Dis. 16:205–242. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
9
|
Dreiseitl S and Ohno-Machado L: Logistic
regression and artificial neural network classification models: A
methodology review. J Biomed Inform. 35:352–359. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
10
|
Ben-Bassat M, Klove KL and Weil MH:
Sensitivity analysis in Bayesian classification models:
Multiplicative deviations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell.
2:261–266. 1980. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
11
|
Friedman JH, Baskett F and Shustek LJ: An
algorithm for finding nearest neighbors. IEEE Trans Comput.
24:1000–1006. 1975. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
12
|
Breiman L: Random forests. Mach Lean.
45:5–32. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
13
|
Rumelhart D, Hinton G and Williams R:
Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature.
323:533–536. 1986. View
Article : Google Scholar
|
|
14
|
Bengio Y, Courville A and Vincent P:
Representation learning: A review and new perspectives. IEEE Trans
Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 35(1): 798–828. 2013.
|
|
15
|
Fukushima K: Neocognitron: A
self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern
recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biol Cybern.
36:193–202. 1980. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
16
|
Hubel DH and Wiesel TN: Receptive fields
and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol.
195:215–243. 1968. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
17
|
Hubel DH and Wiesel TN: Receptive fields
of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol.
148:574–591. 1959. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
18
|
Schmidhuber J: Deep learning in neural
networks: An overview. Neural Netw. 61:85–117. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
19
|
LeCun Y, Bottou L, Orr GB and Müller KR:
Efficient BackPropNeural Networks: Tricks of the Trade. Springer;
Berlin: 1998
|
|
20
|
LeCun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y and Haffner P:
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc IEEE.
86:2278–2324. 1998. View
Article : Google Scholar
|
|
21
|
LeCun Y, Boser B, Denker JS, Henderson D,
Howard RE, Hubbard W and Jackel LD: Backpropagation applied to
handwritten zip code recognition. Neural Computation. 1:541–551.
1989. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
22
|
Serre T, Wolf L, Bileschi S, Riesenhuber M
and Poggio T: Robust object recognition with cortex-like
mechanisms. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 29:411–426. 2007.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
23
|
Wiatowski T and Bölcskei H: A mathematical
theory of deep convolutional neural networks for feature
extraction. IEEE Trans Inf Theory. 64:1845–1866. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
24
|
Srivastava N, Hinton G, Krizhevsky A,
Sutskever I and Salakhutdinov R: Dropout: A simple way to prevent
neural networks from overfitting. J Mach Lean Res. 15:1929–1958.
2014.
|
|
25
|
Nowlan SJ and Hinton GE: Simplifying
neural networks by soft weight-sharing. Neural Comput. 4:473–493.
1992. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
26
|
Bengio Y: Learning deep architectures for
AI. Found Trends Mach Lean. 2:1–127. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
27
|
Mutch J and Lowe DG: Object class
recognition and localization using sparse features with limited
receptive fields. Int J Comput Vision. 80:45–57. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
28
|
Neal RM: Connectionist learning of belief
networks. Artificial Intell. 56:71–113. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
29
|
Ciresan D, Meier U, Masci J, Gambardella
LΜ and Schmidhuber J: Flexible, high performance convolutional
neural networks for image classification. IJCAI Proc Int Joint Conf
Artificial Intell. 22:1237–1242. 2011.
|
|
30
|
Scherer D, Müller A and Behnke S:
Evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for
object recognition. In: Artificial Neural Networks (ICANN)
2010Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Diamantaras K, Duch W and
Iliadis LS: Springer; Berlin: pp. 92–101. 2010, View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
31
|
Huang FJ and LeCun Y: Large-scale learning
with SVM and convolutional for generic object categorization.
Computer vision and pattern recognition. IEEE Comput Soc Conf.
1:284–291. 2006.
|
|
32
|
Jarrett K, Kavukcuoglu K, Ranzato MA and
LeCun Y: What is the best multi-stage architecture for object
recognition?2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer
Vision. ICCV 2009; Kyoto, Japan: pp. 2146–2153. 2009, View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
33
|
Zheng Y, Liu Q, Chen E, Ge Y and Zhao JL:
Time series classification using multi-channels deep convolutional
neural networksLi F, Li G, Hwang S, Yao B and Zhang Z: Web-Age
Information Management, WAIM 2014. Springer; Cham: pp. 298–310.
2014
|
|
34
|
Mnih V, Kavukcuoglu K, Silver D, Rusu AA,
Veness J, Bellemare MG, Graves A, Riedmiller M, Fidjeland AK,
Ostrovski G, et al: Human-level control through deep reinforcement
learning. Nature. 518:529–533. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
35
|
Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y, Sermanet P, Reed
S, Anguelov D, et al: Going deeper with convolutions. IEEE
Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 1–9.
2015.
|
|
36
|
Glorot X, Bordes A and Bengio Y: Deep
sparse rectifier neural networks. Proc Fourteenth Int Conf
Artificial Intell Stat. 315–323. 2011.
|
|
37
|
Nair V and Hinton G: Rectified linear
units improve restricted Boltzmann machines. Proc Int Conf Mach
Lean. 807–814. 2010.
|
|
38
|
Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I and Hinton GE:
Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks.
Adv Neural Inf Proc Syst. 1097–1105. 2012.
|
|
39
|
Bridle JS: Probabilistic interpretation of
feedforward classification network outputs, with relationships to
statistical pattern recognitionNeurocomputing. Soulié FF and
Hérault J: Springer; Berlin: 1990, View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
40
|
He K, Zhang X, Ren S and Sun J: Deep
residual learning for image recognition. arXiv: 1512.03385.
2015.
|
|
41
|
Russakovsky O, Deng J, Su H, Krause J,
Satheesh S, Ma S, Huang Z, Karpathy A, Khosla A, Bernstein M and
Berg AC: Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge. Int J
Comput Vision. 115:211–252. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
42
|
Lin, Tsung-Yi, Michael Maire, Serge
Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Dollár and
C. Lawrence Zitnick: Microsoft coco: Common objects in contextIn
European conference on computer vision. pp. 740–755. Springer;
Cham: 2014
|
|
43
|
Kohavi R: A study of cross-validation and
bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. Proc Int
Joint Conf Artificial Intell. 2:1137–1143. 1995.
|
|
44
|
Schaffer C: Selecting a classification
method by cross-validation. Mach Lean. 13:135–143. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
45
|
Refaeilzadeh P, Tang L and Liu H:
Cross-validationEncyclopedia of Database Systems. Liu L and Özsu
MT: Springer; New York: 2009
|
|
46
|
Yu L, Chen H, Dou Q, Qin J and Heng PA:
Automated melanoma recognition in dermoscopy images via very deep
residual networks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 36:994–1004. 2017.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
47
|
Caruana R, Lawrence S and Giles CL:
Overfitting in neural nets: Backpropagation, conjugate gradient,
and early stopping. Adv Neural Inf Proc Syst. 402–408. 2001.
|
|
48
|
Baum EB and Haussler D: What size net
gives valid generalization? Neural Comput. 1:151–160. 1989.
View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
49
|
Geman S, Bienenstock E and Doursat R:
Neural networks and the bias/variance dilemma. Neural Comput.
4:1–58. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
50
|
Krogh A and Hertz JA: A simple weight
decay can improve generalization. Adv Neural Inf Proc Syst.
4:950–957. 1992.
|
|
51
|
Moody JE: The effective number of
parameters: An analysis of generalization and regularization in
nonlinear learning systems. Adv Neural Inf Proc Syst. 4:847–854.
1992.
|
|
52
|
Cohen J: A coefficient of agreement for
nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 20:37–46. 1960. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
53
|
Youden WJ: Index for rating diagnostic
tests. Cancer. 3:32–35. 1950. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
54
|
McHugh ML: Interrater reliability: the
kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 22:276–282. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
55
|
Miyagi Y, Fujiwara K, Oda T, Miyake T and
Coleman RL: Development of new method for the prediction of
clinical trial results using compressive sensing of artificial
intelligence. J Biostat Biometric. 3:2022018.
|
|
56
|
Abbod MF, Catto JW, Linkens DA and Hamdy
FC: Application of artificial intelligence to the management of
urological cancer. J Urol. 178:1150–1156. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
57
|
Litjens G, Sánchez CI, Timofeeva N,
Hermsen M, Nagtegaal I, Kovacs I, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C, Bult P,
van Ginneken B and van der Laak J: Deep learning as a tool for
increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosis.
Sci Rep. 6:262862016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
58
|
Ortiz A, Munilla J, Górriz JM and Ramírez
J: Ensembles of deep learning architectures for the early diagnosis
of the Alzheimer's disease. Int J Neural Syst. 26:16500252016.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
59
|
Gil D, Johnsson M, Chamizo JMG, Paya AS
and Fernandez DR: Application of artificial neural networks in the
diagnosis of urological disfunctions. Expert Syst Appl.
36:5754–5760. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar
|
|
60
|
Simões PW, Izumi NB, Casagrande RS, Venson
R, Veronezi CD, Moretti GP, da Rocha EL, Cechinel C, Ceretta LB,
Comunello E, et al: Classification of images acquired with
colposcopy using artificial neural networks. Cancer Inform.
13:119–124. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
61
|
Sato M, Horie K, Hara A, Miyamoto Y,
Kurihara K, Tomio K and Yokota H: Application of deep learning to
the classification of images from colposcopy. Oncol Lett.
15:3518–3523. 2018.PubMed/NCBI
|
|
62
|
Trebeschi S, van Griethuysen JJM,
Lambregts DMJ, Lahaye MJ, Parmar C, Bakers FCH, Peters NHGM,
Beets-Tan RGH and Aerts HJWL: Deep learning for fully-automated
localization and segmentation of rectal cancer on multiparametric
MR. Sci Rep. 7:53012017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
63
|
Olczak J, Fahlberg N, Maki A, Razavian AS,
Jilert A, Stark A, Sköldenberg O and Gordon M: Artificial
intelligence for analyzing orthopedic trauma radiographs. Acta
Orthop. 88:581–586. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
64
|
Khosravi P, Kazemi E, Zhan Q, Toschi M,
Makmsten J, Hickman C, Meseguer M, Rosenwaks Z, Elemento O,
Zaninovic N and Hajirasouliha I: Robust automated assessment of
human blastocyst quality using deep learning. bioRxiv 394882.
2018.
|
|
65
|
Miyagi Y, Habara T, Hirata R and Hayashi
N: Feasibility of artificial intelligence for predicting live birth
without aneuploidy from a blastocyst image. Reprod Med Biol.
18:204–211. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
66
|
Miyagi Y, Habara T, Hirata R and Hayashi
N: Feasibility of deep learning for predicting live birth from a
blastocyst image in patients classified by age. Reprod Med Biol.
18:190–203. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
67
|
Sideri M, Garutti P, Costa S, Cristiani P,
Schincaglia P, Sassoli de Bianchi P, Naldoni C and Bucchi L:
Accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy: Results from an online
quality assurance programme for colposcopy in a population-based
cervical screening setting in Italy. BioMed Res Int.
2015:6140352015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
68
|
Sideri M, Spolti N, Spinaci L, Sanvito F,
Ribaldone R, Surico N and Bucchi L: Interobserver variability of
colposcopic interpretations and consistency with final histologic
results. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 8:212–216. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
69
|
Massad LS, Jeronimo J, Katki HA and
Schiffman M; National Institutes of Health/American Society for
Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Research Group, : The accuracy of
colposcopic grading for detection of high grade cervical
intraepithelial neoplasia. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 13:137–144. 2009.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
70
|
LeCun Y, Haffner P, Bottou L and Bengio Y:
Object recognition with gradient-based learning. In Shape, contour
and grouping in computer visionSpringer; Berlin, Heidelberg:
1999
|
|
71
|
Hu J, Shen L and Sun G:
Squeeze-and-excitation networks. Proceedings of the IEEE conference
on computer vision and pattern recognition. 7132–7141. 2018.
|
|
72
|
Kudva V, Prasad K and Guruvare S:
Automation of detection of cervical cancer using convolutional
neural networks. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 46:135–145. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
|
73
|
Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, Ko J,
Swetter SM, Blau HM and Thrun S: Dermatologist-level classification
of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 542:115–118.
2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
